Çàïîâ²äíà Ñïðàâà  Óêðà¯Í²

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Çàïîâ²äíà Ñïðàâà  Óêðà¯Í² ISSN 17297184 ÇÀÏβÄÍÀ ÑÏÐÀÂÀ  ÓÊÐÀ¯Í² ðîçóì³þ÷è îáåð³ãàòè intelligendo prohibere Òîì 16 Âèïóñê 1 2010 ÊȯÂÑÜÊÈÉ ÍÀÖ²ÎÍÀËÜÍÈÉ ÓͲÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒ ³ì. ÒÀÐÀÑÀ ØÅÂ×ÅÍÊÀ ÊÀͲÂÑÜÊÈÉ ÏÐÈÐÎÄÍÈÉ ÇÀÏβÄÍÈÊ Ðåäàêö³éíà êîëåã³ÿ: ïðîô. ä.á.í. Ò.Ë. Àíäð³ºíêî-Ìàëþê, ê.á.í. Â.Ì. Ãðèùåíêî (çàñò. ãîë. ðåäàêòîðà), ïðîô. ä.ã.í. Ì.Ä. Ãðîäçèíñüêèé, ÷ë.-êîð. ÍÀÍÓ ïðîô. ä.á.í. ß.Ï. ijäóõ, ÷ë.-êîð. ÍÀÍÓ ïðîô. ä.á.í. ².Ã. ªìåëüÿíîâ, ïðîô. ä.á.í. ².Þ. Êîñò³êîâ, ÷ë.-êîð. ÓÀÀÍ ïðîô. ä.á.í. Ì.Ì. Ìóñ³ºíêî, ïðîô. ä.ã.í. Î.Ã. Îáîäîâñüêèé, ïðîô. ä.á.í. Â.À. Ñîëîìàõà, ïðîô. ä.ã.í. Â.Â. Ñòåöþê, ïðîô. ä.ã.í. Â.Ê. Õ³ëü÷åâñüêèé, ê.á.í. Ì.Ã. ×îðíèé (ãîë. ðåäàêòîð), ê.á.í. Â.Ë. Øåâ÷èê, àêàä. ÍÀÍÓ ïðîô. ä.á.í. Þ.Ð. Øåëÿã-Ñîñîíêî, ÷ë.-êîð. ÀÏÍ ä.ã.í. Ï.Ã. Øèùåíêî, ïðîô. ä.á.í. Ã.É. Ùåðáàê, ê.á.í. ª.Ä. ßáëîíîâñüêà-Ãðèùåíêî (â³äïîâ. ñåêðåòàð). Êîìï'þòåðíèé ìàêåò ª.Ä. ßáëîíîâñüêà-Ãðèùåíêî, Â.Ì. Ãðèùåíêî Îáêëàäèíêà ª.Ä. ßáëîíîâñüêà-Ãðèùåíêî Àäðåñà ðåäàêö³¿: Address: Êàí³âñüêèé ïðèðîäíèé Kaniv Nature Reserve çàïîâ³äíèê, 19000 Kaniv ì. Êàí³â, Ukraine 19000, ×åðêàñüêà îáë. e-mail: [email protected] http://zsu2.tripod.com/ NATURE RESERVES IN UKRAINE Volume 16 Issue 1 2010 Çàòâåðäæåíî äî äðóêó â÷åíîþ ðàäîþ Êàí³âñüêîãî ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâ³äíèêà (ïðîòîêîë ¹ 4 â³ä 01.06.2010 ð.). Æóðíàë çàðåºñòðîâàíî ̳í³ñòåðñòâîì ³íôîðìàö³¿ Óêðà¿íè. Ðåºñòðàö³éíå ñâ³òîöòâî ÊÂ3014. Âèäàºòüñÿ ç 1995 ð. © "Çàïîâ³äíà ñïðàâà â Óêðà¿í³", 2010 © Êàí³âñüêèé ïðèðîäíèé çàïîâ³äíèê, 2010 © "Nature Reserves in Ukraine", 2010 © Kaniv Nature Reserve, 2010 ÇÀÃÀËÜͲ ÏÈÒÀÍÍß ÇÀÏβÄÍί ÑÏÐÀÂÈ ÅÊÎËÎò×ÍÀ ÌÅÐÅÆÀ ÁÓÊÎÂÈÍÈ Â.Ï. Êîðæèê Áóêîâèíñüêå òîâàðèñòâî ïðèðîäîäîñë³äíèê³â ECONET OF THE BUKOVINA. Korzhyk V.P. - Nature Reserves in Ukraine. 16 (2): 1-9. - Econet idea is changed, because landscape-ecological and historico-geographical approach may be used in its realization. Landscape (geosystem) is the basic block of modern nature-antropogenic environment (socio-natural integrity). Other ecological problems were solved in this integrity. Biotic component is an important regulator of geo(eco)system functioning. Anthropogenic environment complexes are complete constituents of landscape diversity. Description of eco-landscape-net of the Bukovina is based on this approach. Keywords: Bukovina, econet, eco-landscape-net, landscape-ecological approach, historico-geographical approach. ÅÊÎËÎò×ÍÀ ÌÅÐÅÆÀ ÁÓÊÎÂÈÍÈ. Êîðæèê Â.Ï. - Çàïîâ³äíà ñïðàâà â Óêðà¿í³. 16 (2): 1-9. - Êîíöåïö³ÿ ôîðìóâàí- íÿ åêîìåðåæ³ çàçíຠçàêîíîì³ðíèõ çì³í, âèìàãàþ÷è âèêîðèñòàííÿ ëàíäøàôòíî-åêîëîã³÷íîãî òà ³ñòîðèêî-ãåîãðàô³÷íîãî ï³äõîä³â. Âàæëèâèì º âèçíàííÿ ëàíäøàôòó (ãåîñèñòåìè) ÿê îñíîâíî¿ îäèíèö³ äèñêðåòíîñò³ ñó÷àñíîãî ïðèðîäíî-àíòðîïîãåí- íîãî ñåðåäîâèùà (ñîö³îïðèðîäíî¿ ö³ë³ñíîñò³), â ìåæàõ ÿêî¿ âèð³øóþòüñÿ ³íø³ åêîëîã³÷í³ ïðîáëåìè ³ çàâäàííÿ. Á³îòè÷íîìó êîìïîíåíòó â³äâîäèòüñÿ ðîëü âàæëèâîãî ðåãóëÿòîðà ìåõàí³çìó ïîòî÷íîãî ôóíêö³îíóâàííÿ ãåî(åêî)ñèñòåì. Íåîáõ³äíå òàêîæ óðàõóâàííÿ àíòðîï³÷íèõ êîìïëåêñ³â ÿê ïîâíîö³ííèõ ñêëàäîâèõ ëàíäøàôòíîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ. Íà îñíîâ³ öüîãî ï³äõîäó îïèñàí³ åëåìåíòè åêîëàíäøàôòíî¿ ìåðåæ³ Áóêîâèíè. Êëþ÷îâ³ ñëîâà: Áóêîâèíà, åêîìåðåæà, åêîëàíäøàôòíà ìåðåæà, ëàíäøàôòíî-åêîëîã³÷íèé ï³äõ³ä, ³ñòîðèêî-ãåîãðàô³÷íèé ï³äõ³ä. ÝÊÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÑÅÒÜ ÁÓÊÎÂÈÍÛ. Êîðæèê Â.Ï. - Çàïîâ³äíà ñïðàâà â Óêðà¿í³. 16 (2): 1-9. - Êîíöåïöèÿ ôîðìèðî- âàíèÿ ýêîñåòè çàêîíîìåðíî èçìåíÿåòñÿ, ÷òî òðåáóåò èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ ëàíäøàôòíî-ýêîëîãè÷åñêîãî è èñòîðèêî-ãåîãðàôè÷åñêîãî ïîäõîäîâ. Âàæíî ïðèçíàòü ëàíäøàôò (ãåîñèñòåìó) îñíîâíîé åäèíèöåé äèñêðåòíîñòè ñîâðåìåííîé ïðèðîäíî-àíòðîïîãåí- íîé ñðåäû (ñîöèîïðèðîäíîé öåëîñòíîñòè), â ïðåäåëàõ êîòîðîé è ðåøàþòñÿ èíûå ýêîëîãè÷åñêèå ïðîáëåìû è çàäà÷è. Áèîòè÷åñ- êîìó êîìïîíåíòó îòâîäèòñÿ ðîëü âàæíîãî ðåãóëÿòîðà ìåõàíèçìà òåêóùåãî ôóíêöèîíèðîâàíèÿ ãåî(ýêî)ñèñòåì. Íåîáõîäè- ìî òàêæå ó÷èòûâàòü àíòðîïè÷åñêèå êîìïëåêñû êàê ïîëíîöåííûå ñîñòàâëÿþùèå ëàíäøàôòíîãî ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ. Èìåííî íà îñíîâå ýòîãî ïîäõîäà îïèñàíû ýëåìåíòû ýêîëàíäøàôòíîé ñåòè Áóêîâèíû. Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: Áóêîâèíà, ýêîëîãè÷åñêàÿ ñåòü, ýêîëàíäøàôòíàÿ ñåòü, ëàíäøàôòíî-ýêîëîãè÷åñêèé ïîäõîä, èñòîðèêî- ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèé ïîäõîä. Ðîçøèðåííÿ ìåðåæ³ îáºêò³â ïðèðîäíî-çàïîâ³äíîãî õ³äí³ñòü ïåðøî÷åðãîâîãî çáåðåæåííÿ á³îòè÷íîãî ð³çíî- ôîíäó (ÎÏÇÔ) òà ôîðìóâàííÿ êàðêàñíî¿ ñåðåäîâèùî- ìàí³òòÿ, â òîé ÷àñ ÿê á³ëüø âàæëèâà ïðîáëåìà çáåðåæåííÿ ï³äòðèìóþ÷î¿ ìåðåæ³ º îäíèì ³ç íàé䳺â³øèõ ³ íàéåêîíî- áàçîâîãî (ëàíäøàôòíîãî) áóëà â³äñóíóòà íà äðóãèé ïëàí. ì³÷í³øèõ çàõîä³â â àñïåêò³ îïòèì³çàö³¿ ïðèðîäîêîðèñòó- Äîì³íóâàííÿ á³îòè÷íîãî ï³äõîäó äî ôîðìóâàííÿ åêîìå- âàííÿ ³ çáåðåæåííÿ ëàíäøàôòíîãî òà ïîõ³äíîãî â³ä íüîãî ðåæ³, ÿê äàíèíà äàâí³é ³ õèáí³é òðàäèö³¿ ââàæàòè ï³ä îõîðî- á³îòè÷íîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ. Öå ïîÿñíþºòüñÿ òèì, ùî ïðè íîþ ïðèðîäè îõîðîíó òàê çâàíî¿ æèâî¿ ïðèðîäè, ïðè- îáìåæåíí³ àêòèâíî¿ ãîñïîäàðñüêî¿ ä³ÿëüíîñò³ õî÷à á íà çâåëî äî ïåâíî¿ ìîíîïîë³çàö³¿ ñïðàâè ñïåö³àë³ñòàìè-á³î- 30 % òåðèòî𳿠ëàíäøàôò³â ó ¿õ êëþ÷îâèõ ñèñòåìîóòâîðþ- ëîãàìè, ùî â Óêðà¿í³ çíàéøëî ñâîº â³äîáðàæåííÿ íàâ³òü þ÷èõ ä³ëÿíêàõ âîíè çäàòí³ äî ñàìîâ³äíîâëåííÿ é ïîäàëü- ó çàêîíîäàâ÷èõ äîêóìåíòàõ (Çàêîí Óêðà¿íè , 2000; òà øîãî ñàìîðîçâèòêó áåç íåãàòèâíèõ äëÿ ëþäèíè íàñë³äê³â. ³í.) ³ ê³ëüêîõ ïîñë³äîâíèõ ïðîåêòàõ Ìåòîäè÷íèõ âêàç³âîê Ç âè÷åðïàííÿì ìîæëèâîñòåé ðîçøèðåííÿ òåðèòîð³- ïî ñòâîðåííþ íàö³îíàëüíî¿ åêîìåðåæ³, ðîçðîáëåíèõ îê- àëüíèõ ðåñóðñ³â çàïîâ³äíîñò³, ÿê êîíöåïö³¿ çáåðåæåííÿ ðåìèìè ñïåö³àë³ñòàìè Íàö³îíàëüíîãî Åêîöåíòðó Óêðà¿- âèáðàíèõ ä³ëÿíîê äîâê³ëëÿ, âèùèì ³ çàêîíîì³ðíèì ³ñòî- íè ³ ̳í³ñòåðñòâà åêîëî㳿 òà ïðèðîäíèõ ðåñóðñ³â (íèí³ ðè÷íèì åòàïîì ó ðîçâèòêó ïðèðîäíî-çàïîâ³äíî¿ ñïðà- ̳íïðèðîäè) Óêðà¿íè. Á³îòè÷íèé ï³äõ³ä ïðåâàëþº ³ â ³í- âè (ÏÇÑ), ÿêà â íèí³øíüîìó ¿¿ ðîçóì³íí³ ³ òðàêòóâàíí³ øèõ ïóáë³êàö³ÿõ (Ôîðìóâàííÿ , 2004; Øåëÿã-Ñîñîíêî âè÷åðïàëà ñâ³é êðåàòèâíèé ïîòåíö³àë ³ äàâíî ïîòðåáóº è äð., 2004). äîêîð³ííèõ çì³í, ïîñòຠêîíöåïö³ÿ ôîðìóâàííÿ åêîìå- Ïðîâåäåíà íàòóðíà àïðîáàö³ÿ ìåòîäèê íà êîíêðåòíî- ðåæ³, îñê³ëüêè ÷èñòî ïðèðîäíèõ ÷è óìîâíî ïðèðîäíèõ ìó ðåã³îíàëüíîìó ïîë³ãîí³ ×åðí³âåöüêî¿ îáëàñò³ â êîí- ä³ëÿíîê äîâê³ëëÿ ïðàêòè÷íî íå çáåðåãëîñü. Òðåáà ôîð- òåêñò³ ïðîåêòó ϳäòðèìêà ðîçâèòêó Íàö³îíàëüíî¿ åêîëî- ìóâàòè é óòðèìóâàòè íîâå ñåðåäîâèùå, íàéêðàùå àäàï- ã³÷íî¿ ìåðåæ³ Óêðà¿íè ó ðàìêàõ ôîðìóâàííÿ Âñåºâðî- òîâàíå äî ñó÷àñíèõ êë³ìàòè÷íî-àíòðîïîãåííèõ óìîâ ïåéñüêî¿ åêîëîã³÷íî¿ ìåðåæ³. Çàäóì òà âò³ëåííÿ â ï³ëîòí³é (Êîðæèê, 2004, 2006à). çîí³ ó 2004 ð., â ÿêîìó áðàâ ó÷àñòü ³ àâòîð öèõ ðÿäê³â, äîâåëà, ùî çàñòîñóâàííÿ ñóòî á³îòè÷íîãî ï³äõîäó çíà÷- Ñòàí ïðîáëåìè íî çâóæóº ïîòåíö³éí³ òà ðåàëüí³ ìîæëèâîñò³ äåêëàðîâà- Êîíöåïö³ÿ ôîðìóâàííÿ åêîìåðåæ³ çàçíຠçàêîíîì³ð- íèõ íàìàãàíü çáåðåãòè åêîëîã³÷íó ñòàá³ëüí³ñòü äîâê³ëëÿ. íèõ çì³í. Ïîïåðâàõ çà îñíîâó ðîçðîáêè ìåòîäîëî㳿 òà Ç ïðè÷èí àìîðôíîñò³, íåâèçíà÷åíîñò³ ³ ñï³ðíîñò³ îñíîâ- ìåòîäèêè ñòâîðåííÿ åêîìåðåæ³ áóëà ïîêëàäåíà íåîá- íèõ ïîíÿòü (ÿäðî, êîðèäîð, çîíà â³äíîâëåííÿ) ñòâîðþºòü- Çàïîâ³äíà ñïðàâà â Óêðà¿í³. Òîì 16. Âèïóñê 1. 2010. ñÿ ÷èìàëî þðèäè÷íî-ïðàâîâèõ, ìåíòàëüíèõ, çåìëåâïî- ìåðåæ³ ç âèêîðèñòàííÿì âèä³ëåíèõ íà ¿¿ ï³äñòàâ³ ïàðàäè- ðÿäêóâàëüíèõ òà ô³íàíñîâèõ ïðîáëåì, ùî óíåìîæëèâëþ- íàì³÷íî¿, ïàðàãåíåòè÷íî¿ òà á³îöåíòðè÷íî-ñ³òüîâî¿ ëàíä- þòü ïðàêòè÷íó ðåàë³çàö³þ åêîìåðåæ³. Òîìó ñóòî á³îòè÷- øàôòíî¿ ñòðóêòóð. Öå äîçâîëÿº ïîçáóòèñü ³ëþç³é á³îòè÷- íà âåðñ³ÿ íå ìîæå áóòè ïðèéíÿòà çà îñíîâó ³ ñëóãóâàòè íî¿ íåçàëåæíîñò³ åêîìåðåæ³ ³ âïîðÿäêóâàòè êðèòå𳿠䳺âèì ³íñòðóìåíòîì ó çàáåçïå÷åíí³ çáàëàíñîâàíîãî âèä³ëåííÿ ¿¿ åëåìåíò³â. ðîçâèòêó â éîãî åêîëîã³÷íîìó àñïåêò³. 2. Äåô³í³ö³ÿ ëàíäøàôòíîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ ³ âèçíà- Ïîøèðåííÿ ïîñòíåêëàñè÷íî¿ ìåòîäîëî㳿 ó ïðèðîä- ÷åííÿ éîãî êðèòåð³¿â. Ìຠïðèíàéìí³ äâà àñïåêòè: òåîðå- íè÷èõ íàóêàõ ùå ðàç ï³äòâåðäæóº íåîáõ³äí³ñòü çàñòîñó- òè÷íèé òà ïðàãìàòè÷íèé. Âèçíà÷åííÿ ñóòíîñò³ ñóòî ëàíä- âàííÿ ó ÏÇÑ ëàíäøàôòíî-åêîëîã³÷íîãî òà ³ñòîðèêî- øàôòíîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ, ÿê ³ñòîðè÷íî óòâîðåíîãî ïîºä- ãåîãðàô³÷íîãî ï³äõîä³â (ùî ïîçáàâëÿº ¿¿ âàä îäíîá³÷íî- íàííÿ ³íâàð³àíòíîãî òà âàð³àíòíîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ, äîñòàò- ãî âóçüêîêîìïîíåíòíîãî êëàñè÷íîãî á³îåêîëîã³÷íîãî íüî ïîâíî é îáãðóíòîâàíî íàâåäåíî ó ïðàöÿõ â³ò÷èçíÿ- òðàêòóâàííÿ ðåàë³é äîâê³ëëÿ), çì³í ïðèíöèï³â ¿¿ ðîçâèò- íèõ ëàíäøàôòîçíàâö³â. Âîäíî÷àñ ñïðàâåäëèâî çàóâàæó- êó (×îðíåé òà ³í., 2001; Êîðæèê, 2004, 2006à). Çà óìîâ ºòüñÿ, ùî ñàìå ïîíÿòòÿ ëàíäøàôòíå ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ ìຠïðîãðåñóþ÷î¿ òîòàëüíî¿ àíòðîïîãåííî¿ òðàíñôîðìàö³¿ ùîíàéìåíøå ÷îòèðè ð³çíèõ òëóìà÷åííÿ: òðàäèö³éíî- ëàíäøàôòíî¿ îáîëîíêè ïðèðîäíè÷³ñòü ïðèðîäíèõ ëàíäøàôòíå (ãåîêîìïëåêñíå), àíòðîï³÷íå, á³îöåíòðè÷- îáºêò³â òà ãåîñèñòåì ñòຠ³ëþçîðíîþ, à ñïðîáè îáãðóí- íå òà ãóìàí³ñòè÷íå; íà áàç³ ãóìàí³ñòè÷íîãî ãðóíòóºòüñÿ òóâàòè ï³äõîäè ó ïðèðîäîêîðèñòóâàíí³ ç ïîçèö³é çáåðå- ªâðîïåéñüêà ëàíäøàôòíà Êîíâåíö³ÿ. Ó ðàìêàõ îñòàí- æåííÿ ïðàâ òàê çâàíî¿ äèêî¿ ïðèðîäè (âèñë³â çà Â.ª. íüî¿ âèçíàºòüñÿ, ùî ëþäèíà ìຠäåÿêó îïòèìàëüíó ìåæó Áîðåéêîì) â³ääàþòü ì³ôîëî㳺þ. Íàìàãàííÿ çàêîíñåðâó- ñïðèéíÿòòÿ ð³çíîìàí³òíîñò³ ëàíäøàôòó, âèùå ³ íèæ÷å âàòè ä³ëÿíêè ëàíäøàôò³â ó ïåðâ³ñíîìó íåçàéìàíîìó ÿêî¿ ïî÷óâຠñåáå äèñêîìôîðòíî. Êîæíèé ³ç öèõ ï³äõîä³â âèãëÿä³ çàâæäè íàøòîâõóþòüñÿ íà çàêîíîì³ðí³ ïèòàííÿ: ìຠïåâí³ ïåðåâàãè òà íåäîë³êè, ïðîòå íà ñüîãîäí³ ºäèíà à ÿêèì â³í º, îòîé ïåðâ³ñíèé âèãëÿä, ñòðóêòóðà ³ ïàðàìåò- ÷³òêî âèçíà÷åíà êîíöåïö³ÿ ïîêè ùî â³äñóòíÿ. ðè ëàíäøàôòó ï³ñëÿ ê³ëüêîõ òèñÿ÷îë³òü àêòèâíîãî ïåðåáó- Ïðàãìàòè÷íèé àñïåêò çáåðåæåííÿ âèìàãຠ÷³òêîãî âàííÿ â íüîìó ëþäèíè, ÿêîìó ïåð³îäó ãîëîöåíó â³í â³äïî- âèçíà÷åííÿ êðèòåð³¿â äèñêðåòèçàö³¿ ãåîêîìïëåêñ³â ³ óòâî- â³äàº, ÿêîãî òèïó é îáºìó ïîâèíí³ áóòè çàõîäè ïî êîíñåð- ðþþ÷èõ ¿õ êîìïîíåíò³â òà åëåìåíò³â, ÿê³ ðåïðåçåíòóþòü âàö³¿ öèõ ðåë³êò³â ìèíóëèõ ëàíäøàôòíî-êë³ìàòè÷íèõ åïîõ íåîáõ³äíèé, õàðàêòåðíèé äëÿ êîíêðåòíîãî ðåã³îíó ñïåêòð ç îãëÿäó íà òðåíä åâîëþö³¿ ñîö³îïðèðîäíî¿ ö³ë³ñíîñò³ é, ëàíäøàôòíîãî ð³çíîìàí³òòÿ ³ âèçíà÷àþòü ïðàêòè÷íèé íàðåøò³, ÿê³ åêîëîã³÷í³ ôóíêö³¿ â íèí³øíüîìó ñåðåäîâè- ñåíñ ö³º¿ ñïðàâè.
Recommended publications
  • Shooting Locations Guide Ukraine Contents
    SHOOTING LOCATIONS GUIDE UKRAINE CONTENTS Cherkasy Oblast ........................................... 3 Chernihiv Oblast .......................................... 6 Chernivtsi Oblast .......................................... 9 Dnipro Oblast ............................................... 11 Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast ................................ 12 Kharkiv Oblast .............................................. 15 Kherson Oblast ............................................. 17 Khmelnytskyi Oblast .................................... 20 Kyiv Oblast .................................................... 22 Lviv Oblast ..................................................... 27 Mykolaiv Oblast ............................................ 31 Odesa Oblast ................................................ 33 Poltava Oblast ............................................... 35 Rivne Oblast ................................................ 36 Sumy Oblast ................................................ 38 Vinnytsia Oblast ............................................ 40 Volyn Oblast ................................................ 41 Zakarpattia Oblast ........................................ 43 Zaporizhzhia Oblast ..................................... 46 Zhytomyr Oblast ........................................... 48 Ternopil Oblast ............................................. 49 — Nature reserve — Biosphere reserve — Industry building — National park — Historical and cultural reserve CHERKASY OBLAST Local authorities Cherkasy city Council 36 Baidy Vyshnevetskoho
    [Show full text]
  • Hibernacula of Barbastella Barbastellus in Ukraine: Distribution and Some Ecological Aspects
    Vespertilio 16: 55–68, 2012 ISSN 1213-6123 Hibernacula of Barbastella barbastellus in Ukraine: distribution and some ecological aspects Andriy-Taras BASHTA Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, Kozelnytska 4, Lviv 79026, Ukraine; atbashta@gmail. com Abstract. The paper presents a study regarding the winter aggregations of the barbastelle bat (Barbastella barbastellus) in western Ukraine, based on data collected in natural underground spaces and artificial structures (abandoned mines, ancient monuments, military fortifications, etc.). Some parameters including the size and dynamics of winter aggregations, as well as microclimate conditions of hibernacula were investigated. The most numerous barbastelle hibernaculum has been found in the Tarakaniv fortress (Rivne region); the largest aggregation of the species consisted of ca. 950 individuals. The numbers of barbastelles in Ukraine seem stable or even increasing. In Central Europe the species is not threatened as seriously as it is in Western Europe. Distribution, hibernation, winter aggregations, conservation Introduction The barbastelle bat, Barbastella barbastellus (Schreber, 1774), is a Palearctic bat species. Its range stretches from the northern Morocco to Iran and from southern Scandinavia and Latvia to Greece (Wołoszyn & Bashta 2009). In Ukraine, the barbastelle is found from the western borders to the Dnieper river. The majority of records come from the western part of Ukraine and the Crimean Mts. (Kovalyova & Taraborkin 2001, Bashta & Potish 2007, Bashta 2009). The last assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Records of Range Dynamics in Ground Squirrels and Geographical Barriers in the Pleistocene of the Circum-Black Sea Area
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery ‘Good fences make good neighbours’: Concepts and records of range dynamics in ground squirrels and geographical barriers in the Pleistocene of the Circum-Black Sea area L.V. Popova, L.C. Maul, V. Zagorodniuk, Yu.M. Veklych, P.S. Shydlovskiy, N.V. Pogodina, K.M. Bondar, T.V. Strukova, S.A. Parfitt Quaternary International 509 (2019) 103–120 Abstract Ground squirrels were an important member of the Pleistocene steppe-tundra mammal community. They evolved ecological specialisations and exhibit behaviours that make them particularly informative subjects to study palaeoenvironmental constraints affecting species distribution and speciation. Interspecific competition and isolating geographical barriers are considered as the principal factors that define species range boundaries. The present paper provides a first comprehensive compilation of the living and extinct Spermophilus species in Europe. These data suggest ‘patchwork quilt’ model for the expansion and spatial distribution of ground squirrel species. Here we consider mainly small-sized Spermophilus species because large-sized (e.g., S. superciliosus) ground squirrels consist another ‘patchwork quilt’, which overlap the first one. This overlapping of the species ranges is possible because of the size difference that lowers interspecific competition (Hutchinson's rule). We consider two main types of range boundaries. One type includes roughly ‘sub-parallel’ boundaries that oscillate in concert with climatic and vegetational changes (a case of climatically controlled competitive exclusion). The other type consists of roughly ‘sub-meridional’ boundaries corresponding to geographical barriers (e.g., water barriers, mountain ridges); these boundaries are rather stable.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Ridei I In
    Wiad. entomol. 26 (4): 237-249 Poznań 2007 National Ecological Network of Ukraine and the state of research on odonatofauna in protected territories Narodowa Sieć Ekologiczna Ukrainy i stan badań nad odonatofauną obszarów chronionych NATALIA RIDEI 1, LYUDMYLA KHROKALO 1, INNA PAVLUSENKO 2 1 Education and Research Institute of Nature Protection and Biotechnologies, National Agri- cultural University of Ukraine, prov. Sils'kogospodars'ky 4 korp. 17, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Schmal'gausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Sciences, Bogdan Khmel'nyts'kii str. 15, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: An analysis of Odonata check-lists of protected species and territories of na- tional and international significance have been carried out within the framework of a biodiversity data base of Ukrainian National Ecological Network’s key areas. Summarised and updated information on 11 protected areas is reported. For five natural reserves, such as “Ielanetskyi steppe”, “Kazantyp”, “Cheremskyi” and “Karadagskyi” Nature Reserves and one branch of Ukrainian Steppe Reserve the check-lists of dragonflies are presented for the first time. KEY WORDS: Odonata, Ukraine, National Ecological Network, protected territories. Introduction While occupying less than 6% of the European area, Ukraine holds ap- proximately 35% of its biological diversity due to its location at the junction of various natural zones and the crossing of animals’ and plants’ migration paths. A relatively small surface area contains four natural zones: broad-le- aved woodlands, a forest-steppe, a steppe, and Mediterranean zones. The least transformed natural landscapes are represented on nearly 25% of all the Ukrainian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 National Report of Parties on the Implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
    UNEP/CMS/COP11/Inf.20.3.UA 2014 NATIONAL REPORT OF PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS The deadline for submission of the reports is 1 May 2014. The reporting period is 15 June 2011 to 1 May 2014. Parties are encouraged to respond to all questions. Parties are also requested to provide comprehensive answers, including, where appropriate, a summary of activities, information on factors limiting action and details of any assistance required. Reporting format agreed by the Standing Committee at its 40th Meeting (Bonn, November 2012) for mandatory use by Parties, for reports submitted to the Eleventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP11) 2014. The questions below combine elements of Resolution 4.1 (Party Reports) adopted by the Fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Nairobi, June 1994) and Resolution 6.4 (Strategic Plan for the Convention on Migratory Species 2000-2005), adopted by the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Cape Town, November 1999), the COP8 Strategic Plan 2006-2011 and Resolution 8.24 adopted by the Conference of the Parties (Nairobi 2005), as well as commitments arising from other operational Resolutions and Recommendations of the Conference of the Parties. COP Resolution 9.4 adopted at Rome called upon the Secretariats and Parties of CMS Agreements to collaborate in the implementation and harmonization of online reporting implementation. The CMS Family Online Reporting System (ORS) has been successfully implemented and used by AEWA in their last Meeting of the Parties (MOP 5, 2012) reporting cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenophytes in Different Forest Types of Ukraine
    18/2 • 2019, 289–312 DOI: 10.2478/hacq-2018-0013 Kenophytes in different forest types of Ukraine Viktor Onyshchenko1 Key words: forest, vegetation, Abstract alien plants, kenophytes, invasion, The article aims to 1) describe the distribution of non-native species of vascular habitats. plants (only kenophytes, i. e. naturalized species introduced after the 15th cen- tury) in different types of forests and different biogeographical regions of Ukraine; Ključne besede: gozd, vegetacija, 2) compare proportions of kenophytes in forests of different areas; 3) detect statis- tujerodne rastline, kenofiti, invazija, tically significant changes in the occurrence of kenophytes over the last 80 years. habitati. The material consists of 2701 relevés sampled in 1990‒2018. They were taken from Ukrainian phytocoenological publications and databases. In Ukraine, as in other European countries, the highest proportion of kenophytes (percentage of species number per relevé) is in floodplain forests (up to 9.1% in willow and pop- lar forests). The lowest proportion is characteristic for bog woods (0%) and most types of mountain forests. Among biogeographical regions, the highest values were found in the flatland areas of the Steppic region and the forest-steppe part of the Continental region. The most frequent species are Impatiens parviflora (predomi- nantly in broadleaved woods, absent in relevés from the steppic biogeoregion) and Erigeron canadensis (pine woods on sand). Comparison with 1466 older relevés sampled in 1950–1989 allows us to make a conclusion that the proportion of kenophytes increased at least in one habitat type (oak-hornbeam forests). Izvleček V članku smo želeli 1) opisati razširjenost tujerodnih rastlinskih vrst (samo keno- fitov, to je naturaliziranih vrst, ki so se pojavile po 15.
    [Show full text]