The Entire CV -.Mark Nelson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Books for Regenerating with Ideas People and Planet
regenerating books with ideas for regenerating people and planet FOREIGN RIGHTS CATALOG NEW TITLES environment A thoroughly researched, comprehen- sive overview of our planetary situation and outlook. Schwägerl offers tools to create realistic solutions to our eco- logical crises, and shares his vision of a world that balances ecological sustain- ability, economic prosperity, political justice and cultural vibrancy. November 2014 sustainable living Nelson realized how essential the prop- er use of human waste is to the health of the planet. This, combined with his lifelong love affair with constructed wet- lands, led to the discovery of Wastewater Gardens, an important solution to some of our trickiest global environmental dilemmas. June 2014 consciousness This new edition of the classic work on Buddhism and psychedelics is packed with enlightening entries offering eye-opening insights into alternate methods of inner exploration. May 2015 the time is now ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Are we living in a new geologic epoch where humans are the dominent force on the planet? An award-winning science journalist asks incisive questions about balancing human forces with nature. The Anthropocene The Human Era and How It Shapes Our Planet Christian Schwägerl For more than two decades, award-winning science and environmental journalist, Christian Schwägerl has researched how humans, nature, and technology interact. Schwägerl is in- spired by the idea of Nobel Prize-winning chemist Paul Crutzen who argued that we are now living in a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, a time in which human dominance of Earth’s biological, chemical and geological processes is an undeniable reality, presenting us with a new role as planetary stewards. -
MARIE HARDING CV from Old Website
MARIE HARDING b. November 13, 1941 Glen Cove, L.I., N.Y. EDUCATION 1998 – 99, Karate School of Martial Arts 1995 - 97, 2010 - Tae Kwon Do Institute, Martial Arts. 1994 - University of Phoenix, MBA Program, First Semester. 1965 - New York School of Social research, studies in Asian Art and Tradition. 1965 - Arts Students League, N.Y. 1964 - BA. Degree, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, N.Y., 1959 - Miss Porter's School, Farmington Conn. 1956 – Greenvale School, Glen Cove L.I., N.Y. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2006 – 2006 Chairman Board, Tropic Seas Research, owner RV Heraclitus, Research Vessel 2006- 2008 Board of Directors, Tropic Ventures Research & Education Foundation, Puerto Rico 2006 - Director, Treasurer, Institute of Ecotechnics, NM, 501C3 2004, Treasurer, San Marcos Studio Tour 2004 – 2010 Member, San Marcos District Planning Committee 1998 - President, Synergia Ranch LLC, Center for Innovation and Retreats, Santa Fe, NM 1996 – President, Silver Hills Ranch Homeowners Association 1994 - President, Board of Directors, Global Ecotechnics Corporation, NV, (Formerly EcoFrontiers Company, NV), International Eco-Projects and Biospheric Design, Management & Development. 1994 - President, Tropic Ventures JV; Puerto Rico, Sustainable Forestry 1993 - 1994 Secretary, Planetary Coral Reef Foundation, Coral Reef research, Dolphin release Program. 1992 - 1994 Chief Financial Officer, Finance Committee, Director, V.P., Space Biospheres Ventures, "Biosphere 2”, AZ. 1988 - 1992 Finance Director, Finance Committee, Space Biospheres Ventures, Oracle, AZ. 1989 – 2007, Secretary/Treasurer, Institute of Ecotechnics, UK. 2007 – Ass’t Secretary 1985 - Council Member, Institute of Ecotechnics, UK, ecology, research and management 1973-1985 Co-Founder, Director, Vice President, Institute of Ecotechnics, Santa Fe, NM, U.S.A. 1990 -1993 President, Eco-Frontiers Inc., Texas, Alaska Mining Project 1986 – 1998 Chairman of the Board, Secretary, V.P., EcoWorld Inc., Ecosystems Management at Synergia Ranch, Santa Fe, New Mexico. -
Closed Ecological Systems, Space Life Support and Biospherics
11 Closed Ecological Systems, Space Life Support and Biospherics Mark Nelson, Nickolay S. Pechurkin, John P. Allen, Lydia A Somova, and Josef I. Gitelson CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TERMINOLOGY OF CLOSED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS:FROM LABORATORY ECOSPHERES TO MANMADE BIOSPHERES DIFFERENT TYPES OF CLOSED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS CONCLUSION REFERENCES Abstract This chapter explores the development of a new type of scientific tool – man- made closed ecological systems. These systems have had a number of applications within the past 50 years. They are unique tools for investigating fundamental processes and interactions of ecosystems. They also hold the potentiality for creating life support systems for space exploration and habitation outside of Earth’s biosphere. Finally, they are an experimental method of working with small “biospheric systems” to gain insight into the functioning of Earth’s biosphere. The chapter reviews the terminology of the field, the history and current work on closed ecological systems, bioregenerative space life support and biospherics in Japan, Europe, Russia, and the United States where they have been most developed. These projects include the Bios experiments in Russia, the Closed Ecological Experiment Facility in Japan, the Biosphere 2 project in Arizona, the MELiSSA program of the European Space Agency as well as fundamental work in the field by NASA and other space agencies. The challenges of achieving full closure, and of recycling air and water and producing high- production crops for such systems are discussed, with examples of different approaches being used to solve these problems. The implications for creating sustainable technologies for our Earth’s environment are also illustrated. Key Words Life support r biospherics r bioregenerative r food r air r water recycling r microcosm rclosed ecological systems rBios rNASA rCEEF rBiosphere 2 rBIO-Plex. -
UA-Press-S18-Catalog.Pdf
The University of Arizona Press is the premier publisher of academic, regional, and literary works in the state of Arizona. We disseminate ideas and knowledge of lasting value that enrich understanding, inspire curiosity, and enlighten readers. We advance the University of Arizona’s mission by connecting scholarship and creative expression to readers worldwide. CONTENTS ANTHROPOLOGY, 23, 25, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37 ARCHAEOLOGY, 24, 34, 35, 36, 37 BORDER STUDIES, 14, 19, 20, 21 ECOLOGY, 2–3, 4–5 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 12 HISTORY, 14, 15, 18, 20, 32, 33 INDIGENOUS STUDIES, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 37 LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES, 15, 18, 26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33 LATINO STUDIES, 10, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27 LITERATURE, 8, 9 NATURE, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 12 PHOTOGRAPHY, 6–7 POETRY, 10, 11 SPACE SCIENCE, 13, 38 RECENTLY PUBLISHED, 39-41 SELECTED BEST SELLERS, 42-44 SALES INFORMATION, INSIDE BACK COVER CATALOG DESIGN BY LEIGH MCDONALD COVER PHOTOS: RED CACTUS BLOOM BY WARREN LYNN [FRONT] AND PEACH SPRINGS TRAIL, GRAND CANYON, AZ BY GEORGE WHARTON JAMES [INSIDE] PUSHING OUR LIMITS INSIGHTS FROM BIOSPHERE 2 MARK NELSON A new look at one of the most important experiments of the twentieth century and what it continues to teach us Pushing Our Limits is a fresh examination of Biosphere 2, the world’s first man-made mini-world, twenty-five years after its first closure experiment. Author Mark Nelson, one of the eight crew members locked in the enclosure during the 1991–1993 experiment, offers a compelling insider’s view of the dramatic story behind Biosphere 2. -
Review Article Biosphere 2'S Lessons About Living on Earth and in Space
AAAS Space: Science & Technology Volume 2021, Article ID 8067539, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/8067539 Review Article Biosphere 2’s Lessons about Living on Earth and in Space Mark Nelson Institute of Ecotechnics (US/UK), USA Correspondence should be addressed to Mark Nelson; [email protected] Received 24 June 2020; Accepted 4 January 2021; Published 15 March 2021 Copyright © 2021 Mark Nelson. Exclusive Licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Biosphere 2, the largest and most biodiverse closed ecological system facility yet created, has contributed vital lessons for living with our planetary biosphere and for long-term habitation in space. From the space life support perspective, Biosphere 2 contrasted with previous BLSS work by including areas based on Earth wilderness biomes in addition to its provision for human life support and by using a soil-based intensive agricultural system producing a complete human diet. No previous BLSS system had included domestic farm animals. All human and domestic animal wastes were also recycled and returned to the crop soils. Biosphere 2 was important as a first step towards learning how to miniaturize natural ecosystems and develop technological support systems compatible with life. Biosphere 2’s mostly successful operation for three years (1991-1994) changed thinking among space life support scientists and the public at large about the need for minibiospheres for long-term habitation in space. As an Earth systems laboratory, Biosphere 2 was one of the first attempts to make ecology an experimental science at a scale relevant to planetary issues such as climate change, regenerative agriculture, nutrient and water recycling, loss of biodiversity, and understanding of the roles wilderness biomes play in the Earth’s biosphere. -
Group Dynamics Challenges: Insights from Biosphere 2 Experiments ∗ Mark Nelson A,B,C, , Kathelin Gray A,B,C, John P
Life Sciences in Space Research 6 (2015) 79–86 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Life Sciences in Space Research www.elsevier.com/locate/lssr Review article Group dynamics challenges: Insights from Biosphere 2 experiments ∗ Mark Nelson a,b,c, , Kathelin Gray a,b,c, John P. Allen a,b,c a Institute of Ecotechnics, London, UK b Institute of Ecotechnics, Santa Fe, NM, United States c Biospheric Design Division, Global Ecotechnics Corporation, Santa Fe, NM, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Successfully managing group dynamics of small, physically isolated groups is vital for long duration space Received 14 May 2015 exploration/habitation and for terrestrial CELSS (Controlled Environmental Life Support System) facilities Received in revised form 3 July 2015 with human participants. Biosphere 2 had important differences and shares some key commonalities Accepted 5 July 2015 with both Antarctic and space environments. There were a multitude of stress factors during the first two year closure experiment as well as mitigating factors. A helpful tool used at Biosphere 2 was the Keywords: Group dynamics work of W.R. Bion who identified two competing modalities of behavior in small groups. Task-oriented Biosphere 2 groups are governed by conscious acceptance of goals, reality-thinking in relation to time and resources, Isolated confined extreme environment and intelligent management of challenges. The opposing unconscious mode, the “basic-assumption” (ICE) (“group animal”) group, manifests through Dependency/Kill the Leader, Fight/Flight and Pairing. These W.R. Bion unconscious dynamics undermine and can defeat the task group’s goal. -
Remembrances of Harold Morowitz, by His Friends and Collaborators at the Institute of Ecotechnics
Three remembrances of Harold Morowitz, by his friends and collaborators at the Institute of Ecotechnics Submitted to the Santa Fe Institute September 18, 2017 FROM JOHN ALLEN, Inventor, Biosphere 2 Harold Morowitz was a marvelous scientist, friend, ally, and total systems thinker. Obviously Biosphere 2, of which Harold served as a Scientific Advisor, benefited greatly from his thought, right-on comments and suggestions, as did so many others working in cutting edge life sciences. Harold also mastered the art of intelligent conversation and brought a civilizing grace to the most ardent arguments on the fine points of complex life systems. John Allen, FLS FROM MARK NELSON, Chairman, Institute of Ecotechnics and Biospherian. Harold was a key advisor to the Biosphere 2 project. He served on its Scientific Advisory Committee and continued as a consultant through the end of the first two-year closure experiment and a second closure experiment. He had an amazingly broad scope of scientific work – from the origins of life, energy flow in biology to Earth evolution and the expansion of life outside our planet. He became a dear friend to many of us at Biosphere 2 and in the Institute of Ecotechnics. Harold participated in the Third International Conference on Closed Ecological Systems and Bioregenerative Life Support in April 1992 at Biosphere 2 and inspired us by speaking about how this new type of facility could help ecology become an experimental science. He was also a real mensch and a one-of-a-kind human being. Mark Nelson, Chairman, Institute of Ecotechnics FROM KATHELIN GRAY Co-founder, Institute of Ecotechnics For 20 years, Harold was a friend and colleague of some of us in Institute of Ecotechnics. -
Life Support Inside Biosphere 2'S Glass Box Theater, 1991-1993
Performing Sustainability: Life Support Inside Biosphere 2’s Glass Box Theater, 1991-1993 Meredith Sattler Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ABSTRACT: Recently, the term Performative Architecture has been increasingly used as a pseudonym for sustainable design. In the case of Biosphere 2 (B2), performative architecture became not only a service oriented container for long-duration life support, it became the stage on which multiple sustainability narratives were played out. Perhaps unconsciously achieved by the project’s architects, Phil Haws and Margaret Augustine, the functional form of B2 provided the front-of-house and back-of-house venues that propelled the operation, and the perception of sustainable life-support during Mission 1. This paper defines the troupe of performers: ecology, ecotechnics, Biospherians, scientists, tourists, and popular media, and utilizes their performances upon the B2 stage to unpack the ensuing drama of Mission 1 through the lens of this glass box theater architecture, while speculating on the value of the lessons learned for today’s performative architectures. Here, conventionally understood quantitative aspects of performative architecture link the eco-technological design and operation of B2 to qualitative humanities based frameworks of Performativity such as theater, service oriented design, and object studies. Through the case study of B2, it becomes apparent how and why these coupled quantitative/qualitative understandings are critical to the future success of performative architecture -