Of Questions for Future Research Which May Resolve Some of the Controversy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Essay: Long Gone, but Not Forgotten
Long gone, but not forgotten Author Finnane, Mark Published 2008 Journal Title Griffith Review Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2008. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owner for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23817 Link to published version https://griffithreview.com/articles/long-gone-but-not-forgotten/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Essay: Long gone, but not forgotten Author: Mark Finnane n 1989 I was party to a writ sought by a number of historians to prevent the destruction of Special Branch records. The writ was provoked by the decision of Ithe Queensland police, with the agreed and required authority of the State Archivist, to destroy the files that had been maintained by the state’s Police Special Branch. The writ faded away in circumstances that are lost to me. But the incident holds a retrospective fascination. It points to the strangely ambivalent status of the Special Branch in the history of the 1950s to the 1980s, during which the threats of a political police in Australia were more imagined than realised. As historians, we thought it important that this controversial part of the state’s history should be preserved. Over the years, some of us had found the records of earlier intelligence agencies and political policing invaluable – to illuminate the conflicted histories of Australia in wartime, for example. -
Llllllllllllllll!/Lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 3 4067 02569 8258 L�I V �Z-�0 ·A� W {)!;
lllllllllllllllllllllllll!/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 3 4067 02569 8258 l�i v �Z-�0 ·A� w {)!; .-.. .. .'' f! HEF�RE ..... \)� I SlEEP ... ...... RayWhitrod was born in Adelaide in 1915. He matriculated fromhigh school dur ing the Depression. While cycling around South Australian Riverlands in a vain attempt to find work as a fruit-picker he learnt of a scheme to recruit teenagers as police cadets. Thus began a police career- interrupted by war service and a stint with ASIO- that led to his appointments as the Conunissioner of the Commonwealth, Papua New Guinea, and, subsequently, the Commissioner of Queensland Police Force. After seven hard years trying to eliminate mal practice in the Queensland force, Ray Whitrod was forcibly presented by the Bjelke-Petersen government with a deputy conunissioner, whom he knew to be deeply corrupt. Whitrod resigned in protest in 1976� Ray Whitrod was active in the establishment of the South Australian Victims of Crime Service. He has had a lifelong involvement with Scouting and has been awarded many hon ours, including appointment as Companion of the Order of Australia and a doctorate from the Australian National Uni versity. But once, when asked on ABC Radio what he person ally regarded as his finest achievement, he replied, "Marrying Mavis." RAY· BEF�RE WHITR�ll I SlEEP Memoirs of a Modern Police Commissioner University of Queensland Press SS&H .o1296644 [Man o gt"'aph s J 2001 Received on : 12-02-02 First published 2001 by University of Queensland Press Box 6042, St Lucia, Queensland 4067 Australia www.uqp.uq.edu.au © Ray Whitrod This book is copyright.Ex cept for private study, research, criticism or reviews, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. -
Fitzgerald S Impact on the International Anti-Corruption
From Deep North to International Governance Exemplar: Fitzgerald's Impact on the International Anti-Corruption Movement Author Sampford, Charles Published 2009 Journal Title Griffith Law Review Copyright Statement © 2009 Griffith Law School. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/33845 Link to published version https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rlaw20/18/3?nav=tocList Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au FROM DEEP NORTH TO INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE EXEMPLAR Fitzgeraldʼs Impact on the International Anti-Corruption Movement Charles Sampford * In pre-Fitzgerald Queensland, the existence of corruption was widely known but its extent and modes of operation were not fully evident. The Fitzgerald Report identified the need for reform of the structure, procedures and efficiency in public administration in Queensland. What was most striking in the Queensland reform process was that a new model for combatting corruption had been developed. Rather than rely upon a single law and a single institution, existing institutions were strengthened and new institutions were introduced to create a set of mutually supporting and mutually checking institutions, agencies and laws that jointly sought to improve governmental standards and combat corruption. Some of the reforms were either unique to Queensland or very rare. One of the strengths of this approach was that it avoided creating a single over-arching institution to fight corruption. There are many powerful opponents of reform. Influential institutions and individuals resist any interference with their privileges. -
Decisions of the 1976 Cabinet
Annual Release of Cabinet Minutes Selected highlights of 1976 Cabinet Minutes by Dr David Solomon AM These appear to be the most important/relevant decisions taken by the Queensland Cabinet during 1976, taking into account both the circumstances of the time, and the advantages of historical hindsight now extending over 30 years. It should be noted that often Cabinet will have assessed the merits of a particular decision on the basis of material that is not included in the submission before it: the relevant background might be political (in a partisan way) and/or the circumstances may be very familiar to ministers, and not need to be spelt out. In some instances the most important political developments during the year may not be the subject of a Cabinet decision or discussion of any kind. For example, during 1976 the long-serving respected Liberal leader, Deputy Premier and Treasurer Sir Gordon Chalk, decided to retire. There is no reference to this in the Cabinet record, other than a change in the names of those entitled to receive Cabinet material. Nor is there any reference to the decision of the Premier to carry out a minor reshuffle, displacing the then Minister for Police. Nor to differences within the Coaltion over the allocation of portfolios that followed the election of the new Liberal Leader. There is a reference to three by-elections, but only to record the dates on which they would be held. Those interested would have to go elsewhere to discover the results of the by-elections, or, for example, the fact that the National Party endorsed a candidate in the electorate of Clayfield against Liberal and Labor candidates. -
Detoxifying Queensland's Political System
Enduring change: Detoxifying Queensland's political system Author Williams, Paul Published 2019 Book Title Griffith Review 65 Crimes and Punishments Version Accepted Manuscript (AM) Copyright Statement © 2019 Griffith University & the Author. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owner(s) for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author(s). Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/396903 Link to published version https://www-griffithreview-com/articles/enduring-change/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Enduring change: Detoxifying Queensland's political system By Paul D Williams Public inquiries and their subsequent reports suffer chequered histories in Australia. Some disappear with nary a trace, while others go on to effect real and lasting change. Why some inquiries succeed and others fail largely depends on the political context and public mood at an inquiry’s calling, the breadth of that inquiry’s terms of reference, the comprehensiveness of its recommendations and the political will of governments to act on those recommendations. There’s little doubt, for example, that Australians today hope the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission into the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, released in February this year, will not just curtail sharp practice, but force financial institutions to treat clients as people first and customers second. This July marked exactly thirty years since one of Australia’s most far- reaching reports was handed down. Officially titled the Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct, the Fitzgerald report brought lasting, monumental change to Queensland public life. -
Chapter 6 Qld 190614Reduced Proofed Endnotes
Chapter 6 – Queensland Expanding freedom from the centre outwards Of all the Australian states, Queensland has garnered a reputation for being particularly prone to excessive restrictions on civil liberties, sometimes through legislation but frequently through authoritarianism in politics and/or policing. In truth though, Queensland has contributed significant positives as well as negatives to the cause of freedom. The Indigenous people are believed to have walked across Torres Strait and on to the continent of Australia some 50,000 or more years ago. Then about 250 years ago, in the same general area at the top of the main Australian land mass, Captain James Cook declared that he took possession of the east coast of the large island “by the name New South Wales” while surveying the western sea ahead from atop a steep hill on a barren small islet he named “Possession Island”. But, despite a colourful artwork created 90 years later, there is doubt whether such a naming ceremony occurred on that day, 22 August 1770, or in that picturesque way. It is claimed the “ceremony” was an afterthought by Cook, added while in Batavia to ensure prior claim to all the coastal territory he had mapped over French explorers known to be active in the region. For the local Kaurareg people, it made no difference: they called the island Bedanug, as they do to this day. Captain Cook raises the Union Flag on Possession Island, 22 August 1770. – John Alexander Gilfillan, created about 1859 for the Philosophical Society of Victoria . (personal library of John C. Vaughan) The state has been a frontier battleground for liberties, rights and justice for more than 150 years. -
Archived Content Contenu Archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. ISSUE 3 Dec 2011 Inside this issue: Feature Editorial Feature Editorial: Does the Mafia Collect Art? Exploring Questions About Organised Art Crime............. 1 Does the Mafia Collect Art? Exploring Out and About.......... 3 Some Questions About Organised Art Crime CEPS 2011 Conference.......... 4 Prof. -
The Fitzgerald Inquiry Report
REPORT OF A COMMISSION OF INQUIRY PURSUANT TO ORDERS IN COUNCIL DATED: (i) 26May 1987 (ii) 24 June 1987 (iii) 25 August 1988 (iv) 29 June 1989 Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct 3 July, 1989 The Honourable M. J. Ahern M.L.A. Premier and Treasurer and Minister for State Development and the Arts Premier’s Department Executive Building 100 George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Premier, I herewith submit my report in respect of the matters set out in the Order in Council of 26 May 1987 as amended by the Orders in Council of 24 June 1987, 25 August 1988 and 29 June 1989. Yours faithfully G. E. FITZGERALD (Chairman) P.O. Box 157. North Quav. Brisbane. 4002 Secretary: Mr G. L. L nch Level 6, 160 Ann Street, brisbane, 4000 Telephone: (07) 221 2261 Telephone: (07) 221 2261 Facsimile: (07) 221 3593 Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct 3 July, 1989 The Honourable T. R. Cooper M.L.A. Minister for Police and Minister for Emergency Services and Administrative Services 3 1st Floor M.L.C. Centre 239 George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Minister, I herewith submit my report in respect of the matters set out in the Order in Council of 26 May 1987 as amended by the Orders in Council of 24 June 1987, 25 August 1988 and 29 June 1989. Yours faithfully G. E. FITZGERALD (Chairman) P.O. Box 157, North Quay, Brisbane, 4002 Secretary: Mr G. L. L nch Level 6, 160 Ann Street, Brisbane, 4000 Telephone: (07) 221 2261 Telephone: (07) 221 2261 Facsimile: (07) 221 3593 (iii) SUMMARY OF CONTENTS I . -
Corrupt Police Networks: Uncovering Hidden Relationship Patterns, Functions and Roles
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Lauchs, Mark, Keast, Robyn,& Yousefpour, Nina (2011) Corrupt police networks: Uncovering hidden relationship patterns, func- tions and roles. Policing and Society, 21(1), pp. 110-127. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41539/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540656 Corrupt Police Networks: Uncovering hidden relationship patterns, functions and roles Dr Mark Lauchs School of Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Dr Robyn Keast School of Management, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Nina Yousefpour School of Management, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Contact person: Dr Mark Lauchs , QUT, PO Box 2434, Brisbane QLD 4001. -
REFORM in POLITICS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE and the POLICE in POST-FITZGERALD QUEENSLAND an Assessment
REFORM IN POLITICS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND THE POLICE IN POST-FITZGERALD QUEENSLAND An Assessment Tim Prenzler* This article reviews the main recommendations and reforms emanating from the 1989 Fitzgerald Inquiry in Queensland. The ups and downs of the reform process are chronicled under the three headings of ʻpoliticsʼ, ʻcriminal justiceʼ and ʻpoliceʼ. In politics, there has been a retreat from Fitzgeraldʼs vision for integrity in government, evidenced by bias in the electoral system, the failure to establish transparency in government decision-making, violations of appointment by merit, and the politicisation of policing. In criminal justice, major hypocrisies and inefficiencies remain in the operation of the law, with a regressive approach to crime reduction through over- reliance on imprisonment. In policing, the Fitzgerald vision for community policing was never implemented at the local level, and the pre-Fitzgerald model of police investigating police remains dominant. The article is focused on describing the nature and extent of the subversion of reform, with some reference to two contributing factors. The first is the gap between the general principles articulated in the Fitzgerald Report and the specific wording of its recommendations. The second concerns the power culture of the Australian Labor Party, whose winner-takes-all philosophy has triumphed over participatory democracy. The Fitzgerald Inquiry produced a watershed report for democracy and criminal justice in Queensland. The report was intended to usher in a bold new age of transparency, innovation and integrity in politics and public sector management. Instead, the last 20 years have seen a series of stop–go efforts to implement reform and an overall retreat from the Fitzgerald vision of open and accountable government. -
A History of Australian Federal Police (Incorporating the Australian Protective Services)
ArchivesACT Research Guide A History of Australian Federal Police (incorporating the Australian Protective Services) The following is a table of key dates in the history of the Commonwealth and Australian Federal Police Forces. This document has been prepared by Outsource Australia as part of a records disposal project for the AFP, in conjunction with the National Archives of Australia. Source Number details are listed at the end of the document. Disclaimer The attached document, entitled 'A History of the Australian Federal Police (incorporating the Australian Protective Services)' was created by the AFP in 2003 as part of a process associated with the management of records. The document was created to provide an overview of the origins of the AFP and to assist with its records archiving and retention needs. This document is not a complete formal history of the AFP or its predecessors, and provides no more than key dates throughout its history. The information contained within the document was correct, at the time the document was created. Date Comments Source Number 1883 A Police presence was established in Canberra 14, 33 district. 1 January 1911 The Federal Capital Territory was proclaimed. NSW 14, 33, 159 Police continued to undertake policing duties in the (page 9), 304 Federal Capital Territory (until 1927). 1917 The Special Intelligence Bureau (SIB) was created as a 159 branch of the Imperial Secret Service under the direct control of the Governor-General. 29 November Prime Minister William Morris Hughes was pelted 159 (pages 3 1917 with an egg in Warwick, Queensland. A plain-clothed – 5) policeman who was present refused to help the Prime Minister as he claimed to only recognise the laws of Queensland. -
Australian Criminological Research
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ·~ ,---.~-.- ... -.-.. -, National Criminal Justice Reference Service r- - ---\, nCJrs It ., , .. , I ~-- , ! It This microfiche was produced from documents received for I ! ., ! inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise I " control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, T ,-- r " 11 It the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on I. _. , .,.. ! , ~ ., this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. -,- -- t It ! .. " -- • -- 1 5 [M,g 1.0 U.S. Department of Justice 82186 l!M~ "'" 2.8 "'"3. II -.'- 111~3.2 2.2 National Institute of Justice This document .has been reproduced exactly as received from the pe~~?n ~r orgam~ation originating It. Points of view or opinions stated In IS ocumen! are those of the authors and do not necessaril reprt~sent the official position or poliCies of the National Institute OYf III"~ Jus Ice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi crofiche only has ~een granted by Austra11an Instltute of 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 Cr1mlnology to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). ~urther reprodu~tion outside of the NCJRS system requires permis sion of the cOPYright owner. MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-J963-A p Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.