New Domains in Automatic Mechanism Generation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Domains in Automatic Mechanism Generation NEW DOMAINS IN AUTOMATIC MECHANISM GENERATION A Dissertation Presented By Belinda Leigh Slakman To The Department of Chemical Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Field of Chemical Engineering Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August 2017 ii Abstract Deeper understanding of complex chemical systems can be aided by detailed kinetic mod- eling, in which processes are broken down into their individual elementary reactions. An important industrial goal is to move from postdictive to predictive modeling, where new chemical vapor deposition (CVD) precursors, for example, can be tested for efficiency without performing tedious and expensive experiments. Some of these microkinetic mod- els may contain hundreds of reacting chemical species, and thousands of reactions; thus, it is desirable to build the models automatically with a computer to speed up model gen- eration and reduce errors. Automatic mechanism generation is now commonly used for applications such as combustion, but extension to other systems presents challenges. This dissertation describes the extension of the Reaction Mechanism Generator (RMG) soft- ware to two less-studied chemical systems: the oxidation of liquid fuels and the gas-phase decomposition of silicon hydrides. To model liquid fuel oxidation, the software’s existing gas-phase thermodynamics and kinetics databases needed to be supplemented, or corrected to account for solvated re- actions. Existing correlations and data for solvation thermodynamics and diffusion were improved and added to RMG. Solvation kinetics data were obtained by developing a ma- chine learning algorithm to systematically predict the change in barrier height when going from gas-phase to various solvents. The algorithm was trained with quantum chemistry cal- culations on a simple set of hydrogen abstraction and intra-hydrogen migration reactions. The method was used to change the rates in a model for the oxidation of dodecane/methyl oleate blends, showing a marked change in the models prediction for the fuel’s induction period. iii The second part of this dissertation involves gas-phase silicon hydride decomposi- tion, for the application to CVD. Thermodynamic and kinetic data were added from liter- ature to RMG’s database. Specifically focusing on radical reaction types, additional data were calculated via quantum chemistry for hydrogen bond increment (HBI) values of sili- con hydride species, as well as hydrogen abstraction reaction rates. A SiH4 decomposition model was built with the updated RMG and compared to experiment, with good agreement. This work provides new insight on both of these chemical systems and contributes new calculated thermodynamics and kinetics parameters. Importantly, it also guides future developers in adding capabilities for new phases or elements to mechanism generation software. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My dissertation work would not have been possible without the support of many people, near and far. Thank you to my advisor, Dr. Richard West, for supporting me these past five years. Your intelligence and insights have been invaluable, but at the same time, you have always let me run with the ideas I have had and let me make mistakes on my own- the marks of a great advisor. Thanks for giving me the opportunities to travel and present my research, teach, and mentor. I also want to thank my other committee members: Dr. Anand Asthagiri, Dr. Carolyn Lee-Parsons, Dr. Mary Jo Ondrechen, and Dr. Harsono Simka for your time and helpful discussions over the years. I would especially like to thank Harsono for mentoring me throughout two internships at Intel Corporation and beyond, and for all of your personal and professional advice. I want to thank my other colleagues at Intel, particularly Karson Knutson, Dr. Har- inath Reddy, and other members of the TCAD-IPAG group. I learned a lot from all of you, and thanks for giving me the opportunity to come back and work with you a second time. This dissertation would surely not have been possible without the hard work of past and present RMG developers in the Green Group at MIT. I would especially like to thank Dr. William Green for his insights over the years, and Dr. Amrit Jalan and Yunsie Chung for helpful discussions on solvation in RMG. This work could not have been completed without the help of Research Comput- ing at Northeastern University, especially Nilay Roy, who helped maintain the Discovery cluster. v I want to thank Michael Li, and my instructors and colleagues at The Data Incuba- tor, for teaching me about data science, and providing guidance and friendship during the spring of 2017. I would also like to acknowledge Lilian Tsang and the organizers of the Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center summer school, which I attended in 2013 and 2014. I would like to thank the current and former Northeastern Department of Chemical Engineering staff for their support: Jessica, Brandon, Francesca, Kelly, Sarah and espe- cially Pat and Rob. I also have to thank my 11 classmates and friends who started this journey with me: Chris, Dan, Hunter, Luting, Mark, Negar, Oljora, Sue, Sydney, Tanya and Taylor. To Dr. Pierre Bhoorasingh and Dr. Fariba Seyedzadeh Khanshan: I couldn’t have done this work without your guidance, good example, and levity, and thank you for the friendship and advice you continue to provide. Thank you to Jason for being our “scientist” and for all of your research assistance. I’d also like to thank Nate for letting me vent, not just about kinetics. I also want to thank current West group members Yawei, Mike, Rasha and Krishna and past members Jacob, Victor, Elliot, Claudia, and Drew for your useful discussions and companionship; it’s been a pleasure to work with all of you. I have to thank all of my friends, in Boston and beyond. In particular, I want to thank Amanda for being my roommate for 4 years, Ina for sharing in the best friendship that has ever come from Craigslist (#18westwood), Katarina for reminding me that my Ph.D. project is not the only measure of my worth, and Jennifer for judgment-free support of my decisions. Last, and most importantly, I have to thank my family, who has patiently supported me for the past 28 years. Mom, Dad, Jordan and Casey, thank you for standing with me as I take this next step. I am lucky to have such love in my life. vi Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Automatic mechanism generation . .2 1.1.1 Reaction Mechanism Generator (RMG) . .6 1.2 Parameter estimation . .9 1.2.1 Thermodynamics . .9 1.2.2 Kinetics . 11 1.2.3 Transition state geometries . 13 1.3 Machine learning with decision trees . 13 1.3.1 Decision trees in chemistry and biology . 14 1.4 Dissertation overview . 15 2 Automatic calculation of solvation thermodynamics 17 2.1 Background . 18 2.1.1 Explicit thermodynamic calculations . 18 2.1.2 Estimation techniques . 18 2.2 Methods . 21 2.2.1 Adaptation of solvation thermodynamics from RMG-Java . 22 2.2.2 New additions in RMG-Py . 23 2.3 Results . 27 2.3.1 Estimation of solute descriptors . 27 2.3.2 Calculation of solvation thermodynamics . 28 vii 2.4 Summary . 29 2.5 Recommendations . 29 2.5.1 Temperature dependence of solvation thermodynamics . 30 2.5.2 Calculation of solvation thermodynamics for lone pair species . 30 2.5.3 Improved benchmarking of group additivity values . 30 2.5.4 Expansion and enhancement of solvents . 31 3 Implementing kinetic solvent effects in automatic mechanism generation 32 3.1 Background . 33 3.1.1 Experimental techniques for determining reaction rates in liquids . 34 3.1.2 Computational chemistry . 35 3.1.3 Kinetic solvent effects within reaction families . 38 3.2 Methods . 49 3.2.1 Diffusion . 49 3.2.2 Intrinsic kinetics . 50 3.2.3 Fuel oxidation model modification . 54 3.2.4 Reactor simulations . 54 3.3 Results . 55 3.3.1 Solvation kinetics trends . 55 3.3.2 New reactor simulations . 58 3.4 Summary . 58 3.5 Recommendations . 61 3.5.1 On-the-fly estimation of solvation kinetics . 61 3.5.2 Benchmarking the estimates . 62 3.5.3 Check thermodynamic consistency with LSERs . 62 3.5.4 Data-driven approaches . 63 viii 4 Automated silicon hydride mechanism generation 66 4.1 Background . 67 4.1.1 Experimental work on SiH4 chemistry . 67 4.1.2 Detailed mechanisms for SiH4 CVD . 68 4.1.3 Importance of radical chemistry in silicon hydride thermal decom- position . 70 4.2 Methods . 70 4.2.1 RMG source code . 71 4.2.2 Updating RMG’s database . 71 4.2.3 RMG model generation . 74 4.2.4 Reactor modeling . 74 4.3 Results . 75 4.3.1 Kinetics of hydrogen abstraction reactions . 75 4.3.2 Calculated thermodynamic data . 76 4.3.3 RMG generated mechanisms . 79 4.4 Discussion . 86 4.5 Summary . 87 4.6 Recommendations . 88 4.6.1 Expansion of thermodynamic libraries for radical species . 88 4.6.2 Calculation of rates . 89 4.6.3 Sensitivity analysis . 90 4.6.4 Surface chemistry . 91 5 Conclusion 92 5.1 Liquid-phase fuel oxidation . 92 5.2 Thermal decomposition of silicon hydrides . 94 5.3 Summary . 95 ix References 96 A Supplementary Info for Solvation Kinetics 114 A.1 Solvation kinetics molecular structure group trees and values . 114 A.2 Script for modifying Chemkin files for solvation kinetics corrections . 116 A.3 Modified Cantera input file for n-dodecane/ methyl oleate oxidation . 116 A.4 Cantera script to simulate liquid fuel oxidation reactor . 116 A.5 Code for automatic tree building . 116 B Supplementary Info for Silicon Hydrides 117 B.1 Geometries of reactants and transition states for hydrogen abstraction reac- tions .
Recommended publications
  • Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education
    Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education Susi Lehtola∗,y and Antti J. Karttunenz yMolecular Sciences Software Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States zDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland E-mail: [email protected].fi Abstract Long in the making, computational chemistry for the masses [J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 104] is finally here. We point out the existence of a variety of free and open source software (FOSS) packages for computational chemistry that offer a wide range of functionality all the way from approximate semiempirical calculations with tight- binding density functional theory to sophisticated ab initio wave function methods such as coupled-cluster theory, both for molecular and for solid-state systems. By their very definition, FOSS packages allow usage for whatever purpose by anyone, meaning they can also be used in industrial applications without limitation. Also, FOSS software has no limitations to redistribution in source or binary form, allowing their easy distribution and installation by third parties. Many FOSS scientific software packages are available as part of popular Linux distributions, and other package managers such as pip and conda. Combined with the remarkable increase in the power of personal devices—which rival that of the fastest supercomputers in the world of the 1990s—a decentralized model for teaching computational chemistry is now possible, enabling students to perform reasonable modeling on their own computing devices, in the bring your own device 1 (BYOD) scheme. In addition to the programs’ use for various applications, open access to the programs’ source code also enables comprehensive teaching strategies, as actual algorithms’ implementations can be used in teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Atom: a MATLAB PACKAGE for MANIPULATION of MOLECULAR SYSTEMS
    Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 67, No. 5:419–426, 2019 atom: A MATLAB PACKAGE FOR MANIPULATION OF MOLECULAR SYSTEMS MICHAEL HOLMBOE * 1Chemistry Department, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Abstract—This work presents Atomistic Topology Operations in MATLAB (atom), an open source library of modular MATLAB routines which comprise a general and flexible framework for manipulation of atomistic systems. The purpose of the atom library is simply to facilitate common operations performed for construction, manipulation, or structural analysis. Due to the data structure used, atoms and molecules can be operated upon based on different chemical names or attributes, such as atom-ormolecule-ID, name, residue name, charge, positions, etc. Furthermore, the Bond Valence Method and a neighbor-distance analysis can be performed to assign many chemical properties of inorganic molecules. Apart from reading and writing common coordinate files (.pdb, .xyz, .gro, .cif) and trajectories (.dcd, .trr, .xtc; binary formats are parsed via third-party packages), the atom library can also be used to generate topology files with bonding and angle information taking the periodic boundary conditions into account, and supports basic Gromacs, NAMD, LAMMPS, and RASPA2 topology file formats. Focusing on clay-mineral systems, the library supports CLAYFF (Cygan, 2004) but can also generate topology files for the INTERFACE forcefield (Heinz, 2005, 2013) for Gromacs and NAMD. Keywords—CLAYFF. Gromacs . INTERFACE force field . MATLAB . Molecular dynamics simulations . Monte Carlo INTRODUCTION Dombrowsky et al. 2018; Kapla & Lindén 2018; Matsunaga & Sugita 2018). This work presents the Molecular modeling is becoming increasingly important in Atomistic Topology Operations in MATLAB (atom)li- many different areas of fundamental and applied research brary – a large collection of >100 modular MATLAB (Cygan 2001;Luetal.2006; Medina, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • ES2015 Compilation of Abstracts of Invited Speakers and Contributed
    ES2015 Compilation of Abstracts of Invited Speakers and Contributed Talk Speakers MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2015 Haggett Hall, Cascade Room, University of Washington New Methods Jim Chelikowsky, U of Texas, Austin “Seeing” the covalent bond: Simulating Atomic Force Microscopy Images Alexandru Georgescu, Yale U A Generalized Slave-Particle Formalism for Extended Hubbard Models Bryan Clark, UIUC From ab-initio to model systems: tales of unusual conductivity in electronic systems at high temperatures Advances in DFT and Applications Priya Gopal, Central Michigan U Novel tools for accelerated materials discovery in the AFLOWLIB.ORG repository Ismaila Dabo, Penn State U Electronic-Structure Calculations from Koopmans-Compliant Functionals Improving the performance of ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and band structure calculations for Eric Bylaska, PNNL actinide and geochemical systems with new algorithms and new machines QMC Hao Shi, College of William & Mary Recent developments in auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo: magnetic orders and spin-orbit coupling Fengjie Ma, College of William & Mary Ground and excited state calculations of auxiliary-field Quantum Monte Carlo in solids Paul Kent, ORNL New applications of Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo Many Body Diana Qiu, UC Berkeley Many-body effects on the electronic and optical properties of quasi-two-dimensional materials Mei-Yin Chou, Academia Sinica Dirac Electrons in Silicene on Ag(111): Do they exist? Emmanuel Gull, U of Michigan Solutions of the Two Dimensional Hubbard Model TUESDAY, JUNE
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Automated Transition State Theory Calculations: Improvements on the Autotst Framework
    Advances in automated transition state theory calculations: improvements on the AutoTST framework Nathan D. Harmsa, Carl E. Underkofflera, Richard H. Westa aDepartment of Chemical Engineering Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA Abstract Kinetic modeling of combustion chemistry has made substantial progress in recent years with the development of increasingly detailed models. However, many of the chemical kinetic parameters utilized in detailed models are estimated, often inaccurately. To help replace rate estimates with more accurate calculations, we have developed AutoTST, an automated Transition State Theory rate calculator. This work describes improvements to AutoTST, including: a systematic conformer search to find an ensemble of low energy conformers, vibrational analysis to validate transition state geometries, more accurate symmetry number calculations, and a hindered rotor treatment when deriving kinetics. These improvements resulted in location of transition state geometry for 93% of cases and generation of kinetic parameters for 74% of cases. Newly calculated parameters agree well with benchmark calculations and perform well when used to replace estimated parameters in a detailed kinetic model of methanol combustion. Keywords: Transition state theory, Chemical kinetic models, Model comparison, Uncertainty 1. Introduction Detailed kinetic models allow researchers to understand the chemistry of complex phenomena in systems such as combustion and hetrogeneous catalysis, thus enabling them to make informed experimental design choices, and to design and optimize processes and devices. Microkinetic models often contain hundreds of intermediates and thousands of reactions, for which thermodynamic and kinetic parameters need to be specified [1,2]. These parameters are ideally determined experimen- tally or calculated theoretically with high accuracy, but most are estimated [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Cantherm Refresher/Overview Enoch Dames RMG Study Group Meeting Jan
    CanTherm Refresher/Overview Enoch Dames RMG Study Group Meeting Jan. 12, 2015 Online Resources: http://cheme.scripts.mit.edu/green-group/cantherm/ http://greengroup.github.io/RMG-Py/theory/measure/index.html http://cccbdb.nist.gov/ - tables of force constant scaling factors, lots of explanations and tutorials User Guide: http://greengroup.github.io/RMG-Py/users/cantherm/index.html Outline of this RMG Study Group •What is CanTherm? How is it used? •The world’s most compact overview of the theory behind rate theory packages (with emphasis on kinetics) •Running CanTherm •Complex Pdep Example Calculation, I/O components Objective of this RMG Study Group Provide basic information and conduct a brief overview of topics necessary for computing pressure dependent rates using CanTherm What is CanTherm? CanTherm is an open source python package of utilities for the computation of the following: 1. Thermodynamic properties of stable molecules (H298, S , Cp(T) ) (see Shamel’s study group presentation #5 for more) 2. High pressure limit rate coefficients, k¥ 3. Pressure dependent rate coefficients, k(T,P), for arbitrarily large multiple-well reaction networks using either Modified Strong Collision, Reservoir State or Chemically Significant Eigenvalue (CSE) approximations Notes: • CanTherm does not have a GUI • There are numerous other similar codes out there, but CanTherm has the nice feature that many molecular properties can be automatically read in from outputs of quantum chemistry jobs • If you forked over a copy of RMG-Py from Github, you have CanTherm How CanTherm Is Used Prepare jobs via GaussView, WebMO, Avagadro Molecule (open source), etc. See: Editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecule_editor Quantum Chemistry Application: Gaussian, QChem Run jobs to obtain energies, frequencies Molpro, Mopac CanTherm Compute k(T,P), thermo parameters Rate Coefficients, Thermodynamic Properties Use k(T,P), thermo parameters for science Electronic Structure and Rates: varying levels of theory 1 Tt1 = Nelec Zador et al 2010 Prog.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Chemistry (QC) on Gpus Feb
    Quantum Chemistry (QC) on GPUs Feb. 2, 2017 Overview of Life & Material Accelerated Apps MD: All key codes are GPU-accelerated QC: All key codes are ported or optimizing Great multi-GPU performance Focus on using GPU-accelerated math libraries, OpenACC directives Focus on dense (up to 16) GPU nodes &/or large # of GPU nodes GPU-accelerated and available today: ACEMD*, AMBER (PMEMD)*, BAND, CHARMM, DESMOND, ESPResso, ABINIT, ACES III, ADF, BigDFT, CP2K, GAMESS, GAMESS- Folding@Home, GPUgrid.net, GROMACS, HALMD, HOOMD-Blue*, UK, GPAW, LATTE, LSDalton, LSMS, MOLCAS, MOPAC2012, LAMMPS, Lattice Microbes*, mdcore, MELD, miniMD, NAMD, NWChem, OCTOPUS*, PEtot, QUICK, Q-Chem, QMCPack, OpenMM, PolyFTS, SOP-GPU* & more Quantum Espresso/PWscf, QUICK, TeraChem* Active GPU acceleration projects: CASTEP, GAMESS, Gaussian, ONETEP, Quantum Supercharger Library*, VASP & more green* = application where >90% of the workload is on GPU 2 MD vs. QC on GPUs “Classical” Molecular Dynamics Quantum Chemistry (MO, PW, DFT, Semi-Emp) Simulates positions of atoms over time; Calculates electronic properties; chemical-biological or ground state, excited states, spectral properties, chemical-material behaviors making/breaking bonds, physical properties Forces calculated from simple empirical formulas Forces derived from electron wave function (bond rearrangement generally forbidden) (bond rearrangement OK, e.g., bond energies) Up to millions of atoms Up to a few thousand atoms Solvent included without difficulty Generally in a vacuum but if needed, solvent treated classically
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title From NWChem to NWChemEx: Evolving with the Computational Chemistry Landscape. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sm897jh Journal Chemical reviews, 121(8) ISSN 0009-2665 Authors Kowalski, Karol Bair, Raymond Bauman, Nicholas P et al. Publication Date 2021-04-01 DOI 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California From NWChem to NWChemEx: Evolving with the computational chemistry landscape Karol Kowalski,y Raymond Bair,z Nicholas P. Bauman,y Jeffery S. Boschen,{ Eric J. Bylaska,y Jeff Daily,y Wibe A. de Jong,x Thom Dunning, Jr,y Niranjan Govind,y Robert J. Harrison,k Murat Keçeli,z Kristopher Keipert,? Sriram Krishnamoorthy,y Suraj Kumar,y Erdal Mutlu,y Bruce Palmer,y Ajay Panyala,y Bo Peng,y Ryan M. Richard,{ T. P. Straatsma,# Peter Sushko,y Edward F. Valeev,@ Marat Valiev,y Hubertus J. J. van Dam,4 Jonathan M. Waldrop,{ David B. Williams-Young,x Chao Yang,x Marcin Zalewski,y and Theresa L. Windus*,r yPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 zArgonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439 {Ames Laboratory, Ames, IA 50011 xLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, 94720 kInstitute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794 ?NVIDIA Inc, previously Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439 #National Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6373 @Department of Chemistry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 4Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 rDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University and Ames Laboratory, Ames, IA 50011 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract Since the advent of the first computers, chemists have been at the forefront of using computers to understand and solve complex chemical problems.
    [Show full text]
  • RMG-Py and Cantherm Documentation ⇌Release 2.0.0
    RMG RMG-Py and CanTherm Documentation ⇌Release 2.0.0 William H. Green, Richard H. West, and the RMG Team Sep 16, 2016 CONTENTS 1 RMG User’s Guide 3 1.1 Introduction...............................................3 1.2 Release Notes..............................................4 1.3 Overview of Features...........................................6 1.4 Installation................................................7 1.5 Creating Input Files........................................... 20 1.6 Example Input Files........................................... 29 1.7 Running a Job.............................................. 36 1.8 Analyzing the Output Files........................................ 37 1.9 Species Representation.......................................... 38 1.10 Group Representation.......................................... 39 1.11 Databases................................................. 39 1.12 Thermochemistry Estimation...................................... 58 1.13 Kinetics Estimation........................................... 63 1.14 Liquid Phase Systems.......................................... 65 1.15 Guidelines for Building a Model..................................... 72 1.16 Standalone Modules........................................... 73 1.17 Frequently Asked Questions....................................... 81 1.18 Credits.................................................. 82 1.19 How to Cite................................................ 82 2 CanTherm User’s Guide 83 2.1 Introduction..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • RMG-Py API Reference ⇌Release 2.0.0
    RMG RMG-Py API Reference ⇌Release 2.0.0 William H. Green, Richard H. West, and the RMG Team Sep 16, 2016 CONTENTS 1 RMG API Reference 3 1.1 CanTherm (rmgpy.cantherm).....................................3 1.2 Chemkin files (rmgpy.chemkin).................................... 10 1.3 Physical constants (rmgpy.constants)................................ 13 1.4 Database (rmgpy.data)......................................... 13 1.5 Kinetics (rmgpy.kinetics)...................................... 64 1.6 Molecular representations (rmgpy.molecule)............................. 84 1.7 Pressure dependence (rmgpy.pdep).................................. 108 1.8 QMTP (rmgpy.qm)........................................... 118 1.9 Physical quantities (rmgpy.quantity)................................. 136 1.10 Reactions (rmgpy.reaction)..................................... 140 1.11 Reaction mechanism generation (rmgpy.rmg)............................. 143 1.12 Reaction system simulation (rmgpy.solver)............................. 157 1.13 Species (rmgpy.species)....................................... 160 1.14 Statistical mechanics (rmgpy.statmech)............................... 163 1.15 Thermodynamics (rmgpy.thermo)................................... 178 Bibliography 189 Python Module Index 191 Index 193 i ii RMG-Py API Reference, Release 2.0.0 RMG is an automatic chemical reaction mechanism generator that constructs kinetic models composed of elementary chemical reaction steps using a general understanding of how molecules react. This is the API Reference guide
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Molecular Modeling
    Accepted Manuscript Title: Open Source Molecular Modeling Author: Somayeh Pirhadi Jocelyn Sunseri David Ryan Koes PII: S1093-3263(16)30118-8 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.07.008 Reference: JMG 6730 To appear in: Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling Received date: 4-5-2016 Accepted date: 25-7-2016 Please cite this article as: Somayeh Pirhadi, Jocelyn Sunseri, David Ryan Koes, Open Source Molecular Modeling, <![CDATA[Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling]]> (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.07.008 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Open Source Molecular Modeling Somayeh Pirhadia, Jocelyn Sunseria, David Ryan Koesa,∗ aDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh Abstract The success of molecular modeling and computational chemistry efforts are, by definition, de- pendent on quality software applications. Open source software development provides many advantages to users of modeling applications, not the least of which is that the software is free and completely extendable. In this review we categorize, enumerate, and describe available open source software packages for molecular modeling and computational chemistry. 1. Introduction What is Open Source? Free and open source software (FOSS) is software that is both considered \free software," as defined by the Free Software Foundation (http://fsf.org) and \open source," as defined by the Open Source Initiative (http://opensource.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Computational Thermochemistry for Butane Oxidation
    Automated Computational Thermochemistry for Butane Oxidation: A Prelude to Predictive Automated Combustion Kinetics Murat Keceli,1 Sarah N. Elliott,2 Yi-Pei Li,3 Matthew S. Johnson,3 Carlo Cavallotti,4 Yuri Georgievskii,1 William H. Green,3 Matteo Pelucchi,4 Justin M. Wozniak,5 Ahren W. Jasper,1 Stephen J. Klippenstein1 1 Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439, USA 2 Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA 3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA 4 Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “G. Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy 5 Math and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439, USA Corresponding Author: Stephen J. Klippenstein 9700 S. Cass Ave. Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL, 60439 USA e-mail: [email protected] Colloquium: Kinetics Paper Length: 6152 Words (Method 1) Main Text (4668); References (507), Figures (977); Fig. 1 (379); Fig. 2 (412); Fig. 3 (186). Abstract: Large scale implementation of high level computational theoretical chemical kinetics offers the prospect for dramatically improving the fidelity of combustion chemical modeling. As a first step toward this goal, we have developed a procedure for automatically generating the thermochemical data for combustion of an arbitrary fuel. The procedure begins by producing a list of combustion relevant species from a specification of the fuel and combustion conditions of interest. Then, for each element in the list of species, the procedure determines an internal coordinate z-matrix description of its structure, the optimal torsional configuration via Monte Carlo sampling, key rovibrational properties for that optimal geometry (including anharmonic corrections from torsional sampling and/or vibrational perturbation theory), and high level estimates of the electronic and zero-point energies via arbitrarily defined composite methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Modeling of API Oxidation: 1. the AIBN/H2O/CH3OH Radical "Soup"
    Kinetic Modeling of API Oxidation: 1. The AIBN/H2O/CH3OH Radical "Soup" Alon Grinberg Danaa,b, Haoyang Wua, Duminda S. Ranasinghea, Frank C. Pickard IVc, Geoffrey P. F. Woodc, Todd Zeleskyc, Gregory W. Sluggettc, Jason Mustakisc, William H. Greena,∗ aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States bWolfson Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel cPfizer Global Research & Development, Groton Laboratories, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, United States Abstract Stress testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) is an important tool used to gauge chemical stabil- ity and identify potential degradation products. While different flavors of API stress testing systems have been used in experimental investigations for decades, the detailed kinetics of such systems as well as the chemical composition of prominent reactive species, specifically reactive oxygen species, are unknown. As a first step toward understanding and modeling API oxidation in stress testing, we investigated a typical radical "soup" solution an API is subject to during stress testing. Here we applied ab-initio electronic structure calculations to automatically generate and refine a detailed chemical kinetics model, taking a fresh look at API oxidation. We generated a detailed kinetic model for a representative azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN)/H2O/CH3OH stress-testing system with varied co-solvent ratio (50%/50% – 99.5%/0.5% vol. wa- ter/methanol) and for representative pH values (4–10) at 40 ℃ stirred and open to the atmosphere. At acidic conditions hydroxymethyl alkoxyl is the dominant alkoxyl radical, and at basic conditions, for most studied initial methanol concentrations, cyanoisopropyl alkoxyl becomes the dominant alkoxyl radical, albeit at an overall lower concentration.
    [Show full text]