Appendix II – Stakeholder Meetings: List of Invitees
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Evolution of Maori Society, 1984- 2004
PAUL MOON A Chequered Renaissance: The Evolution of Maori Society, 1984- 2004 Introduction In the wake of Labour’s euphoric victory in the 1984 General Election, two conferences were swiftly organised by the new Government. The first was an economic summit that took place in September of that year. It sought to proclaim a new period of prosperity for the country – one which would be achieved primarily by means of an extensive liberalisation of the economy. The following month, the Hui Taumata was convened by the Minister of Maori Affairs, Koro Wetere. It was a summit of Maori leaders that its organisers hoped would herald a period of vigorous and substantial progress for Maori. Not since the height of the Kotahitanga movement in the 1890s had so many hapu and iwi representatives gathered together with the intent to foster Maori development in such a concerted manner. The overriding emphasis of the 1984 Hui Taumata was on the need for significantly increased Maori access to and management of resources. Maori – according to Prime Minister David Lange at the opening of the Hui – were to be the authors of their own subsequent development. 1 This emphasis on greater Maori self-determination and development, though, was not merely a spontaneous gesture on behalf of the Government. It was as much a reaction to the culmination of forces for change that had been building up for at least a decade. Its immediate paternity included the rise of activist groups such as Nga Tamatoa in the early 1970s, increased Maori politicisation in general, the inception of the Waitangi Tribunal in 1975, a growing Maori population, and the emergence of a strong and articulate Maori intelligentsia. -
Inside a Voice for Mäori Surveying Adolescents
The University of Auckland News for Staff Vol 44 / Issue 04 / JUNE 2014 GRADUATION ■ PAGE 5 It was a proud day for the Mead family (Alistair, Amber, Heather and Alex Lovell) at Autumn Graduation. Read their story and others on page 5. INSIDE A VOICE FOR MÄORI SURVEYING ADOLESCENTS INDIGENOUS FOOD Jim Peters grew up the eldest of 11 children The Adolescent Health Research Group at the PRACTICES [Winston Peters MP for New Zealand First] was University has been studying the health and “Relationships between indigenous people one of his younger brothers] on the coast at wellbeing of young people in New Zealand and their knowledge, and commercial food Whananaki, north of Whangarei on a small since 2000. During this time it has surveyed producers around the world, need to include dairy farm. Read how he has journeyed from more than 30,000 young people between respect and acceptance,” argues Mariaelena that beginning via a suc cessful teaching the ages of 12 and 20 years in secondary Huambachano, a PhD student with the career, and a stint in Parliament, to become schools from all over New Zealand; surveyed Business School. “For New Zealand, the issues the University’s Pro Vice-Chancellor Māori students in Alternative Education settings and of food security and sovereignty are extremely today. Teen Parent units and surveyed students in important and, if we address them properly, Wharekura (Māori Immersion schools). we could elevate even more our green and safe Read about the findings. food reputation in global markets.” ■ PAGE 6 ■ PAGE 9 ■ PAGE 12 SNAPSHOT CONTENTS KA MATE KA ORA WHAT’S NEW ................................... -
IMPORTANT NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry
IMPORTANT NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour is trying to decimate the NZ Health Products Industry Labour is trying to decimate the NZ Health Products Industry The Labour Government is trying to change the way in which all Natural Health Products (NHPs) The Labour Government is trying to change the way in which all Natural Health Products (NHPs) & medical devices are regulated. They plan to treat them as medicines and give the power to & medical devices are regulated. They plan to treat them as medicines and give the power to control them to the controversial Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) control them to the controversial Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) We know from the Australian experience that this would mean; We know from the Australian experience that this would mean; • Fewer products available - consumer choice reduced • Fewer products available - consumer choice reduced • Unnecessary bureaucracy and cost • Unnecessary bureaucracy and cost • Increased cost to consumers • Increased cost to consumers • Natural health products & medical devices all controlled like drugs • Natural health products & medical devices all controlled like drugs • Many NZ businesses forced to close - jobs lost • Many NZ businesses forced to close - jobs lost • There will be little NZ can do to protect itself – Australia would make decisions for NZ • There will be little NZ can do to protect itself – Australia would make decisions for NZ The Australian TGA (which would take over NZ’s health products industry) is known to use an The Australian TGA (which would take over NZ’s health products industry) is known to use an extremely heavy-handed approach. -
New Zealand First: Parallels Between the Man and the Party Margaret Joiner Department of Political Studies University of Auckland ([email protected])
New Zealand First: parallels between the man and the party Margaret Joiner Department of Political Studies University of Auckland ([email protected]) Paper prepared for the New Zealand Political Studies Association Conference, University of Auckland, Auckland, 30 November-1 December 20091 Abstract: This paper will address the likelihood of the New Zealand First party returning to parliament at the 2011 General Election. Following fifteen years in parliament, in 2008 New Zealand First failed to reach the five-per cent threshold, or to secure an electorate seat. With a few exceptions, notably the Social Credit/Democratic party (1953-1987), small parties in New Zealand have tended to come and go and are rarely long-term movements. By focusing on the emergence and decline of New Zealand First, this paper engages with the wider study of New Zealand’s modern party system, specifically the phenomenon of the limited lifespan of small parties, and the notion advanced by a number of scholars that parties are profoundly influenced by their origins (Downs 1957; Duverger 1959; Rawson 1969; Panebianco 1988; Jaensch 1994; Hug 2001). This paper posits that New Zealand First emerged primarily as a political vehicle for the frustrated ambition of its mercurial leader, Winston Peters. Parallels have been identified between the man and the party as it progressed through an oscillating pattern of success and failure, thereby confirming that Peters continues to be the personification of the movement. While political parties tend to rejuvenate following electoral downturn, which typically involves leadership change, the findings here question the effectiveness of such a strategy for a party so reliant on its leader for voter identification. -
Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD)
First Session, Forty-seventh Parliament, 2002-2003 Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD) Wednesday, 25 June 2003 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2003 ISSN 0114-992 X WEDNESDAY, 25 JUNE 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPEAKER’S RULINGS— Independent—Disclosure of Correspondence with Speaker .............................6543 TABLING OF DOCUMENTS— Prostitution Reform Bill.....................................................................................6543 MOTIONS— Dr John Hood.....................................................................................................6543 SPEAKER’S RULINGS— Responses to Oral Questions .............................................................................6544 QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWER— Questions to Ministers— Myanmar—Aung San Suu Kyi.....................................................................6544 Foreshore and Seabed—Crown Ownership..................................................6545 Immigration—Cost to Taxpayers..................................................................6549 Justice, Associate Minister—Confidence .....................................................6551 Hazardous Substances—Regulation .............................................................6553 Genetic Modification—Sheep, PPL Therapeutics, Waikato.........................6553 Foreshore and Seabed—Crown Ownership..................................................6554 Whaling—International Whaling Commission ............................................6556 Defence -
Important Notice
IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour is trying to destroy the NZ Natural Health Industry The Labour Government is trying to change the way in which all Natural Health Products (NHPs) are regulated. They plan to treat NHPs as medicines and give the power to control them to the controversial Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA): We know from the Australian experience that this would mean; • Fewer Natural health products available - consumer choice reduced • Increased cost to consumers • Natural health products treated as drugs • Many NZ businesses forced to close - jobs lost • There will be little NZ can do to protect itself – Australia would make decisions for NZ The Australian TGA (which would take over NZ’s natural health industry) is known to use an extremely heavy-handed approach to supplements. Remember the Pan debacle? The TGA recalled 1200 natural products off the market on the strength of one manufacturer’s lax handling of quality control standards. “The truth is that of more than 1200 products recalled, NOT ONE of the natural health products was found to be at fault. It was only one pharmaceutical drug which was a problem”. Despite strong opposition from industry and a Parliamentary Select Committee report against the proposal, Annette King signed the Treaty with Australia on 10 December last year. But the battle is far from over. The Government still needs to have the treaty passed into law and for that it needs the support of the opposition parties. We can stop the Government’s TGA proposal especially if we are strong and united. The opposition party MP’s need to know the strength of public opposition.