APPENDIX S: HAZING INSTITUTIONAL REPORT (5 YEAR) 1/1/2016 – 8/1/2021 as of 8/1/2021

Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) 1) Men’s Ice 1/22/2018 N/A; No It was reported The reporter N/A; the reporter did not Men’s Ice Hockey Hockey (Club evidence that Men’s Ice did not wish to participate in an (Club Sport) Sport) presented to Hockey members provide names investigation, and there 1/22/2018 alleged proceed with were requiring or evidence, was no evidence to move incident resolved investigation. other members and did not forward with an 1/25/2018. to drink from a wish to investigation. Due to the dirty boot. participate in lack of evidence, the an alleged incident was investigation. addressed educationally The Assistant with a mandatory Men’s Director of Ice Hockey meeting on Recreational hazing for all members on Sports 1/25/2018, facilitated by addressed the the Assistant Director of alleged hazing Recreational Sports. concern with a mandatory Men’s Ice Hockey meeting with all members present. Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) 2) Sigma 10/10/2018 10/25/2018 It was Office of The Office of Student Sigma Tau Tau reported that Student Conduct sanctioned Gamma case Gamma Sigma Tau Conduct found the following for resolved (Fraternity) Gamma Sigma Tau Sigma Tau Gamma: 2/1/2019. Sigma Tau participated in Gamma 1) 5-year suspension Gamma’s suspension hazing involving responsible 1/9/2019 – ends 1/22/2024. a kidnapping and for hazing 1/22/2024. Sigma Tau Gamma will “drop off” of new from fall 2014 2) Previous Sigma Tau be eligible to members of through Gamma members or reestablish the Sigma Tau fall 2018 alumni are not permitted chapter by the Gamma. including: to participate in re- national headquarters 1) participating initiation of Sigma Tau on 1/23/2024 if all in a kidnapping Gamma on campus. The stipulations of the and “drop off” of Sigma Tau Gamma sanction have been new members national organization will completed. Previous 2) requiring re-initiate the Sigma Tau Gamma new members organization on campus. members or alumni to consume 3) Financial obligation for are not permitted to expired foods, removal of signs on participate in the 3) requiring campus. reestablishment of new members Sigma Tau Gamma at to participate in SRU. drinking games, 4) restricting new member activities, and 5) isolating and yelling at new members prior to meeting their big brothers at initiation Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) 3) Women’s Fall 2014 1/2019 It was reported Office of Student The Office of Student Women’s Rugby Rugby (Club through Fall that Women’s Conduct found Conduct sanctioned the (Club Sport) case Sport) 2018 Rugby required a Women’s Rugby following for Women’s resolved scavenger hunt responsible for Rugby: 3/8/2019. for new hazing from fall 1) 5-year suspension Women’s Rugby members 2014 through fall 3/7/2019 – 5/18/2024 suspension ends including 2018 including 2) Previous Women’s Rugby 5/18/2024. Women’s violations of the requiring a members or alumni Rugby will be eligible law including scavenger hunt are not permitted to for re-establishment drinking games, that included participate in re-initiation at SRU on 5/19/2024 and humiliating violations of the on campus. if all stipulations of acts. law including 3) Women's Rugby would the sanction have drinking games, be required to have an SRU been completed. and humiliating faculty or staff member Previous Women’s acts. (campus security authority/ Rugby members or mandated reporter) coach alumni are not before reinstatement at permitted to SRU. This coach would participate in the need to be approved by reestablishment of Club Sports staff under the Women’s Rugby at Office for Student SRU. Engagement and Leadership. This coach would also need to have training, including training on hazing, as approved by Club Sports under the Office for Student Engagement and Leadership. 4) Previous Women’s Rugby members or alumni are not permitted to Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) participate in re-initiation on campus. 4) SRU Marching 8/29/2018 N/A; the It was reported After gathering N/A; Student Conduct did SRU Marching Pride Pride Band report was to SRU staff that information not determine evidence to Band case resolved determined a SRU Band was from multiple support these hazing 9/7/2018. rumor and hazing. parties including allegations. therefore the the SRU organization Marching Pride was not Band director, it charged. was determined that there was no evidence to support that the SRU Marching Pride Band was hazing. An SRU Marching Pride Band member was changing majors, and a rumor started that Band was hazing. 5) Men’s Rugby Fall 2018/ 3/21/19 It was reported After a thorough N/A; Student Conduct did Men’s Rugby (Club) (Club Sport) Spring 2019 that Men’s Rugby investigation, not determine evidence to case resolved was still the Office of support these hazing 4/9/2019. participating in Student allegations. “Scav,” a Conduct did not scavenger hunt determine including evidence to violations of the support that law. Men’s Rugby has participated in a scavenger Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) hunt or hazing activities in fall 2018 or spring 2019. 6) Men’s Fall 2018 Fall 2018 It was reported Protected by 18 Protected by 18 Pa.C.S. Resolved effective Basketball Team that members of Pa.C.S. §2809(d) §2809(d) 5/14/2021. (Athletics) the Men’s Basketball team were being treated in a manner that placed team members in physical jeopardy and were subject to acts that adversely affect player’s mental health 7) Alpha Sigma 9/16/2019 Fall 2019 It was reported Student N/A; Student Conduct did Alpha Phi (Fraternity) investigation that Alpha Sigma Conduct did not not determine evidence to (Fraternity) case and 9/2/2020 Phi hazes. It was determine support these hazing resolved 9/17/2020. group reported that a evidence to allegations. Investigation former Alpha support these Sigma Phi hazing member allegations. indicated that another fraternity “isn’t a real fraternity if they don’t haze.” It was reported that members had Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) to drink something (a concoction) to be a member. It was reported that there was writing in the basement of an old Alpha Sigma Phi house referencing hazing. It was reported that Alpha Sigma Phi new members had to participate in “Hell Week,” had to do pushups, were yelled at by brothers, had to stay up for three days, and had to call brothers “sir.” It was reported that Alpha Sigma Phi members harassed students who had started to pledge the fraternity but then declined to Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) pledge the fraternity. 8) Club Sport 9/16/2019 N/A; It was reported The director of N/A; Organization was not Club Sport (Anonymous) Organization that Club Sport Student charged. (Anonymous) case was not members were Conduct resolved 10/7/2019. charged. concerned that followed up On 10/7/19, the an outing with the reporter indicated required by the reporter and the that after the reporter coach for team Assistant provided follow up building Director of Club information, the constituted Sports. Based reporter had not hazing. on the heard back from the information Club Sport members provided, hazing regarding the alleged was not hazing. The Assistant determined. Director of Club Sports The reporter also confirmed as of provided 10/7/19 that he had information to not heard from any of the concerned the Club Sports Club Sport members. members for follow up, and the Club Sport members did not follow up with the reporter or the Assistant Director of Club Sports with additional details, to determine if Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) there were additional details to constitute alleged hazing. 9) Date of N/A; Based on a The director of N/A; Organization was not Rho (Fraternity) alleged Organization student Student charged with hazing. The (Fraternity) case incident: was not comment, there Conduct director of Student resolved 12/11/2019. 9/17/19 charged. was concern that gathered Conduct gathered a physical assault additional additional information, and that occurred information, determined that the involving Kappa and determined evidence gathered did not Delta Rho that the support that the physical members was evidence assault was related to related to hazing. gathered did hazing. not support that the physical assault was related to hazing. 10) Date of N/A; Reporter It was reported N/A; Reporter N/A; Reporter retracted Pi Kappa Phi (Fraternity) alleged retracted that Pi Kappa Phi retracted allegation of alleged Pi (Fraternity) case incident: allegation of is hazing, allegation of Kappa Phi hazing. resolved 10/10/2019. 9/17/19 alleged Pi including alleged Pi Kappa Kappa Phi paddling new Phi hazing. hazing. members. 11) Men’s Ice 9/21/2019 3/5/2020 It was reported A group A Student Conduct hearing Men’s Ice Hockey Hockey (Club that Men’s Ice investigation board sanctioned the (Club Sport) Sport) Hockey hosted was completed. following: 9/21/2019 incident an annual Rookie A Student 1) 4-year suspension resolved 1/8/2021. Day party that Conduct hearing 11/18/20-11/18/24. involved board found 2) Previous members of excessive alcohol Men’s Ice Men’s Ice Hockey may not consumption, Hockey be involved in the re- Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) underage alcohol responsible for establishment of Men’s Ice consumption, hazing for Hockey. furnishing hosting an alcohol to annual “Rookie minors, and the Day” event that requirement of involved new members to excessive participate in alcohol exotic dancer consumption, activities. underage alcohol consumption, furnishing alcohol to minors, the provision of exotic dancers to target new members with exotic dancer activities, and the requirement of new members to participate in challenges including physical challenges such as a scavenger hunt and foot races. Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) 12) Pi Kappa Date of 1/28/20 Office of The Office of Student Pi Kappa Alpha Alpha alleged allegedly hazed Student Conduct sanctioned the (Fraternity) case (Fraternity) incidents: pledges fall 2016 Conduct found following for Pi Kappa resolved 3/31/2020. Fall 2016 through fall Pi Kappa Alpha Alpha: through Fall 2019. responsible for 1) 5-year suspension 2019. hazing from fall 1/28/2020 – 1/28/2025. 2016 through 2) Previous Pi Kappa Alpha fall 2019, members or alumni are not including: permitted to participate in 1. Requiring the reestablishment of the new members chapter by the national to participate in headquarters of Pi Kappa “Hell Week” Alpha at SRU. activities, 3) Financial obligation for 2. Requiring removal of signs on new members campus. to participate in line-ups, 3. Requiring new members to participate in drinking activities, and 4. Paddling new members. 13) Student 11/20/2019 N/A; Student It was reported The director of N/A; Student Organization Student Organization Organization Organization that 4 (four) Student Name Unknown (Name Unknown) case (Name Name males were Conduct resolved 11/20/2019. Unknown) Unknown sleeping in the encouraged the library, with one reporter to designated as a attempt to gain “lookout.” names of the sleeping males if it happened Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s) again in the future. 14) Alpha Kappa 2/6/2020 2/25/2020 It was reported Alpha Kappa Psi was Alpha Kappa Psi Psi Business that Alpha Kappa was found sanctioned: Business Fraternity Fraternity Psi Business responsible for 1) Disciplinary Probation (Student Organization) (Student Fraternity having new 2/27/2020 – 2/27/2022 case resolved Organization) members hazed members sign 2) All Alpha Kappa Psi 2/27/2020. new members. books, members participated in an participating in educational presentation lineups (new on hazing by the director of members were Student Conduct on put on the spot 3/3/2020 from 8:00pm – and questioned 9:00pm, including a by members), presentation on all hazing and utilizing violations of the Student blindfolds Code of Conduct and a (blankets) in the question/answer session. initiation of new 3) Alpha Kappa Psi Risk members. Management student Members member representative (brothers) were voluntarily met with the “blindfolded” director of Student (covered in Conduct on 3/25/20 to blankets to discuss continued efforts of cover their eyes) risk management. and new 4) Alpha Kappa Psi members were President and Alpha Kappa not blindfolded. Psi faculty adviser had several follow up meetings with the director of Student Conduct to discuss continued hazing prevention efforts. Subject Date of Date Violation Description of Investigation Sanctions Date Resolved [Organization] Alleged Charged Violation Findings Incident(s)

15) SRU Band 3/28/21 N/A; the An SRU student N/A; The N/A; the incident Case resolved Faculty incident was reported that incident was was referred to the 4/2/2021. Member referred to an SRU Band referred to the academic the academic faculty member academic department. The department. hazed this SRU department to reporter was also student. address given information alleged about how to file a professional complaint with the conduct academic behaviors. department against the faculty member.