DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution Patterns of Tidepool Fishes on a Tropical Flat Reef 307

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution Patterns of Tidepool Fishes on a Tropical Flat Reef 307 305 Abstract—Rockpools on a tropical Distribution patterns of tidepool fishes flat reef off the southeastern coast of Brazil were sampled to determine the on a tropical flat reef influence of pool morphometry and water characteristics on fish com- munity structure. The pool closest to Raphael M. Macieira (contact author) the inner fringe of the reef had lower Jean-Christophe Joyeux salinity and higher temperature due Email address for contact author: [email protected] to inflow of groundwater. The other pools varied only with respect to their Laboratório de Ictiologia morphometric characteristics, algal Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia cover, and bottom composition. Spe- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo cies with a strong affinity for estu- Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514 arine-like waters characterized the Goiabeiras, 29075-910 pool closest to the beach and distin- Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil guished its fish community from that of the other pools. Instead of being strongly structured by the physico- chemical setting and position in the reef, fish communities of the other pools were determined by behavioral Habitually, at low tide most fishes of ated (Faria and Almada, 2001, 2006; preferences and intra- and inter- the intertidal zone are concentrated Arakaki and Tokeshi, 2010; Rojas and specific interactions. Differences in in tidepools. There, physicochemical Ojeda, 2010). community structure were related to (e.g., temperature and salinity) and In flat reefs, there are no signifi- pool size (the larger sizes permitting biological (e.g., recruitment) variables cant differences in vertical position the permanency of schooling species), are inherently related to the duration of pools and in wave impact on pools to algal cover (which allowed camou- of pool isolation from the sea (Gibson, and, consequentially, the duration of flage for large predatory species), to 1986). Thus, isolation has been sug- isolation from the sea is similar for all bottom composition (which provided substrate for turf flora available to gested to be a determinant for the pools (e.g., Mahon and Mahon, 1994). territorial herbivores), and to eco- establishment and maintenance of a In such a situation, pool morphometry logical effects (e.g., competition, ter- fish community (e.g., Gibson, 1972) probably is the most influential fac- ritoriality, and predation). Although and has become one of the “templates” tor on the distribution of fishes. The distribution patterns of tidepool onto which fish distribution patterns relative evenness of physicochemical fishes have previously been related are established, either partially or factors among pools enables a stan- to the availability of niches, indepen- totally (Zander et al., 1999). However, dardization of the species filter (i.e., dent of pool position in the reef, our factors such as surface area or water one or more environmental factors results show synergistic interactions volume also influence community com- that impede species occurrence), and between water properties, presence position and structure (Mahon and differences among pools will be due or absence of niches, and ecological relationships in structuring tidepool Mahon, 1994). For instance, larger, more to differences in the availability fish communities. deeper pools allow the permanency of of resources (e.g., food, mates, space, more stenotopic species (Gibson and protection) and microhabitat. How- Yoshiyama, 1999). Therefore, the dis- ever, despite offering an opportunity tribution of fishes is to some extent to study these effects without overly “azonal” (i.e., pool height within the confounding factors, flat reef areas intertidal zone is not necessarily have been little studied in respect to the single or even the main deter- the spatial distribution of their inter- minant for fish distribution) because tidal fishes (Mahon and Mahon, 1994; the occurrence of each species is more Zander et al., 1999). Thus, how pool dependent upon pool characteristics size and shape (depth and volume) than upon the vertical position of the and substrate complexity interact pool on the rocky shore (Zander et al., to affect community composition re- 1999). On the other hand, the syner- mains poorly understood. Therefore, gistic effects between pool morphom- our objectives were to investigate the etry and pool isolation have obscured effects of the physicochemical setting the distinction of their respective (temperature and salinity) and mor- Manuscript submitted 24 November 2010. Manuscript accepted 6 May 2011. contributions to the spatial distribu- phometric characteristics of pools on Fish. Bull. 109:305–315 (2011). tion of fishes (Bennett and Griffiths, the structure of fish communities on 1984). As a consequence, the influ- a flat reef, without the interactive The views and opinions expressed ence of ecological aspects like compe- effects caused by differences in the or implied in this article are those of the author (or authors) and do not necessarily tition, predation, or niche availability duration of isolation of the rockpools. reflect the position of the National Marine on shaping tidepool fish distributions In comparison with a “classic” rocky Fisheries Service, NOAA. may thus far be inadequately evalu- shore (with varying duration of isola- 306 Fishery Bulletin 109(3) 01 05 02 20°49′S 04 03 06 Equator Flat Reef 0° Atlantic Atlantic Ocean Ocean Brazil N N 23°S Capricorn ➤ ➤ Tropic 40°36′W Figure 1 Location of study area (Praia dos Castelhanos) off the coast of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The spatial distribution of the rockpools on the reef flat is shown in the map on the right. tion from the sea; e.g., Gibson, 1972), the abundance located near the sand beach (pools 1 and 2), two in an and distribution of fishes on a flat reef are expected intermediary position (pools 3 and 4), and two closer to to be affected by less complex interactions between the water edge (pools 5 and 6; Fig. 1). The mean time environmental and ecological variables and that there of exposure to air was about three hours per day. The would be a lower disparity in fish community structure height of the reef flat was located at about 6 cm (pool 2), among pools. Such natural simplification of environ- 11 cm (pool 3), 10 cm (pool 4), 20 cm (pool 5), and 13 cm mental complexity could also shed some light on how (pool 6), below that near pool 1. The pools were charac- the current tendency of habitat homogenization driven terized on a single occasion relative to their surface area, by modern anthropogenic activities (Thompson et al., depth, and bottom rugosity. Surface area was estimated 2002) may affect the divergence of fish communities by using a 3 × 1-m grid of 10 × 10-cm squares. Depth was (Villéger et al., 2010). measured with a ruler at randomly chosen intersections of the grid. Volume was derived from surface area and mean depth. Rugosity was measured by the chain-and- Materials and methods tape technique (Wilding et al., 2010). Study area Sampling The study was conducted at Praia dos Castelhanos Sampling was conducted every three months between (20º49′S, 40º36′W), in the state of Espírito Santo in August 2005 and June 2007 (n=8) during the mornings southeastern Brazil (Fig. 1). The mean water level rela- of two consecutive days. During the first day, water tive to the reference datum of zero-level of Brazilian temperature and salinity were measured with a mercury marine charts is 0.82 m. The reef is a complex of carbon- thermometer (0.5°C precision) and a refractometer (1 psu ate material composed of encrusting coralline algae and precision). Measurements were taken at three separate stony coral skeletons with sparse lateritic (ferruginous) times in each pool: immediately after isolation of the rocks and is essentially flat. During the ebb tide a large pool from the sea (“beginning”); when the water level fell number of pools become isolated. Pool substrates often below reef level (“middle”); and at the time correspond- consist of sand and gravel and pool walls are charac- ing to the lowest level of the tide and immediately before teristically irregular, almost vertical, and are covered the pool was connected to the rising sea (“end”). Algal by algal turf, soft macro-algae, crustose coralline algae, cover and bottom composition were visually estimated encrusting soft-coral, and a few stony corals. on a scale ranging between 0 and 100 (Bennett and Griffiths, 1984). Algal cover was estimated only for pool Morphological characterizations of tidepools walls and consolidated bottom areas and refers exclu- sively to macroalgae. Substrate types were categorized Six isolated tidepools (without connectivity to the sea as sand (less than 1 mm diameter), gravel, or rock (diam- or other pools during the ebb tide) were selected: two eter greater than 50 mm), and the sum of all categories Macieira and Joyeux: Distribution patterns of tidepool fishes on a tropical flat reef 307 Table 1 Morphometric characteristics, substrate composition, macroalgae cover, and physicochemical parameters of pools at Praia dos Castelhanos, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Pools were characterized once for depth, surface area, volume, and rugosity and every three months between August 2005 and June 2007 for substrate, cover, and physicochemical parameters (n=8 for all pools except pool 1 where n=7). *=mean (range: minimum–maximum). Depth (max)=mean depth (and maximum depth); area=surface area; vol.=volume; rug.=rugosity. Morphometric characteristics Substrate Cover Physico-chemical parameters Depth (max.) Area Vol. Sand Gravel Rock Algae Temperature* Pool cm m2 m3 Rug. % % % % °C Salinity* 1 8.30 (20.5) 6.35 0.53 1.11 30 10 60 20 26.1 (22.5-35.0) 28.1 (17.0–35.8) 2 22.2 (36.3) 10.15 2.24 1.19 80 10 10 40 24.4 (21.5–29.6) 34.3 (32.0–38.0) 3 17.4 (25.5) 1.36 0.24 1.26 30 60 10 40 24.8 (22.0–30.1) 34.3 (31.4–37.0) 4 28.2 (49.0) 7.88 2.22 1.30 40 20 40 70 24.2 (21.8–29.7) 34.5 (32.0–37.0) 5 23.8 (46.0) 16.12 3.81 1.20 10 10 80 30 24.7 (22.2–28.0) 34.8 (31.3–39.0) 6 25.6 (51.0) 6.52 1.67 1.27 20 50 30 40 24.5 (22.2–24.9) 34.7 (31.0–38.0) corresponded to 100% of bottom cover.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meadow Pond Final Report 1-28-10
    Comparison of Restoration Techniques to Reduce Dominance of Phragmites australis at Meadow Pond, Hampton New Hampshire FINAL REPORT January 28, 2010 David M. Burdick1,2 Christopher R. Peter1 Gregg E. Moore1,3 Geoff Wilson4 1 - Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 2 – Natural Resources and the Environment, UNH 3 – Department of Biological Sciences, UNH 4 – Northeast Wetland Restoration, Berwick ME 03901 Submitted to: New Hampshire Coastal Program New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services 50 International Drive Pease Tradeport Portsmouth, NH 03801 UNH Burdick et al. 2010 Executive Summary The northern portion of Meadow Pond Marsh remained choked with an invasive exotic variety of Phragmites australis (common reed) in 2002, despite tidal restoration in 1995. Our project goal was to implement several construction techniques to reduce the dominance of Phragmites and then examine the ecological responses of the system (as a whole as well as each experimental treatment) to inform future restoration actions at Meadow Pond. The construction treatments were: creeks, creeks and pools, sediment excavation with a large pool including native marsh plantings. Creek construction increased tides at all treatments so that more tides flooded the marsh and the highest spring tides increased to 30 cm. Soil salinity increased at all treatment areas following restoration, but also increased at control areas, so greater soil salinity could not be attributed to the treatments. Decreases in Phragmites cover were not statistically significant, but treatment areas did show significant increases in native vegetation following restoration. Fish habitat was also increased by creek and pool construction and excavation, so that pool fish density increased from 1 to 40 m-2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Trophic Ecology of Hydrothermal Vent Fauna Associated with Tubeworm Assemblages on the Juan De Fuca Ridge
    Biogeosciences, 15, 2629–2647, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Biodiversity and trophic ecology of hydrothermal vent fauna associated with tubeworm assemblages on the Juan de Fuca Ridge Yann Lelièvre1,2, Jozée Sarrazin1, Julien Marticorena1, Gauthier Schaal3, Thomas Day1, Pierre Legendre2, Stéphane Hourdez4,5, and Marjolaine Matabos1 1Ifremer, Centre de Bretagne, REM/EEP, Laboratoire Environnement Profond, 29280 Plouzané, France 2Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada 3Laboratoire des Sciences de l’Environnement Marin (LEMAR), UMR 6539 9 CNRS/UBO/IRD/Ifremer, BP 70, 29280, Plouzané, France 4Sorbonne Université, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France 5CNRS, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France Correspondence: Yann Lelièvre ([email protected]) Received: 3 October 2017 – Discussion started: 12 October 2017 Revised: 29 March 2018 – Accepted: 7 April 2018 – Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract. Hydrothermal vent sites along the Juan de Fuca community structuring. Vent food webs did not appear to be Ridge in the north-east Pacific host dense populations of organised through predator–prey relationships. For example, Ridgeia piscesae tubeworms that promote habitat hetero- although trophic structure complexity increased with ecolog- geneity and local diversity. A detailed description of the ical successional stages, showing a higher number of preda- biodiversity and community structure is needed to help un- tors in the last stages, the food web structure itself did not derstand the ecological processes that underlie the distribu- change across assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical and Horizontal Trophic Networks in the Aroid-Infesting Insect Community of Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve, Mexico
    insects Article Vertical and Horizontal Trophic Networks in the Aroid-Infesting Insect Community of Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve, Mexico Guadalupe Amancio 1 , Armando Aguirre-Jaimes 1, Vicente Hernández-Ortiz 1,* , Roger Guevara 2 and Mauricio Quesada 3,4 1 Red de Interacciones Multitróficas, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz 91073, Mexico 2 Red de Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz 91073, Mexico 3 Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia 58190 Michoacán, Mexico 4 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia 58190 Michoacán, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 June 2019; Accepted: 9 August 2019; Published: 15 August 2019 Abstract: Insect-aroid interaction studies have focused largely on pollination systems; however, few report trophic interactions with other herbivores. This study features the endophagous insect community in reproductive aroid structures of a tropical rainforest of Mexico, and the shifting that occurs along an altitudinal gradient and among different hosts. In three sites of the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve in Mexico, we surveyed eight aroid species over a yearly cycle. The insects found were reared in the laboratory, quantified and identified. Data were analyzed through species interaction networks. We recorded 34 endophagous species from 21 families belonging to four insect orders. The community was highly specialized at both network and species levels. Along the altitudinal gradient, there was a reduction in richness and a high turnover of species, while the assemblage among hosts was also highly specific, with different dominant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Large Marine Ecosystems in Response to Global Climate Change
    Sherman et al. ICESCM 2007/D:20 ICES CM 2007/D:20 Variability of Large Marine Ecosystems in response to global climate change K. Sherman, I. Belkin, J. O’Reilly and K. Hyde Kenneth Sherman, John O’Reilly, Kimberly Hyde USDOC/NOAA, NMFS Narragansett Laboratory 28 Tarzwell Drive Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 USA +1 401-782-3210 phone +1 401 782-3201 FAX [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Igor Belkin Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 215 South Ferry Road Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 USA +1 401 874-6728 phone +1 401 874-6728 FAX [email protected] Abstract: A fifty year time series of sea surface temperature (SST) and time series on fishery yields are examined for emergent patterns relative to climate change. More recent SeaWiFS derived chlorophyll and primary productivity data were also included in the examination. Of the 64 LMEs examined, 61 showed an emergent pattern of SST increases from 1957 to 2006, ranging from mean annual values of 0.08°C to 1.35°C. The rate of surface warming in LMEs from 1957 to 2006 is 4 to 8 times greater than the recent estimate of the Japan Meteorological Society’s COBE estimate for the world oceans. Effects of SST warming on fisheries, climate change, and trophic cascading are examined. Concern is expressed on the possible effects of surface layer warming in relation to thermocline formation and possible inhibition of vertical nutrient mixing within the water column in relation to bottom up effects of chlorophyll and primary productivity on global fisheries resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Plant Dominance
    Measuring Plant Dominance I. Definition = measure of the relative importance of a plant species with repsect to the degree of influence that the species exerts on the other components (e.g., other plants, animal, soils) of the community. A. Influence based on competition for resources (e.g., light, water, nutrients) B. Difficult to measure influence below ground so dominance is usually estimated with above ground characteristics. II. Types of Dominance A. Aspect dominance: 1. Tallest layer is the dominant layer (reduces climatic extremes by intercepting light and precipitation, reducing wind velocity, and retaining heat). 2. Limitation: Ignores an understory that may be changing while the dominant plant remains the same B. Sociologic dominance 1. Used when interested in understory dominance. (Often used when overstory is constant and unchanging). 2. Limitation: doesn’t work well in systems with diverse overstory species C. Relative dominance 1. Examines the dominant species in each layer of the plant community 2. Useful for multiple use management (overcomes limitations of first two types) III. Why monitory dominance? A. Dominant species are often used to identify or classify and ecological type (e.g., Art.tri/Agr.spi. habitat type). B. If the dominant spp are identified, one can predict changes that may occur in response to long-term precipitation changes or disease. C. If the dominant spp are identified, management options can be more clearly understood. D. Can be used in long-term monitoring programs to determine if management or preservation regimes are positively affecting the ecosystem. IV. Evaluating dominance: A. Can be a single species, a group of species, or and entire growth form B.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes: Ann, Gilchrist, Grove, Leven, Reno, Villard, Smith)
    Status and Trend Monitoring Summary for Selected Pope and Douglas County, Minnesota Lakes 2000 (Lakes: Ann, Gilchrist, Grove, Leven, Reno, Villard, Smith) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental Outcomes Division Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Section Andrea Plevan and Steve Heiskary September 2001 Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10 percent fibers from paper recycled by consumers. This material may be made available in other formats, including Braille, large format and audiotape. MPCA Status and Trend Monitoring Summary for 2000 Pope County Lakes Part 1: Purpose of study and background information on MN lakes The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) core lake-monitoring programs include the Citizen Lake Monitoring Program (CLMP), the Lake Assessment Program (LAP), and the Clean Water Partnership (CWP) Program. In addition to these programs, the MPCA annually monitors numerous lakes to provide baseline water quality data, provide data for potential LAP and CWP lakes, characterize lake conditions in different regions of the state, examine year-to-year variability in ecoregion reference lakes, and provide additional trophic status data for lakes exhibiting trends in Secchi transparency. In the latter case, we attempt to determine if the trends in Secchi transparency are “real,” i.e., if supporting trophic status data substantiate whether a change in trophic status has occurred. The lake sampling efforts also provide a means to respond to citizen concerns about protecting or improving the lake in cases where no data exists to evaluate the quality of the lake. For efficient sampling, we tend to select geographic clusters of lakes (e.g., focus on a specific county) whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Dominance: a Behavioral Mechanism for Resource Allocation in Crayfish
    SOCIAL DOMINANCE: A BEHAVIORAL MECHANISM FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN CRAYFISH Kandice Christine Fero A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2008 Committee: Paul Moore, Advisor Verner Bingman Graduate Faculty Representative Sheryl Coombs Rex Lowe Steve Vessey ii ABSTRACT Paul Moore, Advisor Social dominance is often equated with priority of access to resources and higher relative fitness. But the consequences of dominance are not always readily advantageous for an individual and therefore, testing of such assumptions is needed in order to appropriately characterize mechanisms of resource competition in animal systems. This dissertation examined the ecological consequences of dominance in crayfish. Specifically, the following questions were addressed: is resource allocation determined by dominance and how does the structure of resources in an environment affect dominance relationships? By examining the mechanism of how dominance may allocate resources in groups of crayfish, we can begin to answer questions concerning what environmental selective pressures are shaping social behavior in this system. Shelter acquisition and use was examined in a combination of natural, semi-natural, and laboratory studies in order to observe dominance relationships under ecologically relevant conditions. The work presented here shows that: (1) social status has persisting behavioral consequences with regard to shelter use, which are modulated by social context; (2) dominance relationships influence the spatial distribution of crayfish in natural environments such that dominant individuals possess access to more space; (3) resource use strategies differ depending on social history and these strategies may influence larger scale segregation across habitats; and finally, (4) shelter distribution modulates the extent to which social history and shelter ownership influence the formation of subsequent dominance relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems Peter M
    : . - : :: : . .. :: .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ...... ........ .. .... ..... ...... .. ... ... .... ... ..:. : .: :. : :::. ..:. :. .. ...5 .::.X'jC:' jj : 00 ,: ;; ;dA SV D ) 0 Sa C::: dS:: : :'; .SS;d. ;id)fV A .:Q ....;: ..:: ....; .: .: ..0 .....:: Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems Peter M. Vitousek, HaroldA. Mooney, Jane Lubchenco, Jerry M. Melillo Humanalteration of Earthis substantialand growing. Between one-thirdand one-half interactwith the atmosphere,with aquatic of the land surface has been transformedby human action; the carbon dioxide con- systems,and with surroundingland. More- centrationin the atmosphere has increased by nearly30 percent since the beginningof over, land transformationinteracts strongly the IndustrialRevolution; more atmospheric nitrogen is fixed by humanitythan by all with most other componentsof global en- naturalterrestrial sources combined;more than halfof all accessible surface fresh water vironmentalchange. is put to use by humanity;and about one-quarterof the birdspecies on Earthhave been The measurementof land transforma- drivento extinction. By these and other standards, it is clear that we live on a human- tion on a globalscale is challenging;chang- dominated planet. es can be measuredmore or less straightfor- wardly at a given site, but it is difficult to aggregatethese changesregionally and glo- bally. In contrastto analysesof human al- Aii organismsmodify their environment, reasonablywell quantified;all are ongoing. teration of the global carbon cycle, we and humans are no exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Abundances, Guild Dominance Patterns, and Community Structure of Breeding Riparian Birds
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Species Abundances, Guild Dominance Patterns, and Community Structure of Breeding Riparian Birds Deborah M. Finch RocWy Mountain Fqre8t and Range Exper1:rnent Station 222 South r Street Laramie, WY 82070 Abstract: I investigated trends in bird species populations, guild structure, and bird communities along a riparian altitudinal cline in the Medicine Bow National Forest of southeastern Wyom­ ing. Streamside habitats were divided into three elevational zones: low-elevation (2050 to 2260 m) cottonwood zone, mid-elevation (2290 to 2530 m) mixed shrub willow zone, and high­ elevation (2590 to 2990 m) subalpine willow zone. Vegetational complexity decreased from low to high zones, with loss of vertical habitat layers and increased foliage density and dominance of dwarf willows. Ground and lower-canopy foragers dominated all three zones, but upper-eanopy foragers, aerial foragers, and bark foragers declined in numbers with increased elevation, alto­ gether disappearing in the subalpine zone. Highest similarities within foraging guilds were between low- and mid-elevation zones, whereas fewest guild species were shared between low­ and high-elevation zones. Trends in avian numbers were explained by relating guild occupancy patterns to the presence or absence of habitat layers in each elevational zone. Greater habitat stratification in low-elevation cottonwood communities resulted in greater capability to support avian species. INTRODUCTION In the western United States, bird species diversity and bird densities are greater in riparian habitats than in surrounding upland vegetation or in most other north temperate terrestrial habitats (Carothers et al., 1974; Gaines, 1977; Knopf, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Food Webs & Lake Management
    New Approaches Microbial Food Webs & Lake Management Karl Havens and John Beaver cientists and managers organism’s position in the food web. X magnification under a microscope) dealing with the open water Organisms occurring at lower trophic are prokaryotic cells that represent one (pelagic) region of lakes and levels (e.g., bacteria and flagellates) of the first and simplest forms of life reservoirs often focus on two are near the “bottom” of the food web, on the earth. Most are heterotrophic, componentsS when considering water where energy and nutrients first enter meaning that they require organic quality or fisheries – the suspended the ecosystem. Organisms occurring at sources of carbon, however, some can algae (phytoplankton) and the suspended higher trophic levels (e.g., zooplankton synthesize carbon by photosynthesis or animals (zooplankton). This is for good and fish) are closer to the top of the food chemosynthesis. The blue-green algae reason. Phytoplankton is the component web, i.e., near the biological destination of (cyanobacteria) actually are bacteria, but responsible for noxious algal blooms and the energy and nutrients. We also use the for the purpose of this discussion, are it often is the target of nutrient reduction more familiar term trophic state, however not considered part of the MFW because strategies or other in-lake management only in the context of degree of nutrient they function more like phytoplankton solutions such as the application of enrichment. in the grazing food chain. Flagellates algaecide. Zooplankton is the component (Figure 1c), larger in size (typically 5 that provides the food resource for Who Discovered the to 10 µm) than bacteria but still very most larval fish and for adults of many Microbial Food Web? small compared to zooplankton, are pelagic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Planktonic Food Webs: Microbial Hub Approach
    Vol. 365: 289–309, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published August 18 doi: 10.3354/meps07467 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Planktonic food webs: microbial hub approach Louis Legendre1, 2,*, Richard B. Rivkin3 1UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7093, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France 2CNRS, UMR 7093, LOV, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France 3Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1C 5S7, Canada ABSTRACT: Our review consolidates published information on the functioning of the microbial heterotrophic components of pelagic food webs, and extends this into a novel approach: the ‘micro- bial hub’ (HUB). Crucial to our approach is the identification and quantification of 2 groups of organ- isms, each with distinct effects on food-web flows and biogeochemical cycles: microbes, which are generally responsible for most of the organic carbon respiration in the euphotic zone, and metazoans, which generally account for less respiration than microbes. The key characteristics of the microbial- hub approach are: all heterotrophic microbes are grouped together in the HUB, whereas larger heterotrophs are grouped into a metazoan compartment (METAZ); each food-web flow is expressed as a ratio to community respiration; summary respiration flows through, between, and from the HUB and METAZ are computed using flows from observations or models; both the HUB and METAZ receive organic carbon from several food-web sources, and redirect this carbon towards other food- web compartments and their own respiration. By using the microbial-hub approach to analyze a wide range of food webs, different zones of the world ocean, and predicted effects of climate change on food-web flows, we conclude that heterotrophic microbes always dominate respiration in the euphotic zone, even when most particulate primary production is grazed by metazoans.
    [Show full text]