DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix. Excerpts of Letter from Johannes Kepler to David Fabricius, 11 October 1605

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix. Excerpts of Letter from Johannes Kepler to David Fabricius, 11 October 1605 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACE IN SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PHYSICS by David Marshall Miller Bachelor of Arts, Yale University, 1999 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2006 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by David Marshall Miller It was defended on April 10, 2006 and approved by John Earman, University Professor, Department of History and Philosophy of Science Paolo Palmieri, Assistant Professor, Department of History and Philosophy of Science Jonathan Scott, Carroll Amundson Professor of British History, Department of History Dissertation Co-Director: Peter K. Machamer, Professor, Department of History and Philosophy of Science Dissertation Co-Director: James E. McGuire, Professor, Department of History and Philosophy of Science ii Copyright © by David Marshall Miller 2006 iii REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACE IN SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PHYSICS David Marshall Miller, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2006 The changing understanding of the universe that characterized the birth of modern science included a fundamental shift in the prevailing representation of space – the presupposed conceptual structure that allows one to intelligibly describe the spatial properties of physical phenomena. At the beginning of the seventeenth century, the prevailing representation of space was spherical. Natural philosophers first assumed a spatial center, then specified meanings with reference to that center. Directions, for example, were described in relation to the center, and locations were specified by distance from the center. Through a series of attempts to solve problems first raised by the work of Copernicus, this Aristotelian, spherical framework was replaced by a rectilinear representation of space. By the end of the seventeenth century, descriptions were understood by reference to linear orientations, as parallel or oblique to a presupposed line, and locations were identified without reference to a privileged central point. This move to rectilinear representations of space enabled Gilbert, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, and Newton to describe and explain the behavior of the physical world in the novel ways for which these men are justly famous, including their theories of gravitational attraction and inertia. In other words, the shift towards a rectilinear representation of space was essential to the fundamental reconception of the universe that gave rise to both modern physical theory and, at the same time, the linear way of experiencing the world that characterizes modern science. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE....................................................................................................................................IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION: PHYSICAL UNDERSTANDING AND REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACE............................................................................................. 1 1.1 THREE LEVELS OF UNDERSTANDING...................................................... 2 1.1.1 Explanations and Descriptions .................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Descriptions and Concepts........................................................................... 9 1.1.3 Representations of Space............................................................................ 14 1.1.4 Reciprocal Iteration.................................................................................... 20 1.2 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION................................................................... 25 1.2.1 Historical Description................................................................................. 25 1.2.2 Historical Explanation................................................................................ 27 1.3 DISTINCTION FROM THE LITERATURE: JAMMER AND KOYRÉ.. 31 1.4 PLAN OF CHAPTERS ..................................................................................... 37 2.0 PLURIBUS ERGO EXISTENTIBUS CENTRIS: COPERNICUS, ASTRONOMICAL DESCRIPTIONS, AND THE “THIRD MOTION”.............................. 39 2.1 SPHERICAL UNIVERSE ................................................................................ 41 2.2 SCHOLASTIC PHYSICS................................................................................. 44 2.3 PTOLEMY’S DESCRIPTIVE AIMS.............................................................. 46 2.4 COPERNICUS’S REDESCRIPTION............................................................. 48 2.5 DIFFICULTIES RAISED................................................................................. 51 2.6 THE “THIRD MOTION”................................................................................. 55 2.7 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 57 3.0 GILBERT’S “VERTICITY” AND THE “LAW OF THE WHOLE” .................. 62 3.1 GILBERT’S RESPONSE TO COPERNICUS ............................................... 62 v 3.2 THE DE MAGNETE.......................................................................................... 65 3.2.1 Book I ........................................................................................................... 65 3.2.2 Book II.......................................................................................................... 67 3.2.3 The Instantiation of the Geographical Representation of Space............ 71 3.2.4 Books III-IV: Magnetic Motions .............................................................. 73 3.2.5 Book VI: The Earth’s Motions ................................................................. 76 3.2.6 A Blind Alley ............................................................................................... 79 3.3 GILBERT’S TREATMENT OF THE “THIRD MOTION”: VERTICITY AND THE LAW OF THE WHOLE................................................................................. 82 3.4 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 86 4.0 KEPLER AND THE DISCOVERY OF COSMIC LINEARITY ......................... 88 4.1 PROLOGUE: O MALE FACTUM!................................................................. 88 4.2 INTRODUCTION: SOURCES AND AIMS.................................................. 89 4.3 BACKGROUND: RELIGIOUS EPISTEMOLOGY .................................... 91 4.4 SETTING UP ..................................................................................................... 95 4.5 THE PROBLEM OF SHAPE: THE ELLIPSE ............................................. 97 4.6 THE PROBLEM OF DISTANCE: THE SECANT MODEL ...................... 99 4.7 THE PROBLEM OF LONGITUDE: THE ELLIPSE................................ 105 4.8 THE PROBLEM OF EXPLANATION: CONSIDERATION OF CAUSES.. ........................................................................................................................... 112 4.9 THE PROBLEM OF DIRECTION: GILBERT’S LAW OF THE WHOLE AND THE MAGNETIC BALANCE .............................................................................. 114 4.10 THE PROBLEM OF SINES AND COSINES: SUMS OF FORCE .......... 124 4.11 CONCLUSION: THE STATUS OF LINES IN GILBERT AND KEPLER... ........................................................................................................................... 130 5.0 INERTIAL DEFLECTIONS, REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACE, AND GALILEAN INERTIA ............................................................................................................. 140 5.1 THE PROBLEM OF FREE FALL................................................................ 141 5.2 HUNTERS AND CANNONS.......................................................................... 145 5.3 RECTILINEAR AND SPHERICAL SPACE............................................... 151 5.3.1 Large-Scale Space ..................................................................................... 151 vi 5.3.2 Small-Scale Space...................................................................................... 157 5.4 LINEAR AND CIRCULAR INERTIA ......................................................... 160 5.5 CONCEPT OF INERTIA ............................................................................... 166 5.6 THE ARCHIMEDEAN APPROXIMATION............................................... 170 5.7 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 173 6.0 PROMOTION TO THE FOUNDATIONS: CARTESIAN SPACE .................. 176 6.1 DESCARTES’ CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ........................................ 177 6.2 DESCARTES’ REPRESENTATION OF SPACE ....................................... 181 6.3 THE ORIGINS OF CARTESIAN SPACE ................................................... 184 6.3.1 Optics ......................................................................................................... 185 6.3.2 Geometry ................................................................................................... 188 6.4 PLACE AND MOTION IN THE RULES ..................................................... 191 6.5 THE WORLD ................................................................................................... 193 6.6 COSMIC VORTICES..................................................................................... 196 6.7 PLACE AND MOTION IN THE PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY ......... 199 6.8 ARBITRARY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESO's VLT Sphere and DAMIT
    ESO’s VLT Sphere and DAMIT ESO’s VLT SPHERE (using adaptive optics) and Joseph Durech (DAMIT) have a program to observe asteroids and collect light curve data to develop rotating 3D models with respect to time. Up till now, due to the limitations of modelling software, only convex profiles were produced. The aim is to reconstruct reliable nonconvex models of about 40 asteroids. Below is a list of targets that will be observed by SPHERE, for which detailed nonconvex shapes will be constructed. Special request by Joseph Durech: “If some of these asteroids have in next let's say two years some favourable occultations, it would be nice to combine the occultation chords with AO and light curves to improve the models.” 2 Pallas, 7 Iris, 8 Flora, 10 Hygiea, 11 Parthenope, 13 Egeria, 15 Eunomia, 16 Psyche, 18 Melpomene, 19 Fortuna, 20 Massalia, 22 Kalliope, 24 Themis, 29 Amphitrite, 31 Euphrosyne, 40 Harmonia, 41 Daphne, 51 Nemausa, 52 Europa, 59 Elpis, 65 Cybele, 87 Sylvia, 88 Thisbe, 89 Julia, 96 Aegle, 105 Artemis, 128 Nemesis, 145 Adeona, 187 Lamberta, 211 Isolda, 324 Bamberga, 354 Eleonora, 451 Patientia, 476 Hedwig, 511 Davida, 532 Herculina, 596 Scheila, 704 Interamnia Occultation Event: Asteroid 10 Hygiea – Sun 26th Feb 16h37m UT The magnitude 11 asteroid 10 Hygiea is expected to occult the magnitude 12.5 star 2UCAC 21608371 on Sunday 26th Feb 16h37m UT (= Mon 3:37am). Magnitude drop of 0.24 will require video. DAMIT asteroid model of 10 Hygiea - Astronomy Institute of the Charles University: Josef Ďurech, Vojtěch Sidorin Hygiea is the fourth-largest asteroid (largest is Ceres ~ 945kms) in the Solar System by volume and mass, and it is located in the asteroid belt about 400 million kms away.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Ptolemaic Tradition and Its Adoption and Replacement in Colonial America
    The Origins of the Ptolemaic Tradition and its Adoption and Replacement in Colonial America Master Thesis By Ben Baumann 11592583 June 2018 University of Amsterdam Graduate School of Humanities Master’s Program in Classics and Ancient Civilizations: Ancient Studies First Supervisor: Dr. Jan Willem van Henten Second Supervisor: Dr. Fred Spier Baumann 1 I. Introduction The mapping of the universe and the attempt to understand the cosmos through scholarly investigation has been a constant endeavor of the human race since ancient times. This investigation is known as cosmography. In this thesis, I will analyze how early Colonial American scholars made sense of ancient Greek understandings of cosmography. In particular, I will focus on the way these Greek ideas shaped American thinking not only about the cosmos itself, but also about the way cosmographic understanding became intertwined with views about God and theology. When they first arrived in North America, Colonial Americans generally had a cosmography that was based on the Ptolemaic tradition. But, once they became established in the new world, and especially after the founding of Harvard University, a cosmographic revolution taking place in Europe would begin to resonate in the so-called New World. Thus, some Colonial American scholars willingly engaged in contemplation of the new outlook and proved receptive to the ideas of Nicolas Copernicus. Not surprisingly, in a land where scientific and religious thought overlapped so extensively, this caused heated scholarly debate over the topic and even resulted in student protests at Harvard University. The record of these debates can be traced back to the 17th-century writings of Colonial America, such as several astronomical almanacs, that since have been preserved as vitally significant artifacts of intellectual life in the colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California, San Diego
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO THE SCIENCE OF THE STARS IN DANZIG FROM RHETICUS TO HEVELIUS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Derek Jensen Committee in charge: Professor Robert S. Westman, Chair Professor Luce Giard Professor John Marino Professor Naomi Oreskes Professor Donald Rutherford 2006 The dissertation of Derek Jensen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2006 iii FOR SARA iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page........................................................................................................... iii Dedication ................................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... v List of Figures ........................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments..................................................................................................... vii Vita, Publications and Fields of Study...................................................................... x A Note on Dating
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin and How the Situation Has Gone from One Mt Tarana Observatory of Trying to Fill Pages to One of Fitting Everything In
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 33, NUMBER 2, A.D. 2006 APRIL-JUNE 29. PHOTOMETRY OF ASTEROIDS 133 CYRENE, adjusted up or down to line up with the V-band data). The near- 454 MATHESIS, 477 ITALIA, AND 2264 SABRINA perfect overlay of V- and R-band data show no evidence of color change as the asteroid rotates. This result replicates the lightcurve Robert K. Buchheim period reported by Harris et al. (1984), and matches the period and Altimira Observatory lightcurve shape reported by Behrend (2005) at his website. 18 Altimira, Coto de Caza, CA 92679 USA [email protected] (Received: 4 November Revised: 21 November) Photometric studies of asteroids 133 Cyrene, 454 Mathesis, 477 Italia and 2264 Sabrina are reported. The lightcurve period for Cyrene of 12.707±0.015 h (with amplitude 0.22 mag) confirms prior studies. The lightcurve period of 8.37784±0.00003 h (amplitude 0.32 mag) for Mathesis differs from previous studies. For Italia, color indices (B-V)=0.87±0.07, (V-R)=0.48±0.05, and phase curve parameters H=10.4, G=0.15 have been determined. For Sabrina, this study provides the first reported lightcurve period 43.41±0.02 h, with 0.30 mag amplitude. Altimira Observatory, located in southern California, is equipped with a 0.28-m Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope (Celestron NexStar- 454 Mathesis. DiMartino et al. (1994) reported a rotation period of 11 operating at F/6.3), and CCD imager (ST-8XE NABG, with 7.075 h with amplitude 0.28 mag for this asteroid, based on two Johnson-Cousins filters).
    [Show full text]
  • Perturbations in the Motion of the Quasicomplanar Minor Planets For
    Publications of the Department of Astronom} - Beograd, N2 ID, 1980 UDC 523.24; 521.1/3 osp PERTURBATIONS IN THE MOTION OF THE QUASICOMPLANAR MI­ NOR PLANETS FOR THE CASE PROXIMITIES ARE UNDER 10000 KM J. Lazovic and M. Kuzmanoski Institute of Astronomy, Faculty of Sciences, Beograd Received January 30, 1980 Summary. Mutual gravitational action during proximities of 12 quasicomplanar minor pla­ nets pairs have been investigated, whose minimum distances were under 10000 km. In five of the pairs perturbations of several orbital elements have been stated, whose amounts are detectable by observations from the Earth. J. Lazovic, M. Kuzmanoski, POREMECAJI ELEMENATA KRETANJA KVAZIKOM­ PLANARNIH MALIH PLANETA U PROKSIMITETIMA NJIHOVIH PUTANJA SA DA­ LJINAMA MANJIM OD 10000 KM - Ispitali smo medusobna gravitaciona de;stva pri proksi­ mitetima 12 parova kvazikomplanarnih malih planeta sa minimalnim daljinama ispod 10000 km. Kod pet parova nadeni su poremecaji u vi~e putanjskih elemenata, ~iji bi se iznosi mogli ustano­ viti posmatranjima sa Zemlje. Earlier we have found out 13 quasicomplanar minor planets pairs (the angle I between their orbital planes less than O~500), whose minimum mutual distances (pmin) were less than 10000 km (Lazovic, Kuzmanoski, 1978). The shortest pro­ ximity distance of only 600 km among these pairs has been stated with minor planet pair (215) Oenone and 1851 == 1950 VA. The corresponding perturbation effects in this pair have been calculated (Lazovic, Kuzmanoski, 1979a). This motivated us to investigate the mutual perturbing actions in the 12 remaining minor planets pairs for the case they found themselves within the proximities of their correspon­ ding orbits.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus and Tycho Brahe
    THE NEWTONIAN REVOLUTION – Part One Philosophy 167: Science Before Newton’s Principia Class 2 16th Century Astronomy: Copernicus and Tycho Brahe September 9, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Copernican Revolution .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Ptolemaic Astronomy: e.g. Longitudes of Mars ................................................................... 1 B. A Problem Raised for Philosophy of Science ....................................................................... 2 C. Background: 13 Centuries of Ptolemaic Astronomy ............................................................. 4 D. 15th Century Planetary Astronomy: Regiomantanus ............................................................. 5 E. Nicolaus Copernicus: A Brief Biography .............................................................................. 6 F. Copernicus and Ibn al-Shāţir (d. 1375) ……………………………………………………. 7 G. The Many Different Copernican Revolutions ........................................................................ 9 H. Some Comments on Kuhn’s View of Science ……………………………………………... 10 II. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelstium (1543) ..................................................................................... 11 A. From Basic Ptolemaic to Basic Copernican ........................................................................... 11 B. A New Result: Relative Orbital Radii ................................................................................... 12 C. Orbital
    [Show full text]
  • From Natural Philosophy to Natural Science: the Entrenchment of Newton's Ideal of Empirical Success
    From Natural Philosophy to Natural Science: The Entrenchment of Newton's Ideal of Empirical Success Pierre J. Boulos Graduate Pro gram in Philosophy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Graduate Studies The Universly of Western Ontario London, Ontario April 1999 O Pierre J- Boulos 1999 National Library Bibliotheque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Your Me Voue reference Our file Notre rddrence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde me licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliotheque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, preter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/£ih, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format electronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriete du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protege cette these. thesis nor substantial extracts &om it Ni la these ni des extraits substantieis may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent Stre imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT William Harper has recently proposed that Newton's ideal of empirical success as exempli£ied in his deductions fiom phenomena informs the transition fiom natural philosophy to natural science. This dissertation examines a number of methodological themes arising fiom the Principia and that purport to exemplifjr Newton's ideal of empirical success.
    [Show full text]
  • Johannes Kepler
    PORTRAIT I FAMOUS OPTICIAN Johannes Kepler The German mathematician and astronomer MAIN DATES Johannes Kepler is above all famous for discovering the eponymous laws governing planetary motion. Born 27 December 1571, Weil der Stadt (Germany) Combining Tycho Brahe’s meticulous observations 1601 Mathematicus imperialis, Prague and his own theoretical predictions, his astronomical 1609 First two Kepler laws tables were some of the most enduringly accurate 1611 Dioptricae publication ever established. They provided a firm footing for 1619 The Harmony of the World's third law Copernican theory in the face of the then universally Deceased 15 November 1630, Regensburg (Germany) acknowledged model of a geocentric universe. Despite A portrait of Johannes Kepler poor eyesight that prevented him from carrying out original experimental research, he became a major figure in the field of optics, overhauling all introduce him to the heliocentric theory put forward by its fundamental concepts and developing a sound Nicolaus Copernicus [1473-1543]. In a world dominated by mathematical approach that supported Galileo’s first the Church and the geocentric model devised by Claudius telescopic observations. Ptolemy [ca. AD 90 – ca. 168], which placed the Earth at the centre of the universe, this act was nothing short of unlaw- Riad HAIDAR, [email protected] ful. However, his teacher’s arguments were so compelling and the reasoning so seductive that Kepler soon became a convinced Copernican. As this new stance was obviously ohannes Kepler was born on 27 December 1571 to a incompatible with the role of a pastor, Kepler abandoned his family of modest means in the town of Weil der Stadt.
    [Show full text]
  • IRTF Spectra for 17 Asteroids from the C and X Complexes: a Discussion of Continuum Slopes and Their Relationships to C Chondrites and Phyllosilicates ⇑ Daniel R
    Icarus 212 (2011) 682–696 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus IRTF spectra for 17 asteroids from the C and X complexes: A discussion of continuum slopes and their relationships to C chondrites and phyllosilicates ⇑ Daniel R. Ostrowski a, Claud H.S. Lacy a,b, Katherine M. Gietzen a, Derek W.G. Sears a,c, a Arkansas Center for Space and Planetary Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States b Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States c Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States article info abstract Article history: In order to gain further insight into their surface compositions and relationships with meteorites, we Received 23 April 2009 have obtained spectra for 17 C and X complex asteroids using NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility and SpeX Revised 20 January 2011 infrared spectrometer. We augment these spectra with data in the visible region taken from the on-line Accepted 25 January 2011 databases. Only one of the 17 asteroids showed the three features usually associated with water, the UV Available online 1 February 2011 slope, a 0.7 lm feature and a 3 lm feature, while five show no evidence for water and 11 had one or two of these features. According to DeMeo et al. (2009), whose asteroid classification scheme we use here, 88% Keywords: of the variance in asteroid spectra is explained by continuum slope so that asteroids can also be charac- Asteroids, composition terized by the slopes of their continua.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Ratio
    IOSR Journal Of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 12, Issue 2 Ser. II (Mar. – Apr. 2020), PP 36-57 www.Iosrjournals.Org The Golden Ratio Nafish Sarwar Islam Abstract:This paper is all about golden ratio Phi = 1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286213544862270526046281890 244970720720418939113748475408807538689175212663386222353693179318006076672635 443338908659593958290563832266131992829026788067520876689250171169620703222104 321626954862629631361443814975870122034080588795445474924618569536486444924104 432077134494704956584678850987433944221254487706647809158846074998871240076521 705751797883416625624940758906970400028121042762177111777805315317141011704666 599146697987317613560067087480710131795236894275219484353056783002287856997829 778347845878228911097625003026961561700250464338243776486102838312683303724292 675263116533924731671112115881863851331620384005222165791286675294654906811317 159934323597349498509040947621322298101726107059611645629909816290555208524790 352406020172799747175342777592778625619432082750513121815628551222480939471234 145170223735805772786160086883829523045926478780178899219902707769038953219681 986151437803149974110692608867429622675756052317277752035361393621076738937645 560606059216589466759551900400555908950229530942312482355212212415444006470340 565734797663972394949946584578873039623090375033993856210242369025138680414577 995698122445747178034173126453220416397232134044449487302315417676893752103068 737880344170093954409627955898678723209512426893557309704509595684401755519881
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo, Ignoramus: Mathematics Versus Philosophy in the Scientific Revolution
    Galileo, Ignoramus: Mathematics versus Philosophy in the Scientific Revolution Viktor Blåsjö Abstract I offer a revisionist interpretation of Galileo’s role in the history of science. My overarching thesis is that Galileo lacked technical ability in mathematics, and that this can be seen as directly explaining numerous aspects of his life’s work. I suggest that it is precisely because he was bad at mathematics that Galileo was keen on experiment and empiricism, and eagerly adopted the telescope. His reliance on these hands-on modes of research was not a pioneering contribution to scientific method, but a last resort of a mind ill equipped to make a contribution on mathematical grounds. Likewise, it is precisely because he was bad at mathematics that Galileo expounded at length about basic principles of scientific method. “Those who can’t do, teach.” The vision of science articulated by Galileo was less original than is commonly assumed. It had long been taken for granted by mathematicians, who, however, did not stop to pontificate about such things in philosophical prose because they were too busy doing advanced scientific work. Contents 4 Astronomy 38 4.1 Adoption of Copernicanism . 38 1 Introduction 2 4.2 Pre-telescopic heliocentrism . 40 4.3 Tycho Brahe’s system . 42 2 Mathematics 2 4.4 Against Tycho . 45 2.1 Cycloid . .2 4.5 The telescope . 46 2.2 Mathematicians versus philosophers . .4 4.6 Optics . 48 2.3 Professor . .7 4.7 Mountains on the moon . 49 2.4 Sector . .8 4.8 Double-star parallax . 50 2.5 Book of nature .
    [Show full text]
  • Infrared Spectroscopy of Large, Low-Albedo Asteroids: Are Ceres and Themis Archetypes Or Outliers?
    Infrared Spectroscopy of Large, Low-Albedo Asteroids: Are Ceres and Themis Archetypes or Outliers? Andrew S. Rivkin1, Ellen S. Howell2, Joshua P. Emery3 1. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory 2. University of Arizona 3. University of Tennessee Corresponding author: Andrew Rivkin ([email protected]) Key points: • The largest low-albedo asteroids appear to be unrepresented in the meteorite collection • Reflectance spectra in the 3-µm spectral region, and presumably compositions, similar to Ceres and Themis appear to be common in low-albedo asteroids > 200 km diameter • The asteroid 324 Bamberga appears to have hemispherical-scale variation in its reflectance spectrum, and in places has a spectrum reminiscent of Comet 67P. Submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research 17 September 2018 Revised 27 February 2019 Accepted 12 April 2019 1 Abstract: Low-albedo, hydrated objects dominate the list of the largest asteroids. These objects have varied spectral shapes in the 3-µm region, where diagnostic absorptions due to volatile species are found. Dawn’s visit to Ceres has extended the view shaped by ground-based observing, and shown that world to be a complex one, potentially still experiencing geological activity. We present 33 observations from 2.2-4.0 µm of eight large (D > 200 km) asteroids from the C spectral complex, with spectra inconsistent with the hydrated minerals we see in meteorites. We characterize their absorption band characteristics via polynomial and Gaussian fits to test their spectral similarity to Ceres, the asteroid 24 Themis (thought to be covered in ice frost), and the asteroid 51 Nemausa (spectrally similar to the CM meteorites).
    [Show full text]