All:Dra AGRICUL Lure a BIBLIOGRAPHY of ALBERTA ENTOMOLOGY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

All:Dra AGRICUL Lure a BIBLIOGRAPHY of ALBERTA ENTOMOLOGY A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ALBERTA ENTOMOLOGY 1883 to 1977 All:Dra AGRICUL lURE A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ALBERTA ENTOMOLOGY 1883 to 1977 Dr. A. M. Harper Research Scientist Agriculture Canada Research Station Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada Issued July, 1979 INTRODUCTION CanadianAlberta EnvironmentWildlifeForest ServoEdmontonRalstonBrooksServo This' bibliography contains references to AA NotSuffieldAgricultureAlbertaUniversityAlbertaassociatedAgriculturePublicExp.AgricultureofCanadaSta.,CalgaryAlbertawithHealthEdmontonCalgaryBeaverlodgeLethbridgeany professionalor Edmontoninstitution in Alberta the scienti,fic, technical,ACLAEACBUCAPHCWSCFIAABand miscellaneousDep. National DefenceSESUA papers on entomology published by entomologists while working in Alberta. Work done by ento• mologists before coming to Alberta or after leaving Alberta is not included unless the publication is mainly related to work done in the province. Research by Alberta entomologists while on sabbatical leave or when working temporarily out of the province is included. Theses published at the Universities of Alberta and Calgary, and those published at other universities by scientists on leave from positions in Alberta are contained in this bibliography. References to book reviews, editorials, and papers in newsletters, such as the Apiculture Newsletter, Crop Protection Newsletter, or the Lethbridge Research Station Weekly Letter, have been omitted. References to the abstracts of papers given at the annual meeting of the Entomological Society of Alberta Following the bibliography is a co-author are not included as a bibliography of these index (page 84) and an index with subject and common will be published in the Proceedings of that and scientific names (page 89). Society. I am indebted to Dr. H. R. Wong who gave As data in the Pesticide Research Reports considerable help with the forest entomology published by the Canada Committee on Pesticide references; R. M. Smith who sent a prepublication Use in Agriculture (CCPUA) are used by the copy of his "Bibliography of Forest Entomology pesticide industry, government agencies, and Research, 1927-77, Canadian Forest Service, researchers to further the development and Prairie Region"; Drs. G. E. Ball and G. Pritchard registration of insecticides, these reports who forwarded much information on entomology at have been included in the bibliography. Dr. N. the Universities of Edmonton and Calgary, T., Bostol1ian, Secretary, CCPUA, has indicated respectively; Dr. C. D. Bird who helped with early that the following statement published in the references on butterflies; and J. B. Gurba who preface of each issue of Pesticide Research provided information on entomological papers by Reports should be noted: provincial agricultural employees. The help of the following Agriculture Canada Research Station "The information in this report is not personnel is gratefully acknowledged: J. P. Miska • .for puulll.aLlOli U.l. .l.clca:lC wlUlvu~ ~lit; Librarian, G. C. R. Croome, Editor, E. J. Balfour, express permission of the author(s). The Typist, and T. P. Story, proofreading. The report is not for release to the press or clerical assistance of M. Miska and the indexing other public news and information media." assistance of L. A. Jacobson, Alberta Agriculture, were greatly appreciated. I am also grateful to In the bibliography, in addition to refer• the many people who provided references, replied ences to insects, there are references to to letters, answered questions, and provided ticks, spiders, mites, nematodes, millipedes, background information for this bibliography. centipedes, and earthworms, as entomologists are someFi-l)1esexpected to study or make recom• Considerable effort has been made to mendatibhs'bn the control of these related locate all references but some have undoubtedly groups. been missed. I would appreciate having any errors or omissions drawn to my attention. The entries are arranged alphabetically by author(s), year, title, and source, and are This project was sponsored by Agriculture numbered consecutively. Each entry is followed Canada and Alberta Agriculture through its by a code to indicate the author's location, Research Trust and Plant Industry Division. which is as follows: A. M. Harper, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. April 1979 1. Abdelnur, a.M. 1966. The biology of 16. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Chemical some black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) control of cattle pests. A1ta. Agric., of Alberta. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Alta., Agdex 651, 4 p. (Also Pub. 157, 1962• Edmonton, Alta. [UA] 1965.) [AA] 2. Abdelnur, a.M. 1968. The biology of 17. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Control of some black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) garden pests. Alta. Agric., Agdex 625, of Alberta. Quaest. Entomol. 4:92-111. 4 p. (Also Circ. 42, 1941; Pub. 130, [UA] 1958, 1961, 1964, 1965; Pub. 625, 1968, 1970, 1973.) [M] 3. Addison, J.A. 1975. Ecology of Collem• bola at a high arctic site, Devon Island, 18. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Control of N.W.T. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Calgary, grasshoppers in Alberta. Alta. Agric., Calgary, Alta. [UC] Agdex 622-4, 3 p. (Also Pub. 145, 1961, 1964, 1965, Pub. 622-4-1.) [M] 4. Adisoemarto, S. 1965. The taxonomy and distribution of the Asilidae (Diptera) of 19. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Control of Alberta. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Alta., houseflies in Alberta. Alta. Agric., Edmonton, Alta. [UA] Agdex 672-1, 4 p. [AA] 5. Adisoemarto, S. 1967. The Asilidae 20. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Insect con• (Diptera) of Alberta. Quaest. Entomol. trol in commercial vegetable crops. 3:3-90. [UA] Alta. Agric., Agdex 250/625-1, 5 p. [M] 6. Alberta Agriculture. 1941. Grain mites. 21. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Preparing Circ. 41. [M] pollen supplement. Alta. Agric. Agdex 626-16, 1. p. [M] 7. Alberta Agriculture. 1954. Houseflies and their control. Pub. 14 (prepared by 22. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. pyrethrin W. Lobay and A. M. Wilson). [M] insecticides. Alta. Agric., Agdex 606-5, 2 p. [M] 8. Alberta Agriculture. 1956. Control of houseflies and mosquitoes. [No number]. 23. Alberta Agriculture. 1976. Recommenda• [M] tions for preventative drug treatment in package bees. Alta. Agric., Agdex 616-10, 9. Alberta Agriculture. 1956. Warble fly 1 p. [M] control. Pub. 98. (Also Circ. 3, 1939; Circ. 14, 1940.) [M] 24. Alberta Agriculture. 1977. Control of field crop insects. Alta. Agric., Agdex 10. Alberta Agriculture. 1965. Control of 100/622, 4 p. (Also Pub. 622, 1969-1974; insects on ornamental trees, shrubs, and Pub. 632, 1966-1968, 1975-1976.) [M] shelterbelts. Pub. 627. [M] 25. Alberta Agriculture. 1977. Fungicides 11. Alberta Agriculture. 1966. Chemical and fungicide/insecticide combinations control of field crop insects. Pub. available to home owners. Alta. Agric., 632. (Also Pub. 139, 1960-1965.) [M] Agdex 606-6, 2 p. [M] 12. Alberta Agriculture. 1967. Recommended 26. Alberta Agriculture. 1977. Seed treat• mosquito abatement procedures for Alberta ment of cereal and oilseed crops. Alta. municipalities, parks, camps, and resorts. Agric., Agdex 100/632, 2 p. [AA] (Prepared by Alberta Mosquito Control Committee.) Pub. 673-2. [M] 27. Alberta Agriculture. 1977. Why bees need pollen. Alta. Agric., Agdex 616-18, 13. Alberta Agriculture. 1968. Control of 5 p. [AA] livestock insects. Pub. 651. (Also Pub. 157, 1962-1965.) [M] 28. Alberta Environment. 1974. Mosquito control guide. Alta. Agric., Agdex 14. Alberta Agriculture. 1972. A guide for 673-2. (Also Alta. Agric. Agdex 673-2, the control of mosquitoes in Alberta 1973-1974.) (Prepared by Alberta Mosquito municipalities, parks, camps, and resorts. Control Committee.) [AE] (Prepared by Alberta Mosquito Control Committee.) Pub. 673-2. (Also 1969, 29. Alberta Environment Conservation 1970.) [M] Authority. 1974. Public hearings into the use of pesticides and herbicides in 15. Alberta Agriculture. 1972. Grass- Alberta. Terms of reference. Inf. hopper control in Alberta. Pub. 622-4-1. Bull. 1, 9 p. [AE] (Also Pub. 145, 1961, 1964, 1965; Pub. 622-4-1, 1967.) [M] 3 30. Alberta Environment Conservation public hearings into the use of pesti• Authority. 1974. Public hearings cides and herbicides in Alberta. Oct. into the use of pesticides and herbi• 1974-Apr. 1975. Vol. VI, Supplementary cides in Alberta. A prospectus. Inf. hearings at Edmonton, Feb. 25-Apr. 17, Bull. 2. 18 p. [AE] 1975. [AE] 31. Alberta Environment Conservation 40. Alberta Environment Conservation Authority. 1974. Public hearings Authority. 1975. Proceedings of the into the use of pesticides and herbi• public hearings into the use of pesti• cides in Alberta. Biocide use in cides and herbicides in Alberta. Oct. Alberta. Part 1: Introduction and 1974-Apr. 1975. Vol. VII, Index of sub• registration procedures. Inf. Bull. missions. [AE] 3, 64 p. [AE] 41. Alberta Environment Conservation 32. Alberta Environment Conservation Authority. 1976. The use of pesti• Authority. 1974. Public hearings cides and herbicides in Alberta. Report into the use of pesticides and herbi• and recommendations. 208 p. [AE] cides in Alberta. Biocide use in Alberta. Part IV: The use of insecti• 42. Alberta Public Health. 1945. Louse cides in Alberta. Inf. Bull. 6, 43 p. control. E.D. 4. [APH] [AE] 43. Alberta Public Health. 1950. Cockroach 33. Alberta Environment Conservation control. E.D. 12. [APH] Authority. 1974. Public hearings into the use of pesticides and herbi• 44. Alberta Public Health. 1963. Control cides in Alberta. The effects of pesti• of bedbugs in the home. [No number]. [APH] cide use on productivity and health in Alberta. Inf. Bull. 8, 86 p. [AE] 45. Albright, W.D.
Recommended publications
  • Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana Stephanie Gil Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gil, Stephanie, "Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 1067. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1067 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUCCESSIO OF COLEOPTERA O FRESHLY KILLED LOBLOLLY PIE (PIUS TAEDA L.) AD SOUTHER RED OAK ( QUERCUS FALCATA MICHAUX) I LOUISIAA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Entomology by Stephanie Gil B. S. University of New Orleans, 2002 B. A. University of New Orleans, 2002 May 2008 DEDICATIO This thesis is dedicated to my parents who have sacrificed all to give me and my siblings a proper education. I am indebted to my entire family for the moral support and prayers throughout my years of education. My mother and Aunt Gloria will have several extra free hours a week now that I am graduating.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabid Beetles Collected from Vegetable Ecosystem
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(6): 1581-1590 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2018; 7(6): 1581-1590 Carabid beetles collected from vegetable Received: 16-09-2018 Accepted: 18-10-2018 ecosystem Phunu Mili Department of Entomology, Phunu Mili, Anjumoni Devee and Dilip Kumar Saikia Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India Abstract The work on 'Carabid complex of horticultural orchards' was conducted in the Experimental Farm, Anjumoni Devee Department of Horticulture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-13, during the year 2014-2015 and Department of Entomology, Assam Agricultural University, 2015-16 to give a comprehensive information of carabids found in horticultural crops. Carabids were Jorhat, Assam, India collected by pitfall trap, light trap, sweep net and hand picking from okra, brinjal, cabbage, cucumber and bean. Total 12 species of carabids belonging to 7 genera viz., Clivina, Scarites, Harpalus, Pherosophus, Dilip Kumar Saikia Pterostichus, Chlaenius, and Sparostes under 6 tribes- Clivinini, Scaritini, Harpalini, Brachinini, Department of Entomology, Pterostichini and Chlaeniini and 5 subfamily (Scaritinae, Harpalinae, Brachininae, Pterostichinae and Assam Agricultural University, Licininae) were identified by following published Keys and literature and described on the basis of Jorhat, Assam, India observed morphological characters. Among these species, 3 under Clivina viz., C. assamensis, C. memnonia, C. lobata and 2 under Scarites, Harpalus and Pherosophus each viz., S. indus, S. inconspicuous, H. rufipes, H. calceatus, P. occipitalis and Pherosophus sp. From Pterostichus, Chlaenius and Sparostes, there was one species of each genus viz., Pterostichus madidus, C. bimaculatus and Sparostes striatulus. Highest collection of carabids were obtained from pitfall trap (46%) followed by light trap (42%).
    [Show full text]
  • Biting Diptera of Medical Importance in Kansas
    BITING DIPTERA OF MEDICAL IMPORTANCE IN KANSAS WILLIAM WOOi) YOUNG B. S., Kansas Stat* College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1951 A THBSIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Entomology KANSAS STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE 1958 nrr y<*& DoCU»*^"s TABLE OF CONTESTS Km INTRODUCTION 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2 Kansas Mosquitoes . 2 Kansas Tabanids 3 Kansas Black Flies 4 Kansas Biting Midges ........ ..... 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 7 MOSQUITOES (CULICIDAE, DIPTERA) 9 Family Culicidae 9 Subfamily Culloinae 10 Control of Mosquitoes 65 TABANIDS (TABANIDAE, DIPTERA) 67 Family Tabanidae 67 Subfamily Pangoniinae 70 Subfamily Tabaninae Bl Control of Tabanids 106 BLACK FLIES (SBflJLIIDAE, DIPTERA) 107 Family Simuliidae 107 Genus Cnephia 108 Canus Simulium 109 Control of Black Flies llj BITHO MIDQBS (CERATOPOOQNIDAE, DIPTERA) 114 Family Ceratopogonidae 114 Genus Culiooides 114 Control of Biting Midges 122 SUMMARY 12j ACKSOWLBDOMEHT 125 REFERENCES 126 APPENDICES I33 UJTRODOCTION The oedioal iniportanoe of dipterous inaeots was realized with tha disoovery rhiri rig tha late 1800'a that mosquitoes were capable of transmit- ting malaria to nan. Since that time many diseases, auoh aa yellow fever, dengue, filariasis, varioua forms of enoephalitia, tularemia and anaplaa- ooaia, which affeot man and other apeoies of animals, hare been proved to be tranamitted by certain insects of the order Diptera. Information on the K&naaa Diptera of medical importance is scattered, for the moat part, throughout Tarioua publications. Thie paper is intended to bring together known and new information on the characterization, bio- nomioa, medical importance, distribution in Kansas and the United States, and the oontrol of the Kansas apeoies of medically important inaeeta.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth Northwest Forests'
    AMER. ZOOL., 33:578-587 (1993) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth mon et al., 1990; Hz Northwest Forests complex litter layer 1973; Lattin, 1990; JOHN D. LATTIN and other features Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, tural diversity of th Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2907 is reflected by the 14 found there (Lawtt SYNOPSIS. Old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest extend along the 1990; Parsons et a. e coastal region from southern Alaska to northern California and are com- While these old posed largely of conifer rather than hardwood tree species. Many of these ity over time and trees achieve great age (500-1,000 yr). Natural succession that follows product of sever: forest stand destruction normally takes over 100 years to reach the young through successioi mature forest stage. This succession may continue on into old-growth for (Lattin, 1990). Fire centuries. The changing structural complexity of the forest over time, and diseases, are combined with the many different plant species that characterize succes- bances. The prolot sion, results in an array of arthropod habitats. It is estimated that 6,000 a continually char arthropod species may be found in such forests—over 3,400 different ments and habitat species are known from a single 6,400 ha site in Oregon. Our knowledge (Southwood, 1977 of these species is still rudimentary and much additional work is needed Lawton, 1983). throughout this vast region. Many of these species play critical roles in arthropods have lx the dynamics of forest ecosystems. They are important in nutrient cycling, old-growth site, tt as herbivores, as natural predators and parasites of other arthropod spe- mental Forest (HJ cies.
    [Show full text]
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract
    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Cuticular Hydrocarbon
    FACTORS AFFECTING CUTICULAR HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF FIELD POPULATIONS OF TABANUS MULARIS STONE (DIPTERA: TABANIDAE) IN OKLAHOMA By ROBERT A. MIHALOVICH Bachelor of Arts Washington and Jefferson College Washington, Pennsylvania 1993 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 1996 FACTORS AFFECTING CUTICULAR HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF FIELD POPULATIONS OF TABANUS MULARIS STONE (DIPTERA: TABANIDAE) IN OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Russell Wright and the Department of Entomology for.their generous support throughout the course of this project. I also thank Dr. Richard Berberet for serving as a member of my committee. Very special thanks goes to Dr. Jack DiUwith for his invaluable assistance and to Dr. William Warde and the late Dr. W. Scott Fargo for helping me with the statistical analysis. I also express my appreciation to Lisa Cobum and Richard Grantham for all of their valuable time and assistance. A very special word of thanks goes to Sarah McLean for her thoughtfulness, support and data processing ability. Most of all, my deepest appreciation goes to my parents Robert and Barbara and my family and friends who supported me throughout this study. I dedicate this work to the memory of my grandfather Slim, and my uncle Nick who were always an inspiration !o me. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION.................................................... 1 II. LITERATURE REVIEW. ...... .. .......... .. ...... ... ............... .. 3 Tabanus mularis Complex. ................................. 3 Cuticular Hydrocarbons.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Diversity
    VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AS INDICATORS OF GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) DIVERSITY BY ALAN D. YANAHAN THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Dr. Steven J. Taylor, Chair, Director of Research Adjunct Assistant Professor Sam W. Heads Associate Professor Andrew V. Suarez ABSTRACT Formally assessing biodiversity can be a daunting if not impossible task. Subsequently, specific taxa are often chosen as indicators of patterns of diversity as a whole. Mapping the locations of indicator taxa can inform conservation planning by identifying land units for management strategies. For this approach to be successful, though, land units must be effective spatial representations of the species assemblages present on the landscape. In this study, I determined whether land units classified by vegetative communities predicted the community structure of a diverse group of invertebrates—the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Specifically, that (1) land units of the same classification contained similar carabid species assemblages and that (2) differences in species structure were correlated with variation in land unit characteristics, including canopy and ground cover, vegetation structure, tree density, leaf litter depth, and soil moisture. The study site, the Braidwood Dunes and Savanna Nature Preserve in Will County, Illinois is a mosaic of differing land units. Beetles were sampled continuously via pitfall trapping across an entire active season from 2011–2012. Land unit characteristics were measured in July 2012. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinated the land units by their carabid assemblages into five ecologically meaningful clusters: disturbed, marsh, prairie, restoration, and savanna.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Dedicated to Information About the Chrysomelidae Report No
    CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 55 March 2017 ICE LEAF BEETLE SYMPOSIUM, 2016 Fig. 1. Chrysomelid colleagues at meeting, from left: Vivian Flinte, Adelita Linzmeier, Caroline Chaboo, Margarete Macedo and Vivian Sandoval (Story, page 15). LIFE WITH PACHYBRACHIS Inside This Issue 2- Editor’s page, submissions 3- 2nd European Leaf Beetle Meeting 4- Intromittant organ &spermathecal duct in Cassidinae 6- In Memoriam: Krishna K. Verma 7- Horst Kippenberg 14- Central European Leaf Beetle Meeting 11- Life with Pachybrachis 13- Ophraella communa in Italy 16- 2014 European leaf beetle symposium 17- 2016 ICE Leaf beetle symposium 18- In Memoriam: Manfred Doberl 19- In Memoriam: Walter Steinhausen 22- 2015 European leaf beetle symposium 23- E-mail list Fig. 1. Edward Riley (left), Robert Barney (center) and Shawn Clark 25- Questionnaire (right) in Dunbar Barrens, Wisconsin, USA. Story, page 11 International Date Book The Editor’s Page Chrysomela is back! 2017 Entomological Society of America Dear Chrysomelid Colleagues: November annual meeting, Denver, Colorado The absence pf Chrysomela was the usual combina- tion of too few submissions, then a flood of articles in fall 2018 European Congress of Entomology, 2016, but my mix of personal and professional changes at July, Naples, Italy the moment distracted my attention. As usual, please consider writing about your research, updates, and other 2020 International Congress of Entomology topics in leaf beetles. I encourage new members to July, Helsinki, Finland participate in the newsletter. A major development in our community was the initiation of a Facebook group, Chrysomelidae Forum, by Michael Geiser. It is popular and connections grow daily.
    [Show full text]
  • B a N I S T E R I A
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Name Here
    RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEAD WOOD AND ARTHROPODS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by MICHAEL DARRAGH ULYSHEN (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT The importance of dead wood to maintaining forest diversity is now widely recognized. However, the habitat associations and sensitivities of many species associated with dead wood remain unknown, making it difficult to develop conservation plans for managed forests. The purpose of this research, conducted on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina, was to better understand the relationships between dead wood and arthropods in the southeastern United States. In a comparison of forest types, more beetle species emerged from logs collected in upland pine-dominated stands than in bottomland hardwood forests. This difference was most pronounced for Quercus nigra L., a species of tree uncommon in upland forests. In a comparison of wood postures, more beetle species emerged from logs than from snags, but a number of species appear to be dependent on snags including several canopy specialists. In a study of saproxylic beetle succession, species richness peaked within the first year of death and declined steadily thereafter. However, a number of species appear to be dependent on highly decayed logs, underscoring the importance of protecting wood at all stages of decay. In a study comparing litter-dwelling arthropod abundance at different distances from dead wood, arthropods were more abundant near dead wood than away from it. In another study, ground- dwelling arthropods and saproxylic beetles were little affected by large-scale manipulations of dead wood in upland pine-dominated forests, possibly due to the suitability of the forests surrounding the plots.
    [Show full text]