Generating and Measuring Prescribed Levels of Cohesion in Soil Simulants in Support of Extraterrestrial Terramechanics Research Laura Obregon University of Vermont

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generating and Measuring Prescribed Levels of Cohesion in Soil Simulants in Support of Extraterrestrial Terramechanics Research Laura Obregon University of Vermont University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2018 Generating And Measuring Prescribed Levels Of Cohesion In Soil Simulants In Support Of Extraterrestrial Terramechanics Research Laura Obregon University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Obregon, Laura, "Generating And Measuring Prescribed Levels Of Cohesion In Soil Simulants In Support Of Extraterrestrial Terramechanics Research" (2018). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 832. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/832 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENERATING AND MEASURING PRESCRIBED LEVELS OF COHESION IN SOIL SIMULANTS IN SUPPORT OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL TERRAMECHANICS RESEARCH A Thesis Presented by Laura Obregon to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Specializing in Civil and Environmental Engineering January, 2018 Defense Date: November 8, 2017 Thesis Examination Committee: Mandar Dewoolkar, Ph.D., Advisor Darren Hitt, Ph.D., Chairperson Ehsan Ghazanfari, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT Scientists have been well aware of the complexity of Martian and lunar regoliths. There are vast unexplored areas on both, the Moon and Mars, as well as uncertainties in our understanding of the physicochemical properties of their regoliths. Lunar and Martian regoliths differ from terrestrial soils in that they appear granular, but are expected to contain some cohesion. As such, cohesion in regolith poses challenges for future space operations, more specifically for landing, settlement, and mobility purposes. The ability to induce prescribed levels of cohesion in regolith simulants and reliably measure it would allow scientists to evaluate space technology limitations under different operational scenarios on Earth prior to a mission. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to (1) develop methods to induce prescribed levels of cohesion in dry granular media, and (2) evaluate accessible and reliable testing methods to measure cohesion. We developed and evaluated several methods to induce cohesion in two types of dry sand, F-75 silica sand and generic play sand. The methods to induce cohesion included play sand mixed with sugar-water, polymeric sand, and nanocellulose fibers, as well as F- 75 sand mixed with polydimethylsiloxane, polyvinyl acetate, crystalline silica, agar, zero- valent iron, adhesive spray, and sand surface modification using a plasma gun. Each method was assessed for advantages and disadvantages, and laboratory specimens produced using the most promising methods were tested at different compositions and densities to measure cohesion. The laboratory methods used to measure the cohesion included direct shear test, simple direct shear test, and vertical cut test. The results from these tests were then compared to tensile strength tests, using a split box test. In addition, these tests were also performed on lunar simulants JSC-1A and GRC-3 at different densities. The direct shear apparatus was available, but the other three devices were fabricated as part of this work. Based on the research results, simple methods to potentially induce low levels of cohesion in dry granular media are suggested along with suitability of laboratory methods to measure the added cohesion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at UVM and the Vermont NASA Space Grant for their financial support. I am grateful to my advisor Dr. Mandar Dewoolkar for his guidance and tutelage throughout my time at UVM, as well as to my committee members, Dr. Ehsan Ghazanfari and Dr. Darren Hitt. I am thankful to Floyd Vilmont, Jake Kittell, and Bobby Farrell for building and putting together the testing devices for this research. I am also thankful to my collaborators at the Glenn Research Center, and for the advice from Dr. Rachel Oldisnki, Patrick Charron, Dr. Raju Badireddy, and Dr. Ting Tan. I am thankful to Pattie McNatt and Debra Fraser for their support. Special thanks to Drs. Stein Sture and Dobroslav Znidarcic for providing information on the University of Colorado split box device. Also, I would like to thank my officemates, Ian Anderson, and Matt Trueheart, and undergraduate researchers, Sydney Kahn, Dunia Karzai, Eliza Jobin-Davis, and Matt Stevens. Finally and most importantly, I would like to thank the support of friends and family especially my mom, my dad, my grandparents, Dr. John Hanley, Laurene and Buck Rogers, and Dr. Donna Rizzo. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... ii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Problem Statement ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Summary of Research Contributions ............................................................ 2 1.3 Thesis Outline ............................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: Literature Review .................................................................................. 4 2.1 Regolith Cohesion and Space Exploration ................................................... 4 2.1.1 Vision for Future NASA Space Exploration ......................................... 4 2.1.2 Importance of Soil Cohesion for Space Exploration Technology and Missions .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Challenges from Planetary Cohesive Regolith ...................................... 7 2.1.4 Lunar Regolith Characteristics .............................................................. 8 2.1.5 Martian Regolith Characteristics ........................................................... 9 2.1.6 Theories behind Lunar and Martian Regolith Cohesion ...................... 10 2.2 Existing Methods to Measure Cohesion ..................................................... 13 2.3 Tensile Strength and Cohesion ................................................................... 15 2.4 Review of Laboratory Techniques for Soil Shear Strength Determination 17 2.4.1 Direct Shear Test.................................................................................. 17 2.4.2 Vertical Cut Test .................................................................................. 18 2.4.3 Simple Direct Shear Test ..................................................................... 20 2.5 Soil Tensile Strength Determination using Split Box Test ......................... 23 CHAPTER 3: Testing Methods Employed in this Research ...................................... 30 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 30 3.2 Testing Devices ........................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Direct Shear Test.................................................................................. 31 3.2.2 Simple Direct Shear Test ..................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Vertical Cut Test .................................................................................. 38 3.2.4 Split Box Test ...................................................................................... 42 3.3 Future Research for Testing Devices .......................................................... 45 iii CHAPTER 4: Simulants and Base Materials .............................................................. 48 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 48 4.2 JSC-1A ........................................................................................................ 48 4.3 GRC-3 ......................................................................................................... 51 4.4 F-75 Fine Silica Sand .................................................................................. 53 4.5 Generic Play sand ....................................................................................... 53 4.6 Glass Beads ................................................................................................. 55 CHAPTER 5: Laboratory Methods Explored to Induce Cohesion in Dry Granular Media ............................................................................................. 56 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 56 5.2 Methods Explored ....................................................................................... 56 5.2.1 Sand Mixed with Sugar-water ............................................................. 56 5.2.2 Sand Mixed with Nanocellulose Fibers ............................................... 57 5.2.3 Sand Mixed with Polymeric Sand........................................................ 58 5.2.4 Sand Mixed with Agar Gel .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Workshop on Lunar Volcanic Glasses: Scientific and Resource Potential
    WORKSHOP ON LUNAR VOLCANIC GLASSES: SCIENTIFIC AND RESOURCE POTENTIAL t)--- LPI Technical Report Number 90~02 .. LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE 3303 NASA ROAD 1 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-4399 WORKSHOP ON LUNAR VOLCANIC GLASSES: SCIENTIFIC AND RESOlTRCE POTENTIAL Edited by John W. Delano and Grant H. Heiken Held at Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas October 10 - 11, 1989 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Sample Team Lunar and Planetary Institute 3303 NASA Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058-4399 LPI Technical Report Number 90-02 Compiled in 1990 by the LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by Universities Space Research Association under Contract NASW-4066 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this document may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, educational, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any portion requires the written permission of the authors as well as appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as: Delano J. W. and Heiken G. H., eds. (1990) Workshop on Lunar Volcanic Glasses: Scientific alld Resource Potelltial. LPI Tech. Rpt. 90-02. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 74 pp. Papers in this report may be cited as: Author A. A. (1990) Title of paper. In Workshop Oil Lunar Volcanic Glasses: Scientific alld Resource Potelltial (J. W. Delano and G. H. Heiken, eds.), pp. xx-yy. LPI Tech. Rpt. 90-02. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. This report is distributed by: ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3303 NASA Road 1 Houston, TX 77058-4399 Mail order requestors will be ill voiced for the cost ofshippillg and halldling.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability Back Analysis Using Rocscience Software
    Slope Stability Back Analysis using Rocscience Software A question we are frequently asked is, “Can Slide do back analysis?” The answer is YES, as we will discover in this article, which describes various methods of back analysis using Slide and other Rocscience software. In this article we will discuss the following topics: Back analysis of material strength using sensitivity or probabilistic analysis in Slide Back analysis of other parameters (e.g. groundwater conditions) Back analysis of support force for required factor of safety Manual and advanced back analysis Introduction When a slope has failed an analysis is usually carried out to determine the cause of failure. Given a known (or assumed) failure surface, some form of “back analysis” can be carried out in order to determine or estimate the material shear strength, pore pressure or other conditions at the time of failure. The back analyzed properties can be used to design remedial slope stability measures. Although the current version of Slide (version 6.0) does not have an explicit option for the back analysis of material properties, it is possible to carry out back analysis using the sensitivity or probabilistic analysis modules in Slide, as we will describe in this article. There are a variety of methods for carrying out back analysis: Manual trial and error to match input data with observed behaviour Sensitivity analysis for individual variables Probabilistic analysis for two correlated variables Advanced probabilistic methods for simultaneous analysis of multiple parameters We will discuss each of these various methods in the following sections. Note that back analysis does not necessarily imply that failure has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Rock Properties
    Soil and rock properties W.A.C. Bennett Dam, BC Hydro 1 1) Basic testing methods 2) Soil properties and their estimation 3) Problem-oriented classification of soils 2 1 Consolidation Apparatus (“oedometer”) ELE catalogue 3 Oedometers ELE catalogue 4 2 Unconfined compression test on clay (undrained, uniaxial) ELE catalogue 5 Triaxial test on soil ELE catalogue 6 3 Direct shear (shear box) test on soil ELE catalogue 7 Field test: Standard Penetration Test (STP) ASTM D1586 Drop hammers: Standard “split spoon” “Old U.K.” “Doughnut” “Trip” sampler (open) 18” (30.5 cm long) ER=50 ER=45 ER=60 Test: 1) Place sampler to the bottom 2) Drive 18”, count blows for every 6” 3) Recover sample. “N” value = number of blows for the last 12” Corrections: ER N60 = N 1) Energy ratio: 60 Precautions: 2) Overburden depth 1) Clean hole 1.7N 2) Sampler below end Effective vertical of casing N1 = pressure (tons/ft2) 3) Cobbles 0.7 +σ v ' 8 4 Field test: Borehole vane (undrained shear strength) Procedure: 1) Place vane to the bottom 2) Insert into clay 3) Rotate, measure peak torque 4) Turn several times, measure remoulded torque 5) Calculate strength 1.0 Correction: 0.6 Bjerrum’s correction PEAK 0 20% P.I. 100% Precautions: Plasticity REMOULDED 1) Clean hole Index 2) Sampler below end of casing ASTM D2573 3) No rod friction 9 Soil properties relevant to slope stability: 1) “Drained” shear strength: - friction angle, true cohesion - curved strength envelope 2) “Undrained” shear strength: - apparent cohesion 3) Shear failure behaviour: - contractive, dilative, collapsive
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA's NORTH COAST: a Literary Watershed: Charting the Publications of the Region's Small Presses and Regional Authors
    CALIFORNIA'S NORTH COAST: A Literary Watershed: Charting the Publications of the Region's Small Presses and Regional Authors. A Geographically Arranged Bibliography focused on the Regional Small Presses and Local Authors of the North Coast of California. First Edition, 2010. John Sherlock Rare Books and Special Collections Librarian University of California, Davis. 1 Table of Contents I. NORTH COAST PRESSES. pp. 3 - 90 DEL NORTE COUNTY. CITIES: Crescent City. HUMBOLDT COUNTY. CITIES: Arcata, Bayside, Blue Lake, Carlotta, Cutten, Eureka, Fortuna, Garberville Hoopa, Hydesville, Korbel, McKinleyville, Miranda, Myers Flat., Orick, Petrolia, Redway, Trinidad, Whitethorn. TRINITY COUNTY CITIES: Junction City, Weaverville LAKE COUNTY CITIES: Clearlake, Clearlake Park, Cobb, Kelseyville, Lakeport, Lower Lake, Middleton, Upper Lake, Wilbur Springs MENDOCINO COUNTY CITIES: Albion, Boonville, Calpella, Caspar, Comptche, Covelo, Elk, Fort Bragg, Gualala, Little River, Mendocino, Navarro, Philo, Point Arena, Talmage, Ukiah, Westport, Willits SONOMA COUNTY. CITIES: Bodega Bay, Boyes Hot Springs, Cazadero, Cloverdale, Cotati, Forestville Geyserville, Glen Ellen, Graton, Guerneville, Healdsburg, Kenwood, Korbel, Monte Rio, Penngrove, Petaluma, Rohnert Part, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Sonoma Vineburg NAPA COUNTY CITIES: Angwin, Calistoga, Deer Park, Rutherford, St. Helena, Yountville MARIN COUNTY. CITIES: Belvedere, Bolinas, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Greenbrae, Inverness, Kentfield, Larkspur, Marin City, Mill Valley, Novato, Point Reyes, Point Reyes Station, Ross, San Anselmo, San Geronimo, San Quentin, San Rafael, Sausalito, Stinson Beach, Tiburon, Tomales, Woodacre II. NORTH COAST AUTHORS. pp. 91 - 120 -- Alphabetically Arranged 2 I. NORTH COAST PRESSES DEL NORTE COUNTY. CRESCENT CITY. ARTS-IN-CORRECTIONS PROGRAM (Crescent City). The Brief Pelican: Anthology of Prison Writing, 1993. 1992 Pelikanesis: Creative Writing Anthology, 1994. 1994 Virtual Pelican: anthology of writing by inmates from Pelican Bay State Prison.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Twins Toast New Year from Lunar Orbit
    Jet JANUARY Propulsion 2012 Laboratory VOLUME 42 NUMBER 1 GRAIL twins toast new year from Three-month ‘formation flying’ mission will By Mark Whalen lunar orbit study the moon from crust to core Above: The GRAIL team celebrates with cake and apple cider. Right: Celebrating said. “So it does take a lot of planning, a lot of test- the other spacecraft will accelerate towards that moun- GRAIL-A’s Jan. 1 lunar orbit insertion are, from left, Maria Zuber, GRAIL principal ing and then a lot of small maneuvers in order to get tain to measure it. The change in the distance between investigator, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Charles Elachi, JPL director; ready to set up to get into this big maneuver when we the two is noted, from which gravity can be inferred. Jim Green, NASA director of planetary science. go into orbit around the moon.” One of the things that make GRAIL unique, Hoffman JPL’s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) A series of engine burns is planned to circularize said, is that it’s the first formation flying of two spacecraft mission celebrated the new year with successful main the twins’ orbit, reducing their orbital period to a little around any body other than Earth. “That’s one of the engine burns to place its twin spacecraft in a perfectly more than two hours before beginning the mission’s biggest challenges we have, and it’s what makes this an synchronized orbit around the moon. 82-day science phase. “If these all go as planned, we exciting mission,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008 – 2009
    O L D S T U R B R I D G E Summer 2009 Special Annual VILLAGE Report Edition Visitor 2008-2009 2008--2009 Momentum and More The History of Fireworks Farms, Families, and Change Cooking with OSV Summer Events a member magazine that keeps you coming back Old Sturbridge Village, a museum and learning resource of 2008-2009 Building Momentum New England life, invites each visitor to find meaning, pleasure, a letter from President Jim Donahue relevance, and inspiration through the exploration of history. to our newly designed V I S I T O R magazine. We hope that you will learn new things and come to visit t is no secret around the Village that I like to keep my eye on the “dashboard” – a set of key the Village soon. There is always something fun to do at indicators that I am consistently checking to make sure we are steering OSV in the right direction. In fact, Welcome O l d S T u R b ri d g E V I l l a g E . I take a lot of good-natured kidding about how often I peek at the attendance figures each day, eager to see if we beat last year’s number. And I have to admit that I get energized when the daily mail brings in new donations, when the sun is shining, the parking lot is full, when I can hear happy children touring the Village, and the visitor comments are upbeat and favorable. Volume XlIX, No. 2 Summer 2009 Special Annual Report Edition I am happy to report these indicators have been overwhelmingly positive during the past year – solid proof that Old Sturbridge Village is building on last year’s successes and is poised to finish this decade much stronger There is nothing quite like learning about history from than when it started.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • Cohesion Development in Disrupted Soils As Affected by Clay and Organic Matter Content and Temperature'
    463 Reprinted from the Soil Science Society of America Journal Volume 51, no. 4. July-August 1987 677 South Segos Rd., Madmon, WI 53711 USA Cohesion Development in Disrupted Soils as Affected by Clay and Organic Matter Content and Temperature' w. D. KEMPER, R. C. ROSENAU, AND A. R. DEXTER 2 ABSTRACT OIL STRUCTURE IS DISRUPTED and bonds holding Soils were dispersed and separated into sand, silt, and clay frac- S particles together are broken frequently as soil is tions that were reconstituted to give mixtures of each soil with 5 to frozen at high water contents, wetted quickly, tilled, 40% clay. In the range from 0 to 35% clay, higher clay contents or compacted (e.g., Bullock et al, 1987). As soils dry, resulted in greater stability. Rate of cohesion recovery was over 10 increasing tension or negative pressure in the water times as fast at 90°C as it was at 23°C, showing that the processes (Briggs, 1950) pulls particles together, increasing the Involved are physical-chemical rather than biological. Maximum rates number of contact points at which bonding can take of cohesion recovery occurred at moderate soil water tensions, prob- place in newly disrupted soils. Strengths of aggregates ably because some tension is needed to pull the particles into direct formed from disrupted soils increase with time (Blake contact, but a continuous water phase is also essential to allow dif- and Oilman, 1970; Utomo and Dexter, 1981; Kemper fusion of bonding agents to the contact points. Since diffusion rates and Rosenau, 1984), even when water content re- in water increase 3e0o*, while rate of cohesion recovery increased mains constant, indicating increasing strength of par- 1000% when temperature was raised from 23 to 90°C, other factors, ticle-to-particle bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • NINETY-NINE 9\Je\Ns
    NINETY-NINE THE INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOT S MAGAZINE J _________ November-December,N 1993 • Crater Lake Flyers • !Ange(s — Corporate Angel Network • Becoming a “FED” Successful Board Meeting Reflects Fresh Outlook Just ask the Governors who were present; they didn’t pick up their knitting once - well, maybe once! The fall Board agenda was packed with items for discussion and action. On pages 10, 11 and 15 of this issue you’ll find detailed reports covering many of the items we evaluated, discussed, voted on, remanded for additional President’s Message information or to a committee, etc. We selected a new N e w s editor, Betty Rowley, and extended our thanks to Ann Cooper for her wonderful effort as editor. We discussed an informal proposal made by a member of the Atchison Historical Society Board that The 99s consider deeding 60 percent ownership of the Amelia Earhart Birthplace Museum to the Historical Society. In exchange, an undefined amount of funding for restoration would be made available. The Board unanimously decided they needed considerably more information Board members Alexis Koehler, Connie Woods, Joyce Wells, Gene Nora Jessen, Doris before an accurate assessment of this Abbate, Lee Orr, Carolyn Carpp, Lu Hollander and Lois Erickson pause during a full early-stage proposal could be fairly Board meeting schedule to look at one of the many early-day scrapbooks housed at 99s' International Headquarters. evaluated and acted upon. This addi­ tional information has been requested from the 99s’ Birthplace Museum Board, and will be available for further consideration prior to the spring Board meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Step 2-Soil Mechanics
    Step 2 – Soil Mechanics Introduction Webster defines the term mechanics as a branch of physical science that deals with energy and forces and their effect on bodies. Soil mechanics is the branch of mechanics that deals with the action of forces on soil masses. The soil that occurs at or near the surface of the earth is one of the most widely encountered materials in civil, structural and architectural engineering. Soil ranks high in degree of importance when compared to the numerous other materials (i.e. steel, concrete, masonry, etc.) used in engineering. Soil is a construction material used in many structures, such as retaining walls, dams, and levees. Soil is also a foundation material upon which structures rest. All structures, regardless of the material from which they are constructed, ultimately rest upon soil or rock. Hence, the load capacity and settlement behavior of foundations depend on the character of the underlying soils, and on their action under the stress imposed by the foundation. Based on this, it is appropriate to consider soil as a structural material, but it differs from other structural materials in several important aspects. Steel is a manufactured material whose physical and chemical properties can be very accurately controlled during the manufacturing process. Soil is a natural material, which occurs in infinite variety and whose engineering properties can vary widely from place to place – even within the confines of a single construction project. Geotechnical engineering practice is devoted to the location of various soils encountered on a project, the determination of their engineering properties, correlating those properties to the project requirements, and the selection of the best available soils for use with the various structural elements of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Wasting and Landslides
    Mass Wasting and Landslides Mass Wasting 1 Introduction Landslide and other ground failures posting substantial damage and loss of life In U.S., average 25–50 deaths; damage more than $3.5 billion For convenience, definition of landslide includes all forms of mass-wasting movements Landslide and subsidence: naturally occurred and affected by human activities Mass wasting Downslope movement of rock and soil debris under the influence of gravity Transportation of large masses of rock Very important kind of erosion 2 Mass wasting Gravity is the driving force of all mass wasting Effects of gravity on a rock lying on a hillslope 3 Boulder on a hillside Mass Movement Mass movements occur when the force of gravity exceeds the strength of the slope material Such an occurrence can be precipitated by slope-weakening events Earthquakes Floods Volcanic Activity Storms/Torrential rain Overloading the strength of the rock 4 Mass Movement Can be either slow (creep) or fast (landslides, debris flows, etc.) As terrain becomes more mountainous, the hazard increases In developed nations impacts of mass-wasting or landslides can result in millions of dollars of damage with some deaths In less developed nations damage is more extensive because of population density, lack of stringent zoning laws, scarcity of information and inadequate preparedness **We can’t always predict or prevent the occurrence of mass- wasting events, a knowledge of the processes and their relationship to local geology can lead to intelligent planning that will help
    [Show full text]