DOCSLIB.ORG

The Current State of Monetary Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Current State of Monetary Policy HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Economic Affairs 1st Report of Session 2006–07 The Current State of Monetary Policy Report with Evidence Ordered to be printed 12 December and published 18 December 2006 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 14 The Economic Affairs Committee The Economic Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session with the orders of reference “to consider economic affairs”. Current Membership The members of the Economic Affairs Committee are: Lord Kingsdown Lord Lamont of Lerwick Lord Lawson of Blaby Lord Layard Lord Macdonald of Tradeston Lord MacLaurin of Knebworth Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay Lord Paul Lord Sheldon Lord Skidelsky Lord Turner of Ecchinswell Lord Vallance of Tummel Lord Wakeham (Chairman) Information about the Committee The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationary Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee are available on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/lords_economic_affairs.cfm Members’ interests are available at the Register of Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/about_lords/register_of_lords__interests.cfm General Information General information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/about_lords/about_lords.cfm Contact Details All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Economic Affairs Committee. Committee Office, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW The telephone number for general inquiries is 020 7219 4568 The Committee’s email address is [email protected] CONTENTS Paragraph Page Introduction 1 5 The current state of inflation 4 5 Inflation and the labour market 6 6 Inflation and money growth 11 7 Figure 1: UK Inflation and Money Growth 1985–2006 7 Inflation and asset prices 14 8 Monetary and fiscal policy 20 9 External appointments to the MPC 27 10 Conclusions 31 11 Appendix 1: Economic Affairs Committee 12 Appendix 2: List of Witnesses 13 Appendix 3: Call for Evidence 14 Oral Evidence Mr Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England Ms Rachel Lomax, Deputy Governor of the Bank of England Sir John Gieve, Deputy Governor of the Bank of England Ms Kate Barker, External Member of the Monetary Policy Committee Professor David Blanchflower, External Member of the Monetary Policy Committee Oral evidence, 31 October 2006 1 Written Evidence Professor Ray Barrell and Ms Rebecca Riley 12 Professor Jagjit Chadha 15 Professor Tim Congdon 16 Professor Charles Goodhart 28 Mr E J A Haygarth 29 NOTE: References in the text of the report are as follows: (Q) refers to a question in oral evidence (p) refers to a page of written evidence The Current State of Monetary Policy Introduction 1. This is the fourth report of the Select Committee for Economic Affairs on the work of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England. The previous reports were published in 2003, 2004 and 20051, and before this the Select Committee on the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England, the predecessor to this Committee, published reports on monetary policy in 1999 and 2001.2 2. This report covers the main features of monetary policy for the twelve month period since November 2005. It is based mainly on evidence given to the Committee by Mervyn King, Governor of The Bank of England, and four other members of the MPC in October 20063, on the Inflation Reports for 2006, and on the Minutes of the MPC. The Committee invited written evidence on the current state of monetary policy. The report also takes account of this. 3. Over the last twelve months the Bank’s repo rate was raised by 25 basis points on two occasions, in August and November 2006. At the end of the year it stands at 5%. The August increase was the first change in the official interest rate since August 2005, when it was cut by 25 basis points to 4.5%. On neither occasion was the MPC unanimous in its decisions. In November two members of the MPC (David Blanchflower and Rachel Lomax) voted against the increase, preferring to keep rates constant. In August only Professor Blanchflower voted against the rate increase. In November the majority took the view the prospects for demand were strong due to rising money growth, equity and house prices, and to falling long-term interest rates. Those who voted against an increase thought that falling energy prices and slack in the labour market would allow the economy to continue to grow without threatening inflation. The current state of inflation 4. The estimated rate of Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation for October 2006 is 2.4%. This compares with 2.3% twelve months ago, in October 2005. In between, inflation fell to 1.8% in March 2006 and has climbed slowly since then. Although this level of inflation is high compared with recent inflationary experience, it is well within its permitted range of 1–3%. The central projection for inflation in the November Inflation Report is that it will continue to rise until the end of the year before reverting rapidly to 2%. 1 Select Committee on Economic Affairs, 2nd Report (2002–03): The MPC and Recent Developments in Monetary Policy (HL 66); Select Committee on Economic Affairs, 3rd Report (2003–04): Monetary and Fiscal Policy: Present Successes and Future Problems (HL 176-I); 4th Report: The Current State of Monetary Policy. 2 Select Committee on the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England (1998–99, HL 96-I); Select Committee on the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England (2000–01, HL 34-I). 3 Kate Barker, David Blanchflower, Sir John Gieve and Rachel Lomax. 6 THE CURRENT STATE OF MONETARY POLICY 5. Given the uncertainties twelve months ago associated with the potential effects on inflation of higher oil prices, which increased by nearly 25% in the year ending July 2005, the inflation outcome may be regarded with some satisfaction. Two major contributory factors in this success have been the fall in the prices of oil and gas in recent months. The price of oil fell by 23% between August and November 2006 while, since the beginning of the year, the price of gas fell by roughly 60%. Inflation and the labour market 6. The main concerns for inflation noted in the Inflation Reports published in 2006 were the possible effects on wage claims of the higher rate of inflation— especially Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation, on which most wage claims are based—and the degree of slack in labour markets, the effect of university tuition fees and the double digit rate of growth in the money supply. 7. In his evidence to the Committee, the Governor said that his greatest concern was the balance between demand and supply, particularly the uncertainties on the supply side. His single biggest uncertainty was the size of the labour force. He said: “We just do not know how big the population of the United Kingdom is and, because the composition of the population and its split between different groups of workers, young versus old, migrant workers versus normally resident workers, have changed in recent years, it may well be that some of the statistics we are using are not giving a very accurate reading”. One example he gave was the measure of unemployment on the claimant count which he said: “…may be an accurate measure of the unemployment statistics for those claiming unemployment benefits, but ignores the large chunk of migrant workers who have not yet qualified for unemployment benefit.” As a result he thought that this measure of unemployment may be an understatement. He contrasted this measure with the Labour Force Survey measure of unemployment which he thought: “…may be overstating unemployment because the statistics, although purporting to be drawn for the economy as a whole are drawn from sample surveys which are then aggregated up to a national total using estimates of the population which may well be out of date and inaccurate.” (Q 2) 8. Commenting on the implications for the MPC of inaccuracies in the unemployment statistics, Mr King explained that the MPC uses the rate of unemployment as a quantitative indicator of the pressure of demand on capacity in the labour market. If the measure of unemployment is biased due to not having a good estimate of the total population then this would affect their judgement about the pressure of demand on capacity. He said that this was the basis of the MPC’s uncertainty about “why a very tight labour market was not in fact pushing up wages.” (Q 9) 9. In a further comment, Mr King said that it was not entirely clear to the MPC whether wages had fully taken on board the adverse shocks to the terms of trade resulting from the increase in oil prices. He said “the question was whether firms will need to raise prices relative to costs in order to get back to a position in which it remains profitable to produce output.” (Q 2) 10. Clearly, unmeasured migration makes it difficult to estimate the amount of spare capacity in the economy. But this may be less true for the balance of the labour market, where statistics can give fairly consistent month-to-month measures of the changing balance of supply and demand in the (mainly non- THE CURRENT STATE OF MONETARY POLICY 7 migrant) labour force. Nonetheless, we accept that these are valid matters of concern for the MPC, not least because differences of opinion about the tightness of the labour market have been identified in the Minutes as one of the main reasons why members of the MPC have voted differently on interest rates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rachel Lomax: Inflation Targeting in Practice - Models, Forecasts and Hunches
    Rachel Lomax: Inflation targeting in practice - models, forecasts and hunches Speech by Ms Rachel Lomax, Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, to the 59th International Atlantic Economic Conference, London, 12 March 2005. I am most grateful to Jens Larsen, James Bell, Fabrizio Zampolli and Robin Windle for research support; and to Charlie Bean, Peter Andrews, Spencer Dale, Phil Evans, Laura Piscitelli and other colleagues at the Bank of England for helpful comments. * * * Introduction Five and a half years ago in his Monnet lecture Charles Goodhart1 was able to talk with some confidence of the features that particularly distinguished the UK’s approach to inflation targeting. Today with over 20 countries, in every habitable continent, formally operating some variant of inflation targeting and many more adopting some parts of the framework, all actively sharing experience and best practice, I suspect that most aspects of our approach would find a counterpart somewhere else in the world. But Charles’s focus on the Monetary Policy Committee’s (MPC) personal engagement in producing a published inflation forecast still seems to me to capture the essence of the UK’s approach. Today I want to talk about the role that forecasting has come to play in helping the MPC to take and communicate its decisions. In what sense does the Committee really ‘own’ the published forecasts that go out under its name? How much use do we make of models, and what models do we use? How far do our forecasts appear to drive interest rate decisions? And is there any evidence that this has helped to make policy more or less predictable? Finally I want to end by commenting on some of the issues raised by forecasts as a means of communication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Run on the Rock
    House of Commons Treasury Committee The run on the Rock Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 January 2008 HC 56–II [Incorporating HC 999 i–iv, Session 2006-07] Published on 1 February 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £25.50 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Mr Siôn Simon MP, (Labour, Birmingham, Erdington) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport). Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Surrey Discussion Papers in Economics By
    råáp=== = = ======råáîÉêëáíó=çÑ=pìêêÉó Discussion Papers in Economics THE DISSENT VOTING BEHAVIOUR OF BANK OF ENGLAND MPC MEMBERS By Christopher Spencer (University of Surrey) DP 03/06 Department of Economics University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 7XH, UK Telephone +44 (0)1483 689380 Facsimile +44 (0)1483 689548 Web www.econ.surrey.ac.uk ISSN: 1749-5075 The Dissent Voting Behaviour of Bank of England MPC Members∗ Christopher Spencer† Department of Economics, University of Surrey Abstract I examine the propensity of Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee (BoEMPC) members to cast dissenting votes. In particular, I compare the type and frequency of dissenting votes cast by so- called insiders (members of the committee chosen from within the ranks of bank staff)andoutsiders (committee members chosen from outside the ranks of bank staff). Significant differences in the dissent voting behaviour associated with these groups is evidenced. Outsiders are significantly more likely to dissent than insiders; however, whereas outsiders tend to dissent on the side of monetary ease, insiders do so on the side of monetary tightness. I also seek to rationalise why such differences might arise, and in particular, why BoEMPC members might be incentivised to dissent. Amongst other factors, the impact of career backgrounds on dissent voting is examined. Estimates from logit analysis suggest that the effect of career backgrounds is negligible. Keywords: Monetary Policy Committee, insiders, outsiders, dissent voting, career backgrounds, ap- pointment procedures. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Relationship to the Literature 2 3 Rationalising Dissent Amongst Insiders and Outsiders - Some Priors 3 3.1CareerIncentives........................................... 4 3.2CareerBackgrounds........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America During the Financial Crisis
    Political Science and Political Economy Working Paper Department of Government London School of Economics No. 3/2014 Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America during the Financial Crisis Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey (LSE) Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America During the Financial Crisis Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey Government Department London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE [email protected] http://personal.lse.ac.uk/schonhar/ This study examines deliberation on monetary policy oversight in the US and UK between 2006 and 2009. It employs reciprocity as the key criterion for judging the quality of monetary policy oversight deliberation (i.e., committee participants are expected to engage with one another, taking up and responding to the reasons offered by other participants). Using automated content analysis, the empirical finding is that reciprocity is clearly evident in the parliamentary oversight committee, but much less so in the two congressional committees. The two country cases represent very different approaches to legislative oversight, with the UK demonstrating a committee approach both in terms of the testimony of the monetary policy body and of the behaviour of the legislative committee, while the US demonstrates a focus on a series of individual contributions both from the Fed chairman and Members of Congress. In the US, this appears to allow greater scope to divert discussion away from the primary focus of hearings (i.e., monetary policy). 1 I. Introduction In normal economic times, clashes between politicians and central bankers in legislative oversight hearings on monetary policy are not typically considered worthy of headline news coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of the Bank of England a New Bank for a New Governor
    Reform of the Bank of England A new Bank for a new Governor James Barty Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Daniel Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), Richard Ehrman (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, David Meller, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Andrew Sells, Patience Wheatcroft, Rachel Whetstone and Simon Wolfson. Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of the people who have given us their views on the Bank, its historic performance and what could be done to reform it. We would particularly like to thank Dan Conaghan whose book The Bank (Inside the Bank of England) is an excellent read and a great source of information. This project was also enhanced by the panel debate we had with Sir John Gieve and Andrea Leadsome MP on the future of the Bank, which prompted a number of extra lines of enquiry for us. Finally we would like to thank those who have contributed to the Financial Policy unit at Policy Exchange without whose financial assistance this report could not have been produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Livespreads8.01 Email Lite5
    6/6/2008 5:39 The Morning Email: Central Banks Table of Contents Pg 1 The FOMC: Dates and Places Pg 2 The FOMC: People Pg 3 Top CB Expectations, Dates, and more Pg 4 The FOMC: Ranges NEW info added Pg 5 PBOC Pg 6 BOJ Pg 7 The ECB : People, Objectives Pg 8 The ECB: Banks Pg 9 The ECB: Statement Pg 10 The BOE - Dates, Rates, and Statement Pg 11 The BOE - How They Voted Pg 12 The EU: Who Pg 13 The EU: Map of Banks Pg 14 The EU: Intrinsics Pg 15 Notes on Speeches Recent Updates Page Date (dd/mm/yyy) 3 6/4/2005 If you see orange on any page, then, it was updated in the 2 5/25/2008 last day or two or it's a new item to the email. Want something added? Let me know: [email protected] Disclaimer: All information within this newsletter is meant for internal use at GH Trader's LLC, only. All information has been recorded to the best of my ability. This material is based upon information that I consider reliable, but I do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Jim Goulding, [email protected] The Morning Email: Central Banks 6/6/2008 5:39 The FOMC: Dates and Places Pg 1 Meeting Dates for 2008 JanuaryFebruary March April May June 29/30 18 29/30 24/25 July August September October November December 5 16 28/29 16 The term "monetary policy" refers to the actions undertaken by a central bank, such as the Federal Reserve, to influence the availability and cost of money and credit to help promote national economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Work of the Committee in 2005–06
    House of Commons Treasury Committee Work of the Committee in 2005–06 Third Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 16 January 2007 HC 191 Published on 26 January 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks), (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Mr David Gauke MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) Kerry McCarthy MP (Labour, Bristol East) Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Mr Brooks Newmark MP (Conservative, Braintree) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following members were also members of the Committee during Session 2005–06: Lorely Burt MP (Liberal Democrat, Solihull) Damian Green MP (Conservative, Ashford) Susan Kramer MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) David Ruffley MP (Conservative, Bury St Edmunds) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairmans Report.Pdf
    Dean House Vernham Dean Andover, Hants SP11 0JZ Tel: +44 (0)1264737552 Fax: +44 (0)20 7900 2585 Email: [email protected] www.spe.org.uk ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN 2017‐18 2017‐18 has been a transformative year for the Society. In January, at the start of the Society’s 65th year, we changed our name from Society of Business Economists (SBE) to Society of Professional Economists (SPE). There were two primary reasons why we made this change: 1. To broaden our appeal to a wider and more diverse range of economists. I am pleased to report that the Society’s membership has risen by more than 10% in the 10 months since we made the change and that it continues to grow rapidly. 2. To mark the Society’s expansion into the area of professional development. At the start of this year we launched a new professional development programme for economists, which is being run by the Society’s Head of Professional Development, Andy Ross. Through the hard work of Andy and his team, the popularity of these courses has grown steadily through the year. Meanwhile, the programme of events that the Society is holding has never been stronger. Since the start of the 2017‐2018 financial year, the Society has hosted three central bank governors, three deputy governors, the Chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility, the Chief Economic Advisor to HM Treasury and a host of economics professors and other experts. We have heard speakers discussing topics ranging from Brexit to Intergenerational Fairness and from the UK’s long‐run economic performance to the outlook for the housing market.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2009 Q1
    52 Quarterly Bulletin 2009 Q1 Bank of England speeches A short summary of speeches made by Bank personnel since Seven lessons from the last three years publication of the previous Bulletin are listed below. Sir John Gieve, Deputy Governor, February 2009. www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/ What should be done about rising unemployment in the speech377.pdf United Kingdom? David Blanchflower, Monetary Policy Committee member, In his final speech as Deputy Governor, John Gieve looked back February 2009. at the period of Great Stability and described seven lessons www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/ from his time at the Bank of England. First, he believed speech379.pdf regulators should have a say in banks’ risk management, as the recent crisis has shown that banks relied too heavily on flawed In this speech, David Blanchflower explained that while systems. Second, he outlined the gaps that existed in the monetary and fiscal policy could stimulate the economy in the United Kingdom’s arrangements for resolving failing banks. short term, the medium-term prospects for growth relied on a He welcomed the new arrangements established by the healthy financial sector to channel savings into the most Banking Act which bridge those gaps. Third, he noted that productive investments. One risk to the economic outlook international co-operation and co-ordination procedures for was that large increases in unemployment, coupled with resolving cross-border institutions were lacking and needed negative equity in the housing market, could lead to rising improvement. Fourth, he argued that the current generation arrears and defaults on mortgage loans.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of UK Economic Statistics March 2016 Independent Review of UK Economic Statistics Professor Sir Charles Bean
    Front cover Independent review of UK economic statistics Independent Review of UK Economic Statistics Professor Sir Charles Bean March 2016 March 2016 2904936 Cover and Dividers v1_0.indd 1 09/03/2016 13:43 Independent Review of UK Economic Statistics Professor Sir Charles Bean March 2016 ii Independent Review of UK Economic Statistics Contents Chapter 1: Introduction and overview 1 Background to the Review 1 A vision for the future provision of economic statistics 6 Recommendations: Measuring the economy 8 Recommendations: ONS capability and performance 10 Recommendations: Governance of statistics 13 Content outline 15 Chapter 2: Measuring the modern economy – established challenges 19 Measuring GDP 19 Measuring services 35 Measuring financial inter-connectedness 42 Regional statistics 47 Measuring the labour market 50 Physical capital 58 Land market statistics 62 Addressing established statistical limitations 68 Chapter 3: Measuring the modern economy – emerging challenges 71 Value added in the digital modern economy 71 The sharing economy 91 Intangible investment 98 Accounting for quality change 106 Understanding the international location of economic activity 112 Keeping abreast of an evolving economy 116 Chapter 4: Effectiveness of ONS 121 Recent history of ONS 121 ONS resources 124 Recent ONS performance 130 Culture, Capability and Collaboration 137 Survey data sources 156 Administrative data and alternative data sources 162 Contents iii Data science capability 167 Technology and data infrastructure 176 Dissemination of ONS statistics
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes
    House of Commons Treasury Committee Formal Minutes Session 2005–06 Treasury Committee: Formal Minutes 2005–06 1 Proceedings of the Committee Thursday 14 July 2005 Members present: Angela Eagle John McFall Damian Green Mr George Mudie Ms Sally Keeble Mr David Ruffley Susan Kramer Mr Mark Todd Mr Andrew Love Peter Viggers Kerry McCarthy Members disclosed their interests, pursuant to the resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 For details of declarations of interest see Appendix. 1. Election of Chairman John McFall was called to the Chair. Ordered, That the Chairman do report his election to the House. ** 2. The Committee’s programme of work The Committee considered this matter. 3. Sub-Committee Ordered, That a Sub-Committee be appointed, to examine the work of the minor departments accountable to the Treasury and other matters referred to it by the main Committee.—(The Chairman.) Ordered, That all members of the Committee be members of the Sub-Committee.—(The Chairman.) Ordered, That Mr Michael Fallon be Chairman of the Sub-Committee.—(The Chairman.) 4. Cash machine charges Draft Special Report (Cash machine charges: Government Response to the Committee’s Fifth Report of Session 2004–05), proposed by the Chairman, brought up, read the first and second time, and agreed to. Resolved, That the Report be the First Special Report of the Committee to the House. Ordered, That the Chairman make the Report to the House. Ordered, That the Government’s response to the Committee’s Fifth Report (Cash machine charges) be appended to the Report. 5. Excise Duty Fraud Draft Special Report (Excise Duty Fraud: Government Response to the Committee’s Fourth Report of Session 2004–05), proposed by the Chairman, brought up, read the first and second time, and agreed to.
    [Show full text]
  • MACROECONOMIC POLICY 'INFLATION TARGETRY' in PRACTICE Summary Reading
    EC307 EPUK - Macroeconomic Policy Jennifer Smith - University of Warwick ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE UK MACROECONOMIC POLICY ‘INFLATION TARGETRY’ IN PRACTICE Summary In 1992 the UK adopted an inflation target. This lecture discusses the development of inflation targeting since then. The monthly policymaking process is described, including how this has changed under the Labour government. In the next few lectures we will investigate various characterisations of inflation targeting, assess the performance of this regime, discuss the best specification for an inflation target and compare inflation targeting to other possible macro policy regimes. Reading Influential Bank views King, Mervyn (2005) “Monetary Policy: Practice Ahead of Theory” http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2005/speech245.pdf King, Mervyn (2002) “The Monetary Policy Committee Five Years On”, http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2002/speech172.pdf King, Mervyn (2000), “Monetary policy: theory in practice”, http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2000/speech67.htm King, Mervyn (1997) “The Inflation Target Five Years On” http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/1997/speech09.pdf Other useful Bank papers Walton, David (2005) “Monetary policy challenges facing a new MPC member” http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2005/speech254.pdf Bell, Marian (2005), “Communicating monetary policy in practice” http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2005/speech244.pdf Institutional (but also contain assessments & principles) Key dates since 1990: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/history.htm Monetary policy framework: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/framework.htm BoE Core Purposes: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/corepurposes/index.htm MPC: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/overview.htm Rodgers, Peter (1998), “The Bank of England Act”, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, (May) 93-9.
    [Show full text]