DOCSLIB.ORG

Rebuilding Bank Governance After the Financial Crisis: Best Practices Thomson Reuters CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rebuilding Bank Governance After the Financial Crisis: Best Practices Thomson Reuters CONTENTS REBUILDING BANK GOVERNANCE AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: BEST PRACTICES THOMSON REUTERS CONTENTS WHY BANKS ARE DIFFERENT . 3 ESTABLISHING A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING RISK . 4 FOCUSING ON THE RIGHT DATA REMAINS A CORE CHALLENGE . 5 FINDING THE RIGHT PEOPle – EXPERIENCE IS KEY, BUT NOT THE ONLY ANSWER . 5 A SPOTLIGHT ON EXECUTIVE PAY . 6 CONCLUSION . 7 2 REBUILDING BANK GOVERNANCE AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: BEST PRACTICES OCTOBER 2012 Demands on bank directors have rarely been There is also a wider array of risks bank higher . Following the financial crisis of 2008, managements and boards must assess in board members in the U .s . and Europe contrast to other industries . These include have confronted dozens of new rules from a credit; market; liquidity; operational; legal and multitude of regulators, while striving to regain reputational risks . At any time, one of these the confidence of customers and shareholders . risks has the potential to jeopardize the bank’s Amidst this newfound scrutiny, bank boards business—making it critical for board members are increasingly being held accountable, with to have timely access to information . regulators as well as private plaintiffs pursuing The regulatory scrutiny to which banks are claims when performance falters . In the first subject, as well as the rising risk of litigation, nine months of 2012, the FDIC authorized suits makes it particularly important for banks to against 274 defendants—although many of be able to point to an effective governance these will ultimately be settled . structure . For example, banks should give The scrutiny shows no sign of abating . Just in careful thought to what percentage of directors the last few months, there has been the Libor are ‘inside’ directors versus independent rate-setting scandal that led to the resignation directors; what the appropriate board of Barclays chief executive, and the unexpected committees are to establish and of course, who trading loss of more than $5 .8 billion at is best equipped to run those committees . In JPMorgan that was followed by the departure particular, the board may want to consider a of its chief investment officer . ‘skills audit’ to identify in greater detail what knowledge or experience each member can How should bank boards respond in these contribute to the board . times of heightened risk? This white paper will review governance guidelines mandated by Bank directors should keep in mind that regulators or recommended by academics regulators conduct examinations that and consultants . The hope is that banks will include an assessment of whether a board be less vulnerable to extraordinary losses is carrying out its duties . During the course by setting clear standards for assessing risk; of an examination, examiners review board paying careful attention to board structure and minutes . According to a guide for bank selection of directors; and taking a thoughtful directors published by the Federal Reserve approach to incentive compensation for top Bank of Kansas City (Basics for Bank Directors, executives . January 2010), the examiner will look to the minutes to confirm that the board has: WHY BANKS ARE DIFFERENT “approved business strategies for the bank; Banks require governance solutions that differ approved and reviewed policies that articulate from what other industries might adopt . This is risk tolerances and set exposure limits for its due to banks’ conflicting constituents: on the important activities; and periodically reviewed one hand, they must satisfy shareholders, but the bank’s performance in order to monitor its they are also beholden to the public, including risk exposures and the effectiveness of its risk depositors . Satisfying the first group may mean management . Bank directors must also be taking risks that jeopardize the second—which mindful of ‘’management information,” or what in turn could subject the bank to regulatory information is disclosed to regulators and the scrutiny . Being a bank board member involves a public on business and risk decisions . delicate search for a middle ground . ESTABLISHING A FRAMEWORK FOR separate risk committee composed of ASSESSING RISK independent directors, including at least one Given the growing complexity of global banks’ risk management expert with a background at operations, regulators have stressed that bank a large, complex business . The Federal Reserve is boards should be guided by a special currently drafting this rule; similar requirements committee focused on risk management, and for smaller bank holding companies may set specific standards for that committee’s follow . priorities . The failure of bank boards to In the u .k ., the Walker Review, an assessment adequately monitor risk has been repeatedly of corporate governance at u .k . banks, was referred to by regulators as a cause of the published in November 2009, strongly financial crisis . One oft-quoted fact about the recommending that banks set up a board-level collapse of Lehman Brothers is that the bank’s risk committee and appoint a Chief Risk Officer risk committee met only twice in 2006 and in to support the board committee . However, the 2007, the years leading up to the crisis . recommendations ultimately adopted in the In the past, many bank boards managed risk revised UK Corporate Governance Code through the audit committee . But that is (affecting all companies) the following year did changing, at the prodding of regulators who not mandate a separate risk committee . The believe risk oversight is critical enough to code does stress that “the board is responsible warrant its own committee . The role of the risk for determining the nature and extent of the committee is to take a strategic approach to significant risks it is willing to take in achieving analyzing and assessing risk . In contrast, the its strategic objectives .” audit committee is responsible for verifying The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, that the proper controls are in place, with which includes representatives of 27 nations, regard to risk management, compensation and published its revised ‘Principles for Enhancing other governance issues . This is key given Corporate Governance’ in October 2010 . The banks’ increased disclosure requirements . principles noted that “effective risk management u .s . banks, along with other companies, are requires robust internal communication within bound by enhanced Securities and Exchange the bank about risk, both across the organization Commission disclosure rules effective February and through reporting to the board and senior 2010, requiring companies to provide details management .” The Basel Committee also about the board’s role in assessing risk . Even recommended the appointment of a Chief Risk though the rule does not mandate a specific Officer with access to the board, and in many course of action, it indirectly promotes best cases, a risk committee . practices in risk management . The rules also Banks have already made progress in tightening require companies to disclose compensation risk controls: a recent survey by Ernst & Young policies that could affect the company’s risk (Progress in Financial Services Risk Management, profile . June 2012) of 69 global banks and 6 insurance The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and companies found that 87% already had Consumer Protection Act of 2010 will require established a board-level risk committee; publicly traded u .s . bank holding companies while 57% of participants said their boards had with assets of $10 billion or more to set up a increased focus on risk post-crisis . 4 REBUILDING BANK GOVERNANCE AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: BEST PRACTICES OCTOBER 2012 FOCUSING ON THE RIGHT DATA REMAINS and correlations, and include qualitative A CORE CHALLENGE firm-wide views of risk relative to return and But more needs to be done, with information to the bank’s external operating environment. gathering cited as the top challenge . While Senior management, and, as applicable, the 77% of participants in the Ernst & Young survey board, should review and approve scenarios have increased spending on technology since that are used in the bank’s risk analysis and the crisis, it will take years before those systems should be made aware of assumptions and are fully operational . potential shortcomings embedded in the “While the reporting process is improving in bank’s risk models.” many organizations, persistent problems still FINDING THE RIGHT PEOPle – cited run the gamut from poor data quality, to EXPERIENCE IS KEY, BUT NOT THE ONLY gaps in data flow from system to system, to the ANSWER sheer volume of data, which can result in Even if boards obtain the appropriate data, ‘phone book-sized’ reports that are not relevant interpreting it is another matter . As a result, or useful,’’ the study noted . identifying the best executives to serve on bank A key question is what data is important for the boards is a critical task . board to monitor . Boards are desperate to Many third parties such as rating agencies avoid getting overwhelmed by minutiae, at a maintain that bank boards should include time when rising complexity makes risk harder directors with financial backgrounds . Given the to monitor . Historically banks have focused on risks at stake, it is no longer acceptable for formulas such as Value At Risk to determine bank directors to plead ignorance of arcane whether the bank was operating in a prudent financial products such as collateralized bond manner . But critics say VAR failed to take into obligations . account extreme market conditions, such as those of 2008 . Banks have in fact been hiring more financial veterans . A report by Moody’s Investors Service A useful description of how boards should (Bank Boards in the Aftermath of the Financial approach risk management appeared in the Crisis, March 2010) noted that 46% of outside Basel Committee report: directors at global banks in North America and “Risk analysis should include both quantitative Europe had financial backgrounds, up from and qualitative elements. While risk measurement 32% before the crisis . is a key component of risk management, excessive Still, hiring banking industry veterans may not focus on measuring or modeling risks at the be a panacea .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assigning Responsibilities in the Libor Scandal
    1233 The Differential Management of Financial Illegalisms: Assigning Responsibilities in the Libor Scandal Thomas Angeletti How, in a context of growing critiques of financialization, can law contribute to protecting the legitimacy of finance? This paper argues that the assign- ment of responsibilities between individuals and organizations plays a deci- sive role, using the recent Libor scandal as an empirical illustration. To do so, the paper offers a Foucauldian framework, the differential management of financial illegalisms, dedicated to the study of illegalities in financial capi- talism. The comparison of the legal treatment of two manipulations of Libor, this key benchmark in financial markets, reveals how mid-level traders have been the object of criminal prosecution, while law undervalued the role of top managers and organizations. To capture how differential management is performed in practice, I analyze precisely how the conflict-resolution devices (criminal trial vs. settlement) and the social categorizations prevailing in the two manipulations of Libor favor different forms of responsibility, individual or organizational. I conclude by exploring the implications of law’s relation- ship to financial legitimacy. For more than a decade now, the financialization of capitalism (Krippner 2011; Van der Zwan 2014) has been the locus of many critiques. Financialization has been studied sufficiently to under- stand how much finance has invaded our daily lives (Martin 2002), without measuring necessarily fully its ramifications. The clear causality between the rise of wages in the financial sector and the rise in income inequality in the United Kingdom (Bell and Van Reenen 2013), the United States (Volscho and Kelly 2012), and France (Godechot 2012) has put the financial sector on the spot.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIBOR Scandal Primer What Does the Acronym
    A LIBOR Scandal Primer What does the acronym, “LIBOR,” stand for? The “London Inter-bank Offered Rate.” What does LIBOR represent? LIBOR is promoted as representing the average interest rate that large banks can borrow from one another. LIBOR is not the interest rate on any single loan. Rather it is an index intended to reflect average interbank interest rates as determined by a defined procedure. LIBOR is not a single interest rate, but is approximately 150 interest rates. • There is a separate set of interest rates for each major currency. LIBOR rates, representing the cost of acquiring funds for a time period, are unique for each currency because relative currency values differ over time. For example, the value in euros of one US dollar changes continuously. The difference in euro LIBOR rates and US dollar rates brings borrowings in the two currencies into equilibrium. • Within each set of LIBOR rates for a given currency, there are different rates for different durations (the term of a fixed period of interest rate). For instance, one day LIBOR represents a loan with an interest rate which is reset (or is repaid) every day. Three-month LIBOR represents a loan with an interest rate that is reset (or is repaid) every three months, and so on. Why is the cost of inter-bank borrowing important to banks? When banks lend money to individuals, companies or governments, the fundamental cost of lending the money is the cost of acquiring the funds to lend. On the margin, the cost of acquiring funds is the interest rate needed to procure funds from another bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The LIBOR Scandal What We Know, What We Don’T, and What to Expect 8/2/2012
    REPUBLICAN STAFF BRIEF The LIBOR Scandal What We Know, What We Don’t, and What to Expect 8/2/2012 Key Points LIBOR is important because it is referenced by nearly $800 trillion in global financial instruments, including corporate debt, mortgages, student loans, interest rate swaps, and other derivatives. Although Barclays is the only bank to have been singled out for manipulating LIBOR so far, more than a dozen other large domestic and foreign banks are being investigated by regulators. The net effect of Barclays’ manipulations of LIBOR is yet unclear—the bank’s counterparties likely benefitted in some instances and likely suffered harm in others, while individual consumers might have benefitted on the whole. Years of litigation will determine the full extent of the damages. Were Glass-Steagall still law, none of its provisions would have applied in this case. Rather than enact new laws or implement new regulations, the federal government should efficiently and effectively enforce the existing antitrust and securities laws that already made Barclays’ and its employees’ actions illegal. Combining proper enforcement of existing laws with smart reforms to internal and external LIBOR reporting processes will prevent further manipulation of this important benchmark interest rate. Introduction On June 27, 2012, representatives of the British bank Barclays agreed to On June 27, 2012, pay a $453 million fine to U.S. and U.K. regulators to settle allegations representatives of the that Barclays manipulated the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). British bank Barclays LIBOR is a set of indices that represent the prevailing interest rates in agreed to pay a $453 London money markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Glass–Restoring Glass Steagall
    June 2013 www.citizen.org Safety Glass Why It’s Time to Restore the 1930s Law Separating Banking and Gambling Acknowledgments This report was written by Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. Significant research assistance was provided by Jack Berghel and Nicholas Kitchel. Wallace Turbeville, senior fellow at Demos, provided invaluable advice. Congress Watch Research Director Taylor Lincoln edited the report. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 300,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2013 Public Citizen. Public Citizen Safety Glass ighty years ago, on June 16, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Banking Act, E also known as “Glass-Steagall,” in reference to Sen. Carter Glass (D-Va.) and Rep. Henry Steagall (D-Ala.). The law created deposit insurance, with the creation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. In exchange for guaranteeing the deposits of bank customers, Glass-Steagall steered FDIC banks into engaging in socially useful activity, notably making loans to businesses and consumers. In effect, Glass-Steagall forced the mega-banks of the day to sell off their investment divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential-Sample Chapters Full Text On
    CONFIDENTIAL-SAMPLE CHAPTERS FULL TEXT ON REQUEST Praise for $uperHubs “In $uperHubs, Ms. Navidi skillfully applies network science to the global finan- cial system and the human networks that underpin it. $uperHubs is a topical and relevant book that should be read by anyone seeking a fresh perspective on the human endeavor that is our financial system.” CONFIDENTIAL-SAMPLE—PROFESSOR LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS, CHAPTERS Harvard; former US Secretary of the Treasury, former Director of the US National Economic Council, former president of Harvard University, and author “Sandra Navidi’s book $uperHubs is beautifully and effectively done. Not only is it a fascinating description of the power wielded by elite networks over the financial sector, it is also a meditation on the consequences of this system for FULLthe economy TEXT and the society. ON In recentREQUEST times, we have seen extraordinary rup- tures—notably Britain’s vote to break away from the European Union and the intensified sense of exclusion felt by much of America’s working class. The last chapter of $uperHubs proposes that this ruling system›s “monoculture,” its iso- lation from the rest of society, and its seeming unawareness of the fragility of what it has built are largely responsible for these ruptures, and that the system may lead to a major crisis in the future.” —PROFESSOR EDMUND S. PHELPS, Columbia University, 2006 Nobel Prize in Economics; Director, Center on Capitalism and Society, and author “$uperHubs” is a book written with great style but also containing a lot of impor- tant substance. The style is so engaging, a real page turner, that I finished it in one non-stop session.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good Banker1
    The Good Banker1 Patrick Bolton Columbia University, ECGI, CEPR and NBER Second Draft: November 4, 2013 ABSTRACT What is a good banker? What is the economic value added of banks? The economics literature on financial intermediation focuses on the role of banks as deposit-taking institutions and as delegated monitors of borrowers. But this description barely begins to represent what banks do in a modern economy. Besides commercial lending, large banks are engaged in a number of other activities ranging from cash management, trade credit, swaps and derivatives trading and underwriting of securities. In recent decades banks have increasingly relied on fee income generated from their activities other than lending. The financial crisis, and the concerns about “too-big-to-fail” banks it has exposed, has led to a re-evaluation of bankers’ speculative practices and of the economic benefits of banks’ non-lending activities. Do trading activities undermine sound banking principles and core lending functions? Do they provide economic benefits, or are they simply an undesirable side-product of deregulation? The main argument of this article is that trading activities are an integral and desirable part of modern banking. These activities enhance banks’ traditional lending role, and regulatory attempts to separate lending and non- lending activities are mostly counterproductive. The main cause of bankers’ reckless behavior is rather to be found in out of hand compensation practices, which exacerbate bankers’ pursuit of short-run profit opportunities at the expense of financial stability and their clients’ interests. 1 I am grateful to Edward Glaeser, Jeffrey Gordon, Ailsa Röell, Charles Sabel, Tano Santos and Glen Weyl for helpful conversations and comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 (PDF)
    Impact 2014 Together we are working toward our vision of a community where every woman and girl has the opportunity to reach her full potential. Dear Supporter, The Women’s Fund of Omaha dedicated 2014 to building our capacity to improve the lives of women and girls through research, grants, and advocacy. Here are the highlights of what we accomplished in 2014 because of you: Identifying Issues The Women’s Fund of The cornerstone of our mission is to seek relevant, credible information Omaha is a trusted expert concerning the status of women and girls in our community. Through surveys in the community, we identify and in-depth research we are able to identify major issues that impact their critical issues, fund innovative lives. In 2014, we completed the following research: solutions and influence dynamic change. Since our beginning in 1990, the ► Adolescent Health Project (AHP) –This project seeks to create Women’s Fund has supported sustainable community-wide changes through a research-based, results local agencies with more focused, comprehensive approach that will: (1) increase the sexual than $4.5 million in grants for knowledge and health of youth and, thereby, (2) decrease the number programs that address the most of youth engaging in risky sexual behavior and the rates of STDs and pressing issues as identified teen pregnancy. Learn more about AHP at http://goo.gl/lG2rlN by our research, and we have established our own programs to meet ► Women’s Voices & the U-VISA - A qualitative study designed to assess unaddressed needs. the impact of the U-VISA program from the Latina women that have used the program to escape intimate partner violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Mos Episode Transcript: Sallie Krawcheck REID HOFFMAN
    MoS Episode Transcript: Sallie Krawcheck REID HOFFMAN: When you think of the first computer, maybe you imagine a huge mainframe ​ in a college lab in the 1950s; serious-looking people in white coats feeding in punch cards as the machinery whirs. But the story of computing started much earlier. And it probably looked a bit different than you imagine. STEVEN JOHNSON: In the 1830s Charles Babbage, the British inventor, invented ​ basically a programmable computer that was a hundred years ahead of its time. HOFFMAN: That’s Steven Johnson, host of the podcast “American Innovations”, and author of ​ many books about technology and progress that you should read. Steven’s latest book is called Farsighted: How We Make the Decisions That Matter the Most. As he wrote it, he kept thinking ​ about Babbage and this first computer. JOHNSON: These machines had almost all the key elements of modern computing. ​ They were programmable, they had the sense of a CPU, they had the sense of RAM, the sense of a hard drive-like storage. HOFFMAN: There was just one small problem: this was the 1830s. Scientists hadn’t yet ​ mastered electricity. Babbage’s designs were too complex to be built. But this didn’t stop them from sparking people’s imaginations. And one person they sparked was a mathematician named Ada Lovelace. JOHNSON: Lovelace was a young woman who was a math prodigy at a time when this ​ is very unusual. And she is now widely considered to be the first software programmer. HOFFMAN: Lovelace wrote the first example of what we’d now call “computer code”.
    [Show full text]
  • Debt Market Update: Q1 2015
    Debt Market Update Q1 2015 Edition 23 Corporate Finance KEY THEMES • Australian debt market issuance hiccups… • ASIC’s probe into BBSW setting practices coming to a head but corporate issuance abroad increases • Australian interest rates – more downward trending • Deal of the quarter – APA Group demonstrates and still significant yield curve inversion how to successfully issue off-shore with US$3.7 billion • The ECB launches its quantitative easing programme • Australians issuing off-shore – lots of success • More clarity in developing retail bond market disclosure but beware some finding pricing unresponsive obligations – a new potential source of liquidity In contrast volumes in the AMTN market remain largely unchanged with AUSTRALIAN DEBT MARKET issuance of $3.0 billion only 4 percent down on Q1 2014 and the rolling Q1 2015 saw a material drop in domestic syndicated loan volumes with 12-month average at $17.6 billion close to the previous quarter (see Figure 2). issuance of US$7.0 billion across 20 transactions, a 50 percent drop on Q1 2014 volumes and the fourth lowest quarter in the last 10 years. 12-month Figure 2: Rolling 12m A$ corporate bond market (A$b) rolling average volumes decreased to US$99 billion (see Figure 1). 25 Figure 1: Rolling 12m Australian syndicated loan volume (US$b) 20 125 250 15 100 200 10 75 150 5 50 100 No of deals 0 25 50 1 1 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q1 3Q1 1Q12 3Q12 1Q13 3Q13 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 0 0 1 1 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q1 3Q1 1Q12 3Q12 1Q13 3Q13 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 Source: Bloomberg, KPMG Analysis Rolling 12m Volume (LHS) Average Rolling 12m deal size (US$m) Compensating for the reduction in these two markets’ issuance by Source: Thomson Reuters Loan Connector, KPMG Analysis Australians off-shore was materially higher at over US$9.0 billion or more than 3x issuance in Q1 2014 and a near 50 percent increase quarter-by- Three infrastructure transactions dominated – ConnectEast’s $1,035 million quarter (see Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Theres a New Sheriff in Town Global Regulatory Enforcement After LIBOR
    BANKING & PROJECT FINANCE ENFORCEMENT confidence in the integrity of the BBA Libor setting process and the accuracy of the There’s a new figures it produces’, journalists at Bloomberg and the WSJ were highlighting the issue. Regulators, notably the US Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were sheriff in town to start investigating shortly thereafter. That investigation was to have something of a The Libor scandal fundamentally changed global long lead time, however, because it was not until 2012 that the reach and scale of the regulatory enforcement. Today, institutions are investigation were to become widely increasingly being deputised to police themselves publicised. On June 27 2012, Barclays received the raditionally, when a new sheriff rides were perceived to have been insufficiently then largest-ever fine imposed by the FSA of into town, the place is in a mess. aggressive in pursuing enforcement options £59.5 million ($87.7 million), as part of a T Society has broken down, lawlessness in the lead up to and during the financial settlement with US and UK regulators for abounds and right-thinking people avoid the crisis. In December 2008, the Madoff $453 million. Barclays also lost its chief streets. The saloon bars are full of rowdy, scandal would raise questions about whether executive, Bob Diamond. The Barclays fine intimidating gunslingers who go the Securities and Exchange Commission was soon eclipsed by the new largest-ever unchallenged – other than by fellow (SEC) had been overly light touch in its FSA fine meted out to UBS on December gunslingers. The town badly needs approach. In March 2009, Hector Sants, 19 2012, as part of a $1.5 billion settlement redemption (as does the sheriff, on then chief executive of the UK Financial with UK, US and Swiss regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • The Libor Scandal: a Need for Revised National and International Reforms and Regulations
    North East Journal of Legal Studies Volume 32 Fall 2014 Article 4 Fall 2014 The Libor Scandal: A Need For Revised National And International Reforms And Regulations Roy J. Girasa [email protected] Richard J. Kraus [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb Recommended Citation Girasa, Roy J. and Kraus, Richard J. (2014) "The Libor Scandal: A Need For Revised National And International Reforms And Regulations," North East Journal of Legal Studies: Vol. 32 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb/vol32/iss1/4 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 89 / Vol 32 / North East Journal of Legal Studies THE LIBOR SCANDAL: A NEED FOR REVISED NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFORMS AND REGULATIONS by Roy J. Girasa* Richard J. Kraus** INTRODUCTION Few individuals or even major investors are aware of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a little-known activity that profoundly affects local and world finances. The total value of securities and loans affected by LIBOR is approximately $800 trillion dollars annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    Citigroup Inc. 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10043 March 13, 2007 Dear Stockholder: We cordially invite you to attend Citigroup’s annual stockholders’ meeting. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, at 9AM at Carnegie Hall, 154 West 57th Street in New York City. The entrance to Carnegie Hall is on West 57th Street just east of Seventh Avenue. At the meeting, stockholders will vote on a number of important matters. Please take the time to carefully read each of the proposals described in the attached proxy statement. Thank you for your support of Citigroup. Sincerely, Charles Prince Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are being mailed to Citigroup stockholders beginning about March 13, 2007. Citigroup Inc. 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10043 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders Dear Stockholder: Citigroup’s annual stockholders’ meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, at 9AM at Carnegie Hall, 154 West 57th Street in New York City. The entrance to Carnegie Hall is on West 57th Street just east of Seventh Avenue. You will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership of Citigroup stock to enter the meeting. At the meeting, stockholders will be asked to ➢ elect directors, ➢ ratify the selection of Citigroup’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2007, ➢ act on certain stockholder proposals, and ➢ consider any other business properly brought before the meeting. The close of business on February 21, 2007 is the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
    [Show full text]