Journal of Cell Science and 55Lne rv,Mdsn I576 USA 53706, WI Madison, Drive, Linden 1525 rltv otedrcino irto)adrdaetwrsthe Straube, towards and radiate Kaverina and the 2004; nucleus migration) (Etienne-Manneville, the of from edge of direction leading front nucleate the in to (MTOC) generally (relative center non- In microtubules organizing and type. microtubule cell nucleate cells, the on microtubules depends leukocyte also where motility cell location during radiate the migrate migration, keratinocytes cell fish contrast, In 1984). Schliwa, 2005). and (Niggli, (Euteneuer microtubules al., directionality without directionally promotes their et 2005; it impairs Xu al., but 2003; whereas et neutrophils, Watanabe 2001), of 2009; Waterman-Storer, motility al., and et Small 2007; Vinogradova Wittmann Doe, 2002; and al., Siegrist Straube, 2009; et cell Keren, cells and and tumor Kaverina Mogilner fibroblasts, impairs 2004; 2011; as (Etienne-Manneville, such the cells neurons disassembly of and that types Microtubule many apparent type- in migration cell become manner. a major in has migration dependent the cell it regulates of cytoskeleton 1970). findings, microtubule al., et one (Vasiliev Vasiliev’s polarity cell migration that Since of cell regulation positive to shown the by contribute is microtubules has which mouse by fibroblasts cultured mechanisms than on Vasiliev More human of 2002). microtubule work al., and pioneering et the the ago, Small years 2003; and 40 al., adhesion, et (Rodriguez cytoskeleton, network actomyosin between interplay complex a the of result the is migration cell Directed Introduction those from rules different distinctly to the subject by are migration part words: cells neutrophil PI(3)K Key migratory in in professional microtubules least rapid these of at role of types. induced Microtubule motility the motility cell into and F-actin. the and insight other polarity that dynamic new edge for show neutrophil provide and established and results on leading vertebrate These stable effects activity. living the of their Rac a and distribution exert at in Rho microtubules the both activation that of by to regulation show (PI(3)K) neutrophils measured negative we of 3-kinase as Finally, attraction dynamics impaired motility. phosphoinositol disassembly F-actin independent polarized Microtubule of neutrophils. inhibited polarity motile regulate in the depolymerization migration) microtubules enhanced of of studies role how but direction in the the wounds seen However, study been to to has types. (relative system what nucleus zebrafish cell to the the contrast exploited many in we that, Here in revealing migration organisms. bioprobes, polarization living neutrophil in regulating particularly in understood, positively microtubules well not by is motility migration leukocyte cell control Microtubules Summary work this to equally ` contributed authors *These 1 Yoo Kan Sa and zebrafish polarity live neutrophil in in migration microtubules of role The 5702 o:10.1242/jcs.108324 doi: 5702–5710 125, Science Cell of Journal 2012 August 19 Accepted naHuttenlocher Anna uhrfrcrepnec ( correspondence for Author rga nClua n oeua Biology, Molecular and Cellular in Program 02 ulse yTeCmayo ilgssLtd Biologists of Company The by Published 2012. nadto otecnetdpnetrl fmcouue in microtubules of role context-dependent the to addition In 4 eateto Zoology, of Department hmtxs irtbl,Nurpi,Zebrafish Neutrophil, Microtubule, Chemotaxis, 1, ,Piyn Lam Pui-ying *, [email protected] 5,6, ` 5 eateto Pediatrics, of Department 1, ,Mr .Eichelberg R. Mark *, nvivo in ) 2 oeua n ellrPamclg rdaeProgram, Graduate Pharmacology Cellular and Molecular h oaiaino irtblswsvsaie nmtl etohl sn various using neutrophils motile in visualized was microtubules of localization The . 6 eateto eia irbooyadImnlg,Uiest fWisconsin-Madison, of University Immunology, and Microbiology Medical of Department 2 arnZasadil Lauren , nvitro in Lee l,20;Rte ta. 97 erdre al., et Serrador migrating 1997; microtubules neutrophils al., where in However, et 2010). localized Ratner al., 2004; are et Takesono al., supported 1997; is lymphocytes et idea using This reports types. (Lee research cell primary other multiple with by contrast sharp in is bu o irtblsrglt etohlmgaini three- known in is environments migration Little tissue 2005). neutrophil (3D) al., regulate dimensional in et microtubules rear Xu how 2002; the about al., towards to et extend (Eddy the contrast arrays neutrophils towards In microtubule the radiate 2005). the behind edge, microtubules al., or leading the et where Xu 1982) nucleate cells 1982; al., microtubules non-leukocyte al., et et that Schliwa (Anderson (Anderson is suggested 1977; nucleus lobes al., others MTOC nuclear et and (Malech between the 1982) nucleus al., that the of et suggested front in studies localized several controversial: Sa 2008; of 2002; Sa Weigelin, rear 1999; the and Pozo, al., del at (Friedl and MTOC (uropod) et the cell and the microtubules often Small are and having leukocytes Wittmann as hand, 2009; 2005; described other al., the On et Keren, 2001). Watanabe Waterman-Storer, 2009; al., and et Vinogradova Mogilner 2011; etohlmigration neutrophil that (La showing versa studies vice or by migration for revealed essential is is what matters context biological oass irtbl yaisadfnto during function and dynamics microtubule assess To h irtbl raiigcne spstoe nfotof front in positioned is center organizing microtubule the , 2 ila .Bement M. William , memn ta. 08 o ta. 2010). al., et Yoo 2008; al., et ¨mmermann ´ nvivo in ce-ardadSrao,20) which 2009), Serrador, and nchez-Madrid 3 aoaoyo ellradMlclrBiology, Molecular and Cellular of Laboratory eue erfs ave which larvae, zebrafish used we , nvitro in a edispensable be can nvivo in 1,3,4 eerhArticle Research nvitro in and vdneta the that Evidence . ´ nchez-Madrid smore is nvitro in nvivo in , Journal of Cell Science ouaino a-eitdporso n oaiyo F-actin of the polarity both and through protrusion motility Rac-mediated neutrophil of 2011; modulation regulates 3- Huttenlocher, phosphoinositol and that (PI(3)K) 2009; shown Yoo have al., kinase 2010; we et Previously al., 2011). and Niethammer et al., et 2006; Yoo responses Yoo al., 2004; 2012; al., et immune al., et Mathias study Trede et 2011; (Deng al., to contexts et tool Deng physiological in emerging migration an leukocyte been have Sale l,20) F-uui eeldarltvl rgtdtin dot bright relatively a revealed GFP-tubulin cells 2002). live GFP-tubulin, in al., microtubules employed et image first (Small to We used been 2006). (Kitaguchi traditionally al., has larvae et which zebrafish Mathias 2009; in al., dynamics promoter et lyz microtubule or mpx visualize neutrophil-specific (Yoo to the this reported using them by expressed previously used and neutrophils bioprobes in as multiple We constructed motility We the 2010). 2010). al., neutrophil et al., as- in study by et to (dpf) motility fertilization system (Yoo post random days mechanisms 2–3 at yet-unidentified apparent head the demonstrated display of mesenchyme and been spontaneously neutrophils not in imaging Such dynamics zebrafish. has living microtubule in tissues intact visualize in rapidly to migrating sought we motility first neutrophil regulate microtubules how determine To Results induces manner. Rho PI(3)K-independent both disassembly a of in activation microtubule the Rac through and part that in least and at radiating motility mainly neutrophil uropod, nucleus, the the of front towards in demonstrate nucleate the We microtubules investigated motility. that 3D we neutrophil Here, during 2010). microtubules al., of role et (Yoo zebrafish in dynamics nvivo in etohl migrate Neutrophils . nvivo in , rb,E3GP B sapu n-idn rti +I)(Hu (+TIP) protein end-binding plus additional a an is tried EB3 we be EB3-GFP. therefore clearly probe, and could that microtubules structures as yielded interpreted rarely the only However, 2). probe Movie EMTB material supplementary putative 1B; linear the (Fig. some from MTOC and nucleus radiating the microtubules) al., of (presumably front et structures in dot Dassow and punctate GFP-tubulin, von a showed than 1999; also signal al., more to yielded well et EMTB-3xGFP (relative as (Faire 2009). cells embryos contrast cultured echinoderm higher live as in the provide imaging to to microtubule GFP-tubulin) fused shown which GFPs previously (EMTB-3xGFP) tandem was domain three fluorescence. microtubule-binding tried background ensconsin next high we be to to Consequently, due likely structures microtubules reveal to individual soluble pass failed GFP-tubulin to to the zebrafish, enough nucleus GFP-tubulin nucleus. small the the of of is out lead and GFP-tubulin, comparison into freely unlike to on which, appeared mCherry, based dot In 1A), below). the also (Fig. see 2002; neutrophils, al., et Eddy migrating strongest 1982; the al., containing et point nucleation (Anderson 1). a signals the as Movie appears because arrays MTOC material microtubule the of supplementary site presumably is 1A; dot (Fig. punctate nucleus This the of front ta. 00 ue l,20) mgn fE3GPrvae that revealed EB3-GFP of Imaging (Stramer 2005). ends al., to plus et used as Xu been well 2010; have as al., CLIP170, arrays et as microtubule whole such Xu at the 2010; +TIPs, filaments label al., Thus, et microtubule 2005). Stramer al., all 2003; et al., labels et but (Stepanova plus expression expression label high specifically low +TIPs at 2003). al., ends et Stepanova 2008; al., et noriaigstiguigrpdymgaignurpisin neutrophils migrating rapidly using setting imaging our In itn 2.Dt r ersnaieo oeta he separate three 10 than bars: more Scale of movies. representative time-lapse mCherry- are probe Data nucleus H2B. a histone and ( EB3-GFP (white). expressing uropod neutrophil edge the leading to the and to (magenta) and extending MTOC microtubules the indicate indicates arrowheads arrow An ( GFP-Tau. (white). expressing uropod neutrophil edge the leading to the and to (magenta) and extending MTOC microtubules the indicate indicates arrowheads arrow An ( EB3-GFP. (white). expressing uropod (magenta) the edge to leading and the structures to linear extending indicate microtubules) Arrowheads (presumably MTOC, arrows. the by presumably indicated dot, is punctate A EMTB-3xGFP. expressing h ulu.Nt htfursetsgaso F-uui are ( GFP-tubulin nucleus. of the signals from fluorescent excluded of that front in Note dot nucleus. punctate the a indicate Arrows mCherry. and GFP-tubulin motility neutrophil during zebrafish. live microtubules in of Localization 1. Fig. irtblsi erfs etohl 5703 neutrophils zebrafish in Microtubules ( A ielpeiaigo etohlexpressing neutrophil a of imaging Time-lapse ) C B ielpeiaigo neutrophil a of imaging Time-lapse ) ielpeiaigo neutrophil a of imaging Time-lapse ) m m. E D ielpeiaigo a of imaging Time-lapse ) ielpeiaigo a of imaging Time-lapse ) Journal of Cell Science n -ci oaiyi h eecya ise fthe of tissues mesenchymal the in motility polarity of random effects F-actin the neutrophil in on on focused and findings we depolymerization Next with 2006). microtubule al., consistent et (Redd 2011). 3A), zebrafish al., (Fig. et wounds directional neutrophils Yoo to 2011; neutrophil Yoo Huttenlocher, impaired attraction when 2009; and depolymerization al., point reverse Yoo et Microtubule by 2010; time Niethammer affected al., 2006; a not al., et et is wounding, (Mathias wounds after migration at to minutes accumulation attraction 30 neutrophil neutrophil at microtubule on of nocodazole wounds effects the by examined induced We disassembly 2011). al., et Yoo 2010; neutrophils of migration vivo attraction, to directional in studying wound for applied To suitable neutrophil is 2005). also which on al., be depolymerization could et microtubule directional Xu knowledge motility 2003; this neutrophil neutrophil (Niggli, whether activation determine impairs Rho motility through neutrophil colchicine enhances but migration or nocodazole Sa Sa 1999; 2008; Weigelin, Pozo, and del (Friedl cell and MTOC the is the of nucleus have rear the leukocytes the 5). of that at front idea prevailing in is the localization Movie from MTOC uropod different the but the material 2005), al., towards et findings supplementary arrays previous microtubule with consistent 1D; the (Fig. in that of towards revealed Localization radiate microtubules uropod and also nucleus the visualize nucleus probe the of front microtubule in to the nucleate This microtubules used of 2005). widely side Kirschner, GFP- and used is the also Drosophila We on which 4). and Movie occasionally localized Tau, S1; but Fig. was also nucleus, material MTOC (supplementary the it The of front 4). transiently, in Movie in localized material H2B mainly nucleate mCherry-histone supplementary probe, microtubules nucleus 1E; a that (Fig. using confirmed nucleus the nucleus we of the front was from above), signals nucleus also fluorescent the backwards of (see of exclusion radiating location to the due arrays 1C; obvious Although (Fig. microtubule dominant. very more but tail that were at edge, noticed the pseudopods leading the also enter of towards the occasionally We front filaments radiate 3). microtubule in faint Movie mainly positioned material and MTOC supplementary nucleus a from the nucleate microtubules 5704 lontscesu,peual u oterpdtroe of turnover rapid migration the to neutrophils. in due of enzymes was proteolytic presumably or conditions Immunostaining microtubules successful, fixation zebrafish. not multiple uropod also the using in towards microtubules radiate motility zebrafish and very neutrophil nucleus turnover the during of microtubules cells the front that in indicate migrating because the nucleate collectively rapidly nonetheless assay possibly they these to rapidly, microtubules, in us individual permitted microtubules of employed of probes dynamics none While microtubule 6). Movie the the material of supplementary front the 2; in localized (Fig. exclude is nucleus MTOC by the to imaging that Live showed and unambiguously probes. overexpression microtubule to findings the due of is our effects MTOC the of confirm localization that further possibility to MTOC, employed we enx sesdhwmcouue euaeneutrophil regulate microtubules how assessed next We Mtise l,20;Nehme ta. 09 o tal., et Yoo 2009; al., et Niethammer 2006; al., et (Mathias ora fCl cec 2 (23) 125 Science Cell of Journal nvivo in nvitro in c uui-F Jsi 93,wihlbl the labels which 1993), (Joshi, tubulin-GFP eou nvivo in Xenopus nvivo in irtbl eoyeiainusing depolymerization Microtubule . ´ X ta. 05 n arpae in macrophages and 2005) al., et (Xu ce-ardadSrao,20) Thus, 2009). Serrador, and nchez-Madrid is eivsiae h fet of effects the investigated we first , nvitro in Bad 95 wnand Kwan 1995; (Brand, Ed ta. 02 Xu 2002; al., et (Eddy nvitro in ´ nchez-Madrid c presumably , tubulin-GFP iasml ciae bcns’sgassc ssal F-actin, stable as such signals neutrophils ‘backness’ of activates nocodazole edge disassembly leading 2005): the al., at vitro F-actin et disturbs (Xu treatment depolymerization microtubule yai -ci ttelaigeg fe microtubule after edge to decreased leading contrast observe in the not is did at This we depolymerization. F-actin that is dynamic difference findings with noticeable neutrophils consistent mainly 2001; for 2003; are Waterman-Storer, findings reported Our and (Niggli, 2005). al., Wittmann et Rho-myosin 2003; depolymerization Xu al., well-established microtubule et the Rodriguez by GFP- to particularly by Nocodazole due activation detected 2010). F-actin presumably al., stable UtrCH, et of localization Yoo 2007; tail al., 2008; et emphasized F-actin) al., (Burkel all F-actin) et for stable for Riedl probe probe (a (a morphology 3E), Microtubule Lifeact-Ruby GFP-UtrCH (Fig. and with dynamics compact 7). detected F-actin was of round, Movie which polarity enhanced material more also inhibition supplementary a 3B–D; induced (Fig. enhanced and nocodazole with motility depolymerization Microtubule head. rsmbytruhRo tteti,btta tmyas maintain also may it that but tail, the at Rho, through presumably than more of representative 10 are bars: Data Scale A. movies. with time-lapse cell separate same three the in nucleus. H2B the histone of front in neutrophil MTOC ( during the nucleus indicate the Arrows of tubulin-GFP. front in zebrafish. live localized in is motility MTOC The 2. Fig. B iutnosiaigo uui-F n ulu rb mCherry- probe nucleus a and tubulin-GFP of imaging Simultaneous ) hsipista,i Dtissues 3D in that, implies This . ( A ielpeiaigo etohlexpressing neutrophil a of imaging Time-lapse ) nvitro in X ta. 05,btone but 2005), al., et (Xu m m. nvivo in nvitro in microtubule , fet of effects in Journal of Cell Science I3Ksgaigb aimti nlss(o ta. 00.In 2010). al., et (Yoo analysis PI(3,4,5)P ratiometric control, by signaling PI(3)K PI(3,4)P tde Ngl,20;X ta. 05.Mroe,tefindings the Moreover, 2005). with al., et agreement Xu in 2003; findings manner, (Niggli, Our studies PI(3)K-independent 9). a motility neutrophil treatment in Movie induces disassembly DMSO neutrophil microtubule material that to increased indicate supplementary compared further polarity 5A,B; but (Fig. the F-actin reversed inhibition and only PI(3)K migration not treatment of 5A,B) PI(3)K Nocodazole (Fig. effects 2010). reported by al., previously et as induced (Yoo polarity neutrophil F-actin we impairs defects and LY294002 motility with polarity hypothesis, inhibition PI(3)K F-actin this rescue inhibition. can and test depolymerization a migration microtubule in To whether inhibited migration investigated is manner. neutrophil signaling mediates PI(3)K-independent that PI(3)K suggesting disassembly motility, that microtubule neutrophil material indicates nocodazole-induced supplementary This 4A,B; during (Fig. 8). edge leading Movie the at signals PI(3,4,5)P (PH products PHAKT-GFP PI(3)K for 2005). bioprobe al., Interestingly, a et AKT), 2010). Xu of al., domain 2003; (Niggli, et signaling Yoo the in 2012; from migration vitro motility al., neutrophil away regulate interstitial depolymerization-mediated et microtubule and migration to (Deng bacteria reverse head to found attraction larvae, attraction, on recently zebrafish wounds, in wound focused examined we contexts including all we in which motility motility, neutrophil signaling, neutrophil neutrophil PI(3)K during regulate microtubules F-actin) (dynamic migration. signals ‘frontness’ rvosyrpre Yoe l,21) u microtubule but 2010), PI(3,4,5)P al., depleted et completely (Yoo depolymerization reported previously oivsiaetemlclrmcaim ywhich by mechanisms molecular the investigate To sidpneto I3Kadi,i at niioyt PI(3)K to inhibitory fact, in is, and PI(3)K of independent is 2 n Cer eeepesdi etohl odetect to neutrophils in expressed were mCherry and , 3 –PI(3,4)P 2 slclzda h edn deas edge leading the at localized is 3 –PI(3,4)P nvitro in 3 in – 2 PI(3,4)P ed ( head. EineMneil,20;Kvrn n tab,2011; al., et Small Straube, 2003; al., et and Rodriguez 2009; Kaverina are Keren, and 2 Mogilner 2004; myosin fibroblasts, including and an (Etienne-Manneville, cells cells, diverse kinase was in Rho tumor disassembly Rho microtubule Rho, activation. by because activated PI(3)K target without obvious motility rescue neutrophil to 2010). al., cells et sufficient (Yoo inhibited activation is Rac PI(3)K localized disruption of microtubule migration that suggest i.4 irtbl iasml niisP() ciaina h leading PI(3,4,5)P the at activation PI(3)K inhibits edge. disassembly Microtubule 4. Fig. etw netgtdhwmcouueihbto promotes inhibition microtubule how investigated we Next ( B A 2 irtbl eoyeiainihbt oaiaino PI(3,4,5)P of localization inhibits depolymerization Microtubule ) ielpertoerciaig(HK-F/Cer)of (PHAKT-GFP/mCherry) imaging ratiometric Time-lapse ) ttelaigeg.Saebr:10 bars: Scale edge. leading the at irtblsi erfs etohl 5705 neutrophils zebrafish in Microtubules 3 –PI(3,4)P 2 yaisdrn etohlrno oiiyi the in motility random neutrophil during dynamics on opooy[(D), morphology round (DMSO), [(C), compact cells makes (Noc)], [(B), motility 3D neutrophil enhances treatment nocodazole with 2 Black. n Sudan with stained wounding. were post Neutrophils minutes 30 at fins wounded polarity. F-actin and motility neutrophil enhances but attraction wound neutrophil impairs depolymerization Microtubule 3. Fig. as oiswr nlzdfrdt nB–D. in data for analyzed were movies time- lapse three and experiments separate three least unpaired t two-tailed and (A) post-test Dunnett * t-Ruby). Tg(mpx:Lifeac with crossed was UtrCH) Tg(mpx:GFP- depolymerization. microtubule after emphasized particularly is GFP-UtrCH by detected F-actin stable of neutrophils. localization Rear in dynamics F-actin of polarity ( analysis. live for used was Tg(mpx:GFP-UtrCH) (Noc)]. cl a:10 bar: Scale ts BD.Dt nAaerpeettv fat of representative are A in Data (B–D). -test 5 Xenopus m 2(MO,2 Nc0.5 (Noc 22 (DMSO), 42 ) ( M). B–D ( E n P A 5 ooaoetetetenhances treatment Nocodazole ) , etohlrcutetto recruitment Neutrophil ) irtbl depolymerization Microtubule ) 8(o) n nue more a induces and (Noc)] 48 .5 n-a NV with ANOVA one-way 0.05, m m oye n leukoctyes and oocytes m. m. nvivo in n 5 2(DMSO), 32 n ncnrs to contrast in , 5 0(DMSO), 40 m M)and22(Noc n n 5 5 38 40 n 5 48 3 – Journal of Cell Science o aafr() cl a:10 analyzed bar: were Scale movies (B). time-lapse for Three data post-test. for Tukey with ANOVA way h sas epnil o etohlmtlt nue by induced motility neutrophil for responsible depolymerization also microtubule is Rho signaling Rho from of this vitro activation motility neutrophil addition, for 2002; release disassembly-induced In al., microtubule et important 2001). mediates Small al., 1998; upon be et al., et Horck to Ren van 2002; activated al., considered et (Krendel are process and are arrays, GEF-H1 not microtubule particularly which is GEFs, pathways p190RhoGEF, Rho Rho Although understood, activates 2001). completely disassembly Waterman-Storer, microtubule and Wittmann Watanabe how 2009; 2005; al., al., et Vinogradova et 2010; al., et Takesono 2002; * LY294002). (nocodazole, 48 control. and with (LY294002) compared 64 motility (DMSO), neutrophil enhances and inhibition. arrest PI(3)K by caused defects ( polarity F-actin reverses nocodazole motility manner. and PI(3)K-independent polarity a neutrophil induces in disassembly Microtubule 5. Fig. 5706 -ci ttelaigeg sitc fe microtubule after intact is edge leading dynamic that the data the at with edge combination F-actin In supplementary leading 10). 6B; the (Fig. Movie protruded material treatment cells nocodazole However, after Rho-inhibited extensively Rho. that through idea found motility the with we cell after consistent regulate is migrate microtubules This not that 6A). did (Fig. inhibition treatment Rho nocodazole and with subtle, was neutrophils mobilized effect this generally slightly but As 2010). neutrophils al., expressing nocodazole T19N et 2010). RhoA using (Yoo motility, 6A,B) disassembly al., neutrophil (Fig. Microtubule morphology inhibits et rounded T19N a (Yoo inducing RhoA the reported, promoter using neutrophils previously in mpx GTP, not but neutrophil-specific GDP to RhoA negative binds dominant which a T19N, expressed we neutrophils, zebrafish in B irtbl iasml eessP() niiinidcdmigration inhibition-induced PI(3)K reverses disassembly Microtubule ) Ngl,20;X ta. 05.Tu,w xmndwhether examined we Thus, 2005). al., et Xu 2003; (Niggli, ora fCl cec 2 (23) 125 Science Cell of Journal m m. nvivo in ( A irtbl eoyeiainwith depolymerization Microtubule ) oseiial nii Rho inhibit specifically To . P , n .5 one- 0.05, 5 66 in ietdmgaint onsbtidcscl oiiyand motility findings cell These Rho motility. that induces neutrophil found nocodazole-induced also but We mediates manner. PI(3)K-independent wounds a in to polarity migration neutrophil impairs disruption directed microtubule that found we findings, rngncepeso fdmnn eaieRc 5Nin D57N motility Rac2 nocodazole-induced addition, inhibited negative neutrophil also 2011) In dominant al., induce et 11). (Deng of not neutrophils Movie expression did material transgenic it supplementary control 7A–C; that (Fig. nocodazole-treated but morphology like compact neutrophils, neutrophils, tail round, Rac2-deficient further a found of actomyosin should We induced knockdown. nocodazole Rac2 nocodazole by 2005), that caused Rho-mediated al., arrest cells motility et the Xu PI(3)K-inhibited release enhancing 2003; with (Niggli, motility contraction through did cell induces it depolymerization only microtubule as tested and If 5B). knockdown, We (Fig. round Rac2 7A–C). induced (Fig. Rac2 more arrest by motility neutrophils reverses 2011), disassembly neutrophils microtubule control whether al., inhibits than making et oligonucleotide compacted al., motility, antisense (Deng et morpholino neutrophil reported (Deng by previously PI(3)K this knockdown in As of test role promoting downstream 2011). Rho motility, polymerization specific well-known To neutrophil hematopoietic regulates F-actin a its which signals. promote Rac2, GTPase, on family to even focused backness we addition possibility, or Rho-mediated in maintain mediating that signals may possibility the frontness disassembly suggested this microtubule 3E), (Fig. depolymerization eew netgtdmcouuednmc n ucinduring function and migration dynamics neutrophil microtubule investigated we Here Discussion motility 3D pathways. Rho-dependent neutrophil suggest and microtubule Rac data induces both 7E, our through Fig. disassembly together, microtubule in Taken primary in 7E). that shown Rho (Fig. al., to As neutrophils et addition in human 1999). Nishita Rac 1999; activated al., directly al., Rho disassembly et et of Ren (Benard forms respectively GTP-bound 2002; active bind the Rac microtubule and a only and GST-RBD in which with neutrophils to assays for GST-PBD, precipitation mammalian neutrophils affinity in directly human performed primary Rho To and purified necessary depolymerization we as manner, Rho. well autonomous microtubule cell as to is Rac whether addition activates This test Rac2 in 12). further Movie motility that material depolymerization-induced supplementary indicates 7D; (Fig. motility nvivo in ersnaieo tlattretm-as movies. 10 time-lapse bars: three Scale are least A at in of Data representative cells. Rho-inhibited in ( protrusion minutes. 30 for tracked was motility neutrophil in and expressed Tg(mpx:Lifeact-Ruby) was T19N Dendra2-Rho motility. neutrophil depolymerization-induced prevents microtubule T19N RhoA negative dominant i.6 h euae irtbl disassembly- motility. neutrophil microtubule mediated regulates Rho 6. Fig. nacrac ihreported with accordance In . m m. B ooaoeinduces Nocodazole ) ( A xrsino a of Expression ) nvitro in Journal of Cell Science n r ersnaieo tlattretm-as ois he ielpemve eeaaye o aafrBadC aai r means are E in Data C. and B for data for analyzed were movies time-lapse Three movies. time-lapse three * least experiments. at separate of representative are D and eetRoGPadRcGP epciey( ( respectively Tg(mpx:mCherry-2A-Rac2D57N). in Rac-GTP, minutes and 30 Rho-GTP for detect tracked was motility Neutrophil motility. ulaefo h TCi rn ftencesi eydifferent very from is reported nucleus been the has of what front from in MTOC the from neutrophils nucleate human is fixed in at which imaged vitro microtubules those to have have uropod, structures neutrophils leukocytes zebrafish similar in the that visualized Microtubules idea uropod. towards the the with radiate consistent arrays microtubule 4(a2M,Nc.( compact. Noc). more MO, cells (rac2 Rac2-inhibited makes 44 treatment nocodazole but compact, neutrophils yokltnadMO eidtencesa h uropod the at Sa nucleus 2008; Sa the is Weigelin, microtubule 1999; behind and and by MTOC (Friedl and neutrophils activated cytoskeleton human is towards motility neutrophil radiate primary Rac nocodazole-induced mainly for necessary in and Second, nucleus depolymerization the uropod. of microtubules the front of in motility roles nucleate unidentified neutrophil we previously during addition, In two migration. neutrophil elucidated for context physiological a findings previous with consistent are ( Tg(mpx:GFP-UtrCH). in round. minutes more 30 cells for Rac2-inhibited tracked was motility. neutrophil motility disassembly-mediated Neutrophil microtubule regulates Rac 7. Fig. ekctsaeotndsrbda aigtemicrotubule the having as described often are Leukocytes Ed ta. 02.Hwvr u idn htmicrotubules that finding our However, 2002). al., et (Eddy ´ ce-ardadSrao,20) efudthat found We 2009). Serrador, and nchez-Madrid D rngncnurpi pcfcepeso fdmnn eaieRc 5Nihbt irtbl eoyeiainidcdneutrophil depolymerization-induced microtubule inhibits D57N Rac2 negative dominant of expression specific neutrophil Transgenic ) P , .5 n-a NV ihBnern otts BC n w-aldpaired two-tailed and (B,C) post-test Bonferroni with ANOVA one-way 0.05, n nvivo in 5 3(oto,DS) 2(oto,Nc,3 rc O MO n 4(a2M,Nc.( Noc). MO, (rac2 44 and DMSO) MO, (rac2 36 Noc), (Control, 52 DMSO), (Control, 53 ´ ce-ardaddlPozo, del and nchez-Madrid nvitro in is,mcouuearrays microtubule First, . nvitro in n 5 ) irtbl iasml ietyatvtsRci diint h npiayhmnnurpis aai A in Data neutrophils. human primary in Rho to addition in Rac activates directly disassembly Microtubule 3). tde.Ti suggests This studies. u ute provide further but , nvivo in . in B a2kokonmksnurpisrud u ooaoetetetmakes treatment nocodazole but round, neutrophils makes knockdown Rac2 ) ( A n nue etohlmtlt naRcdpnetmne.The manner. Rac-dependent a in motility neutrophil using induces and However, positively. vitro Rac and and neutrophils Wittmann zebrafish negatively Rac microtubules 1999; Rho that activate al., concept regulate a to et suggesting 2001), known (Waterman-Storer Waterman-Storer, is fibroblasts polymerization in other the microtubule On 2001). Waterman-Storer, Watanabe 2011; hand, al., and 2009; Wittmann et al., 2005; et Small Straube, al., Vinogradova 2003; et 2010; al., al., et et and Takesono Rodriguez 2002; 2009; Kaverina Keren, and and Mogilner 2004; GEF-H1 including fibroblasts, as systems (Etienne-Manneville, diverse cells, such of in GEFs observed tumor been previously regulation Rho has was through p190RhoGEF, what antagonistic from presumably different Rho, Microtubule-mediated also is Rho thought. to addition in have rear. leukocytes the that at model widespread MTOC the the revise to need we that a2M niismcouuedplmrzto-nue etohlmotility. neutrophil depolymerization-induced microtubule inhibits MO rac2 ) u idnsta irtbl eoyeiainatvtsRac activates depolymerization microtubule that findings Our ehv hw htmcouuedsuto ciae Rac activates disruption microtubule that shown have we , n 5 4(oto,DS) 2(oto,Nc,3 rc O MO and DMSO) MO, (rac2 36 Noc), (Control, 52 DMSO), (Control, 54 irtblsi erfs etohl 5707 neutrophils zebrafish in Microtubules E fiiypeiiainasy ihGTRDadGTPDto GST-PBD and GST-RBD with assays precipitation Affinity ) t ts (E). -test nvivo in Xenopus n rmr ua neutrophils human primary and C oye n leukocytes and oocytes a2kokonmakes knockdown Rac2 ) 6 ...o three of s.e.m. in Journal of Cell Science etohlplrt n oiiytruhngtv euainof regulation negative through suppresses motility cytoskeleton and microtubule polarity the neutrophil that demonstrated tissues intact We in neutrophil migration neutrophil during disassembly-mediated microtubules microtubule migration by could leukocyte motility. which resolved sites, to inflammatory at due be leukocytes of occur retention or might defects diseases inflammatory ihorcretfnig htmcouuedssebyinduces disassembly microtubule together that Taken findings 2011). motility al., current neutrophil et has Huttenlocher, (Woodfin our tissues is mice and injured with in Yoo from observed 2006; inflammation away been migration al., also reverse et neutrophilic Neutrophil wounded (Mathias 2011). from zebrafish al., of away in migration et tissues reverse Lokuta resolution neutrophil 1995; by al., accomplished Further, et diseases (Huttenlocher not microtubule 2005). autoinflammatory defects are with which migration patients symptoms by show from inflammatory mechanisms Neutrophils alleviate the known. drugs However, (Cocco many diseases 2010). depolymerizing that inflammatory al., chronic note treat et to to intriguing drugs age inflammatory is depolymerizing it microtubule migration, feedback leukocyte intricate regulate suggesting microtubules. al., and 2004), Rac et al., Rho, Takesono among regulate et systems 2001; also al., Rac Wittmann and et Rho 2010; both (Palazzo that dynamics Rho noticeable through is microtubules it motility we but study, cell Rac, current regulate and the microtubules In Rac. orchestrating how and for addressed Rho of indispensable upstream is migration microtubule which cell to due that PI(3)K, 2006; signals possibility of attraction al., the to inactivation et blind implies neutrophils Keymeulen This renders (Van 2010). disassembly Rac the al., and through et Rho Yoo motility both the neutrophil of at regulates regulation activation microtubule PI(3)K PI(3)K by edge. inhibits induced leading nocodazole that defects is migration disassembly microtubule- directional in the correlation control interesting with involved One microtubules elusive. how are remains but migration directional Rho motility, of and suppression mediated Rac motility and Both microtubules positively negatively. that migration suggest directional 2005), neutrophil al., regulate et Xu 2003; zebrafish zebrafish (Niggli, studies in in activation GTPase further activation Rho precluding of effects GTPase polarity neutrophils toxic the had of Rho including probes analysis the zebrafish to for but tried in neutrophils we biosensors Moreover, available knockdowns. currently require use specific tissue would not of or role neutrophils are inducible the zebrafish elucidate that further in edge To tools signaling leading level. the cell GTPase at whole at Rho Rac the Rho of at activation of also relative sequestration and to in polarized leading in locally highly tail, 2002; well-known the the occur al., activity to et the might due (Small 2001) Rac neutrophils that activity Waterman-Storer, Rac regulate is and on Wittmann Rho possibility might of effects second GEFs, antagonistic as The Rac such neutrophils. regulation, of similar Rho that microtubules regulation microtubule-mediated is that How possibility speculate to first we types. The mechanisms but possible. yet, cell are clear the mechanisms not two is in neutrophils most in difference Rac are regulate findings to previous due and likely findings our between difference 5708 ee o h is ie ehv iulzdtednmc of dynamics the visualized have we time, first the for Here, eodteisgt forfnig otebscmcaim that mechanisms basic the to findings our of insights the Beyond findings current Our ora fCl cec 2 (23) 125 Science Cell of Journal nvivo in nvivo in tti time. this at nvivo in hssget nitiun aaimthat paradigm intriguing an suggests this , oehrwt previous with together , t r lnclyue santi- as used clinically are nts nvitro in nvivo in . ehnssta rhsrt elmgainwti complex within molecular migration the vertebrate, illuminate cell further transparent orchestrate to tissues able that optically be mechanisms will and we zebrafish, tractable Rac- regulate of genetically migration that have mechanisms neutrophil modulation complex we regulates the dynamics, 3D understand the F-actin PI(3)K to of begun both that polarity now manner. and findings through protrusion PI(3)K-independent mediated previous a motility in our neutrophil activity with Rac Together and Rho both c.Atrcnrfgto,tespraatwsmxdwt 60 with mixed was supernatant the centrifugation, After ice. upne n35 in suspended he aoieso a2M Dn ta. 01 tafnlcnetainof concentration final a at 2011) al., et (Deng MO Rac2 100 of nanoliters Three injection for Morpholino least at pretreated were (0.5–2 larvae containing used, experiments E3 were before in dpf drugs 2.5–3 maintained E3 When minutes experiments, To 20 used. all in were For Sigma-Aldrich). were anesthetized Sigma-Aldrich). larvae larvae (PTU, were 3-aminobenzoate, some N-phenylthiourea larvae mM (ethyl formation, 0.2 assay, Tricaine pigment wounding prevent or mg/ml 0.2 imaging al., et (Yoo containing live previously described For as maintained were 2010). larvae and zebrafish AB procedures Adult general and maintenance Zebrafish Methods and Materials 4 were activation Rac 2 cell of and 15 volume Briefly, Rho equal 2002). of of al., addition et assays by (Nishita stopped precipitation described was previously Affinity as minutes. performed 30 1.5–2.5 for at PBS incubator in suspended were (Yoo neutrophils reported Purified previously 2011). were as al., Neutrophils AS) et consent. Pharma informed (Nycomed with Polymorphprep donors using purified healthy assays from precipitation obtained affinity was and Blood neutrophils human of Purification the acquire to used was 0.4 (NA1.3/60 a a camera using microscope used acquired EMCCD were we inverted images Evolve confocal Z-series 6, Z.1 images. Photometrics Movie scanhead Observer a A confocal material Zeiss with objective). supplementary time-lapse with CSU-X) a and (Yokogawa 6, larvae 2 microscope on Fig. confocal Movie dpf disk in Spinning images material 2–3 0.75/20 For NA 2010). supplementary in a using 1.10/60 and acquired Olympus) NA FV1000, 2 were (FluoView Fig. microscope images of fluorescence data Except analysis and acquisition Image promoter lyz the SV40 a with and ng/ 2006) vector ng/ al., 12.5 17.5 containing backbone et and solution plasmid (Urasaki of the elements nanoliters Three tol2 into sequence. minimal polyadenylation subcloned 2009), al., mCherry- was 2008; et al., IMAGE:40007445), (Kitaguchi 2010) et Tau: al., (Hu 2009), (human al., EB3-GFP EMTB- et et 2009), GFP-Tau Dassow 2010). al., (von 2003), SV40 H2B et al., histone a Dassow al., et and von et 2006) (Yoo 1999; Stepanova al., al., described et et previously (Faire (Urasaki 3xGFP elements as tol2 sequence minimal polyadenylation 2006), al., et (Mathias GFP- injection and construction Plasmid ersn tlattresprt movies. separate three least at represent sn natbd oRo Cl inln,6B)o a Cl inln,no. Signaling, (Cell Rac or 67B9) Signaling, (Cell RhoA to 2465). antibody an using etohl eesandwt ua lc speiul ecie Yoe al., et (Yoo described previously 2011). as Huttenlocher, Black and Sudan Yoo with 2010; stained were Neutrophils onns eemaue sn aaye ucino mgJ omeasure To ImageJ. of function and ‘analyze’ area Neutrophil using 4 MD). Chemotaxis measured Bethesda, roundness, (blue and (NIH, using were tracking) ImageJ 2011 by for (2D roundness Zen analyzed (ibidi) tracking tool and the Manual Migration tracked tracking), using and were (3D made Neutrophils MTrackj Zeiss). were plugins (Carl images software edition) projection intensity Maximum embryos. stage cell Ca(NO mM 0.6 MgSO4, mM 0.4 KCl, mM 0.7 a netda control. a as injected was 1 6 ˚ o .Teba elt eewse he ie ih1 with times three washed were pellets bead The h. 1 for C 10 m m S-B on oguahoeSpaoe(yokltn n nuae at incubated and (Cytoskeleton) glutathione-Sepharose to bound GST-PBD g a 7 a netdit -elsaeebys aia ufr[8m NaCl, mM [58 buffer Danieau embryos. 1-cell-stage into injected was M uui a ucoe notebcbn etrwt h p promoter mpx the with vector backbone the into subcloned was tubulin el eeperae ihDS r10 or DMSO with pretreated were Cells nvivo in 6 6 ae meso betv esa rvosydsrbd(o tal., et (Yoo described previously as lens objective immersion water area/ m . fLemisml ufr n nlzdb immunoblotting by analyzed and buffer, sample Laemmli of l p 6 m rnpss RAwsijce notectpamo one- of cytoplasm the into injected was mRNA transposase l major_axis 2 nvivo in a acltd aao ielpeimages time-lapse of Data calculated. was c uui-F rDnr2RoT9 (Yoo T19N Dendra2-Rho or tubulin-GFP m nobel,b sn the using by Undoubtedly, . ooaoe 65 nocodazole, M 6 m 3 yi/iaebfe o 0mnon min 20 for buffer lysis/kinase ooaoei 37 a in nocodazole M ) 2 m . MHPSp 7.1–7.3] pH HEPES mM 5.0 , tpsz n 0 Mgain. EM 300 and size step M 6 6 yi/iaebuffer, lysis/kinase m ae immersion water m 6 S-B or GST-RBD g LY294002). M 6 betv ra or objective 10 ˚ /%CO C/5% 7 cells/ml. m DNA l 2 Journal of Cell Science iauh,T,Kwkm,K n aaaa A. Kawahara, and K. Kawakami, T., Kitaguchi, aeia .adSrue A. Straube, and I. Kaverina, oh,H C. H. H. Joshi, Emery, and J. I. Frieden, W. A., E. Huttenlocher, Dent, and E. Merriam, S., Nam, C., Viesselmann, X., Hu, B. Weigelin, and P. Friedl, ar,K,Wtra-trr .M,Gue,D,Mso,D,Slo,E .and D. E. Salmon, D., Masson, D., Gruber, M., C. Waterman-Storer, K., Faire, ueee,U n clw,M. Schliwa, and U. Euteneuer, ten-anvle S. Etienne-Manneville, A. Brand, dy .J,Peii .M n afed .R. F. Maxfield, and M. L. Pierini, J., R. Eddy, S. Pandolfi, and C. D. M. Chu, G., W. Cocco, Bement, and G. Dassow, von M., B. Burkel, M. G. Bokoch, and P. B. Bohl, V., Benard, etakK .Wlesfrcntuto ftol2-mpx-GFP-tubulin of construction for Walters B. K. with thank We ANOVA One-way Acknowledgements 5B. Fig. post-test: 7B,C. Tukey Fig. post-test: with Bonferroni were ANOVA values unpaired P One-way Two-tailed values, analyses. paired of following tailed population the overall by of derived distribution Gaussian Assuming Statistics eg . ave .A n utnohr A. Huttenlocher, and A. E. Harvie, Q., A. Deng, Huttenlocher, and M. J. Green, J., P. Cavnar, K., S. Yoo, Q., Deng, R. B. Brinkley, and W. C. Smith, J., B. Hughes, J., L. Wible, C., D. Anderson, References W.M.B., to at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.108324/-/DC1 online available GM052932 months. material Association 12 Supplementary after National numbers release Heart for the PMC [grant American in and Deposited A.H.]. Health a S.Y.]; to GM074827 of to by 11PRE4890041 supported Institutes [number was fellowship work critical This EB3-GFP and of discussion Funding gift insightful generous for manuscript. for Starnes the Galjart W. of reading T. N. tol2-lyz-Dendra2-RhoT19N and and of plasmid Dent construction E. for plasmid, Deng Q. plasmid, rne,M,Zne .T n ooh .M. G. Bokoch, and T. F. Zenke, M., Krendel, wn .M n ishe,M W. M. Kirschner, and M. K. Kwan, La memn,T,Bdr .L,Mnly .J,Wrs . Wedlich-So T., Worbs, J., S. Monkley, L., B. Bader, T., ¨mmermann, yli-ieg pcfcgn yoyeCdrn erfs myelopoiesis. zebrafish during C lysozyme gene Dev. specific myeloid-lineage a microtubules. Bioessays 13105. nlmaoydisease. inflammatory spines. dendritic of invasion microtubule dynamic dependent dynamics. function. microtubule of modulator physiological a Sci. not Cell is J. and vivo in C. microtubules J. Bulinski, yolsi rget nteasneo microtubules. of absence the in fragments cytoplasmic control? etohlplrzto n migration. and polarization neutrophil for assay novel a using neutrophils GTPases. active human chemoattractant-stimulated in activation eit etohlatato obceilifcinadtsu injury. tissue and infection bacterial 14 to attraction neutrophil mediate internists. for utrophin. of domain actin-binding the on based Cytoskeleton filaments actin for probes of effects leukocytes: polymorphonuclear colchicine. in and stimulation microtubules chemotactic Cytoplasmic (1982). oe o a2i etohlmtlt n ciertnini erfs hematopoietic zebrafish in retention active and motility neutrophil tissue. in Rac2 for roles E-1mdae rs-akbtenmcouue n h ci cytoskeleton. actin the and microtubules Biol. Cell between cross-talk mediates GEF-H1 ai ekct irto yitgi-needn lwn n squeezing. and flowing integrin-independent by 453 migration Fo leukocyte M., Rapid Keller, K., Hirsch, laevis. Xenopus of extension 4599-4610. convergent during morphology cell 517-528. , 51-55. , 126 e.Cell Dev. 19) F nDrosophila. in GFP (1995). Traffic 314-323. , a.Immunol. Nat. 4 15 294-301. , t 112 19) am-uui:tehbo ellrmcouueassemblies. microtubule cellular of hub the Gamma-tubulin: (1993). ts:Fg E n-a NV ihDnetps-et i.3A. Fig. post-test: Dunnett with ANOVA One-way 7E. Fig. -test: 637-643. , 64 u.J nen Med. Intern. J. Eur. ei.Cl e.Biol. Dev. Cell Semin. 4243-4255. , 822-832. , 5 .Bo.Chem. Biol. J. 21 470-477. , 19) -A-1 esosn soitsdnmclywith dynamically associates (ensconsin) E-MAP-115 (1999). 735-745. , 20) ci n irtblsi elmtlt:wihoei in is one which motility: cell in microtubules and Actin (2004). .Rheumatol. J. 9 960-969. , rtr . rthe,D . Fa R., D. Critchley, R., ¨rster, 20) nesiilluoyemgainadimmune and migration leukocyte Interstitial (2008). 21) euaino elmgainb dynamic by migration cell of Regulation (2011). 274 18) esset ietoa oiiyo el and cells of motility directional Persistent, (1984). 21 20) irtbl-idn h-E controls Rho-GEF microtubule-binding A (2005). 13198-13204. , rnsGenet. Trends 21) ociiei lnclmdcn.Aguide A medicine. clinical in Colchicine (2010). 22 503-508. , 22 o.Bo.Cell Biol. Mol. 1171-1173. , 968-974. , Cell 19) hrceiaino a n cdc42 and rac of Characterization (1999). 31 20) irtbl smer during asymmetry Microtubule (2002). 21) itntsgaigmechanisms signaling Distinct (2012). 719-729. , 20) rncitoa euainof regulation Transcriptional (2009). 19) entlostmultisystem onset Neonatal (1995). 20) uloieecag factor exchange Nucleotide (2002). 11 324-325. , 13 20) estl fluorescent Versatile (2007). Nature 4470-4483. , t ts:Fg BD Two- 3B–D. Fig. -test: slr .e al. et R. ¨ssler, .Neurosci. J. 310 Development 58-61. , 20) Activity- (2008). el Microbiol. Cell. 21) Dual (2011). lnr R., ¨ldner, elMotil. Cell 28 13094- , (2008). Nature Mech. 132 Nat. , a oc,F . hain .R,Haeusl R., M. Ahmadian, P., F. Horck, van K. Kawakami, and G. Morvan, A., Urasaki, rd,N . agnu .M,Tae,D,Lo,A .adZn .I. L. Zon, and T. A. Look, D., Traver, M., D. Langenau, S., N. Trede, aeoo . esa,S . oca-ttad . ag .adRde,A J. A. Ridley, and R. Garg, B., Wojciak-Stothard, J., S. Heasman, A., Takesono, tae,B,Mria . ilr,T,Eas . un,C . ae,O,Mle,M., Milner, O., Sabet, Y., C. Huang, I., Evans, T., Millard, S., Moreira, B., Stramer, tpnv,T,Semr . ognad .C,Lnbre,G,Drln,B,De B., Dortland, G., Lansbergen, C., C. Hoogenraad, J., Slemmer, T., Stepanova, e,Y,L,R,Zeg .adBsh H. Busch, and Y. Zheng, R., Li, Y., Ren, ml,J . egr . aeia .adBrhdk,A. Bershadsky, and I. Kaverina, B., Geiger, V., J. Small, ed .J,Kly . un . a,M n atn P. Martin, and M. Way, G., Dunn, G., Kelly, J., M. D. Redd, Lichlyter, G. and G. S. Gundersen, W. Sherrod, and S., S. Ratner, A. Alberts, A., T. Cook, F., A. Palazzo, K. Mizuno, and H. Aizawa, M., Nishita, igit .E n o,C Q. C. Doe, and E. S. Siegrist, U. Euteneuer, and B. K. Pryzwansky, M., Schliwa, Sa Sa aiiv .M,Glad .M,Dmia .V,Iaoa .Y,Km,S .and G. S. Komm, Y., O. Ivanova, V., L. Domnina, M., I. Gelfand, M., J. Vasiliev, igi V. Niggli, J. T. Mitchison, and T. A. Look, C., Grabher, P., Niethammer, K. Keren, and A. Mogilner, erdr .M,Aos-err,J . e oo .A,Frhar . Schwartz- H., Furthmayr, A., M. Pozo, del L., J. Alonso-Lebrero, M., J. Serrador, M. W. Bement, P., Forscher, A., C. Mandato, W., A. M., Schaefer, Bista, C., D., O. Neukirchen, Rodriguez, H., J. Yu, K., Kessenbrock, H., A. Crevenna, J., Riedl, aha,J . ern .J,Lu .X,Kni . ok .T n utnohr A. Huttenlocher, and T. A. Look, J., Kanki, X., T. Liu, J., B. Perrin, R., J. Mathias, e,X . ise,W .adShat,M A. M. Schwartz, and B. W. Kiosses, D., X. Ren, a emue,A,Wn,K,Kih,Z . oars . an .M,Soa,K. Shokat, M., K. Hahn, C., Govaerts, A., Z. Knight, K., Wong, A., Keymeulen, Van aeh .L,Ro,R .adGli,J I. J. Gallin, and K. R. Root, L., H. Malech, oua .A,Coe,K . ketjvc,I,Ksnr .L n Huttenlocher, and L. D. Kastner, I., Aksentijevich, M., K. Cooper, A., M. Lokuta, A. Shimizu, and M. Sugai, H., Gonda, T., Hara, T., Katakai, H., J. Lee, nhzMdi,F n erdr .M. J. Serrador, A. and F. M. ´nchez-Madrid, Pozo, del and F. ´nchez-Madrid, rnpsbeeeetietfe h iia i-euneadahgl repetitive highly a O. and transposition. for cis-sequence essential region minimal subterminal the the in sequence identified element transposable immunity. understand to zebrafish of 21) irtblsrglt irtr oaiytruhRoRC inln nT in signaling Rho/ROCK through polarity cells. migratory regulate Microtubules (2010). euae essetmtlt n otc euso nDoohl arpae nvivo. in macrophages Biol. Drosophila in Cell repulsion J. contact W. and motility Wood, persistent and regulates P. Martin, G., Dunn, 20) iulzto fmcouuegot nclue ern i h s fEB3- of N. use Galjart, the protein). and via fluorescent A. neurons 3-green cultured Akhmanova, protein in G., (end-binding growth GFP Cappellen, microtubule van of F., Visualization (2003). Grosveld, I., C. Zeeuw, irtblsgiemgaigcells? migrating guide microtubules arpaeceoai nvv:suiso irtbl ucini erfs wound zebrafish in function microtubule of studies inflammation. vivo: in chemotaxis macrophage microtubules. stable of orientation and Biol. formation Rho-regulated mediates 1 irtbl-soitdgaiencetd xhnefco o a n Rho and Rac for factor exchange nucleotide guanine microtubule-associated a H1, Dev. fibroblasts. V. L. Olshevskaja, rpdadisrl nTcl oaiainadmotility. and polarization cell T in role its and uropod chemotaxis. T-cell for phosphorylation cofilin induces signalling Biol. and Cell. of 1 Mol. kinase sets LIM differential activates for implications neutrophils: human pathways. of migration R771. oteuoo fTlmhctsdrn elpolarization. redistributed cell is during and lymphocytes molecule-3 T of adhesion uropod intercellular the of to region Sa cytoplasmic and the F. Lozano, with J., Calvo, R., Albiez, motility. and activation cell to related 705-717. phenomenon unusual an neutrophils: uropod. the of roles interactions. immune and migration morphogenesis. and movement M. cell C. al. Waterman-Storer, et and Z. Werb, A., F-actin. T. visualize Holak, to D., marker Jenne, F., Bradke, rdeto yrgnprxd eitsrpdwuddtcini zebrafish. in detection wound rapid mediates 459 peroxide hydrogen of gradient in neutrophils of chemotaxis retrograde by inflammation zebrafish. of transgenic Resolution (2006). idn rti h ycl deinadtecytoskeleton. the and adhesion cell by Rho protein binding hAatvt ttebc swl ssgasa h front. the at signals as well as back the at activity RhoA R. H. Bourne, and M. microtubules. with interacts that factor exchange etohlmgain etil,mcouue n irflmn retto and orientation microfilament and microtubule, chemotaxis. during Centriole, function migration. neutrophil GTPases. nlmaoydsaeadMcl-el syndrome. Muckle-Wells 95 and disease inflammatory A. fpEMadRoRC inln nlmhct oaiyaduoo formation. uropod and polarity lymphocyte in Biol. signaling Cell J. Rho-ROCK and p-ERM of 394-399. , 996-999. , 20) etohlceoai naptetwt entlostmultisystem neonatal-onset with patient a in chemotaxis Neutrophil (2005). 20) hrceiaino Characterization (2001). 21 3 LSONE PLoS 723-729. , 483-496. , irtblsi erfs etohl 5709 neutrophils zebrafish in Microtubules 20) irtbl-irpinidcdadchemotactic-peptide-induced and Microtubule-disruption-induced (2003). .Bo.Chem. Biol. J. .Cl Sci. Cell J. .Ebyl x.Morphol. Exp. Embryol. J. 189 167 elMtl Cytoskeleton Motil. Cell 22 681-689. , 327-337. , 5 774-783. , e8774. , a.Rv o.Cl Biol. Cell Mol. Rev. Nat. .Luo.Biol. Leukoc. J. 17) feto ocmdo h ooooybhvorof behaviour locomotory the on colcemid of Effect (1970). 20) osaiienurpi oaiy I3adCc2augment Cdc42 and PIP3 polarity, neutrophil stabilize To (2006). 116 273 813-822. , 20) h hp fmtl cells. motile of shape The (2009). 20) irtbl-nue otclcl polarity. cell cortical Microtubule-induced (2007). a.Methods Nat. .Cl Biol. Cell J. 34954-34960. , 10hGF hAseii unn nucleotide guanine RhoA-specific a p190RhoGEF, f 20) osre irtbl-ci neatosin interactions microtubule-actin Conserved (2003). a.Cl Biol. Cell Nat. MOJ. EMBO a.Rv o.Cl Biol. Cell Mol. Rev. Nat. 80 Immunity 21) ls-eitdmcouuebundling microtubule Clasp-mediated (2010). 24 r .C,Moear .H n Kranenburg, and H. W. Moolenaar, C., L. er, 19) lnn n hrceiaino GEF- of characterization and Cloning (1998). 63 nhzMdi,F. ´nchez-Madrid, 1281-1288. , 20) toa eldrvdfco 1alpha factor cell-derived Stromal (2002). 75 20) rnigu h er eiigthe defining rear: the up Bringing (2009). 625-640. , 415-422. , 5 605-607. , 20) ucinldseto fteTol2 the of dissection Functional (2006). 666-693. , 19) ekct oaiaini cell in polarization Leukocyte (1999). 19) irtbl ercinit the into retraction Microtubule (1997). 10 .Bo.Chem. Biol. J. 18 17) tutrlaayi fhuman of analysis Structural (1977). 19) euaino h ml GTP- small the of Regulation (1999). 20 353-359. , 501-511. , 367-379. , 5 18) etooesltigin splitting Centrosome (1982). 599-609. , n.AlryAtm Immunol. Asthma Allergy Ann. .Immunol. J. .Cl Biol. Cell J. .Neurosci. J. .Cl Biol. Cell J. 20) iec:aversatile a Lifeact: (2008). MOJ. EMBO 19) osninteracts Moesin (1997). 276 Genetics 3 ur Biol. Curr. 20) tissue-scale A (2009). 957-964. , 4948-4956. , 20) o do How (2002). 20) Imaging (2006). 174 159 138 23 20) h use The (2004). 18 20) mDia (2001). 174 2655-2664. , 20) Roles (2004). 437-445. , 1063-1067. , 1409-1423. , 578-585. , 639-649. , 19 a.Cell Nat. Cell R762- , Nature Genes 31 , Journal of Cell Science itan . ooh .M n aemnSoe,C M. C. Waterman-Storer, and M. G. Bokoch, T., Wittmann, M. C. Waterman-Storer, and T. Wittmann, aemnSoe,C . otyae .A,Lu .P,Brig,K n Salmon, and K. Burridge, P., B. Liu, A., R. Worthylake, M., C. Waterman-Storer, K. Kaibuchi, and J. Noritake, T., Watanabe, o asw . ebuge .J,Mle,A . ie,J .adBmn,W M. W. Bement, and R. J. Sider, L., A. Miller, J., K. Verbrugghe, G., Dassow, von iordv,T,Mle,P .adKvrn,I. Kaverina, and M. P. Miller, T., Vinogradova, 5710 irtbl etblzn ciiyo p8sahi ontemo Rac1. of downstream Op18/stathmin of Chem. activity destabilizing microtubule way? the point microtubules and nfibroblasts. in D. E. migration. cell 20) cina itnedrn cytokinesis. during distance a at Action (2009). smer nmtl el:rl fGlidrvdarray. Golgi-derived of role cells: motile in asymmetry 19) irtbl rwhatvtsRc opooelmlioilprotrusion lamellipodial promote to Rac1 activates growth Microtubule (1999). 279 ora fCl cec 2 (23) 125 Science Cell of Journal 6196-6203. , a.Cl Biol. Cell Nat. rnsCl Biol. Cell Trends 1 45-50. , 15 .Cl Sci. Cell J. 76-83. , 20) elmtlt:cnRoGTPases Rho can motility: Cell (2001). 114 20) euaino irtblsin microtubules of Regulation (2005). .Cl Biol. Cell J. 3795-3803. , 20) irtbl network Microtubule (2009). elCycle Cell 187 20) euainof Regulation (2004). 831-845. , 8 2168-2174. , .Biol. J. o,S . tre,T . eg .adHtelce,A. Huttenlocher, and Q. Deng, W., T. Starnes, K., S. Yoo, o,S . eg . anr .J,W,Y . an .M n utnohr A. Huttenlocher, and M. K. Hahn, I., Y. Wu, J., P. Cavnar, Q., Deng, K., S. Yoo, u . ag . a emue,A,Rne,M n ore .R. H. Bourne, A. Huttenlocher, and and M. K. S. Rentel, Yoo, A., Keymeulen, Van F., Wang, J., Xu, Nash, M., F. Diapouli, D., Caille, B., Colom, M., Beyrau, B., M. Voisin, A., Woodfin, esrta eitsluoyewudatato nvivo. in attraction wound leukocyte mediates that sensor 21) ifrnilrglto fporso n oaiyb IKdrn neutrophil during PI3K by zebrafish. polarity live and in protrusion motility of regulation Differential (2010). rfikn uigifamto nlv zebrafish. live in inflammation during trafficking al. et E. r vivo. G. in Rainger, JAM-C neutrophils M., S. molecule Albelda, adhesion T., Chavakis, B., G. etohlmcouue upesplrt n nac ietoa migration. directional USA enhance Sci. and Acad. polarity Natl. suppress microtubules Neutrophil a.Immunol. Nat. 102 6884-6889. , e.Cell Dev. gltsplrzdtranse polarized egulates 21) ptoeprlpooaeigo neutrophil of photolabeling Spatiotemporal (2011). 12 18 761-769. , 226-236. , .Luo.Biol. Leukoc. J. Nature dteilmgainof migration ndothelial 21) y saredox a is Lyn (2011). 21) h junctional The (2011). 480 89 109-112. , 661-667. , (2005). Proc.