DOCSLIB.ORG

Faculty Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

24 25 yale law report summer 2014 faculty activities Bruce Ackerman • The Chastain effect: Using Title IX to Measure the • Delivered Lecture: “A Broader View of the Cathedral: Amy Chua publications Causal effect of Participating in High School Sports on the Centrality of the Liability rule, Correcting lectures and addresses • We the People, Vol. 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Adult Women’s Social Lives, 48 J. Socio-Economics 62 a Misapprehension,” and “tastes and Values in • “the triple Package: the rise and Fall of Cultural (Harvard University Press, 2014) (2014) (with Phoebe Clarke) Law and Economics: the Past and the Future,” Groups in America,” 92nd Street y, NyC, Feb. 4, 2014 • All eyes on obama (with Ian Ayres), Slate, Apr. 4, 2014 • Tops, Bottoms, and Versatiles: What Straight Views International University College, torino, Italy, • “the triple Package: How three Unlikely traits • Dignity Is A Constitutional Principle, N.Y. Times, of Penetrative Preferences Could Mean for Sexuality Jan. 16–17, 2014 Explain the rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in Mar. 30, 2014 Claims Under Price Waterhouse, 123 Yale L.J. 714 (2013) • taught Federal Jurisdiction Class, the Unique America,” Seattle Public Library, Feb. 12, 2014 • Presidential Power Grabs: Their Causes and Cure, (with richard Luedeman) American Approach, at the John C. Danforth Center • “the triple Package: In Conversation with Pat Bruce Ackerman Huffington Post, Feb. 10, 2014 • The U.S. Hypocrisy over Russia’s Anti-gay Laws, on religion & Politics, Washington University in Morrison,” Crawford Family Forum, Pasadena, CA, Guido Calabresi • obama’s NSA Blind Spot, L.A. Times, Jan. 26, 2014 Wash. Post, Jan. 31, 2014 (with William Eskridge) St. Louis Law School, Feb. 27, 2014 Feb. 13, 2014 • The White House Begs the Question on Mass • Delivered Lecture: John C. Danforth Distinguished • “the triple Package: the rise and Fall of Cultural Surveillance, Huffington Post, Dec. 26, 2013 Jack M. Balkin Lecture, “What About the Establishment Clause?,” Groups in America,” the Commonwealth Club, • Indefinitee xtension, Foreign Policy, Nov. 25, 2013 lectures and addresses at the John C. Danforth Center on religion & Politics, San Francisco, Feb. 14, 2014 • Making Up With europe, L.A. Times, Nov. 6, 2013 • “the Last Days of Disco: Why our Political System Washington University in St. Louis Law School, • “the triple Package,” Politics & Prose, Washington, other professional highlights is Dysfunctional,” Boston University Law School, Feb. 27, 2014 DC, Feb. 19, 2014 • yale Law Journal Conference, Feb. 28–Mar. 1, devoted Boston, MA, Nov. 16, 2013 • taught Seminar on religious Clauses of the First • “the triple Package,” Philadelphia Free Library, to Professor Ackerman’s new book, the Civil Rights • “Legal Interpretation as a Performing Art,” American Amendment, Mercer University School of Law, Feb. 20, 2014 Ian Ayres Revolution. At the end of each day, Professor Association of Law Schools Convention, New york, Ny, Macon, GA, Mar. 28, 2014 • “the triple Package,” How to Academy/5x15, royal Amy Chua Ackerman delivered a lecture responding to his com- Jan. 4, 2014 • Keynote Speaker, Law Day Luncheon, “Faith in Law Institute of British Architects, London, Feb. 27, 2014 mentators that will be published as “De-Schooling • “old School/New School Speech regulation,” and Faith in People,” Mercer University School of Law, • “the triple Package,” Asia House, London, Feb. 28, Constitutional Law,” as part of The Yale Law Journal’s Harvard Law review Conference on Freedom of the Macon, GA, Mar. 28, 2014 2014 June issue collecting the papers presented at the Press, Cambridge, MA, Feb. 15, 2014 publications • “BBC radio 4: Any Questions,” Live panel discussion, Conference publications • Il Mestiere di Giudice: Pensieri di un Accademico royal High School, Bath, UK, Feb. 28, 2014 • Professor Ackerman was awarded the Berlin Prize • The New originalism and the Uses of History, 82 Americano (The Judge’s Job: Thoughts of an • “the triple Package,” Bath Literary Festival, Bath, UK, by the American Academy in Berlin to support his Fordham L. Rev. 641 (2013) American Academic), Il Mulino, 2013 Mar. 1, 2014 scholarly leave in Germany during the academic year • The establishment Clause: An Interview with Judge • “Keynote Address: raising a Globally Competitive Guido Calabresi, in Religion & Politics, in conjunction Jack M. Balkin 2014–2015 Robert A. Burt Workforce,” Women’s Leadership Breakfast, Chicago Dennis e. Curtis lectures and addresses with a scholarly lecture given at the John C. Danforth Executives’ Club, Palmer House, Chicago, Mar. 5, 2014 Ian Ayres • “Conflicts between Patient Surrogates, Health Center on religion & Politics of Washington publications lectures and addresses Care Providers and Hospital Attorneys,” University University in St. Louis, made for purposes of legal • The Triple Package: How Three Unlikely Traits • “Beyond Diversification:t he Pervasive Problem of Pennsylvania Medical School Grand rounds, education, available at http://religionandpolitics. Explain the Rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in of Excessive Fees and ‘Dominated Funds’ in 401(k) Philadelphia, PA, Jan. 21, 2014 org/2014/03/27/the-establishment-clause-an-inter- America (with Jed rubenfeld) (Penguin Press, 2014) Plans,” AALS Annual Conference, New york, • “Parallels between Psychotherapy and Litigation view-with-judge-guido-calabresi/, Mar. 27, 2014 • What Drives Success? N.Y. Times, Jan. 25, 2014 (with Jed Jan. 5, 2014 to Protect oppressed Groups,” Argentine • Capitolo I - I nostri corpi ci appartengono? (Do We own rubenfeld) • “Sticks as well as Carrots: the Limited Case for Psychoanalytic Institute Study Group, Buenos Aires, our Bodies?), in Il Diritto alla Salute e la Prestazione other professional highlights Penalizing Failures to Innovate,” Innovation Law Argentina, Mar. 4, 2014 Sanitaria: Gestione delle Risorse e Principio di • Bill Maher Show, Mar. 14, 2014 Robert A. Burt Beyond IP, Information Society Project Conference, • “Liberty and Justice for All”: University of Palermo Autodeterminazione, a cura di Michele Sesta • CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360, Feb. 3, 2014 yale Law School, Mar. 31, 2014 Law School, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Mar. 5–6; (Maggioli Editore, 2014) publications Adolfo Ibanez Law School, Santiago, Chile, Mar. 12–13 other professional highlights Dennis E. Curtis • A Randomized experiment Assessing the Accuracy of and Vina del Mar, Chile, Mar. 14, 2014 • Judged Hugh Lawson Moot Court Final round lectures and addresses Microsoft’s “Bing It on” Challenge Claims, 26 Loy. L. Competition, Mercer University School of Law, • Speaker: “representing Justice,” at the recognition of Rev. 1 (2014) (with Emad Atiq, Sheng Li, Michelle Lu, Guido Calabresi Macon, GA, Mar. 28, 2014 the order of the Coif Biennial Book Award (with Judith Christine tsang & tom Maher) lectures and addresses • respondent to Justice Antonin Scalia, the Judge resnik), 2014 AALS Annual Luncheon, New york, Ny, • The No Reading Problem in Consumer Contract Law, 66 • Delivered Lecture: “Federalismo in Europa e Guido Calabresi Fellowship in religion & Law speech Jan. 4, 2014 Stan. L. Rev. 545 (2014) (with Alan Schwartz) negli Stati Uniti: Economia, Politica e Differenze at St. thomas More Chapel at yale, New Haven, Ct, • Presented paper: “Inventing Democratic Courts: Morali” (“Federalism in Europe and the United Apr. 3, 2014 reflections of the Architecture of Courts and States: Economics, Politics, and Moral Differences”), Aspirations for Justice,” (with Judith resnik), University of turin, turin, Italy, Jan. 15, 2014 Architecture, Urban Space, and Democracy, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, Feb. 22, 2014 26 27 yale law report summer 2014 faculty activities publications William N. Eskridge, Jr. • “Innovative Finance for a Clean Energy Future: • Member of Advisory Selection Committee, • Constructing Courts: Architecture, the Ideology of lectures and addresses the Connecticut Model,” Green Bank Academy, Fellowship Program, open Society Institute, NyC Judging, and the Public Sphere (with Judith resnik & • Panel Presentation, “Congressional overrides of Washington, DC, Mar. 5, 2014 • Editorial Board, revista de teoría Jurídica Allison tait), in Law, Culture & Visual Studies (richard Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, • States Innovate on Energy Security,” Securing Power: (Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires) Sherwin & Anne Wagner eds. , Springer Publishing 1967–2011,” ABA, Administrative Law Section, EnergyBiz Forum, Washington, DC, Mar. 4, 2014 • Law Journal Symposium, “the Meaning of the Civil Company, 2013) Nov. 7, 2014. Similar Presentation to Faculty • “Green Leadership in the 21st Century,” Future of rights revolution: “Constitutional Change and the other professional highlights Workshops at yale, Berkeley, Chicago, and Green Initiatives, Gateway Community College First role of Social Movements,” panel chair, Feb. 28, 2014 • recipient of the biennial Book Award from the Pennsylvania, Jan.–Apr. 2014 Green Leadership Event, New Haven, Ct, Mar. 25, 2014 Drew S. Days III order of the Coif for the book, Representing Justice: • Keynote Address, “Cinderella’s Sequal: After Marriage publications Heather K. Gerken owen M. Fiss Invention, Controversy and Rights in City-States Equality, What Next?,” Conference on After Marriage, • Getting Clean energy Policy Right (with Varun lectures and addresses and Democratic Courtrooms (with Judith resnik) Florida State University School of Law, Jan. 31, 2014 Sivaram), EnergyBiz 44 (Jan./Feb. 2014)
Recommended publications
  • On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary

    On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary

    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2020 On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary Leah Litman University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Deeva Shah Keker, Van Nest & Peters Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/2182 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Litman, Leah. "On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary." Deeva Shah, co-author. Nw. U. L. Rev. 115, no. 2 (2020): 599-645. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 2020 by Leah Litman & Deeva Shah Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 115, No. 2 Essay ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE JUDICIARY Leah M. Litman & Deeva Shah ABSTRACT—This Essay examines the legal profession’s role in sexual harassment, particularly in the federal courts. It argues that individuals in the profession have both an individual and collective responsibility for the professional norms that have allowed harassment to happen with little recourse for the people subject to the harassment. It suggests that the legal profession should engage in a sustained, public reflection about how our words, actions, attitudes, and institutional arrangements allow harassment to happen, and about the many different ways that we can prevent and address harassment.

  • Judicial Ethics in the #Metoo World

    JUDICIAL ETHICS IN THE #METOO WORLD Renee Knake Jefferson* This Article examines the judicial role in professional ethics regulation through the lens of the judiciary’s own self-governance on sexual misconduct. The #MeToo movement exposed the long-enduring silence of the courts. Headlines featured judges like Alex Kozinski, who retired from the Ninth Circuit in 2018 after numerous former clerks went to the media with credible allegations of sexual misconduct. In 2019, at the instruction of Chief Justice Roberts, the federal judiciary amended the Code of Conduct for United States Judges to make clear that misconduct includes unwanted, offensive, or abusive sexual conduct and to include protections for those who report such behavior. But many argue the reforms do not go far enough. Congress, in the wake of media outcries, held hearings in early 2020. The judiciary’s tepid response holds consequences not only for the judges and the survivors of sexual misconduct but also for the legal profession as a whole. Leaving meaningful #MeToo remedies to journalists and lawmakers threatens judicial independence; it sets a precedent that could influence further intervention into other areas of professional conduct governance that is traditionally reserved for the courts. After offering additional reforms for addressing sexual misconduct in the judiciary, this Article concludes by reflecting on lessons that can be drawn about the judicial role in professional ethics regulation more broadly. * Doherty Chair in Legal Ethics and Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center. This Article was prepared for the Colloquium entitled The Judicial Role in Professional Regulation, hosted by the Fordham Law Review and the Stein Center for Law and Ethics on October 9, 2020, at Fordham University School of Law.

  • Judicial Ethics in the #Metoo World

    Fordham Law Review Volume 89 Issue 4 Article 6 2020 Judicial Ethics in the #MeToo World Renee Knake Jefferson Doherty Chair in Legal Ethics and Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Renee Knake Jefferson, Judicial Ethics in the #MeToo World, 89 Fordham L. Rev. 1197 (2021). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol89/iss4/6 This Colloquium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JUDICIAL ETHICS IN THE #METOO WORLD Renee Knake Jefferson* This Article examines the judicial role in professional ethics regulation through the lens of the judiciary’s own self-governance on sexual misconduct. The #MeToo movement exposed the long-enduring silence of the courts. Headlines featured judges like Alex Kozinski, who retired from the Ninth Circuit in 2018 after numerous former clerks went to the media with credible allegations of sexual misconduct. In 2019, at the instruction of Chief Justice Roberts, the federal judiciary amended the Code of Conduct for United States Judges to make clear that misconduct includes unwanted, offensive, or abusive sexual conduct and to include protections for those who report such behavior. But many argue the reforms do not go far enough. Congress, in the wake of media outcries, held hearings in early 2020.
  • Chapter 2 Qualifications for the Job

    Chapter 2 Qualifications for the Job

    Table of Contents Chapter 1 The Lay of the Land ...................................................................................................... 3 A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 B. The Downturn in Law Faculty Hiring .............................................................................. 3 C. Types of Academic Positions ........................................................................................... 3 D. Clinical Teaching ............................................................................................................. 6 E. The Market ....................................................................................................................... 7 F. Salary ................................................................................................................................ 8 Chapter 2 Qualifications for the Job .......................................................................................... 8 A. Clerkships and Law School Credentials .......................................................................... 8 B. Publications ...................................................................................................................... 9 C. Teaching Experience ........................................................................................................ 11 D. Recommendations ...........................................................................................................
  • On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary

    On Sexual Harassment in the Judiciary

    Copyright 2020 by Leah Litman & Deeva Shah Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 115, No. 2 Essay ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE JUDICIARY Leah M. Litman & Deeva Shah ABSTRACT—This Essay examines the legal profession’s role in sexual harassment, particularly in the federal courts. It argues that individuals in the profession have both an individual and collective responsibility for the professional norms that have allowed harassment to happen with little recourse for the people subject to the harassment. It suggests that the legal profession should engage in a sustained, public reflection about how our words, actions, attitudes, and institutional arrangements allow harassment to happen, and about the many different ways that we can prevent and address harassment. AUTHORS—Leah M. Litman is an assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. She clerked for two years and has advised students about clerkships. Deeva Shah is an associate at Keker, Van Nest & Peters. She clerked for two years after graduating from the University of Michigan Law School. She has advised numerous state and federal courts on improving the policies and processes governing inappropriate conduct in the workplace. She is also a board member of Law Clerks for Diversity, a structured mentorship program to increase diversity in federal clerkships. The authors thank Gautam Hans, Veronica Root Martinez, Don Herzog, and Erin Chapman for helpful comments and conversations. 599 N O R T H W E S T E R N U N I V E R S I T Y L A W R E V I E W INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
  • An Alternative View of Immigrant Exceptionalism, Particularly As It Relates to Blacks: a Response to Chua and Rubenfeld

    An Alternative View of Immigrant Exceptionalism, Particularly As It Relates to Blacks: a Response to Chua and Rubenfeld

    An Alternative View of Immigrant Exceptionalism, Particularly As It Relates to Blacks: A Response to Chua and Rubenfeld Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown* The contrast between Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld’s The Triple Package (Chua & Rubenfeld 2.0) and Chua’s previous work, World on Fire (Chua 1.0), is striking. Chua & Rubenfeld 2.0 contends that particular ethnic and religious groups are spectacularly successful in the United States because of a “triple package” of traits that are largely cultural; however, there is nary a word in Chua & Rubenfeld 2.0 about the role that law might play in contributing to wealth acquisition among the subject groups. In contrast, Chua 1.0 clearly acknowledges the role of law through “law-in-culture” when accounting for the wealth of those whom Chua calls “market- dominant minorities.” “Law-in-culture” consists of binding rules, such as default contract terms, that often underlie market relations in perilous “third world” environments. While these rules are not enforceable by the state, they are powerful because those who ignore them risk ostracism by their co-ethnics, with whom they often contract. Perhaps because Chua & Rubenfeld 2.0 focuses on particular ethnic groups within the United States—a country that epitomizes the protection of property and contract rights—it overlooks the potential role of “law-in-culture” in accounting for wealth acquisition of particular groups. This oversight is significant. Many of the subject Copyright © 2015 Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown. * George Washington Institute of Public Policy Fellow and Associate Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School (1999); M.Phil.
  • Law School 2003–2004 Uut1,20 Aelwschool Law Yale 2003 10, August

    Law School 2003–2004 Uut1,20 Aelwschool Law Yale 2003 10, August

    bulletin of yale university Periodicals postage paid bulletin of yale university New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2003–2004 August 10, 2003 Yale Law School bulletin of yale university Series 99 Number 8 August 10, 2003 Bulletin of Yale University The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and affirmatively Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, seeks to attract to its faculty, staff, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut status as a special disabled veteran, veteran of the Vietnam era, or other covered veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Issued sixteen times a year: one time a year in May, November, and December; two University policy is committed to affirmative action under law in employment of times a year in June and September; three times a year in July; six times a year in August women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans. Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to the Director of the Office for Editor: David J.