Welcome 2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017 The Power of Connection

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

Simon S. Whitelocke Vice President, ITC Holdings Corp., and President, ITC Connecting to Our Heritage

INCEPTION Two Operating Companies TODAY • ITCTransmission - 2003 • Michigan Electric Transmission Company - 2006 Statistics • Transmission Lines: 8,700 circuit miles • Transmission Towers and Poles: 55,600 • Substations: 283 • Voltage Levels: 120kV to 345kV • Capital Investment: ~$3.5B to date • Headquarters: Novi, Michigan Improving System Reliability

Modernizing and Maintaining the Transmission Grid Interconnecting Generation

2,147 MW of Connected Generation in Michigan Since 2003

Coal/Nuclear 10%

Renewables Natural Gas Gas 32% Renewables Coal/Nuclear 61% ITC Today

$6.5B Invested In Infrastructure Since 2003 • 4 Subsidiaries in 8 states • 15,800 Circuit miles • 90,000 Square mile service territory • 600+ Employees • Member of 4 RTOs: – MISO, SPP, PJM, NYISO • Geographically flexible business model • A Fortis company A Fortis Company

• Fortis Inc. acquired ITC in 2016 • Leader in the North American regulated electric and gas utility industry • Operations in five Canadian provinces, nine U.S. states and three Caribbean countries • Established 1885 in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador with formation of the St. John’s Electric Company Our Commitment Since Inception

Deliver customer benefits:

• Improve and maintain system reliability • Reduce system congestion • Expand access to competitive energy markets • Facilitate interconnection of new generation • Lower overall cost of delivered energy Michigan Economy Michigan Economy

Michigan Real GDP Forecast 450

430 RGDP 50th Percentile 410 Forecast

390 Stronger Near-Term Rebound 370 Slower Near-term Recovery 350 Moderate Recession 330

310 Stagflation

290

Real GDP (Bil. Chained 2009 $, SAAR) $, 2009 Chained (Bil. GDP Real

2016 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 2017 2018 2020 2021 2022 2005 Source: BEA; BLS; Moody's Analytics ITC Strategy

Build the transmission grid of the future in North America

Significant need for transmission infrastructure • Interregional (tie regions together) and within regions • Robust “regulated” grid with appropriate “contracted” lines

• Accommodates increase of renewable generation Canada • Most efficiently matches generation sources to load United States • Increases security, reliability, and resiliency of electric grid • Enhances affordability of electricity to consumers Mexico • Assessment of storage solutions to support transmission infrastructure Flexible, Accessible Grid Needed

New Demands and Uses: Modern, interconnected grid needed to support 21st Century technology and policy developments: • Distributed generation • Demand response • Efficiency programs • Electric vehicles • Renewable energy mandates Consumer Awareness

Consumers are growing more conscious of energy issues and are gaining influence over the source, cost and use of energy in their daily lives.

Customer Trends Desire for higher reliability Increasing need for high-quality, uninterrupted power in homes and businesses Increasing environmental awareness Public concern for the environmental impacts of energy generation is rising

* Polling results from survey conducted online by Research Now, an independent opinion research company, with a nationally representative audience of 800 U.S. adults age 18+. The precision of online polls is calculated using a credibility interval, with a poll of 800 accurate to roughly +/- 4 percentage points. *Quotation from blinded interviews with senior-level officials engaged in energy- related decisions at their organizations conducted by an independent interviewer. Underinvestment

American Society Civil Engineers 2017 Infrastructure Report Card

Economic Impacts of Failing to Invest in the Grid

2016-2025 2026-2040 Business Sales $1.4 trillion $2 trillion GDP $816 billion $1.1 trillion Jobs 102K fewer by 2025 242K fewer by 2040 2016-2025 2016-2040 Investment Gap $177 billion $565 billion Among all infrastructure, electricity has the second largest total funding need and the largest funding shortfall. - American Society of Civil Engineers All totals in constant 2015 value, other than jobs. Modern Grid Investment

Source: EEI - Transmission Projects At a Glance, Dec. 2016 Value of Transmission

• Generation production cost savings • Reliability and resource adequacy benefits • Generation capacity cost savings • Market benefits • Environmental benefits • Public policy benefits • Employment and economic development

-- Brattle Group/WIRES study, 2013 INSIDE AN ELECTRIC BILL ITC Outlook

Vision of the Future Grid • Changes on supply and demand sides; grid may look same, but used differently • Have older equipment, mixed with new technologies • Will incorporate newer forms of generation, more intermittent and varied; more storage • Can provide greater access to markets, price efficiencies • Should have appropriate mix of AC infrastructure, with DC where it makes sense • Should have more energy storage for capability • Should be reliable, resilient, flexible, efficient and secure Needs Drivers • Connecting consumers to renewables (unlocking renewables) • Connecting consumers to energy markets • Reducing congestion • Reliability, resiliency and security improvements Our Partners in Business

ITC’s focus on transmission and grid development drives operational excellence and delivers superior value for customers, communities and other stakeholders. Next Up: • American Center for Mobility • ITC Business Updates • Networking • But first…a video! Laurel Champion Chief Operating Officer American Center for Mobility Break Grid Resiliency

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

Pedro Melendez Director, Asset Protection and Performance Agenda

• Risk landscape • Planning and preparedness • Responding to a risk / emergency • Industry organization and participation • Drill and assess Event Risk Categories

NATURAL MAN-MADE (with intent) An event that is caused by An event caused directly and nature or natural processes of principally by one or more the earth (e.g. flooding, tornado, ice storm) identifiable deliberate human actions (e.g. bomb-threat, cyber attack, active shooter, riots)

OPERATIONAL REPUTATION An event that may affect An event that could negatively business continuity and/or impact perspectives of operations including employees, stakeholders, facility/physical/technology general public, or media (e.g. infrastructure functions, supply insider trading, executive chain, logistics and workforce inappropriate activity, regulatory (e.g. electric system blackout, violations) computer failure, pandemic) National Guidelines

• Allows for adoption of new approaches that will enable continuous refinement • Improves integration and connectivity among jurisdictions and disciplines • Fosters cohesion among various response organizations

• A guide on how the nation conducts all-hazards response • Builds upon the National Incident Management System (NIMS) coordinating structures to align key roles and responsibilities • Links all levels of government, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector Incident Command System (ICS)

• Standardized, on-scene, all-hazards incident management concept • Enables a coordinated response among various jurisdictions and agencies • Establishes common processes for planning and management of resources • Allows for integration with a common organizational structure • Can be used to manage natural, operational, human-caused or unplanned events. Public – Private Sector Coordination

• ITC has implemented the use of NIMS and ICS to manage all incidents • Use of NIMS and ICS allows ITC to better coordinate with government, non-governmental organizations, and private organizations during large-scale events Emergency Plans and Facilities

Emergency Action Plans • Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery • Cyber and Physical Security • Emergency Operations • Pandemic Incident Facilities • Emergency Operations Center • Security Command Center • Cyber Security Operations Center • Joint Information Center ‘Typical’ System Problems Storm Damage • Thunder and lightning • Wind • Flooding • Heavy snow and ice Physical Damage • Vehicle accidents • Tractors • Airplanes Miscellaneous • Animal interference • Flying debris ‘Typical’ System Restoration

Basic system restoration steps • System reconfiguration (Reroute power through unaffected circuits) • Assess damage • Build work packages • Get parts and equipment • Isolate and repair • Return to normal service ‘New Normal’ Problems

Everything ‘Typical’ plus: Cyber intrusions Remote control vehicles Terrorist attacks ??? Physical Attack (‘New Normal’ Event)

Pacific Gas & Electric - Metcalf Substation • Six underground fiber optic lines cut • 17 Transformers, 6 circuit breakers, 44 radiators damaged • 52,000 gallons of oil spilled • Estimated $30M in damage • Less than one hour in the middle of the night • Attackers had knowledge of layout and locations of equipment Cyber and Physical Security

Asset theft and public safety are no longer the primary issues. Now, we must prepare for forced entry, explosives, ballistic attacks, control system hacking, sabotage… The ‘new normal’ issues must be addressed through enhanced cyber and physical security: • Additional monitoring • Physical obstacles to substation access • Improved cyber security and monitoring • Exercises to test systems and responses Industry and government partnerships are critical to managing the potential security and cyber security issues of the future. System Restoration – The ‘New Normal’ Way

The ‘Old Normal’ Restoration PLUS:

• Expanded company event reviews • Law enforcement assistance and investigation • Physical and/or cyber security reviews, analyses and upgrades • North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), Department of Energy (DOE) event reviews • Federal agency review and assistance What’s Next and How Do We Manage It? Response Tasks

Assess the Situation • Impact on the delivery of electricity to consumers • Intelligence information needed by the industry to respond and recover Communicate with the Public • Provide the public with meaningful information so they are aware of the situation and what is being done • Utilities and government at all levels, local, state/provincial, and federal, will need to communicate Unity of Effort • Form partnerships during “blue sky” days to cover the “new” scenarios • A more effective, efficient emergency response can be achieved Resolve Facility Restoration efforts • Industry must coordinate with government to identify and assess facility and lifeline restoration needs • Electric system recovery and restoration could be delayed until the nature of incidents are understood and mitigation strategies are available Resolve Physical Risks to Personnel • Local law enforcement and utility workers must be able to determine and avoid electrical hazards and physical threats before assessing and repairing electrical damages Electricity Sector Mutual Assistance

ITC is a member of two Mutual Assistance groups:

• Great Lakes Mutual Assistance Group (ITC Michigan) • 14 operating companies • Midwest Mutual Assistance Group (ITC Midwest) • 35 operating companies North Dakota South Dakota Minnesota GLMA Wisconsin Michigan MMA Nebraska Iowa Illinois States Illinois Indiana States Wisconsin Colorado Kansas Ohio Pennsylvania New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Kentucky West Virginia Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Virginia Tennessee Mississippi Michigan Indiana Kentucky Tennessee Ohio West Virginia South Carolina Virginia GridEx IV Nationwide and State Exercises

Led by NERC’s Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center (E-ISAC) • Largest cyber and physical security exercise of its kind • Simulated cyber and physical attacks affecting the grid • Two-day distributed play exercise and a separate executive tabletop on the second day Past Participants • More than 4,400 individuals from 364 organizations across North America • Industry, law enforcement and government agencies FBI Virtual Command Center • Used to aggregate and disseminate actionable, tactical information • Displayed at Exercise Control and viewed by FBI players at participating FBI field offices across the United States Conclusion

Know the Plan partnerships Drill & with risk prepare Government • assess Communities • Utilities landscape Respond • Other stakeholders System Performance

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

Vinit Gupta Director, Operations Engineering Measuring Performance

• ITC participates in annual transmission reliability benchmarking studies conducted by independent third-party companies or industry groups.

• Studies provide a measure for good performance and insight into areas of improvement.

• ITCTransmission (ITCT) and Michigan Electric Transmission Company (METC) continued to perform at a high level and maintained top decile or top quartile performance. Sustained Outages per Circuit, 2016

Number of Sustained Outages per Circuit, All Voltages, Excludes External, 2016

0.30 In this study a

0.25 total of 11 U.S.

0.20 companies 0.15 with 30% of 0.10 U.S./Canadian 0.05 circuits Lower is better 0.00 ITC Transmission METC All Participants participated. Sustained Outages per Circuit, 2016

Average Circuit Outage Frequency - Sustained, 2016, 100kV and Above In this study a 0.3 total of 70 0.3 companies with 0.2 approximately 0.2 65% of

Outages perCircuit Outages 0.1 U.S./Canadian Lower is better 0.1 circuits 0.0 METC ITCT RF Q1 Q2 All participated. Outage Analysis by Cause

ITCT Sustained Outages Cause Codes

25.00

20.00

15.00

10.00

5.00

0.00

5 yr Avg. 2016 Outage Analysis by Cause

METC Sustained Outages Cause Codes

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

5 yr Avg. 2016 Long-term View on Cause Codes

• ITCT 5-year averages show 71% of sustained outages are caused by external causes.

• METC 5-year averages show about 30% of outages caused by external causes, 21% by weather and 22% by line equipment.

• ITC continues to analyze outage cause data and uses this information to identify circuits, configurations or equipment that require attention. Break RTO Perspectives and Policy

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

Brenda Prokop – PJM/NYISO Marguerite Wagner – SPP, Dave Grover – MISO Transmission Organizations ITC in the NYISO Region

• Member since 2015 • No assets owned yet • Participated in two competitive transmission solicitations • Activities • Competitive transmission solicitations and process enhancements • Improvements to interconnection processes ITC in the PJM Region

• Member since 2014, transmission owner since 2016 • Own / operate facilities connecting the New Covert generating plant in southwest Michigan with the PJM market • Activities: • Participating in Order 1000 competitive proposal windows • Developing ITC Connector: proposed 1000 MW merchant transmission project to connect Ontario and PJM markets • Pursuing other transmission development opportunities • Current issues of interest: • Competitive transmission process enhancements • Interregional planning improvements • Transmission planning criteria for resilience • External capacity resource rules • Storage participation ITC in the SPP Region

• ITC Great Plains • Transmission owner since 2009 • $500 million transmission company “built from the bottom up” over the last nine years • Owner and operator of ~ 450 miles of high-voltage transmission in parts of Kansas and Oklahoma • Offices in Topeka, Dodge City and Wichita, KS and Oklahoma City • Activities • Partnerships with co-ops to develop new projects • Advocate for ITC interests at various SPP stakeholder committees and working groups Key Interests at SPP

• Business development focus • Participate in RTO Planning • Participate in competitive transmission solicitations and process enhancements • Current issues in SPP:

• Competitive transmission process enhancements • Interregional planning improvements • Generation Interconnection Process Enhancements • RTO Regional Expansion ITC in MISO

• Three Operating Companies • ITCTransmission - 3,100 circuit miles, 12,745 MW peak load • METC - 5,600 circuit miles, 9,469 MW peak load • ITC Midwest - 6,600 circuit miles, 3,724 MW peak load • Activities

• Participate in annual MISO Transmission Expansion Planning (MTEP) process to identify needed projects on our systems • Advocate at a wide variety of stakeholder committees, task forces and working groups to help shape MISO’s positions on emerging issues • Developing over $1.5 billion of MISO’s Multi-Value Project (MVP) portfolio • Co-developer of largest Market Efficiency Project (MEP) in MISO to date Key Interests at MISO

• As the only independent transmission owner in MISO, we provide a unique perspective on transmission that is not influenced by non-transmission interests • Planning and cost allocation reforms to support development of the most efficient transmission solutions • Interregional planning process improvements • Order 1000 reforms • Generation interconnection policies • Recognition of all benefits provided by a strong transmission grid Discussion

• What are one or two key differences among the various transmission regions? • What does ITC find particularly favorable or challenging about each region? • What policy or practice from another region would you like to see adopted in the region you cover? Future Projects ITC Planning Process

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

LaMont Durr Principal Engineer, Planning Agenda

• Project Cycle Overview • ITC Assessment Process • Project Types • Future Projects (projects submitted into the 2016 and 2017 MTEP cycles) Project Cycle Overview

ITC Planning Regional Design Construction Phase Planning

• ITC performs • Projects are • Once • Final step assessments submitted to identified in before each year to Midcontinent the regional operation identify Independent plan and system System approved for enhancements Operator construction necessary to (MISO) for by ITC meet future open and management, demands and transparent design keep the regional commences system review reliable ITC Assessment Process

ITC Assessment Process (as required by NERC TPL-001-4) . Three time periods studied each year (2-year, 5-year & 10-years out)

. Peak, off peak and light load studies

. Typical sensitivities performed:

. Ludington generating and pumping

. Various transactions in and out of Canada

. Thermal (flow on line vs. capacity of line) and voltage analysis performed

. System studied with all transmission elements in service and with combinations of one or more elements out

. Identify system constraints following ITC Planning Criteria which adheres to mandatory NERC Transmission Planning Standards

. Plans developed for projected criteria violations and shared with external stakeholders via the MISO Transmission Expansion Planning (MTEP) process

. Previously planned projects restudied for continued need Project Types

Baseline Reliability Projects Asset Renewal Projects Interconnection Projects

. Projects that mitigate ITC . Projects to replace existing . Projects that are initiated by planning criteria violations ITC equipment “outside” entities

. Thermal overloads, voltage, . Asset renewal drivers are . Load interconnection projects stability or short circuit combinations of the violations . Generation interconnection following: projects

. Equipment maintenance history

. Equipment end-of-life identification

. Operating performance (outage history)

. Reliability exposure/impact Whiting – Custer 138kV Rebuild

Baseline Reliability Project . Circuits overloads for various N-1 and N-2 contingencies (NERC categories P1 thru P7)

. Outages limit generation from the Monroe units

. MTEP17 Study Cycle Rebuild approximately 10 miles of the Whiting to Custer 138kV circuit Whiting – Custer Rebuild Transmission line located in Monroe County

Projected In Service Date – December 2020 Stover – Alba Jct. – Van Tyle 138kV Rebuild

Baseline Reliability Project . Thermal issues for various N-1 and N-2 contingencies (NERC categories P1, P2, P3 and P6)

. Outages limit generation from the Alpine units

. MTEP17 Study Cycle Rebuild approximately 22 miles of the Stover to Van Tyle 138kV circuit Stover – Alba – Van Tyle Rebuild Transmission line located in Antrim County

Projected In Service Date – December 2020 Buck Creek 138kV Switching Station

Thermal Issues Baseline Reliability Project . Thermal and voltage issues for various N-1 and N-2 contingencies (NERC categories P1 - P7) Beals – Hazelwood . Outages limit flow into the heavily loaded circuit Grand Rapids area

. MTEP17 Study Cycle Expand Buck Creek 138kV by cutting the Beals – Hazelwood 138kV circuit into it

Station located in Kent County Buck Creek Projected In Service Date – Voltage Issues December 2020 Airport – Long Rapids #2 138kV Line

Baseline Reliability Project . Voltage and thermal issues for N-2 contingencies (NERC category P6) . Outages limit flow into the Northern Michigan area. Voltage Issues . MTEP18 Study Cycle Rebuild approximately 6 miles of circuit #1 utilizing double circuit towers and adding the second circuit on the other side. Cut circuit #2 into existing Airport to Mio conductor and Construct approximately 3 miles of new line utilizing new ROW from Airport to complete the Airport to Mio circuit X Airport – Long Rapids #2 Project located in Alpena County 138 kV Line

Projected In Service Date – December 2021 Airport – Mio 138 kV Line Riggsville – Vanderbilt 138kV Rebuild

Baseline Reliability Project . Thermal issues for various N-1 and N-2 contingencies (NERC categories P1, P2, P3 and P6) . Outages limit flow into the Northern Michigan area. Alpine Generation and Livingston Peakers also effect flow . MTEP18 Study Cycle

Rebuild approximately 30 miles of Riggsville – Vanderbilt the Riggsville to Vanderbilt 138kV Rebuild circuit

Transmission line located in Cheboygan and Otsego Counties

Projected In Service Date – December 2021 Pere Marquette 345/138kV Transformer and Station Expansion

Baseline Reliability Project . Thermal issues for various N-1 and N-2 contingencies (NERC categories P1, P2, P3, P6 and P7) . Outages limit flow into the Northern Michigan area and limits the Ludington Units when in Generation mode . MTEP18 Study Cycle Expand the 345kV switch yard at Pere Marquette and install second 345/138kV transformer Pere Station located in Mason County Marquette Station Projected In Service Date – Expansion December 2021 Batavia – Barnum Creek Jct. 138kV Rebuild

Asset Renewal Project . Circuit towers are more than 60 years old, which lends them to higher maintenance

. High outage history – poor operating performance

. Circuit is expected to be highly loaded in future studies Batavia – Barnum Creek Jct. Rebuild . Circuit ranked in the top 20 circuits identified for rebuild considering outage history, age, condition and circuit importance

. METP17 Project Rebuild approximately 22 miles of the Batavia to Barnum Creek Jct. 138kV circuit

Transmission lines located in Branch and Calhoun Counties

Projected In Service Date – December 2020 Load Interconnection Projects

Kent County . Henry 138kV Lapeer County

. Midas 120kV Midas120kV Wayne County Henry 138kV

. Northville 120kV Northville120kV Zephyr120kV . Zephyr 120kV Generation Interconnection Projects

All Generators with Executed GIAs

J301 . G934 – 150 MW wind (Gratiot County) J466 G997

. G997 (2nd phase) – 30 MW wind (Huron County) J589 J161 J308 . J161 (2nd phase) – 44 MW wind (Tuscola County) G934 . J301 – 101 MW wind (Huron County)

. J308 – 301 MW wind (Huron County)

. J419 – 100 MW solar (Washtenaw County)

. J466 – 30 MW battery storage (Huron County) J419

. J589 – 150 MW wind (Gratiot County) Capital Project Update

2017 Partners in Business Meeting September 26, 2017

Jason Sutton Manager, Project Engineering Apex Substation

Driver • New substation request from DTE Energy in northern Ann Arbor to relieve area loads. Status • General route has been determined with detailed routing underway. • Construction will involve installing two 120kV underground feeds to a new 120-40kV DTE substation. • In-service date is targeted for end of 2018. State Substation

Driver • New substation request from DTE Energy in southern Ann Arbor to relieve area loads. Status • General route has been determined with detailed routing underway. • Construction will involve installing 2-120kV overhead feeds to a new 120-40kV DTE substation. • In-service date is targeted for end of 2018. Toll Rd. Substation

Driver • Certain shutdown plus contingency scenarios cause unacceptable voltage drops on several busses in the Fermi 120kV and 345kV switchyards. Status • Switchyard construction is nearing completion and the first four of six 120kV lines are planned to be cut into the station in 2018. • Construction of an Static Var Compensator (SVC) will begin in the winter of 2018 and should be connected in the fall of 2018. • The final two 120kV circuits should be connected in 2019. Hilton Rd. Substation

Driver • New 120kV fed substation request from DTE Energy in Ferndale to relieve overloads in the area. Status • The outage-related work to replace relaying at the remote ends started Sept. 18. • The station should be energized by Sept. 30. Skylark Substation Driver • Request from DTE to expand Skylark substation to serve additional load at the GM Tech Center in Warren. Status • Construction started the week of March 27. • The cut-ins involved multiple stages of construction in order to keep the Tech Center energized while the sub was being expanded. • The final bus cut-in is underway and expected to be complete on Sept. 29. Mercury Substation

Driver • Needed to support a DTE interconnection request to have an in service date of Dec. 1, 2017.

Status

• Substation construction is underway. • Underground 120kV construction on schedule. • Projected ISD is Jan. 8, 2018. Apple Blossom – Wind Farm

Driver • Generator interconnection for a new 100 MW wind farm named Apple Blossom. Status • Commissioning of the new Grassmere substation equipment is complete. • The line was energized the third week of September. Coldwater Project

Driver

• Interconnection request from the City of Coldwater to provide looped 138kV service to a new substation named Newton. Status

• Phase 1 involved the extension of a 138kV circuit from Michigan Ave. substation to a new substation called Newton. Newton substation was energized April 10.

• Phase 2 involves the construction of a new substation called Wagner, which will cut into the existing Verona - Batavia 138kV line. A new 13 mile line will then be built connecting Wagner to Newton. The tentative ISD for this portion is Dec. 31, 2018. Lambton – St. Clair

Driver • Upgrade relaying on 2 circuits with Hydro One to fiber optic. Status • Optical ground wire (OPGW) has been pulled across the river and is fully connected for both circuits. • Relaying work at Lambton (Hydro One) and St. Clair (ITC) is scheduled to be completed in October. Other Upcoming METC Projects Amber-Donaldson Creek 138kV Rebuild • A 20-mile upgrade from 336 aluminum conductor steel-reinforced cable (ACSR) to 954 ACSR • Relieves overloads under shutdown plus contingency scenarios • In-Service Date is 2/28/19 Meyer 345/138kV Substation • Relieves overloads of a nearby substation under shutdown plus contingency scenarios • In-Service Date is 12/31/18 Verona-Barnum Creek Jct. 138kV Rebuild • A 6-mile upgrade to 954 ACSR • Relieves various overloads under shutdown plus contingency scenarios • In-Service Date is 5/31/18 Next Up: • Afternoon Networking • Golf & Boxed Lunch • Dining Room and AMC / YAM Tour

Thank You For Attending! Save the Date

ITC Michigan Rates Meeting & Webcast October 12, 2017 in Lansing