Cactus Adaptation and Conservation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cactus Adaptation and Conservation Torrey Pines Docent Society 2019 Cactus Adaptation and Conservation Cacti are in the Lodge garden, the Whitaker Garden, and almost all the trails in TPSNR, but there is a lot more to simply look for the silver Argiope spider and the cochineal. Cacti exhibit many specialized adaptive features to an arid climate. For children, the discussion can revolve around adaptation. For adults, one can highlight conservation issues that confront slow-growing cacti. Key points: • Green stem with spines? This is the first visual clue that cacti are specialized for something. What we observe are adaptations to survive in a dry climate. To reduce evaporative water loss (transpiration loss), cacti have several adaptations: ◦ Cacti make spines, which are modified leaves, to reduce surface area and to protect themselves from thirsty animals. (Nonetheless, there may be tiny foliage leaves on a very young stem.) ◦ The stem takes over the task of photosynthesis. Not only that, the stomata (microscopic openings for gas exchange) on the stem are closed during the day, and are only opened at night. ◦ Without sunlight, the plant cannot make use of carbon dioxide immediately, and so it stores the gas as malic acid, which is the taste of sour apples. During the day, the plant converts malic acid back to carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. ◦ To reduce surface area, the entire plant is made of stems or stem segments. At the extreme, Barrel cactus takes on a globe-like shape. ◦ Cacti may have ribs or tubercles which allow the stem to expand or contract depending on their water content. ◦ The stem has a heavy waxy surface (cuticle). • Some specialized spines on the barrel cactus make a sugar solution to attract ants. The ants in turn drive away insect herbivores in a food-for-protection mutualism. • For protection, prickly-pear-related cacti also make glochids, essentially tiny, hair-like spines. They appear at the base of spines and on the fruits, which become the prickly-pears. • The adaptations to survive in a dry climate come at a cost and that is cacti grow very slowly. As a result, many cacti and some succulent species are threatened because of loss of habitat and illegal poaching for gardening and home décor. What is interesting about cacti? Most people know what a cactus is. They are the ones with succulent green stems and fierce spines. We may consider cacti as iconic of the American Southwest deserts, but the cactus family, Cactaceae, is quite diverse throughout the Americas. There are about 127 genera and close to 2,000 species in the family. The plants also have a large variation in shape and size. Members of the family can be found in hot deserts, cold deserts, dry grasslands, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, and even alpine zones above the treeline. Regardless, these are all semi-arid or arid habitats. Where are the leaves? What are the roles of the spines? Why doesn’t the Indian fig have spines? Why are the stems green? Is this how I can survive in the desert? In short, cacti are extremely well adapted to dry environments—they are xerophytes. As aforementioned, cacti live in arid or semi-arid habitats, and as such they are highly specialized to survive in such environments. They carry out photosynthesis in their stems, and the spines can be considered as modified leaves to protect them from thirsty animals. The long answer follows. We shall look into their unique adaptations or specializations. The descriptions will focus on the key species in TPSNR. They are the Coast prickly- pear (Opuntia littoralis), Coastal cholla (Cylindropuntia prolifera), the rare Coast barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens), and the introduced Indian fig (Opuntia ficus-indica). A few illustrations also make use of species from Anza-Borrego. Figure 1. Left: Coast barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) with prominent ribs; Right: A close up on the two different types of spines. (The smaller, finer white ones might have secretory glands at the base, but no confirmation of this yet.) 2 Figure 2. Coastal cholla (Cylindropuntia prolifera). Left: A young stem made of tubercles; Right: A grown, expanded stem with tubercle-like undulations. Cactus morphological features The cactus stem has many specialized features. For one, the stem has taken over the task of photosynthesis and this will be revisited below. Here, we look into the structural characteristics, and see how the stem is specialized for water conservation. Stem structure and shape: Without leaves, cacti are easily recognizable by their stems. The stems generally can be cylindrical or flattened. Formally, a modified stem that replaces the functional role of leaves is a cladode.1 Columnar cacti are the ones with a main cylindrical cladode that we commonly call chollas. One example is the Coastal cholla (Cylindropuntia prolifera). We refer flattened cladodes as pads. Two examples are the Coast prickly-pear (Opuntia littoralis), and Indian fig (Opuntia ficus-indica). All cacti take on some compact shape that may reduce the surface area. Here, the Coast barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) is probably the most specialized. Its globular (globe-like) shape has a very small surface area to volume ratio, and is ideal for water storage.2 Many cacti have ribs and tubercles, which are small Figure 3. The woody nodule-like projections. Ribs are most distinct with a barrel skeleton inside Buckhorn cholla (Cylindropuntia cactus (Fig. 1). These structures allow the cactus stem to acanthocarpa) in Anza- expand or contract depending on water content. The ribs in Borrego. 1 Another term that one may come across is phylloclade, a modified branch. For cactus, cladode is the proper term. There is another similar spelling term, phyllode, which is a modified petiole that resembles and functions as a leaf. This is what we find in acacia (genus Acacia in Fabaceae) plants. 3 particular make a folded surface that impart strength to the structure. The groves on a ribbed surface also help to channel rainfall to the roots. When the sun is at an angle, the ribs provide a partial shade. Some cacti, notably the barrel cacti (genus Ferocactus) are known to tilt slightly toward the sun, especially on a slope, such that only the smaller top faces direct sun. Cacti with flattened stems have neither distinctive ribs nor tubercles. A columnar cactus such as the Coastal cholla can have tubercle-like undulations (Fig. 2). The Coastal cholla is unusual; its young cladode is made of tubercles. As the stem grows, the tubercles swell and the bases stretch out to become tepee-like. This is also the growth pattern with pincushion cacti (genus Mammillaria). Unlike coconuts, we will not find liquid water. Cacti use water storage tissues, specialized thin-walled cells with a large water vacuole. The stem of a well hydrated Indian fig is close to 90% water. Some cacti can convert water into a mucilaginous substance that does not evaporate readily and lowers the freezing point of the tissue such that the cacti can survive cold winters. Figure 4. Two views of glochids and spines arising from areoles in Coast prickly-pear (Opuntia littoralis). To seal in moisture, cacti have thick, waxy cuticle on the surface. To reduce transpiration loss, cacti practically have no leaves (more on this with the spines below), and the stem takes over the photosynthesis function. Even though a cactus is mostly water, it is considered a woody plant. All cacti make a vascular cambium that produces both secondary (woody) xylem and secondary phloem.3 However, the xylem does not become heartwood—the plant uses the space for water storage tissue. The secondary xylem forms instead a hard fibrous matrix. This is most 2 Given a solid object, the sphere has the smallest surface area to volume ratio. 3 New, primary growth makes xylem that does not contain lignin, the substance of woody tissue. Subsequent growth of a stem laterally makes xylem that is lignified, and is referred to as secondary xylem, or as sapwood. 4 evident with a dead and partly decomposed cholla that exposes a cylindrical chain link fence-like woody skeleton (Fig. 3). Figure 5. Two cacti with dense spine clusters. Left: Velvet cactus (Bergerocactus emoryi) planted near the Lodge garden; Right: Teddy-bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Anza-Borrego. Areoles, spines and glochids: With cacti, we do not find recognizable branches. Instead, the plants bear areoles, structures unique to the Cactaceae family. An areole is a much reduced shoot (axillary bud4) that appears as either a little pad or even a slight depression or pit under dry conditions, but from which grows the spines, glochids, flowers, stems (cladodes), and stem arms on the saguaro in the Sonoran Desert.5 In short, the small oval thing at the base of the spines of a cactus is an areole (Fig. 4). Among things that grow from an areole, spines are the most evident, and they generally appear in clusters. We can say that spines are modified leaves.6 To be more precise, cactus spines are modified scales grown from an axillary bud (areole). As a young spine grows from a bud, it quickly turns into a dead lignified fiber.7 Sometimes, the spines are covered by a loose sheath formed from the dried epidermis. This is presumably common with the Cylindropuntia species, but this is not evident in the Coastal cholla. (But in Anza- Borrego, we can observe that with the Buckhorn cholla, Cylindropuntia acanthocarpa.) 4 Areole is from the French aréole, which is taken from the Latin, areola, the diminutive of area, referring to a small open space or garden. In green plants, an axillary bud is an embryonic shoot located on the upper edge at the base of a petiole.
Recommended publications
  • Cop15 Prop. 28
    CoP15 Prop. 28 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha (Qatar), 13-25 March 2010 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Delist Euphorbia misera from Appendix II. B. Proponent Mexico and the United States of America* C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliophyta 1.2 Order: Magnoliopsida 1.3 Family: Euphorbiaceae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: Euphorbia misera Benth. 1.5 Scientific synonyms: Euphorbia benedicta, Trichosterigma benedictum, T. miserum 1.6 Common names: English: cliff spurge, Saint Benedict spurge French: Spanish: hamácj, jumetón, lechosa, golondrina 1.7 Code numbers: 2. Overview Euphorbia misera, native to Mexico and the United States of America, has been listed in CITES Appendix II since 1975. According to CITES trade data, international trade does not appear to be a factor affecting the status of this species. We are proposing to delete this species from the CITES Appendices. Since listing, there has been minimal CITES-recorded international trade (1 shipment of 5 artificially propagated specimens from the United States in the 1990s). The species is intrinsically vulnerable to extinction due to its limited and fragmented distribution and low reproductive output. Euphorbia misera is used medicinally in Mexico, which use appears to be highly localized. The species is known in commercial cultivation in the United States, where there is domestic * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • CCCSS September 2010 Newsletter.Indd
    CENTRAL COAST CACTUS AND SUCCULENT SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Pismo Beach,CA93449 780 MercedSt. c/o MarkusMumper & SucculentSociety Central CoastCactus On the Dry Side September 2010 Inside this issue: CCCSS August Meeting Recap •Upcoming Speaker Gene Schroeder greeted about 100 members that showed up for our August meeting. He reminded everyone that our October - Nick Wilkinson meeting would be the 3rd Sunday of the month instead of the •Last Month’s 2nd so mark your calendars for the 17th. Our brag table had some very impressive plants which included a 1st prize “ Best - Meeting Minutes Echeveria” from the Paso Fair submitted by Tim Dawson. He won with his beautiful Echeveria subrigida. Rich Hart also showed us •Genus of the Month his awesome Brunsvigia josephinae. This South African bulb was in - Ferocactus flower that was almost 3 feet tall. He said this plant was 20 years - Adromischus old. He started it from seed and it finally bloomed after 17 years. Our raffle table keeps getting better and thanks to Mary Peracca and Gene Schroeder for donating some of their plants for the raffle table. Our team of Rob Skillen, Charles Spotts and Gene Schroeder all shared their specimens with us for the plants of the month: Thelocactus and Bromeliad. We are so fortunate to have these knowledgeable guys to be a part of our club. Also on that list is Nick Wilkinson who missed the meeting as he was selling at a show. We were honored to have Woody Minnich as our speaker this month from New Mexico. His presentation of Rio Grande Do Sol was informative with wonderful photos and a twist of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination of Two Species of Ferocactus: Interactions Between Cactus-Specialist Bees and Their Host Plants
    Functional Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. Ecology 2005 Pollination of two species of Ferocactus: interactions 19, 727–734 between cactus-specialist bees and their host plants M. E. MCINTOSH Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1041 E. Lowell Street; BioSciences West, Room 310, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Summary 1. Resolving the controversy over the prevalence of generalization in plant–pollinator interactions requires field studies characterizing the pollination effectiveness of all a plant’s floral visitors. Herein, the pollination effectiveness of all visitors to two species of barrel cactus (Ferocactus) was quantified. 2. Flowers of both species were pollinated almost exclusively by cactus-specialist bees: 99% (F. cylindraceus (Engelm.) Orcutt) and 94% (F. wislizeni (Engelm.) Britt. and Rose) of all seeds produced in this study resulted from cactus bee visits. 3. For F. cylindraceus, the cactus-specialist Diadasia rinconis was the most abundant visitor. For F. wislizeni, three cactus-specialists (including D. rinconis) plus generalists in the family Halictidae (which did not act as pollinators) each accounted for a quarter of all visits. 4. Diadasia rinconis visits to F. wislizeni flowers were more effective (per-visit) than visits by the other two cactus-specialists. 5. Pollen-collecting and nectar-collecting visits were equally effective. Nectar-collecting visits were the most abundant. 6. Apart from the non-pollinating halictids, floral visitors surprisingly did not include commonly co-occurring generalist bees. 7. These data suggest that, just as apparently specialized flowers may be visited by a diverse assemblage of generalists, so apparently generalized flowers may be visited predominantly by specialists, and that these specialists may perform virtually all of the pollination.
    [Show full text]
  • What Did the First Cacti Look Like
    What Did the First Cactus Look like? An Attempt to Reconcile the Morphological and Molecular Evidence Author(s): M. Patrick Griffith Source: Taxon, Vol. 53, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 493-499 Published by: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4135628 . Accessed: 03/12/2014 10:33 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Taxon. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 192.135.179.249 on Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:33:44 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TAXON 53 (2) ' May 2004: 493-499 Griffith * The first cactus What did the first cactus look like? An attempt to reconcile the morpholog- ical and molecular evidence M. Patrick Griffith Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 N. College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, U.S.A. michael.patrick. [email protected] THE EXTANT DIVERSITYOF CAC- EARLYHYPOTHESES ON CACTUS TUS FORM EVOLUTION Cacti have fascinated students of naturalhistory for To estimate evolutionaryrelationships many authors many millennia. Evidence exists for use of cacti as food, determinewhich morphological features are primitive or medicine, and ornamentalplants by peoples of the New ancestral versus advanced or derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 2006. Proceedings of the 9Th Western Black Bear Workshop, New Mexico
    Proceedings of the 9th Western Black Bear Workshop April 19-22, 2006 NRA Whittington Center, Raton, New Mexico Frederic (Rick) S. Winslow and Larisa L. Harding Editors www.beartrust.org SPONSORS: New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Philmont Scout Ranch Sandia Mountain Bear Watch United States Forest Service, Southwest Region Bear Trust 2 Suggested Citation: Author’s name(s). 2007. Paper title. Western Black Bear Workshop 9:____-____. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Wildlife Management Division #1 Wildlife Way Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87504 Information of how to order additional copies of this volume or other volumes in this series, as well as volumes of Ursus, the official publication of the International Association for Bear Research and Management, may be obtained from the IBA web site: www.bearbiology.com, from the IBA newsletter International Bear News, or from Terry D. White, University of Tennesee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, P. O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071, USA. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: The Table of Contents has been formatted to reflect the chronology of the Workshop program. Preface………………………………………………………………… # ORAL PRESENTATIONS Welcome: Joe Apache, Mayor, City of Raton; Bruce Thompson, Director, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish; Joanna Prukop, Cabinet Secretary for Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources for New Mexico; Don DeLorenzo, Director, Wildlife, Fish and Rare Plants, Southwestern Region, United States Forest Service. Panel Discussion: Black Bear Management in a Human Dominated Landscape. Panel Members; Bob Holder, Colorado Division of Wildlife Resources; Gerry Perry, Arizona Department of Game and Fish, Marv Jenson, Turner Enterprises;; Jan Hayes, Sandia Mountain Bear Watch.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus (Opuntia Spp.) As Forage 169
    Cactus (Opuntia spp.) as forage 169 Food •••A.gricultv,.. Org•nU.taon or United -N••lon• FAO Cactus (Opuntiaspp.) PLANT PRODUCTION as forage AND PROTECTlON PAPER 169 Ed~ed by Candelario Mondragon-Jacobo lnstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP) Mexico and Salvador Perez-Gonzalez Universidad Aut6noma de Queretaro Mexico Coordinated for FAD by Enrique Arias Horticultural Crops Group Stephen G. Reynolds Grassland and Pasture Crops Group FAO Plant Production and Protection Division and Manuel D. sanchez Feed Resources Group FAO Animal Production and HeaHh Division Produced within the frameworl< of the FAO International Technical Cooperation Networl< ot on Cactus Pear ••u nttttd• NaUon• Rome,2001 Reprinted 2002 The designations “developed” and “developing” economies are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country, country territory or area in the development process. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations or of their affiliated organization(s). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-104705-7 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural World That I Seek out in the Desert Regions of Baja California
    The natural world that I seek out in the desert regions of Baja California and southern California provides me with scientific adventure, excitement towards botany, respect for nature, and overall feelings of peace and purpose. Jon P. Rebman, Ph.D. has been the Mary and Dallas Clark Endowed Chair/Curator of Botany at the San Diego Natural History Museum (SDNHM) since 1996. He has a Ph.D. in Botany (plant taxonomy), M.S. in Biology (floristics) and B.S. in Biology. Dr. Rebman is a plant taxonomist and conducts extensive floristic research in Baja California and in San Diego and Imperial Counties. He has over 15 years of experience in the floristics of San Diego and Imperial Counties and 21 years experience studying the plants of the Baja California peninsula. He leads various field classes and botanical expeditions each year and is actively naming new plant species from our region. His primary research interests have centered on the systematics of the Cactus family in Baja California, especially the genera Cylindropuntia (chollas) and Opuntia (prickly-pears). However, Dr. Rebman also does a lot of general floristic research and he co- published the most recent edition of the Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County. He has over 22 years of field experience with surveying and documenting plants including rare and endangered species. As a field botanist, he is a very active collector of scientific specimens with his personal collections numbering over 22,500. Since 1996, he has been providing plant specimen identification/verification for various biological consulting companies on contracts dealing with plant inventory projects and environmental assessments throughout southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    SYSTEMATICS OF TRIBE TRICHOCEREEAE AND POPULATION GENETICS OF Haageocereus (CACTACEAE) By MÓNICA ARAKAKI MAKISHI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Mónica Arakaki Makishi 2 To my parents, Bunzo and Cristina, and to my sisters and brother. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to express my deepest appreciation to my advisors, Douglas Soltis and Pamela Soltis, for their consistent support, encouragement and generosity of time. I would also like to thank Norris Williams and Michael Miyamoto, members of my committee, for their guidance, good disposition and positive feedback. Special thanks go to Carlos Ostolaza and Fátima Cáceres, for sharing their knowledge on Peruvian Cactaceae, and for providing essential plant material, confirmation of identifications, and their detailed observations of cacti in the field. I am indebted to the many individuals that have directly or indirectly supported me during the fieldwork: Carlos Ostolaza, Fátima Cáceres, Asunción Cano, Blanca León, José Roque, María La Torre, Richard Aguilar, Nestor Cieza, Olivier Klopfenstein, Martha Vargas, Natalia Calderón, Freddy Peláez, Yammil Ramírez, Eric Rodríguez, Percy Sandoval, and Kenneth Young (Peru); Stephan Beck, Noemí Quispe, Lorena Rey, Rosa Meneses, Alejandro Apaza, Esther Valenzuela, Mónica Zeballos, Freddy Centeno, Alfredo Fuentes, and Ramiro Lopez (Bolivia); María E. Ramírez, Mélica Muñoz, and Raquel Pinto (Chile). I thank the curators and staff of the herbaria B, F, FLAS, LPB, MO, USM, U, TEX, UNSA and ZSS, who kindly loaned specimens or made information available through electronic means. Thanks to Carlos Ostolaza for providing seeds of Haageocereus tenuis, to Graham Charles for seeds of Blossfeldia sucrensis and Acanthocalycium spiniflorum, to Donald Henne for specimens of Haageocereus lanugispinus; and to Bernard Hauser and Kent Vliet for aid with microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Invasive Species in the Sonoran Desert Region
    3 Invasive Species in the Sonoran Desert Region 11 INVASIVE SPECIES IN THE SONORAN DESERT REGION Invasive species are altering the ecosystems of the Sonoran Desert Region. Native plants have been displaced resulting in radically different habitats and food for wildlife. Species like red brome and buffelgrass have become dense enough in many areas to carry fire in the late spring and early summer. Sonoran Desert plants such as saguaros, palo verdes and many others are not fire- adapted and do not survive these fires. The number of non-native species tends to be lowest in natural areas of the Sonoran Desert and highest in the most disturbed and degraded habitats. However, species that are unusually aggressive and well adapted do invade natural areas. In the mid 1900’s, there were approximately 146 non-native plant species (5.7% of the total flora) in the Sonoran Desert. Now non-natives comprise nearly 10% of the Sonoran Desert flora overall. In highly disturbed areas, the majority of species are frequently non-native invasives. These numbers continue to increase. It is crucial that we monitor, control, and eradicate invasive species that are already here. We must also consider the various vectors of dispersal for invasive species that have not yet arrived in Arizona, but are likely to be here in the near future. Early detection and reporting is vital to prevent the spread of existing invasives and keep other invasives from arriving and establishing. This is the premise of the INVADERS of the Sonoran Desert Region program at the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauromalus Hispidus
    ARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICOS Cerdá-Ardura & Langarica-Andonegui 2018 - Sauromalus hispidus in Rasa Island- p 17-28 ON THE PRESENCE OF THE SPINY CHUCKWALLA SAUROMALUS HISPIDUS (STEJNEGER, 1891) IN RASA ISLAND, MEXICO PRESENCIA DEL CHACHORÓN ESPINOSO SAUROMALUS HISPIDUS (STEJNEGER, 1891) EN LA ISLA DE RASA, MÉXICO Adrián Cerdá-Ardura1* and Esther Langarica-Andonegui2 1Lindblad Expeditions/National Geographic. 2Facultad de Ciencias, Uiversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México. *Correspondence author: [email protected] Abstract.— In 2006 and 2013 two different individuals of the Spiny Chuckwalla (Sauromalus hispidus) were found on the small, flat, volcanic and isolated Rasa Island, located in the Midriff Region of the Gulf of California, Mexico. This species had never been recorded from Rasa Island prior to 2006. A new field study in 2014 revealed the presence of a single female chuckwalla inhabiting the Tapete Verde Valley, in the south-central part of the island, occupying a territory no bigger than 10000 m2. A scat analysis shows that the only food consumed by the animal is the Alkali Weed (Cressa truxilliensis) that forms patches of carpets in its habitat. The individual is in precarious condition, as it seems to starve on a seasonal basis, especially during El Niño cycles; also, it is missing fingers and toes, which appear to be intentional markings by amputation. We conclude that the two individuals were introduced to the island intentionally by humans. Keywords.— Chuckwalla, Gulf of California, Rasa Island. Resumen.— En 2006 y 2013 se encontraron dos individuos diferentes del cachorón de roca o chuckwalla espinoso (Sauromalus hispidus) en la pequeña, plana, volcánica y aislada isla Rasa, localizada en la Región de las Grandes Islas, en el Golfo de California, México.
    [Show full text]