STANYTSIA LUHANSKA CITY PROFILE 2019

GOOD GOVERNANCE Stanytsia Feeling that 15 cities* authorities represent Luhanska citizens’ concerns Believing that and views, equally TRUST IN MAYOR OR 3.4 authorities are care about all parts HEAD OF THE TOWN and can be held 2.6 2.2 of and are accountable ready to listen 3.7 ACCOUNTABILITY UKRAINIAN TRUST IN POLICE OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES CARE OVERALL TRUST IN TOWN 3.9 LEVEL OF ADMINISTRATION PERCEIVED LEVEL OF CORRUPTION AMONG… CORRUPTION

TRUST IN UKRAINIAN 4.8 ARMY 6.3 0 2 4 6 8 10 7.6 7.1 6.9 6.7 6.9 Prioritize anti-corruption and transparency initiatives 4.1 across the low enforcement and justice system. JUDGES / PARLIAMENTA- DOCTORS POLICE LOCAL Increase trust towards police by promoting initiatives PROSECUTORS RIANS AUTHORITIES that increase police’s responsiveness to communal fears as well as communication between police and citizens.

COMMUNITY BONDS & VALUES

Stanytsia 15 cities* Luhanska CONFIDENCE THAT PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT GROUPS WILL LISTEN SOCIAL THREAT Feeling that different socio-demographic groups (i.e. IDPs, 3.3 2.9 people from western and eastern Ukraine, pro-EU etc.) PEOPLE FROM 7.2 may undermine the unity of their community EASTERN UKRAINE

SOCIAL THREAT TOWARDS IDPS IDPS 6.5 Feeling that IDPs may undermine the unity of their community PRO-EU 6.4 ORIENTED PEOPLE

PEOPLE LIVING 6.2 IN THE NGCA

PEOPLE FROM 5.9 WESTERN UKRAINE

PRO-RUSSIA 5.7 ORIENTED PEOPLE

ATO/JFO MILITARY 5.7 PERSONNEL

0 2 4 6 8 10

Considering the higher social threat towards and lower contact with IDPs in Stanytsia Luhanska, IDP integration programmes should be prioritised. Promote positive examples where IDPs contribute to the community enriching the local economy and culture.

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, , Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, , , Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, , Melitopol, Berdyansk. Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities LOCALITY SATISFACTION SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE (in terms of jobs, leisure activities 4.1 5.8 and raising children) Stanytsia 15 cities* Luhanska PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES

ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY WELFARE PAYMENTS 7.1

BASIC SCHOOLING 6.4

UTILITIES 5.8

ADMINISTRATIVE 5.4 SERVICES

QUALITY OF PUBLIC 4.8 TRANSPORT

HEALTH CARE 4.6

JUSTICE SERVICES 4.4

QUALITY OF ROADS 3.1

HIGHER EDUCATION 2.6

0 2 4 6 8 10 88 % of respondents are dissatisfied with the road networks, The city has one of the highest levels of environmental security while 58 % think the public transport is inefficient. from studied cities following Starobilsk and Berdiansk. However, 68 % of citizens are concerned about environmental risks and nearly Improve provision of public services, concentrating 80 % of are not happy with the air they breathe. on quality of roads and public transport, which would help increase the accessibility of other services such as PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY health care and education. To what extent are you proud of the following in you locality?

NATURE 7.8 PRIDE IN LOCALITY (OVERALL) 5.9 6.2

FAMOUS PEOPLE 7.4 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR CUISINE 7.2

To change 45 % ACTIVE TRADITIONS 7.2 things in your Willing to use political and social means community you of action without violence are... CULTURAL HERITAGE 7.0 2 % VIOLENT Willing to use violence

HOSPITALITY 6.3 53 % PASSIVE Not willing to do anything CREATIVITY 5.9 To motivate passive citizens, concentrate on COMMUNITY BONDS 5.3 small scale civic initiatives relevant to their sense of pride (i.e. local famous people, nature, SAFETY 3.1 traditions, cuisine) that bring immediate benefit INDUSTRY AND 2.1 to the community. PRODUCTION

0 2 4 6 8 10

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city).

City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for Eastern Ukraine 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org