DOCSLIB.ORG

Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Document – Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Document – Public Chiltern District Council Summary of Responses to the Consultation on the Residential Extensions and Householder Development Supplementary Planning Document - Public Consultation Document (March 2013) August 2013 Version 1.0 1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Who was consulted about the SPD and how were they consulted? ........................... 3 Summary of main issues in the responses and addressing the main issues raised ... 4 Table 1: Summary of Responses to the SPD ........................................................ 5 Appendix 1 List of organisations consulted about the SPD ...................................... 10 2 Introduction 1. This document shows a summary of the main issues which were raised in the responses to the consultation on the Residential Extensions and Householder Development Supplementary Planning Document. – Public Consultation Document (March 2013). It also shows how the main issues have been considered, how the consultation was carried out and who was consulted. This document has been prepared following the Government’s regulations for producing SPDs1and in accordance with the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement. Who was consulted about the SPD and how were they consulted? 2. In total over 300 organisations and individuals were sent a letter / email about the SPD which asked them to make comments. A response form for making comments was available on the Council’s website. The organisations consulted included Town and Parish Councils in the District, revitalisation groups, local groups, organisations and individuals on the Council’s Local Development Framework consultation data base. To see a list of organisations who were consulted about the SPD see Appendix 1. 3. The consultation period for the SPD was 8 weeks from 8th April to the 7th June 2013. This timescale was chosen so as to correspond with the consultation period for the Delivery Development Plan Document. This time period therefore complies with, and significantly exceeds, the SPD regulations, which require that the consultation period has to be not less than 4 weeks. 4. The Council used various other ways to draw attention to the opportunity to make comments on the SPD. This included publication of the SPD on the Council’s website, provision of copies of the SPD in the Planning Services area of the Council’s reception, distributing copies of the SPD to eight libraries who serve the District area (including the four community libraries) and placing a press release in the local paper at the start of the consultation period. 1 The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. 3 Summary of main issues in the responses and addressing the main issues raised 5. Twelve individuals/organisations made duly made responses on the SPD. Responses came from a variety of organisations. A list of those responding and a summary of their comments, together with a proposed response, can be found below in Table 1. Potential changes to the SPD are highlighted in the last column of the table. 4 Table 1: Summary of Responses to the SPD Respondent / Support / Object / Summary of Comment(s) CDC Response Possible Change to SPD? Organisation Comment / Not Received Specified (S/O/C/N) Network Rail Not specified As Network Rail is a statutory Comments noted but not relevant to No change needed undertaker please ensure that we the contents of the SPD. are consulted on all planning applications for extensions and householder development adjacent to our land and the operational railway. Highways Not specified The HA will be concerned with Comments noted but not relevant to No change needed Agency proposals that have the potential to the contents of the SPD. impact the safe and efficient operation of the SRN. We have reviewed the consultations and do not have any comments at this time. Health and Not specified Thank you for inviting the Health and Noted. No change needed. Safety Safety Executive to comment on the Executive above documents. Health and Safety Executive does not wish to submit any comments. Chiltern Support Thank you for consulting the Support welcomed. No change needed. Conservation Chilterns Conservation Board in Board connection with the above. The Board welcomes the production of the SPD and supports the document as drafted, particularly in connection with the prominence given to the need to adhere to the advice in the Chilterns Building Design Guide and the Supplementary Technical Notes on Flint, Brick and Roofing Materials. 5 Respondent / Support / Object / Summary of Comment(s) CDC Response Possible Change to SPD? Organisation Comment / Not Received Specified (S/O/C/N) Amersham Support/Comment Overall, the guidelines are extremely Support is welcomed. Officers use No change needed. District useful. With regard to applications the 45 (and 60) degree diagrams Residents for extensions - a simple guidance that you have referred to as a guide Association on the 45 degree light line from the but non compliance may not centre of a window of a normal room necessarily lead to a development to the neighbour’s proposed building proposal being unacceptable. It is line –as in some of the Council’s old considered that the wording in the documents, will save lot of SPD addresses the issue of aggravation for both the parties – the concern. applicant as well as the neighbour! Natural Not specified We have no comments to make with Noted. No change needed. England regard to this SPD. Mr. Carl Object Hiding away behind planning With regard to flat roofs, it is Flat roofs p. 5 at the end of the first Skinner documents is no substitute for face acknowledged that modern building sentence add “although modern to face meetings. The document is materials have led to a greater life building materials and methods can very one sided and is based on span for flat roofs and the text will be improve both lifespan and personal opinion rather than adjusted accordingly to reflect this. It maintenance costs.” Government guidelines on planning. is also agreed to amend the text on More specifically, the statements crown roofs. In relation to amenity, it Crown Roofs p. 5 to read “Crown made on page 5 are incorrect in that is not agreed that the SPD is roofs can result in a building which 1. flat roofs no longer have shorter misleading. appears bulky and are not generally life spans than pitched roofs 2. crown encouraged. They frequently roofs aren’t bulky when designed indicate that a building span or properly and 3. with regard to footprint is too large. Crown roofs amenity, to suggest that past may however be acceptable in precedents do not play a large part in locations where the roof form would legal disputes is misleading. not be prominent, especially if there are other acceptable examples of crown roofs in the vicinity.” No other changes needed. 6 Respondent / Support / Object / Summary of Comment(s) CDC Response Possible Change to SPD? Organisation Comment / Not Received Specified (S/O/C/N) Robin A Support/ Object This document is generally well- Support welcomed. Crown Roofs p. 5 to read “Crown Bretherick and written and helpful. The criticism of roofs can result in a building which Fraser crown roofs is however ill-founded. Crown roofs – agree to modify the appears bulky and are not generally Kirkcaldy With regard to two-storey extensions, text. encouraged. They frequently in some circumstances consideration indicate that a building span or should be given to maintaining With regard to setting back the first footprint is too large. Crown roofs apparent space around a building by floor of a 2- storey side extension, may however be acceptable in setting back the first floor of a 2- roof alterations and large flat-roof locations where the roof form would storey extension (from the front) dormer windows, it is not considered not be prominent, especially if there rather than setting in 1m from the that the advice contained in the SPD are other acceptable examples of boundary e.g. for semis. With regard should be changed. The SPD is crown roofs in the vicinity.” to roof alterations to bungalows, it is guidance and for setting out key suggested that in many principles of design. For example, Include additional text on Areas of circumstances it is preferable to raise the SPD does not preclude the Little Change in Annex 2. the roof to form a two storey dwelling raising of a bungalow roof to form a than to add dormer windows. In full two-storey dwelling. No other changes needed. addition, large flat-roof dormer windows, if well detailed (and of a Comments on Residential Parking suitably modest scale) can be are noted but it is not considered visually acceptable on the front roof necessary to amend the SPD. slope, especially for larger detached houses. Inadequate parking, as a It is agreed that Annex 2 on result of expanding an existing Planning Constraints should include house, should only be an issue in reference to Areas of Little Change. exceptional circumstances. Annex 2 Planning Constraints should make reference to the fact that stricter constraints exist within Areas of Little Change. Mr. Adrian Object Objects to the relaxation of existing Changes to the planning regulations No change needed. Norris planning regulations relating to are undertaken by the Government residential and commercial and so beyond the scope of this development extension proposals SPD. The scope of this SPD does within Green Belt and within the not include replacement dwellings. AONB, other than one for one replacement of existing houses under the current rules for development within the Green Belt/ AONB. 7 Respondent / Support / Object / Summary of Comment(s) CDC Response Possible Change to SPD? Organisation Comment / Not Received Specified (S/O/C/N) Mrs Carole Object (2 ‘Significant tree’ should be defined The SPD provides guidance and it is Daylight and Sunlight pgs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Beautiful 2 Bedroom Detached Cottage Within the Rural Village of Chenies. Throughout the Property Has Been Finished to the Highest Standard
    A beautiful 2 bedroom detached cottage within the rural village of Chenies. Throughout the property has been finished to the highest standard. Available 1st March and unfurnished. Chenies Hill, Latimer, Chesham, Buckinghamshire, HP5 £1,900 pcm plus fees apply, Unfurnished Available from 01.03.2021 • Detached • 2 Bedrooms • 1 bathroom • Private garden • Off street parking for 2 cars • Unfurnished • Available 2 November Local Information Grove at Watford. There are Situated in the beautiful and picturesque walks and bridle historically important Chiltern paths around Chenies and the village of Chenies on the Chess Valley. Bucks/Herts boundary. The village offers a primary school, About this property cricket club, St Michaels Church, Throughout the property has been a public house and the Bedford finished to the highest standard. Arms Hotel. Downstairs, comprises of entrance hallway (with storage The most notable feature of the cupboard), guest cloakroom, village is the beautiful and historic separate kitchen / breakfast room, Chenies Manor. This Grade I charming lounge with open fire listed, semi-fortified brick manor and direct access to garden. house, known formerly as Chenies Palace was owned by First floor, landing (with storage the Cheyne family who were cupboard), master bedroom, granted manorial rights in 1180. further double bedroom, family Both Henry VIII and Queen bathroom with both separate Elizabeth I visited the house on shower and bath. numerous occasions. Chorleywood, Rickmansworth The property has amply off street and nearby Amersham offer good parking, private garden, double local shopping and restaurants glazed and the heating / hot water and the food halls of Waitrose is provided by an 'air source heat and Marks & Spencer.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalfont St Peter Neighbourhood Plan Appendices 2013
    Chalfont St Peter Neighbourhood Plan Appendices 2013 - 2028 Chalfont St Peter Parish Council ❚ Contents Appendix A Shop Front Design Guide 1 A1 Introduction 2 A2 Design Guidance 4 A3 Design checklist 8 Appendix B Character Appraisal 9 B1 Introduction 10 B2 Historic development and urban structure of Chalfont St Peter 11 B3 Landscape setting 12 B4 Character assessment 14 Appendix C Planning Application Requirements 37 Appendix D Glossary 45 5360 Neighbourhood Plan Appendices.indd Appendix A Shop Front Design Guide Neighbourhood Plan Chalfont St Peter - Appendices 1 ❚ A1 Introduction Introduction Shop frontage design issues Chalfont St Peter Village Centre forms the retail focus for The diagram (figure 1.1) opposite sets out the key features of the Parish as a whole. As set out in Appendix B, the village shopfronts. centre has a distinctive character that is very important to the The design issues that tend to undermine the quality and overall character and quality of Chalfont St Peter. The design character of shop fronts in Chalfont St Peter Parish include: of shopfronts within the village centre has a significant impact on this character and quality. This Neighbourhood ■■ architectural features such as pilasters and stall risers are Plan therefore seeks to protect good shopfronts and improve removed, so that the shop front becomes a rather bland others through guidance that is specific to Chalfont St Peter. expanse of glazing that lacks the richness of traditional shop fronts; In addition to shops in the village centre, there are shops within other parts of the village. This guidance also applies ■■ solid aluminium shutters or perforated/pinhole shutters to these shops.
    [Show full text]
  • Site CD0008 - Chesham Car and Van Sales Bellingdon Road(Chesham Parish), Chiltern District
    Site CD0008 - Chesham Car and Van Sales Bellingdon Road(Chesham Parish), Chiltern District 3 2 0 7 1 2 2 F 5 F 7 0 ¯ 4 5 0 2 3 5 3 1 Def 2 Esprit 9 5 F 5 F 1 F 1 F 3 1 RO F AD Works W 108.2m F W 5 El F F 1 23 7 C 4 F 43 C W 1 41 39 107.0m Gardens 29 6 32 TCB B 6 E 3 L L IN 1 G 5 D 2 O 12 N 3 R O A 1 D 24 5 8 5 8 5 1 9 6 2 1 8 7 23 9 1 2 35 0 9 to H 2 2 5 9 A 2 2 2 R 5 to R IE 2 4 S 8 7 8 C 1 L 1 3 O 1 S 19 E 6 106.1m 7 Not to Scale 1 to 9 Legend Chiltern District Brownfield Land Register Part 1 Site Site CD0031 - Wicks Garage Rignall Road(Great Missenden Parish), Chiltern District ¯ Orchard Corner 6 7 1 3 e g a r a L G C D N A L D 2 A 1 E H 133.4m The Old Orchard 5 133.6m 3 1 El Su b Sta 34 5 3 32 Cherry Tree Cottage 1 t Not to Scale 11 o 18 Legend Chiltern District Brownfield Land Register Part 1 Site Green Belt Site CD0109 - Coach Depot and Adjacent Land Lycrome Road, Lye Green (Chesham Parish), Chiltern District El P ¯ Def Mattesdon T o b B H a o r u n s s e i t Lye Green e 2 1 161.5m Bus Depot D A O R 7 El 6 4 th 3 a 2 Cat P Whitehouse GP Willow Bank Delmar 161.8m GP E T L e e e g l g a a t a t d t t o Note: Ann y future development proposals should consider that the site is o C e l C e within thG e Green Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Providing a Tourism Baseline in the HS2 Corridor
    The volume and value of tourism in the HS2 corridor of the Chilterns AONB A baseline study Prepared by: TSE Research Services 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH Contributors and dedication Dedication This report is dedicated to Shirley Judges, (1949-2014), a passionate supporter and ardent protector of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Without Shirley’s infectious enthusiasm this project would not have happened. Shirley gave unstintingly of her time and energy to protect the area she loved from HS2, but she also knew the importance of assembling robust evidence, using recognised research methods and arming oneself with the relevant facts and figures to fight a cause. Drive and determination had to matched by the evidence. Shirley wanted a proper baseline study on the value of tourism threatened by HS2. At her specific request we raised the money and commissioned Tourism South East, a specialist tourist organisation with a research arm, to undertake the study. The Chilterns Conservation Board, where Shirley had been a dedicated board member for 10 years, kindly agreed to manage the project. Shirley’s wish was to petition to the Select Committee. Through this report she will. Acknowledgements The following organisations provided a financial contribution to the study: Amersham HS2 Action Group Chesham Society Chilterns Conservation Board Chiltern Ridges Action Group Chiltern Society Great Missenden HS2 Action Group Great Missenden Parish Council Great Missenden Revitalisation Group Great Missenden Village Association Private donation (on behalf of Chalfont St Giles) Residents’ Environmental Protection Association Wendover Action Group Wendover Parish Council Thanks With thanks to the many people who contributed to the local tourism business audits, in particular Hilary Wharf and Jean Slater.
    [Show full text]
  • Beautiful Family Home in Chalfont St. Peter
    BEAUTIFUL FAMILY HOME IN CHALFONT ST. PETER BEACON CLOSE CHALFONT ST. PETER, SL9 £2,950 pcm, Unfurnished + £285 inc VAT tenancy paperwork fee and other charges apply*. BEAUTIF UL FAMILY HOME IN CHALFONT ST. PETER BEACON CLOSE CHALFONT ST. PETER, GERRARDS CROSS, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, SL9 0AW £2,950 pcm, Unfurnished + £285 inc VAT tenancy paperwork fee and other charges apply*. Beautiful Family Home • 4 Bedrooms • Large Open Plan Kitchen/Dining area • Reception Room • Family Bathroom • Study • En Suite • Guest WC • Utility Room • 2 Private Patio Areas • Large Front Garden • Driveway Parking • EPC Rating = D Council Tax = G Situation The property is located a short distance from the village of Chalfont St Peter with a selection of shops and restaurants. Buckinghamshire schooling has a fine reputation and this Property will be in the catchment for a wide range of schools in the area. You are also within two miles of Gerrards Cross with its comprehensive shopping facilities, restaurants and cinema together with the station offering the London commuter a Chiltern line service into Marylebone in about 30 minutes. Access onto the A413 is easy and provides access to the M40 at Denham which connects to the M25 and Heathrow airport. Description Beautiful family home in Chalfont St. Peter which is nestled in this private cul-de-sac and located a short distance from this pretty market town. Throughout the house is a vast space and is brilliantly flanked by two large patio areas while the mature front garden offers privacy. The lower level of the house has wood flooring throughout, a large bright reception room with log burner with double doors leading to one of the patio areas, the modern kitchen is open plan to a large family room with another log burner and bi-folding doors leading to a 2nd patio area, a utility room is also present just off the kitchen, guest WC and finally a study/5th bedroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education
    Buckinghamshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education Annual Report 2017-18 Learning and growing through challenging RE 1 Contents Page No. Foreword from the Chair……………………………………………………………….. 1. Standards and quality of provision of RE: 2. Managing the SACRE and Partnership with the LA and Other Key Stakeholders: 3. Effectiveness of the Agreed Syllabus: 4. Collective Worship: 5. SACRE and School Improvement: Appendix 1: Examination data…………………….………………………………… Appendix 2: Diversity in Christianity ……………………………………………… Appendix 3: SACRE Membership and attendance for the year 2016/2017…… 2 Learning and growing through challenging RE Foreword from the Chair of SACRE September 2017 - July 2018 As with any organisation it is the inspiration given by the members that provides the character. I shall focus on some of the creativity we have valued in Bucks SACRE this year both from our members and during our visits to schools. In addition, we receive wise counsel from our Education Officer at Bucks CC, Katherine Wells and our RE Adviser Bill Moore. At our meeting in October we learned that Suma Din our Muslim deputy had become a school governor and would no longer fulfil her role with SACRE. However, her legacy to us is her book published by the Institute of Education Press entitled ‘Muslim Mothers and their children’s schooling.’ See SACRED 7, for a review. (For this and all other references to SACRED see the website at the end of this section). In her contribution to SACRED 6 Suma wrote; From the Qur’an, I understand my role as being a ‘steward’ on this earth; one who will take care, take responsibility and hand on a legacy to those who come after them.
    [Show full text]
  • For Enquiries on This Agenda Please Contact
    CHESHAM AND CHILTERN VILLAGES LOCAL AREA FORUM DATE: 3 July 2019 TIME: 7.00 pm Chartridge Village Hall, LOCATION: Chartridge Lane, HP5 2TW PARISH / TOWN COUNCIL DROP-IN FROM Xpm Come along to the drop-in and speak to your local representative from Transport for Buckinghamshire who will be on hand to answer your questions. AGENDA Item Page No 1 Apologies for Absence / Changes in Membership 2 Declarations of Interest To declare any personal and prejudicial interests 3 Minutes 3 - 6 To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 20 March 2019. 4 Petitions None received. 5 Question Time There will be a 20 minute period for public questions. Members of the public are encouraged to submit their questions in advance of the meeting to facilitate a full answer on the day of the meeting. Questions sent in advance will be dealt with first and verbal questions after. 6 Thames Valley Police Update To be presented by PS R Evans, Thames Valley Police. 7 Transport for Bucks Update 7 - 26 To be presented by Ms R Taylor, Area Manager, Transport for Bucks. 8 Fire Authority Update Verbal Update to be provided. 9 Unitary Update 27 - 30 To be presented by Mr T Ellis, Lead Area Officer, Bucks County Council. 10 Local Priorities Update/Impact Report 31 - 60 To be presented by Mr S Garwood, Local Area Forum Manager, Bucks County Council. 11 BCC Update To be presented by Mr T Ellis, Lead Area Officer, Bucks County Council. Visit democracy.buckscc.gov.uk for councillor information and email alerts for meetings, and decisions affecting your local area.
    [Show full text]
  • ADA3483: Dr Challoner's Grammar School Buckinghamshire
    DETERMINATION Case reference: ADA3483 Objector: A parent Admission Authority: The Academy Trust for Dr Challoner’s Grammar School Date of decision: 31 August 2018 Determination In accordance with section 88H(4) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, I partially uphold the objection to the admission arrangements determined by the academy trust for Dr Challoner’s Grammar School in Buckinghamshire for admissions in September 2019. By virtue of section 88K(2) the adjudicator’s decision is binding on the admission authority. The School Admissions Code requires the admission authority to revise its admission arrangements within two months of the date of this determination. The referral 1. Under section 88H(2) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, (the Act), an objection has been referred to the adjudicator by a parent whose identity is known to me, (the objector), about the admission arrangements (the arrangements) for Dr Challoner’s Grammar School (the school), a selective academy school for boys aged 11 to 18 in Amersham, Buckinghamshire for September 2019. The objection is to the school’s definition of “normal home address”, which is said to be objectively unreasonable and to operate unfairly. Jurisdiction 2. The terms of the academy agreement between the academy trust and the Secretary of State for Education require that the admissions policy and arrangements for the academy school are in accordance with admissions law as it applies to maintained schools. These arrangements were determined by the academy trust, which is the admission authority for the school, on that basis. The objectors submitted their objection to these determined arrangements on 10 May 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 105 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    105 bus time schedule & line map 105 Hemel Hempstead - Chesham - Amersham - View In Website Mode Uxbridge The 105 bus line (Hemel Hempstead - Chesham - Amersham - Uxbridge) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chesham: 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM (2) Uxbridge: 5:10 AM - 7:00 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 105 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 105 bus arriving. Direction: Chesham 105 bus Time Schedule 60 stops Chesham Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM York Road (W) Tuesday 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM Uxbridge High Street (A) High Street, Denham Civil Parish Wednesday 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM Oakside Thursday 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM Friday 6:13 AM - 7:50 PM Knighton Way Lane Saturday 7:43 AM - 7:50 PM Springbridge Nurseries Denham Avenue Mount Lane, Tatling End 105 bus Info Red Hill, Denham Civil Parish Direction: Chesham Stops: 60 Toby Carvery, Tatling End Trip Duration: 54 min Line Summary: York Road (W), Uxbridge High Street Pinstone Way, Tatling End (A), Oakside, Knighton Way Lane, Springbridge Nurseries, Denham Avenue, Mount Lane, Tatling End, Toby Carvery, Tatling End, Pinstone Way, Tatling End, Fulmer Lane, Tatling End Fulmer Lane, Tatling End, Heusden Way, Tatling End, Gaviots Close, Gerrards Cross, East Common, Heusden Way, Tatling End Gerrards Cross, Windsor Road, Gerrards Cross, The Packhorse Ph, Gerrards Cross, Railway Station, Gaviots Close, Gerrards Cross Gerrards Cross, South Park Crescent, Gerrards Cross, St Mary's School, Gerrards Cross, East Common,
    [Show full text]
  • Chiltern Councillor Update Economic Profile of Asheridge Vale & Lowndes Ward
    Chiltern Councillor Update Economic Profile of Asheridge Vale & Lowndes Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Asheridge Vale & Lowndes is home to 4,850 people and provides 1,000 jobs in 82 businesses. Of these businesses, 33 (40.2 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 3,438 employed people aged 16-74 living in Ash ridge Vale & Lowndes ward at the 2011 Census, 256 more than the 3,182 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population rose 195 to 2,996 while the total population rose 351 to 4,850. The number of households rose by 207 (12.1 per cent) to 1,919. This is the highest percentage increase out of all wards in Chiltern. Based on the increase in number of households, the ward ranks 16th out of all wards in Buckinghamshire. The largest companies in Asheridge Vale & Lowndes include: Axwell Wireless; Broadway Bowls Club; Chesham Park Community College; Survex Ltd; Draycast Foundries Ltd; Elmtree Country First School; and Martec Europe Ltd. There are 63 Asheridge Vale & Lowndes, representing 2.2 per cent of working age residents, including 30 claimants aged 25-49 and 15 who have been claiming for more than twelve months. Superfast broadband is expected to be available to 98 per cent of premises in the Asheridge Vale & Lowndes ward by March 2016 with commercial providers responsible for the full 98 per cent. The Connected Counties project, run by BBF, will deliver nothing to this particular ward due to the high proportion of fibre availability through commercial providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 8: Academy Trusts Consolidated Into SARA 2016 to 17
    Annex 8 – Academy Trusts consolidated into SARA 2016/17 Company Number Academy Trust Name 10817580 1Excellence Multi Academy Trust 7318714 Abbey Academies Trust 7740516 Abbey College, Ramsey 7705552 Abbey Multi Academy Trust 8484553 Abbots Hall Primary Academy 7931886 Abingdon Learning Trust 9912859 Abney Trust 7820566 Abraham Guest Academy Trust 6625091 Academies Enterprise Trust 8349962 Academies of Inspiration 8360915 Academy @ Worden 6269025 Academy 360 7846852 Academy Transformation Trust 7484308 Accord Multi Academy Trust 7728029 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School 8681270 Ace Learning 10038640 ACE Schools Multi Academy Trust 8158718 Acer Learning Trust 9591931 Acer Trust 7678864 Achievement Through Collaboration Trust 8169571 Acle Academy 8424090 Acocks Green Primary School 8418341 Acorn Academy Cornwall 7654902 Acorn Education Trust 9253218 Acorn Multi Academy Trust 8638158 Acorn Trust 8707909 Activate Learning Education Trust 7650619 Active Education Academy Trust 9308398 AD Astra Academy Trust 10270029 Ad Meliora Academy Trust 7928558 Advance Learning Partnership 8414933 Advance Trust 7337888 Advantage Schools 8614382 Adventure Learning Academy Trust Page | 1 of 85 8117759 Affinity Multi Academy Trust 4389132 AIM Academies Trust 8842629 Aim High Academy Trust 7556117 Airedale Academies Trust 8628019 Akaal Academy Trust Derby Limited 8334743 Akaal Education Trust 7681848 Alameda Middle School 7523557 Alban Academies Trust 7644208 Alban City Free School Ltd 8123168 Albany Learning Trust 7700251 Alcester Academy
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Education, School Sport and Club Links Strategy the School Sport Partnerships Programme Support for Gifted and Talented Pupils in Physical Education
    The physical education, school sport and club links strategy The school sport partnerships programme Support for gifted and talented pupils in physical education Age group Published Reference no. Primary and secondary July 2005 HMI 2397 © Crown copyright 2005 Document reference number: HMI 2397 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. The physical education, school sport and club links strategy Contents Executive summary 1 Key findings 2 Recommendations 4 Implementing the national strategy for physical education 5 The School Sport Partnerships Programme 6 Provision for Gifted and Talented Pupils in Physical Education 19 Notes 28 Further information 29 Annex. Schools visited 30 The physical education, school sport and club links strategy 1 Executive summary The report evaluates the impact of the national strategy for Physical Education, School Sport and Club Links (PESSCL) which is run by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). The overall objective of the strategy, a Public Service Agreement target held jointly by the two departments, is to increase the percentage of 5- to 16-year-old school children in England who spend a minimum of two hours each week on high quality physical education (PE) and school sport within and beyond the curriculum to 75% by 2006 and to 85% by 2008. The strategy is based on eight programmes of work. This report focuses on two: School Sport Partnerships and Support for Gifted and Talented Young Athletes in Specialist Sports Colleges.1 The School Sport Partnerships programme (originally called the School Sport Coordinator programme) was launched in September 2000.
    [Show full text]