Voters Guide 06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voters Guide 06 2006 Judicial oter Guide Iowa Retention Elections Voter Information: Answers to Questions about Retention Elections Biographies of Judges on the 2006 Iowa Ballot Prepared by the Iowa Judicial Branch, September 2006, as a public service. Table of Contents About Judicial Retention Elections Biographies of Judges Standing for Retention Iowa Court of Appeals...page 5 1st Judicial District...page 6 2nd Judicial District...page 11 3rd Judicial District...page 15 4th Judicial District...page 18 5th Judicial District...page 20 6th Judicial District...page 26 7th Judicial District...page 29 8th Judicial District...page 34 Retention Election Q & A What makes a good judge? Is there a judicial performance evalua- tion? √ Integrity-honest, upright and committed to the rule of law Yes. The Iowa State Bar Association "Judicial √ Professional Competence-keen intellect, Plebiscite" evaluates each judge on the ballot on a extensive legal knowledge and strong writing abilities wide range of attributes. The results of this evalua- √ Judicial Temperament-neutral, decisive, tion are available online one month prior to the respectful and composed general election at www.iowabar.org √ Experience-strong record of professional excellence How do I find a decision or ruling? √ Service-committed to public service and the administration of justice The published decisions of the Iowa Supreme Court and Iowa Court of Appeals are readily available What about a judge's personal views? online at www.judicial.state.ia.us and in libraries in books called the Northwestern Reporter 2nd. These It is appropriate for legislators and the governor to decisions usually represent the view of the majority consider public opinion and the views of special of judges on the court, not solely the view of the interest groups when passing laws and adopting judge writing for the majority. A judge who dis- public policy. But judges have different consider- agrees with the majority view will indicate his or her ations. disagreement by a written dissent. √ It is not appropriate for a judge to consider Locating a ruling of a trial court judge is a more his or her personal views or public opinion when difficult task because of the high volume of cases. deciding cases. Judges must be neutral and follow But if you know the name of the case or the case the rule of law. number you can ask the local clerk of court for a copy of a ruling. √ A judge has a First Amendment right to free speech. But if a judge announces a position on an issue, the judge's impartiality may be called into question and the judge may have to decline handling cases involving that issue. √ Judicial ethics prohibit judges from comment- ing about cases pending in court. This ensures that litigants receive a fair trial. Retention Election Q & A What about an unpopular court decision? What is a judicial retention election? For the following reasons, a voter may want to Judges stand for retention election near the end of consider more than the outcome of one case when their term of office. In a retention election, judges assessing a judge’s performance. do not have opponents. Instead, voters decide whether or not to retain a judge in office. If a judge √ Judges must follow the rule of law and receives a simple majority of "yes" votes, the judge sometimes this leads to unpopular results. Under may serve another full term. The regular term of the rule of law, judicial decisions are based strictly office for a supreme court justice is eight years; the upon the evidence presented to the court and the term for all other judges is six years. applicable laws set out in our statutes and constitu- tion. Why does Iowa use judicial retention? √ If citizens disagree with a law or a judge's In 1962, Iowa voters approved a constitutional interpretation of a law, they can petition the legisla- reform that replaced the process of selecting judges ture to change the law. by popular vote with a merit selection and retention election process. This process promotes selection √ Over the course of a career a judge will of the best qualified applicants and ensures an dispose of thousands of cases. One case alone is impartial judiciary while retaining judicial account- not necessarily an accurate barometer of a judicial ability. career. √ High-profile cases that catch the media's ..... attention often bear little resemblance to the cases that constitute the bulk of a judge's work. Most court cases do not involve hot-button issues. (Return to Table of Contents) √ Sometimes a higher court reverses the deci- sion of a lower court. Reversal by a higher court does not in itself indicate the quality of a judge's work. Reversal could be for any number of reasons. For instance, the higher court could be ruling on an issue for the first time or the higher court could be clarifying its earlier opinions that served as prece- dents for lower court. "Judges are not politicians who can promise to do certain things in exchange for votes.” Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court Iowa Court of Appeals Van D. Zimmer, Vinton John C. Miller, Burlington Anuradha Vaitheswaran, Des Moines Date of Appointment: 1999 Date of Appointment: 1999 Date of Appointment: 1999. Education Education Education BA, University of Iowa, 1969; JD, BA, University of Iowa, 1969; JD, BA, Grinnell College, 1980; JD and University of Iowa, 1972 University of Iowa, 1975 MA in political science from 1975 to 1980, University of Iowa, 1984 Career Career Following graduation from law From 1975 to 1980, he was in private Career school, Judge Zimmer served as an practice and then was a trust officer Judge Vaitheswaran was a law clerk officer in the United States Army. before being appointed to the district to Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Iowa After completing his tour of duty in court bench. Judge Miller served as a Supreme Court, before Wolle's 1973, he served as an assistant district judge in the Eight Judicial appointment to the federal district county attorney for Linn County and District for eighteen years and held court. She worked as an attorney an adjunct college instructor. Judge the position of chief judge from July with Legal Services Corporation of Zimmer later served as an area 1998 until his appointment to the Iowa and with the Attorney prosecutor for the Iowa Attorney appellate court. General's office before her appoint- General's Office and as assistant ment to the appellate court. United States attorney for the Professional Activities Northern District of Iowa. He was He is a member of the Des Moines Professional Activities also a member of a private law firm County, Iowa State, and American Judge Vaitheswaran is a member of in Vinton before serving as a district Bar Associations. the Polk County and Iowa State Bar court judge in the Sixth Judicial Associations, the Polk County District for 13 years. Women Attorneys and Iowa Judges Associations, and the C. Edwin Professional Activities Moore Inn of Court. Judge Zimmer currently serves as chair of the Iowa Judges Association's Court and Community Committee. Since 1992, he has (Return to Table of Contents) served as assistant for the State of Iowa's Annual New Judge Orienta- tion Program. "Although it may be appropriate for politicians to consider public opinion and the views of special interest groups when drafting laws and regulations, it is never ap- propriate for judges to do so when deciding cases. Judges are accountable to the Constitution and the law, and in this way judges are always accountable to the people." former Chief Justice Louis A. Lavorato, Iowa Supreme Court District 1A --District Court Judges Monica Ackley, Dubuque John J. Bauercamper, Waukon Margaret Lingreen, Postville Date of Appointment: 2003 Date of Appointment: 1986 Date of Appointment: 1991 Education Education Education BA, University of San Diego, 1986; BA, University of Northern Iowa, BA, Drake University, 1974; JD, JD, University of San Diego, 1990. 1970; JD, University of Minnesota, Drake University, 1977. 1973. Career Career Judge Ackley worked as a law clerk Career Judge Lingreen practiced law with a and research assistant before going Judge Bauercamper practiced law private firm and served as assistant into private practice. She also privately, as well as serving as Allamakee County attorney from served as a magistrate judge begin- Allamakee County attorney and 1979 to 1991. ning in 1997. juvenile court referee. Professional Activities Professional Activities Professional Activities She is a member of the Iowa State She is a member of the Dubuque He belongs to the Iowa Judges Bar Association and the Iowa Judges County, Iowa State, and California Association, the Allamakee County, Association. Bar Associations. Iowa State, and Minnesota State Bar Associations. "I think it's vitally important that [judicial] nominees, to use Justice Ginsburg's words, "no hints, no forecasts, no previews." Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court, speaking at his confirmation hearing District 1A --District Associate Judges Randal J. Nigg, Dubuque Date of Appointment: 1989 Education BA, Loras College, 1971; JD, Univer- sity of San Diego, 1974. Career Practiced law in Dubuque for 15 years prior to his appointment to the bench. While in private practice he served on numerous civic boards and organizations. Professional Activities He serves on the Criminal Law and Rules Review Committee, the Courts & Community Committee, and the District Associate Judge Committee of the Iowa Judges Association and is a member of the Iowa State Bar and American Judicature Society. "So be wary of judicial candidates who take positions on issues, because they cannot deliver on their promises. Answers to issues questionnaires or any campaign prom- ises are not likely to tell you anything useful about how a judge will decide a case, or whether a judge will be able to sit on a case." Chief Justice Michael Wolff, Missouri Supreme Court District 1B --District Court Judges K.D.
Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of Iowa ______
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA _____________________________________________________________ STATE OF IOWA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) v. ) S.CT. NO. 19-0451 ) DAVID LEE STAAKE, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) _____________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR FAYETTE COUNTY HONORABLE RICHARD D. STOCHL, JUDGE ____________________________________________________________ APPELLANT'S BRIEF AND ARGUMENT _____________________________________________________________ SHELLIE L. KNIPFER Assistant Appellate Defender [email protected] [email protected] STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE Fourth Floor Lucas Building Des Moines, Iowa 50319 (515) 281-8841 / (515) 281-7281 FAX ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT FINAL ELECTRONICALLY FILED OCT 28, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On the 28th day of October, 2019, the undersigned certifies that a true copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon Defendant-Appellant by placing one copy thereof in the United States mail, proper postage attached, addressed to David L. Staake, 123 5th Str. N.W., Olwein, IA 50662. APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE /s/ Shellie L. Knipfer SHELLIE L. KNIPFER Assistant Appellate Defender Appellate Defender Office Lucas Bldg., 4th Floor 321 E. 12th Street Des Moines, IA 50319 (515) 281-8841 [email protected] [email protected] SLK/sm/7/19 SLK/sm/10/19 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Certificate of Service ....................................................... 2 Table of Authorities
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Judicial Performance Review
    2016 Judicial Performance Review Prepared by The Iowa State Bar Association Table of Contents Judicial Performance Review Information....................................................................................................3 Judicial Performance Review Q&A...............................................................................................................4 Judicial Biographies.....................................................................................................................................6 Judicial Performance Review Results Iowa Supreme Court..................................................................................................................................22 Iowa Court of Appeals...............................................................................................................................23 District 1A.................................................................................................................................................24 Allamakee, Clayton, Delaware, Dubuque, Winneshiek Counties District 1B.................................................................................................................................................25 Black Hawk, Buchanan, Chickasaw, Fayette, Grundy, Howard Counties District 2A.................................................................................................................................................26 Bremer, Butler, Cerro Gordo, Floyd, Franklin, Hancock, Mitchell, Winnebago, Worth Counties
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Iowa Supreme Court in the Matter of Lessons Learned ) From
    In the Iowa Supreme Court In the Matter of Lessons Learned ) From the Judicial Branch Response ) April 28, 2021 To COVID-19 ) Beginning in early March 2020, the judicial branch was preparing to minimize the impact of COVID-19 on the services it provides to Iowans. In the span of just a few weeks, the planning effort transitioned into the need for immediate actions. As the pandemic worsened and more information about the virus became available, the Iowa Supreme Court issued orders to protect the public and court employees while keeping the courts as open and operational as possible. Between March 12 and November 24, nearly thirty supervisory orders were issued. As the judicial branch begins to plan for a post COVID-19 world, it seeks to review the formal orders and informal policies or practices adopted by the branch in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The supreme court establishes the Lessons Learned Task Force to make recommendations to the supreme court on rules, polices or practices that should be retained, modified or stopped. The recommendations shall be submitted to the supreme court by June 4, 2021. The following individuals are appointed to the Task Force: Honorable Susan Christensen, Chief Justice, Iowa Supreme Court, Harlan, chair Honorable Kellyann Lekar, Chief Judge, First Judicial District, Waterloo Honorable David Porter, District Judge, Des Moines Honorable Russell Keast, District Associate Judge, Cedar Rapids Steve Bradford, corporate counsel, Muscatine 1 Carrington Buze, Children’s Justice, Des Moines Guy Cook, private
    [Show full text]
  • Reasonable Efforts: a Judicial Perspective
    REASONABLE EFFORTS: A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE By Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.)1 .INTRODUCTION The term “reasonable efforts” challenges and confounds many in our juvenile dependency and family courts across the country.2 Judges hear about it in their judicial trainings, read about it now and then in publications, sign their names to court orders finding that the children’s services agency (“agency”) made “reasonable efforts” on a daily basis, and on occasion make “no reasonable efforts” findings. Yet attorneys rarely refer to reasonable efforts in court, and most judges approve of what the agency has done with little or no thought about it.3 The law requires judges to make these findings, and good reasons exist to do so. By making the reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings the court informs the parties, the children’s services agency, and the federal government that the agency is or is not meeting its legal responsibilities. By monitoring the agency’s actions the court ensures that the agency has complied with its legal obligation to provide services to prevent the child’s removal from parental care, assist the family safely to reunify with its child, and make certain to finalize a permanent plan for the child. The reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings are the most powerful tools juvenile court judges have at their disposal in dependency cases, and attorneys and judges should pay special attention to them to ensure that the 1 Judge Edwards is a retired judge now working as a consultant to juvenile courts in California and other states. The author is indebted to many people for the research and information contained in this booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Courts at a Glance
    Courts at a Glance For Everyone From Students to Seniors Published by Iowa Judicial Branch Branches of American Government Separation of Powers The governmental system of the United States uses separation of powers. This means that the government has separate branches that deal with different as- pects of governing. These three branches are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This system is in place for both the federal (national) and state governments. The legislative branch, which on the national level is the U.S. Congress, passes new laws. The executive branch, headed by the president, enforces laws. The judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, inter- prets laws. While each branch has its own duties, the other branches of govern- ment have some control over its actions. These interactions are called checks and balances. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being much stronger than the others. See the diagram below for U.S. checks and balances. U.S. Checks & Balances Confirms or rejects appointments by executive (including judges) Can veto legislation Apppoints judges È È È È Legislative Executive Judicial Writes laws Enforces laws Interprets laws Ç Ç Can declare acts of the legislative or executive branch to be unconstitutional Role of the Judicial Branch Every state and the federal government have an independent judicial branch to interpret and apply state and federal laws to specific cases. By providing a place where people can go to resolve disputes according to law, through a fair process, and before a knowledgeable and neutral judge or jury, the judicial branch helps to maintain peace and order in society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Law of Schools in Iowa
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1971 The common al w of schools in Iowa Paul James Skarda Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Skarda, Paul James, "The ommonc law of schools in Iowa " (1971). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4919. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4919 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-26,893 SKARDA, Paul James, 1917- THE COMMON LAW OF SCHOOLS IN IOWA. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1971 Education, administration University Microfilms, A XEROKCompany, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED The common law of schools in Iowa by Paul James Skarda A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Educational Administration Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In charge of Majjsr Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1971 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Supreme Court Ruling
    Pieces of Iowa’s Past This Week: Iowa Territorial Supreme Court Case of “Ralph” February 26, 2020 Pieces of Iowa’s Past, published by the Iowa State Capitol Tour Guides weekly during the Legislative Session, features historical facts about Iowa, the Capitol, and the early workings of state government. All italicized text/block quotes in this document are taken directly from historical publications with the actual spelling, punctuation, and grammar retained. Iowa Territorial Supreme Court Case of “Ralph” The Case of “Ralph” is one of 10 cases published by the newly formed Territorial Supreme Court of Iowa in 1839. Jordan Montgomery from Missouri and his slave, Ralph (birth name: Rafe Nelson), had a written agreement in 1834 that allowed Ralph to leave Missouri and come to Iowa. Ralph agreed to pay $550 plus interest* for his freedom. Ralph worked in the lead mines in Dubuque, but after a few years he Thomas S. Wilson had not been able to Associate Justice earn enough to buy Iowa Territorial Supreme Court his freedom. Montgomery had run into financial problems. Two Virginia bounty hunters who were working in Dubuque contacted Montgomery and offered to return Ralph to him in Missouri for a fee of $100. Montgomery Memorial stone at accepted the offer from the bounty hunters. Ralph Montgomery’s gravesite. The Virginians swore an affidavit in front of a justice of the peace, and the court ordered the local sheriff to assist them. They found Ralph at his claim, handcuffed him, loaded him in a wagon, and started for the riverboat about 20 Pieces of Iowa’s Past February 26, 2020 2 miles downriver at Bellevue.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of Iowa ______
    In the Supreme Court of Iowa ___________________________________________________________ NO: 17-0423 ___________________________________________________________ SIERRA CLUB IOWA CHAPTER, KEITH PUNTENNEY,LAVERNE JOHNSON, Petitioners-Appellants, vs. IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, Respondent-Appellee, and OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE, Intervenor-Appellee, and DAKOTA ACCESS LLC, Indispensable Party-Appellee. ___________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY HONORABLE JEFFREY FARRELL, JUDGE ___________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S BRIEF AND ARGUMENT ___________________________________________________________ WALLACE L. TAYLOR AT0007714 Law Offices of Wallace L. Taylor 118 3rd Ave. S.E., Suite 326 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 ELECTRONICALLY FILED NOV 05, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 319-366-2428;(Fax)319-366-3886 e-mail: [email protected] ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . 3 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . 6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE. 8 Nature of the Case. 8 Statement of the Facts. 9 ROUTING STATEMENT. 14 ARGUMENT . 15 I. THE DISTRICT COURT APPLIED AN INCORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW ON JUDICIAL REVIEW FROM AGENCY ACTION. 15 II. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DETERMINING THAT THE CRUDE OIL PIPELINE IN THIS CASE PROMOTED PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY . 28 III. THE IUB VIOLATED MR. PUNTENNEY’S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS BY GRANTING DAKOTA ACCESS EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY OF HIS PROPERTY. 46 IV. THE IUB VIOLATED MR. JOHNSON’S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS BY GRANTING DAKOTA ACCESS EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY OVER HIS PROPERTY. 51 CONCLUSION . 55 REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. 59 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. 60 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . 61 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page I. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Appeal of Beasley Bros., 206 Iowa 229, 220 N.W. 306 (1928) . 19 Application of National Freight Lines, 241 Iowa 179, 40 N.W.2d 612 (1950).
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL MERRILL and KAREN JO FRESCOLN
    IN THE IOWA SUPREME COURT S.C. No. 19-0821 ____________________________________________________________ MICHAEL MERRILL and KAREN JO FRESCOLN, Plaintiff/Appellants, vs. VALLEY VIEW SWINE, LLC and JBS LIVE PORK, LLC, f/k/a CARGILL PORK, LLC, Defendants/Appellees. _____________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT WAPELLO CO. NO. LALA105144—DIVISION A HONORABLE JUDGE ANNETTE SCIESZINSKI _____________________________________________________________ APPELLANTS’ BRIEF REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT _____________________________________________________________ Steven P. Wandro AT0008177 Jennifer H. De Kock AT0010808 Benjamin G. Arato AT0010863 WANDRO & ASSOCIATES, PC 2501 Grand Avenue, Suite B Des Moines, Iowa 50312 Telephone: 515/281-1475 Facsimile: 515/281-1474 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ELECTRONICALLY FILED NOV 01, 2019 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................... 5 STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW...................... 8 ROUTING STATEMENT ......................................................................... 11 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................................................. 11 STATEMENT OF FACTS ......................................................................... 17 Karen Jo Frescoln ................................................................................... 20 Michael Merrill .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Clerkship Handbook 2019-2020
    JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP HANDBOOK 2019-2020 The University of Akron School of Law Career Services Office C. Blake McDowell Law Center 150 University Avenue Akron, OH 44325 Phone: 330-972-5321 https://www.uakron.edu/law/career-services/ Alisa Benedict O’Brien, Assistant Dean Alecia Bencze, Assistant Director 1 | Page The University of Akron School of Law Career Services Office ___________________________________________________________________ Judicial Clerkships A judicial clerkship is one of the strongest foundations upon which any law career can be built. Judicial clerkships are post-graduate positions, usually lasting one or two years, in which you work as the right-hand analytical and research person for a judge. The positions usually start in August or September of each year. Deadlines for applications to federal judges are rolling and determined by individual judges. Student applicants should apply beginning in February of 2L year (2D, 3E). Some federal judges will accept applications from students during the fall or spring of their 3L year. For Class of 2020 grads, applications will be released beginning June 17, 2019. For Class of 2021 grads, applications will be released beginning June 15, 2020. Applications for judicial clerkships with state court judges are due for some states during the 2nd year of law school, and for most states, during the fall of the 3rd year of law school. More positions are available with state court judges in your final semester as well. Judicial law clerk (“judicial clerk”) experience is universally recognized by the legal community to be extremely useful in law practice, so it is one of the most valuable experiences you could ever want on your resume.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Iowa Court of Appeals
    Doyle 7.1 2/22/2012 3:16 PM HISTORY OF THE IOWA COURT OF APPEALS Hon. Rosemary Shaw Sackett* Hon. Richard H. Doyle** I. Early History ............................................................................................. 1 II. Creation of the Iowa Court of Appeals .................................................. 3 III. The Court in Controversy ...................................................................... 10 IV. The Early Five-Judge Court .................................................................. 12 V. Changes .................................................................................................... 18 VI. The Expansion of the Iowa Court of Appeals ..................................... 20 VII. Ten-Year Anniversary ............................................................................ 22 VIII. Transitions ............................................................................................... 23 IX. Six Judges to Nine ................................................................................... 28 X. Further Transitions ................................................................................. 31 XI. Current Work of the Iowa Court of Appeals ...................................... 38 In celebration of the Iowa Court of Appeals’ thirty-fifth anniversary, we look back on its history. I. EARLY HISTORY The organic law of territorial Iowa vested judicial power in “a supreme court, district courts, probate courts, and in justices of the peace.”1 There was no provision for an intermediate
    [Show full text]