Deep Energy Retrofits Market in the Greater Boston Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Path to a Deep Energy Retrofit
M OUN KY T C A I O N R I N E THE PATH TO STIT U T A DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT USING AN ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT Seven key steps will help owners reach deeper energy savings through Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs). ESPCs are partnerships between a Federal agency and an energy service company (ESCO) that allow Federal agencies to complete energy-savings projects without upfront capital costs or special Congressional appropriations. What is a deep energy retrofit? Deep energy retrofits integrate a variety of energy conservation measures (ECMs) through a whole building approach to achieve superior energy savings compared to conventional retrofits, often approaching or exceeding 50% savings. They also make net-zero energy buildings more achievable by substantially reducing energy demand, which makes it easier and more cost-effective to meet remaining energy needs with renewable energy. Why do a deep energy retrofit? • To reduce GHG emissions and support the President’s Climate Deep retrofits can be Action Plan implemented across a wide spectrum of buildings and • Maximize the value of Federal appropriations conditions: • To replace aging infrastructure and improve a building system’s What is not (necessarily) reliability required for deep energy • To reduce operating costs and hedge against risks such as rising savings: high energy prices, high energy costs energy consumption or advanced energy conservation measures. • To improve occupant satisfaction, wellness, and productivity What is required for deep • To maintain access to additional cost-effective upgrades and savings: buildings in need of an infrastructure renewal in the future energy retrofit, agency support, a thorough audit process to identify measures, and an integrative Brought to you by GSA’s Office of Federal High-Performance Green Buildings design approach. -
Smart Buildings: Using Smart Technology to Save Energy in Existing Buildings
Smart Buildings: Using Smart Technology to Save Energy in Existing Buildings Jennifer King and Christopher Perry February 2017 Report A1701 © American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20045 Phone: (202) 507-4000 • Twitter: @ACEEEDC Facebook.com/myACEEE • aceee.org SMART BUILDINGS © ACEEE Contents About the Authors ..............................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... iv Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology and Scope of This Study ............................................................................................ 1 Smart Building Technologies ............................................................................................................. 3 HVAC Systems ......................................................................................................................... 4 Plug Loads ................................................................................................................................. 9 Lighting .................................................................................................................................. -
Icomfort S30 Smart Thermostat Installation and Setup Guide
iComfort® S30 Smart Thermostat Installation and Setup Guide Color Touchscreen Programmable Wi-Fi Communicating Thermostat (12U67) 507536-02 5/2017 Supersedes 10/2016 Software Version 3.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SHIPPING AND PACKING LIST ............................................. 3 Mag-Mount....................................................... 33 GENERAL ................................................................. 3 Add / Remove Equipment........................................... 33 INSTALLING CONTROL SYSTEM COMPONENTS ............................. 4 Reset ............................................................ 33 Smart Hub Installation................................................... 4 Notifications ........................................................... 33 Mag-Mount Installation.................................................. 5 Tests ................................................................. 33 HD Display External Components......................................... 6 Diagnostics ............................................................ 33 HD Display Installation.................................................. 6 Installation Report...................................................... 33 WIRING FOR CONTROL SYSTEM COMPONENTS............................. 7 Information ............................................................ 34 CONFIGURATING HEAT SECTIONS ON AIR HANDLER CONTROL.............. 12 Dealer — Information............................................... 34 SMART HUB OPERATIONS................................................ -
Paper Preparation Guidelines
2018 Building Performance Analysis Conference and SimBuild co-organized by ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA Chicago, IL September 26-28, 2018 DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT VS IMPROVING BUILDING INTELLIGENCE – DANISH CASE STUDY Muhyiddine Jradi1*, Christian T. Veje1, and Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen1 1Center for Energy Informatics, The Mærsk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark *Email:[email protected] effective energy measures and techniques (Nielsen et al. ABSTRACT 2016). However, the current approach in the majority of This study provides a preliminary assessment of the energy renovation projects and applications is driven by trade-off between deep energy retrofit and improving the need to change and modify with the absence of a the building intelligence within an energy renovation proper decision-making strategy considering different process. A standard Danish office building from the components including building envelope and energy 1980’s is considered as a case study. A detailed energy systems integration (Friege and Chappin 2014). One of model was developed in EnergyPlus to simulate the the major energy renovation approaches which has dynamic performance of the case study building. gained vast interest in the recent years is the ‘Deep Various deep energy retrofit measures were Energy Retrofit’ (DER) (Jradi et al. 2017), which is an implemented and assessed. In addition, different overall whole-building renovation approach to attain measures to improve the energy efficiency and significant energy savings. The Massachusetts Save intelligence of the building were investigated and Energy Retrofit Builder Guide defines DER as the simulated with emphasis on European Standard EN retrofit of the building enclosure and systems resulting 15232 recommendations for control and management of into a high performance building (BSC 2013). -
Ten Questions Concerning Building Performance Analysis
University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Art, Design and Architecture 2019-02-22 Ten questions concerning building performance analysis De Wilde, PJC http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13361 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.019 Building and Environment Elsevier All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. 10 Questions Ten questions concerning building performance analysis Pieter de Wilde a a Chair of Building Performance Analysis, School of Art, Design and Architecture, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Building performance analysis is an important yet surprisingly complex activity. This article explores the current understanding of the concept of building performance, and explains why its analysis is a challenging activity that mostly requires expert intervention. It addresses some of the common questions about building performance, such as: What can be learnt from other disciplines that also deal with performance? What are the benefits of applying building performance analysis in the building design process? How can building performance analysis support building operation and facility management? What is the relation between building performance analysis and the class of high performance buildings? What are the prospects of automating building performance analysis? The article concludes with some of the challenges to the development of this area of study, and provides starting points for further research in the domain of building performance analysis. -
Deep Energy Retrofits for Buildings a SHARING CITIES PLAYBOOK
Deep energy retrofits for buildings A SHARING CITIES PLAYBOOK This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation 2020 V.1 programme under Grant Agreement No 691895 Click on CONTENTS the buttons to navigate Introduction How to use this through this playbook and introduction What is this playbook? 3 document Who is this guide for? 5 1 Building retrofit: Enhancing energy efficiency 6 The challenge 8 Challenge & Solution Deep energy retrofits - What is it and why is this different to a regular building retrofit? 8 2 How to navigate the challenges of conducting building retrofits- Insights from 16 Sharing Cities Insights 3 What is the value of doing a deep retrofit 19 4 How to implement a deep retrofit 23 Exploring opportunity 24 Audience engagement 29 Benefits Technical design 35 Finance and implementation 38 Monitoring and sharing 42 Implementation Toolkit References 47 Acknowledgements 48 This playbook is produced by Sharing Cities, a major international smart cities project. It addresses some of the most pressing urban challenges cities face today across ten replicable solutions. 2 WHAT IS THIS PLAYBOOK? Introduction How to use this playbook and This guide gives an overview of how Sharing Cities rolled out introduction building retrofit schemes in its three ‘lighthouse cities’ – Lisbon, London and Milan. The aim was to address challenges in each city context and share the experience so other cities can learn from it. Challenge & Solution This playbook will: TOOLS & RESOURCES Help you understand what solutions were tested in the Sharing Cities Insights lighthouse cities and what urban challenges they address. -
I HISTORIC WINDOWS and SUSTAINABILITY
HISTORIC WINDOWS AND SUSTAINABILITY: A COMPARISON OF HISTORIC AND REPLACEMENT WINDOWS BASED ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY, LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS, EMBODIED ENERGY, AND DURABILITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION BY ERIN CASEY WARE (WALTER GRONDZIK) BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA MAY 2011 i Acknowledgements I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Walter Grondzik, William Hill, and David Kroll, for sharing their time and expertise. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Defining Sustainability 16 Chapter 3: History of Windows 28 Chapter 4: Window Materials 40 Chapter 5: Windows and Energy 53 Chapter 6: Embodied Energy and Life Cycle Analysis 75 Chapter 7: Durability 85 Chapter 8: Findings 91 Appendix A National Park Service Technical Preservation Services Brief 9: The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows 97 Brief 13: The Repair and Thermal Upgrading of Historic Steel Windows 104 iii Appendix B Durability of Timber 116 Bibliography 117 iv Chapter 1 Introduction Historic preservation and environmentalism are often understood as unrelated or even opposing disciplines. Environmentalism is seen as dealing with the future while historic preservation is only concerned with the past. Popular perception is that only new buildings constructed using the latest green products are sustainable. Historic preservationists have long argued that historic buildings are inherently green because the energy required in their construction has already been expended. While this embodied energy is certainly a consideration, thorough research on whether historic buildings are sustainable in other ways has not been conducted. -
The Lennox Standard of Excellence. Merit® Series Is the Introductory
Residential Products AIR CONDITIONERS & HEAT PUMPS GAS FURNACES OIL FURNACES AIR HANDLERS THERMOSTATS AIR PURIFICATION SL28XCV/XP25 AIR CONDITIONER AND HEAT PUMP XC21/XP21 AIR CONDITIONER AND HEAT PUMP SLP99V GAS FURNACE SL297NV ULTRA-LOW EMISSIONS GAS FURNACE SLO185V OIL FURNACE8 CBA38MV AIR HANDLER ICOMFORT® S30 ULTRA SMART THERMOSTAT LENNOX PUREAIR™ S The most precise and efficient air conditioner The most efficient two-stage central air The quietest and most efficient furnace you can buy!5 • 97.5% AFUE The quietest and most efficient air handler you can buy!9 • Wi-Fi-enabled ultra-smart thermostat for iComfort- 1 4 AIR PURIFICATION SYSTEM and heat pump you can buy conditioner and heat pump you can buy • Up to 99% AFUE • Meets new ultra-low emissions standards in California • Variable-speed motor for even temperatures enabled equipment Senses and communicates, and cleans • SL28XCV up to 28.00 SEER • XC21 up to 21.00 SEER • Variable-capacity heating operation the air in your home better than any • Two-stage heating operation and quiet operation • Precise Comfort – Holds the home’s temperature to within 11 • XP25 up to 23.50 SEER and 10.20 HSPF • XP21 up to 19.20 SEER and 9.80 HSPF • High-efficiency variable-speed blower 0.5 degrees or less when used with Lennox modulating other single system you can buy! ® • High-efficiency variable-speed blower • Antimicrobial drain pan for improved indoor • Precise Comfort design with a variable-capacity • SilentComfort fan motor minimizes sound while • Precise Comfort design air quality equipment -
Business and Technical Concepts for Deep Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings
AT-15-009 Business and Technical Concepts for Deep Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings Alexander Zhivov, PhD Ruediger Lohse John Shonder Cyrus Nasseri Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE Heimo Staller Ove Moerck, PhD Marko Nokkala ABSTRACT energy retrofit projects. Nevertheless, in many countries the number of projects funded by ESPCs still do not form a signif- Many governments worldwide are setting more stringent icant part of the total investment budgeted by public institu- targets for reductions in energy use in government/public tions for energy retrofits. This paper presents the concept and buildings. Buildings constructed more than 10 years ago several case studies that illustrate mechanisms that will account for a major share of energy used by the building stock. increase the acceptance of deep energy retrofit (DER) and However, the funding and “know-how” (applied knowledge) broaden acceptance of its implementation using ESPCs for a available for owner-directed energy retrofit projects has not comprehensive refurbishment of existing buildings. kept pace with new requirements.With typical retrofit projects, reduction of energy use varies between 10% and 20%, while TECHNOLOGY BUNDLES experience from executed projects around the globe shows that energy-use reduction can exceed 50%, and renovated build- What Is Deep Energy Retrofit? ings can cost-effectively achieve the passive-house standard or even approach net zero energy status (Hermelink and Muller, Though the deep energy retrofit (DER) concept is currently 2010; NBI 2014; RICS 2013; GreenBuildingAdvisor.com used all over the world, there is no established global definition of 2013; Shonder and Nasseri 2015; Miller and Higgins 2015; this term. -
Environmental Considerations of Building Insulation National Park Service – Pacific West Region
Environmental Considerations of Building Insulation National Park Service – Pacific West Region Overview Insulation is a commonly used product in the building industry. The manufacture, use, and disposal of insulation is associated with a number of positive and negative environmental impacts. What follows is a brief overview of “green” insulation, vendors, and an in-depth article from Environmental Building News on the environmental comparisons of insulation materials. • The most significant environmental issue associated with insulation manufacture in recent years has been the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as foaming agents. By 1993 virtually all CFCs had been eliminated from insulation manufacture; hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) have been substituted in most products. These are significantly better than CFCs, but they still result in some ozone depletion, and they contribute to global warming, and are, therefore, also scheduled for phaseout over the next decade. • All insulation materials reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions by reducing heating and air-conditioning requirements of a building. This benefit almost always outweighs environmental problems associated with certain materials. • Do not substitute a “green” insulation material for a non-green material if doing so will result in lower overall energy performance. Even though the environmental impacts of the insulation material might be lower for the green product, the overall environmental impact of the building would likely be greater by lower insulating values. • Fiber insulation materials (cellulose, fiberglass, mineral wool, cotton) generally have lower environmental impacts associated with their manufacture than foam plastic insulation materials, although they usually do not offer as high per- inch R-values. When insulation thickness is not unduly restricted, specify fiber insulation. -
Green Retrofit of Existing Non-Domestic Buildings As a Multi Criteria Decision Making Process
Green retrofit of existing non-domestic buildings as a multi criteria decision making process by Jin Si Institute of Environmental Design and Engineering University College London Primary Supervisor: Dr Ljiljana Marjanovic-Halburd, IEDE Secondary Supervisor: Dr Sarah Bell, CEGE A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London 2017 Abstract With increased awareness of natural resources depletion, environmental pollution and social issues, the importance of sustainable development has been emphasised. Sustainable development is accepted as a guiding principle to reconcile economic development with limited natural resources and the dangers of environmental degradation. The building industry is a vital element of any economy and can have a significant impact on the environment. By virtue of the large size of existing buildings, green retrofit of existing buildings is an effective approach to improve building sustainability and energy performance. Unlike domestic building retrofit, bound in the research, non-domestic building retrofit lacks a sufficient research and requires a further investigation. Green retrofit of existing buildings is a complex decision making process. With the rise of sustainability agenda in the building sector, it is essential for decision makers to consider sustainability criteria, which address environmental, economic and social performance. Due to the intrinsic characteristic of existing buildings, technical challenges can emerge when integrating green technologies or measures. The qualitative and quantitative nature of these multiple criteria can increase the complexity of the decision making process. In addition, the decision making process may involve stakeholders from varying backgrounds. The conflicting perspectives can be the main barrier in the decision making of green retrofits. -
Smart Home Air Filtering System: a Randomized Controlled Trial for Performance Evaluation
Smart Home Air Filtering System: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Performance Evaluation Kyeong T. Mina, Philip Lundriganb, Katherine Swardc, Scott C. Collingwoodd, Neal Patwaria aElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, United States bSchool of Computing, University of Utah, United States cCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, United States dSchool of Medicine, University of Utah, United States Abstract Airborne particulate matter (PM) exposure exacerbates asthma and other respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. Using an indoor air purifier or furnace fan can reduce the PM concentration, however, these devices consume sig- nificant energy. We designed and built an air quality automation system called SmartAir that uses measurements from PM sensors to control a home’s furnace fan. When PM is high, SmartAir turns on the furnace fan, pulling air through a filter to reduce the air pollutant concentration. When the PM is low, the fan is off to conserve energy. We describe an architecture we introduce to automatically perform a repeated measurement randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate SmartAir. We argue this is an appropriate scientific method to use to evaluate a variety of IoT systems that purport to improve our living conditions but whose performance is complicated by individual differences and confounding variables. We deployed SmartAir in four homes for 350 days in which each day has a randomly chosen experimental condition. The results demonstrate that SmartAir achieves air quality approximately as good 3 3 as when the fan is always on (average PM2:5 = 6:13 µg/m SmartAir vs. 5.71 µg/m On) while using 58% less energy.