Putting Vitomers First, Empowering Employees to Get Results, Cutting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Putting Vitomers First, Empowering Employees to Get Results, Cutting DOCUMENT RESUME ED 384 295 HE 028 408 AUTHOR Gore, Al TITLE Creating a Government That Works Better & CostsLess. Status Report. Report of the National Performance Review. INSTITUTION Office of the Vice President, Washington, DC. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-045204-X PUB DATE Sep 94 NOTE 123p.; The twelve recommendations pertaining tothe U.S. Department of Education are reportedon pages 86-87. For related documents,see ED 379 992 and HE 028 407-409. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cost Effectiveness; *Efficiency; Elementary Secondary Education; Eligibility; Federal Aid; *Federal Government; Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; Federal Regulation; Government Role; Higher Education; Information Dissemination; Institutional Administration; Institutional Evaluation; Organizational Change; Professional Development; Program Costs; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Program Termination; Public Agencies; Research Administration; Staff Development IDENTIFIERS ClintoAdministration; Debt Collection; *Department of Education; Elementary Secondary EducationAct; *National Performance Review ABSTRACT This publication reports onprogress 1 year into the Clinton Administration's "Reinventing Government"initiative, a long-term effort at significantly revamping the federalgovernment's opera'ons. A preliminary chapter notes the culture change involved in the reinvention process. Individual chaptersthen report progress for each of the four principles underlying the initiative.These are: putting vitomers first, empowering employeesto get results, cutting red tape, and cutting back to basics. A finalchapter identifies continuing challenges in the reinventionprocess. Appendices detail the status of major recommendations byagency and those affecting governmental systems, summarize savings to date,and list presidential and congressional actions takento date. As an example, in reporting on the status of 12 recommendationsfor the Department of Education, the report notes such achievementsas: implementation of a comprehensive planning process to improve department-wide programs and internal management; reauthorization of theElementary and Secondary Education Act; implementation ofa new direct student loan program that will save taxpayers about $4.3billion over the first 5 years, and $1 billion each year thereafter;significant progress in debt collection; implementation of a "one-stop shopping" approach for information dissemination and assistance;encouragement of employees to adopt individual development plansand to use performance measurement in implementing department policy;and identification and elimination of 64 cumbersome,ineffective rules by a "Low Hanging Apples Team." (JB) CREATINGA I. GOVERNMENT THAT XTO REPO STATUS 1994 SEPTEMBER, ( BEST COPY AVAILABLE \ () Ii _ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OPKe ot Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) tiAins document has been reproduced OS received from the person or organization originating 0 n Minor changes have been made to mprove reproduction quality Potnts ot weer or OpniOnS stated m docu most do not AeCeSSarrly represent OEM Postoon or 'witty CREATING A GOVERNMENT THATWORKS BETTER & COSTS LESS STATUS REPORT NATIONAL a11- REVIEW September 1994 I of the tS ()Hit Suprnutrndrnt01Do, \tail Slop SS( )1'. Washinyion 2413()2 ISBN 0-16-045204-X 4 NATIONAL CONTENTS =$' REVIEW INTRODUCTION 1 RESULTS OF REINVENTION 4 NOT SUITING ON A SHELF 7 WHAT'S AT SIAM: 9 CULTURE CHANGE: REINVENTING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ...11 CATAIYSTS ()I, REINVENTION 15 1N RECOVERY: FEDERAL. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 16 PUNCHING THE CLOCK NOT: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 18 Pw)CESSES, AND PARTNERSHIPS: CUSTOMS SERVICE 20 CUSTOMERS ON TOP: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANI) URBAN DEVELOPMENT 23 REINVENTION: A CONTINUOUS PROCESS 24 PROGRESS REPORT 27 CHAPTER ONE: PUTTING CUSTOMERS FIRST 29 CusTomER GOVERN:OEN"' CHANGES Its APPROACH SHTING CUSTONIER SERVICE STANDARDS 31 INFoRNtArioN Tct iNoLoGY: A HOST OF CUSTOMER BENEFITS 32 MAI'S, ANYONF> 33 PosTAL Dist I\TRY 34 CoNct.ustoN 36 CHAPTER Two: EMPOWERING EMPLOYEES TO GET RESUITS 37 Ii IL TRANSFORMATION OF FEDERAL WORK 38 NATR)NAI PARI NERstup Cot .N(11.: LAUNCHING A NEW ERA 01. COOPERATION 39 AccouNmilitirv: St IIFTIN( ; FROM INPUTS TO RESUEI WORKFOR( I 1.F.1 )U( 711()N 43 STATUS REPORT, SEPTEMBER 1994 (7,11ANGE. AI THE TOP 44 EN1PLOYNIENT RESTRICTIONS IN LEGISLATION 46 CoNcLusioN 47 CHAFFER THREE: CUTTING RED TAPE 49 EARNING THE MONIKER 50 PRocuREmENT REFoRm 51 PuTrING "SERvicEs" BACK INTO GSA 54 OMB: MORE COLLABORATION 54 OSHA: ONE FOOT IN FRONT OF TEM OTHER" 56 CRF.ATIVE APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMENTAL PRorEcrtoN 57 BRANDEIS' VISION: STATE AND LOCAL EXPERIMENTATION 59 CommuNrrY EmPowERmENT 61 RURAL DEVELOPMENT 62 CoNcLusioN 62 CHAPTER FOUR: CUTTING BACK TO BASICS 63 LEss BoRRowiNG, MORE REINVENTION 63 SLOWING THE RED INK 64 MAKING THE TOUGH CHOICES 65 ANOTHER TOOL FOR THE PRESIDENT 66 CAN DEFENSE AFFORD ITS HEALTH UNivERsrn? 66 CoNci USION 67 STILL TO Do: LOTS MORE 69 ENDNOTES 75 APPENDICES 81 A: STATUS 01: MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS BY AGENCY 83 B: STATI'S OF MAJOR RECONIMENDATIONS AITE( :TING GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEMS 107 C: SI AIMARY 01: SAVINGS 'TO DATE 119 D: PREsIDENTIAL AND ( oNGRLssioNAI HoNs TAKEN TcI)AI 123 6 INTRODUCTION NATIONAL t=1 REVIEW INTRODUCTION REVIEW Len Davis, who left the Army in Joe Thompson, the office director, told Vice 1969 after his second tour of duty President Gore in March. "We stepped back in Vietnam, had never had much away from what we were doing and said, luck with the old Veterans you know, what are the difficulties that we Administration. have, and we narrowed it down to two Over the years, he lived in different parts things: The results of our efforts frequently of the country, but his experiences varied lit- frustrated if not angered our customers, and tle. Whether buying a house, seeking the processes that we used in the office to do medical care, or just awaiting his benefit business sucked the life out of our own em- check, he never dealt with the same person ployees. twice. Each time he called, or each time his "Other than that," he added with a smile, call was transferred among VA employees, "everything was going pretty good." he had to tell his story again. Employees visited VA hospitals and held Employees of what's now the Veterans focus groups with veterans who described Affairs Department were no happier. In try- ing to help veterans, each toiled in anonymity, performing a task in classic assembly-line fashion, little different from how each worker toiled in Henry Ford's car factory of the 1920s. One opened the mail; another distributed it; another took applica- tions from veterans. What nobody did was ensure that veterans received start-to-finish satisfaction. Then Davis moved to New York Gin', where the VA's regional office of 360 employees had launched a major effort to focus on its customers 1.2 million veter- ans in 31 New York State counties and revamp its operations accordingly. It was an eve- opening experience for managers and employees alike. "We started looking at what we were doing in the regional office with the Vice President Gore, right, listens to Army veteran Len Davis at intention of trying to make things better," NPR's first "hammer awards" ceremony in March 1994. 8 3 STATUS REPORT, SEPTEMBER 1994 their problems in dealing with the office. empowered employees, cut red tape, and re- The employees also visited such well- duced costs. regarded businesses as AT&T, IBM, and Metropolitan Life to learn how they satisfY their customers. They then met in small groups to design a new process from scratch. RESULTS OF REINVENTION In that process, small teams of employees each work with a small number of veterans from start to finish. One person serves as a The New York office of the Veterans contact point for a veteran, who no longer Affairs Department is not alone in reinvent- must tell his or her story again and again. ing itself. One year ago the Administration Overall, the New York office has greatly promised a government that "works better streamlined its operations, giving veterans and costs less." It is starting to deliver. better service in less time. It has reduced its Government is, indeed, "working better." backlog of pending cases by well over a Thanks to the President, Congress, executive third, cut the steps in claims processing from agencies, and federal workers at all levels, 25 to eight, shrunk the rime veterans must over 90 percent of NPR's proposals have wait to see a counselor from 30 minutes to moved forward implemented by three, and cut processing costs. executive order or agency action, proposed Veterans are happier. Reflecting on his in legislation, and so forth. Here's a snapshot first experience in New York, Davis said, of some other government-wide accomplish- ments: I got on the phone, they transferred ore ... to alady who turned out to be very The President issued 22 directives (see held to me... Therese Aprile. Therese Appendix D) and signed performance told me that shed bemycontact person, I agreements with five Cabinet could get back in touch with her; that secretaries and leaders of two other any questions I had, I could get to her, agencies. The directives implement and I thought, "Something strange and NPR recommendations on such different going on here," c cruse I'd never subjects as customer service,
Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Senior Executive Biography
    Department of Veterans Affairs Senior Executive Biography James Rice, MA Director, Oscar G. Johnson VAMC, Iron Mountain, MI Veterans Health Administration On April 10, 2011, James W. Rice was appointed Medical Center Director at the Oscar G. Johnson VA Medical Center in Iron Mountain, MI. The Oscar G. Johnson VA Medical Center is a primary and secondary level care facility with 13 medical/surgical beds and four intensive care unit beds. Its Community Living Center has 40 beds. As Director, Mr. Rice oversees all aspects of this level 3 medical center with an annual operating budget of more than $120 million. The Oscar G. Johnson VA Medical Center was rated nationally as a top performing hospital by the Joint Commission in 2011. Our high quality health care to nearly 26,000 Veterans includes primary care, specialty care, inpatient care and extended support services. We also have six Community Outpatient Clinics in Ironwood, MI, Hancock, MI, Marquette, MI, Menominee, MI, Sault Ste Marie, MI and Rhinelander, WI. In addition, we also have a Rural Outreach Clinic in Manistique, MI. The Oscar G. Johnson VA Medical Center was established in 1950 and recently celebrated its 60th anniversary . Prior to assuming this position, Mr. Rice served as the Quality Management Officer for the Veterans In Partnership Network (VISN 11) from October 2006 to April 2011 where he was responsible for the development, oversight, coordination, and leadership of all quality and performance programs throughout the VISN. In addition, Mr. Rice served as the Acting Medical Center Director at the Aleda E. Lutz VA Medical Center (Saginaw, Michigan) from July 2009 to December 2009, at the Edward Hines Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Conti-Brown*
    CONTI-BROWN 64 STAN. L. REV. 409 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2012 3:58 PM ELECTIVE SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY Peter Conti-Brown* Government bailouts are expensive, unjust, and unpopular, and they usually represent dramatic deviations from the rule of law. They are also, in some cases, necessary. The problem that bailouts pose, then, is that they are almost always inimical to the interests of society, except when they are not. This complexity is ignored under the recent Dodd-Frank Act, which improbably guarantees an end to taxpayer bailouts. Indeed, much of the Act makes bailouts more likely, not less, by making the wrong kind of bailouts available far too often. This Article proposes to solve the problem of bailouts by retaining governmental ability to make the right kinds of bailouts possible through forcing the bailed-out firms to internalize the bailout costs. The proposal—called “elective shareholder liability”—allows bank shareholders two options. They must either change their bank’s capital structure to include dramatically less debt, consistent with the consensus recommendation of leading economists; or alternatively, they must add a bailout exception to their bank’s limited- shareholder-liability status, thus requiring shareholders—not taxpayers—to cover the ultimate costs of the bank’s failure. This liability would be structured as a governmental collection, similar to a tax assessment, for the recoupment of all bailout costs against the shareholders on a pro rata basis. It would also include an up-front stay on collections to ensure that there are, in fact, taxpayer losses to be recouped and to mitigate government incentives for overbailout, political manipulation, and crisis exacerbation.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA: in Or Out?
    Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General FEMA: In or Out? OIG-09-25 February 2009 OIG Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General Introduction “Since the end of World War II, Congress and Presidents have debated, formulated, and revised administrative responsibilities for emergency management.”1 Some of the important questions that have been the subject of debate over the past 60 years, and that are particularly relevant today in the “FEMA In or Out” debate, include: � What the jurisdictional boundaries of the agency charged with emergency management should be; � How responsibility for new or emerging threats should be assigned; � Whether it is necessary (or advisable) to distinguish between natural and manmade threats; � What is meant by “all-hazards,” and what elements need to be present in an agency with an all-hazards mission; � What the relationship between crisis management and consequence management should be; and � What the relationships among the federal, state and local governments should be during a disaster, and whether the relationships should change in the face of a catastrophe. On December 17, 2008, Congressman James L. Oberstar, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, reopened the debate by submitting a memorandum to President-elect Barack H. Obama, recommending that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “be re-instated as an independent, cabinet-level agency reporting directly to the President.”2 Two days later, Congressman Bennie G. Thompson, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, recommended the opposite–that FEMA remain a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), warning that “FEMA removal from DHS would likely result in the hamstringing of 1 Henry B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Work of Future The
    Communications and Society Program Bollier THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments THE FUTURE OF WORK By David Bollier Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, MD 21658 11-003 THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments By David Bollier Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-543-9 11/004 Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone .............................................................vii THE FUTURE OF WORK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS, David Bollier Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress January 3, 1993 to January 3, 1995
    ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1993 TO JANUARY 3, 1995 FIRST SESSION—January 5, 1993, 1 to November 26, 1993 SECOND SESSION—January 25, 1994, 2 to December 1, 1994 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—J. DANFORTH QUAYLE, 3 of Indiana; ALBERT A. GORE, JR., 4 of Tennessee PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—ROBERT C. BYRD, of West Virginia SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—WALTER J. STEWART, 5 of Washington, D.C.; MARTHA S. POPE, 6 of Connecticut SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MARTHA S. POPE, 7 of Connecticut; ROBERT L. BENOIT, 6 of Maine SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—THOMAS S. FOLEY, 8 of Washington CLERK OF THE HOUSE—DONNALD K. ANDERSON, 8 of California SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—WERNER W. BRANDT, 8 of New York DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—JAMES T. MALLOY, 8 of New York DIRECTOR OF NON-LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES—LEONARD P. WISHART III, 9 of New Jersey ALABAMA Ed Pastor, Phoenix Lynn Woolsey, Petaluma SENATORS Bob Stump, Tolleson George Miller, Martinez Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco Howell T. Heflin, Tuscumbia Jon Kyl, Phoenix Ronald V. Dellums, Oakland Richard C. Shelby, Tuscaloosa Jim Kolbe, Tucson Karen English, Flagstaff Bill Baker, Walnut Creek REPRESENTATIVES Richard W. Pombo, Tracy Sonny Callahan, Mobile ARKANSAS Tom Lantos, San Mateo Terry Everett, Enterprise SENATORS Fortney Pete Stark, Hayward Glen Browder, Jacksonville Anna G. Eshoo, Atherton Tom Bevill, Jasper Dale Bumpers, Charleston Norman Y. Mineta, San Jose Bud Cramer, Huntsville David H. Pryor, Little Rock Don Edwards, San Jose Spencer Bachus, Birmingham REPRESENTATIVES Leon E. Panetta, 12 Carmel Valley Earl F.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Staffs: a Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report Advisory Committee Human Radiation Lxperzments
    Interim Report of the Advisory Committee . on Human Radiation Lxperzments October 21,1994 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied. or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name. trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, ram- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS LINUMITm , . _. -.-,..- DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. ADVISORYCOMMITTEE ON HUMANRADIATION EXPERIMENTS 1726 M STREET,N.W., SUITE 600 WASHINGTON,D.C. 20036 WMORANDUM TO: Members of the Interagency Working Group Secretary Hazel O'Leary, Department of Energy Secretary William Perry, Department of Defense Attorney General Janet Reno, Department of Justice Secretary Donna Shalala. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Jesse Brown, Department of VeteransAflairs Director Alice Rivlin, Ofice of Management and Budget Director James Woolsey, Central Intelligence Agency Administrator Daniel Goldin, National Aeronautics and Space Administration FROM: The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments DATE: October 21,1994 RE: Interim Report The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments is pleased to transmit its Interim Report to the Interagency Working Group.
    [Show full text]
  • DAV-Gulf-War-Veterans.Pdf
    p a g e 6 5 CHAPTER 9 THE GULF WAR LEGACY My confidence in you is total, our cause is just. Now you must be the thunder and lightning of Desert Storm. ~ General Norman Schwarzkopf ~ CHAPTER 9 p a g e 6 6 p a g e 6 7 AS 1991 BEGAN, AMERICAN TROOPS WERE IN THE MIDDLE EAST, DEMANDING The election of Bill Clinton to the presidency in November 1992 brought Jesse Brown’s THAT IRAQ END ITS OCCUPATION OF KUWAIT. ON JANUARY 16, OPERATION days as Executive Director with the DAV to DESERT SHIELD VERY QUICKLY BECAME OPERATION DESERT STORM, AS AIRCRAFT an end. President Clinton called on Brown ATTACKED ENEMY FORCES. THE GULF WAR WAS UNDER WAY. WHEN GROUND to be his Secretary of Veterans Affairs in 1993, and “one of our own” was the joyous OPERATIONS BEGAN, IT TOOK 100 HOURS FOR COALITION FORCES TO CHASE cry heard throughout the DAV. IRAQI TROOPS FROM KUWAIT. ON FEBRUARY 27, PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH Wounded in Vietnam in 1965, Brown joined the DAV shortly after discharge from ANNOUNCED A CEASEFIRE. KUWAIT HAD BEEN LIBERATED. the Marine Corps and came on board with Back home, the Nation welcomed its returning Desert Storm veterans with a grand parade the organization’s professional team as a in Washington, D.C., led by General Norman Schwarzkopf. At the same time, the DAV DAV National Service Officer in Chicago was already working with the casualties from the Gulf War. in 1967. He rose rapidly through the DAV’s Jesse Brown, then Executive Director of the DAV’s Washington Headquarters, ranks, building a reputation as the Nation’s discussed the consequences of war in the DAV Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer-Bulletin-0608.Pdf
    JUNE 2008 Although we would like to recognize every deserving volunteer’s accomplishments, we are pleased to recognize a few of the top volunteers in each category for attaining their various levels of recognition in the DAV’s Volunteer Recognition Program. DAV TRANSPORTATION NETWORK MILES Top 3 Volunteers by Level 2/5/2008 to 3/27/2008 Name Award Level 200,000 VA Medical Center William C. Giles 203,322 Muskogee, OK Name Award Level 150,000 VA Medical Center Harlon R. Owens 154,579 Miles City, MT Gordon K. Thompson 153,098 Tampa, FL Everett Darling 152,740 Huntington, WV Name Award Level 100,000 VA Medical Center William Gamble 107,365 Miles City, MT Austin L. Miller 102,563 Fayetteville, AR Barbara E. Wright 102,315 Albuquerque, NM Name Award Level 75,000 VA Medical Center Dale Benti 83,565 Miles City, MT Jimmie Lee Kerr 83,142 Miles City, MT Yolanda G. Rodriguez 82,610 San Antonio, TX Name Award Level 50,000 VA Medical Center Leigh E. Tabor 54,565 White River Jct., VT Pablo Marquez 54,390 San Antonio, TX Michael J. Scheufeli 53,601 Minneapolis, MN Name Award Level 25,000 VA Medical Center Robert Allen Seaton 41,821 White City, OR Ann Gamble 37,310 Miles City, MT Clifford R. Boxley 32,202 Pueblo, CO 2 Name Award Level 10,000 VA Medical Center Conway Pete Ellers 24,806 Spokane, WA Rick Braley 23,760 Miles City, MT John D. Scarborough 23,559 Houston, TX Name Award Level 7,500 VA Medical Center Frank D.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Former Secretaries USMCA Letter
    September 18, 2019 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader McCarthy, Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer, As former Secretaries of Agriculture, we recognize how important agricultural trade is to the U.S. economy and rural America. We know from experience that improved market access creates significant benefits to U.S. farmers and ranchers. We believe that the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will benefit American agriculture and related industries. With Canada and Mexico being the first and second largest export markets for U.S. agricultural products, we believe USMCA makes positive improvements to one of our most critical trade deals. Currently, NAFTA supports more than 900,000 jobs in the U.S. food and agriculture sector and has amplified agricultural exports to our North American neighbors to $40 billion this past year. Before NAFTA went into effect in 1994, we were exporting only $9 billion worth of agricultural products to Canada and Mexico. The International Trade Commission’s recent economic analysis concluded that USMCA would benefit our agriculture sector and would deliver an additional $2.2 billion in U.S. economic activity. Trade is extremely vital to the livelihood of American farmers and the U.S. food industry. U.S. farm production exceeds domestic demand by 25 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Ballroom West)
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu GOPAC SEMI-ANNUAL MEETING Wednesday, November 19 2:00 p.m. Sheraton Grand Hotel (Grand Ballroom West) You are scheduled to address the GOPAC meeting at 2:00 p.m. Lynn Byrd of GOPAC will meet you at the Sheraton Grand's front entrance and escort you to the Grand Ballroom West. You will be introduced by Newt Gingrich and your speech, including Q&A, should last no more than 25 minutes. The theme of the meeting is "a time to look back, a time to look forward" and GOPAC asks that you give an analysis of the elections and what the results mean to the Republican party and the country. (Attached is information on the Senate, House, Governor, and State Legislature elections.) There will be about 75-100 people (GOPAC Charter Members and guests) in the audience; no press or media has been invited. Speeches by Alexander Haig, Frank Fahrenkopf, Governor du Pont, Jack Kemp, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and Governor Kean will precede your remarks; Pat Robertson and Donald Rumsfeld are scheduled to speak after you. Expected to be in attendance at your luncheon speech are: Congressmen Dick Cheney, Joe DioGuardi, Robert Lagomarsino, and Tom Loeffler. Author Tom Clancy (Hunt for Red October/Red Storm Rising) is also expected to attend. GOPAC Background GOPAC was formed in 1978 and its purpose is to raise funds to elect state and local Republicans nationwide. This meeting is for Charter Members, who give or raise $10,000 a year for GOPAC.
    [Show full text]