DOCSLIB.ORG

The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan Translating Solar and Heliospheric Physics Questions Into Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan Translating Solar and Heliospheric Physics Questions Into Action A&A 642, A3 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038445 & c ESO 2020 Astrophysics The Solar Orbiter mission Special issue The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan Translating solar and heliospheric physics questions into action I. Zouganelis1, A. De Groof1, A. P. Walsh1, D. R. Williams1, D. Müller2, O. C. St Cyr3, F. Auchère4, D. Berghmans5, A. Fludra6, T. S. Horbury7, R. A. Howard8, S. Krucker9, M. Maksimovic10, C. J. Owen11, J. Rodríguez-Pacheco12, M. Romoli13, S. K. Solanki14,15, C. Watson1, L. Sanchez1, J. Lefort1, P. Osuna1, H. R. Gilbert3, T. Nieves-Chinchilla3, L. Abbo16, O. Alexandrova10, A. Anastasiadis17, V. Andretta18, E. Antonucci16, T. Appourchaux4, A. Aran19, C. N. Arge3, G. Aulanier10, D. Baker11, S. D. Bale20, M. Battaglia9, L. Bellot Rubio21, A. Bemporad16, M. Berthomier22, K. Bocchialini4, X. Bonnin10, A. S. Brun23, R. Bruno24, E. Buchlin4, J. Büchner25, R. Bucik26,14, F. Carcaboso12, R. Carr1, I. Carrasco-Blázquez7, B. Cecconi10, I. Cernuda Cangas12, C. H. K. Chen27, L. P. Chitta14, T. Chust22, K. Dalmasse28, R. D’Amicis24, V. Da Deppo29, R. De Marco24, S. Dolei30, L. Dolla5, T. Dudok de Wit31, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi11, J. P. Eastwood7, F. Espinosa Lara12, L. Etesi9, A. Fedorov28, F. Félix-Redondo1, S. Fineschi16, B. Fleck32, D. Fontaine22, N. J. Fox33, A. Gandorfer14, V. Génot28, M. K. Georgoulis34,35, S. Gissot5, A. Giunta6, L. Gizon14, R. Gómez-Herrero12, C. Gontikakis34, G. Graham1, L. Green11, T. Grundy6, M. Haberreiter36, L. K. Harra36,37, D. M. Hassler38, J. Hirzberger14, G. C. Ho39, G. Hurford20, D. Innes14, K. Issautier10, A. W. James1, N. Janitzek1, M. Janvier4, N. Jeffrey40, J. Jenkins11,41, Y. Khotyaintsev42, K.-L. Klein10, E. P. Kontar43, I. Kontogiannis44, C. Krafft22, V. Krasnoselskikh31, M. Kretzschmar31, N. Labrosse43, A. Lagg14, F. Landini16, B. Lavraud28, I. Leon1, S. T. Lepri45, G. R. Lewis11, P. Liewer46, J. Linker47, S. Livi26, D. M. Long11, P. Louarn28, O. Malandraki17, S. Maloney48,49, V. Martinez-Pillet50, M. Martinovic51,10, A. Masson1, S. Matthews11, L. Matteini7, N. Meyer-Vernet10, K. Moraitis10,52, R. J. Morton40, S. Musset43, G. Nicolaou11, A. Nindos52, H. O’Brien7, D. Orozco Suarez21, M. Owens53, M. Pancrazzi54, A. Papaioannou17, S. Parenti4, E. Pariat10, S. Patsourakos52, D. Perrone55, H. Peter14, R. F. Pinto28,23, C. Plainaki55, D. Plettemeier56, S. P. Plunkett33, J. M. Raines45, N. Raouafi39, H. Reid11, A. Retino22, L. Rezeau22, P. Rochus57, L. Rodriguez5, L. Rodriguez-Garcia12, M. Roth58, A. P. Rouillard28, F. Sahraoui22, C. Sasso18, J. Schou14, U. Schühle14, L. Sorriso-Valvo59,60, J. Soucek61, D. Spadaro30, M. Stangalini55, D. Stansby11, M. Steller62, A. Strugarek23, Š. Štverák61,63, R. Susino16, D. Telloni16, C. Terasa64, L. Teriaca14, S. Toledo-Redondo65, J. C. del Toro Iniesta21, G. Tsiropoula17, A. Tsounis1, K. Tziotziou17, F. Valentini66, A. Vaivads67, A. Vecchio10,68, M. Velli46, C. Verbeeck5, A. Verdini13, D. Verscharen11,69, N. Vilmer10, A. Vourlidas39, R. Wicks40, R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber64, T. Wiegelmann14, P. R. Young3,40, and A. N. Zhukov5,70 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 19 May 2020 / Accepted 19 August 2020 ABSTRACT Solar Orbiter is the first space mission observing the solar plasma both in situ and remotely, from a close distance, in and out of the ecliptic. The ultimate goal is to understand how the Sun produces and controls the heliosphere, filling the Solar System and driving the planetary environments. With six remote-sensing and four in-situ instrument suites, the coordination and planning of the operations are essential to address the following four top-level science questions: (1) What drives the solar wind and where does the coronal magnetic field originate?; (2) How do solar transients drive heliospheric variability?; (3) How do solar eruptions produce energetic particle radiation that fills the heliosphere?; (4) How does the solar dynamo work and drive connections between the Sun and the heliosphere? Maximising the mission’s science return requires considering the characteristics of each orbit, including the relative position of the spacecraft to Earth (affecting downlink rates), trajectory events (such as gravitational assist manoeuvres), and the phase of the solar activity cycle. Furthermore, since each orbit’s science telemetry will be downloaded over the course of the following orbit, science operations must be planned at mission level, rather than at the level of individual orbits. It is important to explore the way in which those science questions are translated into an actual plan of observations that fits into the mission, thus ensuring that no opportunities are missed. First, the overarching goals are broken down into specific, answerable questions along with the required observations and the so-called Science Activity Plan (SAP) is developed to achieve this. The SAP groups objectives that require similar observations into Solar Orbiter Observing Plans, resulting in a strategic, top-level view of the optimal opportunities for science observations during the mission lifetime. This allows for all four mission goals to be addressed. In this paper, we introduce Solar Orbiter’s SAP through a series of examples and the strategy being followed. Key words. space vehicles: instruments – methods: observational – Sun: general Article published by EDP Sciences A3, page 1 of 19 A&A 642, A3 (2020) 1. Introduction STEREO (Kaiser et al. 2008), SDO (Pesnell et al. 2012) and IRIS (De Pontieu et al. 2014) as well as from ground-based observato- Coordination and planning will be the key to the scientific suc- ries such as Gregor (Schmidt et al. 2012), GST (Cao et al. 2010), cess of Solar Orbiter, the new solar and heliospheric mission NVST (Liu et al. 2014), SST (Scharmer et al. 2003) and ALMA of the European Space Agency (ESA) with strong NASA par- (Shimojo et al. 2017; White et al. 2017) have resulted in a leap ticipation, which was launched in February 2020 (Müller et al. forward in our understanding of the Sun and heliosphere, and 2020). This need for planning originates from the science goals have proven that critical progress in understanding the physics of the mission, the capabilities of the platform and the payload, requires a synergy of remote and in-situ observations. together with the telemetry constraints due to the deep-space Solar Orbiter builds on previous missions and lessons characteristics of the orbit, and this has driven the design of learned to be able to address the central question of heliophysics: the operations concept. To maximise the science return, obser- “how does the Sun create and control the heliosphere and why vations must be coordinated between the remote-sensing and does solar activity change with time?” This, in turn, is a fun- in-situ payload, amongst the remote-sensing instruments them- damental part of the second science question of ESA’s Cos- selves (Auchère et al. 2020), and also amongst the in-situ instru- mic Vision programme: “How does the solar system work?”. ments (Walsh et al. 2020). The science return of Solar Orbiter Solar Orbiter is specifically designed to identify the origins and and other contemporary space missions, particularly the Parker causes of the solar wind, the heliospheric magnetic field, solar Solar Probe (Fox et al. 2016) and BepiColombo (Benkhoff et al. energetic particles, transient interplanetary disturbances, and the 2010), and ground-based facilities such as the Daniel K. Inouye Sun’s magnetic field itself. Solar Telescope DKIST (e.g. Tritschler et al. 2016) or the Square The supersonic solar wind, driven by dynamic plasma and Kilometer Array (Nindos et al. 2019) will also be enhanced magnetic processes near the Sun’s surface, expands to surround through cross-facility coordination, within the constraints under the solar system’s planets and the space far beyond. In the solar which each facility operates (Velli et al. 2020). interior, the solar dynamo drives magnetic fields whose buoy- The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan (SAP) has been built ancy brings them to the surface where they form huge arcades of with contributions from a significant portion of the international loops, which store enormous amounts of magnetic energy. These solar physics and heliophysics community. In a structured way, magnetic loops are stretched and sheared by the Sun’s differen- it describes the activities that are to be carried out by the instru- tial rotation and transient surface processes, sometimes erupt- ments throughout all science mission phases in order to fulfil ing in bright explosions, which eject magnetic structures and the science goals of the mission. It tracks how overarching sci- accelerate energetic particles that propagate into the solar sys- ence goals are mapped to more specific objectives, which are tem, occasionally impacting Earth and its magnetic shield with in turn mapped to observational activities scheduled at specific disruptive effects on space and terrestrial systems. Understand- times during the mission. As context information, it also contains ing the complex physical processes at work in this system is the instruments’ operation scenarios and resource modelling, along central goal of heliophysics. Since the Sun and the heliosphere with a description of all mission phases. One of the main reasons are typical of many late-type main-sequence stars and their astro- for mission level planning is to ensure that there will be enough spheres, these studies are relevant to astrophysics, but are unique opportunities to address all of the mission’s science objectives in since the Sun alone is close enough for detailed study. an optimal way and that transferring an optimal amount of data Although Earth’s vantage point at 1 au is close by astrophys- to ground will be possible. More importantly, we need to make ical measures, it has long been known that much of the crucial sure that if, for example, a unique opportunity exists for a spe- physics in the formation and activity of the heliosphere takes cific science goal at a given date or configuration, this goal will place much closer to the Sun, and that by the time magnetic be given higher priority.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fundamentals of Impulsive Energy Release in the Corona Heliophysics 2050 Workshop White Paper A
    Heliophysics 2050 White Papers (2021) 4093.pdf Fundamentals of impulsive energy release in the corona Heliophysics 2050 Workshop white paper A. Y. Shih (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center), L. Glesener (UMN), S. Krucker (UCB), S. Guidoni (Amer. Univ.), S. Christe (GSFC), K. Reeves (SAO), S. Gburek (PAS), A. Caspi (SwRI), M. Alaoui (GSFC/CUA), J. Allred (GSFC), M. Battaglia (FHNW), W. Baumgartner (MSFC), B. Dennis (GSFC), J. Drake (UMD), K. Goetz (UMN), L. Golub (SAO), I. Hannah (Univ. of Glasgow), L. Hayes (GSFC/USRA), G. Holman (GSFC/Emeritus), A. Inglis (GSFC/CUA), J. Ireland (GSFC), G. Kerr (GSFC/CUA), J. Klimchuk (GSFC), D. McKenzie (MSFC), C. Moore (SAO), S. Musset (Univ. of Glasgow), J. Reep (NRL), D. Ryan (GSFC/AU), P. Saint-Hilaire (UCB), S. Savage (MSFC), R. Schwartz (GSFC/AU), D. Seaton (NOAA), M. Stęślicki (PAS), T. Woods (LASP) Introduction Solar eruptive events are the most energetic and geo-effective space-weather drivers. They originate in the corona near the Sun’s surface as a combination of solar flares (impulsive bursts of radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum) and coronal mass ejections (CMEs; expulsions of magnetized plasma into interplanetary space). The radiation and energetic particles they produce can damage satellites, disrupt telecommunications and GPS navigation, and endanger astronauts in space. Many of the processes involved in triggering, driving, and sustaining solar eruptive events–including magnetic reconnection, particle acceleration, plasma heating, and energy transport in magnetized plasmas–also play important roles in phenomena throughout the Universe, such as in magnetospheric substorms, gamma-ray bursts, and accretion disks. The Sun is a unique laboratory to better understand these fundamental physical processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Thrust Manoeuvres to Perform Large Changes of RAAN Or Inclination in LEO
    Facoltà di Ingegneria Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Aerospaziale Master Thesis Low Thrust Manoeuvres To Perform Large Changes of RAAN or Inclination in LEO Academic Tutor: Prof. Lorenzo CASALINO Candidate: Filippo GRISOT July 2018 “It is possible for ordinary people to choose to be extraordinary” E. Musk ii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis iii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis Acknowledgments I would like to address my sincere acknowledgments to my professor Lorenzo Casalino, for your huge help in these moths, for your willingness, for your professionalism and for your kindness. It was very stimulating, as well as fun, working with you. I would like to thank all my course-mates, for the time spent together inside and outside the “Poli”, for the help in passing the exams, for the fun and the desperation we shared throughout these years. I would like to especially express my gratitude to Emanuele, Gianluca, Giulia, Lorenzo and Fabio who, more than everyone, had to bear with me. I would like to also thank all my extra-Poli friends, especially Alberto, for your support and the long talks throughout these years, Zach, for being so close although the great distance between us, Bea’s family, for all the Sundays and summers spent together, and my soccer team Belfiga FC, for being the crazy lovable people you are. A huge acknowledgment needs to be address to my family: to my grandfather Luciano, for being a great friend; to my grandmother Bianca, for teaching me what “fighting” means; to my grandparents Beppe and Etta, for protecting me
    [Show full text]
  • Observing from Space Orbits, Constraints, Planning, Coordination
    Observing from Space Orbits, constraints, planning, coordination Integral XMM-Newton Jan-Uwe Ness European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) Villafranca del Castillo, Spain On behalf of the Integral and XMM-Newton Science Operations Centres Slide 1 Observing from Space - Orbits http://sci.esa.int/integral/59688-integral-fifteen-years-in-orbit/ Slide 2 Observing from Space - Orbits Highly elliptical Earth orbit: XMM-Newton, Integral, Chandra Slide 3 Observing from Space - Orbits Low-Earth orbit: ~1.5 hour, examples: Hubble Space Telescope Swift NuSTAR Fermi Earth blocking, especially low declination objects Only short snapshots of a few 100s possible No long uninterrupted observations Only partial overlap with Integral/XMM possible Slide 4 Observing from Space - Orbits Orbit around Lagrange point L2 past: future: Herschel James Webb Planck Athena present: Gaia Slide 5 Observing from Space – Constraints Motivations for constraints: • Safety of space-craft and instruments • Contamination by bright optical/X-ray sources or straylight from them • Functionality of star Tracker • Power supply (solar panels) • Thermal stability (avoid heat from the sun) • Ground contact for remote commanding and downlink of data Space-specific constraints in bold orange Slide 6 Observing from Space – Constraints Examples for constraints: • No observations while passing through radiation belts • Orientation of space craft to sun • Large avoidance angles around Sun and anti-Sun, Moon, Earth, Bright planets • No slewing over Moon and Earth (planets ok) • Availability
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Missions AO Analysis
    ESA Announcements of Opportunity Outcome Analysis Arvind Parmar Head, Science Support Office ESA Directorate of Science With thanks to Kate Isaak, Erik Kuulkers, Göran Pilbratt and Norbert Schartel (Project Scientists) ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use The ESA Fleet for Astrophysics ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 2 ESA Announcement of Observing Opportunities Ø Observing time AOs are normally only used for ESA’s observatory missions – the targets/observing strategies for the other missions are generally the responsibility of the Science Teams. Ø ESA does not provide funding to successful proposers. Ø Results for ESA-led missions with recent AOs presented: • XMM-Newton • INTEGRAL • Herschel Ø Gender information was not requested in the AOs. It has been ”manually” derived by the project scientists and SOC staff. ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 3 XMM-Newton – ESA’s Large X-ray Observatory ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 4 XMM-Newton Ø ESA’s second X-ray observatory. Launched in 1999 with annual calls for observing proposals. Operational. Ø Typically 500 proposals per XMM-Newton Call with an over-subscription in observing time of 5-7. Total of 9233 proposals. Ø The TAC typically consists of 70 scientists divided into 13 panels with an overall TAC chair. Ø Output is >6000 refereed papers in total, >300 per year ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Science Timeline Final Wnasa ID
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Solar LAUNCH Windand A mission to travel directly through the Sun’s corona, providing up-close observations on what heats the solar atmosphere and accelerates CoronaTimeline the solar wind. Slow Solar Wind and Helmet Streamers Using observations from the joint ESA/NASA Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, Neil R. Sheeley Jr. and colleagues identify puffs of slow solar wind emanating from helmet streamers — bright areas of the corona that form above magnetically active regions on the photosphere. Exactly how these puffs are formed is still not known. The Sun’s Poles Ulysses, a joint NASA-ESA mission, becomes the first mission to fly over the Sun’s north and south poles. Among other findings, Ulysses found that in periods of minimal solar activity, the fast solar wind comes from the poles, while the slow solar wind comes from equatorial regions. Nanoflares May Heat the Corona 2018 Eugene Parker proposes that frequent, small eruptions on the Sun — known as nanoflares — may heat the corona to its extreme temperatures. The nanoflare 1995 theory contrasts with the wave theory, in which heating is caused by the dissipation of Alfvén waves. 1990 Fast Wind from Coronal Holes Images from Skylab, the U.S.’s first manned space station, identify that the fast solar wind is emitted from coronal holes — comparatively cool regions of the corona where the Sun’s magnetic field lines open out into space. 1988 The Slow and Fast Solar Wind NASA’s Mariner 2 spacecraft observes the solar wind, 1973 detecting two distinct ‘streams’ within it: a slow stream travelling at approximately 215 miles per second, and a fast stream at 430 miles per second.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.00776V1 [Physics.Space-Ph] 1 Jun 2020
    manuscript submitted to Geophysical Research Letters Dust impact voltage signatures on Parker Solar Probe: influence of spacecraft floating potential S. D. Bale1,2, K. Goetz3, J. W. Bonnell1, A. W. Case4, C. H. K. Chen5,T. Dudok de Wit6, L. C. Gasque1,2, P. R. Harvey1, J. C. Kasper 7,4, P. J. Kellogg3, R. J. MacDowall8, M. Maksimovic9, D. M. Malaspina10, B. F. Page1,2, M. Pulupa1, M. L. Stevens4, J. R. Szalay11, A. Zaslavsky9 1Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450, USA 2Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA 4Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 5School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK 6LPC2E, CNRS and University of Orleans,´ Orleans,´ France 7Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 8Solar System Exploration Division, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771 9LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Universit PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit, Universit de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France 10Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA 11Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA Key Points: • The Parker Solar Probe (PSP) FIELDS instrument measures millisecond volt- ages impulses associated with dust impacts • The sign of the largest monopole voltage response is a function of the spacecraft floating potential • These measurements are consistent with models of dynamic charge balance following dust impacts Submitted : June 2, 2020 arXiv:2006.00776v1 [physics.space-ph] 1 Jun 2020 Corresponding author: Stuart D.
    [Show full text]
  • Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (Stray-Light Baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017
    Mindrum.com Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (stray-light baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017 1 Overview Mindrum.com Precollimator •Past •Present •Future 2 Past Mindrum.com • Space X-Ray Telescopes (XRT) • Basic Structure • Effectiveness • Past Construction 3 Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton 1999 • Chandra 1999 • HETE-2 2000-07 • INTEGRAL 2002 4 ESA/NASA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Swift 2004 • Suzaku 2005-2015 • AGILE 2007 • NuSTAR 2012 5 NASA/JPL/ASI/JAXA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Astrosat 2015 • Hitomi (ASTRO-H) 2016-2016 • NICER (ISS) 2017 • HXMT/Insight 慧眼 2017 6 NASA/JPL/CNSA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com NASA/JPL-Caltech Harrison, F.A. et al. (2013; ApJ, 770, 103) 7 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com Grazing Incidence 8 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: NuSTAR Mirrors Mindrum.com 9 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM Newton XRT 10 ESA Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton mirrors D. de Chambure, XMM Project (ESTEC)/ESA 11 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • Thermal Precollimator on ROSAT 12 http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/ Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • AGILE Precollimator 13 http://agile.asdc.asi.it Basic Structure Mindrum.com • Spektr-RG 2018 14 MPE Basic Structure: Stray X-Rays Mindrum.com 15 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: Grazing Mindrum.com 16 NASA X-Ray Effectiveness: Straylight Mindrum.com • Correct Reflection • Secondary Only • Backside Reflection • Primary Only 17 X-Ray Effectiveness Mindrum.com • The Crab Nebula by: ROSAT (1990) Chandra 18 S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Learning Framework for Solar Phenomena Prediction
    FlareNet: A Deep Learning Framework for Solar Phenomena Prediction FDL 2017 Solar Storm Team: Sean McGregor1, Dattaraj Dhuri1,2, Anamaria Berea1,3, and Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo1,4 1NASA’s 2017 Frontier Development Laboratory 2Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai, India 3Center for Complexity in Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 4SouthWest Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA Abstract Solar activity can interfere with the normal operation of GPS satellites, the power grid, and space operations, but inadequate predictive models mean we have little warning for the arrival of newly disruptive solar activity. Petabytes of data col- lected from satellite instruments aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) provide a high-cadence, high-resolution, and many-channeled dataset of solar phenomena. Several challenging deep learning problems may be derived from the data, including space weather forecasting (i.e., solar flares, solar energetic particles, and coronal mass ejections). This work introduces a software framework, FlareNet, for experimentation within these problems. FlareNet includes compo- nents for the downloading and management of SDO data, visualization, and rapid experimentation. The system architecture is built to enable collaboration between heliophysicists and machine learning researchers on the topics of image regres- sion, image classification, and image segmentation. We specifically highlight the problem of solar flare prediction and offer insights from preliminary experiments. 1 Introduction The violent release of solar magnetic energy – collectively referred to as “space weather" – is responsible for a variety of phenomena that can disrupt technological assets. In particular, solar flares (sudden brightenings of the solar corona) and coronal mass ejections (CMEs; the violent release of solar plasma) can disrupt long-distance communications, reduce Global Positioning System (GPS) accuracy, degrade satellites, and disrupt the power grid [5].
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROPER TREATMENT of CORONAL MASS EJECTION BRIGHTNESS: a NEW METHODOLOGY and IMPLICATIONS for OBSERVATIONS Angelos Vourlidas and Russell A
    The Astrophysical Journal, 642:1216–1221, 2006 May 10 A # 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE PROPER TREATMENT OF CORONAL MASS EJECTION BRIGHTNESS: A NEW METHODOLOGY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR OBSERVATIONS Angelos Vourlidas and Russell A. Howard Code 7663, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375; [email protected] Received 2005 November 10; accepted 2005 December 30 ABSTRACT With the complement of coronagraphs and imagers in the SECCHI suite, we will follow a coronal mass ejection (CME) continuously from the Sun to Earth for the first time. The comparison, however, of the CME emission among the various instruments is not as easy as one might think. This is because the telescopes record the Thomson-scattered emission from the CME plasma, which has a rather sensitive dependence on the geometry between the observer and the scattering material. Here we describe the proper treatment of the Thomson-scattered emission, compare the CME brightness over a large range of elongation angles, and discuss the implications for existing and future white-light coronagraph observations. Subject headinggs: scattering — Sun: corona — Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Online material: color figures 1. INTRODUCTION some important implications resulting from dropping this as- It is long been established that white-light emission of the co- sumption. We conclude in x 4. rona originates by Thomson scattering of the photospheric light by coronal electrons (e.g., Minnaert 1930). Coronal mass ejec- 2. THOMSON SCATTERING GEOMETRY tions (CMEs) comprise a spectacular example of this process and The theory behind Thomson scattering is well understood are regularly recorded by ground-based and space-based corona- (Jackson 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Bepicolombo - a Mission to Mercury
    BEPICOLOMBO - A MISSION TO MERCURY ∗ R. Jehn , J. Schoenmaekers, D. Garc´ıa and P. Ferri European Space Operations Centre, ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT BepiColombo is a cornerstone mission of the ESA Science Programme, to be launched towards Mercury in July 2014. After a journey of nearly 6 years two probes, the Magneto- spheric Orbiter (JAXA) and the Planetary Orbiter (ESA) will be separated and injected into their target orbits. The interplanetary trajectory includes flybys at the Earth, Venus (twice) and Mercury (four times), as well as several thrust arcs provided by the solar electric propulsion module. At the end of the transfer a gravitational capture at the weak stability boundary is performed exploiting the Sun gravity. In case of a failure of the orbit insertion burn, the spacecraft will stay for a few revolutions in the weakly captured orbit. The arrival conditions are chosen such that backup orbit insertion manoeuvres can be performed one, four or five orbits later with trajectory correction manoeuvres of less than 15 m/s to compensate the Sun perturbations. Only in case that no manoeuvre can be performed within 64 days (5 orbits) after the nominal orbit insertion the spacecraft will leave Mercury and the mission will be lost. The baseline trajectory has been designed taking into account all operational constraints: 90-day commissioning phase without any thrust; 30-day coast arcs before each flyby (to allow for precise navigation); 7-day coast arcs after each flyby; 60-day coast arc before orbit insertion; Solar aspect angle constraints and minimum flyby altitudes (300 km at Earth and Venus, 200 km at Mercury).
    [Show full text]
  • Solar and Space Physics: a Science for a Technological Society
    Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society The 2013-2022 Decadal Survey in Solar and Space Physics Space Studies Board ∙ Division on Engineering & Physical Sciences ∙ August 2012 From the interior of the Sun, to the upper atmosphere and near-space environment of Earth, and outwards to a region far beyond Pluto where the Sun’s influence wanes, advances during the past decade in space physics and solar physics have yielded spectacular insights into the phenomena that affect our home in space. This report, the final product of a study requested by NASA and the National Science Foundation, presents a prioritized program of basic and applied research for 2013-2022 that will advance scientific understanding of the Sun, Sun- Earth connections and the origins of “space weather,” and the Sun’s interactions with other bodies in the solar system. The report includes recommendations directed for action by the study sponsors and by other federal agencies—especially NOAA, which is responsible for the day-to-day (“operational”) forecast of space weather. Recent Progress: Significant Advances significant progress in understanding the origin from the Past Decade and evolution of the solar wind; striking advances The disciplines of solar and space physics have made in understanding of both explosive solar flares remarkable advances over the last decade—many and the coronal mass ejections that drive space of which have come from the implementation weather; new imaging methods that permit direct of the program recommended in 2003 Solar observations of the space weather-driven changes and Space Physics Decadal Survey. For example, in the particles and magnetic fields surrounding enabled by advances in scientific understanding Earth; new understanding of the ways that space as well as fruitful interagency partnerships, the storms are fueled by oxygen originating from capabilities of models that predict space weather Earth’s own atmosphere; and the surprising impacts on Earth have made rapid gains over discovery that conditions in near-Earth space the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Test Campaign of the Solar Orbiter STM
    46th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2016-236 10-14 July 2016, Vienna, Austria Thermal Test Campaign of the Solar Orbiter STM C. Damasio1 European Space Agency, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk ZH, 2201 AZ, The Netherlands A. Jacobs2, S. Morgan3, M. Sprague4, D. Wild5, Airbus Defence & Space Limited,Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, SG1 2AS, UK and V. Luengo6 RHEA System S.A., Av. Pasteur 23, B-1300 Wavre, Belgium Solar Orbiter is the next solar-heliospheric mission in the ESA Science Directorate. The mission will provide the next major step forward in the exploration of the Sun and the heliosphere investigating many of the fundamental problems in solar and heliospheric science. One of the main design drivers for Solar Orbiter is the thermal environment, determined by a total irradiance of 13 solar constants (17500 W/m2) due to the proximity with the Sun. The spacecraft is normally in sun-pointing attitude and is protected from severe solar energy by the Heat Shield. The Heat Shield was tested separately at subsystem level. To complete the STM thermal verification, it was decided to subject to Solar orbiter platform without heat shield to thermal balance test that was performed at IABG test facility in November- December 2015 This paper will describe the Thermal Balance Test performed on the Solar Orbiter STM and the activities performed to correlate the thermal model and to show the verification of the STM thermal design. Nomenclature AU = Astronomical Unit CE = Cold Element FM = Flight Model HE = Hot Element IABG = Industrieanlagen
    [Show full text]