DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawking Radiation 휅푡 휔푖푛 ∼ 푒 휔표푢푡 4 Surface Gravity of the Black Hole Negative Frequency Waves Positive Negative Frequency Frequency out Wave Wave

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawking Radiation 휅푡 휔푖푛 ∼ 푒 휔표푢푡 4 Surface Gravity of the Black Hole Negative Frequency Waves Positive Negative Frequency Frequency out Wave Wave Mixing of positive and negative frequency waves at the optical horizon Maxime Jacquet, Vyome Singh and Friedrich König Quantum Optics Group, University of St Andrews ICNFP’17 – 22/08/17 1 Curvature of spacetime and event horizon Nasa website Luminet, 1979 General Relativity identifies gravity with curvature of spacetime Point of no return: event horizon Penrose, 1972 General Relativity: nothing can escape a black hole 2 Spontaneous emission from the vacuum out in 3 Spontaneous emission from the vacuum out † ∗ in: 휙 = d휔(푎휔푓휔 + 푎휔푓휔 ) 푎 0 = 0 † ∗ out: 휙 = d휔(푎 휔퐹휔 + 푎 휔퐹휔 ) 푎 0 = 0 ′ ∗ Express out modes in terms of in modes: 퐹휔 = d휔 (훼휔휔′푓휔′ + 훽휔휔′푓휔′) 0 ≠ 0 푎 0 = 훽휔휔′ 1 > 0 휔′ Spontaneous emission from the vacuum! in Black hole Hawking radiation 휅푡 휔푖푛 ∼ 푒 휔표푢푡 4 surface gravity of the black hole Negative frequency waves positive negative frequency frequency out wave wave † ∗ in: 휙 = d휔(푎휔푓휔 + 푎휔푓휔 ) 푎 0 = 0 positive negative frequency frequency 휙 = d휔(푎 퐹 + 푎 † 퐹∗ ) 푎 0 = 0 out: 휔 휔 휔 휔 wave wave ′ ∗ Express out modes in terms of in modes: 퐹휔 = d휔 (훼휔휔′푓휔′ + 훽휔휔′푓휔′) positive frequency wave 0 ≠ 0 mixing of positive and negative frequency waves Spontaneous emission from the vacuum! mixing of creation and annihilation operator Black hole Hawking radiation in 휅푡 휔푖푛 ∼ 푒 휔표푢푡 5 surface gravity of the black hole Negative frequency waves positive negative frequency frequency out wave wave † ∗ in: 휙 = d휔(푎휔푓휔 + 푎휔푓휔 ) 푎 0 = 0 positive negative frequency frequency 휙 = d휔(푎 퐹 + 푎 † 퐹∗ ) 푎 0 = 0 out: 휔 휔 휔 휔 wave wave ′ ∗ Express out modes in terms of in modes: 퐹휔 = d휔 (훼휔휔′푓휔′ + 훽휔휔′푓휔′) positive frequency wave 0 ≠ 0 mixing of positive and negative frequency waves Spontaneous emission from the vacuum! mixing of creation and annihilation operator Black hole Hawking radiation Does this effect occur only in 휅푡 in a gravitational setup? 휔푖푛 ∼ 푒 휔표푢푡 6 surface gravity of the black hole Spacetime flow at the horizon Subluminal flow of spacetime Superluminal flow of spacetime 푑푠2 = −푑푡2 + 푑푟 + 훽푑푡 2 + 푟2 푑휃 2 + 푠푖푛2휃 푑휙 2 Space flows radially inwards at velocity 훽 = 2푀/푟. At the horizon, 훽 = 푐: nothing can escape from the inside of a black hole. t ever increases towards the horizon -> light from infalling objects redshifts 7 Spacetime flow at the horizon Subluminal flow of spacetime Superluminal flow of spacetime Event horizon separates region of sub from superluminal flow Unruh (1974): spacetime as a moving fluid – the waterfall model 8 Spacetime flow at the horizon – in the lab Unruh, 1981: Flow gradient can be realized in laboratories + analogue systems can produce HR • Superfluid helium, superconducting circuits, waveguides, slow light… • Water waves • Rousseaux et al. NJP 2008. Transfer of energy to negative frequency wave at the white hole horizon. • Weinfurtner et al. PRL 2011. Frequency shift of water waves at the white hole horizon. • Rousseaux et al. PRL 2016. Noise correlations across the water-wave horizon. • Phonons in a BEC • Steinhauer Nat Phys 2016. Hawking radiation at the black hole horizon? 9 Creating analogue horizons with moving Refractive Index Front (RIF) Philbin et al., Science (2008) Pulse creates RIF modifies speed of light by Kerr effect Subluminal Superluminal Subluminal Moving analogue horizon in medium at rest Resulting HR temperature can be very high (up to 1000K) 10 Optical analogue and RIF 휔 휕휔 Dispersion: 휔 = 푓 휆 → 푣푝 ≠ 푣푔 → 푘 ≠ 휕푘 휔 = 푓 푟푒푓푟푎푐푡푖푣푒 푖푛푑푒푥 Philbin et al., Science (2008) Back of pulse blueshifts incoming light Front of pulse redshifts incoming light Moving frame: incoming wave slows down, turns around frequency shifted ≡ event horizon 11 Theoretical advances Recent efforts in optical event horizons Rubino et al. PRL (2012), Robertson PRE 90 (2014), Belgiorno et al. PRD 91 (2015), Linder et al. PRD 93 (2016) Finazzi and model for spontaneous emission Carusotto, at a moving RIF in a nonlinear dielectric PRA 89 (2013) Light emitted from the vacuum in the presence and absence of a horizon Jacquet and RIF can act as black hole, white hole and König, PRA 92 (2015) horizonless emitter First complete spectrum of light from vacuum mixing of positive and negative frequencies 12 Dispersion relation of the dielectric in the frame of the pulse n (ζ)-nR Moving frame dispersion relation δn 0 0 ζ Conserved co-moving frequency 휔′ 휕휔′ ω' Group velocity 휕푘′ k' Negative lab-frequency waves Positive lab-frequency waves 13 Dispersion relation of the dielectric in the frame of the pulse n (ζ)-nR Moving frame dispersion relation δn 0 0 ζ ω' ' ω k' 14 Simultaneous black- and white-hole horizons! n (ζ)-nR Moving frame dispersion relation δn 0 0 ζ Analogue black hole horizon ω' Analogue white hole horizon 휔′ k' Frequency is conserved Horizonless waves can scatter into other frequency intervals waves that have same 휔′ 15 Spontaneous emission of light Incoming modes scatter into outgoing modes Analogue black-hole horizon mixing positive and negative norm waves Hawking Partner Quasi pair-wise emission radiation wave 1 0 ω' Mode-mode correlation map in the moving frame 16 Spontaneous emission of light Lab Frame spectrum of spontaneous emission in bulk fused silica Incoming modes scatter into outgoing modes mixing ) positive and negative norm 1 - Black-hole emission waves m 1 - in the partner wave (s Hawking Partner radiation wave density Black-hole emission in Hawking radiation Spectral Spectral Spectral correlations? on the arxiv at the Wavelength (nm) end of the month 17 Scattering of a positive norm CW at the horizon • Scattering of coherent state: Spontaneous emission 푙푎푠푒푟, 2 2 훼푙푎푠푒푟 푛 훼푙푎푠푒푟 = a + 훽 훼푙푎푠푒푟 Parametric amplification 18 Scattering of a positive norm CW at the horizon • Scattering of coherent state: Laboratory frame dispersion relation ω ω' k' ω’=cst contour line k 19 20 Scattering of positive norm CW at horizon Frequency shifting of a 532nm CW at a horizon in PCF NL 1.5-670 21 Scattering of positive norm CW at horizon • Scattering of coherent state: Laboratory frame dispersion relation ω ω' 훼푙푎푠푒푟 푛 훼푙푎푠푒푟 푙푎푠푒푟, 2 2 = a + 훽 훼 k' 푙푎푠푒푟 ω’=cst contour line Spontaneous emission Parametric amplification k Expect about 0.1 photon/second at 222nm 22 Negative frequency at the horizon Scattering of light at a refractive index front • Pulse in nonlinear dielectric creates an analogue system to black and white holes • The front of the pulse can act as a black hole, a white hole, or a horizonless emitter Towards the experimental • Pairs emitted via the Hawking effect can measurement of pairs be observed in the optical frequency range, partner in the UV and Hawking radiation in the visible. 23 24 Light-matter interaction in a dispersive medium Laboratory frame dispersion relation ω ω2 Lagrangian for light matter Optical interaction: 휕 퐴 2 휕 퐴 2 ℒ = 푡 − 푥 frequencies 8휋푐2 8휋 3 2 2 휕푡푃푖 푃푖 퐴 + 2 − + 휕푡푃푖 2휅푖휔푖 2휅푖 푐 푖=1 ω1 k Sellmeier dispersion relation: 2 2 3 2 2 c k =ω[1+∑i=1 (4πκi)/(1-ω /ωi )] 25 Light-matter interaction in a dispersive medium Laboratory frame dispersion relation ω ω2 Lagrangian for light matter optical interaction: 2 2 Positive 휕 퐴 휕 퐴 frequencies ℒ = 푡 − 푥 8휋푐2 8휋 3 2 2 휕푡푃푖 푃푖 퐴 + 2 − + 휕푡푃푖 2휅푖휔푖 2휅푖 푐 푖=1 ω1 -ω1 k optical Sellmeier dispersion relation: negative frequencies 2 2 3 2 2 c k =ω[1+∑i=1 (4πκi)/(1-ω /ωi )] 26 -ω2 Light-matter interaction in a dispersive medium Laboratory frame dispersion relation Lagrangian for light matter ω interaction: Positive 2 2 waves 휕푡퐴 휕푥퐴 ℒ = 2 − 푎 8휋푐 8휋 norm 3 2 2 휕푡푃푖 푃푖 퐴 + 2 − + 휕푡푃푖 2휅푖휔푖 2휅푖 푐 푖=1 k Negative Sellmeier dispersion relation: waves c2k2=ω[1+∑ 3(4πκ )/(1-ω2/ω 2)] † norm i=1 i i 푎 27 Light-matter interaction in a dispersive medium Lorentz boost to frame moving at speed u: Laboratory frame dispersion relation 휔′ = 훾(휔 − 푢푘) ω ω' 푘′ = 훾(푘 − 휔 푢/푐2) Stationary RIF in the moving frame: n (ζ)-nR δn 0 0 ζ k' Moving frame dispersion relation k ω' 28 k' 5 1 2 3 4 5 4 ω' 3 2 1 k' 1 ' 2 ' 3 ' 4 ' 5 ℏ ω minLℏ ω minR ℏ ω maxL ℏ ω maxR 10- 1 ' ω ' - 2 I 10 y t i s n e d x u - 3 l 10 F 10- 4 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 29 ℏ휔′ℏω'(eV(eV)) 30 Scattering of positive norm CW at horizon Spectral density Long IR Short IR wavelength: wavelength: Green CW wave Green CW wave interacts with CW @532 nm InfraRed Pulse interacts with back of pulse front of pulse blue shift red shift 532 850 Wavelength31 (nm) 32 Negative frequency waves – nonlinear optics Coupling to waves that have negative laboratory frequency is possible creation of photon pairs linear scattering process Fourier analysis: all light waves oscillate with both positive and negative frequencies +∞ 퐴 = 퐴 휔 푒−푖휔푡푑휔 −∞ Electric field is real 퐴 −휔 = 퐴 ∗ 휔 33 Negative frequency waves – nonlinear optics Momentum conservation in the lab frame ≡ energy conservation in the moving frame Couple 7-fs pulse into few mm-long PCF Rubino, PRL (2012), McLenaghan, NJP (2014) 퐴 −휔 = 퐴 ∗ 휔 Negative frequency waves recently observed in water experiments Weinfurtner, PRL (2011), Rousseaux, NJP (2008), 34.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black Hole Termodinamics and Hawking Radiation
    Black hole thermodynamics and Hawking radiation (Just an overview by a non-expert on the field!) Renato Fonseca - 26 March 2018 – for the Journal Club Thermodynamics meets GR • Research in the 70’s convincingly brought together two very different areas of physics: thermodynamics and General Relativity • People realized that black holes (BHs) followed some laws similar to the ones observed in thermodynamics • It was then possible to associate a temperature to BHs. But was this just a coincidence? • No. Hawkings (1975) showed using QFT in curved space that BHs from gravitational collapse radiate as a black body with a certain temperature T Black Holes Schwarzschild metric (for BHs with no spin nor electric charge) • All coordinates (t,r,theta,phi) are what you think they are far from the central mass M • Something funny seems to happen for r=2M. But … locally there is nothing special there (only at r=0): r=0: real/intrinsic singularity r=2M: apparent singularity (can be removed with other coordinates) Important caveat: the Schwarzschild solution is NOT what is called maximal. With coordinates change we can get the Kruskal solution, which is. “Maximal”= ability to continue geodesics until infinity or an intrinsic singularity Schwarzschild metric (for BHs with no spin nor electric charge) • r=2M (event horizon) is not special for its LOCAL properties (curvature, etc) but rather for its GLOBAL properties: r<=2M are closed trapped surfaces which cannot communicate with the outside world [dr/dt=0 at r=2M even for light] Fun fact: for null geodesics (=light) we see that +/- = light going out/in One can even integrate this: t=infinite for even light to fall into the BH! This is what an observatory at infinity sees … (Penrose, 1969) Schwarzschild metric (digression) • But the object itself does fall into the BH.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawking Radiation As Perceived by Different Observers L C Barbado, C Barceló, L J Garay
    Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers L C Barbado, C Barceló, L J Garay To cite this version: L C Barbado, C Barceló, L J Garay. Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers. Classical and Quantum Gravity, IOP Publishing, 2011, 10 (12), pp.125021. 10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125021. hal-00710459 HAL Id: hal-00710459 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00710459 Submitted on 21 Jun 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Confidential: not for distribution. Submitted to IOP Publishing for peer review 24 March 2011 Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers LCBarbado1,CBarcel´o1 and L J Garay2,3 1 Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa(CSIC),GlorietadelaAstronom´ıa, 18008 Granada, Spain 2 Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain 3 Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (CSIC), Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We use a method recently introduced in Barcel´o et al, 10.1103/Phys- RevD.83.041501, to analyse Hawking radiation in a Schwarzschild black hole as per- ceived by different observers in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Quantum Gravity on the Stability of Black Holes
    S S symmetry Article Effect of Quantum Gravity on the Stability of Black Holes Riasat Ali 1 , Kazuharu Bamba 2,* and Syed Asif Ali Shah 1 1 Department of Mathematics, GC University Faisalabad Layyah Campus, Layyah 31200, Pakistan; [email protected] (R.A.); [email protected] (S.A.A.S.) 2 Division of Human Support System, Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Science, Fukushima University, Fukushima 960-1296, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 April 2019; Accepted: 26 April 2019; Published: 5 May 2019 Abstract: We investigate the massive vector field equation with the WKB approximation. The tunneling mechanism of charged bosons from the gauged super-gravity black hole is observed. It is shown that the appropriate radiation consistent with black holes can be obtained in general under the condition that back reaction of the emitted charged particle with self-gravitational interaction is neglected. The computed temperatures are dependant on the geometry of black hole and quantum gravity. We also explore the corrections to the charged bosons by analyzing tunneling probability, the emission radiation by taking quantum gravity into consideration and the conservation of charge and energy. Furthermore, we study the quantum gravity effect on radiation and discuss the instability and stability of black hole. Keywords: higher dimension gauged super-gravity black hole; quantum gravity; quantum tunneling phenomenon; Hawking radiation 1. Introduction General relativity is associated with the thermodynamics and quantum effect which are strongly supportive of each other. A black hole (BH) is a compact object whose gravitational pull is so intense that can not escape the light.
    [Show full text]
  • Firewalls and the Quantum Properties of Black Holes
    Firewalls and the Quantum Properties of Black Holes A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from the College of William and Mary by Dylan Louis Veyrat Advisor: Marc Sher Senior Research Coordinator: Gina Hoatson Date: May 10, 2015 1 Abstract With the proposal of black hole complementarity as a solution to the information paradox resulting from the existence of black holes, a new problem has become apparent. Complementarity requires a vio- lation of monogamy of entanglement that can be avoided in one of two ways: a violation of Einstein’s equivalence principle, or a reworking of Quantum Field Theory [1]. The existence of a barrier of high-energy quanta - or “firewall” - at the event horizon is the first of these two resolutions, and this paper aims to discuss it, for Schwarzschild as well as Kerr and Reissner-Nordstr¨omblack holes, and to compare it to alternate proposals. 1 Introduction, Hawking Radiation While black holes continue to present problems for the physical theories of today, quite a few steps have been made in the direction of understanding the physics describing them, and, consequently, in the direction of a consistent theory of quantum gravity. Two of the most central concepts in the effort to understand black holes are the black hole information paradox and the existence of Hawking radiation [2]. Perhaps the most apparent result of black holes (which are a consequence of general relativity) that disagrees with quantum principles is the possibility of information loss. Since the only possible direction in which to pass through the event horizon is in, toward the singularity, it would seem that information 2 entering a black hole could never be retrieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1410.1486V2 [Gr-Qc] 26 Aug 2015
    October 2014 Black Hole Thermodynamics S. Carlip∗ Department of Physics University of California Davis, CA 95616 USA Abstract The discovery in the early 1970s that black holes radiate as black bodies has radically affected our understanding of general relativity, and offered us some early hints about the nature of quantum gravity. In this chapter I will review the discovery of black hole thermodynamics and summarize the many indepen- dent ways of obtaining the thermodynamic and (perhaps) statistical mechanical properties of black holes. I will then describe some of the remaining puzzles, including the nature of the quantum microstates, the problem of universality, and the information loss paradox. arXiv:1410.1486v2 [gr-qc] 26 Aug 2015 ∗email: [email protected] 1 Introduction The surprising discovery that black holes behave as thermodynamic objects has radically affected our understanding of general relativity and its relationship to quantum field theory. In the early 1970s, Bekenstein [1, 2] and Hawking [3, 4] showed that black holes radiate as black bodies, with characteristic temperatures and entropies ~κ Ahor kTH = ;SBH = ; (1.1) 2π 4~G where κ is the surface gravity and Ahor is the area of the horizon. These quantities appear to be inherently quantum gravitational, in the sense that they depend on both Planck's constant ~ and Newton's constant G. The resulting black body radiation, Hawking radiation, has not yet been directly observed: the temperature of an astrophysical black hole is on the order of a microkelvin, far lower than the cosmic microwave background temperature. But the Hawking temperature and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy have been derived in so many independent ways, in different settings and with different assumptions, that it seems extraordinarily unlikely that they are not real.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK HOLE THERMODYNAMICS the Horizon Area Theorem 1970: Stephen Hawking Uses the Theory of General Relativity to Derive the So-Called
    BLACK HOLE THERMODYNAMICS The horizon area theorem 1970: Stephen Hawking uses the theory of general relativity to derive the so-called Horizon area theorem The total horizon area in a closed system containing black holes never decreases. It can only increase or stay the same. [Stephen Hawking] Analogy between the area theorem and the 2nd law of thermodynamic Shortly after Stephen Hawking Formulated the area theorem, Jacob Beckenstein, at the time a graduate student at Princeton, noticed the analogy between the area theorem and the 2nd law of thermodynamics: [Jacob Beckenstein] The total area of a closed system never decreases. Entropy: logarithm of the number of ways you can relocate the atoms and molecules of a system without changing the overall properties of the system. Example of entropy: toys in a playroom (Thorne, pg. 424) Extremely orderly: 20 toys on 1 tile This playroom floor has 100 tiles, on which the kids can arrange 20 different toys. Parents prefer the toys to be kept in an extremely orderly configuration, with all the toys piled on one tile in one corner, as shown. There is only one such arrangement; the entropy of this configuration is thus the Number of equivalent rearrangements = 1; logarithm of 1, which is zero. entropy = 0. [This and next two slides courtesy of D. Watson] Entropy in a playroom (continued) Orderly: 20 toys on 10 tiles Parents might even accept this somewhat less orderly configuration: 20 different toys on 10 specific tiles. But there are lots of different equivalent arrangements (e.g. swapping the positions of two toys on different tiles produces a different arrangement that’s still acceptable): 1020 of them, in Number of equivalent rearrangements = 1020; fact, for an entropy value of “entropy” = 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Thermodynamics
    Black Hole Thermodynamics Reading: Wald 12.5 There is good evidence that after formation black holes relax to stationary configurations, characterized by mass, angular momentum, and gauge charges. This is a negligible amount of data compared to the many ways we can form black holes, suggesting that they ought to be thought of as thermodynamic entities. If so we need to identify their temperature and entropy and ask if they satisfy the laws of thermodynamics. This was a great discovery by Bekenstein and Hawking who showed black holes are thermal only after quantum effects are taken into account and their entropy is the horizon area=4G. To motivate these answers, let us return to the Kerr solution and consider the area of a constant t section of the horizon. The induced metric is (r2 + a2)2 ds2 = Σdθ2 + + sin2 θ d'2; (1) Σ and the resulting area is 2 2 2 2 p 4 4 2 2 A = 4π(r+ + a ) = 8π(G M + G M − G J ): (2) In the last step we used J = Ma and the definition of r+ to write A in terms of black hole mass and spin. Under an infinitesimal change dM and dJ, we obtaind p G4M 4 − G2J 2 dM = Ω dJ + dA: (3) H 2G2MA This equation is reminding of the first law of thermodynamics dE = µdQ + T dS (in a system with rotation symmetry, Ω is the chemical potential associated to the conserved charge J). It suggests identifying the horizon area with black hole entropy SBH / A; (4) though we need a different calculation to determine the temperature and hence the (positive) proportionality constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Radiation and Volume Statistical Entropy
    Black Hole Radiation and Volume Statistical Entropy Mario Rabinowitz1 ________________________________________________________________________ G The simplest possible equation for Hawking radiation P = h , and other black SH 90 hole radiated power is derived in terms of black hole density, . Black hole density also leads to the simplest possible model of a gas of elementary constituents confined inside a gravitational bottle of Schwarzchild radius at tremendous pressure, which yields identically the same functional dependence 3 as the traditional black hole entropy S bh ()kAc / hG . Variations of Sbh can be obtained which depend on the occupancy of phase space cells. A relation is R derived between the constituent momenta and the black hole radius H , 3 h p = , which is similar to the Compton wavelength relation. 2 R H ________________________________________________________________________ Key Words: Black Hole Entropy, Hawking Radiation, Black Hole density. 1. INTRODUCTION The object of this paper is to gain an insight into black holes. This is first done by finding the simplest possible equation for black hole radiation. Then we shall find the simplest possible model which can give some comprehension as to why black hole entropy appears to be related only to its surface area. This attempt at understanding black hole entropy is done in the same spirit as was the paper on Classical Tunneling (Cohn and Rabinowitz, 1990) which showed how far a simple classical model can go to illume the phenomenon of quantum tunneling . 1Armor Research, 715 Lakemead Way; Redwood City, California 94062-3922 -1- of 10 The strategy here will be to find the number of elementary constituents, N, which fill a black hole, simply modeled as a gravitational bottle.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1905.01301V1 [Hep-Ph] 3 May 2019 Radiation and Dark Matter [77, 80, 84]
    FERMILAB-PUB-19-186-A Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination Dan Hoopera;b;c,∗ Gordan Krnjaica,y and Samuel D. McDermottaz aFermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Theoretical Astrophysics Group, Batavia, IL 60510 bUniversity of Chicago, Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, Chicago, IL 60637 and cUniversity of Chicago, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dated: May 6, 2019) If even a relatively small number of black holes were created in the early universe, they will constitute an increasingly large fraction of the total energy density as space expands. It is thus well-motivated to consider scenarios in which the early universe included an era in which primordial black holes dominated the total energy density. Within this context, we consider Hawking radiation as a mechanism to produce both dark radiation and dark matter. If the early universe included a black hole dominated era, we find that Hawking radiation will produce dark radiation at a level ∆Neff 0:03 0:2 for each light and decoupled species of spin 0, 1/2, or 1. This range is well suited∼ to relax− the tension between late and early-time Hubble determinations, and is within the reach of upcoming CMB experiments. The dark matter could also originate as Hawking radiation in a black hole dominated early universe, although such dark matter candidates must be very heavy 11 (mDM > 10 GeV) if they are to avoid exceeding the measured abundance. ∼ I. INTRODUCTION It has long been appreciated that inhomogeneties in the early universe could lead to the formation of primordial black holes [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Quantum Hawking Radiation and Its Entanglement in an Analogue Black Hole
    Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole Jeff Steinhauer Department of Physics, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel We observe spontaneous Hawking radiation, stimulated by quantum vacuum fluctuations, emanating from an analogue black hole in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate. Correlations are observed between the Hawking particles outside the black hole and the partner particles inside. These correlations indicate an approximately thermal distribution of Hawking radiation. We find that the high energy pairs are entangled, while the low energy pairs are not, within the reasonable assumption that excitations with different frequencies are not correlated. The entanglement verifies the quantum nature of the Hawking radiation. The results are consistent with a driven oscillation experiment and a numerical simulation. 50 years ago, Bekenstein discovered the field of black hole thermodynamics1. This field has vast and deep implications, far beyond the physics of black holes themselves. The most important prediction of the field is that of Hawking radiation2,3. By making an approximation to the still- unknown laws of quantum gravity, Hawking predicted that the horizon of the black hole should emit a thermal distribution of particles. Furthermore, each Hawking particle should be entangled with a partner particle falling into the black hole. This presents a puzzle of information loss, and even the unitarity of quantum mechanics falls into question4-6. 1 Despite the importance of black hole thermodynamics, there were no experimental results to provide guidance. The problem is that the Hawking radiation emanating from a real black hole should be exceedingly weak.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawking Radiation Large Distance (Much Bigger Than Planck Length)
    Resolving the information paradox Samir D. Mathur CERN 2009 Lecture 1: What is the information paradox ? Lecture 2: Making black holes in string theory : fuzzballs Lecture 3: Dynamical questions about black holes Lecture 4: Applying lessons to Cosmology, open questions Two basic points: The Hawking ‘theorem’ : If (a) All quantum gravity effects are confined to within a given distance like planck length or string length dn dn (b)√ TheN nvacuum√n + 1is unique√N√Nn √√nn++11 (n√+N1) √n + 1ndn (175)(n + 1) n (175) −√N n √n + ≈1 − √Ndt ∝√≈n + 1 dt(n∝+ 1) n (175) − ≈ 1 dt ∝ 1 gravity gravity ωR = [ l 2 mψm + mφn] = ω (176) Then there WILLωR be= inf[ormationl 2 m ψlossm + mφn] = ωR (17R6) R − − − 1 R − − − gravity ωR = [ l 2 mψm + mφn] = ω (176) m = n + n + 1, n = nm =nnL + nR + 1, n = nLR (1n7R7) (177) String theory: Bound statesL ofR quantaR − in− stringL−− Rtheory have a ‘large’− size λ m n + m m = 0, N = 0 (178) λ mψn + mφm= =n 0,+ nN =+0 ψ1, nφ= n n (178) (177) | − | L | R− | L − R This size grows withλ = the0, nmumber= l, ofn branes= 0λ, = 0inN, =them0ψ bound= l, staten = 0,, N(17=9)0 (179) ψ − − making the state a ‘horizon sizedλ quantumgramvitψy n + fuzzball’mφm = 0, gravNity = 0 (178) ωI |= ω−I |ωI = ωI (180) (180) 0 λψ= 0, <m0ψψ=0 0l, nψ = 0, < N0 ψ=(10801) (1(8117)9) | % | % | |% ≈%− | % | % ≈ gravity ωI = ωI (180) 0 ψ 0 ψ 0 (181) | % | % & | % ≈ 10 10 10 Lecture 1 What exactly is the black hole information paradox? (arXiv 0803.2030) The information problem: a first pass Hawking radiation Large distance (much bigger than planck length) How can the Hawking radiation carry the information of the initial matter ? If the radiation does not carry the information, then the final state cannot be determined from the initial state, and there is no Schrodinger type evolution equation for the whole system.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacetime Singularities and a Novel Formulation of Indeterminism
    Spacetime singularities and a novel formulation of indeterminism Feraz Azhar∗ Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA & Black Hole Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA Mohammad Hossein Namjooy School of Astronomy, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran (Dated: January 26, 2021) Spacetime singularities in general relativity are commonly thought to be problematic, in that they signal a breakdown in the theory. We address the question of how to interpret this breakdown, restricting our attention to classical considerations (though our work has ramifications for more general classical metric theories of gravity, as well). In particular, we argue for a new claim: spacetime singularities in general relativity signal indeterminism. The usual manner in which indeterminism is formulated for physical theories can be traced back to Laplace. This formulation is based on the non-uniqueness of future (or past) states of a physical system|as understood in the context of a physical theory|as a result of the specification of an antecedent state (or, respectively, of a subsequent state). We contend that for physical theories generally, this formulation does not comprehensively capture the relevant sense of a lack of determination. And, in particular, it does not com- prehensively capture the sense(s) in which a lack of determination (and so, indeterminism) arises due to spacetime singularities in general relativity. We thus present a novel, broader formulation, in which indeterminism in the context of some physical theory arises whenever one of the three following conditions holds: future (and/or past) states are (i) not unique|as for Laplacian notions of indeterminism; (ii) not specified; or (iii) `incoherent'|that is, they fail to satisfy certain desiderata that are internal to the theory and/or imposed from outside the theory.
    [Show full text]