DOCSLIB.ORG

Swarming Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Quadrotors – Swarm Behavior for Aggregation, Foraging, Formation, and Tracking –

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swarming Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Quadrotors – Swarm Behavior for Aggregation, Foraging, Formation, and Tracking – Swarming Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Quadrotors Paper: Swarming Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Quadrotors – Swarm Behavior for Aggregation, Foraging, Formation, and Tracking – Argel A. Bandala, Elmer P. Dadios, Ryan Rhay P. Vicerra, and Laurence A. Gan Lim De La Salle University, Manila 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila 1004, Philippines E-mail: {argel.bandala@dlsu., elmer.dadios@dlsu., [email protected]., laurence.ganlim@dlsu.}edu.ph [Received February 5, 2014; accepted May 3, 2014] This paper presents the fusion of swarm behavior in quite different when combining or creating conventional multi robotic system specifically the quadrotors un- robotic systems [2, 5]. There are a handful of researches manned aerial vehicle (QUAV) operations. This study that attempted to achieve swarm robotic principles [3, 4]. directed on using robot swarms because of its key fea- Mobile robots can be dispersed in remote and unknown ture of decentralized processing amongst its member. areas which later can organize their formation to assist This characteristic leads to advantages of robot opera- humans [6–9]. tions because an individual robot failure will not affect This paper exhibits the compatibility of applying the group performance. The algorithm emulating the swarm algorithm on UAV quadrotors for aerial surveil- animal or insect swarm behaviors is presented in this lance, search and reconnaissance operations through flight paper and implemented into an artificial robotic agent formations and reconfiguration by abiding swarming pat- (QUAV) in computer simulations. The simulation re- terns and behavior. The endeavor to achieve this is enu- sults concluded that for increasing number of QUAV merated in this paper as follows. Section 1 introduced the aggregation accuracy increases with an accuracy the current trends and researchers that involve swarm in- of 90.62%. The experiment for foraging revealed that telligence and robotics. Section 2 enumerates the swarm the number of QUAV does not affect the accuracy of behaviors that this paper tackles and how does these be- the swarm instead the iterations needed are greatly haviors differ from one another. Section 3 relates swarm improved with an average of 160.53 iterations from 50 behavior into artificial systems specifically QUAVs and to 500 QUAV. For swarm tracking, the average accu- presents methodologies to incorporate these behavior to racy is 89.23%. The accuracy of the swarm forma- robots. Section 4 discusses the appearance, design and tion is 84.65%. These results clearly defined that the algorithms in the simulation environment. Section 5 swarm system is accurate enough to perform the tasks presents the results of the experiment done for every be- and robust in any QUAV number. havior. Section 6 presents the interpretation of the data from Section 5 and suggests some recommendation for future works. Keywords: swarm robotics, swarm intelligence, social behaviors, unmanned aerial vehicles 2. Swarm Behaviors and Motivation of Swarm Intelligence 1. Introduction Generally all existing works related to swarm intelli- The field of robotics specifically mobile robotics is di- gence were derived from the group or social behavior of rected towards the use of multiple robots in accomplishing animals or insects [1, 2]. These animals are naturally dis- tasks [1, 2]. The nature of these algorithms enables the de- organized and solely depends on the actions that other signer to create simple robots which is generally cheaper individual exhibits. Based on local communication with and less complex compared to a single robot [1, 2]. The nearby swarm members and the actions that they do, an algorithms used to test the intelligence of the multiple individual can evaluate and later generate an appropriate robotic systems are customarily from the idea of using behavior that will contribute to the group’s objective. All or mimicking animal behavior [1–3]. The algorithms of the members of the swarm are considered as data har- that utilize this, is collectively referred to as swarm al- vester from the environment, thus any ongoing activity of gorithms [1, 4]. an individual can immediately influenced by the environ- The fusion of swarm algorithm into robotic systems is ment. Vol.18 No.5, 2014 Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence 745 and Intelligent Informatics Bandala,A.A.etal. 2.1. Aggregation may track a target and continuously reconfigure its for- The most basic of all the swarming behavior is aggre- mation to avoid the tracked target which further enables gation [3]. Aggregation is the ability of the swarm to the swarm to avoid obstacles along the trajectory [3, 10]. work together and gather or organize itself in one specific location and avoiding collision with other swarm mem- bers [1, 3]. Thus, Aggregation is one behavior that can- 3. Robot Swarm Algorithms and its Implemen- not be neglected in any robotic system. This behavior tation to QUAV establishes the ability of each individual to communicate or observe the action of one another since swarm mem- The robot swarm of QUAVs are considered to be in bers are in close distance with one another. Normally it the area of interest which operates in the bounded in n is combined with other swarming behavior to accomplish [3, 11]. The elements of the swarm is represented by goals [6, 9–11]. xi(t),wherei = 1,2,3,...,N, this representation repre- sents the status or state of every robot with quantity N t 2.2. Social Foraging with respect to time . The controlling function for every individual robot is represented by the function ui(t),and Another biological swarm behavior that is greatly for uniformity i = 1,2,3,...,N [3]. adopted in swarm robotics is foraging [3, 10, 12]. This behavior is a manifestation of aggregation. It is the col- 3.1. Aggregation lective reaction of the individuals base on the environ- The swarm with elements N robots with the follow- ment, thus the environment is a great factor in the be- ing conditions mentioned above, is ideally desired to con- havior as well as the swarm can greatly alter the envi- verge in a singular point or within the vicinity of a singular ronment [1, 13]. Here, the swarm is concerned primarily point until steady state t = ∞ is given by: in to two regions of the environment. These regions are lim xi(t) − x j(t) ≤ ε, ........ (1) the favorable regions and the danger regions [1, 3, 10, 13]. t→∞ Similarly the regions are analogous to food and predator regions, the favorable region is the area where food for where ε is the measure of the maximum swarm size. The the swarm is abundant while dangerous region is repre- functions xi(t) and x j(t) are input parameters in which sented by a region where a prey of the swarm is present i = 1,2,3,...,N and j = 1,2,3,...,N as defined in [3]. and needs to be avoided. 3.2. Social Foraging n → 2.3. Flight Formation Foraging can be described by mapping at any point i ∈n where σ(i) are points that can have three Flight formation is a manifestation of foraging process ranges of values. Generally σ(i) > 0, σ(i) < 0, or σ(i)= which is greatly described by creation of geometric con- 0 are the possible values for these points [3, 10]. These figuration of initially unorganized individuals [3, 14]. The points can represent the regions of interest in the area. convergence to an organized configuration is greatly chal- σ(i) is used to represent a point or an area with great in- lenged by the constraints of the movement of each indi- terest, or a point of avoidance or risk, or a neutral point vidual while maintaining the geometric configuration re- in the space. σ(i) > 0 is used to define an area in which quired by the scenario. Biological swarms usually utilize the swarm should avoid and will generate a higher proba- this ability for various reasons, the formation generated bility that a robot will not traverse towards this point. On by a group of birds are their means to avoid predator and the other hand σ(i) < 0 is a point of great interest and catching a prey. The most unique for these animals are most likely that the swarm of robots will traverse in this they use flight formation to conserve or lessen the energy direction. Likewise if σ(i)=0 a neutral point is present. or effort that an individual exert in flying. In the formation Therefore a favorable area of point in the space will be they use, the leader serves as the absorbent of the force so represented by these values. The more favorable the area that other members of the swarm do not experience the is the lesser its value and the area of less interest should same amount of force [2, 5, 15, 16]. have a greater value; lastly a neutral point should have a value of 0 [3]. 2.4. Swarm Tracking One manifestation of flight formation and aggregation 3.3. Flight Formation is swarm tracking [2, 3]. There are instances wherein a A manifestation of combining aggregation and forag- target, either a prey or predator simultaneously move and ing is flight formation. Mainly to create a stable flight interacts with the swarm. The said target may have the formation, the distances between swarm elements should objective to capture the swarm or evade the swarm [3]. be maintained while moving. Given the desired dis- In this case a special kind of behavior is employed; the tances, dij|i, j ∈{1,2,3,...,N},i = j flight formation swarm needs to maintain a formation while tracking the is achieved [3]. Steady state can be described by [3]: target.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Make Robots Be Bats: Specializing Robotic Swarms to the Bat Algorithm
    © <2019>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC- BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/ Accepted Manuscript Make robots Be Bats: Specializing robotic swarms to the Bat algorithm Patricia Suárez, Andrés Iglesias, Akemi Gálvez PII: S2210-6502(17)30633-8 DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.01.005 Reference: SWEVO 346 To appear in: Swarm and Evolutionary Computation BASE DATA Received Date: 24 July 2017 Revised Date: 20 November 2017 Accepted Date: 9 January 2018 Please cite this article as: P. Suárez, André. Iglesias, A. Gálvez, Make robots Be Bats: Specializing robotic swarms to the Bat algorithm, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation BASE DATA (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.01.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Make Robots Be Bats: Specializing Robotic Swarms to the Bat Algorithm Patricia Su´arez1, Andr´esIglesias1;2;:, Akemi G´alvez1;2 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Computational Sciences E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Cantabria Avda. de los Castros, s/n, 39005, Santander, SPAIN 2Department of Information Science, Faculty of Sciences Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama 274-8510, Funabashi, JAPAN :Corresponding author: [email protected] http://personales.unican.es/iglesias Abstract Bat algorithm is a powerful nature-inspired swarm intelligence method proposed by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants Meeting Algorithms
    Ants Meeting Algorithms Asaf Shiloni, Alon Levy Ariel Felner, Meir Kalech The MAVERICK Group Department of Information System Engineering Computer Science Department Deutsche Telekom Labs Bar-Ilan University, Israel Ben-Gurion University, Israel {asafshiloni,alonlevy1}@gmail.com {felner,kalech}@bgu.ac.il ABSTRACT Furthermore, ants were shown to be practical in real-world applica- Ant robots have very low computational power and limited memory. They tions. For example, the advantage of ants over convectional robots communicate by leaving pheromones in the environment. In order to create in practice is found in the micron-scale environments such as the a cooperative intelligent behavior, ants may need to get together; however, blood stream and other parts of the human body. The robots acting they may not know the locations of other ants. Hence, we focus on an ant in these environments cannot be equipped with abundant memory or high-end sensors, nor with high computational performance ca- variant of the rendezvous problem, in which two ants are to be brought to the same location in finite time. We introduce two algorithms that solve pabilities. Thus, only robots with light hardware capabilities must this problem for two ants by simulating a bidirectional search in different be used [5, 6]. environment settings. An algorithm for an environment with no obstacles Algorithms for ant robots often require cooperation between mul- and a general algorithm that handles all types of obstacles. We provide tiple ants. These algorithms usually assume that the ants start ex- detailed discussion on the different attributes, size of pheromone required, ecuting the algorithm while located at the same location, or in a and the performance of these algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Stigmergic Masa: a Stigmergy Based Algorithm 1479
    Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on DOI: 10.15439/2014F395 Computer Science and Information Systems pp. 1477–1485 ACSIS, Vol. 2 S-MASA: A Stigmergy Based Algorithm for Multi-Target Search Ouarda Zedadra and Hamid Seridi Nicolas Jouandeau Giancarlo Fortino LabSTIC Laboratory, 8 may 1945 University Advanced Computing laboratory DIMES, Universita’ P.O.Box 401, 24000 Guelma, Algeria of saint-Denis Paris 8 University della Calabria Department of computer science Badji Mokhtar Saint Denis 93526, France Via P. Bucci, cubo 41c - 87036 Annaba University P.O.Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria Email: [email protected] - Rende (CS) - Italy Email: zedadra nawel1, [email protected] Email:[email protected] Abstract—We explore the on-line problem of coverage where 1) it is of very low computational complexity, in which multiple agents have to find a target whose position is unknown, agents have a very low-range of sensors; and without a prior global information about the environment. 2) it executes a search in nearby locations first by adopting In this paper a novel algorithm for multi-target search is described, it is inspired from water vortex dynamics and based spiral turns around the starting cell and around agents on the principle of pheromone-based communication. Accord- each other; ing to this algorithm, called S-MASA (Stigmergic Multi Ant 3) agents use stigmergic communication via digital Search Area), the agents search nearby their base incrementally pheromone; using turns around their center and around each other, until 4) it can be executed on known or unknown static obstacle- the target is found, with only a group of simple distributed cooperative Ant like agents, which communicate indirectly via free environments or obstacle environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Ad-Hoc Formations for Autonomous Airport Snow Shoveling
    The 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems October 18-22, 2010, Taipei, Taiwan Control of ad-hoc formations for autonomous airport snow shoveling Martin Saska and Vojtechˇ Vonasek´ and Libor Preuˇ cilˇ Abstract— In this paper, we present a framework that applies example of decentralized cleaning algorithm is a method multiple groups of autonomous snowploughs for efficiently inspired by cooperative behavior of ants introduced in [10]. removing the snow from airfields. The proposed approach in- Projecting the problem of cooperative sweeping onto the cludes formation stabilization into variable shapes depending on the width of runways. The paper is focused on trajectory plan- airfield, the snow shoveling task generates some problems ning and control during splitting and coupling of formations that have not yet been solved. Our approach considers the for cleaning smaller auxiliary roads surrounding main runways. nonholonomic kinematics of usual snowploughs as well We propose a general method using a receding horizon control as the position and orientation of the ploughs’ shovels. for iterative formation assignment. The algorithm is adapted for Furthermore, the working space is more structured due to the kinematics of car-like robots and can be utilized in arbitrary static and dynamic airport assemblage. The proposed approach the airfield environment. has been verified by simulations and by hardware experiments. As was mentioned above, the safety requirements at the airport predestinates the utilization of autonomous forma- I. INTRODUCTION tions, which has not yet been investigated in terms of sweep- The main task of the ground staff at the airport is to ing. In the classical literature, formation driving approaches maintain airports’ operations safe and uninterrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Robot Ants and Elephants: a Computational Comparison
    Theoretical Computer Science 412 (2011) 5771–5788 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Theoretical Computer Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tcs Review Of robot ants and elephants: A computational comparison Asaf Shiloni ⇤, Noa Agmon, Gal A. Kaminka The MAVERICK Group, Computer Science Department, Bar Ilan University, Israel article info abstract Article history: In the robotics community, there exist implicit assumptions concerning the computational Received 19 July 2010 capabilities of robots. Two computational classes of robots emerge as focal points of recent Received in revised form 27 April 2011 research: robot ants and robot elephants. Ants have poor memory and communication Accepted 22 June 2011 capabilities, but are able to communicate using pheromones, in effect, turning their work Communicated by G. Ausiello area into a shared memory. By comparison, elephants are computationally stronger, have large memory, and are equipped with strong sensing and communication capabilities. Unfortunately, not much is known about the relation between the capabilities of these models in terms of the tasks they can address. In this paper, we present formal models of both ants and elephants, and investigate if one dominates the other. We present two algorithms: AntEater, which allows elephant robots to execute ant algorithms and ElephantGun, which converts elephant algorithms – specified as Turing machines – into ant algorithms. By exploring the computational capabilities of these algorithms, we reach interesting
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipating and Preparing for Emerging Skills and Jobs Key Issues, Concerns, and Prospects Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects
    Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects 55 Brajesh Panth Rupert Maclean Editors Anticipating and Preparing for Emerging Skills and Jobs Key Issues, Concerns, and Prospects Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects Volume 55 Series Editors Rupert Maclean, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Lorraine Pe Symaco, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Editorial Board Bob Adamson, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Robyn Baker, New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Wellington, New Zealand Michael Crossley, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Shanti Jagannathan, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines Yuto Kitamura, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Colin Power, Graduate School of Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Konai Helu Thaman, University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji Advisory Editors Mark Bray, UNESCO Chair, Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Yin Cheong Cheng, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China John Fien, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Pham Lan Huong, International Educational Research Centre, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Chong-Jae Lee, Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI), Seoul, Korea (Republic of) Naing Yee Mar, GIZ, Yangon, Myanmar Geoff Masters, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia Margarita Pavlova, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Max Walsh, Secondary Education Project, Manila, Philippines Uchita de Zoysa, Global Sustainability Solutions (GLOSS), Colombo, Sri Lanka The purpose of this Series is to meet the needs of those interested in an in-depth analysis of current developments in education and schooling in the vast and diverse Asia-Pacific Region. The Series will be invaluable for educational researchers, policy makers and practitioners, who want to better understand the major issues, concerns and prospects regarding educational developments in the Asia-Pacific region.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Cooperative Search of Smart Targets Using UAV Swarms
    Robotica (2008) volume 26, pp. 551–557. © 2008 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0263574708004141 Printed in the United Kingdom Efficient cooperative search of smart targets using UAV Swarms1 Yaniv Altshuler†∗, Vladimir Yanovsky†, Israel A. Wagner†‡ and Alfred M. Bruckstein† †Computer Science Department, Technion, Haifa 32000 Israel. ‡IBM Haifa Labs, MATAM, Haifa 31905 Israel. (Received in Final Form: January 2, 2008. First published online: February 18, 2008) SUMMARY economics applications, and refs. [24, 35] for physics- This work examines the Cooperative Hunters problem, inspired approaches). where a swarm of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) is used for Tasks that have been of particular interest to researchers searching one or more “evading targets,” which are moving in recent years include synergetic mission planning,8 fault in a predefined area while trying to avoid a detection by the tolerance,9 swarm control,10 human design of mission swarm. By arranging themselves into efficient geometric plans,11 role assignment,12 multi-robot path planning,13 flight configurations, the UAVs optimize their integrated traffic control,14 formation generation,15 formation keep- sensing capabilities, enabling the search of a maximal ing,16 exploration and mapping,17 cleaning18 and dynamic territory. cleaning19 and target tracking.26 Unfortunately, the mathematical geometrical theory of such multi-agent systems is far from being satisfactory, as KEYWORDS: Swarm Algorithm, Cooperative Search, pointed out in ref. [25] and many other papers. Shape Factor. One of the most interesting challenges for a robotics swarm system is the design and analysis of a multi-robotics system for searching areas (either known or unknown),27–31,34 or 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Swarm Intelligence — Searchers, Cleaners and Hunters
    Nadia Nedjah Luiza de Macedo Mourelle Swarm Intelligent Systems With 65 Figures and 34 Tables 123 Dr. Nadia Nedjah Department of Electronics Engineering and Telecommunications - DETEL Faculty of Engineering - FEN State University of Rio de Janeiro - UERJ Rua Sã o Franci s c o X a v i e r , 5 2 4 , 5 o. andar Maracanã , CEP 20559-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Luiza de Macedo Mourelle Department of System Engineering and Computation - DESC Faculty of Engineering - FEN State University of Rio de Janeiro - UERJ Rua Sã o Franci s c o X a v i e r , 5 2 4 , 5 o. andar Maracan ã , CEP 20559-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Library of Congress Control Number: 2006925434 ISSN print edition: 1860-949X ISSN electronic edition: 1860-9503 ISBN-10 3-540-33868-3 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-33868-0 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the mate- rial is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recita- tion, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Cleaners: a Study in Ant Robotics
    Israel A. Wagner Cooperative Cleaners: Computer Science Department Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel A Study in Ant Robotics [email protected] and IBM Haifa Labs, MATAM, Haifa 31905, Israel [email protected] Yaniv Altshuler Vladimir Yanovski Alfred M. Bruckstein Computer Science Department Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel Abstract of robots without a central supervisor, using only local inter- actions between the robots. When this decentralized approach In the world of living creatures, simple-minded animals often coop- is used, much of the communication overheads (characteristic erate to achieve common goals with amazing performance. One can of centralized systems) are saved, the hardware of the robots consider this idea in the context of robotics, and suggest models for can be fairly simple and better modularity is achieved. A prop- programming goal-oriented behavior into the members of a group of erly designed system should achieve reliability through redun- simple robots lacking global supervision. This can be done by con- dancy. trolling the local interactions between the robot agents, to have them Significant research effort has been invested during the last jointly carry out a given mission. As a test case we analyze the prob- few years in design and simulation of multi-agent systems lem of many simple robots cooperating to clean the dirty floor of a (Brooks 1990 Steels 1990 Levi 1992 Sen et al. 1994 Arkin non-convex region in Z2, using the dirt on the floor as the main means and Balch 1998 Wagner et al. 1998 Wagner and Bruckstein of inter-robot communication. 2001). Such designs are often inspired by biology (see Brooks 1986 Arkin 1990 Arkin and Balch 1997 for behavior-based KEY WORDS—robotics, covering, multirobotics, robustness, control models, Deneubourg et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Robotics Стр
    Ant Robotics Стр . 1 из 4 additives | food ingredients | food additives | banned ingredients in food Dangerous Food Additives Source Guide | A | Ant robotics Bookmark this page Ant Robotics Related Topics FDA News Images : Ant Robotics FDA Warns Marketers of Unapproved Ant colony optimization Chelation Drugs Ants counter drugs have not been approved for chelation therapy. Pheromone Possible Fracture Risk With Osteoporosis Robots Drugs - The Food and Drug Administration Swarm Intelligence warns patients and health care providers about the possible risk of thigh bone Swarm robotics fracture in patients treated with bisphosphonates, a class of drugs used to prevent and treat osteoporosis. Consumer Update Analytics Sept. 30, 2010 - Sept. 17 - Sept. 30, 2010 Miracle Treatment Turns into Potent Bleach - A product marketed on the Internet as a treatment for many illnesses becomes a powerful bleaching agent when used as General Description directed. Ant robotics is a special case of swarm robotics. Infant Sleep Positioners Pose Suffocation Swarm robots are simple and cheap robots with Risk - Babies are at risk for suffocation limited sensing and computational capabilities. This when positioners are used in their cribs. makes it feasible to deploy teams of swarm robots Light Tobacco Products Pose Heavy Health and take advantage of the resulting fault tolerance Risks - Cigarettes labeled light, low, and and parallelism. Swarm robots cannot use mild are disappearing from the back wall of conventional planning methods due to their limited retail shops as health agencies work to sensing and computational capabilities. Thus, their inform smokers there s no such thing as a behavior is often driven by local interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Control of Multi-Elastic-Link Robots Under Gravity
    Modeling and Control of Multi-Elastic-Link Robots under Gravity From Oscillation Damping and Position Control to Physical Interaction DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doktor Ingenieur (Doctor of Engineering) in the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at TU Dortmund University by Dipl.-Ing. Jörn Malzahn Essen, Germany Date of submission: 10th February 2014 First examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Prof. h.c. Dr. h.c. Torsten Bertram Second examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. Burkhard Corves Date of approval: 27th October 2014 Preface Robotics is a fascinating scientific discipline. By developing robots we assemble metal or plastic parts, wires as well as integrated circuits. Through software, we try to equip this assembly of lifeless components with a certain degree of apparent autonomy, which makes it move and interact with our environment. We struggle to convert basic movements and interactions into useful skills enabling e.g. robust locomotion on uneven terrain or dexterous manipulation of arbitrary objects. The harder we struggle, the more exciting becomes the moment, when a robot finally accomplishes some desired task. The struggle also completely changes our everyday perspective on how impressively rapid, easy and reliable humans learn and adapt to the various complex situations in life. Just look at young children starting their first grasping experiments... When I started studying electrical engineering at TU Dortmund University, my plan was to dive into this fascinating world of robotics with all its facets as a robot developer. While writing these lines I can look back and say the plan seems to have worked out pretty well so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregation Behaviour As a Source of Collective Decision in a Group of Cockroach-Like-Robots0
    Aggregation behaviour as a source of collective decision in a group of cockroach-like-robots0 Simon Garnier1, Christian Jost1, Rapha¨el Jeanson1, Jacques Gautrais1, Masoud Asadpour2, Gilles Caprari2, and Guy Theraulaz1 1 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, UMR-CNRS 5169, Universit´ePaul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, FRANCE [email protected], 2 Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, SWITZERLAND Abstract. In group-living animals, aggregation favours interactions and information exchanges between individuals, and thus allows the emer- gence of complex collective behaviors. In previous works, a model of a self-enhanced aggregation was deduced from experiments with the cock- roach Blattella germanica. In the present work, this model was imple- mented in micro-robots Alice and successfully reproduced the agrega- tion dynamics observed in a group of cockroaches. We showed that this aggregation process, based on a small set of simple behavioral rules of interaction, can be used by the group of robots to select collectively an aggregation site among two identical or different shelters. Moreover, we showed that the aggregation mechanism allows the robots as a group to “estimate” the size of each shelter during the collective decision-making process, a capacity which is not explicitly coded at the individual level. 1 Introduction Since the last 15 years, collective robotics has undergone a considerable devel- opment [18]. In order to control the behavior of a group of robots, collective robotics was often inspired by the collective abilities demonstrated by social in- sects [3, 15]. Indeed, nature has already developed many strategies that solve collective problems through the decentralized organisation and coordination of many autonomous agents by self-organized mechanisms [4].
    [Show full text]