Legacy the Nature Conservancy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legacy the Nature Conservancy OCTOBER 1989 y Maine Legacy The Nature Conservancy Rachel Carson Refuge expanded Conservancy buys $2.7 million property Mark McCallum he Maine Chapter of The Nature funds would soon be appropriated to station, store, office park, inn and Conservancy has purchased 315 meet the $2.7 million price. conference center. After the Conser­ Tacres of waterfront property in Saco as By August 9, the date the Conser­ vancy placed the land under option, a proposed addition to the Rachel vancy’s option was due to expire, fed­ zoning changes and a new sewer line at Carson National Wildlife Refuge. eral funding was still in doubt. Never­ the land’s border made the property The parcel, known as Ocean Wood theless, the Maine Chapter’s Board of even more valuable for development. Estates, is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Trustees voted to exercise the option Nevertheless, the 14 co-owners coop­ Service’s top acquisition priority for rather than risk losing the property to erated to help protect the parcel. the Rachel Carson Refuge. Earlier this development. 'T’ve lived here all my life, and I was year, at the request of the Service, the The acreage is part of a 475-acre greatly concerned to try to preserve Conservancy negotiated an option to parcel which, as recently as 1986, had open space,” said Mark McCallum, purchase the property. In doing so, we been planned as a community of almost took the calculated risk that federal 900 dwelling units plus a school, fir 'MAINE STATE LIBRARY1 ge two NOV 17 1989 Rachel Carson Refuge expanded from page one President of Ocean Wood Associates and one of the owners. Among the current residents who will continue to enjoy the pines, hard­ woods and 44 acres of marsh that cover the property are scores of animal species and thousands of migratory shore birds. Blanding’s turtle (Emydoi- dea blandingii), listed as endangered in Maine, inhabits the freshwater marsh area. The tract, located along Goosefare Brook, is the largest undeveloped parcel currently available for addition to the Rachel Carson National Wildlife Ref­ uge. The refuge consists of nine divi­ sions spaced at intervals along 45 miles of the southern Maine coastline from Kittery to Cape Elizabeth. Ocean Wood Estates Late news As this issue went to press, "Oceanography in the Gulf of Maine,” the House and Senate Interior Rachel Carson Memorial Pesticide Use over the Past Century,” Appropriations Conference Conference and "Women in Science.” Committee had just approved The Maine Chapter of The Nature Rachel Carson’s books, including $2.4 million for land acquisition Conservancy joined the Boothbay Silent Spring, helped awaken the public at the Rachel Carson National Region Land Trust in the Rachel Carson to the importance of ecology. She was a Wildlife Refuge. The appropri­ Memorial Conference on September founder and honorary chairman of the ation will cover most, but not 20 and 21, 1989 at the Newagen Maine chapter of The Nature Conser­ all, of the Conservancy’s costs Seaside Inn in Southport. The confer­ vancy. Through her estate she provided in buying Ocean Woods Estates. ence, coordinated by Jennifer Logan of a generous bequest to the chapter for In addition to purchase and Boothbay Harbor, marked a quarter­ the purpose of providing stewardship transaction expenses, the Con­ century since the naturalist’s death. to its coastal and island preserves. In servancy will incur interest on Barbara St. John Vickery, the chap­ her honor, all Conservancy preserves funds borrowed to complete the ter’s Director of Science and Steward­ in Maine bordering salt water (including purchase and to hold the prop­ ship, was one of four speakers on a 45 islands) are referred to collectively erty until the U.S. Fish and panel, "The Conservation Movement as the Rachel Carson Seacoast Preserve Wildlife Service can acquire the in Maine.” Other panels discussed System. balance. Depending on interest rates and the timing of federal purchases, it is anticipated that the Conservancy will still have to recover well in excess of $200,000. It is expected that the Conser­ vancy will sell most of the Ocean Wood Estates acreage to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser­ vice this winter, retaining the balance in hopes that additional federal funding will be appro­ priated next year. Rachel Carson Salt Pond Preserve 2—Maine Legacy, October 1989 the director's corner by J. Mason Morfit ext month, you will receive the much more effectively and efficiently which you, the members, didn’t have NMaine Chapter’s Annual Appeal. than if each chapter had to provide to pay a dime. Last month, you received an annualthose services for itself. In addition, No, it wasn’t done with smoke and appeal from the Conservancy’s national the national annual appeal supports mirrors! Six of the properties involved, office. What’s going on here? four regional offices which provide worth over $1 million, were gifts from It has been a longstanding Conser­ the expertise of senior staff specialists generous landowners. Five others, vancy policy to decentralize our fund in science, land acquisition, steward­ worth approximately $5 million, were raising to the greatest degree possible. ship and other fields to individual state purchases on behalf of state and federal Each unit of the organization is respon­ chapters, including ours. conservation agencies for which we sible for raising most of its own operat­ While we couldn’t do our job with­ will ultimately be reimbursed... we ing budget, and funds are raised sep­ out the help of the national and regional hope! arately for land acquisition projects or offices, they couldn’t do the Conser­ other programs. Membership dues are vancy’s work in Maine without a strong While you, the members, weren’t split equally between local chapters state chapter. And, as the Maine Chap­ asked to contribute directly to the pur­ and the national organization. ter’s Annual Appeal accounts for al­ chase of those properties, they didn’t Internally, this policy means that we most 25 per cent of our operating protect themselves. In virtually every run a tight ship; as most of the people budget, it’s clearly essential to our case, the Maine Chapter incurred sig­ who spend money also have to raise it, ability to get the job done. nificant costs for biological assessment, costs are watched closely. All contributions to the Maine Chap­ negotiations (frequently prolonged and Externally, this policy provides do­ ter Annual Appeal are used directly difficult), surveys, title work, legal nors with the opportunity to determine and entirely in Maine. And, while fees, etc. The return on investment is which specific aspects of the Conser­ some people prefer to give directly to terrific, but making these projects hap­ vancy’s complex overall mission they land acquisition projects, gifts to our pen still requires a lot of cash. wish to support financially. It also operations budget represent a 'best The ancient Greek mathematician, means you get a lot of mail. buy’ opportunity. inventor (and closet conservationist) We encourage Maine Chapter mem­ Consider this: if we manage to nego­ Archimedes, once said, "Give me a bers to support the national organiza­ tiate the purchase of a piece of property lever long enough...and single-handed tion’s annual appeal. Many functions for half its appraised value, donors to I can move the world.” We can provide essential to the good management of that project get leverage of 1 to 1, or the leverage, but we need your hands- any organization (e.g., finance, account­ double their money. Not bad! But on help to move a little more of the ing, auditing, data processing, person­ during the 1988-89 fiscal year, the earth into protected status. Please re­ nel, legal, training, etc.) are performed Maine Chapter protected approximate­ spond as generously as you can to the for the chapters by the national office, ly $6 million worth of property for Maine Chapter Annual Appeal. Wilbur Neck on Cobscook Bay in Pem­ broke. In cooperation with the Maine De­ partment of Inland Fisheries and Wild­ life, the Conservancy has completed the purchase of a 230-acre tract here that includes a bald eagle nesting site as well as prime water fowl and upland habitat. (See "Two Cobscook Bay parcels tar­ Jim geted” in the June, 1989, issue of Maine Dow Legacy.) October 1989, Maine Legacy—3 Stewardship Never a dull moment a car was abandoned on an old woods Please be patient road at another preserve. The Maine Chapter Stewardship pro­ • Peat-mining machinery was moved For all of you who have generously gram now tracks over 400 volunteers into place on a peatland abutting a offered to volunteer your time to the on a computerized database. These Conservancy preserve; Chapter since the beginning of the year people donate their services in a variety But, fortunately, sometimes the news (at last count we had received approx­ of ways essential to the smooth function­ is good: imately 25 new volunteer forms), please ing of the stewardship program; they • A new rare plant species was found don’t give up on us. We have finally act as preserve and easement monitors, on a property protected by the Conser­ developed a computerized system to serve on local preserve stewardship vancy—within inches of off-road track all of our volunteers, which committees, lead field trips, monitor vehicle tracks; should help us make the best use of rare plant populations, and join in • A bald eagle re-established a nest on you who are willing and able to lend a preserve workdays. Chapter staff are an island preserve known to be a hand.
Recommended publications
  • Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-1975 Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game, "Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975" (1975). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 301. https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/301 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game 284 State Street, Augusta, Maine 04330 0££K) auie^M 'e+snSny '+994S 9+p+S VQZ FISHING LICENSES Commissioner of Indian Affairs stating that the person described is an awe0 pue sauaijsij pupguj jo juauupiedaQ auip^Aj Indian and a member of that tribe. For this purpose, an Indian shall RESIDENT NONRESIDENT be any member on tribal lists of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy 16 years and older . $ 6.50 Season: age 16 and older $15.50 Tribes, or a person on the membership list of the Association of Combination ............. 10.50 12-15 years inclusive .. 2.50 Aroostook Indians and who has resided in Maine for at least 5 years. ‘ 3-day . ’ 6.50 15-day* “ ........................ 10.50 “ Leave or furlough . 2.50 7-day ................................. 7.50 3-day ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maine State Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) REVISED STATUTES 1964 prepared Undet. l~e Supervijion oll~e Commitlee on Revijion 01 Stalulej Being the Tenth Revision of the Revised Statutes of the State of Maine, 1964 Volume 6 Titles 33 to 39 Boston, Mass. Orford, N. H. Bost0n Law Book Co. Equity Publishing Corporation st. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co. Text of Revised Statutes Copyright © 1904 by State of Maine 6 Maine Rev.Stats. This is a historical version of the Maine Revised Statutes that may not reflect the current state of the law. For the most current version, go to: http://legislature.maine.gov/legis/statutes/ Ch.3 WATERS-PROTECTION-IMPROVEMENT CHAPTER 3 PROTECTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF WATERS Subch. Sec. I. Water Improvement Commission __________________________ 361 II. Interstate Water Pollution Control ________________________ 491 III. Criminal Liability ___________ - ____ -- __ _ ___ -__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 571 SUBCHAPTER I WATER IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION ARTICLE 1. ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 361. Organization; compensation; meetings; duties. 362. Authority to accept federal funds. 363. Standards of classification of fresh waters. 364. -Tidal or marine waters. 365. Classification procedure. 366. Cooperation with other departments and agencies. 367. Classification of surface waters. 368. -Inland waters. 369. -Coastal streams. 370. -Tidal waters. 371. -Great ponds. 372. Exceptions. ARTICLE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Research TAC Set Aside Scallop Exemption Program for 2008
    NOAA Grant Number: NA14NMF4540071 Grantee: Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME DMR) Project Title: An Assessment of Sea Scallop Distribution and Abundance in Federal and Adjacent State Waters of the Gulf of Maine Project Code: 14-SCA-11 Amount of Grant: 53,192 lbs. of scallops for 2014 ($558,515) and 35,461 lbs. of scallops for 2015 ($372,344) Start Date: 03/01/2014 Period Covered by Report: 03/01/2014 - 06/30/2018 Executive Summary The sea scallop fishery in the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) occurs in federal waters and is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC). The fishery is managed by total allowable catch (TAC) independently of the rest of the EEZ sea scallop stock. A cooperative survey was carried out by the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) and the University of Maine (UMaine) in May-June 2016. Survey results indicate that the biomass (by meat weight) of NGOM sea scallops targeted by the fishery (102+ mm or 4+ in. shell height (SH)) was approximately 728 MT in 2016. Landings from the NGOM were significantly higher in 2016 than any previous year and were largely from southern Jeffreys Ledge and northern Stellwagen Bank. Maine state waters were surveyed in 2015-16. A strong year-class observed in Cobscook Bay in 2015 recruited to the fishery in 2016. Other rotational areas surveyed with notable densities of harvestable scallops were Machias Bay, Gouldsboro Bay/Dyers Bay and West Vinalhaven (2015) and Cutler coast, Chandler Bay and Lower Blue Hill Bay (2016). Purpose The major objective of the project was to develop a survey program to assess scallop distribution and abundance in federal waters of the NGOM Scallop Management Area (as defined in Amendment 11 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan) and to estimate a biologically sustainable TAC for the stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Research TAC Set Aside Scallop Exemption Program for 2008
    NOAA Grant Number: NA11NMF4540019 (DMR#4312) Grantee: Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME DMR) Project Title: An Assessment of Sea Scallop Distribution and Abundance in Federal and Adjacent State Waters of the Gulf of Maine Project Code: 11-SCA-04 Amount of Grant: 77,135 lbs. of scallops from any open area or open access area Start Date: 03/01/2011 Period Covered by Report: 03/01/2011 – 3/31/2015 Executive Summary The sea scallop fishery in the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) occurs in federal waters and is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council. The NGOM resource and associated fishery are at times locally important but amount to a small portion of the total stock and landings. The fishery is managed by total allowable catch (TAC) independently of the rest of the EEZ sea scallop stock. The NGOM fishery does not use biological reference points as targets or thresholds. A cooperative survey was carried out by the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) and the University of Maine in May-June 2012. Survey results indicate that the biomass (by meat weight) of NGOM sea scallops targeted by the fishery (102+ mm or 4+ in shell height) was approximately 164 MT (90% confidence interval of 74-279 MT) in 2012. Landings during 2009-12 amounted to approximately 7 MT. Based on these biomass estimates the exploitation rate in weight (landings/stock biomass, assuming harvested scallops greater than 102 mm shell height and a survey dredge efficiency of 43.6%) during 2012 was 2.1% with a 90% confidence interval from 1.3% to 4.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission
    MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT OCTOBER 2002 Prepared By: MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT OCTOBER 2002 Prepared By: MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ......................................................................... 4 2.1 Dennys River.......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Fishery Management and Habitat Use.................................................................... 6 2.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Surrounding Land Use .......................................................................................... 13 3.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 General Approach................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Scoping ................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Study Area................................................................................................ 15 3.2.2 Study Reaches..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Neotectonic Activity in Coastal Maine by Seismic Reflection Methods
    Maine Geological Survey Neotectonics of Maine 1989 An Investigation of Neotectonic Activity in Coastal Maine by Seismic Reflection Methods Joseph T. Kelley Maine Geological Survey State House Station 22 Augusta, Maine 04333 Daniel F. Belknap R. Craig Shipp Sarah B. Miller* Department ofG eological Sciences University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 *present address: Weston Consultants Weston Way West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380 ABSTRACT Seven embayments along the Maine coast (Saco Bay, Casco Bay, Sheepscot Bay, Eggemoggin Reach, Machias Bay, Cobscook Bay, and Oak Bay) were surveyed for evidence of late Quaternary faulting by seismic reflection methods. The bays are representative of all coastal compartments in Maine, and all are located near regions of Paleozoic or older faults. In more than 1000 km of seismic reflection profiles one possible recent fault was resolved along with numerous slump and gas deposits. While one might argue that faulting triggered the slumps that were observed, no consistent association of slumps and faults was recognized. Slumps appear confined to the margins of deep channels where tidal current action, possibly in conjunction with natural gas evolution, triggers their occurrence. Instead of finding continuous slumping along a basin, as might be the case if faulting initiated the slumping, the slump deposits were widely scattered and even occurred in basins with no inferred bedrock faults. The possible recent fault was observed in Oak Bay, along the Canadian border. In this area of frequent seismic energy release tidal range is also extreme. The feature indicated as a possible fault may, thus, be a manifestation of current reworking of Quaternary sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Dennysville, Maine Comprehensive Plan Dennysville (Me.)
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 6-2003 Town of Dennysville, Maine Comprehensive Plan Dennysville (Me.). Comprehensive Plan Committee Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs Repository Citation Dennysville (Me.). Comprehensive Plan Committee, "Town of Dennysville, Maine Comprehensive Plan" (2003). Maine Town Documents. 425. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs/425 This Plan is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Town Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOWN OF DENNYSVILLE, MAINE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN June 2003 With revisions based on State Planning Office review for consistency with the Planning and Land Use Regulation Act The town of DENNYSVILLE 2003 comprehensive plan Prepared by the Dennysville Comprehensive Plan Committee: Dean Bradshaw Rick Jamieson Carolyn Mahar Mary McFadden James Sullivan Consultant: Washington County Council of Governments TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # A. Executive Summary A-1 Map 1: Location of Dennysville in Washington County end of section A B. Historical and Archaeological Resources B-1 Policies and Implementation B-8 Map 2: Dennysville Streets, Public Facilities and Place Names end of section B C. Population C-1 Policies and Implementation C-5 D. Natural Resources D-1 Policies and Implementation D-12 Map 3: Topography and Flood Zones end of section D Map 4: STATSGO Soils and Gravel Pits Map 5: Aquifers, Watersheds and Wetlands Map 6: Land Cover Map 7: Critical Resources Map 8: Marine Resources E.
    [Show full text]
  • In the New England District
    HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF FEDERAL NAVIGATION STUDIES AUTHORIZATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS & FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE IN THE NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT MAINE MAINE LIST OF DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS ON RIVERS AND HARBORS IN THE NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER, Brunswick A-1 aka; Brunswick Harbor AROOSTOCK RIVER, Fort Fairfield to Masardis A-2 ATKINS BAY, Phippsburg A-3 BACK COVE, Portland See Also; Portland Harbor B-1 BAGADUCE RIVER, Penobscot B-7 BANGOR HARBOR, Bangor & Brewer B-10 See: Penobscot River BAR HARBOR, Bar Harbor B-15 BASIN COVE, South Harpswell (See Also POTTS HARBOR) B-22 BASS HARBOR, Tremont B-23 BASS HARBOR BAR, Tremont B-25 BEALS HARBOR, Beals (Barneys Cove) B-26 BELFAST HARBOR, Belfast B-27 BIDDEFORD POOL, Biddeford (See WOOD ISLAND HARBOR) -- BIRCH HARBOR, Gouldsboro (No File) -- BLUE HILL HARBOR, Blue Hill B-32 BOOTHBAY HARBOR, Boothbay Harbor B-33 BRUNSWICK CANAL, Brunswick & Harpswell B-36 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, Brunswick (See ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER) -- BUCK HARBOR, South Brooksville (No File) -- BUCKS HARBOR, Machiasport B-37 BUCKSPORT HARBOR, Bucksport & Verona B-39 -i- MAINE LIST OF DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS ON RIVERS AND HARBORS IN THE NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT (Continued) BUNGANUC CREEK (Maquoit Bay), Harpswell & Brunswick B-42 BUNKER HARBOR, Gouldsboro B-43 CALF ISLAND HARBOR, Roque Bluffs (Johnsons Cove) C-1 CAMDEN HARBOR, Camden C-2 CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK, Deer Isle, New Brunswick, Canada Mulholland Point Lighthouse - Shore Protection along Lubec Channel C-7 CAPE NEDDICK HARBOR, York C-8 CAPE NEWAGON HARBOR, Southport
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Agency Rule-Making Adoption
    NOTICE OF AGENCY RULE-MAKING ADOPTION AGENCY: Department of Marine Resources CHAPTER NUMBER AND TITLE: Chapter 11.22 Targeted Closures (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) Cobscook Bay, Whiting & Dennys Bays, St. Croix River, Inner Little Kennebec/Englishman Rotational Area, Addison Rotational Area, Casco Passage, Bagaduce River; Sheepscot River; Casco Bay. Emergency Regulations CONCISE SUMMARY: The Commissioner adopts this emergency rulemaking for the implementation of conservation closures located in Cobscook Bay, Whiting & Dennys Bays, Inner Little Kennebec/Englishman Bay Rotational Area, Addison Rotational Area, Casco Passage, Bagaduce River, Sheepscot River and Casco Bay in order to protect Maine’s scallop resource due to the risk of unusual damage and imminent depletion. In addition, harvesting in the St. Croix River will be limited to one day per week for draggers, and one day per week for divers. Scallop populations throughout the state are at extremely low levels. The Department is concerned that unrestricted harvesting during the remainder of the 2014-15 fishing season in these areas may deplete a severely diminished resource beyond its ability to recover. Continued harvesting may damage sublegal scallops that could be caught during subsequent fishing seasons, as well as reducing the broodstock essential to a recovery. These immediate conservation closures are necessary to reduce the risk of unusual damage and imminent depletion. For these reasons, the Commissioner hereby adopts an emergency closure of Maine’s scallop fishery in Cobscook Bay, Whiting & Dennys Bays, Inner Little Kennebec/Englishman Bay Rotational Area, Addison Rotational Area, Casco Passage, Bagaduce River, Sheepscot River and Casco Bay and restricts harvest in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Grant Number: NA08NMF4540664 (DMR#3312
    NOAA Grant Number: NA08NMF4540664 (DMR#3312) Grantee: Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME DMR) Project Title: An Assessment of Sea Scallop Distribution and Abundance in Federal Waters of the Gulf of Maine Project Code: 08-SCA-03 Amount of Grant: Elephant Trunk Access Area: 70,000 lbs. and Days-At-Sea in Open Access Areas: 20 DAS (Research TAC Set Aside Scallop Exemption Program for 2008 Fishing Year) Award Start Date: 7/1/2008 Period Covered by Report: 7/1/2008 – 6/30/2011 Executive Summary The sea scallop fishery in the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) occurs in federal waters and is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council. The NGOM resource and associated fishery are at times locally important but amount to a small portion of the total stock and landings. The fishery is managed by TAC independently of the rest of the EEZ sea scallop stock. The NGOM fishery does not use biological reference points as targets or thresholds. A cooperative survey was carried out by the Maine Department of Marine Resources and the University of Maine in June and July, 2009. Survey results indicate that the biomass of NGOM sea scallops targeted by the fishery (102+ mm or 4+ in shell height) was approximately 80-140 mt of meats during 2009. Landings during 2009 amounted to approximately 7 mt. The exploitation rate (reported landings in weight / estimated biomass) in the NGOM during 2009 was estimated at approximately 0.05 to 0.08. These estimates are based on density estimates from the survey assuming a range of 30-50% in dredge capture efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • First District
    State Representative District 1 In Aroostook County, the municipalities and unorganized territories of Allagash, Ashland, Eagle Lake, Fort Kent, Garfield Plantation, Nashville Plantation, Northwest Aroostook Twp. (includes T11-R14), St. Francis, St. John Plantation, Wallagrass and Winterville Plantation. State Representative District 2 In Aroostook County, the municipalities and unorganized territories of Frenchville, Madawaska, New Canada, Perham, Portage Lake, Square Lake (includes T17-R2, T17-R3, T17-R4 a/k/a Sinclair, T17-R5, T15-R6, T16-R4 a/k/a Madawaska Lake), Saint Agatha, Stockholm and Westmanland. State Representative District 3 In Aroostook County, the municipalities of Caswell, Connor Twp., Cyr Plantation, Grand Isle, Hamlin, Limestone, New Sweden, Van Buren and Woodland. State Representative District 4 In Aroostook County, the municipality of Caribou. State Representative District 5 In Aroostook County, that portion of the municipality of Presque Isle bounded by a line described as follows: Beginning at the point where Presque Isle, Caribou and Washburn boundaries intersect; then east along the Presque Isle-Caribou boundary to the point where the Presque Isle, Caribou and Fort Fairfield boundaries intersect; then south along the Presque Isle-Fort Fairfield boundary to the Presque Isle-Easton boundary; then south along the Presque Isle-Easton boundary to the Presque Isle-Westfield boundary; then west along the Presque Isle-Westfield boundary to the Houlton Road; then northwest along the Houlton Road to Center Line Road; then
    [Show full text]
  • Eelgrass Metadata on Northeast Ocean
    Eelgrass Beds Northeast United States November 29, 2017 Prepared for: Northeast Regional Ocean Council (NROC) www.northeastoceandata.org Updated by: Emily Shumchenia Northeast Ocean Data Portal Working Group from original July 1, 2014 version by: Kate Longley SeaPlan 1. INTRODUCTION Eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds are critical wetlands components of shallow coastal ecosystems throughout the region. Eelgrass beds provide food and cover for a great variety of commercially and recreationally important fauna and their prey. Eelgrass and other seagrasses are often referred to as "Submerged Aquatic Vegetation" or SAV. This distinguishes them from algae, which are not classified as "plants" by biologists (rather they are often placed in the kingdom protista), and distinguishes them from the "emergent" saltwater plants found in salt marshes. In addition to the term SAV, some coastal managers use the term SRV or submerged rooted vegetation. EelgrassBeds was created from five separate datasets for the states of Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine. Where possible, polygon datasets depicting the most recent eelgrass surveys were used. Attributes with common themes for each dataset were integrated in order to better represent eelgrass density and year sampled. The data user is encouraged to read this and the metadata of each individual state’s data carefully, as geometry, attribute details, and timeliness are not necessarily consistent among datasets used to develop this layer. Details of each state’s data source are described in the data processing section. 2. PURPOSE The purpose of mapping the distribution of eelgrass (Submerged Aquatic Vegetation - SAV) is to determine areas where eelgrass is present throughout coastal New England waters in order to support coastal and ocean planning.
    [Show full text]