DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenwood, Sue ORCID

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greenwood, Sue ORCID Greenwood, Sue ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-3585 (2018) Public space or public sphere? An examination of Facebook as a new space for political talk through online ethnographic study of citizen engagement during a UK general election. Doctoral thesis, Staffordshire University. Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4580/ Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] PUBLIC SPACE OR PUBLIC SPHERE? AN EXAMINATION OF FACEBOOK AS A NEW SPACE FOR POLITICAL TALK THROUGH ONLINE ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT DURING A UK GENERAL ELECTION SUSAN GREENWOOD A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement of Staffordshire University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2018 Copyright Sue Greenwood, 2018 i Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 1 List of tables and figures ................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 1.1 Why Facebook? ..................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Scope of research ................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Chapter outlines ..................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Facebook’s sphere of influence ........................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Theoretical and historical context .......................................................... 24 2.1 How the internet got social .................................................................................. 25 2.2 The rise of Facebook ........................................................................................... 28 2.3 Social capital and the pull of the network .......................................................... 36 2.4 A merging of online and offline worlds .............................................................. 42 2.5 Technological determinism, trajectories and the pull of the network ................. 46 2.6 Technological determinism and the Facebook effect on society ......................... 60 2.7 Political talk, the public sphere, and Facebook ................................................... 68 2.8 Facebook in the political sphere .......................................................................... 89 2.9 Towards a public sphere test for social media ..................................................... 93 2.10 Summary ............................................................................................................ 99 Chapter 3: Research strategy ................................................................................... 102 3.1 Introduction to Facebook and its difficulties ..................................................... 102 3.2 Comparable research methodology ................................................................... 114 3.3 Identifying research groups and methods .......................................................... 127 Chapter 4: Data collection and key results ............................................................. 135 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 135 4.2 Data stage one: Surveys ..................................................................................... 155 ii 4.3 Data stage two: The 2015 ethnographic study .................................................. 166 4.4 The search for enabled political talk ................................................................. 165 4.5 Data stage three: The 2017 intervention ............................................................ 182 Chapter 5: Analysis and conclusions ....................................................................... 204 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 204 5.2 Facebook as new media paradigm ..................................................................... 209 5.3 Facebook as new (social) public sphere ............................................................ 215 5.4 Facebook and political talk ................................................................................ 223 5.4.1 Want to talk, daren’t talk .................................................................... 233 5.4.2 We’re all Friends here (comfortable spaces) ...................................... 239 5.4.3 Politics over, nothing scary happened (engaged openers and supportive policers) ....................................................................................................... 244 5.4.4 Like-minded strangers ........................................................................ 267 5.4.5 Visibly there ....................................................................................... 279 5.4.6 Visibly managed ................................................................................. 293 5.6 Architectural bias ............................................................................................... 304 5.6.1 Visibility of content ............................................................................ 306 5.6.2 Pay to play .......................................................................................... 314 5.6.3 The in-between years .......................................................................... 321 5.7 Back to the public sphere future ........................................................................ 328 Chapter 6: Conclusions ............................................................................................ 333 6.1 Publications and further research ...................................................................... 340 6.2 Facebook in the public....................................................................................... 342 References ................................................................................................................. 346 Papers, journals and books ...................................................................................... 346 Media and reports .................................................................................................... 363 Author interviews .................................................................................................... 367 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 368 iii Appendix 1: Rejected (politician) survey ................................................................ 368 Appendix 2: Final Facebook users’ survey ............................................................ 377 Appendix 3: Additional comparative survey results ............................................... 390 Appendix 4: 2015 candidates lists and information ................................................ 397 Appendix 5: 2017 case study: selected posts .......................................................... 404 Acknowledgements I am grateful for the support of my supervisors during the lengthy course of this project – Professor Mick Temple, Dr Alan Russell, and Dr Carmel Thomason. Professor Temple in particular for guiding me through multiple missteps and potential wrong turns, and his continuing support, even after his retirement, was central to my being able to complete my work. I am also eternally grateful for the patience and understanding of my family and my husband, Greg Finney, in giving me the space and support I needed to work – often at the expense of time spent with them. Copyright The author, Sue Greenwood, is the copyright owner of this thesis. Please contact [email protected] regarding permissions to use or reproduce any part of it. iv Abstract: This thesis considers the place of Facebook within the public sphere by focusing on whether the social network provides new, distinct spaces for political discussion. In doing so, the study makes an original contribution to knowledge by assessing the role of Facebook in enabling or limiting political debate. It considers whether the corporate cultural development of Facebook’s architecture influences such debate, set against broader interpersonal political communication and social capital theory. While other studies have considered Facebook’s contribution to the public sphere by studying the role of the internet generally or of social media more broadly, this research focuses on Facebook itself, arguing that the scale, reach and corporate ecology of Facebook necessitates studying it as a political actor in its own right. The research hypothesised that Facebook’s corporate ambition and its global scale and dominance of online social
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gardner, Abigail S ORCID: 0000-0003-2994-741X (2019) My Story
    This is a peer-reviewed, final published version of the following document and is licensed under Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 license: Gardner, Abigail S ORCID: 0000-0003-2994-741X (2019) My Story. Digital Storytelling across Europe for Social Cohesion. Current Trends in Digital Storytelling. pp. 235-243. ISSN ISBN 978-960-99791-5-3 Official URL: https://dst.ntlab.gr/2018/proceedings/ EPrint URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/7870 Disclaimer The University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. 2018 Editors: CONFERENCE Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos Andreas Giannakoulopoulos PROCEEDINGS Michalis Meimaris Editors: Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos Assistant Professor, Department of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings
    No. 55 Wednesday 22 November 2017 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 11.30 am. Prayers 1 Questions to (1) the Minister for the Cabinet Office and the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (2) the Prime Minister 2 Clean Air Bill: Presentation (Standing Order No. 57) Geraint Davies, supported by Hilary Benn, Eleanor Smith, Tim Farron, Derek Thomas, Wera Hobhouse, John McNally, Mr David Lammy, Sir Edward Davey, Rosie Duffield, Chris Evans and Preet Kaur Gill, presented a Bill to require the Secretary of State to set, measure, enforce and report on air quality targets; to make provision about mitigating air pollution, including through the use of clean air zones; to make provision about vehicle emissions testing; to restrict the approval and sale of vehicles with certain engine types; and for connected purposes. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time Friday 1 December, and to be printed (Bill 130). 3 Financial Statement (The Chancellor of the Exchequer) 4 Budget Report Ordered, That there be laid before this House a copy of the Autumn Budget 2017.—(The Chancellor of the Exchequer.) 5 Ways and Means: Provisional collection of taxes Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 51(2)), That, pursuant to section 5 of the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act 1968, provisional statutory effect shall be given to the following motions:— (a) stamp duty land tax (higher rates for additional dwellings) (motion No. 35) (b) stamp duty land tax (relief for first time buyers) (motion No. 36) (c) tobacco products duty (rates) (motion No.
    [Show full text]
  • White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with Myspace and Facebook.” in Race After the Internet (Eds
    CITATION: boyd, danah. (2011). “White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook.” In Race After the Internet (eds. Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White). Routledge, pp. 203-222. White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook danah boyd Microsoft Research and HarVard Berkman Center for Internet and Society http://www.danah.org/ In a historic small town outside Boston, I interViewed a group of teens at a small charter school that included middle-class students seeking an alternative to the public school and poorer students who were struggling in traditional schools. There, I met Kat, a white 14-year-old from a comfortable background. We were talking about the social media practices of her classmates when I asked her why most of her friends were moVing from MySpace to Facebook. Kat grew noticeably uncomfortable. She began simply, noting that “MySpace is just old now and it’s boring.” But then she paused, looked down at the table, and continued. “It’s not really racist, but I guess you could say that. I’m not really into racism, but I think that MySpace now is more like ghetto or whatever.” – Kat On that spring day in 2007, Kat helped me finally understand a pattern that I had been noticing throughout that school year. Teen preference for MySpace or 1 Feedback welcome! [email protected] CITATION: boyd, danah. (2011). “White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook.” In Race After the Internet (eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021
    Published: Wednesday 7 July 2021 Questions tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Wednesday 7 July Questions for Written Answer 1 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Welsh Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27308) 2 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Scottish Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27309) 3 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Northern Ireland Executive on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27310) 4 Navendu Mishra (Stockport): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if she will consult with groups representing blind and partially- sighted people on the potential merits of reforming the safety information wording contained in household appliance instructions, previously governed by EU law, to make that information more inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • London Manchester Number of Employees by Parliamentary
    Constituency MP Employees Constituency MP Employees Aberconwy Guto Bebb 4 KDC Contractors Ltd 8 Matom Limited 4 Kier Construction Limited 50 Dounreay Aberdeen North Kirsty Blackman 3 Matom Limited 9 Thurso, Caithness MMI Engineering Ltd 2 Mott MacDonald Ltd 2 dounreay.com SNC-Lavalin/Atkins 1 URENCO 450 Bury North Salford Aberdeen South Ross Thomson 4 URENCO Nuclear Stewardship & Eccles 80 PBO: Cavendish Dounreay Partnership Ltd Manchester AECOM 2 Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill Hugh Gaffney 27 (Cavendish Nuclear, CH2M, AECOM) Worsley & Nuvia 2 Scottish Enterprise 1 Lifetime: 1955–1994 Eccles South Airdrie and Shotts Neil Gray 68 SNC-Lavalin/Atkins 26 Operation: Development of prototype Balfour Beatty 22 Copeland Trudy Harrison 13,045 fast breeder reactors BRC Reinforcement Ltd 41 AECOM 11 People: More than 1,000 Bolton West Morgan Sindall Infrastructure 5 ARUP 46 Aldershot Leo Docherty 69 Assystem UK Ltd 27 Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross Wigan Fluor Corporation 12 Balfour Beatty 151 Mirion Technologies (IST) Limited 56 Bechtel 17 NuScale Power 1 Bureau Veritas UK Ltd 71 Aldridge-Brownhills Wendy Norton 19 Capita Group 432 Stainless Metalcraft (Chatteris) Ltd 19 Capula Ltd 10 Maker eld Altrincham and Sale West Sir Graham Brady 108 Cavendish Nuclear Ltd 214 Manchester Mott MacDonald Ltd Costain The UK Civil Nuclear Industry Central 108 14 Alyn and Deeside Rt Hon Mark Tami 31 Direct Rail Services 18 James Fisher Nuclear Ltd 31 Doosan Babcock Limited 57 Argyll and Bute Brendan O’Hara 13 Gleeds 30 Denton Mott MacDonald Ltd 13 GRAHAM
    [Show full text]
  • AMENDMENTS Given up to and Including Monday 14 January 2019
    1 House of Commons NOTICES OF AMENDMENTS given up to and including Monday 14 January 2019 New Amendments handed in are marked thus Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance Amendments tabled since the last publication: 49 CONSIDERATION OF BILL (REPORT STAGE) AGRICULTURE BILL, AS AMENDED NOTE This document includes all amendments tabled to date and includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been arranged in the order in which they relate to the Bill. Kerry McCarthy Martin Whitfield Darren Jones Caroline Lucas Mary Creagh Alex Sobel Stella Creasy Stephen Timms Ian Murray Tonia Antoniazzi Matt Western Ruth Cadbury Dr Rupa Huq Mr David Lammy Catherine West Angela Smith Daniel Zeichner Stephen Doughty Kate Green Debbie Abrahams Owen Smith Mrs Madeleine Moon John Grogan Stephen Twigg James Frith Dr Sarah Wollaston Mr George Howarth Mike Gapes NC1 To move the following Clause— 2 Consideration of Bill (Report Stage): 14 January 2019 Agriculture Bill, continued “Ratification of international trade agreements (1) An international trade agreement shall not be ratified unless it enables the United Kingdom to require imports to— (a) comply with the standards laid down by primary and subordinate legislation in the United Kingdom regarding food safety, the environment and animal welfare, or (b) have been produced to standards that are no lower than the legislative standards of the United Kingdom in protecting food safety, the environment and animal welfare. (2) In this section “international trade agreement” has the same meaning as in section 2(2) of the Trade Act 2018.” Member’s explanatory statement This new clause would prevent the Government from entering into trade agreements that allow food imports that do not meet the UK’s environmental, animal welfare and food safety standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Displays of Connection
    Public displays of connection J Donath and d boyd Participants in social network sites create self-descriptive profiles that include their links to other members, creating a visible network of connections — the ostensible purpose of these sites is to use this network to make friends, dates, and business connections. In this paper we explore the social implications of the public display of one’s social network. Why do people display their social connections in everyday life, and why do they do so in these networking sites? What do people learn about another’s identity through the signal of network display? How does this display facilitate connections, and how does it change the costs and benefits of making and brokering such connections compared to traditional means? The paper includes several design recommendations for future networking sites. 1. Introduction Since then, use of the Internet has greatly expanded and today ‘Orkut [1] is an on-line community that connects people it is much more likely that one’s friends and the people one through a network of trusted friends’ would like to befriend are present in cyberspace. People are accustomed to thinking of the on-line world as a social space. Today, networking sites are suddenly extremely popular. ‘Find the people you need through the people you trust’ — LinkedIn [2]. Social networks — our connections with other people — have many important functions. They are sources of emotional and ‘Access people you want to reach through people you financial support, and of information about jobs, other people, know and trust. Spoke Network helps you cultivate a and the world at large.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating and Optimizing Your Digital Identity Amanda Izenstark University of Rhode Island, [email protected]
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Public Services Department Faculty Publications Public Services 2014 Look Good When You're Googled: Creating and Optimizing Your Digital Identity Amanda Izenstark University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lib_ps_pubs The University of Rhode Island Faculty have made this article openly available. Please let us know how Open Access to this research benefits oy u. This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the final, published article. Terms of Use This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable towards Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth in our Terms of Use. Citation/Publisher Attribution Izenstark, A. (2014). Look good when you're Googled: Creating and optimizing your digital identity. Library Hi Tech News, 31(9), 14-16. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-07-2014-0061 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Public Services at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Services Department Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Look Good When You're Googled: Creating and Optimizing Your Digital Identity Amanda Izenstark University Libraries, University of Rhode Island [email protected] Amanda Izenstark ([email protected]) is Reference & Instructional Design Librarian at the University Libraries, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA. Abstract Purpose: This paper describes techniques librarians can use to enhance their online presence so that students, patrons, researchers, and prospective employers can locate them easily.
    [Show full text]
  • Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project
    The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning | November 2008 Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project Mizuko Ito, Heather Horst Matteo Bittanti, danah boyd, Becky Herr-Stephenson, Patricia G. Lange, C.J. Pascoe, and Laura Robinson with Sonja Baumer, Rachel Cody, Dilan Mahendran, Katynka Martínez, Dan Perkel, Christo Sims, and Lisa Tripp www.macfound.org Living and Learning with New Media | The MacArthur Foundation 1 Building the emerging field of digital media and learning The MacArthur Foundation launched its five-year, $50 million digital media and learning initiative in 2006 to help determine how digital media are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life. Answers are critical to developing educational and other social institutions that can meet the needs of this and future generations. The initiative is both marshaling what it is already known about the field and seeding innovation for continued growth. For more information, visit www.digitallearning.macfound.org. To engage in conver- sations about these projects and the field of digital learning, visit the Spotlight blog at spotlight.macfound.org. About the MacArthur Foundation The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. In addition to selecting the MacArthur Fellows, the Foundation works to defend human rights, advance global conservation and security, make cities bet- ter places, and understand how technology is affecting children and society. For more information or to sign up for MacArthur’s monthly electronic newsletter, visit www.macfound.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayoral Commission on Domestic Abuse REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL Bristol One City – Mayoral Commission on Domestic Abuse Contents
    Mayoral Commission on Domestic Abuse REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL Bristol One City – Mayoral Commission on Domestic Abuse Contents Introduction from Marvin Rees, Mayor of Bristol . 4 Preface by Cllr Asher Craig and Cllr Helen Godwin – Commission Co-Chairs . 5 Our Principles: an overview . 6 Domestic abuse and sexual violence – The facts . 8 Our Principles “We will start with you, and what’s right for you” . 9 “If you have children, we will work with you to support you” . 10 “ It is your home . if you want the person who is hurting, scaring, or controlling you to be told to leave and not return, we will take action” . .11 “ If staying in your home isn’t right for you, or you need a safe home to go to, we will do everything we can to make that happen ”. 12 “ There are a range of support services available . There will always be a person available to talk to you and help.” . 14 “In every corner of our city, we will work to eliminate sexual violence and abuse” . 15 “Domestic abuse and sexual violence are everybody’s business” . 16 Prevention . 16 Building Awareness . 16 Businesses and Employers . 17 Night-time Economy . 17 Legal Representation . 18 Changing Behaviour . 19 Appendix Our Principles . 20 Recommendations from the Mayoral Commission on Domestic abuse . 20 2 Bristol One City – Report and Recommendations With thanks The Commission co-chairs would like to extend their thanks to those who contributed to the workshop sessions which informed and influenced this report. Organisations represented in the commission workshops
    [Show full text]
  • NEW SHADOW CABINET 2020 Who’S In, Who’S Out?
    NEW SHADOW CABINET 2020 Who’s In, Who’s Out? BRIEFING PAPER blackcountrychamber.co.uk Who’s in and Who’s out? Sir Keir Starmer, newly elected Leader of the UK Labour Party, set about building his first Shadow Cabinet, following his election win in the Labour Party leadership contest. In our parliamentary system, a cabinet reshuffle or shuffle is an informal term for an event that occurs when the head of a government or party rotates or changes the composition of ministers in their cabinet. The Shadow Cabinet is a function of the Westminster system consisting of a senior group of opposition spokespeople. It is the Shadow Cabinet’s responsibility to scrutinise the policies and actions of the government, as well as to offer alternative policies. Position Former Post Holder Result of New Post Holder Reshuffle Leader of the Opposition The Rt Hon Jeremy Resigned The Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer and Leader of the Labour Corbyn MP KCB QC MP Party Deputy Leader and Chair of Tom Watson Resigned Angela Raynor MP the Labour Party Shadow Chancellor of the The Rt Hon John Resigned Anneliese Dodds MP Exchequer McDonnell MP Shadow Foreign Secretary The Rt Hon Emily Moved to Lisa Nandy MP Thornberry MP International Trade Shadow Home Secretary The Rt Hon Diane Resigned Nick Thomas-Symonds MP Abbott MP Shadow Chancellor of the Rachel Reeves MP Duchy of Lancaster Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon MP Left position The Rt Hon David Lammy MP Shadow Defence Secretary Nia Griffith MP Moved to Wales The Rt Hon John Healey MP Office Shadow Business, Energy Rebecca
    [Show full text]