1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3 Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3 01000009 Fire, Aviation & Air 3 0100GNC Great Northern Crew R1 3 0100MTDC Missoula Tech and Development 3 01020000 Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest 4 01020001 Dillon Ranger District 4 01020002 Wise River Ranger District 4 01020003 Wisdom Ranger District 4 01020004 Butte Ranger District 4 01020006 Madison Ranger District 4 01020007 Jefferson Ranger District 4 01020008 Pintler Ranger District 3 01030000 Bitterroot National Forest 4 01030001 Stevensville Ranger District 4 01030002 Darby Ranger District 4 01030003 Sula Ranger District 4 01030004 West Fork Ranger District 4 010300AD Bitterroot NF ADs 4 0103HELI Bitterroot Helitack Crew 4 0103IHC2 Bitterroot IHC 3 01040000 Idaho Panhandle National Forests 4 01040001 Coeur d'Alene River Ranger District 5 0104IHC Idaho Panhandle IHC 4 01040004 St. Joe Ranger District 4 01040006 Sandpoint Ranger District 4 01040007 Bonners Ferry Ranger District 4 01040008 Priest Lake Ranger District 4 0104AD Idaho Panhandle AD Employee 4 0104HELI IPNF Helitack 3 01100000 Flathead National Forest 4 01100001 Swan Lake Ranger District 4 01100004 Spotted Bear Ranger District 4 01100006 Hungry Horse Ranger District 4 01100008 Tally Lake Ranger District 4 0110FIHC Flathead Hotshot Crew 4 0110HELI Flathead NF Helitack 3 01110000 Custer Gallatin National Forest 4 01110003 Gardiner Ranger District 4 01110004 Yellowstone Ranger District 4 01110006 Bozeman Ranger District 4 01110007 Hebgen Lake Ranger District 4 01110080 Custer Gallatin National Forest - Billin 4 01110082 Beartooth Ranger District 4 01110083 Sioux Ranger District 4 01110084 Ashland Ranger District 4 0111HRAP Custer Gallatin NF Helicopter Rappellers 4 0111SMKJ West Yellowstone Interangency Fire Cente 3 01120000 Helena National Forest 4 01120001 Townsend Ranger District Page Nbr: 1 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 05/21/19 04:04 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 01120002 Helena Ranger District 4 01120004 Lincoln Ranger District 4 0112CMH Central MT Helitack 4 0112IHC Helena Hotshots 3 01140000 Kootenai National Forest 4 01140001 Rexford Ranger District 4 01140003 Fortine Ranger District 4 01140004 Three Rivers Ranger District 4 01140005 Libby Ranger District 4 01140007 Cabinet Ranger District 3 01150000 Helena - Lewis and Clark National Fores 4 01150001 Rocky Mountain Ranger District 4 01150003 Belt Creek Office 4 01150004 Judith Office 4 01150006 Judith - Musselshell Ranger District 4 01150007 Belt Creek - White Sulphur Springs Range 4 01150011 Townsend Ranger District 4 01150012 Helena Ranger District 4 01150014 Lincoln Ranger District 4 011500GF Helena - Lewis and Clark NF - Great Fall 4 0115CMH Central MT Helitack 4 0115GFAD Great Falls AD 4 0115HAD Helena AD 4 0115HIHC Helena Hotshots 4 0115LIHC Lewis and Clark Hotshots 3 01160000 Lolo National Forest 4 01160003 Missoula Ranger District 5 0116SHOT Lolo Hotshots 4 01160004 Ninemile Ranger District 4 01160005 Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger Districts 4 01160006 Seeley Lake Ranger District 4 01160007 Superior Ranger District 4 011600AD Lolo AD's 4 0116HELI National & Forest Helicopter 3 01170000 Nez Perce National Forest 4 01170001 Salmon River Ranger District 4 01170004 Clearwater Ranger District 4 01170005 Red River Ranger District 4 01170006 Moose Creek Ranger District 4 01170052 Palouse Ranger District 4 01170053 North Fork Ranger District 4 01170055 Lochsa Ranger District 4 01170056 Powell Ranger District 4 011700AD Nez Perce-Clearwater NF AD Emp 4 0117HELI Forest HELITACK Prgm 4 0117SMKJ GAC Smokejumpers 3 01180000 Dakota Prairie Grasslands 4 01180001 Sheyenne Ranger District 4 01180006 Grand River District 4 01180007 Medora Ranger District Page Nbr: 2 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 05/21/19 04:04 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 01180008 Mckenzie Ranger District 3 01510007 Aviation And Fire Management 2 02000000 Rocky Mountain Region R2 3 02000005 State And Private Forestry 3 02020000 Bighorn National Forest 4 02020001 Powder River Ranger District 4 02020004 Medicine Wheel Ranger District 4 02020006 Tongue Ranger District 3 02030000 Black Hills National Forest 4 02030001 Bearlodge Ranger District 4 02030003 Hell Canyon Ranger District 4 02030004 Elk Mountain Ranger District 4 02030006 Harney Ranger District 4 02030008 Nemo Ranger District 4 02030009 Pactola Ranger District 4 0203SHOT Black Hills NF Tatanka Hotshots 3 02040000 Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre And Gunnison Nat 4 02040002 Grand Valley Ranger District 4 02040005 Norwood Ranger District 4 02040006 Ouray Ranger District 4 02040007 Gunnison Ranger District 4 02040008 Paonia Ranger District 4 02040009 Taylor Ranger District 3 02060000 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest 4 02060001 Yampa Ranger District 4 02060002 Brush Creek-Hayden Ranger District 4 02060003 Hahns Peak-Bears Ears Ranger District 4 02060004 Parks Ranger District 4 02060005 Laramie Ranger District 4 02060009 Douglas Ranger District 3 02070000 Nebraska National Forest 4 02070001 Bessey Ranger District 4 02070002 Pine Ridge Ranger District 4 02070005 Fall River Ranger District 4 02070006 Wall Ranger District 4 02070009 Fort Pierre National Grasslands 3 02090000 Rio Grande National Forest 4 02090001 Forest Supervisor 4 02090003 Conejos Peak Ranger District 4 02090004 Divide Ranger District 4 02090007 Saguache Ranger District 3 02100000 Arapaho And Roosevelt National Forests 4 02100001 Boulder Ranger District 4 02100005 Canyon Lakes Ranger District 4 02100006 Pawnee Ranger District # National Grassl 4 02100007 Clear Creek Ranger District 4 02100008 Sulphur Ranger District 3 02120000 Pike And San Isabel National Forests 4 02120001 Leadville Ranger District 4 02120002 Salida Ranger District Page Nbr: 3 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 05/21/19 04:04 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 02120003 San Carlos Ranger District 4 02120006 Comanche Ranger District (Comanche Natio 4 02120007 Cimarron Ranger District (Cimarron Natio 4 02120009 Pikes Peak Ranger District 4 02120010 South Park Ranger District 4 02120011 South Platte Ranger District 3 02130000 San Juan National Forest 4 02130005 Mancos/Dolores Ranger District 4 02130006 Pagosa Ranger District 4 02130008 Columbine Ranger District 4 0213HELI Durango Helitack 4 0213IHC San Juan Hotshots 3 02140000 Shoshone National Forest 4 02140001 Clarks Fork Ranger District 4 02140002 Greybull Ranger District 4 02140003 Washakie Ranger District 4 02140004 Wapiti Ranger District 4 02140005 Wind River Ranger District 3 02150000 White River National Forest 4 02150001 West Zone/Aspen Ranger District 4 02150002 West Zone/Blanco Ranger District 4 02150003 West Zone/Sopris Ranger District 4 02150004 Eagle Ranger District 4 02150007 East Zone/Holy Cross Ranger District 4 02150008 West Zone/Rifle Ranger District 4 02150010 East Zone/Dillon Ranger District 2 03000000 Southwestern Region R3 3 03010000 Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Fores 4 03010001 Alpine Ranger District 4 03010002 Black Mesa Ranger District 4 03010003 Clifton Ranger District 4 03010006 Springerville Ranger District 4 03010007 Lakeside Ranger District 3 03020000 Carson National Forest 4 03020001 Canjilon Ranger District 4 03020002 El Rito Ranger District 5 0302RITO El Rito Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cr 4 03020003 Jicarilla Ranger District 4 03020004 Camino Real Ranger District 5 0302PENA Penasco Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cr 5 0302TAOS Taos Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Crew 4 03020006 Tres Piedras Ranger District 4 03020007 Questa Ranger District 5 0302QUES Questa Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cre 4 0302IHC Carson Hotshots 3 03030000 Cibola National Forest 4 03030002 Mt. Taylor Ranger District 4 03030003 Magdalena Ranger District 4 03030004 Mountainair Ranger District 4 03030005 Sandia Ranger District Page Nbr: 4 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 05/21/19 04:04 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 03030006 Black Kettle National Grasslands 4 03030007 Kiowa/Rita Blanca National Grasslands 3 03040000 Coconino National Forest 4 03040006 Red Rock Ranger District 4 03040007 Mogollon Rim Ranger District 4 03040008 Flagstaff Ranger District 3 03050000 Coronado National Forest 4 03050001 Douglas Ranger District 4 03050002 Nogales Ranger District 4 03050003
Recommended publications
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804
    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
    [Show full text]
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Ecology of Mexican Spotted Owls in the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit, Arizona and New Mexico
    Status and Ecology of Mexican Spotted Owls in the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit, Arizona and New Mexico Joseph L. Ganey James P. Ward, Jr. David W. Willey United States Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Department Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-256WWW of Agriculture May 2011 Ganey, Joseph L.; Ward, James P. Jr.; Willey, David W. 2011. Status and ecology of Mexican spotted owls in the Upper Gila Mountains recovery unit, Arizona and New Mexico. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-256WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 94 p. Abstract This report summarizes current knowledge on the status and ecology of the Mexican spot- ted owl within the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit (UGM RU). It was written at the request of U.S. Forest Service personnel involved in the Four Forests Restoration Initia- tive (4FRI), a collaborative, landscape-scale restoration effort covering approximately 2.4 million ac (1 million ha) across all or part of four National Forests (Apache-Sitgreaves, Coconino, Kaibab, and Tonto National Forests) located within the UGM RU. The UGM RU supports >50% of the known population of Mexican spotted owls, and the central location of the UGM RU within the overall range of the owl appears to facilitate gene flow throughout that range. Consequently, the UGM population is viewed as important to stability within the overall range of the owl, and management that impacts owls within the UGM RU could affect owl populations beyond that RU. Keywords: abundance, demography, habitat selection, diet composition, movements Authors Joseph L.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLEGUIDELINES OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 12: CONTACT INFORMATION AND MAPS 12.1 ADOT CONTACT INFORMATION……………………………………………….......122 12.2 BLM CONTACT INFORMATION…………………………………………………......123 12.3 USFS CONTACT INFORMATION………………………………………………….....124 12.4 FHWA CONTACT INFORMATION…………………………………………………....130 12.5 GIS INFORMATION..............................................................................................131 12.6 MAPS...................................................................................................................132 121 12.1 ADOT CONTACT INFORMATION ADOT web link azdot.gov/ ADOT maps azdot.gov/maps General Information 602-712-7355 OFFICE ADOT DIRECTOR 602.712.7227 Deputy Director of Transportation 602.712.7391 Deputy Director of Policy 602.712.7550 Deputy Director of Business Operations 602.712.7228 Multimodal Planning Division (MPD) Director 602.712.7431 MPD Planning and Programming Director 602.712.8140 MPD Planning and Environmental Linkages Manager 602.712.4574 Infrastructure Delivery and Operations Division (IDO) 602.712.7391 State Engineer, Sr. Deputy State Engineer and Deputy State Engineer Offices 602.712.7391 DISTRICT ENGINEERS Northcentral azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northcentral 928.774.1491 Northeast azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northeast 928.524.5400 Central Construction District azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/central 602.712.8965 Central Maintenance District azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/central 602.712.6664 Northwest azdot.gov/business/district-contacts/northwest 928.777.5861
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0
    Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species June 2014 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... ii 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................................. 5-3 5.1 Wildlife.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1 Canada Lynx .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Wolverine ....................................................................................................... 5-43 5.2 Aquatics ................................................................................................................. 5-52 5.2.1 Existing Information ...................................................................................... 5-52 5.2.2 Informing the Assessment.............................................................................. 5-52 5.2.3 Literature Cited .............................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Rare Plants............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.3.1 Existing Information .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Forest & Grasslands, Dispersed Camping, Maximum
    This document may be freely republished or shared without permission, Page 1 of 12 as long as it remains unmodified. U.S. National Forests and Grasslands Maximum Limits Per Stay for Dispersed Camping Forest or Grassland State Length of Stay Official Rule Text Date Rule Established Source Chugach NF AK 14 days Camping, occupying, using, or leaving any personal items at any one area, June 12, 2020 https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd754185.pdf campground or site on Chugach National Forest System lands for more than 14 days, during any 30-day period. Any camp relocation within the 30-day period must be at a distance of at least 10 air miles from the previous campsite. Tongass NF AK 30 days No camping for more than 30 days during any 6-month period on National Forest 1994 https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprd3803286.pdf System lands. Bankhead NF AL 14 days Dispersed camping is permitted, but no rules have been published. Per phone call Per phone call with forest headquarters with National Forests in Alabama HQ, maximum camping limit is 14 days, after you vacate, you are expected to wait 24 hours before returning to the forest. Conecuh NF AL 14 days Dispersed camping is permitted, but no rules have been published. Per phone call Per phone call with forest headquarters with National Forests in Alabama HQ, maximum camping limit is 14 days, after you vacate, you are expected to wait 24 hours before returning to the forest. Talladega NF AL 14 days Dispersed camping is permitted, but no rules have been published.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forest Imagery Catalog Collection at the USDA
    National Forest Imagery Catalog collection at the USDA - Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) 2222 West 2300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84119-2020 (801) 844-2922 - Customer Service Section (801) 956-3653 - Fax (801) 956-3654 - TDD [email protected] http://www.apfo.usda.gov This catalog listing shows the various photographic coverages used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and archived at the Aerial Photography Field Office. This catalog references U.S. Forest Service (FS) and other agencies imagery. For imagery prior to 1955, please contact the National Archives & Records Administration: Cartographic & Architectural Reference (NWCS-Cartographic) Aerial Photographs Team http://www.archives.gov/research/order/maps.html#contact Coverage of U.S. Forest Service photography is listed alphabetically for each forest within a region. Numeric and alpha codes used to identify FS projects are determined by the Forest Service. The original film type for most of this imagery is a natural color negative. Line indexes are available for most projects. The number of index sheets required to cover a project area is shown on the listing. Please reference the remarks column, which may identify a larger or smaller project area than the National Forest area defined in the header. Offered in the catalog listing at each National Forest heading is a link to locate the Regional and National Forest office address and phone number at: http://www.fs.fed.us/intro/directory You may wish to visit the National Forest office to view the current imagery and have them assist you in identifying aerial imagery from the APFO.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln National Forest
    Chapter 1: Introduction In Ecological and Biological Diversity of National Forests in Region 3 Bruce Vander Lee, Ruth Smith, and Joanna Bate The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We summarized existing regional-scale biological and ecological assessment information from Arizona and New Mexico for use in the development of Forest Plans for the eleven National Forests in USDA Forest Service Region 3 (Region 3). Under the current Planning Rule, Forest Plans are to be strategic documents focusing on ecological, economic, and social sustainability. In addition, Region 3 has identified restoration of the functionality of fire-adapted systems as a central priority to address forest health issues. Assessments were selected for inclusion in this report based on (1) relevance to Forest Planning needs with emphasis on the need to address ecosystem diversity and ecological sustainability, (2) suitability to address restoration of Region 3’s major vegetation systems, and (3) suitability to address ecological conditions at regional scales. We identified five assessments that addressed the distribution and current condition of ecological and biological diversity within Region 3. We summarized each of these assessments to highlight important ecological resources that exist on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico: • Extent and distribution of potential natural vegetation types in Arizona and New Mexico • Distribution and condition of low-elevation grasslands in Arizona • Distribution of stream reaches with native fish occurrences in Arizona • Species richness and conservation status attributes for all species on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico • Identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation from Ecoregional Assessments from Arizona and New Mexico Analyses of available assessments were completed across all management jurisdictions for Arizona and New Mexico, providing a regional context to illustrate the biological and ecological importance of National Forests in Region 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography USDA Forest Service ● Alaska Region
    Biography USDA Forest Service ● Alaska Region WAYNE OWEN DIRECTOR, WILDLIFE, FISHERS, ECOLOGY, WATERSHED AND SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT Wayne Owen joined the Alaska Region in July 2010 as the Director of Wildlife, Fisheries, Ecology, Watersheds and Subsistence Management. As Director, he has the responsibility of providing for and integrating the management of the resources in his portfolio in collaboration with the Tongass and Chugach National Forests. He works closely with a wide range of stakeholders, partners and communities of interest to promote the sustainable management, conservation, restoration and stewardship of watersheds, fisheries, wildlife, botanical and subsistence resources. He also has a primary role in facilitating ecological data collection throughout the Alaska Region and leads several conservation and outdoor education initiatives. Owen previously served for eight years in the agency’s national headquarters in Washington, D.C., as the senior policy analyst for biodiversity issues for the National Forest System; National Botany Program Leader and liaison to the National Fish and Widlife Foundation. Prior to working in Washington, Owen was the Regional Ecologist for the Forest Service Southeastern Region in Atlanta, Georgia. He has worked on national forests in the South and Intermountain West and served as a technical specialist for the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. His first Forest Service job was doing radio-telemetry studies with the Pacific Southwest Research Station in central California. Owen has been acknowledged for his contribution to several national planning efforts. He received national recognition from the Chief of the Forest Service and Director of the Bureau of Land Management in 2004 for his efforts on behalf of conservation education and partnership programs.
    [Show full text]