The 20Th Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 20Th Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright Committee at its 40th Session (Istanbul, 2016); the Committee adopted Decision 40 COM 8B.30, which reads th The 20 Century Architecture as follows: of Frank Lloyd Wright The World Heritage Committee, (United States of America) No 1496rev 1. Having examined Documents WHC/16/ 40.COM/8B, and WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Refers the examination of the nomination of Key Works of Modern Architecture by Frank Lloyd Wright, United States of America, on the World Heritage List, in order to Official name as proposed by the State Party allow the State Party, with the advice of ICOMOS and the The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright World Heritage Centre if requested to Location a) redefine the rationale for a series of components Oak Park, Illinois (not necessarily the ones currently nominated) that might have the potential to justify Outstanding Chicago, Illinois Universal Value through conveying the way one or Spring Green, Winsconsin more exceptional facets of the oeuvre of Frank Los Angeles, California Lloyd Wright influenced the architecture of the Mill Run, Pennsylvania 20th century, Madison, Winsconsin Scottsdale, Arizona b) define more structured management for individual New York, New York components coordinated by the Frank Lloyd United States of America Wright World Heritage Council, c) examine and pursue opportunities to revise the Brief description nominated property boundaries, expand buffer th The property “The 20 -Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd zones and enhance protection in and beyond the Wright” focusses upon the influence that the work of the buffer zones for component sites in relation to the American architect, Frank Lloyd Wright (1867-1959), had, attributes of potential Outstanding Universal not only in his own countrybut, on the architecture of the Value; 20th century and the recognized masters of the Modern 3. Encourages the State Party to consider inviting ICOMOS Movement in architecture in Europe. The qualities of what to offer advice on the above recommendations in the is known as ‘organic architecture’ developed by Wright, framework of the Upstream Process. including the open plan, the blurring between exterior and interior, the new uses of materials and technologies and the At the request of the State Party, an ICOMOS Advisory explicit responses to the suburban and natural settings of Process was carried out in two phases: a first one from the various buildings, have been acknowledged as pivotal August 2016 to February 2017 and a second one which in the development of modern architectural design in the ended in April 2018. The outcomes of this process and th 20 century. ICOMOS recommendations have been taken into account by the State Party and incorporated in the revised version The property includes a series of 8 buildings designed and of the nomination dossier. th built over the first half of the 20 century; each component has specific characteristics, representing new solutions to Consultations and Technical Evaluation Mission the needs for housing, worship, work, education and Desk reviews have been provided by ICOMOS leisure. The diversity of functions, scale and setting of the International Scientific Committees, members and components of the series fully illustrate the architectural independent experts. principles of ‘organic architecture’. During the assessment of the original nomination dossier, Category of property two ICOMOS technical evaluation missions visited In terms of categories of cultural property set out in Article I different parts of the property: the first from 1 to of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, this is a serial 13 September 2015 and the second from 11 to nomination of 8 monuments. 23 September 2015. After the World Heritage Committee decision in 2016, no further ICOMOS technical evaluation mission visited the nominated property. 1 Basic data Additional information received by ICOMOS Included in the Tentative List After the reception of the revised nomination dossier, no 30 January 2008, as “Frank Lloyd Wright Buildings” further information was requested to the State Party. Background Date of ICOMOS approval of this report The nomination “Key Works of Modern Architecture by 13 March 2019 Frank Lloyd Wright” was examined by the World Heritage 23 2 Description of the property seen to symbolise the expansive qualities of the Illinois and the Midwest prairie landscapes. Note: The revised nomination dossier contains detailed descriptions of this property, its history and its state of Taliesin, Spring Green, Wisconsin, begun 1911, conservation. Due to limitations on the length of evaluation constructed 1911-1959. reports, this report only provides a short summary of the most Taliesin was constructed by Wright as his home and relevant aspects. studio in a hilly rural area of Wisconsin. It was begun in 1911 and became his summer studio after Taliesin West Description and History was built in 1938. Various buildings underwent re-building The work of Frank Lloyd Wright exercised a remarkable work after two major fires as well as expansion over a influence not only in his own country, the United States of period of some fifty years. The estate also includes America, but also far beyond, including some of the Hillside Home School, the drafting studio, galleries, masters of the European Modern Movement in theatre, and Midway Barn, Tan-y-deri, the residence for architecture. The revised nomination dossier includes a his sister and the related windmill. The buildings, with low series of 8 buildings projected over the first half of the 20th pitched roofs, stone clad walls, and overhanging century, selected out of some 400 buildings still surviving. balconies cascade irregularly down the hill from a tower- They are: like belvedere. They have views across a lake to more hills beyond or to an enclosed hill garden designed by Unity Temple, Oak Park, Illinois, designed 1905, Wright. constructed 1906-1909; Frederick C. Robie House, Chicago, Illinois, Hollyhock House, Los Angeles, California, designed designed 1908, constructed 1910; 1918, constructed 1918-1921. Taliesin, Spring Green, Wisconsin, begun 1911, Hollyhock House was built around a pillared courtyard constructed 1911-1959; and is ornamented with hollyhock motifs in cast concrete Hollyhock House, Los Angeles, California, and stained glass. The house was built as a nucleus for a designed 1918, constructed 1918-1921; cultural centre at the moment when Hollywood was taking Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania, designed off as a movie centre. The form of the house reflects 1935, constructed 1936-1939; Spanish patio house traditions and has references to Herbert and Katherine Jacobs House, Madison, ancient Mayan forms. The large courtyard was designed Wisconsin, designed 1936, constructed 1936- for theatrical performances and the surrounding roof 1937; terraces linked by stairways and bridges provided viewing Taliesin West, Scottsdale, Arizona, begun 1938; platforms for drama and dance. Wright designed furniture Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, for the open plan living and dining rooms, most of which New York, designed 1943, constructed 1956- remains in the house. Many of its architectural features 1959. seem to herald later works in Los Angeles such as the so- called ‘textile-block’. Unity Temple, Oak Park, Illinois, designed 1905,constructed 1906-1909. Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania, designed 1935, Unity Temple was constructed in the Chicago suburb of constructed 1936-1939. Oak Park, where Wright lived and worked between 1887 Fallingwater is sited on top of a small waterfall in the and 1909. It sits on a corner plot of the urban grid pattern, southern Laurel Highlands. Built as a weekend retreat for facing one of the main roads. Built entirely out of Edgar and Liliane Kaufmann, the three storey house sits monolithic reinforced concrete, the building consists of on reinforced concrete slabs, apparently cantilevered two rectangular blocks, one for the church and the second from a central chimney, and covered with random stone for teaching and office spaces, linked by an entrance paving. The slabs provide the interior floors and extensive foyer. The main space was designed to accommodate open terraces overlooking the small gorge. The vertical four hundred worshippers in multiple levels of seating walls are of locally quarried stone. Extensive plate glass under a coffered ceiling lit by twenty-five art glass windows of the large main living room and smaller studies skylights. Wright designed the interior and exterior and bedrooms provide thin barriers between the inside finishes, as well as lighting fixtures and furniture, all of and outside. which are still in place. Herbert and Katherine Jacobs House, Madison, Frederick C. Robie House, Chicago, Illinois, designed Wisconsin, designed 1936, constructed 1936-1937. 1908, constructed 1910. This small house was the first of Wright’s so-called This horizontal house with low pitched roof, massive Usonian houses, of which over 300 were built. They central chimney, long rows of low windows and aimed to be modest single storey American suburban continuous roofed balconies that over sail the ground floor dwellings, with open plan living room and dining/kitchen. rooms, is the largest of a group of similarly formed houses Often L-shaped and usually with a small garden, they in Oak Park, which are identified with the Prairie School were constructed from standardised building of Architecture that Wright and others developed in the components. The houses were specifically
Recommended publications
  • Phoenix Area Homes Include the Circular David Wright House (1952), 5212 East Exeter Blvd., Designed for His Son in North Phoenix (1950), and the H.C
    CITY REPORT (Iraq) Opera House (never built), serves as a distinguished gateway to the Tempe campus of Arizona State University. Its president at the time, Grady Gammage, was a good friend of the architect. Wright’s First Christian Church (designed in 1948/built posthumously by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation in 1973), 6750 N. Seventh Ave., incorporates desert masonry, as in Taliesin West, and features distinctive spires. Wright’s ten distinguished Phoenix area homes include the circular David Wright House (1952), 5212 East Exeter Blvd., designed for his son in north Phoenix (1950), and the H.C. Price House (1954), 7211 N. Tatum Blvd., with its graceful combination of concrete block, steel and copper in a foothills setting. Wright’s approach continued through his pupils, such as Albert Chase McArthur, who is generally credited with the design of the spectacular Arizona Biltmore Hotel (1928), 24th St. and Missouri Ave. Wright’s influence on the building is clear in both massing and details, including the distinctive concrete Biltmore Blocks, cast onsite to an Emry Kopta design. The hotel was Foundation. Photo by Lara Corcoran, courtesy Frank Lloyd Wright restored after a fire in 1973, and additions were built in 1975 and 1979. Blaine Drake was another student who, with Alden Dow, designed the original Phoenix Art Museum, Theater and Library Complex and East Wing (1959, 1965), 1625 N. Central Ave. (Tod Williams and Billie Tsien Architects, New York, designed additions in 1996 and 2006.) Drake also designed the first addition to the Heard Museum (1929), 22 E. Monte Vista Rd., a PHOENIX: UP FROM THE DESERT Spanish Colonial Revival by H.H.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Frank Lloyd Wright Establish a New Canon of American
    “ The mother art is architecture. Without an architecture of our own we have no soul of our own civilization.” -Frank Lloyd Wright How did Frank Lloyd Wright establish a new canon of American architecture? Frank Lloyd Wright (1867-1959) •Considered an architectural/artistic genius and THE best architect of last 125 years •Designed over 800 buildings •Known for ‘Prairie Style’ (really a movement!) architecture that influenced an entire group of architects •Believed in “architecture of democracy” •Created an “organic form of architecture” Prairie School The term "Prairie School" was coined by H. Allen Brooks, one of the first architectural historians to write extensively about these architects and their work. The Prairie school shared an embrace of handcrafting and craftsmanship as a reaction against the new assembly line, mass production manufacturing techniques, which they felt created inferior products and dehumanized workers. However, Wright believed that the use of the machine would help to create innovative architecture for all. From your architectural samples, what may we deduce about the elements of Wright’s work? Prairie School • Use of horizontal lines (thought to evoke native prairie landscape) • Based on geometric forms . Flat or hipped roofs with broad overhanging eaves . “Environmentally” set: elevations, overhangs oriented for ventilation . Windows grouped in horizontal bands called ribbon fenestration that used shifting light . Window to wall ratio affected exterior & interior . Overhangs & bays reach out to embrace . Integration with the landscape…Wright designed inside going out . Solid construction & indigenous materials (brick, wood, terracotta, stucco…natural materials) . Open continuous plan & spaces; use of dissolving walls, but connected spaces Prairie School •Designed & used “glass screens” that echoed natural forms •Created Usonian homes for the “masses” Frank Lloyd Wright, Darwin D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Visualisation
    THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES Tamarah Alqalami Ph.D. Thesis 2017 THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES School of the Built Environment University of Salford, Salford, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... X DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................................... XI ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................. XII ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final
    VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final Survey Report August 9, 2013 Village of River Forest Historic Preservation Commission CONTENTS INTRODUCTION P. 6 Survey Mission p. 6 Historic Preservation in River Forest p. 8 Survey Process p. 10 Evaluation Methodology p. 13 RIVER FOREST ARCHITECTURE P. 18 Architectural Styles p. 19 Vernacular Building Forms p. 34 HISTORIC CONTEXT P. 40 Nineteenth Century Residential Development p. 40 Twentieth Century Development: 1900 to 1940 p. 44 Twentieth Century Development: 1940 to 2000 p. 51 River Forest Commercial Development p. 52 Religious and Educational Buildings p. 57 Public Schools and Library p. 60 Campuses of Higher Education p. 61 Recreational Buildings and Parks p. 62 Significant Architects and Builders p. 64 Other Architects and Builders of Note p. 72 Buildings by Significant Architect and Builders p. 73 SURVEY FINDINGS P. 78 Significant Properties p. 79 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Noteworthy Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 82 Districts p. 82 Recommendations p. 83 INVENTORY P. 94 Significant Properties p. 94 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 97 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 103 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 104 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 121 Notable Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY P. 128 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RIVER FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION David Franek, Chair Laurel McMahon Paul Harding, FAIA Cindy Mastbrook Judy Deogracias David Raino-Ogden Tom Zurowski, AIA PROJECT COMMITTEE Laurel McMahon Tom Zurowski, AIA Michael Braiman, Assistant Village Administrator SURVEY TEAM Nicholas P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocal Sites Membership Program
    2015–2016 Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Membership Program The Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Program includes 30 historic sites across the United States. FLWR on your membership card indicates that you enjoy the National Reciprocal sites benefit. Benefits vary from site to site. Please check websites listed in this brochure for detailed information on each site. ALABAMA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA FLORIDA 1 Rosenbaum House 2 Taliesin West 3 Hollyhock House 4 Florida Southern College 601 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 12621 N. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD BARNSDALL PARK 750 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT WAY FLORENCE, AL 35630 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-4430 4800 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LAKELAND, FL 33801 256.718.5050 480.860.2700 LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 863.680.4597 ROSENBAUMHOUSE.COM FRANKLLOYDWRIGHT.ORG 323.644.6269 FLSOUTHERN.EDU/FLW WRIGHTINALABAMA.COM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION BARNSDALL.ORG FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: 9AM–4PM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: TOUR HOURS: BOOKSHOP HOURS: 8:30AM–6PM TOUR HOURS: THURS–SUN, 11AM–4PM OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT TOUR TICKETS AVAILABLE AT THE THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS AND NEW Experience firsthand Frank Lloyd MAJOR HOLIDAYS. HOLLYHOCK HOUSE VISITOR’S CENTER YEAR’S DAY. 10AM–4PM Wright’s brilliant ability to integrate TUES–SAT, 10AM–4PM IN BARNSDALL PARK. VISITOR CENTER & GIFT SHOP HOURS: SUN, 1PM–4PM indoor and outdoor spaces at Taliesin Hollyhock House is Wright’s first 9:30AM–4:30PM West—Wright’s winter home, school The Rosenbaum House is the only Los Angeles project. Built between and studio from 1937-1959, located Discover the largest collection of Frank Lloyd Wright-designed 1919 and 1923, it represents his on 600 acres of dramatic desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Taliesin West
    WELCOME TO TALIESIN WEST PRIVATE EVENTS AT TALIESIN WEST Set in the foothills of the McDowell Mountains, Taliesin West is one of Frank Lloyd Wright’s most personal creations. Wright’s vision and legacy continue to thrive at this unique location. A desert escape just minutes from the resorts of Scottsdale, Taliesin West is unlike any other location in the Valley of the Sun to host your event. Here your guests will have the opportunity to engage with Frank Lloyd Wright’s vision and legacy at the only National Historic site in Scottsdale, and one of two UNESCO World Heritage sites in Arizona. Take a private tour of the property, enjoy a performance on an acoustically perfect stage while sipping a glass of wine, and wow your guests with a dinner overlooking the Valley at sunset. Soak up the history, innovation, and awe that can only be found at Taliesin West. EXPLORE THE VENUES PHOTO BY SUNSHINE & REIGN PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO BY SUNSHINE & REIGN PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO BY ANDREW PIELAGE THE CABARET INDOOR Ω SEATS 50 Ω STANDING 60 The Cabaret Theatre is the perfect space for you and your guests to experience the brilliance and delight of a Frank Lloyd Wright design. The unique slope and shape of the room allow for unimpeded views of the small stage below and carry sound perfectly through the space. Perfect for an intimate evening of dining at Wright-designed tables or a performance that offers an PHOTO BY ANDREW PIELAGE exceptional experience found nowhere else. Taliesin West Private Events 2 EXPLORE THE VENUES PHOTO BY TERRY RISHEL GARDEN SQUARES OUTDOOR Ω SEATS 250 Ω STANDING 350 With views of the Music Pavilion, Wright’s Studio, and the McDowell Mountains, the Garden Squares are the perfect venue for groups large or small.
    [Show full text]
  • The 20Th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright National Locator Unity Temple, Oak Park, Illinois
    The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright National Locator Unity Temple, Oak Park, Illinois 87.800° W 87.795° W 87.790° W Erie St N Grove Ave Grove N 41.8902° N, 87.7947° W Ontario St 41.8901° N, 87.7992° W E E 41.890° N 41.890° N Austin Garden Park Scoville Park N Euclid Ave Euclid N N Linden Ave Linden N Forest Ave Forest N Oak Park Ave Park Oak N N Kenilworth Ave Kenilworth N Lake St Unity Temple ! 41.888° N 41.888° N E 41.8878° N, 87.7995° W E North Blvd 41.8874° N, 87.7946° W South Blvd 41.886° N 41.886° N Home Ave Home S Grove Ave Grove S S Euclid Ave Euclid S S Clinton Ave Clinton S S Wesley Ave Wesley S S Oak Park Ave Park Oak S S Kenilworth Ave Kenilworth S 87.800° W 87.795° W Pleasant St 87.790° W Nominated National Historic Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic 1:4,500 Green Space/Park Datum: North American Datum 1983 Property Landmark Production Date: October 2015 0 100 Meters ! Gould Center, Department of Geography ¹ Buffer Zone Center Point Buildings The Pennsylvania State University Frederick C. Robie House, Chicago, Illinois Frederick C. Robie House, Chicago, Illinois 87.600° W 87.598° W 87.596° W Ave Kimbark S 87.594° W 87.592° W S Woodlawn Ave Woodlawn S E 57th St 41.791° N 41.791° N S Kimbark Ave Kimbark S 41.7904° N, 87.5972° W E41.7904 N, 87.5957° W S Ellis Ave Ellis S E S Kenwood Avenue Kenwood S Frederick C.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism Without Modernity: the Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Management Papers Wharton Faculty Research 6-2004 Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F. Guillen University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons Recommended Citation Guillen, M. F. (2004). Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940. Latin American Research Review, 39 (2), 6-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0032 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers/279 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Abstract : Why did machine-age modernist architecture diffuse to Latin America so quickly after its rise in Continental Europe during the 1910s and 1920s? Why was it a more successful movement in relatively backward Brazil and Mexico than in more affluent and industrialized Argentina? After reviewing the historical development of architectural modernism in these three countries, several explanations are tested against the comparative evidence. Standards of living, industrialization, sociopolitical upheaval, and the absence of working-class consumerism are found to be limited as explanations. As in Europe, Modernism
    [Show full text]
  • The 10 Frank Lloyd Wright Buildings You Need to Visit in California
    The 10 Frank Lloyd Wright Buildings You Need to Visit in California insidehook.com/article/architecture-real-estate/best-frank-lloyd-wright-buildings-visit-california Architecture & Real Estate By Alex Lauer / July 9, 2019 Including the one just added to UNESCO’s World Heritage List The Hollyhock House is one of eight Frank Lloyd Wright buildings added to the UNESCO World Heritage List. Joshua White On Sunday, UNESCO announced two additions to its World Heritage List. The first was the Prosecco regions of Italy. The second inductee? The 20th-century architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. 1/5 No, not all 532 of the architect’s completed designs. Rather, the designation includes eight of his most celebrated buildings, one of which you’ll find in California. (Previously, the state only held two sites on the list: the Yosemite and Redwood parks.) Which begs the question: Where can you find the rest of Wright’s West Coast work? While “The Man Who Built America” is best remembered for his Midwestern roots, his California connection is strong, and underrated. He first opened an office in Los Angeles in the early ‘20s, and his output in the Golden State ranged from a Guggenheim sibling in San Francisco to a house built, miraculously, without any 90-degree angles. To help you discover his Californian oeuvre for yourself, we’ve collected the 10 must-see Wright buildings in the state, including a golf resort where you can and should spend the night this summer. Both interior and exterior tours are available of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Hollyhock House.
    [Show full text]
  • E N G L I S H
    Matura Examination 2017 E N G L I S H Advance Information The written Matura examination in English consists of four main sections (total 90 credits in sections I-III): Section I: Listening (credits: 14) Multiple choice and questions Section II: Reading Comprehension (credits: 20) 1. Short answer questions Section III: Use of English (credits: 56) 1. Synonyms 2. Antonyms 3. Word Formation 4. Sentence Transformation 5. Open Cloze Section IV: Writing, approx. 400 words (the mark achieved in this part will make up 50% of the overall mark) Time management: the total time is 240 minutes. We recommend you spend 120 minutes on sections I-III, and 120 minutes on section IV. Write legibly and unambiguously. Spelling is important in all parts of the examination. Use of dictionary: You will be allowed to use a monolingual dictionary after handing in sections I-III. The examination is based on Morgan Meis’s article “Frank Lloyd Wright Tried to Solve the City”, published in the “Critics” section of the May 22, 2014 issue of The New Yorker magazine. Frank Lloyd Wright Tried to Solve the City by MORGAN MEIS In: The New Yorker, May 22, 2014 Frank Lloyd Wright1 hated cities. He thought that they were cramped and crowded, stupidly designed, or, more often, built without any sense of design at all. He once wrote, “To look at the 5 plan of a great City is 5 to look at something like the cross-section of a fibrous tumor.” Wright was always looking for a way to cure the cancer of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Artistic Evolution at the Confluence of Cultures
    Dochaku: Artistic Evolution at the Confluence of Cultures Toshiko Oiyama A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Art, College of Fine Arts University of New South Wales 2011 Acknowledgements Had I known the extent of work required for a PhD research, I would have had a second, and probably a third, thought before starting. My appreciation goes to everyone who made it possible for me to complete the project, which amounts to almost all with whom I came in contact while undertaking the project. Specifically, I would like to thank my supervisors Dr David McNeill, Nicole Ellis, Dr Paula Dawson, Mike Esson and Dr Diane Losche, for their inspiration, challenge, and encouragement. Andrew Christofides was kind to provide me with astute critiques of my practical work, while Dr Vaughan Rees and my fellow PhD students were ever ready with moral support. Special thanks goes to Dr Janet Chan for giving me the first glimpse of the world of academic research, and for her insightful comments on my draft. Ms Hitomi Uchikura and Ms Kazuko Hj were the kind and knowledgeable guides to the contemporary art world in Japan, where I was a stranger. Margaret Blackmore and Mitsuhiro Obora came to my rescue with their friendship and technical expertise in producing this thesis. My sister Setsuko Sprague and my mother Nobuko Oiyama had faith in my ability to complete the task, which kept me afloat. Lastly, a huge thanks goes to my husband Derry Habir. I hold him partly responsible for the very existence of this project – he knew before I ever did that I wanted to do a PhD, and knew when and how to give me a supporting hand in navigating its long process.
    [Show full text]
  • One Man's Quest to Photograph Every Frank Lloyd Wright Structure Ever Built
    One Man's Quest to Photograph Every Frank Lloyd Wright Structure Ever Built architecturaldigest.com /story/frank-lloyd-wright-photographer-andrew-pielage Chris Malloy There are 532 Frank Lloyd Wright structures standing in the world. Phoenix-based photographer Andrew Pielage is on a mission to shoot every one of them. The 39-year-old is the unofficial photographer of the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. So far, he has shot about 50 Wright structures. His quest to shoot Wright’s oeuvre began in 2011, when he first toured Taliesin West, Wright’s former winter home and studio outside Phoenix. Photography wasn’t allowed on that tour. But later a friend connected Pielage with the folks at Taliesin West, and for them Pielage shot the sprawling stone-and-wood compound. The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation loved his work, and he became its unofficial photographer. Since then, Pielage has shot Wright’s Hollyhock House (Los Angeles), Unity Temple (Illinois), Taliesin (Wisconsin), and Fallingwater (Pennsylvania), where he did a three-week residence. “When you have that much time to shoot a property, you get to know the ins and outs,” he says. What impressed him was how, against the grain of the bright shots one typically sees of the house, Fallingwater, on cloudy days, “turns gray so that the building’s personality changes with the environment.” The spirit of Wright’s organic style, of structures inspired by and seamlessly integrated into the natural world, whether desert or city or forest, has challenged Pielage. How can one properly capture this architectural titan’s work? Pielage has developed tricks.
    [Show full text]