ANDREW WITTY the Acceptable Face of Big Pharma?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Glaxosmithkline Bangladesh Limited (GSK)
GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited (GSK) Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation nd Date of Submission: 2 September, 2014 ©Daffodil International University DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Internship Report On Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation Submitted To Dr. Zakir Hossain Dean& Professor Faculty of Business & Economics Daffodil International University Submitted By Ishrat Jahan ID: 131-14-1019 Masters of Business Administration Daffodil International University Date of Submission: 2nd September, 2014 ©Daffodil International University Letter of Transmittal September 2, 2014 To Dr. Zakir Hossain Dean & Professor Faculty of Business and Economics Daffodil International University Dhaka-1205 Subject: Submission of internship report on recruitment and selection process: An evaluation of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited Sir, I am highly satisfied to submit my report on recruitment and selection process: an evaluation of GSK. For preparing this report I tried my best to accumulate relevant and upgraded information from available sources. In preparing this report, I tried my level best to make it a complete one and sincerely look forward to any possible correction. I am very glad because you also given the opportunity to prepare this report .I hope that this report will meet the standards of your judgments. Your Sincerely ---------------- Ishrat Jahan ©Daffodil International University i Certificate of the Supervisor This is to certify that the internship report titled ―Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation‖, has been prepared by Ms. Ishrat Jahan bearing ID: 131-14-1019 under my supervision, a practical study on GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited. I think on the basic of declaration Ms. -
Big Pharma Takes It
A Public Eye Report – March 2021 Big Pharma takes it all How pharmaceutical corporations profiteer from their privileges – even in a global health crisis like COVID-19 1 COVID-19, SHOWCASE OF A PERVERTED BUSINESS MODEL 3 2 BIG PHARMA’S 10 STRATEGIES FOR CASHING IN 7 2.1 – Determine R & D priorities by potential profits alone 9 2.2 – Abuse patents to lock up knowledge, inflate prices and limit supply 10 2.3 – Direct the system towards the needs of high-income countries 13 2.4 – Avoid public accountability 16 2.5 – Design clinical trials for self-interest 18 2.6 – Socialise risks, privatise profits 20 2.7 – Embrace public investment, reject public returns 22 2.8 – Impose unjustifiable, unchallengeable prices 24 2.9 – Financialise innovation 29 2.10 – Lobby pervasively 31 3 SWITZERLAND IS ‘PHARMALAND’ 33 4 CONCLUSION: WHAT COVID-19 SHOWS US 37 5 TIME TO ACT: OUR DEMANDS 39 Endnotes 42 IMPRINT Big Pharma takes it all: How pharmaceutical corporations profiteer from their privileges – even in a global health crisis like COVID-19. A Public Eye Report, March 2021, 52 pages. | Authors Patrick Durisch, Gabriela Hertig | Contributors Christa Luginbühl, Oliver Classen | Edition Mary Louise Rapaud | Publishers Romeo Regenass, Ariane Bahri | Layout Karin Hutter, karinhutter.com | Icons opak.cc | Cover picture © Tang Ming Tung/Getty Images PUBLIC EYE Dienerstrasse 12, Postfach, CH-8021 Zurich | +41 (0)44 2 777 999 | [email protected] Avenue Charles-Dickens 4, CH-1006 Lausanne | +41 (0)21 620 03 03 | [email protected] Donations IBAN CH64 0900 0000 1001 0813 5, Public Eye | publiceye.ch 1 ��-19, showcase of a perverted business model Monty Rakusen/Keystone © 4 BIG PHARMA TAKES IT ALL “No one is safe until everybody is safe”, “leave no one behind” are mantras that have been oft repeated by state leaders and the World Health Organization (WHO) since the coronavirus pandemic turned our world upside down in spring, 2020. -
Gilead and Glaxo's HIV Battle Intensifies
February 14, 2017 Gilead and Glaxo’s HIV battle intensifies Madeleine Armstrong The first phase II data with Gilead’s HIV integrase inhibitor bictegravir have set up a showdown with Glaxosmithkline/Viiv Healthcare’s marketed product dolutegravir. But Glaxo is already one step ahead with data from a two-drug combo that could reduce the side-effect burden for HIV patients. Glaxo believes that this doublet could “reshape the whole game”, the group's chief executive, Andrew Witty, said on its fourth-quarter earnings call. HIV has been one of the group’s main drivers in recent quarters as it has taken market share from Gilead, which is becoming increasingly reliant on HIV as its hepatitis C franchise slows (see tables below). Bictegravir vs dolutegravir The phase II study, presented today at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Seattle, compared bictegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide – known as FTC/TAF – with dolutegravir plus FTC/TAF in 98 treatment-naive, HIV-infected adults. Both are the latest iterations of the integrase inhibitor class, and unlike older products with the same mechanism do not require boosting – taking another drug to raise circulating levels – so have a lower risk of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. The phase II trial found similar response rates with a bictegravir-containing regimen versus a dolutegravir- containing therapy, which should boost confidence in Gilead’s compound ahead of phase III readouts expected mid-year. It found a 97% response in the bictegravir arm at 24 and 48 weeks, versus 94% at week 24 and 91% at week 48 in the dolutegravir arm, but the difference was not statistically significant. -
Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get Increasing Scrutiny from Prosecutors
REGULATORY UPDATE REGULATORY UPDATE CONSUMER DRUGS Pediatric Rare Disease Voucher Japan Wants EMA To Stay In Digital Marketing: Health Care Brands’ Program Faces Expiration, p. 12 UK Post-Brexit, p. 15 Window Into Consumers’ Lives, p. 20 Pharma intelligence Pinkpink.pharmamedtechbi.comSheetVol. 78 / No. 38 September 19, 2016 informa Mylan NV was subpoenaed for material Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get about the pricing of its generic doxycycline and communications with competitors. And Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. is Increasing Scrutiny From Prosecutors facing several probes about its pricing and BRENDA SANDBURG [email protected] patient assistance programs (see chart, p. 5). Mylan’s doxycycline price increases were called out by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., in October 2014 when they sent letters to 14 generic drug makers about the pricing of their prod- ucts. They noted that from October 2013 to April 2014, the average price charged for a 500-count bottle of 100 mg tablets had risen from $20 to $1,829, an 8,281% increase. Mylan is now under fire for repeatedly rais- ing the price of its severe allergy treatment EpiPen (epinephrine), which has increased from about $100 for a two-pack in 2008 to more than $600. Members of Congress sent a flurry of letters to the company requesting an explanation for the price hikes. And on Sept. 6, New York Attorney Gen- Shutterstock: blvdone Shutterstock: eral Eric Schneiderman announced that his office has begun an investigation into rug makers have been unable to programs, contractual agreements with Mylan with regard to EpiPen, saying a pre- shake free of government inves- pharmacy benefit managers, support of liminary review revealed that Mylan may Dtigations of their marketing and non-profit organizations, and calculation have inserted potentially anticompetitive sales practices. -
General Assembly Distr
UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/11/12/Add.2 5 May 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eleventh session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health, Paul Hunt* Annex MISSION TO GLAXOSMITHKLINE** * The present report was submitted late in order to incorporate the most recent information. Paul Hunt ended his mandate as Special Rapporteur on 31 July 2008. His report is circulated as an addendum to the report of his successor, Anand Grover, who took up the mandate on 1 August 2008. ** The summary of the present report is circulated in all official languages. The report itself, annexed to the summary, is circulated as received, in the language of submission only. GE.09-13131 (E) 130509 A/HRC/11/12/Add.2 page 2 Summary The Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health visited the headquarters of GlaxoSmithKline, one of the world’s leading research-based pharmaceutical companies, in June 2008 for substantive interviews with the company’s senior management. In the Special Rapporteur’s previous reports, he examined States’ responsibilities in relation to access to medicines. However, enhancing access to medicines is a shared responsibility. The Millennium Development Goals recognize that pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to improve access to medicines. In the present report, the Special Rapporteur outlines the responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies, including innovator, generic and biotechnology companies, with regard to the right to health in relation to access to medicines. -
In This Section
Strategic report In this section Chairman’s statement 2 CEO’s review 4 Business overview 6 The global context 8 Our business model 12 Our strategic priorities 14 How we performed 16 Risk management 18 Grow 20 Deliver 32 Simplify 44 Our financial architecture 48 Responsible business 50 Financial review 58 Strategic report Chairman’s statement Chairman’s statement To shareholders The value of the significant changes that have been made in recent years is evidenced in our performance this year “ Since Sir Andrew became It is clear from the following pages that Through the Audit & Risk Committee, we the Group made good progress against oversee the issues and challenges faced by CEO, the company has its strategy in 2013. management, and encourage the creation of an environment in which GSK can achieve The Board believes the business is seeing returned £30 billion its strategic ambitions in a responsible and the benefits of the significant changes the sustainable manner. to shareholders.” management team has driven over recent years to deliver sustainable growth, reduce risk and I have no doubt that commercial success is enhance returns to shareholders. directly linked to operating in a responsible way and which meets the changing expectations of The notably strong performance from the society. In this respect, the company continues R&D organisation in 2013 – with six major to adopt industry-leading positions on a range new product approvals in areas including of issues. respiratory disease, HIV and cancer – is critical to the longer-term prospects of the The announcement of plans during 2013 to Group. -
The Pharma Barons: Corporate Law's Dangerous New Race to the Bottom in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1 2018 The Pharma Barons: Corporate Law's Dangerous New Race to the Bottom in the Pharmaceutical Industry Eugene McCarthy University of Illinois Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mbelr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Eugene McCarthy, The Pharma Barons: Corporate Law's Dangerous New Race to the Bottom in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 8 MICH. BUS. & ENTREPRENEURIAL L. REV. 29 (2018). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mbelr/vol8/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PHARMA BARONS: CORPORATE LAW’S DANGEROUS NEW RACE TO THE BOTTOM IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY Eugene McCarthy* INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 29 I. THE RACE TO THE BOTTOM AND THE RISE OF THE ROBBER BARONS ..................................................................................... 32 A. Revising the Corporate Codes............................................ 32 B. The Emergence of Nineteenth-Century Lobbying ............. 37 C. The Robber -
JEMH Vol4 No1 Sept
ARTICLE SPECIAL THEME ISSUE ARTICLE Privatization of Knowledge and the Creation of Biomedical Conflicts of Interest Leemon B. McHenry Department of Philosophy, California State University, Northridge Jon N. Jureidini Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, South Australia rather than to what is meaningful, so that fi ndings that are Abstract likely to be clinical and meaningful are rejected because they fail to reach statistical signifi cance whereas others that appear Scientifi c and ethical misconduct have increased at an clinically trivial are accepted (Ziliak and McCloskey, 2007). Th e alarming rate as a result of the privatization of knowledge. disenchantment with the psychoanalytic paradigm of psychiatry What began as an eff ort to stimulate entrepreneurship led to a massive investment in psychopharmacology and other and increase discovery in biomedical research by physical interventions. A concession now to the limited benefi t strengthening the ties between industry and academics that psychopharmacology off ers would come at great cost to the has led to an erosion of confi dence in the reporting of profession. A vested interest in protecting the new paradigm of research results. Inherent tensions between profi t-directed neurological models of psychiatric disorders reaches beyond the inquiry and knowledge-directed inquiry are instantiated quest for a secure scientifi c foundation. in psychopharmacology, especially in the co-option of academic activity to corporate objectives. The eff ects of To the vulnerability created by personal bias and questionable these tensions are visible in research agendas, publication methodology we must add the dangers of pervasive fi nancial practices, postgraduate education, academic-industry confl icts of interest, of which we investigate the root cause in this partnerships and product promotion. -
Cusip No. G8807B106 13 D/A2 Page 2 of 7
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 13D Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 2)* THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA, INC. (Name of Issuer) Ordinary Shares (Title of Class of Securities) G8807B106 (CUSIP Number) Victoria A. Whyte GlaxoSmithKline plc 980 Great West Road Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS England Telephone: +44 (0)208 047 5000 (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications) December 31, 2016 (Date of Event which Requires Filing of this Statement) If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of §§240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box. ☐ Note: Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits. See §240.13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent. * The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person's initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter disclosures provided in a prior cover page. The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act. -
Pharmaceutical Price Regulation
Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Public Perceptions, Economic Realities, and Empirical Evidence John A. Vernon and Joseph H. Golec The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Vernon, John A. Pharmaceutical price regulation : public perceptions, economic realities, and empirical evidence / John A. Vernon and Joseph H. Golec. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4277-9 ISBN-10: 0-8447-4277-5 1. Pharmaceutical industry—Government policy—United States. 2. Drugs—Prices—Law and legislation—United States. I. Golec, Joseph. II. Title. HD9666.6.V47 2008 338.4'361510973--dc22 2008049681 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 © 2008 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii INTRODUCTION 1 1. -
Annual Report 2008 Find out More About GSK Online…
Do more, feel better, live longer Grow Deliver Simplify Annual Report 2008 Find out more about GSK online… www.gsk.com Website GlaxoSmithKline’s website www.gsk.com gives additional information on the Group. Information made available on the website does not constitute part of this Annual Report. Notice regarding limitations on Director liability under English Law Under the UK Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the liability of Directors in respect of statements in and omissions from the Report of the Directors contained on pages 12 to 98. Under English law the Directors would be liable to the company (but not to any third party) if the Report of the Directors contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, but would not otherwise be liable. Report of the Directors Pages 12 to 98 inclusive consist of a Report of the Directors that has been drawn up and presented in accordance with and in reliance upon English company law and the liabilities of the Directors in connection with that report shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by such law. Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements The Group’s reports filed with or furnished to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including this document and written information released, or oral statements made, to the public in the future by or on behalf of the Group, may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give the Group’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. A shareholder can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. -
GCE a Level 1083/01 BUSINESS STUDIES –
GCE A level 1083/01 S15-1083-01 BUSINESS STUDIES – BS3 A.M. WEDNESDAY, 10 June 2015 2 hours 1083 010001 ADDITIONAL MATERIALS In addition to this examination paper, you will need: • a calculator; • a 12 page answer book. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Use black ink or black ball-point pen. Answer all the questions. Write your answers in the separate answer book provided. INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES The number of marks is given in brackets at the end of each question. You are reminded that assessment will take into account the quality of written communication used in answers that involve extended writing in questions 4 and 5. You are reminded that questions 4 and 5 are synoptic and so will test understanding of the connections between different elements of the subject. © WJEC CBAC Ltd. AM*(S15-1083-01) 2 Study the information provided about GlaxoSmithKline plc and answer the questions that follow. BACKGROUND GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) is a science-led global healthcare company that researches and develops a broad range of innovative medicines and brands. It has three primary areas of business: pharmaceuticals, vaccines and consumer healthcare. Its consumer products include 5 Ribena, Macleans toothpaste, Panadol headache pills, Lucozade and Horlicks. The company can trace its history back to 1715 when Sylvanus Bevan established his pharmacy in Plough Court in London. In 1880, his descendants founded Burroughs Wellcome and Company which, eventually in 1995, merged with the Australian company Glaxo to form Glaxo Wellcome. The American branch of the business can trace its history back to 1830 when John K Smith 10 opened his first drugstore.