I Colorado Government – Fall 2008 Contents A. History of the Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I Colorado Government – Fall 2008 Contents A. History of the Colorado Colorado Government – Fall 2008 Contents A. History of the Colorado Constitution 1 1. Geography 1 2. Colorado Territory, 1861-76 1 3. The 1875-76 Constitutional Convention 4 4. Amendments 5 5. Constitutional Events 6 B. The Bill of Rights and Voting Rights—Articles II and VII 14 1. Religion 15 2. Search and Seizure 25 3. Due Process, Constitutional Equality, and Special Legislation 31 4. Retrospective Legislation, Gun Rights, Eminent Domain, and Juries 33 5. Voting Rights 34 C. The General Assembly and the Governor’s Veto Powers 35 1. Original Art. V Limits 36 2. Other Original Limits 37 3. Amendments 38 4. Applications 38 5. Redistricting 47 D. Courts; Term Limits 61 E. General Purpose Local Governments 66 1. Counties 66 2. Cities and Towns 71 3. Constitutional Home Rule 78 4. Current Home Rule Doctrine 84 5. Home Rule Theory 99 6. Home Rule and Dogs 101 i A. History of the Colorado Constitution1 1. Geography Parts of Colorado have been within the actual or claimed domains of several American Indian nations (notably Ute, Cheyenne and Arapahoe), Spain, France, Mexico, and the Texas Republic. Under U. S. sovereignty, parts of the future state were within Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Utah Territories. A north-south mountain boundary was common to all territorial boundaries before 1859.2 After the first major gold discovery in 1858, the Kansas Territory sector was swarmed with for- tune hunters. In 1859, many of them organized mass meetings followed by a vote to hold a con- vention to establish a new territorial government. The convention adopted an extra-legal consti- tution and government for Jefferson Territory, with boundaries taking in all of present-day Colo- rado and parts of Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska and Kansas. It was the first boundary to bridge the mountains.3 Colorado’s present boundaries were drawn by Congress for the Organic Act establishing Colo- rado Territory in 1861. The Organic Act’s boundaries are two lines of north latitude (37º and 41º) crossed by two meridians measured from Washington (approximately 102º and 109º west of Greenwich) to form the State’s nearly rectangular shape.4 The boundaries have not changed since 1861. A 1903 resurvey of the Colorado-New Mexico boundary on the 37th parallel placed the line north of the original survey by a considerable distance. In 1919, New Mexico sued Colorado to claim the territory between the two lines. This would have shifted most of a town, two villages, and five post offices to New Mexico and disrupted many other settled expectations. The U. S. Su- preme Court rejected the claim, applying the standard rule that a resurvey cannot alter a bound- ary that has been substantially relied upon.5 2. Colorado Territory, 1861-76 In the summer of 1858 William Green Russell and his companions discovered gold at the con- fluence of Cherry Creek and the South Platte, and word spread rapidly and widely. People flooded into the area, soon known as the Pikes Peak gold region. By winter, two clusters of cab- ins and tents faced each other across Cherry Creek. Auraria, named for a place in Georgia, had residents mostly from Georgia and Nebraska and was “a moral place.” Across the creek was the hamlet later named Denver, in honor of General James W. Denver, Governor of Kansas Terri- tory. Denver’s residents haled primarily from Kansas and Missouri and indulged in more “drink- ing and humbugging.” During the winter of 1859, the newly arrived miners were cabin-bound and consumed with poli- tics. The miners, in an election hotly contested between the “drinking element” and those who abstained, and with a cigar box for a polling booth, elected a representative to Congress, Hiram Graham. He had a mandate to lobby Congress for separate territorial status for the Pikes Peak 1 See generally Dale A. Oesterle & Richard B. Collins, The Colorado State Constitution 1-25 (2002). 2 See Thomas J. Noel, Paul F. Mahoney & Richard E. Stevens, Historical Atlas of Colorado (1994), at parts II, VI. 3 See 2 Sources and Documents of U.S. Constitutions (William F. Swindler, ed. 1973), at 16-22. 4 See Frederic L. Paxson, “The Boundaries of Colorado,” 2 U. Colo. Studies 87 (1904); Historical Atlas of Colo- rado, supra, part II. 5 New Mexico v. Colorado, 267 U.S. 30 (1925). 1 area, but Congress did not respond. Impatient mining communities sent representatives in the spring of 1859 to convene at Uncle Dick Wootton’s Tavern on Cherry Creek for the purpose of founding a new state. The group set grand boundaries, named the new State of Jefferson, and made preparations for a constitutional convention. There was no lengthy discussion because the delegates were all in haste to get through. Voters of the embryonic State of Jefferson rejected the constitution on September 5th, however, expressing a marked preference for territorial status. The trappings of statehood looked to be far too expensive and the stability of the mining camp economy far too unsteady. Undeterred, the mining communities elected a delegate to Congress from the self-proclaimed Territory of Jefferson and chose delegates to found a provisional territorial government. The delegates met in a Denver saloon, the Apollo Hall, wrote a territorial constitution in a single day, modeled on the rejected State of Jefferson constitution, and submitted the new constitution and a full slate of territorial officers to local citizens on October 24. Many did not vote, but those who cast ballots overwhelmingly favored the territorial constitution. The general assembly of Jeffer- son Territory met in November and began passing laws, anticipating federal recognition. In 1860 Denver citizens, dissatisfied with the illegitimate, provisional Jefferson Territory legisla- ture, organized and created a constitution for an illegitimate, provisional “People’s Government of Denver.” The preamble professed loyalty to the federal Constitution and the laws of Kansas Territory but noted that, because no immediate protection was available from either, the law of self-preservation necessitated the creation of a temporary government “to protect our lives and . property from the lawless.” Voters ratified the Denver constitution and elected officers on Oc- tober 1. The last municipal election under it was held in April of 1861. In 1860 the Denver area, then, had three governments competing for jurisdiction, a county of Kansas Territory, a county of Jefferson Territory, and the People’s Government of Denver. Congress preempted the provisional governments by establishing Colorado Territory on Febru- ary 28, 1861. The month before, Congress had admitted Kansas as a state with its present boundaries, and, compelled to cope with the Pikes Peak part of Kansas Territory and its maver- ick governments, passed the Organic Act creating Colorado Territory with the state’s present boundaries.6 At the time the Act passed, seven southern states had seceded, and most of their senators had left Washington. Their absence removed the major opposition to the creation of new western territories. The ink had barely dried on the territorial act when proponents of statehood renewed their peti- tions to Congress. The struggle involved sharp conflicts both locally and nationally. The local conflict revolved around the costs and benefits to residents of statehood. The national conflict was one of partisan politics—the new state’s single representative and two senators were likely to be Republicans. Statehood required that those who favored it have a majority in both local and national counsels at the same time. The first formal step toward statehood at the national level occurred early in 1864, when Con- gress passed and President Lincoln signed an Enabling Act for the State of Colorado. It was a presidential election year, and Lincoln was looking for more Republican electoral votes to aid his re-election. Coloradans, if they could move quickly to form a state, were likely to send three 6 Act of Feb. 28, 1861, c.59, 12 Stat. 172. 2 Republicans to the Electoral College. The Enabling Act required, therefore, that Colorado have a constitution in place by September of that year. Coloradans elected delegates to a constitutional convention, which produced a proposed state constitution. In the September 1864 election, the constitution failed by a wide margin, 1,520 for to 4,672 against. Those opposing statehood were concerned about tax increases (due to with- drawal of federal subsidies for officials’ salaries), adding to the Republican majority in Con- gress, and the extension of federal conscription laws to Colorado’s large community of draft- evaders.7 With conscription no longer at issue, sentiment in Colorado shifted towards statehood in 1865, and citizens elected delegates to yet another convention, which produced another proposed state constitution on August 12. Voters approved it in September 1865 by a thin margin of two hun- dred votes and in November elected state officers, all Republicans. In December the new state legislature met in Golden, elected Republican Senators, and adjourned to await a presidential declaration of statehood. It never came. President Johnson was sympathetic to the Democrats and not eager to add more Republican representatives to an already hostile Congress. He refused to proclaim Colorado a state, asserting that the conditions of the Enabling Act of 1864 had not been met. According to Johnson, the 1865 Constitution lacked “legal authority” and had been “irregularly obtained.” The Republican-controlled Congress rushed to recognize the new state regardless and twice, in 1865 and again in 1866, passed bills to admit Colorado to the Union. President Johnson vetoed both. The Senate failed to override the second veto by only three votes.8 Agitation for statehood continued until the spring of 1868, when the last attempt was made to have Congress legitimize the 1865 Constitution.
Recommended publications
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • John Lawrence of Saguache
    COLORADO I : 'ACAS ~ A " '" ··:// ,,, : ' r •oun ~ r--R' -0 - 6'- A N-C -0 -_l___----, 0R A N 0 ) ••oc. ~~ GAR"<eo (S"M?-- The Town Boom in Las Animas and Baca Counties Morris F. Taylor was professor of history at Trinidad State Junior College until his death in 1979. Well known for his contribution to the historical scholarship of Colorado and New Mexico, he won two certificates of commendation for his writings from the American Asso­ ciation for State and Local History and the 1974 LeRoy R. Hafen Award for the best article in The Colorado Maga­ zine. His two major books are First Mail West: Stage Lines on the Santa Fe Trail (1971) and 0. P. McMains and the Maxwell Land Grant Conflict (1979). He held a mas­ ter's degree from Cornell University and was awarded an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from the Univer­ sity of Colorado in 1969. 112 THE COLORADO MAGAZINE 55/2 and 3 1978 Las Animas and Baca Counties 113 In the late 1880s southeastern Colorado experienced boom condi­ Town Company. Probably named for Two Buttes, a prominent land­ tions that were short-Jived. Several years of unusually good rainfall mark in that flat country, the place was abandoned the next year, most over much of the Great Plains had aroused unquestioning hopes and of the people moving to a new town, Minneapolis, which had a more speculative greeds, bringing on land rushes and urban developments attractive site not far away.5 In November of that year the incorpora­ that were the first steps toward the dust bowls of the twentieth century .1 tion papers of the Clyde Land and Town Company, signed by men Similar to the many land development schemes in the West today that from Kansas and Rhode Island and Las Animas County in Colorado, are unplanned, quick-profit enterprises, land rushes and town promo­ were filed with the Las Animas County clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadway East (Running North and South)
    ROTATION OF DENVER STREETS (with Meaning) The following information was obtained and re-organized from the book; Denver Streets: Names, Numbers, Locations, Logic by Phil H. Goodstein This book includes additional information on how the grid came together. Please email [email protected] with any corrections/additions found. Copy: 12-29-2016 Running East & West from Broadway South Early businessman who homesteaded West of Broadway and South of University of Denver Institutes of Higher Learning First Avenue. 2000 ASBURY AVE. 50 ARCHER PL. 2100 EVANS AVE.` 2700 YALE AVE. 100 BAYAUD AVE. 2200 WARREN AVE. 2800 AMHERST AVE. 150 MAPLE AVE. 2300 ILIFF AVE. 2900 BATES AVE. 200 CEDAR AVE. 2400 WESLEY AVE. 3000 CORNELL AVE. 250 BYERS PL. 2500 HARVARD AVE. 3100 DARTMOUTH 300 ALAMEDA AVE. 2600 VASSAR AVE. 3200 EASTMAN AVE. 3300 FLOYD AVE. 3400 GIRARD AVE. Alameda Avenue marked the city 3500 HAMPDEN AVE. limit until the town of South 3600 JEFFERSON AVE. Denver was annexed in 3700 KENYON AVE. 1894. Many of the town’s east- 3800 LEHIGH AVE. west avenues were named after 3900 MANSFIELD AVE. American states and 4000 NASSAU AVE. territories, though without any 4100 OXFORD AVE. clear pattern. 4200 PRINCETON AVE. 350 NEVADA PL. 4300 QUINCY AVE. 400 DAKOTA AVE. 4400 RADCLIFF AVE. 450 ALASKA PL. 4500 STANFORD AVE. 500 VIRGINIA AVE. 4600 TUFTS AVE. 600 CENTER AVE. 4700 UNION AVE. 700 EXPOSITION AVE. 800 OHIO AVE. 900 KENTUCKY AVE As the city expanded southward some 1000 TENNESSEE AVE. of the alphabetical system 1100 MISSISSIPPI AVE. disappeared in favor 1200 ARIZONA AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the State Historical and Natural History Society of Colorado
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by The State Historical and Natural History Society of Colorado VOL. Ill Denver Colorado, August, 1926 NO. 3 The Colorado Constitution By Henry J. Hersey (Formerly Judge of the District Court of Denver) Colorado's admission to the Union is not alone significant because it occurred 100 years after the Declaration of Independ­ ence, but also because the efforts for governmental independence were accompanied by heroic and almost revolutionary (though peaceful) acts. The early settlers and gold seekers of 1858 found themselves in a country which the various explorers had reported as a barren desert and worthless for human habitation ; though nominally a part of the Territory of Kansas, yet it was so remote, because of the slow means of transportation and communication, that it was outside the pale of governmental consideration or interest, and the pioneers were forced by existing conditions to establish some sort of a government, provide courts and make laws for themselves. So on the plains we find them quickly creating the People's Courts by the methods of pure democracies, assemblies of the peo­ ple hurriedly called together and accused persons brought before them and tried before a judge selected from the people, the people themselves acting as a jury ;1 in the mountains a civil, rather than a criminal, court was the need of the hour and the Miners' Court was created, having, however, both civil and criminal jurisdiction. The Miners' Court was also established by the mass meeting meth­ ods used in the ancient, pure democracies, for representative or republican form of government is always a matter of growth and later development.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Jefferson Territory's First and Only General Assembly in 1859
    "In a dry and thirsty land it is necessary to divert the waters of the streams from the natural channels, in order to obtain the fruits of the soil, and this necessity is so universal and imperious that it claims recognition of the law." (Chief Justice Moses Hallett from his Territorial Supreme Court Opinion in the case of Yunker v. Nichols in 1872.) Chief Justice Moses Hallett In the Jefferson Territory’s first and only General Assembly in 1859-1860, the “Short Act Concerning Irrigation” set out laws of water rights for irrigation. It drew on the codes that miners set up in their courts allowing water diversions to their mine operations. These early laws prevented the application of the riparian rights rules which had two central principles - that the right to use water lay only with the owners of land along a water course, and that a user could not appreciably alter the flow of a stream. Either principle would have made western irrigation impossible as the entire purpose of canal and ditch building was to bring water to properties away from the stream and allow it to soak into the fields. The riparian rule also meant that corporate monopolies could be formed to control the “liquid gold” for mining as well as for irrigation. In 1861 the “Irrigation Statute,” passed which provided for private rights of way through land for the construction of water ditches. This also reflected the opinion that the necessity for water by the public outweighed the rights of individual property owners. Ten years later much of this early law was tested when Jason Yunker brought suit against Andrew Nichols for diverting all the waters from a jointly constructed irrigation canal passing from Bear Creek through the defendant's farm to that of the plaintiff's.
    [Show full text]
  • Qlqarlr11 Lf(Tug11leu Tu 1.Gtttlr 1£Onhou by WILLIAM J
    Qlqarlr11 lf(tug11leu tu 1.Gtttlr 1£onhou BY WILLIAM J. BAKER In 1874 Charles Kingsley, the Victorian novelist, clergyman, and social reformer, toured the United States, lecturing to large and enthusiastic audiences from New York to San Francisco. In June and July he concluded his tour with a restful sojourn in Colorado Springs, a small town which, because of its sizable and influential English population, was beginning to be called ''Little London." Why did Kingsley visit the town? What con­ nections did he have there? How was he received? What was his response to the Pikes Peak region and its inhabitants? Answers to these questions tell a great deal not only about Charles Kingsley and the early English flavor of Colorado Springs, but also about British interest in frontier Colorado in the 1870's. When General William J. Palmer, the founder of Colorado Springs, and his youthful bride Queen honeymooned in England in 1870, they were entertained for several days in Kingsley's rectory at Eversley. Palmer used the time for soliciting capital for his railway-building on the American frontier, but Queen was most intent on observing and coming to know her famous host, whose novels Alton Locke, Hypatia, and Westward Ho! CoLorado Springs in the 1870's. 188 THE COLORADO MAGAZINE XLV/3 1968 Charles Kingsley in Little London 189 were as well-known in America as in England. She recorded room.4 When she returned to England in March, 1872, Rose her initial impressions in a diary: conveyed to her father the romance of frontier life in Colorado Drove to Eversley-where Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • MORE THAN a HIGHWAY the Story of a Global Tolling Industry Pioneer
    E-470: MORE THAN A HIGHWAY The Story of a Global Tolling Industry Pioneer Thomas J. Noel Copyright © 2018 E-470 Public Highway Authority All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission from the copyright holder. Printed in the USA Cover design and book layout: David Sikora, Twenty Twenty Design ISBN 978-0-9998319-0-8 ii Acknowledgments Dan Christopherson, Christopherson and Company, over 29-year public relations consultant to E-470, led this project to tell E-470’s story. Dan headed the project serving as an essential collaborator, providing documents, records, photos, clippings, editing, and setting up interviews. Jo Ellen Snell is a 21-year former employee in finance, toll operations, right-of-way acquisition, communications, and incident management. Jo identified and scheduled interviewees, helped gather historic materials and photos, fact-checked, in addition to editing the manuscript. Evan West, a star M.A. Public History Student at the University of Colorado Denver, served as the invaluable research assistant on this project. He conducted research, interviews, first draft writing, editing and anything else asked of him. For interviews, images and other assistance, I am indebted to John Arnold, E-470’s first Executive Director; Mike Callis, former E-470 Right-Of-Way Director; Jessica Carson, E-470 Manager of Communications and Tolling Services; Steve Cramer, first Chair of the Board; George Decker, E-470 Operations Electrician; Tom Eggert, former Board Member; Jeff Egnor, Road Management Supervisor; Dick Fontane, Investment banker/broker, George K.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Office of Lt
    Colorado Office of Lt. Governor Data Sheet As of July 22, 2016 History of Office The Office of the Lt. Governor of Colorado was established with the state constitution of 1876.1 Origins of the Office The Office of the Lt. Governor of Colorado was established with constitution of 1876 as the gubernatorial successor. Qualifications for Office The Council of State Governments (CSG) publishes the Book of the States (BOS) 2015. In chapter 4, Table 4.13 lists the Qualifications and Terms of Office for lieutenant governors: The Book of the States 2015 (CSG) at www.csg.org. Method of Election The National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA) maintains a list of the methods of electing gubernatorial successors at: http://www.nlga.us/lt-governors/office-of-lieutenant- governor/methods-of-election/. Duties and Powers A lieutenant governor may derive responsibilities one of four ways: from the Constitution, from the Legislature through statute, from the governor (thru gubernatorial appointment or executive order), thru personal initiative in office, and/or a combination of these. The principal and shared constitutional responsibility of every gubernatorial successor is to be the first official in the line of succession to the governor’s office. Succession to Office of Governor In the election of 1904, Alva Adams was thought to have won, however, Republicans, who still controlled the state legislature, insisted that owing to fraud and corruption the election was stolen from James Hamilton Peabody. On the day that Alva Adams took office on March 17, 1905, the Republican-controlled legislature voted to remove him from office and reinstall Peabody, on the condition that Peabody immediately resign.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Format to Allow Free Public Access
    Adopted Budget 2020-2021 www.westminsterpublicschools.org | 7002 Raleigh Street | Westminster CO 80030 ADOPTED BUDGET | 2020-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUPERINTENDENT BUDGET MESSAGE ................................................................................ 1 FINANCIAL SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER ...................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND AWARDS ................................................................................. 5 BOARD OF EDUCATION ...................................................................................................... 7 CENTRAL OFFICE ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................... 8 DISTRICT ORGANIZATION................................................................................................... 8 BUDGET SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 10 BUDGET FORECAST ........................................................................................................ 28 SIGNIFICANT EVENTS ...................................................................................................... 31 ORGANIZATIONAL SECTION PROFILE OF GOVERNMENT .............................................................................................. 37 SERVICES AND PROGRAMS OFFERED .............................................................................. 37 DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pippin Hill Farm Diane Burns
    Diane Burns Horticulturalist, Pippin Hill Farm & Vineyards Meet horticulturist Diane Burns – the green thumbed plant whisperer of Pippin Hill Farm & Vineyards in the heart of Thomas Jefferson territory. With over 20 years of experience tending some of the country’s finest gardens, including Monticello and Virginia House, Diane can now be found under her wide brim hat seeding, planting and pruning the grounds of Pippin Hill Farm. Her passion is rooted in cultivating vegetables and fruits to be consumed at the restaurant overlooking the gardens. A native Virginian, Diane spent the first eight years of her career as a Foreign Service Security Officer with the US Department of State, including a two-year tour in Morocco, before moving to the Charlottesville area in 1995 with her husband and two young children. After taking some horticulture classes, she realized her true calling was an earthier sort of fieldwork. “I fell in love with nature, in its truest form. I love being outdoors, getting my hands dirty, seeing things germinate, blossom and fruit. The outcome is so rewarding,” she says. Her first horticulture job was as a garden guide through an abundance of well-kept heirloom varietals on the grounds of Jefferson’s Monticello, and then tending the gardens at Richmond’s historic Virginia House— home to classic English country-style gardens. The two very different landscapes provided ideal learning grounds. Pippin Hill Farm extended an opportunity to make the sprawling acres her domain to develop and expand the kitchen garden program. Diane’s ambitious initiatives started with the addition of new garden beds in fall 2015, including a 70-foot- long bed with room to grow rhubarb, gooseberries and Mara des Bois strawberries that only grow 6 months of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • WHERE LIFE IS WRITTEN in WATER Why Water Issues Unite, Divide, and Matter So Much in Colorado
    WHERE LIFE IS WRITTEN IN WATER Why Water Issues Unite, Divide, and Matter So Much in Colorado by Greg Walcher Natural Resources Group Grand Junction — Washington, DC IP-1-2021 • March 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is a simple reason why water is Coloradans should resist efforts to change so contentious in Colorado: there isn’t their unique system of water law. That enough. There never has been, and never system, developed in Colorado, forms will be, enough water to supply nearly six the basis of all western water law, and million residents, much less 90 million reopening long-settled issues could people in 16 other states who depend at subject Colorado’s future to decisions in least partly on Colorado water. more populous and powerful states. Colorado averages about 16.5 inches The amount of water stored, for use in of precipitation a year, but much of it Colorado, can be significantly increased: evaporates before ever reaching the • By enlarging already existing streams. It comes mostly in the form of reservoirs, either slightly raising snow, mostly within a four-month period, the dam height, or dredging silt to then it melts and runs rapidly out of the increase the depth, state. Put simply, life in the Centennial • And by adding additional reservoirs State depends on the ability to store water in carefully selected areas, especially during the wet periods, for use during the small sites off the main streams, dry periods. where dams have a much smaller environmental impact. Water must be stored in Colorado, or lost to downstream uses.
    [Show full text]