DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1404.4348V3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1404.4348V3 A comprehensive study of Kepler phase curves and secondary eclipses – temperatures and albedos of confirmed Kepler giant planets Daniel Angerhausen Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180; ORAU NASA Postdoctoral Fellow, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 Em DeLarme Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180; UCF, Planetary Sciences Group, Department of Physics, Orlando, FL 32816 and Jon A. Morse Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180; BoldlyGo Institute, 1370 Broadway, 5th Floor Suite 572, New York, NY 10018 Received ; accepted submitted to PASP arXiv:1404.4348v3 [astro-ph.SR] 24 Aug 2015 –2– ABSTRACT We present a comprehensive study of phase curves and secondary eclipses in the Kepler data set using all data from 16 quarters that were available in 2013- 2014. Our sample consists of 20 confirmed planets with Rp > 4Re , P < 10d, Vmag < 15. Here we derive their temperatures and albedos, with an eye towards constraining models for the formation and evolution of such planets. Where there was overlap our results confirm parameters derived by previous studies, whereas we present new results for Kepler 1b-8b, 12b-15b, 17b, 40b, 41b, 43b, 44b, 76b, 77b, and 412b derived in a consistent manner. We also present lightcurve analyses for Kepler 91b and Kepler 74b, which both show extra dimmings at times other than from the expected primary and secondary eclipses. Corrected for thermal emission we find most of the massive planets from our sample to be low in albedo (< 0.1) with a few having higher albedo (> 0.1). Subject headings: planets and satellites: atmospheres planets and satellites: fundamental parameters planets and satellites: gaseous planets planets and satellites: general –3– 1. Introduction 1.1. The Kepler mission Studying extrasolar planets is one of the major frontiers of astronomy today. The field has transformed from simple identification to comprehensive categorization and characterization of exoplanets and exoplanetary systems. Analyses of data provided by NASA’s Kepler1 mission has revolutionized this field by compiling a statistically significant number of transiting planets and planetary candidates (e.g., Borucki et al. 2010b; Borucki et al. 2011; Batalha et al. 2013; Burke et al. 2014; Rowe et al. 2015; Mullally et al. 2015). For example, Kepler data allowed researchers to discover Kepler 9b (Holman et al. 2010), the first multi-planetary system outside our solar system; Kepler 10b (Batalha et al. 2011), one of the first confirmed rocky planets outside the solar system; and Kepler 16b (Doyle et al. 2011), the first circumbinary planet. More recently the Kepler team announced the discovery of potentially habitable worlds in the Kepler 62 (Borucki et al. 2013) and Kepler 69 (Barclay et al. 2013) systems, and the near-Earth-sized planets Kepler-186f (Quintana et al. 2014) and Kepler-452b (Jenkins et al. 2015) in the habitable zones of their parent stars. 1The data presented in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST), which is managed by the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Science Mission Directorate via grant NNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts. This paper includes data collected by the Kepler mission. Funding for the Kepler mission is also provided by the NASA Science Mission Directorate. –4– Deeper analyses are possible using the exquisite Kepler data beyond merely detecting exoplanetary systems: researchers are now able to analyze large samples of planetary candidates to pin down occurrence rates such as ηearth (e.g., Howard et al. 2012; Dressing & Charbonneau 2013; Fressin et al. 2013; Petigura et al. 2013; Burke et al. 2015), find non-transiting planets via transit timing variations (Ballard et al. 2011), perform phase-curve analyses (Faigler et al. 2013), and may eventually even be able to detect exomoons (Kipping et al. 2013) and exotrojans (Hippke & Angerhausen 2015). For the close-in, and therefore hot, planets around bright, high-signal host stars in the Kepler data set, we are able to analyze secondary eclipses, i.e., the modulated flux from the star-planet system when the light (reflection and thermal emission) of the planet disappears during its passage behind the parent star. Differential measurements then help us to characterize physical parameters of the planet such as albedo and temperature. Measuring such quantities, together with complementary spectroscopic measurements, can provide contraints on models for the formation and atmospheric photochemistry of such close-in planets (e.g., Line et al. 2010; Moses et al. 2011; Visscher & Moses 2011) 1.2. Transits and eclipses Systems with transiting extrasolar planets can offer two important observational opportunities for deriving physical parameters of the planets. In primary transit the planet crosses the star. From a broadband transit-lightcurve, in this case, one can measure the 2 planetary radius Rp in units of the stellar radius R∗. The depth of the transit is ∼ (Rp/R∗) , which for a Jupiter radius planet transiting a sun-like star, is of the order of ∼ 1% (e.g., Henry et al. 2000). If the geometry (inclination, eccentricity) is right the planet also disappears behind its –5– Table 1. Kepler Quarters used in our analysis KOI LC Quarters SC Quarters 1 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,15 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 3 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,14 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 7 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,15 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,15 10 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 13 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 17 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,14 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12 18 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 20 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,15 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 97 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 98 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 127 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2,3,4,5,6,7 128 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2,3,4,5,6,7 135 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 196 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 3,4,5,6,7 200 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 3,4,5,6,7 202 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 3,4,5,6,7 203 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,14 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 204 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 3,4,5,6,7 428 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,14 – 1658 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,12,13,15 – 2133 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 – Note. — For our analysis we used all data available prior to data release Q16, August 2013 –6– host star in a so-called secondary eclipse. For a 2000 K hot Jupiter-size planet, the typical flux deficit during secondary eclipse is ∼ 200 ppm at ∼ 2µm in the near-infrared and even larger at longer wavelengths, but considerably smaller at optical wavelengths (400-900 nm) at which Kepler observes. However, for host stars that are bright enough, Kepler’s outstanding sensitivity provides a direct measure of the planet’s disk-averaged day side flux for some of its targets, particularly close-in gas giants – so called ’Hot Jupiters’ and ’Hot Neptunes’. Observing secondary eclipses combined with planetary phase curves can help us to characterize the planet and its atmosphere. For example, the depth of the secondary eclipse can constrain the albedo of the planet, while the timing and width of the secondary eclipse can help determine its orbital parameters. Comparing the amplitude of the reflected light in the phase curve with the depth of the secondary eclipse can constrain the day and night side temperatures, and therefore confirm the planetary nature of a candidate that is not self-luminous, and help to understand day to night side heat exchange.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitability of Planets on Eccentric Orbits: Limits of the Mean Flux Approximation
    A&A 591, A106 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628073 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Habitability of planets on eccentric orbits: Limits of the mean flux approximation Emeline Bolmont1, Anne-Sophie Libert1, Jeremy Leconte2; 3; 4, and Franck Selsis5; 6 1 NaXys, Department of Mathematics, University of Namur, 8 Rempart de la Vierge, 5000 Namur, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, 60st St George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S3H8, Canada 3 Banting Fellow 4 Center for Planetary Sciences, Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada 5 Univ. Bordeaux, LAB, UMR 5804, 33270 Floirac, France 6 CNRS, LAB, UMR 5804, 33270 Floirac, France Received 4 January 2016 / Accepted 28 April 2016 ABSTRACT Unlike the Earth, which has a small orbital eccentricity, some exoplanets discovered in the insolation habitable zone (HZ) have high orbital eccentricities (e.g., up to an eccentricity of ∼0.97 for HD 20782 b). This raises the question of whether these planets have surface conditions favorable to liquid water. In order to assess the habitability of an eccentric planet, the mean flux approximation is often used. It states that a planet on an eccentric orbit is called habitable if it receives on average a flux compatible with the presence of surface liquid water. However, because the planets experience important insolation variations over one orbit and even spend some time outside the HZ for high eccentricities, the question of their habitability might not be as straightforward. We performed a set of simulations using the global climate model LMDZ to explore the limits of the mean flux approximation when varying the luminosity of the host star and the eccentricity of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuchner, M. & Seager, S., Extrasolar Carbon Planets, Arxiv:Astro-Ph
    Extrasolar Carbon Planets Marc J. Kuchner1 Princeton University Department of Astrophysical Sciences Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 S. Seager Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington DC 20015 [email protected] ABSTRACT We suggest that some extrasolar planets . 60 ML will form substantially from silicon carbide and other carbon compounds. Pulsar planets and low-mass white dwarf planets are especially good candidate members of this new class of planets, but these objects could also conceivably form around stars like the Sun. This planet-formation pathway requires only a factor of two local enhancement of the protoplanetary disk’s C/O ratio above solar, a condition that pileups of carbonaceous grains may create in ordinary protoplanetary disks. Hot, Neptune- mass carbon planets should show a significant paucity of water vapor in their spectra compared to hot planets with solar abundances. Cooler, less massive carbon planets may show hydrocarbon-rich spectra and tar-covered surfaces. The high sublimation temperatures of diamond, SiC, and other carbon compounds could protect these planets from carbon depletion at high temperatures. arXiv:astro-ph/0504214v2 2 May 2005 Subject headings: astrobiology — planets and satellites, individual (Mercury, Jupiter) — planetary systems: formation — pulsars, individual (PSR 1257+12) — white dwarfs 1. INTRODUCTION The recent discoveries of Neptune-mass extrasolar planets by the radial velocity method (Santos et al. 2004; McArthur et al. 2004; Butler et al. 2004) and the rapid development 1Hubble Fellow –2– of new technologies to study the compositions of low-mass extrasolar planets (see, e.g., the review by Kuchner & Spergel 2003) have compelled several authors to consider planets with chemistries unlike those found in the solar system (Stevenson 2004) such as water planets (Kuchner 2003; Leger et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulating (Sub)Millimeter Observations of Exoplanet Atmospheres in Search of Water
    University of Groningen Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Simulating (Sub)Millimeter Observations of Exoplanet Atmospheres in Search of Water September 5, 2018 Author: N.O. Oberg Supervisor: Prof. Dr. F.F.S. van der Tak Abstract Context: Spectroscopic characterization of exoplanetary atmospheres is a field still in its in- fancy. The detection of molecular spectral features in the atmosphere of several hot-Jupiters and hot-Neptunes has led to the preliminary identification of atmospheric H2O. The Atacama Large Millimiter/Submillimeter Array is particularly well suited in the search for extraterrestrial water, considering its wavelength coverage, sensitivity, resolving power and spectral resolution. Aims: Our aim is to determine the detectability of various spectroscopic signatures of H2O in the (sub)millimeter by a range of current and future observatories and the suitability of (sub)millimeter astronomy for the detection and characterization of exoplanets. Methods: We have created an atmospheric modeling framework based on the HAPI radiative transfer code. We have generated planetary spectra in the (sub)millimeter regime, covering a wide variety of possible exoplanet properties and atmospheric compositions. We have set limits on the detectability of these spectral features and of the planets themselves with emphasis on ALMA. We estimate the capabilities required to study exoplanet atmospheres directly in the (sub)millimeter by using a custom sensitivity calculator. Results: Even trace abundances of atmospheric water vapor can cause high-contrast spectral ab- sorption features in (sub)millimeter transmission spectra of exoplanets, however stellar (sub) millime- ter brightness is insufficient for transit spectroscopy with modern instruments. Excess stellar (sub) millimeter emission due to activity is unlikely to significantly enhance the detectability of planets in transit except in select pre-main-sequence stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio Numérico De La Dinámica De Planetas
    UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGOGICA´ NACIONAL FACULTAD DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOG´IA ESTUDIO NUMERICO´ DE LA DINAMICA´ DE PLANETAS EXTRASOLARES Tesis presentada por Eduardo Antonio Mafla Mejia dirigida por: Camilo Delgado Correal Nestor Mendez Hincapie para obtener el grado de Licenciado en F´ısica 2015 Departamento de F´ısica I Dedico este trabajo a mi mam´a, quien me apoyo en mi deseo de seguir el camino de la educaci´on. Sin su apoyo este deseo no lograr´ıa ser hoy una realidad. RESUMEN ANALÍTICO EN EDUCACIÓN - RAE 1. Información General Tipo de documento Trabajo de Grado Acceso al documento Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Biblioteca Central ESTUDIO NUMÉRICO DE LA DINÁMICA DE PLANETAS Título del documento EXTRASOLARES Autor(es) Mafla Mejia, Eduardo Antonio Director Méndez Hincapié, Néstor; Delgado Correal, Camilo Publicación Bogotá. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, 2015. 61 p. Unidad Patrocinante Universidad Pedagógica Nacional DINÁMICA DE EXOPLANETAS, LEY GRAVITACIONAL DE NEWTON, Palabras Claves ESTUDIO NUMÉRICO. 2. Descripción Trabajo de grado que se propone evidenciar si el modelo matemático clásico newtoniano, y en consecuencia las tres leyes de Kepler, se puede generalizar a cualquier sistema planetario, o solo es válido para determinados casos particulares. Para lograr esto de comparar numéricamente los efectos de las diferentes correcciones que puede adoptar la ley de gravitación de Newton para modelar la dinámica de planetas extrasolares aplicándolos en los sistemas extrasolares Gliese 876 d, Gliese 436 b y el sistema Mercurio – Sol. En los exoplanetas examinados se encontró, que en un buen grado de aproximación, la dinámica de los exoplanetas se logran describir con el modelo newtoniano, y en consecuencia, modelar su movimiento usando las leyes de Kepler.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 635, A6 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936326 & c ESO 2020 Astrophysics MCMCI: A code to fully characterise an exoplanetary system? A. Bonfanti1 and M. Gillon2 1 Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, 19C Allée du 6 Août, 4000 Liège, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astrobiology Research Unit, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, 4000 Liège, Belgium Received 16 July 2019 / Accepted 29 December 2019 ABSTRACT Context. Useful information can be retrieved by analysing the transit light curve of a planet-hosting star or induced radial velocity oscillations. However, inferring the physical parameters of the planet, such as mass, size, and semi-major axis, requires preliminary knowledge of some parameters of the host star, especially its mass or radius, which are generally inferred through theoretical evolu- tionary models. Aims. We seek to present and test a whole algorithm devoted to the complete characterisation of an exoplanetary system thanks to the global analysis of photometric or radial velocity time series combined with observational stellar parameters derived either from spectroscopy or photometry. Methods. We developed an integrated tool called MCMCI. This tool combines the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach of analysing photometric or radial velocity time series with a proper interpolation within stellar evolutionary isochrones and tracks, known as isochrone placement, to be performed at each chain step, to retrieve stellar theoretical parameters such as age, mass, and radius. Results. We tested the MCMCI on the HD 219134 multi-planetary system hosting two transiting rocky super Earths and on WASP-4, which hosts a bloated hot Jupiter.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Core-Envelope Structure of 1–4× Earth-Size Planets
    Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× SPECIAL FEATURE Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars Geoffrey W. Marcya,1, Lauren M. Weissa, Erik A. Petiguraa, Howard Isaacsona, Andrew W. Howardb, and Lars A. Buchhavec aDepartment of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; and cHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review January 24, 2014) Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common planets. The Doppler reflex velocity of an Earth-size planet − around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in orbiting at 0.3 AU is only 0.2 m s 1, difficult to detect with an − our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough informa- observational precision of 1 m s 1. However, such Earth-size tion about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their planets show up as a ∼10-sigma dimming of the host star after occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. coadding the brightness measurements from each transit. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, The occurrence rate of Earth-size planets is a major goal of as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital exoplanet science. With three years of Kepler photometry in periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× hand, two groups worked to account for the detection biases in the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland)
    Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland) American Astronomical Society August, 2019 100 — New Discoveries scope (JWST), as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes coming online in the next 100.01 — Review of TESS’s First Year Survey and two decades. Future Plans The status of the TESS mission as it completes its first year of survey operations in July 2019 will bere- George Ricker1 viewed. The opportunities enabled by TESS’s unique 1 Kavli Institute, MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) lunar-resonant orbit for an extended mission lasting more than a decade will also be presented. Successfully launched in April 2018, NASA’s Tran- siting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is well on its way to discovering thousands of exoplanets in orbit 100.02 — The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Sur- around the brightest stars in the sky. During its ini- vey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics tial two-year survey mission, TESS will monitor more from 10-100 AU than 200,000 bright stars in the solar neighborhood at Eric Nielsen1; Robert De Rosa1; Bruce Macintosh1; a two minute cadence for drops in brightness caused Jason Wang2; Jean-Baptiste Ruffio1; Eugene Chiang3; by planetary transits. This first-ever spaceborne all- Mark Marley4; Didier Saumon5; Dmitry Savransky6; sky transit survey is identifying planets ranging in Daniel Fabrycky7; Quinn Konopacky8; Jennifer size from Earth-sized to gas giants, orbiting a wide Patience9; Vanessa Bailey10 variety of host stars, from cool M dwarfs to hot O/B 1 KIPAC, Stanford University (Stanford, California, United States) giants. 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology TESS stars are typically 30–100 times brighter than (Pasadena, California, United States) those surveyed by the Kepler satellite; thus, TESS 3 Astronomy, California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Califor- planets are proving far easier to characterize with nia, United States) follow-up observations than those from prior mis- 4 Astronomy, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrahot Neptune in the Neptune Desert
    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1142-z An ultrahot Neptune in the Neptune desert James S. Jenkins 1,2 ✉ , Matías R. Díaz1,2, Nicolás T. Kurtovic1, Néstor Espinoza 3, Jose I. Vines1, Pablo A. Peña Rojas1, Rafael Brahm 4,5,40, Pascal Torres4, Pía Cortés-Zuleta 1, Maritza G. Soto6, Eric D. Lopez7, George W. King8,9, Peter J. Wheatley 8,9, Joshua N. Winn 10, David R. Ciardi11, George Ricker12, Roland Vanderspek13, David W. Latham14, Sara Seager 12,15, Jon M. Jenkins 16, Charles A. Beichman11, Allyson Bieryla 14, Christopher J. Burke12, Jessie L. Christiansen 11, Christopher E. Henze16, Todd C. Klaus16, Sean McCauliff16, Mayuko Mori 17, Norio Narita 18,19,20,21,22, Taku Nishiumi 23, Motohide Tamura 17,20,21, Jerome Pitogo de Leon17, Samuel N. Quinn14, Jesus Noel Villaseñor12, Michael Vezie12, Jack J. Lissauer 16, Karen A. Collins 14, Kevin I. Collins 24, Giovanni Isopi25, Franco Mallia25, Andrea Ercolino25, Cristobal Petrovich26,27, Andrés Jordán5,28, Jack S. Acton29, David J. Armstrong 8,9, Daniel Bayliss 8, François Bouchy30, Claudia Belardi29, Edward M. Bryant8,9, Matthew R. Burleigh29, Juan Cabrera 31, Sarah L. Casewell 29, Alexander Chaushev32, Benjamin F. Cooke8,9, Philipp Eigmüller 31, Anders Erikson31, Emma Foxell8,9, Boris T. Gänsicke8, Samuel Gill8,9, Edward Gillen33, Maximilian N. Günther 12, Michael R. Goad29, Matthew J. Hooton 34, James A. G. Jackman8,9, Tom Louden8,9, James McCormac8,9, Maximiliano Moyano35, Louise D. Nielsen30, Don Pollacco8,9, Didier Queloz 33, Heike Rauer31,32,36, Liam Raynard29, Alexis M. S. Smith 31, Rosanna H. Tilbrook29, Ruth Titz-Weider31, Oliver Turner30, Stéphane Udry 30, Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry on Gliese 229B with Observed Abundance (Cf
    Atmospheric Chemistry on Substellar Objects Channon Visscher Lunar and Planetary Institute, USRA UHCL Spring Seminar Series 2010 Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt Outline • introduction to substellar objects; recent discoveries – what can exoplanets tell us about the formation and evolution of planetary systems? • clouds and chemistry in substellar atmospheres – role of thermochemistry and disequilibrium processes • Jupiter’s bulk water inventory • chemical regimes on brown dwarfs and exoplanets • understanding the underlying physics and chemistry in substellar atmospheres is essential for guiding, interpreting, and explaining astronomical observations of these objects Methods of inquiry • telescopic observations (Hubble, Spitzer, Kepler, etc) • spacecraft exploration (Voyager, Galileo, Cassini, etc) • assume same physical principles apply throughout universe • allows the use of models to interpret observations A simple model; Ike vs. the Great Red Spot Field of study • stars: • sustained H fusion • spectral classes OBAFGKM • > 75 MJup (0.07 MSun) • substellar objects: • brown dwarfs (~750) • temporary D fusion • spectral classes L and T • 13 to 75 MJup • planets (~450) • no fusion • < 13 MJup Field of study • Sun (5800 K), M (3200-2300 K), L (2500-1400 K), T (1400-700 K), Jupiter (124 K) • upper atmospheres of substellar objects are cool enough for interesting chemistry! substellar objects Dr. Robert Hurt, Infrared Processing and Analysis Center Worlds without end… • prehistory: (Earth), Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn • 1400 BC: Mercury
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Vanderburg 77 Massachusetts Avenue • Mcnair Building (MIT Building 37) • Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] •
    Andrew Vanderburg 77 Massachusetts Avenue • McNair Building (MIT Building 37) • Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] • https://avanderburg.github.io Appointments Assistant Professor of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 2021 - present Assistant Professor of Astronomy at The University of Wisconsin-Madison August 2020 - August 2021 Research Associate at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory September 2017 - present NASA Sagan Postdoctoral Fellow at The University of Texas at Austin September 2017 - August 2020 Postdoctoral Associate at Harvard University July 2017 - September 2017 Education Harvard University Cambridge, MA Ph.D. Astronomy and Astrophysics (2017) August 2013 - May 2017 A.M. Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA B.A. Physics and Astrophysics (2013) August 2009 - May 2013 Research Interests • Searching for and studying small planets orbiting other stars • Determining detailed physical properties of terrestrial planets • Learning about the origins and evolution of planetary systems • Testing theories of planetary migration by studying the architecture of planetary systems • Measuring the prevalence of planets in different galactic environments • Developing and using new data analysis techniques in astronomy, including machine learning and deep learning. Awards • 2021 Wisconsin Undergraduate Research Scholars Exceptional Mentorship Award • 2020 Scialog Fellow • 2018 NASA Exceptional Public Achievement Medal • 2017 NASA Sagan Fellow • 2016 Publications of the
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Exoplanet Habitability
    Characterizing Exoplanet Habitability Ravi kumar Kopparapu NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Eric T. Wolf University of Colorado, Boulder Victoria S. Meadows University of Washington Habitability is a measure of an environment’s potential to support life, and a habitable exoplanet supports liquid water on its surface. However, a planet’s success in maintaining liquid water on its surface is the end result of a complex set of interactions between planetary, stellar, planetary system and even Galactic characteristics and processes, operating over the planet’s lifetime. In this chapter, we describe how we can now determine which exoplanets are most likely to be terrestrial, and the research needed to help define the habitable zone under different assumptions and planetary conditions. We then move beyond the habitable zone concept to explore a new framework that looks at far more characteristics and processes, and provide a comprehensive survey of their impacts on a planet’s ability to acquire and maintain habitability over time. We are now entering an exciting era of terrestiral exoplanet atmospheric characterization, where initial observations to characterize planetary composition and constrain atmospheres is already underway, with more powerful observing capabilities planned for the near and far future. Understanding the processes that affect the habitability of a planet will guide us in discovering habitable, and potentially inhabited, planets. There are countless suns and countless earths all rotat- have the capability to characterize the most promising plan- ing around their suns in exactly the same way as the seven ets for signs of habitability and life. We are at an exhilarat- planets of our system.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Atmospheric Loss of Hot Neptune GJ 436B
    About the Atmospheric Loss of Hot Neptune GJ 436b E. Kalinicheva, V. Shematovich, and Y. Pavlyuchenkov Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia [email protected] Abstract. We applied the previously developed self-consistent 1D model of hydrogen-helium atmosphere with suprathermal electrons accounted to close-in hot neptune GJ 436 b. The height profiles of the gas tem- perature, velocity and density are computed. The two-scale structure of the planetary atmosphere was found. The mass-loss rate is found to be 9 1 about 1.6 10 gs− . × Keywords: planets and sattelites: atmospheres DOI:10.26119/978-5-6045062-0-2 2020 342 Exoplanets with extended hydrogen-helium atmospheres were discovered in abundance in recent years. Many of them are oriting very close to their host stars. Extremely high soft X-ray and ultraviolet (XUV) radiation causes the hydrodynamic escape of their planetary atmospheres. Such effects are observed for some near planetary systems with hot jupiters, sub-neptunes and super- earthes. Hot neptunes are extrasolar planets with masses and radii about the mass and radius of our Neptune in the Solar system, but are oriting closer to their host stars (closer than 0.1 AU). The thermospheric temperatures of such planets are extremely high, up to thousands Kelvin. Such temperature increase is explained by the host star UV flux absorption. Despite the discovery of a large number of extrasolar jupiters and super-earths in orbits close to their host stars, the number of hot neptunes (0.6-18 masses of Neptune, orbital period less than three days) turned out to be very small.
    [Show full text]