Recent Accessions to the Cambridgeshire Collection 2005 Chris Jakes
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Southampton Canal Society Newsletter
Southampton Canal Society February 2019 Newsletter Issue 552 In this issue: Chairman’s Column Chairman’s Column 1 February 7th Meeting you would like brought up please inform any Committee Member tonight or Email or telephone New Year Luncheon 2019 1 Toight e look forard to learig aout Bats- (the details are on the back page of this the “uper Heroes of the ight ith Nik Kight. Quiz Winners 1 Newsletter). Thank you to Sue Derbyshire for arranging this Trio rescued from canal 1 evening. SCS New Year Luncheon Waterways Events 2 & 3 March Meeting - Thursday 7th 24 members enjoyed a well presented Lunch at Keats Restaurant, Ampfield on Saturday 12th January Meeting 3 “tea Narrooatig- ot for the fait hearted January. Angela spoke to Linda Pearce and invited with Mark Rudall. Cotswold Canals 4 her along, they sat with Christine Wilkinson, April Meeting - Thursday 4th Putting the port back in Marjorie and Julie Callow and all enjoyed a good 4 natter. Brimscombe Chris Witts ith My life o the ‘ier “eer ased o the taker trade i the 6s, to the Unfortunately Eva was not feeling well after a Putting the pub back in 4 disturbed night and has had a spell in hospital for Dauntsey grai trade i the s. Committee Meeting tests. We wish her well. Flood scheme on track for 5 th 2019 start Our next Committee Meeting is on the 18 Enjoy the Bats. February. If you have any questions or suggestions Alan Rose Trust to begin major project 5 The Coal Canal Way 5 New Year Luncheon 2019 Trio rescued from canal In the Romsey Advertiser of 4 January, on page 8 under NEWS IN BRIEF, Brian and Annegret found the following article: Three people were rescued by fire fighters after falling into a Hampshire canal. -
Social & Legal Studies
Social & Legal Studies http://sls.sagepub.com/ 'Setting 'Em Up': Personal, Familial and Institutional Grooming in the Sexual Abuse of Children Anne-Marie Mcalinden Social & Legal Studies 2006 15: 339 DOI: 10.1177/0964663906066613 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Social & Legal Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sls.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sls.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339.refs.html >> Version of Record - Aug 29, 2006 What is This? Downloaded from sls.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ALABAMA on August 13, 2012 ‘SETTING ’EM UP’: PERSONAL, FAMILIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL GROOMING IN THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN ANNE-MARIE MCALINDEN Queen’s University Belfast, UK ABSTRACT The term ‘grooming’ has been used to describe the offender’s actions during the preparatory stage of sexual abuse. This article will argue that current discourses on grooming have created ambiguities and misunderstandings about child sexual abuse. In particular, the popular focus on ‘stranger danger’ belies the fact that the majority of children are abused by someone well known to them, where grooming can also occur. Current discourses also neglect other important facets of the sex offending pattern. They fail to consider that offenders may groom not only the child but also their family and even the local community who may act as the gatekeepers of access. -
Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science
Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Other responses Contents-Other responses Organisation Name Response Type ACPO Substantive Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Substantive Analytical Services International Ltd Response on behalf of Analytical Services International Ltd both as an academic researcher and a forensic service provider Association of Forensic Service Providers' Body Substantive Fluid Forum CCL Forensics Substantive Cellmark Forensic Services Substantive Crown Prosecution Service Substantive DSTL Substantive Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine Substantive Forensic Access Ltd. Substantive Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spetrometry Substantive (FIRMS) Network Forensic Science Northern Ireland Substantive Forensic Science Service 1 Substantive Forensic Science Service 2 Substantive Forensic Science Society Substantive Forensic Telecommunication Services Ltd Substantive Forensic Working Group for the Partnership Substantive against Wildlife Crime Freelance Scientists (but aligned to universities) Substantive Home Office Scientific Development Branch Substantive (name changed to Centre for Applied Science and Technology in April 2011) Intellect (trade association for the IT, telecoms Substantive and electronics industries) LGC Forensics Substantive LTG Executive Committee Substantive The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen Substantive National DNA Database Ethics Group Substantive National Physical Laboratory Substantive National Policing Improvement Agency Substantive Natural History Museum Substantive Prospect -
National Guidance on the Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records
National Guidance on the minimum standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records These GUIDANCE NOTES contain information to assist policing in England, Wales & Northern Ireland. It is OFFICIAL under the Government Security Classification Scheme. It is disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. NPCC © 2016 Document information These Guidance Notes have been produced by the Information Management for the Police Service Group on behalf of the NPCC DP, FOI and RM Portfolio Group and were endorsed by NPCC Cabinet/Chief Constables’ Council. It will be updated according to legislative and policy changes and re-published as required. 2 Content Section Page 1 Background 4 4 2 Responsibilities for Records Retention & Disposal 4 3 Risk 4 4 Benefits of a Retention Schedule 5 5 Disposal 5 6 Management of Police Information (MoPI) 5 7 Maintenance 5 8 Glossary 5 9 Records Retention Tables 6 • Assets and Products 7 • Crime and Case Files 11 • Detecting 15 • Finance 23 • Information 29 • Organisation, Programmes & Projects 32 • People 37 • Preventing 43 • Property 47 • Prosecution 50 Appendix A : Table of Retention Periods 3 1. Background 1.1 The NPCC Guidance on The Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police records has been produced by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) to assist police forces in their statutory responsibility to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) / Data Protection Act 2018, The Code of Practice on the Management of Police Information (2005) and other legislative requirements. The Information Management – Management of Police Information section of the Authorised Professional Practice (APP) is the detailed guidance referred to in the Code of Practice and supersedes ACPO (2010) Guidance on Management of Police Information. -
The National Way Point Rally Handbook
75th Anniversary National Way Point Rally The Way Point Handbook 2021 Issue 1.4 Contents Introduction, rules and the photographic competition 3 Anglian Area Way Points 7 North East Area Way Points 18 North Midlands Way Points 28 North West Area Way Points 36 Scotland Area Way Points 51 South East Way Points 58 South Midlands Way Points 67 South West Way Points 80 Wales Area Way Points 92 Close 99 75th Anniversary - National Way Point Rally (Issue 1.4) Introduction, rules including how to claim way points Introduction • This booklet represents the combined • We should remain mindful of guidance efforts of over 80 sections in suggesting at all times, checking we comply with on places for us all to visit on bikes. Many going and changing national and local thanks to them for their work in doing rules, for the start, the journey and the this destination when visiting Way Points • Unlike in normal years we have • This booklet is sized at A4 to aid compiled it in hope that all the location printing, page numbers aligned to the will be open as they have previously pdf pages been – we are sorry if they are not but • It is suggested you read the booklet on please do not blame us, blame Covid screen and only print out a few if any • This VMCC 75th Anniversary event is pages out designed to be run under national covid rules that may still in place We hope you enjoy some fine rides during this summer. Best wishes from the Area Reps 75th Anniversary - National Way Point Rally (Issue 1.4) Introduction, rules including how to claim way points General -
Newsletter July 2020
Hemingford Grey Parish Council Newsletter July 2020 Notes from the Chair There’s no denying the last four months or so have not been easy and unfortunately there are still likely to be difficult periods ahead. However, as we carefully and gradually come out of lockdown, it's right that we start looking towards the future. The pandemic has shown us that, people suddenly confined to their homes and locality discovered a world and community literally on their doorsteps that they’d either forgotten about or had been too busy to engage with. I believe that hope can be found in this, and particularly in the resurgence of community spirit. The numbers who volunteered for the HemingfordHub or just helped out a neighbour demonstrate that when the going gets really tough, we come together to support each other. And, when individuals from across the local community join forces, these actions become all the more powerful. So perhaps the one “silver-lining” of the coronavirus outbreak and the enforced lockdown, could be a lasting and positive effect on community engagement. To that end, in this edition of the newsletter, we update you on some of the initiatives that Parish Council are already taking forward and ask you to join us. That could be as simple as watering one of our recently planted trees, getting involved in one of our forthcoming events, such as the rescheduled litter pick, joining one of our working groups, or becoming a Parish Councillor. But whatever it is, you decide to do, or how much time you can offer – let’s take something positive out of the last few months. -
1 Intelligence, Policing and the Use of Algorithmic Analysis
Intelligence, policing and the use of algorithmic analysis: a freedom of information- based study Marion Oswald (University of Winchester) and Jamie Grace (Sheffield Hallam University)1 1. Introduction This article explores some of the legal and societal issues around algorithmic and computational intelligence analysis used within policing in the United Kingdom; methods which interlink with the use of so-called 'Big Data' and are commonly badged as data science. These techniques are used in modern law enforcement as aides to decision-making and evaluation, mapping crimes, and even predicting where the next crimes are likely to occur, and hence, purportedly assisting the police to prevent crimes occurring. In an era of austerity in which police are under pressure to do more with less, these techniques promise to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of a police force. Conversely, the use of algorithms combined with the rise of Big Data presents society with a number of privacy and ethical concerns. There has been a call for more predictive policing in the United Kingdom, using 'Big Data' techniques in intelligence analysis, as demonstrated by the National Policing Vision for 2016, which hopes that ‘predictive analysis and real-time access to intelligence and tasking in the field will be available on modern mobile devices.’2 This suggests the increasing importance of predictive policing, allowing forces to ‘drive improvements in investigations, proactive patrolling, the protection of vulnerable people and the management of offenders and dangerous people.’3 This statement indicates the variety of different aims to which algorithmic methods may contribute, both on the macro and the micro (individual) level, each of which involves differing benefits and risks. -
Safe from Harm? 10 Years After Soham
Safe from harm? 10 years after Soham... Foreword The past 10 years, as a father, school governor and solicitor representing victims of child abuse, I have considered from different perspectives the impact of measures taken in response to the Soham tragedy. At the time of the murders in the summer of 2002 steps had already been initiated to improve upon child protection measures, under the Police Act 1997. However, further steps were taken, after Soham, to provide greater protection. In the past 10 years, from my different perspectives, I have had cause to wonder whether those steps have had the kind of beneficial effect that we all hoped for. I became concerned that, perhaps, inappropriate individuals were still working in schools. I therefore commissioned this report to ascertain whether those perceptions were real or imaginary. The information collated from the majority of England’s local education authorities supports my concern that there are still too many people gaining access to children, for their own iniquitous behaviour. Of equal concern is that some local education authorities were unable to provide answers to the requests, as they do not collate the statistics. As to those authorities that did respond, the replies reveal a high number of allegations of abuse and consequential action taken. This suggests further work needs to be done and I am delighted that so many stakeholders have participated in the report which, I hope, will promote further contributions on this very important subject. Malcolm Underhill Partner, IBB Solicitors Safe from harm? | 10 years after Soham | Page 3 Introduction Freedom of information..... -
UNIVERSITY of SURREY LIBRARY All Rights Reserved
8906429 ■ ---- UNIVERSITY OF SURREY LIBRARY All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if materia! had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Solving Factors and Decision-Making in “Hard to Solve” Murder Enquiries By Mark Roycroft Submitted to the University of Surrey for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 2 This thesis, and the work to which it refers, are the results of my own efforts. Any ideas, data, images or text resulting from the work of others (whether published or unpublished) are fully identified as such within the work and attributed to their originator in the text, bibliography or in footnotes. This thesis has not been submitted in whole or in part for any other academic degree or professional qualification. I agree that the University has the right to submit my work to the plagiarism detection service, Turnitin UK, for originality checks. Whether or not drafts have been so-assessed, the University reserves the right to require an electronic version of the final document (as submitted) for assessment as above. -
Duncan Colin Woods Forensics in 2010-2020 Forensic Overview
have little idea of the case context of their Dr Woods can also advise on evidence work. prepared under the Streamlined Forensic Reporting (SFR) regime: its value and its Forensic Overview limitations. The prosecution scientist is often limited to commenting on what evidence has Because of this, it is not uncommon for Keith Borer Consultants prepares over 2000 been found and not how it may have got experienced forensic scientists instructed by forensic reports each year for cases being there. the defence, such as Keith Borer Consultants’ heard throughout the UK, Ireland and further Dr Duncan Woods, to be the only forensic afield on occasion. The company employs all expert at Court able to provide an insight into its experts directly and invests in continuous the overall evidential value of the various professional development for all staff. Duncan Colin Woods strands of forensic evidence being presented. Detailed curriculum vitae for our experts can BSc, PhD, MCSFS, MEWI Dr Woods has been with Keith Borer be found at www.keithborer.co.uk . Consultants since its early days in the 1980s. Dr Woods is Chief Scientist at Keith He is a specialist in forensic biology, such as Borer Consultants. He is instructed Forensics in 2010-2020 in approximately 80 criminal cases blood pattern analysis and sexual assault each year including assaults, The provision of forensic science services to cases, and also has significant case experience murders, sexual offences and other the prosecution has seen significant change in fibre transfer and footwear mark evidence. offences involving contact transfer over the last few years and this has affected Dr Woods commented “I have sympathy for evidence. -
Annual Report 2013
Civic Society of St Ives Annual Report 2013 THE CIVIC SOCIETY OF ST IVES The Civic Society of St Ives was formed in 1968 to fight the pro- posed plans to route the St Ives Bypass down Ramsey Road, across The Waits, Holt Island and Hemingford Meadow. The siting of the St Ives Bypass as it is today is a result of our ear- ly campaigns. The Society continues to care for the beauty and character of the town, as well as working to stimulate public interest in civic mat- ters and to provide an information service for those who wish to know more about the town’s history and development, and of the surrounding area. Its web-site can be found at: www.stivescivic.org.uk The society is a member of: The Campaign to Protect Rural England www.cpre.org.uk and The Cambridge Antiquarian Society www.camantsoc.org 2 CONTENTS The Civic Society of St Ives—Its Aims 2 Chairman’s Report 4 Annual Accounts 6 Treasurer’s Report 8 Minutes of the last Annual General Meeting—2012 10 Annual General Meeting 2013—Agenda 14 Summary of Talks 2012—2013 15 Programme of Talks 2013—2014 24 Civic Society visit to Houghton Hall 38 Hidden History of St Ives Parish Church Hall 43 History Presentation Boards 47 Thomas Hodgson Liddell 48 3 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT It scarcely seems a year since the last Report was written and once again I am writing it in July to allow time for compilation, printing and distribution for our AGM in October. -
1 Agenda Item No: 4 ST IVES BRIDGE CHAPEL
Agenda Item No: 4 ST IVES BRIDGE CHAPEL – MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE USE To: Assets and Investment Committee Meeting Date: 16th December 2016 From: Deputy Chief Executive, Chris Malyon Electoral division(s): St Ives Forward Plan ref: N/a Key decision: No Purpose: To propose a formal agreement with the Norris Museum to manage the Chapel of St Ledger, St Ives River Bridge on behalf of Cambridgeshire County Council. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Committee; Agree the proposed draft agreement set out by the Norris Museum for management of the asset. Officer contact: Name: Stephen McGee Post: Bridge Engineer – Highway Projects Email: [email protected] Tel: 01223 715652 1 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 St Ives River Bridge and Chapel is a 15th century six span stone arch structure and is noted for being only one of four bridges in England to incorporate a chapel. The structure is a Scheduled Ancient Monument and Grade 1 listed and therefore any structural or fabric alterations must be approved by Historic England. 1.2 The bridge was originally a toll bridge under the ownership of the Duke of Manchester. By 1921 the bridge had fallen into disrepair and the Duke sold it to Huntingdonshire County Council (predecessor to Cambridgeshire County Council). Since 1921 the bridge has been the responsibility of the County Council, forming part of the highway asset and therefore maintained as such. 1.3 Legal records show that the Chapel wasn’t included at the time, but was sold separately under another conveyance dated in 1928 from Mence & Mence to the County Council for the Administrative County of Huntingdon.