Forelimb Joint Mobility and the Evolution of Wing-Propelled Diving in Birds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forelimb Joint Mobility and the Evolution of Wing-Propelled Diving in Birds FORELIMB JOINT MOBILITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF WING-PROPELLED DIVING IN BIRDS ROBERTJ. RAIKOW? 2 LESLEYBICANOVSKY, • AND ANTHONY H. BLEDSOE •'2 1Departmentof BiologicalSciences, University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA, and 2TheCarnegie Museum of NaturalHistory, 4400 ForbesAvenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 USA ABSTRACT.--Wemeasured wing joint mobility in penguins,alcids, diving-petrels, and non- diving fliers.Great reduction in mobility of the intrinsicwing jointswas found in penguins, but not in alcids or diving-petrels.This reduction is correlatedwith simplificationof the intrinsicwing musculature.In contrast,alcids and diving-petrels,which usetheir wings in both air and water, retain the full functional capacitiesfor flight. Movement through the air probably requiresa capability for subtleand varied motions,forces, and shapechanges that precludestiffening and simplificationof the wing. Hence, the conversionof an aerial wing to a flipper,as in penguins,must be possibleonly after the evolutionaryloss of flight. Received 23 September1987, accepted 2 February1988. WING-PROPELLEDdiving has evolved at least in penguins. The limb and its skeleton are flat- five times in birds: in the penguins (Sphenis- tened, and the wing is reduced in surface area cidae), auks (Alcidae), diving-petrels (Pelecan- by the lossof differentiated flight feathers,pa- oididae), the extinct Plotopteridae (Olson and tagia, and the alula. The shoulder joint and the Hasegawa 1979), and the dippers (Cinclidae; extrinsicmuscles of the wing are functionally Goodge 1959). The penguins are flightless, as specialized (Bannasch1986a, b, 1987), and the were the plotopterids,the Miocene Lucasauks limb is relatively rigid becausejoint mobility is (Mancallinae), and the recent great auks (Pin- restricted. In all, the wing is converted to a guinus).The diving-petrelsand all living alcids, "flipper" similar in external form to those of however, practice both aerial and underwater other aquatic tetrapods. locomotion. Simpson (1946: 84-92) maintained No detailed analysesof the relationship be- that living alcids and diving-petrels represent tween wing structure and the idea of compro- a stage in the evolution of flightlessnessand mise has been made for forms such as the div- wing-propelled diving through which the ing-petrels and volant alcids. Hudson et al. ancestorof penguins passed.Storer (1960) sug- (1969) describedthe wing musclesof alcidsand gestedfurther that flying auks and diving-pe- suggested(without functional explanation)that trels represent a "compromise" stage between somefeatures might be related to diving. Spring birds well adapted for locomotion in air and in (1971) describedunderwater swimming in two water. speciesof the alcid genusUria. Storer (1960:fig. Becausethe optimum design of the propul- 4) used illustrationsof wing skeletonsof a gull sire organsis differentfor the two media,which (Larus),Razorbill (Alca), Great Auk (Pinguinus), differ substantiallyin densityand buoyancy,an LucasAuk (Mancalla),and penguin (Spheniscus) intermediateadaptive stage probably would in- to represent stagesin the evolution of the ex- volve a lossof efficiencyin eachmedium as the treme aquatic specialization,showing a trend priceof adequacyin the other.Neither Simpson for increasedflattening of the bones and loss nor Storer elaborated on the anatomical corre- of the alula. Pennycuick(1987) suggestedthat latesof a "compromise"wing. If their views are auksand diving-petrelshave reduced wing areas correct, one might expect intermediate stages asadaptations for propulsion through media of to approach some of the anatomical features of greatly different densities. submarine specialists. Storer did not addressa concomitantspecial- The extreme of underwater adaptation occurs ization, the stiffening of the wing through a 446 The Auk 105:446-451. July 1988 July1988] ForelimbJoint Mobility 447 reduction in the ranges of motion of the joints. that deformation through stretchingof the tissuesdid Stiffening may prevent distortion of the wing not occur during measurement. during movement through the dense aquatic medium. That this is a problem is suggestedby RESULTS the observationthat dippersand aukskeep their wings partly folded when swimming (Goodge Jointmobility.--We obtained arcsof motion at 1959, Spring 1971). four joints for 11 volant speciesthat do not use Studies of underwater propulsion indicate their wings underwater, 2 speciesof diving- that alcidsemploy a different method from that petrels,9 of alcids,and 7 of penguins (Table 1). of penguins. In alcids the manus stays in the For all four motions the values in alcids,diving- flexed position during the propulsivestroke, in petrels, and nondiving fliers were similar and which the wing movesdown and backward in overlappedbroadly. In penguinsthe mean val- a rowing action (Spring 1971). In penguins the uesfor flexion of the forearm,manus, and major manus is extended, the wing is rotated so that digit were substantiallylower than those for the leading edge is lower than the trailing edge alcids,diving-petrels, and nondiving fliers, and in the downstroke, which entails little caudal did not overlap the values for these groups. For movement of the wing, and the upstrokeis used protraction of the humerus, the values for pen- to generatethrust as well (Clark and Bemis1979). guins overlappedthe lowest three valuesamong Thus,with regardto methodof underwater pro- the nondiving fliers and the lowestvalue of the pulsion, alcids and penguins can be considered set of alcids. The penguin average values, how- convergent only in the most general sense. ever, were lower than the values for these We attempted to determine whether species groups.Bannasch (1986a) reported a lower es- capableof both flight and wing-propelled div- timate (45ø ) for this motion but, unlike our ing show attributes of wing structure conver- method, limited the fully protractedposition to gent to those of penguins. We measured and a line perpendicular to the body axis. comparedwing-joint mobility in penguins,oth- The mean arc and 95% confidence limits of er wing-propelled divers, and nondiving fliers, the mean for flexion of the forearm, protraction and related thesefindings to differencesin the of the humerus, flexion of the manus, and flex- wing musculature. The results are discussedin ion of the major digit for each speciesare de- relationto the evolutionarytransformation from picted in Figs. 1-4. The reduction in forearm aerial to submarine propulsion. flexion of penguins differed dramatically from the other species(Fig. 1). This pattern was typ- MATERIALS AND METHODS ical of flexion of the manusand major digit as well (Figs. 3 and 4). The values for flexion of The range of motion was measuredat the shoulder,. the forearm in alcids and diving-petrels ap- elbow, wrist, and major digit of specimensthat were peared slightly larger on average than for the frozen while freshly dead and subsequentlythawed nondiving fliers (Fig. 1). The penguinsalso had in a refrigerator 2-5 days (depending on size) before a slightly reduced protraction of the humerus measurement.Each specimenwas placed on its back comparedwith the other species(Fig. 2). on a table, and the right wing was extendedflat over a sheet of paper. To measuremotion at eachjoint, the To test for these and other possible differ- proximal element was held securely in place, the po- encesin the arcsof movement, the species(Ta- sition of the joint was marked,and the distal element ble 1) were allocatedto three categories:diving was moved through the range of motion until the nonfliers (penguins), diving fliers (alcids and joint resisted further movement. These points were diving-petrels), and nondiving fliers (remain- marked, and the arc thus circumscribed was measured ing species,including Melanitta nigra, a foot- with a protractor. This was taken as an estimate of propelled diver). For eachmeasurement a group the normal arc of motion. To reduce variation in tech- mean was calculated(Table 2), and a one-way nique, one person (the senior author) moved the ele- analysis of variance was performed. For pro- ment through the range of motion while the other traction of the humerus and flexion of the ma- workersmaintained the specimenin placeand marked the positions. Replicate estimates varied, and each nus, the difference between the mean for pen- measurementwas repeated 10 times and a mean arc guins and that for each other category was of motion was calculated.Although the tissueswere statisticallysignificant (P < 0.05). For flexion of compliant,we observedno pattern of increasein the the forearm and major digit the variancesof the estimatedarc during a seriesof replicates,indicating means were heteroscedastic(Bartlett's box F test 448 R•Kow, B•c^•ovsK¾,^•D BLEDSOE [Auk, Vol. 105 T^BLE1. Range of motion in avian wing joints.a Protraction of Flexion of Flexion of Speciesno. humerus forearm Flexion of manus majordigit Spheniscidae I Aptenodytespatagonica 103 (97-106) 23 (17-34) 22 (18-26) 12 (11-15) 2 Aptenodytesforsteri 92 (88-102) 14 (13-18) 13 (10-15) 14 (12-19) 3 Pygoscelispapua 65 (57-72) 26 (20-34) 29 (24-34) 25 (20-31) 4 Pygoscelisadeliae I 100 (91-106) 25 (20-32) 25 (22-29) 17 (13-21) 5 Pygoscelisadeliae 2 27 (20-32) 23 (19-26) 19 (11-23) 6 Pygoscelisantarctica 73 (67-82) 25 (20-30) 21 (19-22) 21 (16-27) 7 Eudyptescrestatus 92 (83-106) 34 (28-37) 30 (25-35) 26 (22-30) 8 Eudypteschrysolophus 62 (57-68) 26 (22-31) 27 (24-31) 16 (14-20) Pelecanoididae 9 Pelecanoidesurinatrix 144 (120-155)
Recommended publications
  • Breeding Ecology and Extinction of the Great Auk (Pinguinus Impennis): Anecdotal Evidence and Conjectures
    THE AUK A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY VOL. 101 JANUARY1984 No. 1 BREEDING ECOLOGY AND EXTINCTION OF THE GREAT AUK (PINGUINUS IMPENNIS): ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURES SVEN-AXEL BENGTSON Museumof Zoology,University of Lund,Helgonavi•en 3, S-223 62 Lund,Sweden The Garefowl, or Great Auk (Pinguinusimpen- Thus, the sad history of this grand, flightless nis)(Frontispiece), met its final fate in 1844 (or auk has received considerable attention and has shortly thereafter), before anyone versed in often been told. Still, the final episodeof the natural history had endeavoured to study the epilogue deservesto be repeated.Probably al- living bird in the field. In fact, no naturalist ready before the beginning of the 19th centu- ever reported having met with a Great Auk in ry, the GreatAuk wasgone on the westernside its natural environment, although specimens of the Atlantic, and in Europe it was on the were occasionallykept in captivity for short verge of extinction. The last few pairs were periods of time. For instance, the Danish nat- known to breed on some isolated skerries and uralist Ole Worm (Worm 1655) obtained a live rocks off the southwesternpeninsula of Ice- bird from the Faroe Islands and observed it for land. One day between 2 and 5 June 1844, a several months, and Fleming (1824) had the party of Icelanderslanded on Eldey, a stackof opportunity to study a Great Auk that had been volcanic tuff with precipitouscliffs and a flat caught on the island of St. Kilda, Outer Heb- top, now harbouring one of the largestsgan- rides, in 1821. nettles in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum Dive Depths Attained by South Georgia Diving Petrel Pelecanoides Georgicus at Bird Island, South Georgia
    Antarctic Science 4 (4): 433434 (1992) Short note Maximum dive depths attained by South Georgia diving petrel Pelecanoides georgicus at Bird Island, South Georgia P.A. PRINCE and M. JONES British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET Accepted 25 September 1992 Introduction Maximum dive depths have been recorded for a number of powder was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm. Maximum sea-bird species using simple lightweight capillary gauges depth attained was calculated by the equation: (Burger & Wilson 1988). So far these studies have been dmax= 10.08 ($ -1) confined to penguins (Montague 1985, Seddon &vanHeezik d 1990, Whitehead 1989, Wilson & Wilson 1990, Scolaro & where dmaxismaximumdepth (m)Lsis theinitial length (mm) Suburo 1991), alcids (Burger & Simpson 1986, Burger & of undissolved indicator andL, the length (mm) on recovery Powell 1988, Harris etal. 1990,Burger 1991)andcormorants (Burger & Wilson 1988). (Burger 1991, Wanless et al. 1991). The most proficient divers of the order Procellariformes Results are likely to be thedivingpetrels in the family Pelecanoididae. Although the diet of some species has been studied (Payne & The results are shown in Table I. For all six gauges the mean Prince 1979), their divingperformance and foraging ecology maximumdepthdived was25.7m sd 11.4 (range=17.1-48.6). are unknown. This paper reports the first data on maximum If only the four gauges recovered within 24 h are considered depths attained by South Georgia divingpetrelsp. georgicus then the mean maximum dive depth is reduced to 21.3 m sd (weighing less than 1OOg) while engaged in rearing chicks.
    [Show full text]
  • How Plesiosaurs Swam: New Insights Into Their Underwater Flight Using “Ava”, a Virtual Pliosaur
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 9 October 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201910.0094.v1 How Plesiosaurs Swam: New Insights into Their Underwater Flight Using “Ava”, a Virtual Pliosaur Max Hawthorne1,*, Mark A. S. McMenamin 2, Paul de la Salle3 1Far From The Tree Press, LLC, 4657 York Rd., #952, Buckingham, PA, 18912, United States 2Department of Geology and Geography, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts, United States 3Swindon, England *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 267-337-7545 Abstract Analysis of plesiosaur swim dynamics by means Further study attempted to justify the use of all four flippers of a digital 3D armature (wireframe “skeleton”) of a simultaneously via the use of paddle-generated vortices, pliosauromorph (“Ava”) demonstrates that: 1, plesiosaurs which require specific timing to achieve optimal additional used all four flippers for primary propulsion; 2, plesiosaurs thrust. These attempts have largely relied on anatomical utilized all four flippers simultaneously; 3, respective pairs studies of strata-compressed plesiosaur skeletons, and/or of flippers of Plesiosauridae, front and rear, traveled through preconceived notions as pertains to the paddles’ inherent distinctive, separate planes of motion, and; 4, the ability to ranges of motion [8, 10-12]. What has not been considered utilize all four paddles simultaneously allowed these largely are the opposing angles of the pectoral and pelvic girdles, predatory marine reptiles to achieve a significant increase in which strongly indicate varied-yet-complementing relations acceleration and speed, which, in turn, contributed to their between the front and rear sets of paddles, both in repose and sustained dominance during the Mesozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Northeastern Atlantic Ocean Basin Record of an Auk (Charadriiformes, Pan-Alcidae): Fossil Remains from the Miocene of Germany
    J Ornithol (2013) 154:775–782 DOI 10.1007/s10336-013-0943-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Earliest northeastern Atlantic Ocean basin record of an auk (Charadriiformes, Pan-Alcidae): fossil remains from the Miocene of Germany N. Adam Smith • Gerald Mayr Received: 26 November 2012 / Accepted: 28 February 2013 / Published online: 21 March 2013 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2013 Abstract Newly discovered fossil remains of an auk Zusammenfassung (Aves, Charadriiformes) extend the temporal range of Pan- Alcidae in the northeastern Atlantic Ocean basin and the Fru¨hester Nachweis eines Alkenvogels (Charadriifor- geographic range of the clade during the Miocene. The new mes, Pan-Alcidae) im nordo¨stlichen Atlantik: Fossil- specimen consists of a partial ulna and a radius of a single reste aus dem Mioza¨n Deutschlands individual. It represents the earliest fossil auk from the northeastern Atlantic Ocean basin and the first fossil Ku¨rzlich entdeckte Fossilreste eines Alken (Aves, Cha- remains of an auk reported from Germany. The specimen is radriiformes) erweitern das bekannte zeitliche Vorkommen from a moderately sized auk similar to the extant Razorbill der Pan-Alcidae im nordo¨stlichen Atlantik und das geo- Alca torda, which it also resembles in morphological fea- graphische Verbreitungsgebiet der Gruppe wa¨hrend des tures. A definitive taxonomic referral of the fossil is not Mioza¨ns. Das neue Exemplar besteht aus einem Ulnafrag- possible, but the presence of Alca in the Miocene of the ment und einem Radius eines einzigen Individuums. Es northeastern Atlantic Ocean basin would be congruent with stellt den a¨ltesten fossilen Alken aus dem Nordostatlantik the occurrence of this taxon in the northwestern Atlantic at dar und den ersten Fossilrest eines Alken aus Deutschland.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocation of Growth in Food-Stressed Atlantic Puffin Chicks
    The Auk 113(4):830-841, 1996 ALLOCATION OF GROWTH IN FOOD-STRESSED ATLANTIC PUFFIN CHICKS HILDE STOL •JYAN • AND TYCHO ANKER-NILSSEN NorwegianInstitute for NatureResearch, Tungasletta 2, N-7005 Trondheim,Norway ABSTt•CT.--In long-lived seabirdsthat lay a single-eggclutch, allocation of growth to certain body parts may be advantageousfor the chick if food is limited. To investigatethis, 40 Atlantic Puffin (Fraterculaarctica) hatchlings were distributedin sevengroups that were raisedon differentamounts of food to 38 daysof age.When food intakewas reduced,growth rateswere depressedfor all charactersmeasured (i.e. body massand length of the wing, 2nd primary, forearm, head + bill, culmen, skull, tarsus,and middle toe). Head and wing parts grew preferentiallyrelative to the other characters,and onsetof growth was delayedin the primaries.All chicksaccumulated significant amounts of subcutaneousfat, whereasinternal fat depositswere presentonly in the chicksthat receivedthe mostfood. Received14 July1995, accepted20 March 1996. ONEWAY that parent birds adjustfor variation The wide variation in chick growth rates in food availability is to vary clutch size (Lack among speciesof alcids has been attributed to 1954,1966, 1968). In long-livedspecies that lay constraintson feeding ecology, such as spe- a single-eggclutch, alteration of chick growth cialized foraging behaviors,unpredictable and rate apparentlyis the only strategyavailable to patchy food distributions, and great distances adjust for variation in food. Slow growth re- between feeding and nesting sites (Lack 1968; duces daily energy requirements and allows Ricklefs 1968, 1984;Ashmole 1971;Sealy 1973; food to be delivered at a lower rate (Lack 1968; Nelson 1977; Birkhead and Harris 1985). Thus, Ricklefs 1968, 1979; Harris 1977; Nelson 1977; chicks of pelagic alcids often face the problem Drent and Daan 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Fins, Limbs, and Tails: Outgrowths and Axial Patterning in Vertebrate Evolution Michael I
    Review articles Fins, limbs, and tails: outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution Michael I. Coates1* and Martin J. Cohn2 Summary Current phylogenies show that paired fins and limbs are unique to jawed verte- brates and their immediate ancestry. Such fins evolved first as a single pair extending from an anterior location, and later stabilized as two pairs at pectoral and pelvic levels. Fin number, identity, and position are therefore key issues in vertebrate developmental evolution. Localization of the AP levels at which develop- mental signals initiate outgrowth from the body wall may be determined by Hox gene expression patterns along the lateral plate mesoderm. This regionalization appears to be regulated independently of that in the paraxial mesoderm and axial skeleton. When combined with current hypotheses of Hox gene phylogenetic and functional diversity, these data suggest a new model of fin/limb developmental evolution. This coordinates body wall regions of outgrowth with primitive bound- aries established in the gut, as well as the fundamental nonequivalence of pectoral and pelvic structures. BioEssays 20:371–381, 1998. ௠ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction over and again to exemplify fundamental concepts in biological Vertebrate appendages include an amazing diversity of form, theory. The striking uniformity of teleost pectoral fin skeletons from the huge wing-like fins of manta rays or the stumpy limbs of illustrated Geoffroy Saint-Hilair’s discussion of ‘‘special analo- frogfishes, to ichthyosaur paddles, the extraordinary fingers of gies,’’1 while tetrapod limbs exemplified Owen’s2 related concept aye-ayes, and the fin-like wings of penguins. The functional of ‘‘homology’’; Darwin3 then employed precisely the same ex- diversity of these appendages is similarly vast and, in addition to ample as evidence of evolutionary descent from common ances- various modes of locomotion, fins and limbs are also used for try.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolphin P-K Teacher's Guide
    Dolphin P-K Teacher’s Guide Table of Contents ii Goal and Objectives iii Message to Our Teacher Partners 1 Dolphin Overview 3 Dolphin Activities 23 Dolphin Discovery Dramatic Play 7 Which Animals Live with 25 Dolphins? Picture This: Dolphin Mosaic 9 Pod Count 27 Dolphins on the Move 13 How Do They Measure Up? 31 Where Do I Live? Food Search 15 dorsal dorsal 35 Dolphin or fin peduncle Other Sea Creature? median blowhole notch posterior Build a anterior fluke17s melon 37 pectoral Dolphin Recycling flipper eye rostrum ear Can Make a bottlenose dolphin Difference! 19 ventral lengDolphinth = 10-14 feet / 3-4.2 meters Hokeypokey 41 d Vocabularyi p h o l n Goal and Message to Our Objectives Teacher Partners At l a n t i s , Paradise Island, strives to inspire students to learn Goal: Students will develop an understanding of what a more about the ocean that surrounds dolphin is and where it lives. them in The Bahamas. Through interactive, interdisciplinary activities in the classroom and at Atlantis, we endeavor to help students develop an understanding of the marine world along with Upon the completion of the Dolphin W e a r e the desire to conserve it and its wildlife. Dolphin Cay Objectives: provides students with a thrilling and inspirational program, students will be able to: a resource for you. Atlantis, Paradise Island, offers opportunity to learn about dolphins and their undersea a variety of education programs on world as well as ways they can help conserve them. themes such as dolphins, coral reefs, sharks, Through students’ visit to Atlantis, we hope to Determine which animals live in the ocean like dolphins.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinels of the Ocean the Science of the World’S Penguins
    A scientific report from The Pew Charitable Trusts April 2015 Sentinels Of the Ocean The science of the world’s penguins Contents 1 Overview 1 Status of penguin populations 1 Penguin biology Species 3 22 The Southern Ocean 24 Threats to penguins Fisheries 24 Increasing forage fisheries 24 Bycatch 24 Mismatch 24 Climate change 25 Habitat degradation and changes in land use 25 Petroleum pollution 25 Guano harvest 26 Erosion and loss of native plants 26 Tourism 26 Predation 26 Invasive predators 26 Native predators 27 Disease and toxins 27 27 Protecting penguins Marine protected areas 27 Ecosystem-based management 29 Ocean zoning 29 Habitat protections on land 30 31 Conclusion 32 References This report was written for Pew by: Pablo García Borboroglu, Ph.D., president, Global Penguin Society P. Dee Boersma, Ph.D., director, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Caroline Cappello, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Pew’s environmental initiative Joshua S. Reichert, executive vice president Tom Wathen, vice president Environmental science division Becky Goldburg, Ph.D., director, environmental science Rachel Brittin, officer, communications Polita Glynn, director, Pew Marine Fellows Program Ben Shouse, senior associate Charlotte Hudson, director, Lenfest Ocean Program Anthony Rogers, senior associate Katie Matthews, Ph.D., manager Katy Sater, senior associate Angela Bednarek, Ph.D., manager Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the many contributors to Penguins: Natural History and Conservation (University of Washington Press, 2013), upon whose scholarship this report is based. Used by permission of the University of Washington Press The environmental science team would like to thank Dee Boersma, Pablo “Popi” Borboroglu, and Caroline Cappello for sharing their knowledge of penguins by writing and preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • FORELIMB LAMENESS: the GREAT IMPERSONATOR Juliette Hart, DVM, MS, CCRT, CVA Cornell University Veterinary Specialists
    FORELIMB LAMENESS: THE GREAT IMPERSONATOR Juliette Hart, DVM, MS, CCRT, CVA Cornell University Veterinary Specialists. Stamford, CT Diagnosis of forelimb lameness in canine patients can often be a labor-intensive and time- consuming process, often with multiple factors being taken into account, regardless of the actual diagnosis. The dog’s age, activity level, co-morbidities, job and environment can be key players. Close examination of the dog in motion (in hospital and at home) can be helpful when determining type and degree of lameness, and may frequently assist the clinician in determining next appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment plans. This lecture will focus on differentials associated with forelimb lameness in dogs, current diagnostic tests and potential treatments available, and finally prognoses and outcomes for specific types of shoulder forelimb lameness in dogs. Lameness Evaluation The forelimb skeleton consists of the thoracic or pectoral girdle and the bones of the forelimb. The canine scapula itself is positioned close to the sagittal plane, and the humeral head is less rounded (as compared to the human head) to assist with weight bearing. The radius takes the majority of weight-bearing in the antebrachium. And, although small, the many sesamoid bones in the carpus/paw allow for biomechanically advantageous alignment of angles of insertion of tendons at their attachments.¹ While there can be tremendous variation in the sizes of the bones themselves comparing dog to dog, the literature have reported a roughly 60% body weight distribution in the thoracic limbs.² As a clinician evaluates a patient, lameness is a key element of that examination.
    [Show full text]
  • From Fin to Forelimb Crucially Showing That They Develop in Situ Rather Than Migrating to Their the Vertebrate Invasion of Land Was Cartilaginous Fish Such As Sharks
    NATURE|Vol 466|5 August 2010 NEWS & VIEWS Goulielmakis and colleagues1 characterized Figure 1 | The first attosecond probe the coherence, and thus the entanglement, of experiments. Goulielmakis et al.1 report a Kr+ and the lost electron. In their experiments, technique for observing electron motion in the intense, ultrashort pump pulse ensures real time. They irradiated krypton atoms (Kr) significant overlap of the two quantum states Kr+, 3d–1 with a ‘pump’ pulse of infrared light lasting a few femtoseconds, liberating electrons to of the removed electron that correlate with generate Kr+ ions in a superposition of two two different pathways in the ion’s subsystem states, 4p−1(J = 1/2) and 4p−1(J = 3/2), where J is (Fig. 1b), resulting in a low electron–ion entan- total angular momentum. Black arrows indicate glement, a high coherence of the hole’s wave the two ionization pathways. The authors then packet and high visibility of the interference Kr+, irradiated the ions with attosecond ‘probe’ pulses 4p–1(J=1/2) fringes. The ability to probe decoherence is a + of extreme-ultraviolet light, exciting them to a Kr , −1 very important aspect of the experiment. 4p–1(J=3/2) higher-energy 3d state; red and green arrows The authors’ experiment is reminiscent of a indicate the two possible excitation pathways. two-colour coherent-control scheme2. In such The complete system constitutes an entangled electron–ion pair. a, The different excitation schemes, population of a final state is controlled pathways taken by the ion to reach the 3d−1 by the relative phase between the two colours state may cause the liberated electrons to adopt of light needed to promote a system from two orthogonal quantum states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devonian Tetrapod Acanthostega Gunnari Jarvik: Postcranial Anatomy, Basal Tetrapod Interrelationships and Patterns of Skeletal Evolution M
    Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 87, 363-421, 1996 The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution M. I. Coates ABSTRACT: The postcranial skeleton of Acanthostega gunnari from the Famennian of East Greenland displays a unique, transitional, mixture of features conventionally associated with fish- and tetrapod-like morphologies. The rhachitomous vertebral column has a primitive, barely differentiated atlas-axis complex, encloses an unconstricted notochordal canal, and the weakly ossified neural arches have poorly developed zygapophyses. More derived axial skeletal features include caudal vertebral proliferation and, transiently, neural radials supporting unbranched and unsegmented lepidotrichia. Sacral and post-sacral ribs reiterate uncinate cervical and anterior thoracic rib morphologies: a simple distal flange supplies a broad surface for iliac attachment. The octodactylous forelimb and hindlimb each articulate with an unsutured, foraminate endoskeletal girdle. A broad-bladed femoral shaft with extreme anterior torsion and associated flattened epipodials indicates a paddle-like hindlimb function. Phylogenetic analysis places Acanthostega as the sister- group of Ichthyostega plus all more advanced tetrapods. Tulerpeton appears to be a basal stem- amniote plesion, tying the amphibian-amniote split to the uppermost Devonian. Caerorhachis may represent a more derived stem-amniote plesion. Postcranial evolutionary trends spanning the taxa traditionally associated with the fish-tetrapod transition are discussed in detail. Comparison between axial skeletons of primitive tetrapods suggests that plesiomorphic fish-like morphologies were re-patterned in a cranio-caudal direction with the emergence of tetrapod vertebral regionalisation. The evolution of digited limbs lags behind the initial enlargement of endoskeletal girdles, whereas digit evolution precedes the elaboration of complex carpal and tarsal articulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrapod Limb and Sarcopterygian Fin Regeneration Share a Core Genetic
    ARTICLE Received 28 Apr 2016 | Accepted 27 Sep 2016 | Published 2 Nov 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13364 OPEN Tetrapod limb and sarcopterygian fin regeneration share a core genetic programme Acacio F. Nogueira1,*, Carinne M. Costa1,*, Jamily Lorena1, Rodrigo N. Moreira1, Gabriela N. Frota-Lima1, Carolina Furtado2, Mark Robinson3, Chris T. Amemiya3,4, Sylvain Darnet1 & Igor Schneider1 Salamanders are the only living tetrapods capable of fully regenerating limbs. The discovery of salamander lineage-specific genes (LSGs) expressed during limb regeneration suggests that this capacity is a salamander novelty. Conversely, recent paleontological evidence supports a deeper evolutionary origin, before the occurrence of salamanders in the fossil record. Here we show that lungfishes, the sister group of tetrapods, regenerate their fins through morphological steps equivalent to those seen in salamanders. Lungfish de novo transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression analysis reveal notable parallels between lungfish and salamander appendage regeneration, including strong downregulation of muscle proteins and upregulation of oncogenes, developmental genes and lungfish LSGs. MARCKS-like protein (MLP), recently discovered as a regeneration-initiating molecule in salamander, is likewise upregulated during early stages of lungfish fin regeneration. Taken together, our results lend strong support for the hypothesis that tetrapods inherited a bona fide limb regeneration programme concomitant with the fin-to-limb transition. 1 Instituto de Cieˆncias Biolo´gicas, Universidade Federal do Para´, Rua Augusto Correa, 01, Bele´m66075-110,Brazil.2 Unidade Genoˆmica, Programa de Gene´tica, Instituto Nacional do Caˆncer, Rio de Janeiro 20230-240, Brazil. 3 Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, 1201 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA. 4 Department of Biology, University of Washington 106 Kincaid, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]