DOCSLIB.ORG

An Assessment of Bicycle Theft in Denmark

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Assessment of Bicycle Theft in Denmark WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE Faculty Code: REL Project Sequence: 8004 IQP Division: 44 An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor of Science. Free Wheels: An Assessment of Bicycle Theft in Denmark Submitted to the Dansk Cyklist Forbund (DCF) Jakob Schiøtt Stenbæk Madsen (Project Liaison) - [email protected] Jens Loft Rasmussen (Director) - [email protected] Submitted by: Ryan Cantalupo - [email protected] Ian Crowe - [email protected] Sonja Kent - [email protected] May 3, 2013 This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Background ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Denmark: Cycling Nation .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Bicycle Theft in Denmark .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Current Anti-Theft Measures .............................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Bike Theft Prevention Programs ....................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3: Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 4: Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Understanding the Impact of Bicycle Theft and Anti-Theft Measures ............................................. 20 4.2 Identification of Stakeholder Interests ............................................................................................. 21 4.3 Evaluation of Current Prevention and Recovery Methods ............................................................... 23 4.4 Discussion of Theft Reduction Strategies ......................................................................................... 24 Chapter 5: Results and Analysis .................................................................................................................. 26 5.1 The State of Bicycle Theft ................................................................................................................. 26 5.2 Stakeholder Opinions ........................................................................................................................ 33 5.2.1 Danish Cyclists ............................................................................................................................ 35 5.2.2 The DCF ...................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.3 Insurance Companies ................................................................................................................. 37 5.2.4 Bicycle Dealers ........................................................................................................................... 39 5.2.5 Involved Businesses ................................................................................................................... 39 5.2.6 Danish Municipalities ................................................................................................................. 41 5.2.7 Police .......................................................................................................................................... 41 Chapter 6: Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 7: Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 45 7.1 Anti- Bicycle Theft Campaign ............................................................................................................ 45 7.2 City-Wide Solutions ........................................................................................................................... 48 7.2.1 Improved Parking ....................................................................................................................... 48 7.2.2 Abandoned Bicycle Cleanup ....................................................................................................... 50 7.2.3 Open Police Database ................................................................................................................ 51 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................ 53 Appendix ..................................................................................................................................................... 58 A. Interviews ........................................................................................................................................... 58 The DCF ............................................................................................................................................... 58 Police ................................................................................................................................................... 65 Anti-Bike Theft Organizations ............................................................................................................. 68 Politician/City Planner ......................................................................................................................... 69 Forsikring og pension (Representative of Danish insurance agencies) .............................................. 70 Danish cyclists ..................................................................................................................................... 73 Bicycle Dealers (March 2013) ............................................................................................................. 75 HVISCYKEL.dk (April 2nd 2013) ........................................................................................................... 77 B. Survey ................................................................................................................................................. 81 C. Sponsor Description ............................................................................................................................ 84 D. Train Station Observations ................................................................................................................. 86 E. Denmark Municipalities ...................................................................................................................... 87 F. Website Pages ..................................................................................................................................... 88 G. Infographics ........................................................................................................................................ 90 i Abstract This project, sponsored by the Danish Cyclist Federation, describes the current state of bicycle theft in Copenhagen with the ultimate goal of recommending the best solutions to help reduce the problem. From our research it was concluded that the cycling infrastructure is insufficient to successfully support a technological solution and the general attitude towards the individual's ability to prevent bike theft needs to be improved. In addition to fully documenting our results in this report, our research has led to the development and proposal of a cohesive social awareness campaign on bicycle theft. ii Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who assisted with our project. Without these people, our IQP would not have been possible to complete so fully. Special thanks to the Dansk Cyklist Forbund for giving us such a challenging and interesting project; our liaison Jakob Madsen, the director of the DCF Jens Rasmussen, our advisor Reinhold Ludwig, and Robert Hersh for their guidance; site coordinators Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen for establishing this project;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HOLD the DATE on a Homeowners Or Renter’S Insurance Policy
    46 .32 .791 301 40 217 MD wn, ersto Hag t, Stree tomac Po N. 6 R ENTE C E M O LC E W R ISITO V N W NTO W O Bike Routes D .com ries emo ndm ryla .ma www Hub City Bike Loop k State Highway/Existing Bike Route Par ls Existing Bike Lane Mil HUB CITY BIKE LOOP Existing Multi-Use Path about bi about town? Hagers in ing cycl 7 x125 7 857 01.739. 3 LL ONS STI CA QUE 1740 2 MD wn, ersto Hag t tree S in nkl Fra E. One 210 Room Hall, y Suggested Bike Friendly Route Cit org ownmd. erst .hag www Points of Interest 1 Hagerstown–Washington County Convention & Visitors Bureau Scan here to watch a video of the Hub City Bike Loop. 2 Hagerstown Police Department The 10-mile loop around the City starts and ends in au ure B s itor Vis nd a ion ent onv C unty Co ton hing Was wn- sto 3 Washington County Bus Transfer Center Fairgrounds Park and uses Hager the the y, b rt pa in and, own rst Hage of City he t by red both on-street bike lanes Sponso 4 Discovery Station and multi-use paths. 5 University Systems of Maryland–Hagerstown s bert Gys 6 Barbara Ingram School for the Arts David —Mayor 7 Farmer’s Market own! rst age H d oun ar des ri afe s of es mil many you ish 8 Pangborn Park w I n. stow 9 Fairgrounds Park and Hager ve ut ut ugho hro t s ack r e bik ic publ more g lin instal e Hagerstown Ice & Sports Complex ry A ar we ng, rki pa ike b to access ease incr to y, ll iona Addit y.
    [Show full text]
  • License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas
    MEETING DATE: April 17, 2019 PREPARED BY: Crystal Najera, CAP DEPT. DIRECTOR: Karen P. Brust Program Administrator DEPARTMENT: City Manager CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to execute a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (in substantial form as attached) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas (Attachment 5). STRATEGIC PLAN: This item is related to the following Strategic Plan focus areas: • Environment—promotes the use of emissions-free bicycles as an alternative mode of transportation. • Transportation—supports a transportation mode that accommodates more people with minimal impact on the community. • Recreation—promotes active lifestyles and community health. • Economic Development—addresses the “last mile” gap between public transit and local businesses and promotes tourism. FISCAL CONSIDERATIONS: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation. Gotcha will bear the sole cost of deploying and operating the bike share program. Minimal City staff time will be needed to coordinate with Gotcha to ensure that the program operates in a manner beneficial to the City. BACKGROUND: Bike share is a service through which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to rent a bicycle at one location and return it either at the same location or at a different location within a defined geographic boundary. Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicle, is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions in Encinitas and the North County coastal region.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual
    OWNER’S MANUAL OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITY Consult last page of manual for Warranty Registration This manual contains important information regarding the safe operation and maintenance of your bicycle. Read all sections and appendices before you ride your new bicycle, and carefully follow the instructions. Instructions preceded by the words NOTE, CAUTION, or WARNING are of special significance. NOTE: Instructions which are of special interest. CAUTION: Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, may result in minor or moderate injury, or is an alert against unsafe practices. WARNING: Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, could result in serious injury or death. THEFT AND WARRANTY INFORMATION • Record all numbers shown on the bicycle. • Be sure to fill out warranty information online (or mail in if you do not have access to a computer). NOTE: The serial number is not on record where your bicycle was sold or manufactured, you must register it. Keep the following information along with a copy of your sales receipt. Serial Number: Model Name: Store Purchased From: Purchase Date: Color: Size: • Lock your bicycle securely whenever it is out of your sight. • Also, carefully follow the instructions in any additional literature supplied with the bicycle. WARNING: Before your first ride, check the brakes and all cam action retention devices. Service, if necessary, is described in the maintenance section of this manual. • Register your bicycle with your local law enforcement agency & National Bike Registry. • Report any theft immediately. • Add your bicycle to your homeowner’s or apartment insurance policy. Serial Number Locations WARNING: MUST READ BEFORE RIDING • Obtain, read, and follow Owner’s Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Del Mar Staff Report
    City of Del Mar Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Clem Brown, Environmental Sustainability/Special Projects Manager Via Scott Huth, City Manager DATE: May 6, 2019 SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the City Council approve a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (Attachment A) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The City of Del Mar is committed to reducing local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit the effects of climate change, while also offering viable transportation alternatives to driving. Del Mar has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that establishes a number of strategies to meet GHG emissions reduction targets, including facilitating safe, convenient, and affordable alternative transportation options. Specifically, Goal 14 in the CAP includes a strategy to “explore implementation of a bike share program…to provide another transportation alternative for traveling in town.” Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicles, is a major source of GHG emissions in Del Mar and the other north San Diego County (North County) coastal cities. Offering and promoting programs like bike share, that replace vehicle trips with bike trips, is one way Del Mar can help to reduce emissions while offering more efficient and more affordable transportation modes for residents, employees, and visitors. Bike share is a service by which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to borrow a bicycle at one location and return it either to the same or an alternate location within a defined geographic boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BICYCLE RING in AARHUS, DENMARK: a Case Study of Maintaining People Friendly Environments While Managing Cycling Growth
    THE BICYCLE RING IN AARHUS, DENMARK: a case study of maintaining people friendly environments while managing cycling growth Urban Planning & Management | Master Thesis | Aalborg University | June 2017 Estella Johanna Hollander & Matilda Kristina Porsö Title: The Bicycle Ring in Aarhus, Denmark: a case study of maintaining people friendly environments while managing cycling growth Study: M.Sc. in UrBan Planning and Management, School of Architecture, Design and Planning, AalBorg University Project period: FeBruary to June 2017 Authors: Estella Johanna Hollander and Matilda Kristina Porsö Supervisor: Gunvor RiBer Larsen Pages: 111 pages Appendices: 29 pages (A-E) i Abstract This research project seeks to analyze the relationship Between cycling and people friendly environments, specifically focusing on the growth in cycling numbers and the associated challenges. To exemplify this relationship, this research project uses a case study of the Bicycle Ring (Cykelringen) in Aarhus, Denmark. Four corners around the Bicycle Ring, with different characteristics in the Built environment, are explored further. In cities with a growing population, such as Aarhus, moBility is an important focus because the amount of travel will increase, putting a higher pressure on the existing infrastructure. In Aarhus, cycling is used as a tool to facilitate the future demand of travel and to overcome the negative externalities associated with car travel. The outcome of improved mobility and accessibility is seen as complementary to a good city life in puBlic spaces. Therefore, it is argued that cycling is a tool to facilitate people friendly environments. Recently, the City of Aarhus has implemented cycle streets around the Bicycle Ring as a solution to improve the conditions around the ring.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Bike Maintenance and Availability
    Project Number: 44-JSD-DPC3 City-Bike Maintenance and Availability An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Michael DiDonato Stephen Herbert Disha Vachhani Date: May 6, 2002 Professor James Demetry, Advisor Abstract This report analyzes the Copenhagen City-Bike Program and addresses the availability problems. We depict the inner workings of the program and its problems, focusing on possible causes. We include analyses of public bicycle systems throughout the world and the design rationale behind them. Our report also examines the technology underlying “smart-bike” systems, comparing the advantages and costs relative to coin deposit bikes. We conclude with recommendations on possible allocation of the City Bike Foundation’s resources to increase the quality of service to the community, while improving the publicity received by the city of Copenhagen. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for making this project successful. First, we thank WPI and the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division for providing off- campus project sites. By organizing this Copenhagen project, Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen provided us with unique personal experiences of culture and local customs. Our advisor, James Demetry, helped us considerably throughout the project. His suggestions gave us the motivation and encouragement to make this project successful and enjoyable. We thank Kent Ljungquist for guiding us through the preliminary research and proposal processes and Paul Davis who, during a weekly visit, gave us a new perspective on our objectives. We appreciate all the help that our liaison, Jens Pedersen, and the Danish Cyclist Federation provided for us during our eight weeks in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Promotion of Cycling in Denmark - Study Trip April 28-30, 2019
    Planning and Promotion of Cycling in Denmark - Study Trip April 28-30, 2019 The study includes lectures about Odense, Copenhagen and Gladsaxe (a Copenhagen suburb, entitled "This Year's Bicycle Municipality" by Danish Cyclists' Federation 2016). Besides lectures there will be plenty of bicycle trips in and outside Copenhagen, some of them on bicycle super highways, others in combination with public transport, all of which will enable the participants to experience Danish cycling themselves. The study trip offers several opportunities for formal and informal discussions. Sunday, April 28, 2019 (optional) 19:30-21:00 Evening get together. Monday, April 29, 2019 08:30-10:00 Bicycle excursion in central Copenhagen, passing Dronning Louises Bro (Europe’s busiest bicycle street) and other high- level bicycle facilities, ending at Cyklistforbundet (Danish Cyclists’ Federation). 10:00-11:00 Klaus Bondam, director of Cyklistforbundet (Danish Cyclists' Federation) and former Mayor of Traffic in Copenhagen: How to campaign for cycling in a bicycle friendly environment. 11:00-12:00 Bicycle excursion to Islands Photo: Jens Erik Larsen Brygge via the iconic Cykelslangen and Bryggebroen. 12:00-13:00 Lunch 13:00-14:00 City of Copenhagen, Bicycle Program Office: Promotion of cycling in Copenhagen, current strategy and main inputs and outcomes. 14:00-14:45 Sidsel Birk Hjuler, manager of project "Supercykelstier": Cycle Superhighways in the Capital Region, challenges and results. 14:45-15:00 Coffee break 15:00-16:00 Troels Andersen, senior traffic planner from Odense Municipality: Odense City of Cyclists, planning, public relations and realization. 16:00-16:15 Jens Erik Larsen and Thomas Krag: Reflections on the day’s excursions and introduction to the last part.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle-Body-City: Experiences of Urban Cycling in Copenhagen
    Bicycle-Body-City: Experiences of Urban Cycling in Copenhagen Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Research (MRES) Lucinda Libershal Casbolt (BA) Department of Anthropology Macquarie University Sydney, Australia Supervised by Dr Christopher Houston Submitted 9 October 2015 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 4 Statement of Authorship ................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 6 Beginnings ............................................................................................................................ 7 I. Morning Beats .......................................................................................................................... 7 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 III. For Context .......................................................................................................................... 17 Part 1: The Bicycle-Body .............................................................................................. 22 I. Annie .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poised for Pedaling: Comparing Bicycle
    POISED FOR PEDALING: COMPARING BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK AND PORTLAND, OREGON by SEAN VERMILYA A THESIS Presented to the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science June 2020 An Abstract of the Thesis of Sean Vermilya for the degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management to be taken June 2020 Title: Poised for Pedaling: Comparing Bicycle Infrastructure in Copenhagen, Denmark and Portland, Oregon Approved: Marc Schlossberg Primary Thesis Advisor This thesis investigates the following question: how can Portland learn from Copenhagen’s policy successes and failures to better develop, implement, and utilize bicycle infrastructure going forward? The thesis begins by addressing each city’s mobility history and how that history contributes to current transportation networks. Historical cycling support helps explain Copenhagen’s strong network today, while the US’s embrace of the automobile prevented Portland from fully embracing the bicycle. The thesis then deconstructs the differences between bicycle infrastructure in Copenhagen and Portland along five focus areas: design, municipal control, societal values, current politics, and equity. Copenhagen’s cyclist-friendly design, egalitarian societal values, and strong social safety net contribute to its superior cycling network and bring more cyclists to the streets. These advantages serve as models for Portland for emulate. However, the cities’ common struggles with municipal infrastructure control and mobility politics demonstrate cycling’s divisive nature regardless of locale. They also show that improvement remains well within Portland’s reach.
    [Show full text]
  • We're Working on It | Page 5
    MEMBERS' HOPES FOR 2018 | 2 WE HIRED AN ADVICE COLUMNIST. KINDA | 7 WOMEN OVER 50 EMPOWERING EACH OTHER | 9 WHAT YOU'RE MISSING AT MCLAREN BIKE PARK | 10 We're working on it | page 5 EDITOR LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Chris Cassidy ASSOCIATE EDITOR MEMBERS' HOPES AND DREAMS IN 2018 Howard Levitt COPY EDITOR PUTTING OUR VALUES INTO ACTION Christopher White DISTRIBUTION Zack Lipson DESIGN Julia Schaber By the time you read this letter, your San Francisco Bicycle Coalition board of The Tube Times is a quarterly publication of the San Francisco directors will have approved a new five-year Strategic Plan to guide our work Bicycle Coalition, a member-based advocacy organization through 2022. I want to thank all of you who informed the scope and direction of this transforming San Francisco’s streets into more livable, safe places by promoting the bicycle for everyday transportation. plan by attending an open house or a forum, responding to our survey, or sitting down for a listening session. I also want to thank board, staff and members who ADVOCACY DIRECTOR served on the committee that sifted through all the rich data that resulted from that Janice Li, x302, [email protected] process, analyzed it, and helped draft and revise the plan until we arrived at the final BICYCLE PARKING COORDINATOR Bridget Zapata, x303, [email protected] product. We are excited to share this bold plan in detail with members and the world BICYCLE PARKING COORDINATOR in the coming weeks, so watch your inboxes. Rourke Healey, x303, [email protected] Our mission of promoting the bicycle for everyday transportation remains the reason COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR Chris Cassidy, x308, [email protected] for our organization's existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlicensed Dockless Bike Sharing
    UNLICENSED DOCKLESS BIKE SHARING – COMMON POSITION PAPER – INTRODUCTION This common position of the International Association of Public Transport (UITP), the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) and its Platform for European Bike Sharing and Systems (PEBSS), recognises that there are currently significant changes happening in the operation, technology and business models of bike sharing systems. Over the past decade, station-based bike sharing has been successfully introduced to many cities worldwide, encouraging more cycling and promoting more healthy and liveable cities. While the environmental benefits of docked bike sharing is clear, the high implementation and operation costs have deterred some cities from embracing these schemes that promote the benefits of active travel. The introduction of smart bikes allows for dockless operation, which involves lighter infrastructure at a lower cost. We have recently seen the emergence of privately funded dockless bike sharing systems, operating without public licensing. This has a variety of implications for a city’s transport policy. This paper provides a framework and recommendations for cities and relevant authorities to ensure dockless bike sharing schemes contribute to the objectives of a wider sustainable urban mobility policy and efficiently complement public transport. Active mobility such as cycling and walking is crucial to any sustainable urban mobility strategy based on a high quality public transport system for more liveable and healthier cities. New wave of unlicensed dockless bike parking areas so that another rider can find share operators or locate it for the next ride. Since spring 2016, there has been a dramatic increase, primarily in China, of un- anchored, free-floating and app-controlled private bike share operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Bicycle Commuting in the Washington, DC Region: the Role of Bicycle Parking, Cyclist Showers, and Free Car Parking at Work
    Transportation Research Part D 17 (2012) 525–531 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part D journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trd Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work Ralph Buehler Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Tech, Alexandria Center, 1021 Prince Street, Room 228, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA article info abstract Keywords: This article examines the role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, free car parking and tran- Bicycling to work sit benefits as determinants of cycling to work. The analysis is based on commute data of Bicycle parking workers in the Washington, DC area. Results of rare events logistic regressions indicate that Car parking bicycle parking and cyclist showers are related to higher levels of bicycle commuting—even Cyclist showers when controlling for other explanatory variables. The odds for cycling to work are greater Trip-end facilities for employees with access to both cyclist showers and bike parking at work compared to those with just bike parking, but no showers at work. Free car parking at work is associated with 70% smaller odds for bike commuting. Employer provided transit commuter benefits appear to be unrelated to bike commuting. Regression coefficients for control variables have expected signs, but not all are statistically significant. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Over the last decades US cities have increasingly promoted bicycle commuting to reduce local and global air pollution, combat peak hour traffic congestion, and achieve health benefits from physical activity (Alliance for Biking and Walking, 2012).
    [Show full text]