The social contradictions of organised crime on the Cape Flats1
André Standing Institute for Security Studies
ISS Paper 74 • June 2003
Price: R10.00
he starting point for this paper was the realisation have been neglected by both capital and the state, the Tthat certain prominent members of organised crime criminal economy can develop social dimensions. on the Cape Flats receive a significant degree of Organised crime may represent a rational response of community support. On the surface, this survival and resistance. Thus, in order to contradicts the orthodox depiction of explore the impact of organised crime, one organised crime as being an anti-social and needs to appreciate how the anti-social loathsome phenomena—in mainstream Organised dimension of organised crime both co- publications and commentary, provided by crime may exists with, as well as relies upon, its social academia, law enforcement and politicians, aspects. organised crime is portrayed as a corrupt represent a external force akin to a social virus . For rational THE CRIMINAL ECONOMY example, at the opening of the United Nations conference on the Convention on response of OF THE CAPE FLATS Transnational Organised Crime in 2001, survival and Cape Town provides one of the most vivid Kofi Annan famously described organised examples of urban crisis attributed to late crime as ‘uncivil society’, an evil force that resistance modern capitalism. It is a city of stark undoes the ‘good works of civil society’.2 contrasts and social fragmentation—built In response to this apparent contradiction, the broad first on the policies of apartheid