DOCSLIB.ORG

4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 View Online [1] ‘BFI ScreenOnline.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.screenonline.org.uk/ [2] ‘British Pathe.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.britishpathe.com/ [3] ‘The National Fairground Archive.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.nfa.dept.shef.ac.uk/ [4] ‘American Memory from the Library of Congress.’ [Online]. Available: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/browse/ [5] ‘Charles Urban, Motion Picture Pioneer.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.charlesurban.com/ [6] ‘British Universities Film & Video Council.’ [Online]. Available: http://bufvc.ac.uk/ [7] 1/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London ‘Regional Film Archives.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.movinghistory.ac.uk/index.html [8] ‘The Bioscope.’ [Online]. Available: http://thebioscope.net/ [9] ‘Silent London.’ [Online]. Available: http://silentlondon.co.uk/ [10] C. Musser, ‘At the Beginning: Motion Picture Production, Representation and Ideology at the Edison and Lumiere Companies’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [11] T. Gunning, ‘“Now You See it, Now you don”t’: The Temporality of the Cinema of Attractions’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [12] F. Gray, ‘A Kiss in the Tunnel (1899), G. A. Smith and the Emergence of the Edited Film in England’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [13] T. Gunning, ‘The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, it’s Spectator and the Avant-Garde’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [14] T. Gunning, ‘“Primitive” Cinema: A Frame-Up? Or, The Trick’s on Us’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. 2/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London [15] C. Musser, ‘Pre-Classical Cinema: Its Changing Modes of Film Production’, in Silent Film, vol. Rutgers depth of field series, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1996. [16] Gregory A. Waller, ‘Introducing the “Marvellous Invention” to the Provinces: Film Exhibition in Lexington, Kentucky, 1896-1897’, Film History, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 223–234, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3814979 [17] T. G. Lagos, ‘Film Exhibition in Seattle, 1897-1912: Leisure activity in a scraggly, smelly frontier town’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 101–115, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1080/0143968032000091059. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143968032000091059 [18] D. Russell, ‘A Slippery Job: Travelling Exhibitors in Early Cinema’, in Visual delights: essays on the popular and projected image in the 19th century, Trowbridge: Flicks, 2000. [19] J. Kember, ‘“It was not the show, it was the tale that you told”: Film Lecturing and Showmanship on the British Fairground’, in Visual delights: essays on the popular and projected image in the 19th century, Trowbridge: Flicks, 2000. [20] C. Barr, ‘Before Blackmail: Silent British Cinema’, in The British cinema book, 3rd ed., London: BFI, 2009. [21] T. Gunning, ‘From the Opium Den to the Theatre of Morality: Moral Discourse and the Film Process in Early American Cinema’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. 3/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London [22] C. Musser, ‘Moving Towards Fictional Narratives: Story Films Become the Dominant Product, 1903-1904’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [23] R. Abel, ‘The Cinema of Attractions in France, 1896-1914’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [24] R. Abel, ‘Pathe Goes to Town: French Films Create a Market for the Nickelodeon, 1903 – 1906’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [25] B. Salt, ‘Film Form 1890-1906’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [26] S. Bottomore, ‘Shots in the Dark – The Real Origins of Film Editing’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [27] L. S. Sanders, ‘Incentives to Vice’: Regulating Films and Audience Behaviour from the 1890s to the 1910s’, in Young and innocent?: the cinema in Britain, 1896-1930, Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2002. [28] Chanan, Michael, The dream that kicks: the prehistory and early years of cinema in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=179541 4/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London [29] D. A. Cook, ‘D.W.Griffith and the Development of Narrative Form’, in A history of narrative film, 4th ed., New York: W. W. Norton, 2004. [30] T. Gunning, ‘Weaving a Narrative: Style and Economic Background in Griffith’s Biograph Films’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [31] T. Gunning, ‘Heard over the phone: The Lonely Villa and the de Lorde tradition of the terrors of technology’, Screen, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 184–196, Jun. 1991, doi: 10.1093/screen/32.2.184. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/32.2.184 [32] R. Koszarski, ‘The Girl and Her Trust: Film into Fiction’, Film History: An International Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 198–201 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/fih/summary/v020/20.2.koszarski.html [33] C. Musser, ‘The Nickelodeon Era Begins: Establishing the Framework for Hollywood’s Mode of Representation’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [34] R. Altman, ‘The Lonely Villa and Griffith’s paradigmatic style’, Quarterly Review of Film Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123–134, Mar. 1981, doi: 10.1080/10509208109361084. [35] A. Frieberg, ‘A Properly Adjusted Window’: Vision and Sanity in D. W. Griffith’s 1908-1909 Biograph Films’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [36] 5/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London R. Bellour, ‘To Alternate/To Narrate’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [37] J. Staiger, ‘Combination and Litigation: Structures of US Film Distribution, 1896-1917’, in Early cinema: Space-frame-narrative, London]: BFI Publishing. [38] D. Riblet, ‘The Keystone Film Company and the Historiography of Early Slapstick’, in Classical Hollywood comedy, vol. AFI film readers, New York: Routledge [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=1122939 [39] A. Hastie, ‘Circuits of Memory and History: The Memoirs of Alice Guy-Blaché’, in A feminist reader in early cinema, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=1167760 [40] M. F. Norden, ‘Women in the Early Film Industry’, Wide Angle, vol. 6, no. 3, 1984. [41] S. Stamp, ‘An Awful Struggle between Love and Ambition: Serial Heroines, Serial Stars and their Female Fans’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [42] Nan Enstad, ‘Dressed for Adventure: Working Women and Silent Movie Serials in the 1910s’, Feminist Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 67–90, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178317 [43] N. Reeves, ‘Cinema, spectatorship and propaganda: “Battle of the Somme” (1916) and its 6/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London contemporary audience’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–28, Mar. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01439689700260601. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01439689700260601 [44] Roger Smither, ‘“Watch the Picture Carefully, and See If You Can Identify Anyone”: Recognition in Factual Film of the First World War Period’, Film History, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 390–404, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3815439 [45] N. Hiley, ‘“Nothing More than a Craze”: Cinema Building in Britain from 1909 to 1914’, in Young and innocent?: the cinema in Britain, 1896-1930, vol. Exeter studies in film history, Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2002. [46] M. Hammond, ‘Letters to America: A Case Study in Exhibition and Reception of American films in Britain, 1914-1918’, in Young and innocent?: the cinema in Britain, 1896-1930, vol. Exeter studies in film history, Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2002. [47] M. Hammond, ‘Laughter during wartime: comedy and the language of trauma in British cinema regulation 1917’, Screen, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 222–228, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1093/screen/44.2.222. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/44.2.222 [48] B. Singer, ‘Manhattan Nickelodeons: New Data on Audiences and Exhibitors’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [49] Robert A. Armour, ‘Effects of Censorship Pressure on the New York Nickelodeon Market, 1907-1909’, Film History, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3814996 7/17 09/28/21 4AAQH126: Film History 1895-1930 | King's College London [50] M. Hammond, ‘“The Men Who Came Back” Anonymity and Recognition in Local British Roll of Honour Films (1914-1918) [Scope]’ [Online]. Available: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/scope/documents/2000/december-2000/hammond.pdf [51] Jon Burrows, ‘Penny Pleasures: Film Exhibition in London during the Nickelodeon Era, 1906-1914’, Film History, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–91, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3815560 [52] C. J. Maitland, ‘A Star is Born: American Culture and the Dynamics of Charlie Chaplin’s Star Image 1913-1916’, in The Silent Cinema Reader, London: Routledge, 2004. [53] J. C. Robertson, ‘Dawn (1928): Edith Cavell and Anglo-German Relations’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–28, Jan. 1984, doi: 10.1080/01439688400260021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01439688400260021 [54] J. Staiger, ‘Chapter 7: The Butterfly’, in Bad women: regulating sexuality in early American cinema, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310330 [55] R. DeCordova, ‘The Emergence of the Star System in America’, in Stardom: industry of desire, London: Routledge, 1991 [Online].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock
    The Hitchcock 9 Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock Justin Mckinney Presented at the National Gallery of Art The Lodger (British Film Institute) and the American Film Institute Silver Theatre Alfred Hitchcock’s work in the British film industry during the silent film era has generally been overshadowed by his numerous Hollywood triumphs including Psycho (1960), Vertigo (1958), and Rebecca (1940). Part of the reason for the critical and public neglect of Hitchcock’s earliest works has been the generally poor quality of the surviving materials for these early films, ranging from Hitchcock’s directorial debut, The Pleasure Garden (1925), to his final silent film, Blackmail (1929). Due in part to the passage of over eighty years, and to the deterioration and frequent copying and duplication of prints, much of the surviving footage for these films has become damaged and offers only a dismal representation of what 1920s filmgoers would have experienced. In 2010, the British Film Institute (BFI) and the National Film Archive launched a unique restoration campaign called “Rescue the Hitchcock 9” that aimed to preserve and restore Hitchcock’s nine surviving silent films — The Pleasure Garden (1925), The Lodger (1926), Downhill (1927), Easy Virtue (1927), The Ring (1927), Champagne (1928), The Farmer’s Wife (1928), The Manxman (1929), and Blackmail (1929) — to their former glory (sadly The Mountain Eagle of 1926 remains lost). The BFI called on the general public to donate money to fund the restoration project, which, at a projected cost of £2 million, would be the largest restoration project ever conducted by the organization. Thanks to public support and a $275,000 dona- tion from Martin Scorsese’s The Film Foundation in conjunction with The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the project was completed in 2012 to coincide with the London Olympics and Cultural Olympiad.
    [Show full text]
  • (2020). Pinewood Studios, the Independent Frame, and Innovation
    Street, S. (2020). Pinewood Studios, the Independent Frame, and Innovation. In B. R. Jacobson (Ed.), In the Studio: Visual Creation and Its Material Environments (1 ed., pp. 103-121). University of California Press. Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available via University of California Press at https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520297609/in-the-studio . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Pinewood Studios, the Independent Frame, and Innovation Sarah Street, University of Bristol British director Darrel Catling reported to the British trade press in February 1948 on the Independent Frame (IF), a new system of film production that had been launched at Pinewood Studios. Catling had recently used it to make Under the Frozen Falls, a short children’s film that had benefited from the IF’s aim to “rationalize that which is largely irrational in film making.”1 He described how his film had been very carefully pre-planned in terms of script, storyboards, and technical plans. Several scenes were pre-staged and filmed without the main cast who were later incorporated into scenes by means of rear projection. Special effects were of paramount importance in reducing the number of sets that needed to be built.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline London's Hollywood: the Gainsborough
    Timeline / London’s Hollywood: The Gainsborough Studio in the Silent Years 1 Timeline London’s Hollywood: The Gainsborough Studio in the Silent Years 1919 4/1919 Formation of Famous Players Lasky British Producers Limited 7/1919 Arrival of Albert A. Kaufman (production supervisor) Arrival of Richard Murphy (scenic artist) and others 8/1919 Arrival of Eve Unsell (head of scenario) 10/1919 Purchase of lease on building to be converted into studio 11/1919 Arrival of Milton Hoffman (general manager) 1920 2/1920 Appointment of Mde Langfier in Paris to run wardrobe department 3/1920 Arrival of Adolph Zukor 4/1920 Arrival of director Hugh Ford 5/1920 Opening of the studio 5/1920 Filming of The Great Day (May-June) 5/1920 Major Bell promoted to studio manager 6/1920 Arrival of Jesse Lasky 7/1920 Major Bell to America for three months 8/1920 Appointment of Robert James Cullen as assistant director 8/1920 Filming of The Call of Youth (August - September) 9/1920 Filming exteriors of The Call of Youth in Devon 9/1920 Eve Unsell returns to America 9/1920 Arrival of Margaret Turnbull, Roswell Dague (Scenarists) & Robert MacAlarney (General Production Manager) 10/1920 Arrival of Major Bell & director Donald Crisp 10/1920 Milton Hoffman returns to America 10/1920 Major Bell appoints James Sloan (Assistant Manager) 10/1920 Filming Appearances (October - December) 10/1920 Arrival of Paul Powell 11/1920 Trade Show The Great Day Trade Show The Call of Youth 12/1920 Filming The Mystery Road (December – May) Exteriors on the Riviera (December -February) Interiors
    [Show full text]
  • Celluloid Television Culture the Specificity of Film on Television: The
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Celluloid Television Culture The Specificity of Film on Television: the Action-adventure Text as an Example of a Production and Textual Strategy, 1955 – 1978. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40025/ Version: Full Version Citation: Sexton, Max (2013) Celluloid Television Culture The Speci- ficity of Film on Television: the Action-adventure Text as an Example of a Production and Textual Strategy, 1955 – 1978. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Celluloid Television Culture The Specificity of Film on Television: the Action-adventure Text as an Example of a Production and Textual Strategy, 1955 – 1978. Max Sexton A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Birkbeck, University of London, 2012. Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis presented by me for examination of the PhD degree is solely my own work, other than where I have clearly indicated. Birkbeck, University of London Abstract of Thesis (5ST) Notes for Candidate: 1. Type your abstract on the other side of this sheet. 2. Use single-spacing typing. Limit your abstract to one side of the sheet. 3. Please submit this copy of your abstract to the Research Student Unit, Birkbeck, University of London, Registry, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, at the same time as you submit copies of your thesis. 4. This abstract will be forwarded to the University Library, which will send this sheet to the British Library and to ASLIB (Association of Special Libraries and Information Bureaux) for publication to Index to Theses .
    [Show full text]
  • Ealing Studios and the Ealing Comedies: the Tip of the Iceberg
    Ealing Studios and the Ealing Comedies: the Tip of the Iceberg ROBERT WINTER* In lecture form this paper was illustrated with video clips from Ealing films. These are noted below in boxes in the text. My subject is the legendary Ealing Studios comedies. But the comedies were only the tip of the iceberg. To show this I will give a sketch of the film industry leading to Ealing' s success, and of the part played by Sir Michael Balcon over 25 years.! Today, by touching a button or flicking a switch, we can see our values, styles, misdemeanours, the romance of the past and present-and, with imagination, a vision of the" future. Now, there are new technologies, of morphing, foreground overlays, computerised sets, electronic models. These technologies affect enormously our ability to give currency to our creative impulses and credibility to what we do. They change the way films can be produced and, importantly, they change the level of costs for production. During the early 'talkie' period there many artistic and technical difficulties. For example, artists had to use deep pan make-up to' compensate for the high levels of carbon arc lighting required by lower film speeds. The camera had to be put into a soundproof booth when shooting back projection for car travelling sequences. * Robert Winter has been associated with the film and television industries since he appeared in three Gracie Fields films in the mid-1930s. He joined Ealing Studios as an associate editor in 1942 and worked there on more than twenty features. After working with other studios he became a founding member of Yorkshire Television in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the William K
    Guide to the William K. Everson Collection George Amberg Memorial Film Study Center Department of Cinema Studies Tisch School of the Arts New York University Descriptive Summary Creator: Everson, William Keith Title: William K. Everson Collection Dates: 1894-1997 Historical/Biographical Note William K. Everson: Selected Bibliography I. Books by Everson Shakespeare in Hollywood. New York: US Information Service, 1957. The Western, From Silents to Cinerama. New York: Orion Press, 1962 (co-authored with George N. Fenin). The American Movie. New York: Atheneum, 1963. The Bad Guys: A Pictorial History of the Movie Villain. New York: Citadel Press, 1964. The Films of Laurel and Hardy. New York: Citadel Press, 1967. The Art of W.C. Fields. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967. A Pictorial History of the Western Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1969. The Films of Hal Roach. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1971. The Detective in Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1972. The Western, from Silents to the Seventies. Rev. ed. New York: Grossman, 1973. (Co-authored with George N. Fenin). Classics of the Horror Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1974. Claudette Colbert. New York: Pyramid Publications, 1976. American Silent Film. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, Love in the Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1979. More Classics of the Horror Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1986. The Hollywood Western: 90 Years of Cowboys and Indians, Train Robbers, Sheriffs and Gunslingers, and Assorted Heroes and Desperados. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Pub. Group, 1992. Hollywood Bedlam: Classic Screwball Comedies. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Pub. Group, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A British Empire of Their Own? Jewish Entrepreneurs in the British Film
    ‘A British Empire of Their Own? Jewish Entrepreneurs in the British Film Industry’ Andrew Spicer (University of the West of England) Introduction The importance of Jewish entrepreneurs in the development of Hollywood has long been recognized, notably in Neil Gabler’s classic study, An Empire of Their Own (1988). No comparable investigation and analysis of the Jewish presence in the British film industry has been conducted.1 This article provides a preliminary overview of the most significant Jewish entrepreneurs involved in British film culture from the early pioneers through to David Puttnam. I use the term ‘entrepreneur’ rather than ‘film-maker’ because I am analyzing film as an industry, thus excluding technical personnel, including directors.2 Space restrictions have meant the reluctant omission of Sidney Bernstein and Oscar Deutsch because the latter was engaged solely in cinema building and the former more significant in the development of commercial television.3 I have also confined myself to Jews born in the UK, thus excluding the Danziger brothers, Filippo del Giudice, Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus, Alexander Korda, Harry Saltzman and Max Schach.4 I should emphasize that my aim is to characterize the nature of the contribution of my chosen figures to the development of British cinema, not provide detailed career profiles.5 The idea that Jews controlled the British film industry surfaced most noticeably in the late 1930s when the undercurrent of anti-Semitic prejudice in British society took public forms; Isidore Ostrer, head of the giant Gaumont-British Picture Corporation (GBPC) was referred to in the House of Commons as an ‘unnaturalised alien’ (Low 1985: 243).
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Get the London Look: Anna Neagle As the Emblem of British Fashion and Femininity in Maytime in Mayfair (1949). Between 19
    Title: Get the London Look: Anna Neagle as the Emblem of British Fashion and Femininity in Maytime in Mayfair (1949). Between 1947 and 1952, the top British female star at the domestic box office was Anna Neagle. She had displaced Margaret Lockwood, who had achieved the top position during the war years with her turns as dangerous and subversive women in Gainsborough pictures such as The Man in Grey (Arliss, 1943) and, most famously, The Wicked Lady (Arliss, 1945). In both films Lockwood co-starred with James Mason, the brooding, somewhat sadistic idol to a legion of female fans. Mason, mirroring Lockwood’s popularity, was the top male star of 1945 and his appeal was a ‘combination of romantic allure and Sadean fascination’ (Evans 2001: 108) – an appeal that meshed with Lockwood’s ‘unity of transgression and sexual appetite’ (Babington 2001: 94). Aimed at a largely female audience, the Gainsborough melodramas provided escapism and the danger and sexual allure of the characters and stars resulted in a skewing of ‘moral logic’ (Leach 2004: 67), which Jeffrey Richards reads as revelatory of the wartime dislocation of moral values (Richards 1985: 292). With the end of the war, however, there came a reclamation of traditional values, not least in British cinema. In the years immediately following the war, there was a distinct pattern in British films that foregrounded ‘the British people’ as hero, a pattern following the wartime work of Humphrey Jennings in providing images of a united Britain; and the idea image of a Briton was a figure of restraint, good-humour and self-deprecation.
    [Show full text]
  • SFSFF 2018 Program Book
    elcome to the San Francisco Silent Film Festival for five days and nights of live cinema! This is SFSFFʼs twenty-third year of sharing revered silent-era Wmasterpieces and newly revived discoveries as they were meant to be experienced—with live musical accompaniment. We’ve even added a day, so there’s more to enjoy of the silent-era’s treasures, including features from nine countries and inventive experiments from cinema’s early days and the height of the avant-garde. A nonprofit organization, SFSFF is committed to educating the public about silent-era cinema as a valuable historical and cultural record as well as an art form with enduring relevance. In a remarkably short time after the birth of moving pictures, filmmakers developed all the techniques that make cinema the powerful medium it is today— everything except for the ability to marry sound to the film print. Yet these films can be breathtakingly modern. They have influenced every subsequent generation of filmmakers and they continue to astonish and delight audiences a century after they were made. SFSFF also carries on silent cinemaʼs live music tradition, screening these films with accompaniment by the worldʼs foremost practitioners of putting live sound to the picture. Showcasing silent-era titles, often in restored or preserved prints, SFSFF has long supported film preservation through the Silent Film Festival Preservation Fund. In addition, over time, we have expanded our participation in major film restoration projects, premiering four features and some newly discovered documentary footage at this event alone. This year coincides with a milestone birthday of film scholar extraordinaire Kevin Brownlow, whom we celebrate with an onstage appearance on June 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hartford-Davis and British Exploitation Cinema of the 1960S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository Corrupted, Tormented and Damned: Reframing British Exploitation Cinema and The films of Robert Hartford-Davis This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Michael Ahmed, M.A., B.A. PhD University of East Anglia Faculty of Film and Television Studies January 2013 Abstract The American exploitation film functioned as an alternative to mainstream Hollywood cinema, and served as a way of introducing to audiences shocking, controversial themes, as well as narratives that major American studios were reluctant to explore. Whereas American exploitation cinema developed in parallel to mainstream Hollywood, exploitation cinema in Britain has no such historical equivalent. Furthermore, the definition of exploitation, in terms of the British industry, is currently used to describe (according to the Encyclopedia of British Film) either poor quality sex comedies from the 1970s, a handful of horror films, or as a loosely fixed generic description dependent upon prevailing critical or academic orthodoxies. However, exploitation was a term used by the British industry in the 1960s to describe a wide-ranging and eclectic variety of films – these films included, ―kitchen-sink dramas‖, comedies, musicals, westerns, as well as many films from Continental Europe and Scandinavia. Therefore, the current description of an exploitation film in Britain has changed a great deal from its original meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • CRITERION COLLECTION PRESENTS the Forgiveness of Blood
    AVAILABLE on BLU-RAY AnD DVD! THE CRITERION COLLECTION PRESENTS ThE FoRgIVEnEss oF BLooD THE STARTLING NEW DRAMA FROM THE DIRECTOR OF MARIA FULL OF GRACE FRESH FROm its THEaTRICaL RuN! american director JOSHUA MARSTON broke out in 2004 with his jolting, Oscar-nominated Maria Full of Grace, about a young Colombian woman working as a drug mule. In his remarkable follow-up, The Forgiveness of Blood, he turns his camera on another corner of the world: contemporary northern albania, a place still troubled by the ancient custom of interfamilial blood feuds. From this reality, marston sculpts a fictional narrative about a teenage brother and sister physically and emotionally trapped in a cycle of violence, a result of their father’s entanglement with a rival clan over a piece of land. The Forgiveness of Blood is a tense and perceptive depiction of a place where tradition and progress have an uneasy coexistence, as well as a dynamic coming-of-age drama. WINNER DIRECTOR-APPROVED Best SCREENPLay, BERLIN FILm FestivaL, 2011 SPECIAL EDITION FEATURES · New high-definition digital transfer, approved by producer Paul mezey, with 5.1 surround DTS-HD “Marston may be indie cinema’s finest master audio soundtrack on the Blu-ray edition immersive journalist.” · Audio commentary featuring director and cowriter —David Fear, Time Out New York Joshua marston · Two new video programs: Acting Close to Home, “An accomplished and suspenseful drama.” a discussion between marston and actors Refet —The Hollywood Reporter abazi, Tristan Halilaj, and Sindi Laçej, and Truth on the Ground, featuring new and on-set interviews with mezey, abazi, Halilaj, and Laçej BLU-RAY EDITION SRP $39.95 PREBOOk 9/18/12 STREET 10/16/12 · audition and rehearsal footage CaT.
    [Show full text]
  • FLM005 Introduction to British Cinema
    1 Introduction to British Cinema 1930 to 1960 Semester A Screening: Thursday 0900, Arts One G34 Lecture: Thursday 1100, Arts Lecture Theatre Seminar Group A: Thursday 1300-1400, Laws 1 Seminar Group B: Thursday 1400-1500, Maths MB 203 Course organiser: Adrian Garvey Email: [email protected] Office hour: Friday, 1415-1515 room 1.02 Arts One Course Description The course looks at some of the key films of the British cinema from the 1930s through to the 1950s, providing both a historical and critical overview of this rich period. While most of the films that will be screened during the course have been chosen as examples of the work of distinguished directors, room has also been made for films more squarely in the tradition of popular cinema. The aim is to provide an opportunity for the analysis of some of the characteristics of British national cinema, and to question some of the assumptions relating to that cinema, such as that it is too literary or theatrical. The chosen films will provide a focus for discussion in the seminars of such topics as British ‘auteurs’ (e.g., Hitchcock), stars (e.g., James Mason), genre (e.g., the Gainsborough melodrama), form (e.g. the tensions between realist and ‘expressionist’ approaches to film-making), censorship, the influence of the documentary tradition and the industry’s links with theatre, broadcasting and the state. Assessment Assessment consists of two 1000-word sequence analysis assignments (each worth 25% of the overall grade) and one 2000-word essay (worth 50%). The deadline for the first sequence analysis is Sunday 3 November (end of week 6).
    [Show full text]