DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biological Assessment/Evaluation For Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plant Species Klamath National Forest PROJECT NAME: Motorized Travel Management Prepared by: /s/ Kat Carsey Date: October 5, 2009 Kat Carsey Botanist Teams Enterprise Group Reviewed by: /s/ Marla Knight Date: November 2, 2009 Marla Knight Botanist Klamath National Forest Approved by: /s/ Patricia Grantham Date: November 13, 2009 Patricia Grantham Forest Supervisor Klamath National Forest I. Introduction The purpose of this document is to evaluate the Motorized Travel Management Project in sufficient detail to determine its effects on Endangered, Threatened, Proposed, Candidate, or Sensitive plant species. This Biological Assessment/Evaluation (BA/BE) is prepared in accordance with the legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act [19 U.S.C. 1536 (c)], and follows the standards established in the Forest Service Manual direction (USDA Forest Service 1997). Location Information The project area includes the entire Klamath National Forest (KNF) located mostly in northern California with a small portion in Jackson County, Oregon. Species of Concern Threatened, Endangered, Candidate The USFWS was contacted on October 16, 2008 for a list of federally listed, proposed, and candidate species. The following species are listed or candidates for listing and occur in the vicinity of the KNF . This BA addresses these species: Federal Endangered Arabis macdonaldiana McDonald’s rock-cress Federal Endangered Astragalus applegatei Applegate’s milk-vetch Federal Candidate Calochortus persistens Siskiyou Mariposa lily Federal Endangered Fritillaria gentneri Gentner mission-bells Federal Endangered Phlox hirsuta Yreka phlox Arabis macdonaldiana occurs in the outer North Coastal Ranges where no routes are proposed by this project. Astragalus applegatei and Fritillaria gentneri have not been found on the KNF. Phlox hirsuta is covered by the Route Designation Design Criteria letter of concurrence from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS 2007a). By following the recommended design criteria, route designation will meet the ―No Effect‖ or ―Not likely to adversely affect‖ determinations. Forests may tier to this consultation with no further consultation. Criteria for Phlox hirsuta are: No routes occur within 500 feet of occupied habitat. Designated routes or areas within ½ mile of occupied habitat will be monitored annually to determine whether noxious weed species have become established. Page 2 of 37 Motorized Travel Management Biological Assessment/Evaluation for Plants Treat designated routes or areas, where weeds have been introduced, to remove these weeds so their establishment in occupied habitat is prevented. There are no proposed routes within 500 feet of occupied habitat for federally listed species in any of the alternatives. Known sites are regularly monitored and weeds treated. No federally listed threatened, endangered, or proposed plant species will be affected by this project and are not considered further in this analysis. Federal candidate species There is currently one candidate for federal listing considered in the analysis on the KNF: Calochortus persistens. Calochortus persistens is not covered by the Route Designation Design Criteria letter of concurrence from the USFWS (2007a). There is one route within 30 feet of a C. persistens occurrence in Alternatives 1 and 2. Informal consultation was conducted by telephone and email with the USFWS on April 10, 2009 and April 16, 2009. The decision was made to drop this route from other action alternatives, so no additional consultation was conducted. The C. persistens special management area where this site occurs is closed to off-road travel by a Forest Order. The Order will remain in effect even if Alternative 1 is selected, so there will be no impacts to this species from motorized travel under any alternative. Effects to C. persistens were analyzed for Alternatives 1 and 2; there are no impacts from any other action alternative. Sensitive species The Region 5 Regional Forester has listed plants for which there is a concern for species viability as Sensitive. plants; they are those species which may occur in few to large numbers in a small localized area, or which may occur in a wide geographical area but in few numbers in restricted specialized habitats. Fifty-five Sensitive plant species are known, or thought possibly to occur on Klamath National Forest (KNF 2008). This BE addresses those species. Only those species of concern that have potentially suitable habitat or documented occurrences in areas that may be affected by the proposed project are discussed in this document. These areas include all activities discussed in the proposed action. A preliminary botanical review was done to determine the species of concern. Preliminary Botanical Review An office prefield review and a preliminary field review were conducted to determine if this project is within the range of any Klamath listed Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, or Sensitive species, and if suitable habitat is present within the proposed project area. All Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Sensitive species listed for the Klamath National Forest were considered during this review. Species for which suitable habitat is not present and for which the project area is outside of the currently known range of the species will not be considered beyond the preliminary review.. Page 3 of 37 Motorized Travel Management Biological Assessment/Evaluation for Plants The proposed project area was determined to contain documented occurrences or suitable habitat for the species listed in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1. Documented occurrences within 500 feet of unauthorized or proposed routes Species Code Status Alternatives Calochortus greenei CAGR R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Calochortus persistens CAPE R-5 Sensitive / C* 5-6 Cypripedium montanum CYMO2 R-5 Sensitive 1 Eriogonum hirtellum ERHI7 R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Helodium blandowii HEBL2 R-5 Sensitive 1-2 Horkelia hendersonii HOHE2 R-5 Sensitive 1 Meesia triquetra METR70 R-5 Sensitive 1-2 Meesia uliginosa MEUL70 R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Mimulus evanescens MIEV R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Phacelia cookei PHCO20 R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Ptilidium californicum PTCA5 R-5 Sensitive 1 Rorippa columbiae ROCO3 R-5 Sensitive 1-2-5-6 Thermopsis robusta THRO4 R-5 Sensitive 1-5-6 *Candidate for Federal listing Table 2. Species with suitable habitat in the project area Species Code Status Chaenactis suffrutescens CHSU R-5 Sensitive Cypripedium fasciculatum CYFA R-5 Sensitive Draba carnosula DRCA6 R-5 Sensitive Eriogonum alpinum ERAL6 R-5 Sensitive Ivesia pickeringii IVPI R-5 Sensitive Lupinus lepidus var. ashlandensis LULEA5 R-5 Sensitive Minuartia stolonifera MIST9 R-5 Sensitive Pedicularis howellii PEHO R-5 Sensitive Phacelia greenei PHGR2 R-5 Sensitive Phaeocollybia olivacea PHOL R-5 Sensitive Raillardella pringlei RAPR R-5 Sensitive Smilax jamesii SMJA R-5 Sensitive Tauschia howellii TAHO2 R-5 Sensitive Page 4 of 37 Motorized Travel Management Biological Assessment/Evaluation for Plants II. Current Management Direction (USDA Forest Service 1997, 2672.41): Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and Forest Service Policy (USDA Forest Service 1997, 2670) direct Federal agencies to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or permitted by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of 1) species listed, or proposed to be listed, as Endangered or Threatened (T&E) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 2) species listed as Sensitive by the Region 5 Regional Forester, or to cause a trend to federal listing for species listed as Sensitive. (USDA. 1990) The Klamath National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) lists forest-wide standards and guidelines that direct the management of Sensitive plant species to ensure the maintenance of reproducing, self-sustaining populations, and to prevent the need for the species to become listed as T&E species (USDA Forest Service 1995). Consultation to Date: Informal consultation was conducted by telephone and email with the USFWS on April 10, 2009 and April 16, 2009 for one route near a species that is a candidate for listing. The decision was made to drop the route from action alternatives (except Alternative 2). No additional consultation was needed. III. Description of Proposed Action This proposal suggests changes (vehicle class restrictions, additional motorized routes, opening closed routes, etc) to the Klamath National Forest Transportation Sysytem (NFTS) roads, NFTS trails, and /or areas on National Forest Sysytem (NFS) lands in accordance with the 2005 Travel Management Rule at 36 CFR Part 212, Subpart B. In accordance with Subpart B of the Travel management Rule (36 CFR Part 212.56), following a decision on this proposal, the KNF will publish a motor vehicle use map (MVUM) identifying all KNF NFTS roads, trails, and areas that are designated for motor vehicle use. The proposal includes six alternatives, described below. The proposed action is designed to maintain or improve trends in vegetation, watershed conditions, and in ecological sustainability relative to motorized vehicle use within the project area. Chapter 2 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) presents a more detailed description of the proposed action and the need for action. The proposed action and alternatives are described below. Page 5 of 37 Motorized Travel Management Biological Assessment/Evaluation for Plants IV. Existing Environment
Recommended publications
  • Carolyn's Crown/Shafer Creek Research

    Carolyn's Crown/Shafer Creek Research

    United States Department of Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Guidebook Supplement 28 Report PNW-GTR-600 December 2003 Reid Schuller Author Reid Schuller is a plant ecologist and executive director of the Natural Areas Association, P.O. Box 1504, Bend, OR 97709. The PNW Research Station is publishing this guidebook as part of a continuing series of guidebooks on federal research natural areas begun in 1972. Abstract Schuller, Reid. 2003. Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area: guidebook supplement 28. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-600. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p. This guidebook describes the Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area, a 323-ha (798-ac) tract of coniferous forest containing stands of 600- to 900-year-old old- growth Douglas-fir along the transition between the western hemlock zone and the silver fir zone in the Cascade Range in western Oregon. Keywords: Research natural area, old-growth forest, west-side Cascade Range of Oregon. Preface The research natural area (RNA) described in this supplement1 is administered by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management RNAs are located within districts, which are administrative subdivisions of state offices. Normal management and protective activities are the responsibility of district managers. Scientists and educators wishing to use one of the tracts for scientific or educational purposes should contact the appropriate district office field manager and provide information about research or educational objectives, sampling procedures, and other prospective activities.
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
  • Vegetative Ecology of a Montane Mire, Crater Lake National

    Vegetative Ecology of a Montane Mire, Crater Lake National

    AJ ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Susan Cornelia Seyer for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on December 14, 1979 Title: VEGETATIVE ECOLOGY OF A MONTANE MIRE, CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK, OREGON Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Jerry F. Franklin Mires, or peat-producing ecosystems, dominated by sedges, shrubs, and brown mosses, are common features in Cascade subalpine regions, occurring where moisture accumulates in small basins or on poorly-drained slopes. Although descriptions and classifications have been developed for mire vegetation in much of the world, there is little information of even a descriptive nature for these montane mires in Oregon and Washington. This thesis reports on phytosocia- logical structure, env'ironental relations, and successional trends in one such mire in the Oregon Cascade mountains. To characterize the general phytosociological structure of the mire vegetation at Sphagnum Bog, Crater Lake National Park, quantitative species cover data were used in conjunction with a Braun-Blanquet tabular analysis and two-dimensional stand ordinations, reciprocal averaging and a Bray-Curtis polar ordination. Defined community types correspond to physiognomic types as follows: Carex rostrata (reedswamp); Eleocharis pauciflora-Carex limosa, Eleocharis pauciflora/bryophytes (low sedge fens); Carex sichensis (tall sedge fen); Vaccinium/ Aulacomnium palustre, Vaccinium occidentala/Carex sitchensis (shrub thickets; Alnus incana/Brachythacium sp. and Salix barclayi (marginal carrs).Phases were defined when appropriate. A vegetation map was made to illustrate the locations and extent of the variouscommunities. Comparisons with other montane mires in thearea determined that the physiognomic units defined are repeatable when appropriate habitat conditions are present, and that they usually includemany of the same characteristic species, the dominant mosses being particularly constant.
  • Bryophyte Surveys 2009

    Bryophyte Surveys 2009

    Interagency Special Status Species Program Survey of Large Meadow Complexes for Sensitive Bryophyte and Fungal Species in the Northern Willamette National Forest Chris Wagner Willamette National Forest Detroit Ranger District District Botanist October 2011 1 Table of contents Introduction / Project Description……………………………………………………………..3 Sites Surveyed and Survey Results……………………………………………………………..4 Meadows, Information, Results…………………………………………………………………..9 Potential Future Survey Work………………………………………………………………………………14 References……………………………………………………………………………………….….…...15 ATTACHMENT 1: Regional Forester’s Special Status Species List for the Willamette National Forest (Revised 2008)……....................…………..16 2 Introduction Surveys were completed in 2010 and 2011 for large meadow complexes in the northern districts of the Willamette National Forest to determine whether any sensitive species of bryophytes or fungi are present. The type of habitat was also determined to clarify whether the habitat is a wet or dry meadow, bog or fen. Bryophyte identification was begun in 2010 with the first specimens collected and continued on through 2011 when most priority bryophytes were identified. The meadows selected represent the highest probability habitat for wetland bryophytes and fungi on Detroit and Sweet Home Ranger Districts. Some of these meadows may have been surveyed for vascular plant species in the past, but there are many new non-vascular sensitive species on the Willamette NF 2008 sensitive species list (see attachment 1) and additional species being being added to the proposed 2012 Regional Forester’s sensitive species list (unpublished). Meadows surveyed on the Detroit Ranger District included: Tule Lake meadow complex, Twin Meadows, Marion Lake meadow complex, Jo Jo Lake site, Wild Cheat Meadows, Bruno Meadows, Pigeon Prairie Meadow complex and Big Meadows. On the Sweet Home Ranger District Gordon Lake Meadows Complex was surveyed.
  • 2.10 Meesia Longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II

    2.10 Meesia Longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II

    2.10 Meesia longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II KLAUS WEDDELING, GERHARD LUDWIG & MONIKA HACHTEL, Bonn Namen: D: Langstieliges Schwanenhalsmoos, Langstieliges Meesemoos, Gestreckte Langborste E: Long-stalked Thread Moss, Long-shafted Swan Moss, F: – Systematik/Taxonomie: Bryophyta, Bryopsida, Bryidae, Splachnales, Meesiaceae. Synonyme: Amblyodon longisetus (HEDW.) P. BEAUV. Kennzeichen/Artbestimmung: Meesia longiseta ist ein 4–8 (–10) cm hohes, akrokarpes, unverzweigtes Laubmoos von grün-schwärzlicher Färbung. Die Art wächst in lockeren, weichen Rasen (Abb. 2.9). Das Stämmchen ist bis in die Spitze wurzelhaarig und im Moose Querschnitt dreikantig. Die Blättchen sind mehr oder weniger deutlich in 3 oder 6 Rei- hen angeordnet und vom Stämmchen abgespreizt. Die 2–3,5 mm langen, spitzen Blätt- chen laufen deutlich am Stämmchen herab, sind oberwärts gekielt, ganzrandig oder an der Spitze etwas gezähnt. Ihre deutlich entwickelte Rippe endet unterhalb der Blattspitze. Der Blattrand ist flach. Die Laminazellen sind rechteckig bis rhombisch und etwa 14 µm breit. Die rötlichen, gedrehten Seten der synözischen Art können über 10 cm lang wer- den. Die langbirnenförmige, aufrechte Kapsel hat einen deutlichen Hals. Bei der Spo- renreife im Juni und Juli werden die mit 36–44 µm Durchmesser recht großen Sporen frei- gesetzt. Die Chromosomenzahl ist nicht bekannt (FRITSCH 1991). Differenzierende Merkmale zu den ähnlichen Arten Meesia uliginosa und M. hexasticha sind der nicht ein- gerollte Blattrand, die kleineren Sporen und der Rippenquerschnitt mit kleinen, inneren Zellen (zusammengestellt nach CRUM & ANDERSON 1981, FRAHM 1979, LIMPRICHT 1895). Abbildungen der Art finden sich bei CRUM & ANDERSON (1981, Fig. 296, 297, S. 628, 629: Blättchen, Blattspitze, Habitus, Kapsel) und FRAHM (1979, Fig.
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium

    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium

    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
  • USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Sensitive Plant Species by Forest

    USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Sensitive Plant Species by Forest

    USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region 1 Sensitive Plant Species by Forest 2013 FS R5 RF Plant Species List Klamath NF Mendocino NF Shasta-Trinity NF NF Rivers Six Lassen NF Modoc NF Plumas NF EldoradoNF Inyo NF LTBMU Tahoe NF Sequoia NF Sierra NF Stanislaus NF Angeles NF Cleveland NF Los Padres NF San Bernardino NF Scientific Name (Common Name) Abies bracteata (Santa Lucia fir) X Abronia alpina (alpine sand verbena) X Abronia nana ssp. covillei (Coville's dwarf abronia) X X Abronia villosa var. aurita (chaparral sand verbena) X X Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (Abrams' flowery puncturebract) X X Acanthoscyphus parishii var. cienegensis (Cienega Seca flowery puncturebract) X Agrostis hooveri (Hoover's bentgrass) X Allium hickmanii (Hickman's onion) X Allium howellii var. clokeyi (Mt. Pinos onion) X Allium jepsonii (Jepson's onion) X X Allium marvinii (Yucaipa onion) X Allium tribracteatum (three-bracted onion) X X Allium yosemitense (Yosemite onion) X X Anisocarpus scabridus (scabrid alpine tarplant) X X X Antennaria marginata (white-margined everlasting) X Antirrhinum subcordatum (dimorphic snapdragon) X Arabis rigidissima var. demota (Carson Range rock cress) X X Arctostaphylos cruzensis (Arroyo de la Cruz manzanita) X Arctostaphylos edmundsii (Little Sur manzanita) X Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. gabrielensis (San Gabriel manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos hooveri (Hoover's manzanita) X Arctostaphylos luciana (Santa Lucia manzanita) X Arctostaphylos nissenana (Nissenan manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos obispoensis (Bishop manzanita) X Arctostphylos parryana subsp. tumescens (interior manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos pilosula (Santa Margarita manzanita) X Arctostaphylos rainbowensis (rainbow manzanita) X Arctostaphylos refugioensis (Refugio manzanita) X Arenaria lanuginosa ssp. saxosa (rock sandwort) X Astragalus anxius (Ash Valley milk-vetch) X Astragalus bernardinus (San Bernardino milk-vetch) X Astragalus bicristatus (crested milk-vetch) X X Pacific Southwest Region, Regional Forester's Sensitive Species List.
  • 39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985

    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985

    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion).
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests

    A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests

    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
  • Action C.5 Milestone: Bryophyte Ex Situ Conservation Scheme Feb 2017

    Action C.5 Milestone: Bryophyte Ex Situ Conservation Scheme Feb 2017

    ESCAPE – UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Action C.5 Milestone Bryophyte ex situ conservation scheme Sanna Laaka-Lindberg & Xiaolan He 2/28/2017 Monitoring Meesia longiseta reintroduction site in 2016. Photo: Sanna Laaka-Lindberg An ex situ conservation scheme is presented on the basis of compiled results of the ESCAPE project as a model for bryophyte conservation. ESCAPE LIFE+2011 BIO/FI/917 Action C.5 Milestone Bryophyte ex situ conservation scheme Introduction Ex situ conservation is a species conservation method used as a compliment to the primary conservation tool in situ conservation, a process of protecting an endangered species in its natural habitat. Ex situ conservation is targeted to species in most serious threat, especially when the conservation measures in nature are not adequate for species survival. There are basically two different types of ex situ conservation tools: 1) tools aimed at storing and securing the species and its genetic variation e.g. on national or even on wider (global) level, and 2) tools aimed at increasing species survival ability in nature. The ultimate goal of ex situ conservation is to provide support for the survival of species in their natural environments. Conservation of biodiversity is a continuous and long-term assignment, so the decisions on ex situ conservation to a species need to be made on a solid basis. This involves thorough investigation on conservation priorities, background knowledge of the biology and ecology of the species to be conserved, and the feasibility of the conservation plan. In the ESCAPE project, a priority list was compiled for vascular plants (see Ryttäri 2013), but no such list is made for bryophytes.
  • CBD First National Report

    CBD First National Report

    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
  • Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report

    Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report

    Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3g. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-45 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-46 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3h. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-47 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-48 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3i. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-49 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-50 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3j. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-51 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-52 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment 1 Valley Oak Woodland This habitat type consists of an open savanna of 2 valley oak (Quercus lobata) trees and an annual grassland understory. Valley 3 oak is typically the only tree species present and shrubs are generally absent 4 except for occasional poison oak. Canopy cover rarely exceeds 30–40 percent in 5 valley oak woodland. This community occupies the highest portions of the 6 floodplain terrace where flooding is infrequent and shallow.