The Relationship of Philosophy, Theology and Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Relationship of Philosophy, Theology and Science The Relationship of Philosophy, Theology and Science This chapter is structured by a historical survey of grand philosophical programs. Each philosophical program will be expounded enough to identify relationships to theology and science, and to provide a sample of each. More could be said about each philosophy, theology, and science contribution, which if the reader’s interest is peaked, I encourage following where the notes lead. One of the purposes of this paper is to show how philosophy changes theology and science with which it syncretizes. This will provide an opportunity to affirm aspects and to critique other aspects of the philosophies expounded. In the previous chapter I identified briefly my epistemic and theological method. This chapter provides a philosophical rationale for this previous sketched summary. If I provide a critique in this chapter as we travel through each philosophy (such as under Kant) then any following philosophies, theology and science that depend upon such a perspective are also critiqued without further raising the point repetitively. 13 This survey includes: 1) Stoicism-Tertullian, 2) Plato-Augustine, 3) Aristotle- Aquinas, 4) Renaissance Humanism-Calvin and the Biblical theology movement, 5) Descartes-Rationalists, 6) Locke and Newton-Edwards and Common Sense Realism, with Intelligent Design 7) Kant-Strauss, Ritschl and Crockett, 8) Romanticism-Evolution, Pietism of Schleiermacher and Evangelicalism, 9) Existentialism of Kierkegaard-Barth, Bultmann and Tillich, 10) Marx-Liberation theology, 11) Pragmatisms-Liberation, Evangelicalism, Relativity, and Quantum, 12) Process philosophy of Whitehead and Teilhard de Chardin, 13) Postmodern language games with traditional Christian communities and their theological hermeneutic, and 14) Critical Realism of Shedd, McGrath, Murphy, and Lakatos. I embrace a hybrid view of critical realism in a Lakatos’ scientific method. Throughout this survey, I will summarize some of the ways in which philosophy has affected theology and science, and highlight some of how it is affecting evangelical theology now. In the midst of this survey I will assess each view for warrant in a few of its core beliefs. This will provide us with the opportunity to evaluate whether these affects are appropriate and desirable. I argue for philosophy’s role in theology to be streamlined to: 1) helping us be precise and coherent in our thought (as a critical realist), within a Renaissance humanism program of “back to the Christian textual roots” which Biblical theology largely provides, 2) helping us think through ramifications of our commitments and the relationships this identifies us with, and 3) providing any additional basic beliefs that are strongly warranted, but do not counter those of Biblical theology. 1 This chapter is not addressing 1 What I have in mind is “A Personal Statement,” and chapter on “Faith and Knowledge,” in Doug Kennard, The Relationship Between Epistemology, Hermeneutics, Biblical Theology and Contextualization (Lewiston: The Mellon Press, 1999), pp. 31–33 and 35–69. 14 the value or limitations of philosophy as a discipline itself; I leave that issue for others at another occasion. Stoicism By the time Christianity arrived, Stoicism had entered its ethical phase and was one of the few highly moral options available in the Roman Empire, along with Judaism and Christianity. When Paul presented the gospel to some stoic philosophers, he resisted the Stoic cyclical metaphysic with its internal idealistic creation and cataclysm, 2 and presented a sovereign personal God, Who creates and draws all history out in a linear arrangement, ultimately heading to judgment and bodily resurrection (Acts 17:18–31). 3 Such a linear view of history is dependant upon the Jewish construct of creation unto Kingdom or more microscopically: exodus to Promised Land as a stage on the way to Kingdom (Ex. 1–19; Deut. 1–4). 4 However, in a positive direction Christianity utilized Stoic concepts to provide some basic connections in making sense of the concept of the Trinity, as when Tertullian appropriated the concept of procession from the Stoic belief system to help Christianity make sense of the Trinity. The stoic concept of procession meant “an extension” as in 2 Seneca, Nat. quaest . 3.29 in Seneca, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. LCL. trans. R. M. Gummere (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1947) 24.4–7; 98.12–14; Silius Italicus, Punica LLC, Trans. J. D. Duff (Cambridge: Harvard, University Press, 1949) 6.531–38; Tacitus, Annals LLC. Trans. J. Jackson (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951); Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Philosophers (Philosophoi Biol ) 8.134; Plutarch , Moral. 1077d. 3 Friedrich Lang, s.v. “ pu`r ,” TDNT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968) 6:928–945, claims that such stoic ideas are fused with apocalyptic Jewish cataclysm to fund 2 Peter 3: 7–10, however I think that there is ample source material in the Jewish heritage of the prophets and apocalypses without folding in a philosophical source no where mentioned in the text. Cf. Richard Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter (Waco: Word, 1983), pp. 300–1; 1QH 3.193b; Sib. Or. 2.187–213; 3.71–92; 4.171–182; 6.153–161; 1 Enoch 10.3; Hermas, Vis. 4.3.3. Jewish-Christian apocalyptic continued to be rich in descriptions of cataclysm without dependence upon stoicism, e.g., Apocalypse of Peter. 4 Thomas Cahill, The Gifts of the Jews (New York: Doubleday, 1998), pp. 18–19, 125–131, nicely summarizes the invention of linear history in a context in which all other peoples of the ancient Near East held to cyclical views. 15 the economic Divine Being extends Himself from the dominant expression of Father to a second and third persona of the Son and Holy Spirit. 5 This connection did not impose the Stoic concept of logos or spirit as a divine impersonal grand metaphysical principle, for Christianity’s God concept involved three persons within it. However, the fact that such concepts as logos and spirit were already seen in Stoicism as “divine” encouraged using other stoic concepts for describing the Christian’s Trinitarian God. Furthermore, the clarity of the revelational “Word” as Christ, resisted being interpreted in a non- personal Stoic manner within the church. So on the whole, the early church comes out strongly against embracing a Stoic world view, 6 even though a few Stoic concepts contributed to Christian theology. Stoicism with its idealistic world view resisted the value and development of science. Stoic metaphysics focused on the unseen ultimate, like the fire within everything as a non-personal divine principle that constituted all reality, which would eventually consume all reality in a cataclysm. This distracted the stoics from the available advances in science such as Pythagoras’ mathematical analysis of a spherical earth and Egyptian astronomy, because they did not value the constituents of the universe. Instead, they urged a morality to remain steady within divine determinism. Platonism Plato is a major influence on Western Christian ideas, especially due to a neo- Platonic version of his metaphysic, the theory of forms, and the simplicity of the Good. 5 Tertullian, Adv. Prax. 4, 5, 7, 8, 11; Against Praxeas. In The Writings of Quintus Sept. Flor. Tertullianus. Edited by Richard Ellmann. (Kila: Kessinger, 1869–70). 6 E.g., Origen, Contra Celsus 4.11-13 in Origen Against Celsus. Edited by James Bellamy (London: B. Mills, 1660); Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. 1.7.1 in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, ed. A. Roberts and J. Donaldson vol. 3 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,1995). 16 For example, one does not find in the real world a perfect circle, so Platonism conjectures that there is a realm of the forms which would house these perfect objects. Thus, pure geometrical and mathematical concepts occupy this realm of the forms, which Augustine located for Christianity as in the mind of God. 7 This grounding of geometry and mathematical concepts is the only way in which I can be said to be Platonic. More extensively, Plato thus provides meaning to the shadows which we see and feel about us in the real world. This level of Platonism is nicely pictured by Plato’s myth of the cave. 8 The forms are that which is really true for Plato, in that they are: eternal, unchanging, unmoving and indivisible. These forms introduce into all fields a dualism in which the higher realm associated with the forms is the true reality experienced through the lower realm of visible things and the discursive reasoning by which one conjures up the unchanging and indivisible truth of the forms. For Plato, the realm of the forms is only accessible to humans because they have trafficked among the realm of the forms as souls before we were incarnated into our bodies. 9 This pre-embodiement experience funds the Socratic method, so that everybody (even children and slaves) could recollect the truth of the forms with well placed questions to help them recollect this pre- embodiement experience of their souls. 7 In this I follow Roger Penrose, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (London: Vintage, 1995). As a theologian, Alister McGrath (in A Scientific Theology: Reality , Volume 2 [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002], pp. 79–83, 170–176) concurs with this assessment and locates this mathematical realism in the mind of God following Augustine. cf. Per Lindstrom “Quasi-realism in Mathematics,” The Monist 83 (2000): 122–47, but especially p. 130–132, and p. 138 where he discusses the objective reality of numbers and proposes options including Platonism and Dummett’s alternative of a Wittgenstein defined language game that has an intuitional essence beyond the definition, that perhaps accesses real mathematical objects like Putnam proposed. 8 Plato, The Republic , book 6, sections 509–11 in Great Books of the Western World, #7 Plato (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952), pp.
Recommended publications
  • The Trichotomy of Processes: a Philosophical Basis for Information Systems
    Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Americas Conference on Information Systems AMCIS 2003 Proceedings (AMCIS) December 2003 The rT ichotomy of Processes: A Philosophical Basis for Information Systems George Widmeyer University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2003 Recommended Citation Widmeyer, George, "The rT ichotomy of Processes: A Philosophical Basis for Information Systems" (2003). AMCIS 2003 Proceedings. 362. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2003/362 This material is brought to you by the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in AMCIS 2003 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TRICHOTOMY OF PROCESSES: A PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS George R. Widmeyer University of Michigan [email protected] Abstract The principle of trichotomy from the American philosopher Charles S. Peirce can be used to categorize processes into the triad of transactional, informational, and relational. The usefulness of these categories is explicated by a comparison with structuration theory and control theory, and elaborated with a consideration of democracy in a knowledge economy. These three example applications of the process triad show the generality of the conceptual categories and provide a natural way of bringing ideas from social and ethical theories into information systems design. Modeling the world and understanding business applications through the use of the Trichotomy of Processes should facilitate the development of more valuable information systems. Keywords: Business processes, information systems theory, conceptual modeling, ontology, Peirce, open society Introduction Various frameworks for understanding the business processes of an organization have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant on Recognizing Our Duties As God's Commands
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Asbury Theological Seminary Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 17 Issue 4 Article 3 10-1-2000 Kant on Recognizing our Duties as God's Commands John Hare Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Hare, John (2000) "Kant on Recognizing our Duties as God's Commands," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 17 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol17/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. KANT ON RECOGNIZING OUR DUTIES AS GOD'S COMMANDS John E. Hare Kant both says that we should recognize our duties as God's commands, and objects to the theological version of heteronomy, 'which derives morality from a divine and supremely perfect will'. In this paper I discuss how these two views fit together, and in the process I develop a notion of autonomous submission to divine moral authority. I oppose the 'constitutive' view of autonomy proposed by J. B. Schneewind and Christine Korsgaard. I locate Kant's objection to theological heteronomy against the background of Crusius's divine command theory, and I compare Kant's views about divine authority and human political authority. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2020; 1(3): 307–312
    Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2020; 1(3): 307–312 Book Review Huaping Lu-Adler. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. Reviewed by Stephen Palmquist, Department of Religion & Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, E-mail: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2020-0021 Notwithstanding its title, this book is not about the science called “logic”—at least, not insofar as “science of logic” refers to the rules, procedures, and guiding principles that constitute the laws of thought. While Huaping Lu-Adler often refers in passing to logical operations such as syllogisms, she never discusses their rules of operation. She does mention the law/principle of (non)contradiction eight times and that of identity once (p. 14); yet these all appear in quotes or side-comments. (She never mentions the law of excluded middle.) Similarly, she limits her treat- ment of potentially relevant post-Kantian developments in logic to a few brief glosses on Boole and Frege (pp. 3, 195–7), without referring to propositional logic, fuzzy logic, dialetheism, etc. However, this is all by design, so prepared readers need not be surprised by such omissions. Indeed, as the author announces in the Introduction and repeatedly reminds her readers, the book’s focus is on “the philosophy of logic” (pp. 3–4), not on the mechanics of how logical relations as such actually function. The Introduction acknowledges that historians of logic have typically either defined logic narrowly and therefore found nothing new—and thus little worth writing about—in Kant and other Enlightenment philosophers, or else they have followed Kant’s immediate predecessors by defining logic in a broader sense than we do nowadays and have therefore written voluminously on the views of “logic” advanced during this period, but in ways that relate very little to modern con- ceptions of logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy As a Path to Happiness
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Philosophy as a Path to Happiness Attainment of Happiness in Arabic Peripatetic and Ismaili Philosophy Janne Mattila ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XII, University main building, on the 13th of June, 2011 at 12 o’clock. ISBN 978-952-92-9077-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-7001-3 (PDF) http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/ Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2011 2 Abstract The aim of this study is to explore the idea of philosophy as a path to happiness in medieval Arabic philosophy. The starting point is in comparison of two distinct currents within Arabic philosophy between the 10th and early 11th centuries, Peripatetic philosophy, represented by al-Fārābī and Ibn Sīnā, and Ismaili philosophy represented by al-Kirmānī and the Brethren of Purity. These two distinct groups of sources initially offer two contrasting views about philosophy. The attitude of the Peripatetic philosophers is rationalistic and secular in spirit, whereas for the Ismailis philosophy represents the esoteric truth behind revelation. Still, the two currents of thought converge in their view that the ultimate purpose of philosophy lies in its ability to lead man towards happiness. Moreover, they share a common concept of happiness as a contemplative ideal of human perfection, merged together with the Neoplatonic goal of the soul’s reascent to the spiritual world. Finally, for both happiness refers primarily to an otherworldly state thereby becoming a philosophical interpretation of the Quranic accounts of the afterlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme with Abstracts
    Canadian Society of Biblical Studies Annual Meeting Réunion annuelle de la Société canadienne des études bibliques University of Prince Edward Island, Charloteetown, PEI June 8 -11, 1992 / Le 8 - 11 Juin, 1992 Programme with Abstracts MONDAY, JUNE 8 - LUNDI, LE 8 JUIN 13:00-16:00 Kelly Conference Room CSBS Executive Committee Meeting / Réunion du comité executif de la SCÉB 16:00-17:00 CTS Presidential Address PAMELA DICKEY YOUNG 18:00-21:00 Lobster dinner for members of the CSSR, CTS, CSPS and CSBS (by reservation only) / Diner aux homards pour les membres de la SCER, la SCT, l’ACEP, et la SCÉB (avec réservations seulement) WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9 - MARDI, LE 9 JUIN 9:00-12:00 Hebrew Bible / Bible hébraïque Robertson Library 110 ELIZABETH BELEFONTAINE, Mount Saint Vincent University, Presiding/Présidente 9:00 FRANCIS LANDY, University of Alberta Isaiah 28 and the Covenant with Death Isaiah 28 is one of the strangest and poetically most dense chapter in the book, moving from the beauty of Ephraim on the verge of destruction in v. 1 to the excremental vision of v. 8, and thence to the nonsense syllables of vv. 10 and 13. In the centre of the chapter there is a covenant with death, allegedly concluded by the mošlim, ‘ruler/proverb-maker’, of Jerusalem, which is substantiated by a camouflage of illusion (šeqer) wherewith they conceal themselves. The argument of this paper will be that poetry always seeks a covenant with death, attempts to find words that will make sense of the world despite its destruction, that will be heard when we have vanished.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle and Newman on the End of Liberal Education Mary Katherine Tillman
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 6:29 a.m. Paideusis The Philosophic Habit of Mind: Aristotle and Newman on the End of Liberal Education Mary Katherine Tillman Volume 3, Number 2, 1990 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1073397ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1073397ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Canadian Philosophy of Education Society ISSN 0838-4517 (print) 1916-0348 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Tillman, M. (1990). The Philosophic Habit of Mind: Aristotle and Newman on the End of Liberal Education. Paideusis, 3(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.7202/1073397ar ©, 1990 Mary Katherine Tillman This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ The Philosophic Habit of Mind: Aristotle and Newman on the End of Liberal Education Mary Katherine Tillman University of Notre Dame John Henry Newman fiJ'st read Aristotle in 1818 as an undergraduate at Trinity College, Oxford. For his degree examination in 1820, he prepared three of Aristotle's works, the Rhetoric, Poetics, and Nicomachean Ethics. After he was named a Fellow of Oriel College in 1822, Newman worked closely for six years with the influential Dr. Richard Whately, whose textbook on logic replaced the manual used at Oxford for over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Guessing – I
    Machine Guessing { I David Miller Department of Philosophy University of Warwick COVENTRY CV4 7AL UK e-mail: [email protected] ⃝c copyright D. W. Miller 2011{2018 Abstract According to Karl Popper, the evolution of science, logically, methodologically, and even psy- chologically, is an involved interplay of acute conjectures and blunt refutations. Like biological evolution, it is an endless round of blind variation and selective retention. But unlike biological evolution, it incorporates, at the stage of selection, the use of reason. Part I of this two-part paper begins by repudiating the common beliefs that Hume's problem of induction, which com- pellingly confutes the thesis that science is rational in the way that most people think that it is rational, can be solved by assuming that science is rational, or by assuming that Hume was irrational (that is, by ignoring his argument). The problem of induction can be solved only by a non-authoritarian theory of rationality. It is shown also that because hypotheses cannot be distilled directly from experience, all knowledge is eventually dependent on blind conjecture, and therefore itself conjectural. In particular, the use of rules of inference, or of good or bad rules for generating conjectures, is conjectural. Part II of the paper expounds a form of Popper's critical rationalism that locates the rationality of science entirely in the deductive processes by which conjectures are criticized and improved. But extreme forms of deductivism are rejected. The paper concludes with a sharp dismissal of the view that work in artificial intelligence, including the JSM method cultivated extensively by Victor Finn, does anything to upset critical rationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Wallensteen Understanding
    Peter Wallensteen UNDERSTANDING CONFLICT F O U R TH RESOLUTION EDITION SAGE was founded in 1965 by Sara Miller McCune to support the dissemination of usable knowledge by publishing innovative and high-quality research and teaching content. Today, we publish more than 750 journals, including those of more than 300 learned societies, more than 800 new books per year, and a growing range of library products including archives, data, case studies, reports, conference highlights, and video. SAGE remains majority-owned by our founder, and after Sara’s lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures our continued independence. Los Angeles | London | Washington DC | New Delhi | Singapore 00_Wallensteen_Prelims.indd 3 3/11/2015 1:02:59 PM 4 ANALYSING CONFLICT RESOLUTION 4.1 Basic and Complex Levels of Analysis In the preceding chapters, we developed a general understanding of the concept of conflict. This is a necessary initial step in conflict analysis. Here, our task is to approach conflicts where arms are used and the role this gives to conflict resolu- tion. Armed conflict is one category of the general phenomenon of social conflict. It has some distinct features. It normally grows out of non-armed conflict, in the sequences illustrated in Figure 3.3, but involves not just a shift in behaviour. It has other aspects associated with the three concepts of parties, incompatibility and action. First, there is a particular role for the state as soon as a conflict becomes armed. The reasons for this are explained in Section 4.2. There are also armed, as well as unarmed, non-state actors in many armed conflicts, and, for a fuller analy- sis, it is necessary to include them.
    [Show full text]
  • 'History, Method and Pluralism: a Re-Interpretation of Isaiah Berlin's
    HISTORY, METHOD, AND PLURALISM A Re-interpretation of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Thought Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by HAOYEH London School of Economics and Political Science 2005 UMI Number: U205195 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U205195 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 S 510 Abstract of the Thesis In the literature on Berlin to date, two broad approaches to study his political thought can be detected. The first is the piecemeal approach, which tends to single out an element of Berlin’s thought (for example, his distinction between negative liberty and positive liberty) for exposition or criticism, leaving other elements unaccounted. And the second is the holistic approach, which pays attention to the overall structure of Berlin’s thought as a whole, in particular the relation between his defence for negative liberty and pluralism. This thesis is to defend the holistic approach against the piecemeal approach, but its interpretation will differ from the two representative readings, offered by Claude J.
    [Show full text]
  • John Cage's Entanglement with the Ideas Of
    JOHN CAGE’S ENTANGLEMENT WITH THE IDEAS OF COOMARASWAMY Edward James Crooks PhD University of York Music July 2011 John Cage’s Entanglement with the Ideas of Coomaraswamy by Edward Crooks Abstract The American composer John Cage was famous for the expansiveness of his thought. In particular, his borrowings from ‘Oriental philosophy’ have directed the critical and popular reception of his works. But what is the reality of such claims? In the twenty years since his death, Cage scholars have started to discover the significant gap between Cage’s presentation of theories he claimed he borrowed from India, China, and Japan, and the presentation of the same theories in the sources he referenced. The present study delves into the circumstances and contexts of Cage’s Asian influences, specifically as related to Cage’s borrowings from the British-Ceylonese art historian and metaphysician Ananda K. Coomaraswamy. In addition, Cage’s friendship with the Jungian mythologist Joseph Campbell is detailed, as are Cage’s borrowings from the theories of Jung. Particular attention is paid to the conservative ideology integral to the theories of all three thinkers. After a new analysis of the life and work of Coomaraswamy, the investigation focuses on the metaphysics of Coomaraswamy’s philosophy of art. The phrase ‘art is the imitation of nature in her manner of operation’ opens the doors to a wide- ranging exploration of the mimesis of intelligible and sensible forms. Comparing Coomaraswamy’s ‘Traditional’ idealism to Cage’s radical epistemological realism demonstrates the extent of the lack of congruity between the two thinkers. In a second chapter on Coomaraswamy, the extent of the differences between Cage and Coomaraswamy are revealed through investigating their differing approaches to rasa , the Renaissance, tradition, ‘art and life’, and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Righteousness? a Re-Examination of the Idea That Believers Are Clothed in the Righteousness of Christ
    ¯Title Page Alien Righteousness? A Re-examination Of The Idea That Believers Are Clothed In The Righteousness Of Christ Roderick Graciano And it was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Revelation 19.8 i Copyright Notices King James Version of the English Bible, © 1997 by the Online Bible Foundation and Woodside Fellowship of Ontario, Canada. The New American Standard Bible, © 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. The Holy Bible: New International Version, © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. The New King James Version, © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. All Scripture citations are from The New American Standard Bible, © 1995 by The Lockman Foundation, (abbreviated NAU in the narrative) unless otherwise noted. Other versions are normally identified in superscript abbreviation at the verse citation. Because The New American Standard Bible uses italics to identify words and phrases that are not in the original language text, emphasis is occasionally added in this work by using bold type. Permission Permission is hereby given to quote, copy and distribute all or a portion of Alien Righteousness? so long as no portion of it is sold nor used in a work that is for sale, and so long as the author is credited along with www.timothyministries.info as the source, and 2011 is indicated as the copyright date. Any use of all or part of Alien Righteousness? in a work or collection involving, or sold for, a monetary charge requires the express permission of the author who can be contacted at [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • Retrieval and the Doing of Theology
    Volume 23 · Number 2 Summer 2019 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Vol. 23 • Num. 2 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum 3 Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Kevin J. Vanhoozer 7 Staurology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Narrative: Once More unto the Biblical Theological Breach Stephen J. Wellum 35 Retrieval, Christology, and Sola Scriptura Gregg R. Allison 61 The Prospects for a “Mere Ecclesiology” Matthew Barrett 85 Will the Son Rise on a Fourth Horizon? The Heresy of Contemporaneity within Evangelical Biblicism and the Return of the Hermeneutical Boomerang for Dogmatic Exegesis Peter J. Gentry 105 A Preliminary Evaluation and Critique of Prosopological Exegesis Pierre Constant 123 Promise, Law, and the Gospel: Reading the Biblical Narrative with Paul SBJT Forum 137 Gregg R. Allison 157 Four Theses Concerning Human Embodiment Book Reviews 181 Editor-in-Chief: R. Albert Mohler, Jr. • Editor: Stephen J. Wellum • Associate Editor: Brian Vickers • Book Review Editor: John D. Wilsey • Assistant Editor: Brent E. Parker • Editorial Board: Matthew J. Hall, Hershael York, Paul Akin, Timothy Paul Jones, Kody C. Gibson • Typographer: Benjamin Aho • Editorial Office: SBTS Box 832, 2825 Lexington Rd., Louisville, KY 40280, (800) 626-5525, x 4413 • Editorial E-Mail: [email protected] Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum Stephen J. Wellum is Professor of Christian Theology at The Southern Baptist Theo- logical Seminary and editor of Southern Baptist
    [Show full text]