DOCSLIB.ORG

Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich by David H. Nikkel [Dr. Nikkel’s book, which began as his dissertation, was later published, with some modifications, by Peter Lang Publishing in 1995, ISBN 0- 8204-1678-9.] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I greatly appreciate the many hours of work by the secretarial staff of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Youngstown State University, especially Anna Ficocelli. Quotations from the following works are reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago: Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vols. I & III, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951 & 1963. All rights reserved. PREFACE This work began as my 1981 Ph.D. dissertation at Duke University. I have made modifications to reflect changes in my thinking over the years, to improve felicity of wording, and to be gender neutral in language for God. The general climate in theology and religious studies is more skeptical regarding claims about ultimate reality than when I first wrote this thesis. Nevertheless, my developing a concept of panentheism is based on the convictions that belief in an ultimate reality that is the source of the universe is reasonable and that, given that basic belief, understandings of the nature of ultimate reality can be more or less plausible, more or less coherent. My hope is that I have offered a plausible and coherent vision of the nature of God. David H. Nikkel Youngstown, Ohio June, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................i PREFACE............................................ii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION..................................1 Panentheism Defined The Nature of Theological Language According to Hartshorne and Tillich II. TILLICH AS PANENTHEIST.......................41 "God Is Not a Being" Other Panentheistic Formulations III. HARTSHORNE AS PANENTHEIST...................115 IV.CRITICISM OF HARTSHORNE ON THE ACTIVE ASPECT......................................157 Undermining God as All Power Undermining the Divine Governance Other Undermining of the Divine Majesty V.CRITICISM OF TILLICH ON THE PASSIVE ASPECT......................................201 Divine Temporality?: Open or Closed? Divine Impassibility and Creaturely Freedom and Suffering VI. CONCLUSION..................................277 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................305 INDEX.............................................313 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION As my title suggests, I believe both Charles Hartshorne and Paul Tillich can, on the whole, rightly be labelled panentheists. As far as Hartshorne is concerned, the above statement is not surprising or controversial. He has used the term "panentheism" (as well as "surrelativism," "superrelativism," and "neo- classical theism") to describe his doctrine of God. And to my knowledge, no one has disputed the appropriateness of the term in that connection. Tillich on the other hand has rarely used the term and only once directly in connection with his own thinking.i Though he then favorably applied the term to his understanding of God, hardly anyone has explicitly acknowledged the strong panentheistic flavor of Tillich's theology, except James F. Anderson and Jacob Faubes,ii and to some extent Hartshorne himself in noting aspects of Tillich's thought akin to his own.iii And even less so has anyone argued for or developed the idea of Tillich as panentheist--by taking central concepts, phrases, and formulations such as "being-itself," "the ground of being," transcending "the subject-object cleavage," God as knowing God's self through the finite individuals, God as being nearer to the creatures than they are to themselves, and that God is not a being and by showing that Tillich has meant these panentheistically and that they are interrelated. Therefore, this aspect of my project is, I believe, original and significant for fully under- 4 Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich standing Tillich, as it will take an idea or ideas that are at the heart of his doctrine of God and unpack, clarify, and connect them. Panentheism Defined At this point it would be good to describe the concept of panentheism. I will be guided by the use of this term by previous thinkers, as well as by my own sense of the basic thrust of the concept. "Panentheism" literally means "all in God." (The word was coined by the early nineteenth-century German philosopher, Karl Christian Friedrich Krause.) It holds that the non-divine individuals are included in God, are fully within the divine life. God knows all that exists without externality, mediation, or loss (though God's knowledge and valuation are more than the creaturely experiences that are wholly included in the divine experience). God empowers all that exists without externality, mediation, or loss (though there is genuine indeterminacy and freedom of choice and action which God empowers in the creaturely realm). This is in contrast to traditional theism, which has tended to regard God as utterly distinct from the creation and the creatures. Deism is an extreme of this tendency. On the other hand, panentheism also distinguishes itself from pantheism (literally "all [is] God"). It holds that God is not reducible to the nondivine individuals, to the universe as a whole, or to the structure of the universe; but rather God Introduction 3 transcends them, having a reality--an awareness and a power--that includes but is not exhausted by the reality of the creation and the experiences and actions of the creatures. A distinction between a "passive" and an "active" aspect of God as panentheistically understood figures crucially in the structure and purposes of this work. As presaged in the preceding paragraph, the passive aspect refers to divine knowledge, while the active aspect refers to divine power. By using the term "passive," I am implying that by knowing what occurs, God is in some sense qualified or affected by it. The extent to which God is active and controls what happens in the universe is not prejudiced by this formal definition per se. Even for the traditional theist who believes that God totally controls our actions, that divine knowing and acting are utterly one, we could say that God's decisions affect or qualify the divine self and that the "passive" and the "active" aspects merge. However, in that case, practically speaking, the distinction would not be useful. Thus, only when, as in panentheism, it is accepted that the creatures have some indeterminacy with respect to action and that God is aware of their actions is the distinction likely to be significant.iv Hartshorne has written extensively about the cognitive aspect of the divine inclusion of creation, my "passive" aspect. Indeed, he often equates divine inclusion with God's direct and complete knowing or 4 Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich perceiving. In contrast to the creatures, who exclude much of the fullness of the experiences of others, for whom these are, relatively speaking, indirect and external, God experiences or feels precisely what we experience and feel as we experience or feel (though as above God will also have knowledge, feelings, and valuations in relation to a situation in addition to those of the individuals perfectly included). So unqualifiedly to say that God and the creatures are distinct beings is misleading, since our experiences are at the same time (without mediation though with addition) experiences of God. As panentheistically active, God coinheringly empowers all that exists--without externality, mediation or loss. The active aspect then refers to God's being the very power of being in all that is, the very power of acting in every action--but in the radical sense that whatever power we have is God's power and whatever action we take is in a (qualified) sense God's act, in that in panentheism there is no power that can be unequivocally distinguished from or contrasted to God's power, no power (just as no knowing or feeling) that is external to God as the ultimate power (and knower). There is no separation or mediation with regard to God's power as well as with regard to God's knowledge. Here again it should be remembered that God transcends as well as includes, so that divine power is more than God's power in the form of or in the manifestations that are the creaturely lives per se. Introduction 5 The preceding formal definition of the active aspect is not meant to preclude God's granting to those whom God immediately empowers the power to freely determine the divine experience to some extent. Indeed, that is the sense in which every action's being an action of God must be qualified. For, as has been said before, panentheism upholds the mutual transcendence of God and the creatures with respect to freedom. God does not make our decisions for us, so far as those are indeterminate. That panentheistic empowerment is compatible with some indeterminate creaturely freedom will be argued in chapter 6. One could say that, insofar as there is indeterminacy in creaturely actions, the creatures are in that sense "external" to God. One could also speak of a further "separation" to the extent they willfully act contrary to the divine will. This latter separation is akin to more or less involuntary unawareness of God, in that these both are estrangements from the side of the creatures and do not involve separation by God as ultimate power and knower beyond the independence involved in creaturely freedom per se. But such freedom need not I believe controvert that the creatures are not "external" to or "separated" from God in the sense that I have intended and will intend when I speak thusly: namely, that God encompasses them, knowing perfectly and fully empowering whatever actions the creatures may take in their freedom. In passing I will note that when I say "being," 6 Panentheism in Hartshorne and Tillich as in "God is the very power of being in all that has being," I am not using it in contrast to "becoming." I have no objection to "God is the very power of becoming in all that becomes." For I endorse temporality with regard to both the world and God.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Need to Believe in Life After Death Questions About Islam?
    “To the righteous soul will be said: O (thou) soul, in In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful (complete) rest and satisfaction! Come back to your Lord, well pleased (yourself), and well pleasing unto Him! Enter you, then, among my devotees! And enter you My “To the righteous soul will be said: O (thou) soul, in (complete) rest and satisfaction! Heaven!” [Al-Qur’an 89:27] Come back to your Lord, well pleased (yourself), and well pleasing unto Him! Enter you, then, among my devotees! And enter you My Heaven!” [Al-Qur'an 89: 27-28] In Islam, an individual's life after death or Him in the heavens or in the earth,but it is in a clear their Hereafter, is very closely shaped by Record.That He may reward those who believe and do their present life. Life after death begins with good works.For them are pardon and a rich provision. the resurrection of man, after which there will But those who strive against our revelations, come a moment when every human will be shaken as challenging (Us), theirs will be a painful doom of they are confronted with their intentions and wrath.” [Al-Qur’an: 34: 3-5] deeds, good and bad, and even by their failure to do good in this life. On the Day of Judgment the entire record of people from the age of puberty The need to believe in life after death will be presented before God. God will weigh Belief in life after death has always been part of the ath Lifeafter De everyone’s good and bad deeds according to His teachings of the Prophets and is an essential condition Questions about Islam? Mercy and His Justice, forgiving many sins and of being a Muslim.Whenever we are asked to do or would you like to: multiplying many good deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Theoretical Conception Of
    KANT’S THEORETICAL CONCEPTION OF GOD Yaron Noam Hoffer Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy, September 2017 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee _________________________________________ Allen W. Wood, Ph.D. (Chair) _________________________________________ Sandra L. Shapshay, Ph.D. _________________________________________ Timothy O'Connor, Ph.D. _________________________________________ Michel Chaouli, Ph.D 15 September, 2017 ii Copyright © 2017 Yaron Noam Hoffer iii To Mor, who let me make her ends mine and made my ends hers iv Acknowledgments God has never been an important part of my life, growing up in a secular environment. Ironically, only through Kant, the ‘all-destroyer’ of rational theology and champion of enlightenment, I developed an interest in God. I was drawn to Kant’s philosophy since the beginning of my undergraduate studies, thinking that he got something right in many topics, or at least introduced fruitful ways of dealing with them. Early in my Graduate studies I was struck by Kant’s moral argument justifying belief in God’s existence. While I can’t say I was convinced, it somehow resonated with my cautious but inextricable optimism. My appreciation for this argument led me to have a closer look at Kant’s discussion of rational theology and especially his pre-critical writings. From there it was a short step to rediscover early modern metaphysics in general and embark upon the current project. This journey could not have been completed without the intellectual, emotional, and material support I was very fortunate to receive from my teachers, colleagues, friends, and family.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gnostic Catechism
    Ecclesia Gnostica A Gnostic Catechism Prepared by The Most Reverend Stephan A. Hoeller Los Angeles, California A.D. 1998 © Stephan A. Hoeller, 1998 Electronic Edition printed by The Gnostic Society Press, 2010 ii CONTENTS Preface ____________________________________________________________________ v Prayers and Creeds _____________________________________________________ 1 Lesson I. Of God And The Universe ___________________________________ 8 Lesson II. Of The Spiritual Worlds and the Demiurge ____________ 13 Lesson III. Of the Human Being ______________________________________ 18 Lesson IV. Of Gnosis and Salvation __________________________________ 21 Lesson V. Of the Lord Christ __________________________________________ 24 Lesson VI. Of Our Lady Sophia _______________________________________ 28 Lesson VII. Of the Holy Spirit and Grace ____________________________ 32 Lesson VIII. Of the Church and the Communion of Saints _______ 35 Lesson IX. Of the Sacraments or Mysteries ________________________ 41 Lesson X. Of the Sacraments, Considered Singly: Part I _________ 45 Lesson XI. Of the Sacraments, Considered Singly: Part II ________ 51 Appendix A. Prayer ____________________________________________________ 56 Appendix B. The Gnostic in the World ______________________________ 57 Bibliography ____________________________________________________________ 58 iii iv P R E F A C E Why a Gnostic Catechism? "A Gnostic Catechism? What a preposterous idea and a contradiction in terms to boot!" Such and similar objections are likely to be forthcoming in response to the present effort. The word "catechism" readily conjures up visions of dogmatic belief, enshrined in rigidly formulated articles and designed to be memorized and mindlessly recited by children and by adults of childish minds. Yet a catechism is truly but a compendium of instructions, usually of a religious nature, arranged in the form of questions and answers.
    [Show full text]
  • On Distorting the Love, of God* Τ D
    BIBLIOTHECA SACRA 156 (January-March 1999): 3-12 ON DISTORTING THE LOVE, OF GOD* τ D. A. Carson JL he title of this series, "The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God," might lead some to question my sanity. If I were speak• ing about "The Difficult Doctrine of the Trinity," or "The Diffi• cult Doctrine of Predestination," at least the title would be coher• ent. Is not the doctrine of the love of God easy, compared with such high-flown and mysterious teachings? W H Y THE DOCTRINE O F THE LOVE OF G O D MUST B E J U D G E D DIFFICULT This doctrine is difficult for at least five reasons. First, the over• whelming majority of people who believe in God, however they think he, she, or it may be understood, believe God is a loving Being. But that is what makes the task of Christian witnessing so daunting. For with increasing frequency this widely dissemi• nated belief in the love of God is set in some matrix other than biblical theology. The result is that when informed Christians talk about the love of God they mean something very different from what is meant in the surrounding culture. Worse, neither side may perceive that this is the case. Consider some recent products of the film industry, that celluloid preserve that both reflects and shapes American culture. Science-fiction space films may be divided into two kinds. Perhaps the more popular ones are the slam-bang-shoot-'em-up kind, such as July Fourth, or the four-part Alien series, complete with loathsome evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Panentheism and Panexperientialism for Open and Relational Theology
    Panentheism and Panexperientialism for Open and Relational Theology Thomas Jay Oord and Wm. Andrew Schwartz Open and relational theologies have a particular affinity for panentheism and panexperientialism (panpsychism). These theologies come in various forms, however. And scholars propose various forms of panentheism and panexperi- entialism. Diversity reigns. We begin this essay by describing open and relational theology. We also describe panentheism and panexperientialism, broadly understood. We note reasons why open and relational theists would be attracted to each. And we argue that panentheism and panexperientialism complement one another, al- though a person could be attracted only to one. Much of the essay argues for one form of open and relational theology we think makes the best sense overall. This form includes belief in a personal/ relational God, makes distinctions between God and creatures, affirms God ev- erlastingly creates (thereby denying creatio ex nihilo), and offers a solution to the theoretical aspect of the problem of evil. Adopting panexperientialism and panentheism offers ways to overcome theoretical problems in contemporary thought, while arguably motivating adherents of the view to love (promote overall well-being). 1. Open and Relational Theology The label »open and relational theology« serves as an umbrella designation for a family of theologies.1 This family shares at least two core convictions. The »open« aspect refers to the idea that both creatures and God experience the ongoingness of time. Consequently, both God and creatures face an open, yet to be determined future. Because the future is not actual, it is inherently 1 These include theologies using labels such as open theism, process theism, various relational theologies, some Wesleyan theologies, some feminist theologies, some ecological theologies, some Arminian theologies, some postcolonial theologies, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peircean Panentheist Scientific Mysticism1
    International Journal of Transpersonal Studies Volume 27 | Issue 1 Article 5 1-1-2008 A Peircean Panentheist Scientific ysM ticism Søren Brier Copenhagen Business School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/ijts-transpersonalstudies Part of the Philosophy Commons, Psychology Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Brier, S. (2008). Brier, S. (2008). A Peircean panentheist scientific ysm ticism. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27(1), 20–45.. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2008.27.1.20 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Newsletters at Digital Commons @ CIIS. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Transpersonal Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CIIS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Peircean Panentheist Scientific Mysticism1 Søren Brier2 Copenhagen Business School Copenhagen, Denmark Peirce’s philosophy can be interpreted as an integration of mysticism and science. In Peirce’s philosophy mind is feeling on the inside and on the outside, spontaneity, chance and chaos with a tendency to take habits. Peirce’s philosophy has an emptiness beyond the three worlds of reality (his Categories), which is the source from where the categories spring. He empha- sizes that God cannot be conscious in the way humans are, because there is no content in his “mind.” Since there is a transcendental3 nothingness behind and before the categories, it seems that Peirce had a mystical view on reality with a transcendental Godhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Monotheism: a Signal of Transcendence Challenging
    Liberty University Original Monotheism: A Signal of Transcendence Challenging Naturalism and New Ageism A Thesis Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Divinity in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Ministry Department of Christian Leadership and Church Ministries by Daniel R. Cote Lynchburg, Virginia April 5, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Daniel R. Cote All Rights Reserved ii Liberty University School of Divinity Thesis Project Approval Sheet Dr. T. Michael Christ Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity Dr. Phil Gifford Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity iii THE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY THESIS PROJECT ABSTRACT Daniel R. Cote Liberty University School of Divinity, 2020 Mentor: Dr. T. Michael Christ Where once in America, belief in Christian theism was shared by a large majority of the population, over the last 70 years belief in Christian theism has significantly eroded. From 1948 to 2018, the percent of Americans identifying as Catholic or Christians dropped from 91 percent to 67 percent, with virtually all the drop coming from protestant denominations.1 Naturalism and new ageism increasingly provide alternative means for understanding existential reality without the moral imperatives and the belief in the divine associated with Christian theism. The ironic aspect of the shifting of worldviews underway in western culture is that it continues with little regard for strong evidence for the truth of Christian theism emerging from historical, cultural, and scientific research. One reality long overlooked in this regard is the research of Wilhelm Schmidt and others, which indicates that the earliest religion of humanity is monotheism. Original monotheism is a strong indicator of the existence of a transcendent God who revealed Himself as portrayed in Genesis 1-11, thus affirming the truth of essential elements of Christian theism and the falsity of naturalism and new ageism.
    [Show full text]
  • KIERKEGAARD's APOPHATIC THEOLOGY by Peter Kline
    PASSION FOR NOTHING: KIERKEGAARD’S APOPHATIC THEOLOGY By Peter Kline Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor William Franke Professor Ellen Armour Professor Laurel Schneider Professor David Wood ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing this dissertation has been, if not an act of faith, then certainly some kind of leap or abandon. It is not a little astonishing to me to that I have finished it. There has been the struggle to work through a complex subject matter, of course. But more than anything, there has been the struggle to find my voice, to feel out what kind of theological, philosophical, and spiritual music I am capable of and to wonder, often anxiously, whether it is worth playing. There are those in the academy who would have the dissertation be simply functional, one last requirement on the way to the desired goal, The Degree (followed by The Job and The Career). I have never been able to approach my writing in such a teleological fashion. I seem to be unable to approach writing otherwise than as a practice of what Foucault called “the care of the self.” Learning and putting into practice such self-care in this dissertation has been a difficult pleasure. Thankfully, Kierkegaard was an unfailing companion and guide in this task even as he was my subject matter. There are many along the way who supported me with care and made this dissertation possible. I’d like to name a few of them here.
    [Show full text]
  • Names of God Bible Study 5-30
    Alpha & Omega A Study on the Names of God a contemplation on Identity and Self Worth based upon whose, rather than who, we are Kay Wyma & Candy Hill There is something in every Name of God which may breed faith in our souls. Whether we know him as Jehovah, Elohim, Shaddai, or Lord, or by whatsoever other name he has been pleased to manifest himself, that title becomes the ground of our confidence, and is the means of fostering faith in his people’s minds, when they come to understand its meaning. To a trembling people the Lord enlarges on his wonderful names. I think he also does it to excite our wonder and our gratitude. He that loves us so much is Jehovah: he that can create and destroy; he that is the self-existent God; he, even he, has set his heart upon his people, and loves them and counts them precious in his sight. It is a marvelous thing. The more one thinks of it, the more shall he be overwhelmed with astonishment, that he who is everything should love us…i - Charles Spurgeon Copyright 2018, Kay Wills Wyma Elohim Creator Jehovah/Yahweh Self-Existent One Jehovah Jireh The LORD will Provider Jehovah Nissi The LORD is our Banner El Roi God Who Sees Jehovah Rapha The LORD Who Heals Jehovah Raah The LORD is Shepherd Jehovah Shalom The LORD is Peace Jehovah Sabaoth The LORD of Hosts El Shaddai All Sufficient One El Elyon Most High God Abba Father Alpha & Omega A devotional on the Names of God & a study on Identity and Self-Worth based upon whose, rather than who, we are What’s in a name? A lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology of Supernatural
    religions Article Theology of Supernatural Pavel Nosachev School of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] Received: 15 October 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: The main research issues of the article are the determination of the genesis of theology created in Supernatural and the understanding of ways in which this show transforms a traditional Christian theological narrative. The methodological framework of the article, on the one hand, is the theory of the occulture (C. Partridge), and on the other, the narrative theory proposed in U. Eco’s semiotic model. C. Partridge successfully described modern religious popular culture as a coexistence of abstract Eastern good (the idea of the transcendent Absolute, self-spirituality) and Western personified evil. The ideal confirmation of this thesis is Supernatural, since it was the bricolage game with images of Christian evil that became the cornerstone of its popularity. In the 15 seasons of its existence, Supernatural, conceived as a story of two evil-hunting brothers wrapped in a collection of urban legends, has turned into a global panorama of world demonology while touching on the nature of evil, the world order, theodicy, the image of God, etc. In fact, this show creates a new demonology, angelology, and eschatology. The article states that the narrative topics of Supernatural are based on two themes, i.e., the theology of the spiritual war of the third wave of charismatic Protestantism and the occult outlooks derived from Emmanuel Swedenborg’s system. The main topic of this article is the role of monotheistic mythology in Supernatural.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtuous Life, Honored Afterlife and the Evolution of Confucianism
    History in the Making Volume 10 Article 7 January 2017 Virtuous Life, Honored Afterlife and the Evolution of Confucianism Jasmyn Murrell CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Asian History Commons Recommended Citation Murrell, Jasmyn (2017) "Virtuous Life, Honored Afterlife and the Evolution of Confucianism," History in the Making: Vol. 10 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol10/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jasmyn Murrell Virtuous Life, Honored Afterlife and the Evolution of Confucianism By Jasmyn Murrell Abstract: Confucius states that we must not focus on the afterlife, because we know so little of it, and we must focus on everyday life. However, Confucianism holds a philosophy of afterlife, even if it is not outright said or depicted. This paper will aim to prove just that. First, through Confucian ideals of being a dutiful person, to grant yourself an honored afterlife, and second, through how Confucianism influenced other religions such as Buddhism and Daoism, which will show a clear depiction of afterlife by considering death rituals, festivals, commune with ancestors, prayers, tomb decor, and the ideology of Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism – you will begin to see the depiction of afterlife within Confucianism. But also, you will get to see how Confucianism has evolved and took on traits of both Daoism and Buddhism, which in turn is called Neo-Confucianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Panentheism and Its Neighbors
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2019) 85:23–41 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9687-9 ARTICLE Panentheism and its neighbors Mikael Stenmark1 Received: 10 October 2018 / Accepted: 19 October 2018 / Published online: 27 October 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract In this paper I suggest that we should identify panentheism on a scale, with deism at one extreme and pantheism at the other. The surprising outcome of the analysis is that many of the things which in the philosophical and theological debate are simply taken for granted as distinguishing panentheism from traditional theism (and vice versa) turn out to be possible extension claims rather than core doctrines of these diferent conceptions of God. Nevertheless, I maintain that it remains possible to draw a line between them. It is also emphasized that the greatest challenge many panentheists face is to give a convincing argument why we should think that God’s power can never be coercive, but must always be persuasive. The good news is that there is nothing in panentheism that requires that we must accept this particular doctrine. Keywords Panentheism · Classical theism · Deism · Pantheism · Process theism One of the models or conceptions of God that has received most attention recently, among both philosophers and theologians, is panentheism. It has been developed in several diferent ways and has been contrasted on the one hand with (traditional) theism and on the other with pantheism. But what is panentheism and how, more exactly, should we state the core diferences between it and (traditional) theism and, secondly, between it and pantheism? All this is far from clear, but we need to fnd answers if panentheism is intended to become the golden middle road between these two perceived extremes.
    [Show full text]