<<

Using an integrated approach to characterize alluvial fan hazards – A case study on a highly managed and developed alluvial fan Christy Leonard U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Geotechnical Branch, Geology Section [email protected]

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

. Objective: 1) Define the area where alluvial fan flooding could occur.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

. Objective: 1) Define the area where alluvial fan flooding could occur. 2) Determine the type of alluvial fan flooding in terms of transport processes.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

. Objective: 1) Define the area where alluvial fan flooding could occur. 2) Determine the type of alluvial fan flooding in terms of processes. 3) Characterize the 1-percent-annual- exceedance flood in areas subject to alluvial fan flooding.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

. Objective: 1) Define the area where alluvial fan flooding could occur. 2) Determine the type of alluvial fan flooding in terms of sediment transport processes. 3) Characterize the 1-percent-annual- exceedance flood in areas subject to alluvial fan flooding.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan .

Stage 2. Define areas of active and .

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan landform.

Stage 2. Define areas of active erosion and deposition.

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan landform.

Stage 2. Define areas of active erosion and deposition.

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® Integrated Approach Fan Delineation

Topographic Geomorphic Data

Flow Lines NRCS Soil Map

Contour Lines

Slope

BUILDING STRONG® Integrated Approach Define Active/Inactive Areas

Topographic Geomorphic Data

Drainage Network Patterns Soil Development

Topographic Roughness Morphometric Variables

BUILDING STRONG® Flow Lines

Schwanghart, W., Kuhn, N. J. (2010)

BUILDING STRONG® Study Area . Located in Central Utah (~5,500 ft. elevation) . Semi-arid ► Majority of precipitation falls as snow in the Wasatch Range. ► Summer cloud burst storms. . Westward facing feeds the alluvial fan. ► Maximum elevation of contributing watershed: 10,800 ft.

BUILDING STRONG® FEMA’s 3-Stage Process

Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan landform.

Stage 2. Define areas of active erosion and deposition.

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Toe)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Toe)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Toe)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Toe)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Lateral Bounds)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Lateral Bounds)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation (Lateral Bounds)

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 1: Fan Delineation

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Active and Inactive Areas Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan landform.

Stage 2. Define areas of active erosion and deposition.

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

Geomorphic Timescales (1000s of years)?

Engineering Timescales (100s of years)?

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Recent Time

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map Relative Age

Soil Development Drainage Network Topographic Patterns Roughness

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map - Soil

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map - Soil

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map - Soil

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map - Soil

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map Drainage Network

Younger Older

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map Drainage Network

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map Topographic Roughness

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map Topographic Roughness

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Geomorphic Map

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables:

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area 2) Basin Relief

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area 2) Basin Relief 3) Feeder Length

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area 2) Basin Relief 3) Feeder Channel Length 4) Basin Length

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area 2) Basin Relief 3) Feeder Channel Length 4) Basin Length 5) Fan Length

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Morphometric Variables: 1) Basin Area 2) Basin Relief 3) Feeder Channel Length 4) Basin Length 5) Fan Length 6) Fan Area

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Debris Flow Dominated Fans: • Small basins • Short feeder channels • High relief • Short fan length • Steep fan incline

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Fluvial Dominated Fans: • Large basins • Long feeder channels • Low relief • Long fan length • Shallow fan incline

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

• p = the probability of a at the given point along the feeder channel; • R = ; . • S = the slope of the feeder channel.

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type R = 0.18 S = 2 Degrees

0.11 or 11%

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type Dominate Flooding Type:

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

Fuller, 2012

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Alluvial Fan Flooding Type

1963 Image 2014 Image

Settling Basins Historic Channel

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Active/Inactive Area

BUILDING STRONG® Stage 2: Define Active and Inactive Areas Stage 1. Recognize and characterize alluvial fan landform.

Stage 2. Define areas of active erosion and deposition.

Stage 3. Define and characterize the 100- year flood.

BUILDING STRONG® Questions/References

Bertrand, M., Liebault, F., Piegay, H., 2013. Debris‐flow susceptibility of upland catchments. Nat. Hazards 67. doi:10.1007/s11069‐013‐0575‐4 Christenson, G.E., Purcell, C. (Rus), 1985. Correlation and age of Quaternary alluvial‐fan sequences, Basin and Range province, southwestern United States, in: Geological Society of America Special Papers. Geological Society of America, pp. 115–122.

FEMA, 2003. Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners Appendix G: Guidance for Alluvial Fan Flooding Analysis and Mapping. Frankel, K.L., Dolan, J.F., 2007. Characterizing arid region alluvial fan surface roughness with airborne laser swath mapping digital topographic data. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 112, F02025. doi:10.1029/2006JF000644 Fuller, J., 2012. Evaluation of Potential on Active Alluvial Fans in Central and Western Arizona.

House, P.K., 2005. Using Geology to Improve Flood Hazard Management on Alluvial Fans ‐ an Example from Laughlin, Nevada1. J. Am. Resour. Assoc. 41, 1431–1447. Kellerhals, R., Chruch, M., 1990. Hazard management on fans, with examples from British Columbia, in: Alluvial Fans: A Field Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Melton, M.A., 1965. The Geomorphic and Paleoclimatic Significance of Alluvial Deposits in Southern Arizona. J. Geol. 73, 1–38.

NRC, S., 1996. Alluvial Fan Flooding. Parker, G., Paola, C., Whipple, K.X., Mohrig, D., 1998. Alluvial Fans Formed by Channelized Fluvial and Sheet Flow. I: Theory. J. Hydraul. Eng. 124, 985–995. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(1998)124:10(985) Reitz, M.D., Jerolmack, D.J., Swenson, J.B., 2010. Flooding and flow path selection on alluvial fans and deltas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37. doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.uwyo.edu/10.1029/2009GL041985 Santangelo, N., Daunis‐i‐Estadella, J., Di Crescenzo, G., Di Donato, V., Faillace, P.I., Martín‐Fernández, J.A., Romano, P., Santo, A., Scorpio, V., 2012. Topographic predictors of susceptibility to alluvial fan flooding, Southern Apennines. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 37, 803–817. doi:10.1002/esp.3197 Schwanghart, W., Kuhn, N.J., 2010. TopoToolbox: A set of Matlab functions for topographic analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 25, 770–781. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.12.002 Slingerland, R., Smith, N.D., 2004. Avulsions and Their Deposits. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32, 257–285. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120201

USDA, 1950. Watershed Engineering to Accompany Survey Report, Seivier Lake Watershed, UT: Appendix No. 2.

57 BUILDING STRONG®