DOCSLIB.ORG

Peaked Hill Reservation Chilmark, Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peaked Hill Reservation Chilmark, Massachusetts Peaked Hill Reservation Chilmark, Massachusetts Management Plan Revised April 27, 2018 Approved by the Chilmark Town Advisory Board () Approved by the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank Commission () Approved by the Secretary of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs () Julie Russell – Ecologist Executive Summary Featuring the highest point in the prominent range hills that form the terminal moraine of the Wisconsin stage glaciers, Peaked Hill Reservation straddles North and Middle Road. The Reservation comprises 148.9 acres in Chilmark and has an undulating contour of wooded hill crests and valleys of both open pastures and dense tangled shrublands. From the reservation emerge the headwaters of Roaring Brook, Fulling Mill Brook and Mill Brook. Boulders of varying shapes and sizes dust the surface while stonewalls meandering through the woodland attest to the countless smaller stones cleared for agrarian uses long ago. The property is eponymously named for the prominent Peaked Hill that rises into an assembly of four peaks with heights reaching 311 feet. This marks the tallest locale on Martha’s Vineyard. The name Peaked is derived from “peak” meaning “the crest or summit of a hill or mountain ending in a point; a mountain with such a pointed summit; the highest or utmost point of anything; the top rear corner of a fore-and-aft sail, the upper end of the gaff.” Being the tallest hill on the island, and given the island’s strong history with the sea, one could foster the image of Peaked Hill as the tallest ships sail among the fleet of hills in the northern moraine. The hill may also have been used as a site mark for recording boundaries in the early deeds. One such example occurs in a deed from Mary Hillman et al. to Ephraim Mayhew dated June 10, 1858. The property being described “on the North by Chilmark pond, on the East by land of Ephraim Mayhew, on a straight line striking the West ridge of a barn formerly owned by Mary Hancock on a line with a peaked rock on the hill near where the house of James Allen stood, on the West by meadow land of Charles Weeks and George D. Cottle, on the South including all the meadows and beach that belonged to former owners of the above described premises” (Dukes County Registry of Deeds, Book 38, Pages 276- 278). The Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank Commission purchased, in fee simple, the 148.9 acres of Peaked Hill Reservation as follows: 71.6 acres at auction from NWE, Inc., an agent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, on July 29, 1992 for $700,000; 17.9 acres from June Brehm Tabor et al. for $800,000; 7.4 acres from Frederick N. Khedouri in the form of a conservation restriction on December 03, 1999 for no payment; 15.6 acres (of 17 acres) from James Allen Athearn et al. in the form of an agricultural preservation restriction on August 31, 2000 for $459,000; 21.9 acres from Jeffery D. Hutchins, trustee of June Brehm Tabor trust on December 23, 2002 for $1,9000,000; and 12.3 acres from Kerry M. Elkin on April 15, 2008 for $825,000 of which 10.5 acres were previously subjected to land bank conservation and agricultural restrictions purchased from Mr. Elkin on June 26 and December 29, 1998 for $195,000. Seven commonwealth-listed wildlife species – Gerhard’s underwing (Catocala herodia gerhardi), imperial moth (Eacles imperialis), Melsheimer’s sack-bearer (Cicinnus meisheimeri), coastal healthland cutworm (Abagrotis nefascia), eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina), purple tiger beetle (Cicindela purpurea) and northern parula (Parula americana) – were recorded during surveys on the reservation. One commonwealth-listed plant species – sandplain blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium fuscatum) – along with five watch-listed plant species – woolly panic grass (Dichanthelium acuminatum ssp. acimunatum), awned wheat grass (Elymus trachycaulus ssp. Trachycaulus), butterfly weed (Asclepias tuberosa), Nuttail’s milkwort (Polygala nuttalii) and little ladies-tresses (Spirnathes tuberosa) – are known to occur on the reservation. This management plan proposes promoting quail and woodcock habitat and plant diversity by converting 7.4 acres of mixed-oak woodland on the ridge of Peaked Hill to a mosaic of grassland, heathland and low shrubland; continuing to maintain the existing 1.3-acre grassland clearing on the southern summit of Peaked Hill; and continuing to maintain the 3.0-acre greenbrier shrubland that exists adjacent to the proposed ridge management area. The plan proposes to expand agricultural land by clearing 4.6 acres of shrubland and creating a 6.4-acre leasehold and create roadside views of the reservation through a 1-acre clearing along North Road. The plan also proposes to expand the trail system to include 4306’ of additional trail. In addition to the proposed objectives, the management plan includes maintaining the existing trail system of 2.2 miles at a width of 6 feet; controlling erosion issues; controlling invasive species; leasing 13.25 acres of open land for agricultural uses; maintaining existing viewsheds; and highlighting historical features of the reservation such as stone walls, prominent boulders and remnants of military fortifications. This management plan updates a December 29, 1993 plan and presents and analyzes the results of ecological inventories of the reservation. All planning goals, objectives and strategies are outlined in detail in the final section of this management plan. To be implemented, this plan must be presented at a public hearing and approved by the land bank’s Chilmark town advisory board, the Martha’s Vineyard land bank commission and the secretary of the executive office of energy and environmental affairs (EOEEA). About the author Julie Russell is the primary author and has been the land bank ecologist since August 1999. She is certified as a Wildlife Biologist by the Wildlife Society and holds a Master of Science in zoology from the Cooperative Wildlife Research Lab at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, and a Bachelor of Science in wildlife biology from the School of Natural Resources at the University of Vermont. This plan is executed under the supervision of the land superintendent, Ian Peach. Superintendent Ian Peach attended Middlebury College and graduated with a Bachelors of Arts and has a Master of Landscape Architecture from Cornell University. PEAKED HILL RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents I. Natural Resource Inventory .................................................................................................... 6 A. Physical Characteristics..................................................................................................... 6 1. Locus .............................................................................................................................. 6 2. Survey Maps, Deeds and Preliminary Management Plan Goals ..................................... 6 3. Geology and Soils........................................................................................................... 6 4. Topography .................................................................................................................... 7 5. Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 7 6. Ecological Processes ...................................................................................................... 7 B. Biological Characteristics ..................................................................................................10 1. Vegetation ......................................................................................................................10 2. Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................................................10 C. Cultural Characteristics ....................................................................................................12 1. Land History ...................................................................................................................12 2. Planning Concerns .........................................................................................................19 3. Abutters ..........................................................................................................................20 4. Existing Use and Infrastructure .......................................................................................20 II. Inventory Analysis .................................................................................................................23 A. Constraints & Issues ........................................................................................................23 1. Ecological Context .........................................................................................................23 2. Natural and Cultural Resource Concerns .......................................................................23 3. Sociological Context ......................................................................................................25 4. Neighborhood Concerns ................................................................................................25 B. Addressing Problems and Opportunities ...........................................................................26 1. Land Bank Mandate .......................................................................................................26 2. Goals at Purchase .........................................................................................................26
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LITERA TURE CITED CLOKEY, IW 951. Flora Of
    24 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPI'ERISTS' SOCIETY LITERA TURE CITED CLOKEY, I. W. 951. Flora of the Charleston Mountains, Clark County, Nevada. Univ. Calif. Publ. Botany, No. 24. EMMEL, J. F. & O. SHIELDS. The biology of Plebejus (Icaricia) shasta in the western United Sta s (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid., in press. FERRIS, C. D. 976. Revisionary notes on Plebejus (Icaricia) shasta (Edwards). Bull. Allyn Mus m, No. 36. GARTH,]. S. 1 8. Report of the Lorquin Entomological Society of Los Angeles. Proc. So. Calif. A ad. Sci. 27: 93-94. HALL, E. R. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. HOWE, W. H. 1975. The butterflies of North America. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y. JOHNSON, N. K. 1965. The breeding avifaunas of the Sheep and Spring ranges in southern Nevada. Condor 67: 93-124. SMITHE, F. B. 1975. Naturalist's color guide. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Societ!J 34(1), 1980,24 THE IDENTITY OF THE PLANT REFERRED TO AS ANDROMEDA BY W. T. M. FORBES The name Andromeda has been used ambiguously in the lepidopteran literature. A striking example is in its mention as a larval host for Datana major Grote and Robinson and Datana ranaeceps (Guerin) by Forbes (1948, Lepidoptera of New York ... II: Cornell U. Agric. Expt. Sta. Mem. 274, p. 215). The ranges of both of these species lie almost entirely to the south and east of the only species of the genus Andromeda covered by Fernald (1950, Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed. Amer. Book Co., N.Y., p.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioblitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List
    BioBlitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List Sort Family Species 00366 Tineidae Acrolophus mortipennella 00372 Tineidae Acrolophus plumifrontella Eastern Grass Tubeworm Moth 00373 Tineidae Acrolophus popeanella 00383 Tineidae Acrolophus texanella 00457 Psychidae Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis Evergreen Bagworm Moth 01011 Oecophoridae Antaeotricha schlaegeri Schlaeger's Fruitworm 01014 Oecophoridae Antaeotricha leucillana 02047 Gelechiidae Keiferia lycopersicella Tomato Pinworm 02204 Gelechiidae Fascista cercerisella 02301.2 Gelechiidae Dichomeris isa 02401 Yponomeutidae Atteva aurea 02401 Yponomeutidae Atteva aurea Ailanthus Webworm Moth 02583 Sesiidae Synanthedon exitiosa 02691 Cossidae Fania nanus 02694 Cossidae Prionoxystus macmurtrei Little Carpenterworm Moth 02837 Tortricidae Olethreutes astrologana The Astrologer 03172 Tortricidae Epiblema strenuana 03202 Tortricidae Epiblema otiosana 03494 Tortricidae Cydia latiferreanus Filbert Worm 03573 Tortricidae Decodes basiplaganus 03632 Tortricidae Choristoneura fractittana 03635 Tortricidae Choristoneura rosaceana Oblique-banded Leafroller moth 03688 Tortricidae Clepsis peritana 03695 Tortricidae Sparganothis sulfureana Sparganothis Fruitworm Moth 03732 Tortricidae Platynota flavedana 03768.99 Tortricidae Cochylis ringsi 04639 Zygaenidae Pyromorpha dimidiata Orange-patched Smoky Moth 04644 Megalopygidae Lagoa crispata Black Waved Flannel Moth 04647 Megalopygidae Megalopyge opercularis 04665 Limacodidae Lithacodes fasciola 04677 Limacodidae Phobetron pithecium Hag Moth 04691 Limacodidae
    [Show full text]
  • Field Observations of Divergent Resting Behavior Among Hickory Feeding Catocala Larvae (Noctuidae)
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' SOciety 36(4), 1982,303 GENERAL NOTES FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF DIVERGENT RESTING BEHAVIOR AMONG HICKORY FEEDING CATOCALA LARVAE (NOCTUIDAE) Catoeala are known for their sympatric diversity, with at least 35 species present at almost any forested locality in southern New England (see Sargent, 1976, Legion of night: The underwing moths, Univ. Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA; also personal observation). Of these, about one third feed on Juglandaceae (hickories and walnuts). The precise foodplant preferences of these Juglandaceae feeders will be the topic of another paper (Schweitzer, in prep.) and are also being investigated by L. F. Gall. Sargent (1976, op. cit.; 1977, J. Lepid. Soc. 31:1-16) suggested that food may not be an important limiting factor in Catocala evolution. "Competition" for predator avoidance might be more important in Catocala ecology. Such competition might be manifest in different larval resting behaviors, which might serve to inhibit effective search image formation by predators, especially birds. Sargent (1976, op. cit.) reports laboratory obser­ vations of instar specific resting behaviors in Catocala dejecta Strecker and C. retecta Grote which were reared in plastic containers on Carya ovata. Although similar in ap­ pearance the two species grow at very different rates and so avoid having similar size and behavior simultaneously. Little is known about field resting habits of most Catocala species. From my own observations it seems that late instar C. epione (Drury) and C. c. consors 0. E. Smith) larvae almost invariably rest on branches or small trunks. Late instars of Catocala habilis larvae are quite flattened and can be found resting under bark shags.
    [Show full text]
  • Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005 This goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principle federal agency for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish and wildlife in their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 96-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of 544 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 65 national fish hatcheries and 78 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Aid program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and Systematics of the Eurasian
    DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Az eurázsiai Craniophora Snellen, 1867 fajok taxonómiája és szisztematikája (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) PhD thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés Kiss Ádám Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2017. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Kiss Ádám Tanúsítom, hogy Kiss Ádám doktorjelölt 2011 – 2014. között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori értekezés betétlapja Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológiai tudományágban Írta: Kiss Ádám okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Prof. Dr. Dévai György tagok: Prof. Dr. Bakonyi Gábor Dr. Rácz István András
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetened Water Preserve
    SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN The Southern Woodlands Reservation Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts Management Plan December 20, 2010 Approved by the Oak Bluffs Town Advisory Board () Approved by the Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Commission () Approved by the Secretary of the Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Julie Russell – Ecologist Maureen McManus Hill – Administrative Assistant Matthew Dix – Property Foreman Jeffrey Komarinetz, Jean-Marc Dupon and James Dropick – Conservation Land Assistants SECOND HALF (APPENDIX) 1 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix A: Locus and Topography Maps 2 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix B: Surveys, Deeds and Preliminary Management Plan Goals Deeds and larger copies of the surveys are on file at the land bank office. They include the following: 5 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 7 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 8 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 9 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 11 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 12 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 13 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 14 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 15 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 16 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 17 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 18 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 19 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 20 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 21 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 22 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 23 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 24 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix C: Soils Maps and Descriptions 25 SOUTHERN WOODLANDS RESERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN The dominant soil on the preserve is Carver Loamy Coarse Sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Samia Cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- Place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates
    ________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 61, Number 4 Winter 2019 www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________________________________________ Inside: Butterflies of Papua Southern Pearly Eyes in exotic Louisiana venue Philippine butterflies and moths: a new website The Lepidopterists’ Society collecting statement updated Lep Soc, Southern Lep Soc, and Assoc of Trop Lep combined meeting Butterfly vicariance in southeast Asia Samia cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates ... and more! ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Contents www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________ Digital Collecting -- Butterflies of Papua, Indonesia ____________________________________ Bill Berthet. .......................................................................................... 159 Volume 61, Number 4 Butterfly vicariance in Southeast Asia Winter 2019 John Grehan. ........................................................................................ 168 Metamorphosis. ....................................................................................... 171 The Lepidopterists’ Society is a non-profit ed- Membership Updates. ucational and scientific organization. The ob- Chris Grinter. ....................................................................................... 171
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]