Discovery Kit Teacher Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
National Aboriginal Awareness Week Booklet
National Aboriginal Awareness Week 2016 May 19–22 Aboriginal Awareness This week of celebration is an opportunity for all Canadians, especially young people and educators, who have the opportunity to create a Shared Teachings/Learnings environment to learn more about Aboriginal cultural heritages of Canada. By sharing our knowledge and experience, there will be greater understanding and harmony among all Canadians. In recognition of the many aboriginal cultures and experiential difference that exist among the BC and Canadian aboriginals, the Shared Teachings/Learnings suggested in this booklet are intended to highlight Aboriginal peoples, events, places, issues and realities that are statement of knowledge about Aboriginal peoples’ cultures, values, beliefs, traditions, history and languages. Source(s) Shared Learning: Integrating BC Aboriginal Content K–10 Did you know? Did you know that some of BC’s towns or cities have names that come from aboriginal sources. Find out what the following names mean and from which language the words come from. Match the names with the description. Chilliwack The name comes from an Okanagan word meaning “the always place”, in the sense of a permanent dwelling place. Coquitlam Is the name of the local tribe, ch.ihl-KWAY-uhk. This word is generally interpreted to mean “going back up”. Kamloops Is likely from the Salish tribal name which is translated as “small red salmon”. The name refers to the sockeye salmon common to the area. Suggestion: Make up your own matching work list or create a word search, etc. Place names reveal Aboriginal peoples’ contributions: Place names are never just meaningless sounds. -
Self-Guiding Geology Tour of Stanley Park
Page 1 of 30 Self-guiding geology tour of Stanley Park Points of geological interest along the sea-wall between Ferguson Point & Prospect Point, Stanley Park, a distance of approximately 2km. (Terms in bold are defined in the glossary) David L. Cook P.Eng; FGAC. Introduction:- Geomorphologically Stanley Park is a type of hill called a cuesta (Figure 1), one of many in the Fraser Valley which would have formed islands when the sea level was higher e.g. 7000 years ago. The surfaces of the cuestas in the Fraser valley slope up to the north 10° to 15° but approximately 40 Mya (which is the convention for “million years ago” not to be confused with Ma which is the convention for “million years”) were part of a flat, eroded peneplain now raised on its north side because of uplift of the Coast Range due to plate tectonics (Eisbacher 1977) (Figure 2). Cuestas form because they have some feature which resists erosion such as a bastion of resistant rock (e.g. volcanic rock in the case of Stanley Park, Sentinel Hill, Little Mountain at Queen Elizabeth Park, Silverdale Hill and Grant Hill or a bed of conglomerate such as Burnaby Mountain). Figure 1: Stanley Park showing its cuesta form with Burnaby Mountain, also a cuesta, in the background. Page 2 of 30 Figure 2: About 40 million years ago the Coast Mountains began to rise from a flat plain (peneplain). The peneplain is now elevated, although somewhat eroded, to about 900 metres above sea level. The average annual rate of uplift over the 40 million years has therefore been approximately 0.02 mm. -
Deadman's Island S\
VS RWj z i CORRESPONDENCE AND PAPERS IN REFERENCE TO STANLEY PAEK DEADMAN'S ISLAND S\ BRITISH COLUMBIA PRINTED BY ORDER OF PARLIAMENT OTTAWA PRINTED BY S. E. DAWSON, PRINTER TO THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1899 i RETURN [68a.] To an ADDRESS of the HOUSE of COMMONS, dated 1st May, for copies of all Orders in Council respecting Stanley Park and Deadman's Island, Vancouver, B.C., and all correspondence between the different Departments of the Canadian Government and the Imperial military and naval authorities respecting the park, or island, or both. Also for copies of all correspon dence respecting the same with the Government of British Columbia, the city of Vancouver, and the park authorities. Also for all correspondence between the member for Burrard, the Hon. Minister of Militia and Defence and the Department of Militia, the Hon. Minister of the Interior and other members of the Government, respecting the same. Also for all correspondence between Mr. Ludgate and his represen n tative and any Department of Government respecting Deadman's Island. Also a copy of all applications and correspondence respecting a lease or grant of Deadman's Island. Also a copy of all departmental reports, memoranda or letters on file in the Departments of Justice, Interior, Militia and Defence, respecting the park, Deadman's Island, or the title and disposal of the same ; also a copy of all grants or leases of the park or Deadman's Island. Also all reports or information obtained by the different departments before any lease or grant of Deadman's Island was enacted. -
Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver
Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver J EAN BARMAN1 anada has become increasingly urban. More and more people choose to live in cities and towns. Under a fifth did so in 1871, according to the first census to be held after Canada C 1867 1901 was formed in . The proportion surpassed a third by , was over half by 1951, and reached 80 percent by 2001.2 Urbanization has not benefited Canadians in equal measure. The most adversely affected have been indigenous peoples. Two reasons intersect: first, the reserves confining those deemed to be status Indians are scattered across the country, meaning lives are increasingly isolated from a fairly concentrated urban mainstream; and second, the handful of reserves in more densely populated areas early on became coveted by newcomers, who sought to wrest them away by licit or illicit means. The pressure became so great that in 1911 the federal government passed legislation making it possible to do so. This article focuses on the second of these two reasons. The city we know as Vancouver is a relatively late creation, originating in 1886 as the western terminus of the transcontinental rail line. Until then, Burrard Inlet, on whose south shore Vancouver sits, was home to a handful of newcomers alongside Squamish and Musqueam peoples who used the area’s resources for sustenance. A hundred and twenty years later, apart from the hidden-away Musqueam Reserve, that indigenous presence has disappeared. 1 This article originated as a paper presented to the Canadian Historical Association, May 2007. I am grateful to all those who commented on it and to Robert A.J. -
Forging the Crown Jewel: the Creation of Stanley Park JANINE
RZEPLINSKI Forging the Crown Jewel: The Creation of Stanley Park JANINE CARMEL RZEPLINSKI Stanley Park is a well-loved park just past the downtown core of Vancouver. Like all parks, Stanley Park had to be created by many people across generations. Stanley Park opened in 1888 after years of planning. During this planning stage, the government retroactively established provenance for the park and began unsettling its many residents. Over the decades, authorities relocated residents in the peninsula; removed skeletons from burial grounds; turned the park into a tinder-box through sloppy roadwork; and removed numerous flora and fauna to fit Stanley Park within a specific image of the Pacific Northwestern locale. Most recently, authorities placed freestanding poles from other nations in the park to manufacture an Indigenous presence that fit within a specific visage. Employing the research of local historians Sean Kheraj and Jean Barman among other academics, this paper will recount and analyse the development of Stanley Park. Particular attention is dedicated to the ways in which municipal and federal governments removed and remade Indigeneity in the park. It is clear through this research that the constructed nature of Stanley Park undermines the overall image presented to locals and tourists. Stanley Park, dubbed the city’s “Crown jewel,” has existed almost as long as the city of Vancouver and has become essential to the city’s identity. The park’s land spans one thousand acres on a peninsula near a harbour in the Burrard Inlet. Excluding the obviously developed areas, the peninsula is popularly seen and portrayed as a “virginal wilderness” within a metropolitan core to which residents and tourists can escape. -
Stanley Park Ecological Action Plan
Date: January 10, 2011 TO: Board Members – Vancouver Park Board FROM: General Manager – Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Stanley Park Ecological Action Plan RECOMMENDATION A. That the Board approve the recommended actions identified in this report and summarized in Appendix E to improve the ecological integrity of Stanley Park in the following five priority areas of concern: Beaver Lake’s rapid infilling; Lost Lagoon’s water quality; invasive plant species; fragmentation of habitat; and Species of Significance. B. That the Board approve a consultancy to develop a vision and implementation strategy for Beaver Lake in 2011 to ensure the lake’s long-term viability, to be funded from the 2011 Capital Budget. POLICY The Park Board’s Strategic Plan 2005 – 2010 includes five strategic directions, one of which is Greening the Park Board. The plan states that that the “preservation and enhancement of the natural environment is a core responsibility of the Park Board" and that the Board “will develop sustainable policies and practices that achieve environmental objectives while meeting the needs of the community”. It includes actions relevant to the ecological integrity of Stanley Park, such as: advocate for a healthy urban environment, integrate sustainability concepts into the design, construction and maintenance of parks, preserve existing native habitat and vegetation and promote and improve natural environments. The Stanley Park Forest Management Plan, approved on June 15, 2009, includes relevant Goals and Management Emphasis Areas. It identifies Wildlife Emphasis Areas, areas of the forest as having high importance to the ecological integrity of the park, and recommends facilitating projects that protect or enhance wildlife and their habitats. -
Report for the 2020 Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival from April 17 to 26, 2020, in Stanley Park by Nina Shoroplova, April
Report for the 2020 Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival from April 17 to 26, 2020, in Stanley Park by Nina Shoroplova, April 26, 2020 The beautiful cherry blossom season of 2020 is winding down, to be followed by the later parade of magnolias, camellias, rhododendrons, and azaleas. The ‘Takasago’ north of Rose Garden Lane continues to blossom in the last week of the festival. The ‘Takasago’ north of Rose Garden Lane continues to be outstanding, whereas I went past two ‘Rancho’ trees growing south of the Stanley Park Pavilion, and realized I had missed their blooming entirely. I have enjoyed photographing, smelling, and learning about four more Prunus cultivars over the last ten days: ‘Kanzan’, ‘Gyoiko’, ‘Shiro-fugen’, and ‘Shujaku’. In addition, I came across many charming, single trees of Prunus avium—at the Pooh Corner entrance to Stanley Park, along the Azalea Walk around the Ted and Mary Greig Rhododendron Garden, around Lost Lagoon, and north of the Vancouver Aquarium. A beautiful Prunus avium, even growing where it is, snug against the north fence of the Vancouver Aquarium This image of Prunus avium blossoms shows the curled-back sepals that VCBF Scout Co-ordinator, Wendy Cutler, explains identifies this species. The cultivar known as ‘Kanzan’ is a familiar sight to Vancouverites. There are two robust specimens growing on the corner of Park Lane and the extension of Comox Street, their double blossoms growing in clusters. Two ‘Kanzan’ grow on the corner of the extension of Comox Street where it meets Park Lane. On the way from the Azalea Walk in the Ted and Mary Greig Rhododendron Garden to the Works Yard at the northeast side of the Pitch & Putt grows a graceful ‘Gyoiko’, admired for its very unusually coloured double blossoms, the petals being ivory with green flecks and stripes and the sepals being pale green. -
Best for Kids in Vancouver"
"Best for Kids in Vancouver" Created By: Cityseeker 58 Locations Bookmarked Kaboodles Toy Store "Lots of Toys" A visit to Kaboodles Toy Store might just take you back a few decades to the time when you were a child yourself. The store has a good collection of toys used years ago, as well as new-age toys. Special discounts are available to teachers. Visit the website to check out new arrivals. by PhotoDu.de / CreativeDom ainPhotography.com +1 604 558 1117 www.kaboodlestoystore.c cambie@kaboodlestoystor 3404 Cambie Street, om/locations/cambie-st- e.com Vancouver BC vancouver-toy-store/ Oh Baby! "For Cute Little People" This friendly local store sells local clothing and accessories for babies and children. This store is great for kids and parents who prefer to make a statement: clothes and accessories here are a little on the outrageous and colorful side of the spectrum. You can find squeaky, padded duck shoes for babies, animal-spotted tights and sleepers for toddlers, and bright and by michaelvito cheery T-shirts and pants for older children. Other fun things like special toys and one-of-a-kind accessories are available too. Both local designers and major international brands are sold. Call for more details. +1 604 873 5808 3475 Cambie Street, Vancouver BC Toys"R"Us "Toys are Them!" With several branches across Canada and the USA, Toys"R"Us provides you with a huge selection of toys for all ages. Since the store is so big, you might need some help if you are looking around for something particular. -
Subject: Stanley Park Causeway
TO: Board Members - Parks and Recreation FROM: General Manager - Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: STANLEY PARK CAUSEWAY RECOMMENDATIONS A. THAT the Board approve the attached Stanley Park Causeway Term Sheet, also to be approved by the British Columbia Transportation Financing Authority (BCTFA), the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC), TransLink and the City of Vancouver, including: 1. Commitment to a long-term objective to remove private automobile traffic from the Stanley Park Causeway by 2030, in conjunction with developing a new crossing of Burrard Inlet. 2. Comprehensive safety upgrade to the Stanley Park Causeway and park entrance as follows: a. Widening the three Causeway vehicle lanes from 2.95 metres to 3.5 metres, and re-aligning the s-curve at Lost Lagoon. b. Rebuilding the Park Drive overpass at Prospect Point. c. Rebuilding the Pipeline Road underpass at Lost Lagoon. d. Rebuilding the pedestrian Chilco Street underpass. e. Developing Stanley Park loop as the new all-season terminus for Stanley Park buses. f. Turning Chilco bus loop and Chilco Street between Georgia and Alberni Streets into park space. B. THAT no additional or altered legal rights shall arise from this approval in terms of the Provincial tenure of the Causeway as outlined in the agreement of July 12, 1999, between the Province and the Park Board. C. THAT the Board authorize the General Manager to amend the July 12, 1999 Causeway Agreement to reflect the changes described in Recommendations A.(2) and B. of this report. POLICY On April 11, 1994, the Board passed a motion advising the Provincial Government of the Board's opposition to any Lions Gate crossing option that would require or result in either the expansion of the right-of-way through Stanley Park or any compromise on Lost Lagoon, and of the Board's preference for any crossing option that would result in the elimination of vehicular traffic through Stanley Park. -
YOF CITY CLERK's DEPARTMENT VANCOUVER Access to Information
~YOF CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT VANCOUVER Access to Information File No.: 04-1000-20-2017-469 December 20, 2017 Re: Request for Access to Records under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the "Act") I am responding to your request of November 21 , 2017 for: 1. A copy of the most current version of the City of Vancouver's Integrated Pest Management policy and any available information regarding the said policy, beyond what is provided on City of Vancouver's website (http://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/integrated-pest management.aspx); and 2. Any available reports that present findings on the efficacy of the City of Vancouver's Integrated Pest Management policy (i.e. statistics on the decrease in pesticide use over time; statistics on pests that have been eradicated; statistics on public perception of pest management, etc.). All responsive records are attached. The department has advised that they do not have any current reports that provide the tracking or efficacy information requested. · Under section 52 of the Act you may ask the Information & Privacy Commissioner to review any matter related to the City's response to your request, within 30 business days from the date of this letter. You can request a review by writing to: Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner, Email: [email protected], Tel: 250·387-5629 and providing: 1) the request number (#04-1000-20-2017-469); 2) a copy of this letter; 3) a copy of your original request; and 4) the reason you're requesting a review. Please do not hesitate to contact the Freedom of Information Office at [email protected] if you have any questions. -
Vancouver Tourism Vancouver’S 2016 Media Kit
Assignment: Vancouver Tourism Vancouver’s 2016 Media Kit TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 4 WHERE IN THE WORLD IS VANCOUVER? ........................................................ 4 VANCOUVER’S TIMELINE.................................................................................... 4 POLITICALLY SPEAKING .................................................................................... 8 GREEN VANCOUVER ........................................................................................... 9 HONOURING VANCOUVER ............................................................................... 11 VANCOUVER: WHO’S COMING? ...................................................................... 12 GETTING HERE ................................................................................................... 13 GETTING AROUND ............................................................................................. 16 STAY VANCOUVER ............................................................................................ 21 ACCESSIBLE VANCOUVER .............................................................................. 21 DIVERSE VANCOUVER ...................................................................................... 22 WHERE TO GO ............................................................................................................... 28 VANCOUVER NEIGHBOURHOOD STORIES ................................................... -
Vancouver Park Board Has Established the Original Planting Scheme, Including a Number of Tree Species Referenced in Shakespeare’S Plays
THE NATIONAL PARKS AND LES PARCS NATIONAUX ET LES NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES OF CANADA LIEUX HISTORIQUES NATIONAUX DU CANADA Stanley Park national historic site of canada Commemorative Integrity Statement Commemorative Integrity Statement Approved: Christina Cameron, Director General, National Historic Sites Parks Canada Jim Barlow, Field Unit Superintendent Coastal B.C. Field Unit Parks Canada Ms. Susan Mundick, General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation NOVEMBER, 2002 Table of Contents Preface How to Use this Commemorative Integrity Statement Acknowledgements 1.0 Introduction 1.1 National Historic Sites Objectives.....................................1 1.2 Definition and Purpose of Commemorative Integrity......................1 1.3 Historical and Geographical Contexts..................................2 2.0 Commemorative Intent 2.1 Commemorative Context............................................5 2.2 Definition of Commemorative Intent...................................6 2.3 Statement of Commemorative Intent...................................6 3.0 Treatment of the Three Elements of Commemorative Integrity 3.1 First Element The resources that symbolize or represent the site’s national historic significance are not impaired or under threat 3.1.1 Designated Place ............................................7 Physical Values ...........................................8 Symbolic Values .........................................11 Objectives ...............................................11 3.1.2 Natural Elements of the Commemorative