The Connecticut General Assembly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Connecticut General Assembly The Connecticut General Assembly Joint Committee on Legislative Management Martin M. Looney Joe Aresimowicz Senate President Pro Tempore Speaker of the House Bob Duff, Senate Majority Leader Matthew Ritter, House Majority Leader Leonard Fasano, Senate Republican Themis Klarides, House Republican Leader President Pro Tempore James P. Tracy Executive Director 4/21/17 TO: All Respondents of Record FROM: Tina Nadeau Mohr RE: Responses to Questions and Clarifications Engineering, Production and Distribution for the Connecticut Network – JCLM18REG0008 The following Request for Proposal (RFP) questions, answers and clarifications are provided to those who have received the Connecticut General Assembly’s RFP for the above referenced Request for Proposal. Thank you for your continued interest in the Connecticut General Assembly procurements. JOINT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. Please provide a copy of the current contract for the engineering, production and distribution of the CT-Network and the corresponding RFP? Please see the attached documentation. Exhibit 1: RFP for the Engineering, Production and Distribution of CT-Network dated 8/31/11. Exhibit 2: Q&A for the Engineering, Production and Distribution of CT-Network dated 9/16/11. Exhibit 3: Contract for the Engineering, Production and Distribution of CT-Network dated 11/1/11 - 10/31/16. Exhibit 4: Contract Amendment for the Engineering, Production and Distribution of CT-Network dated 8/8/16. 1 The Connecticut General Assembly Joint Committee on Legislative Management Donald E. Williams, Jr. Christopher G. Donovan Senate President Pro Tempore Speaker of the House Martin M. Looney, Senate Majority Leader J. Brendan Sharkey, House Majority Leader John McKinney, Senate Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero, Jr., House Republican Leader D’Ann Mazzocca, Ph.D. Executive Director REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, PRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION FOR THE CONNECTICUT NETWORK CONTRACT #: JCLM11REG0038 RFP ISSUANCE DATE: August 31, 2011 PROPOSAL DUE DATE: September 30, 2011 TIME: 12:00 pm (noon) Attention A non-mandatory meeting and walk-through meeting will be held on Thursday, September 8, 2011, in Public Hearing Room 1C at the Legislative Office Building at 2 PM. Attention Please affix the following label to the front of the envelope containing your Proposal to this Request For Proposal. SEALED PROPOSAL TITLE - REQUEST ENGINEERING, PRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION FOR PROPOSAL SERVICES FOR THE CONNECTICUT NETWORK CONTRACT ID: JCLM11REG0038 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT: September 30, 2011 @ 12:00 pm (noon) CONTACT NAME: Tina Nadeau Mohr Suite 5100 * Legislative Office Building * Hartford, CT 06106-1591 * (860) 240-0100 * fax (860) 240-0122 * [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Terminology ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Official Agency Contact Information............................................................................................... 2 1.4 Portal Website................................................................................................................................... 2 PART 2 PROJECT SCOPE ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Overview........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Current Operational Details .............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Proposal Requirements ................................................................................................................... 12 PART 3 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................. 30 3.1 Administrative Documentation ....................................................................................................... 30 3.2 Technical Documentation ............................................................................................................... 31 PART 4 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS .......................................................................................... 40 4.1 Mandatory Requirements................................................................................................................ 40 4.2 Qualitative Elements....................................................................................................................... 40 4.3 Presentation..................................................................................................................................... 40 4.4 Debriefing Procedure...................................................................................................................... 40 PART 5 CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS ........................................................................................... 41 5.1 Contract Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 41 5.2 Formation of a Contract.................................................................................................................. 51 5.3 Contract Breach .............................................................................................................................. 52 5.4 Accounting Records........................................................................................................................ 53 5.5 Work Product .................................................................................................................................. 53 5.6 Renewal of Contract ....................................................................................................................... 53 5.7 Contractor Guarantees .................................................................................................................... 53 5.8 Freedom of Information.................................................................................................................. 54 5.9 Human Rights and Opportunities.................................................................................................... 55 5.10 Restrictions on Communications .................................................................................................. 62 5.11 Executive Orders........................................................................................................................... 63 PART 6 PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................. 63 6.1 Issue the RFP .................................................................................................................................. 63 6.2 Meeting and Walk-Through............................................................................................................ 63 6.3 Deadline for Questions ................................................................................................................... 64 6.4 Amendments to Request for Proposal............................................................................................. 64 6.5 Proposal Delivery............................................................................................................................ 64 6.6 Presentations ................................................................................................................................... 64 6.7 Contract Award and Process ........................................................................................................... 64 PART 7 RESERVED RIGHTS.............................................................................................................. 64 7.1 Rights .............................................................................................................................................. 64 7.2 Disqualification for submitting Proposals ...................................................................................... 65 i ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Corporate Resolution and Proof of Authorization Form Attachment B Certification Form Attachment C Pricing Page Attachment D Gift and Campaign Contribution Ban Acknowledgement Form Attachment E Proposal Checklist Attachment F CHRO Notification Bidder / Contract Compliance Monitoring Report Attachment G Vendor Profile Form Attachment H W-9 Form Attachment I Insurance Certificate Attachment J Nondiscrimination Certification Attachment K Legislative Operating Agreement SCHEDULES Schedule A List of Current Job Positions Schedule B Current Job Position Descriptions Schedule C Summary of Videotape/DVD Sales Schedule D Video Content Distribution Policy Schedule E Chart Detailing Breakdown of CT-N Programming Schedule F CT-N Coverage Map Schedule G List of Towns and Cable Systems CT-N is Aired On Schedule H List of CGA-Owned CT-N Equipment ii Schedule I List of CPAN-Owned CT-N Equipment Schedule J CPAN Equipment Repair Costs by Year iii PART 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Executive Summary The Connecticut General Assembly
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Directory CONNECTICUT
    52 Congressional Directory CONNECTICUT CONNECTICUT (Population 2010, 3,574,097) SENATORS RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Democrat, of Greenwich, CT; born in Brooklyn, NY, February 13, 1946; son of Martin and Jane Rosenstock Blumenthal; education: graduated, Riverdale Country School, Riverdale, NY, 1963; B.A., government, Harvard College, Cambridge, MA, 1967; J.D., Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, 1973; admitted to Connecticut Bar, 1976; admitted to District of Columbia Bar, 1977; appointed United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, 1977–81; Connecticut State House of Representatives, 1984–87; Connecticut State Senate, 1987–90; elected Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, 1990, reelected in 1994, 1998, 2002, and 2006; military: served in the United States Marine Corps Reserves, 1970–76, honorably discharged as Sergeant; married: Cynthia M. Blumenthal; four children: Matthew, Michael, David, and Claire; committees: ranking member, Veterans’ Affairs; Armed Services; Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Judiciary; Special Committee on Aging; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 2, 2010. Office Listings http://blumenthal.senate.gov 706 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 ....................................................... (202) 224–2823 Chief of Staff.—Laurie Rubiner. FAX: 224–9673 Legislative Director.—Ethan Saxon. Scheduling Director.—Dana Sandman. Communications Director.—Josh Zembik. 90 State House Square, 10th Floor, Hartford, CT 06103 .......................................................... (860) 258–6940
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNING Magazine April 2018
    THE STATES AND LOCALITIES April 2018 MouseThe 800lb. Trying to govern in Anaheim, the ultimate one-company town GOV04_Cover.indd 18 3/12/18 11:50 AM __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN PROTECTING THE PUBLIC SECTOR FROM RANSOMWARE State and local government agencies are being held hostage by À´¿¼¶¼ÂÈÆ´·É¸Åƴż¸Æ´Á·ÆÂìʴŸ·¸Æ¼ºÁ¸·ÇÂÆǸ´¿·´Ç´ How prepared is your organization to deal with a ransomware attack? Take 3 minutes to learn more: att.com/govsecurity ACCESS GRANTED AT&T FIREWALLS Fully managed security services to help prevent unauthorized ACCESS DENIED access to your network AT&T THREAT MANAGER At-a-glance, situational threat awareness for multiple sites and “state of the org” view AT&T CYBERSECURITY VULNERABILITY CONSULTING ASSESSMENT Lifecycle approach to vulnerability, threat management and path to compliance AT&T SECURE EMAIL GATEWAY ¸ÆǼÁ¶¿´ÆƸÀ´¼¿è¿Ç¸Å¼Áº and threat detection All AT&T Cybersecurity solutions are powered by AT&T Threat Intellect. © 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Report
    GRADUATE REPORT Serving Non-Profits Faculty News Around Campus Profiles Alumni Awards Dinner Giving Back Class Notes Spring/Summer 2011 etter from the Dean Dear Graduates: L Summer session is going full tilt and the beautiful May morning on which Attorney General Jepsen addressed the Class of 2011 has made way for a glorious July 4 weekend. I am grateful for the invigorating effect of New England’s change of seasons as we begin planning a new school year. There is much work to do. Legal educators everywhere are facing a changing profession in which entry level jobs are growing scarce, and in which greater rewards are going to smaller numbers of lawyers. Conceptual dexterity and analytical rigor, long the hallmarks of our craft, are no longer sufficient to guarantee success. Law schools must adapt our curricula accordingly. Professor Paul Chill will lead a review of our program to determine what reforms might best fit our students’ objectives. We welcome your ideas. Harsh economics have also driven down law school applications by roughly 11% nationally. We have been hit by a decline in the number of candidates for our evening program. Building a class from a smaller pool puts enormous pressure on our entering statistics and further harms our U.S. News ranking, even as our academic program continues to soar. Professor Peter Lindseth will lead a committee considering ways to respond to this changing market. As we prepare for the future, there is much to celebrate about the fabulous year just past. The University attracted Susan Herbst, a warm, thoughtful, energetic, and articulate academic administrator to serve as its first woman president.
    [Show full text]
  • The Affordability of Overall Shelter Costs, It Creates Significant Business Risks for the State’S Utilities As Well;
    HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP: 2011 Connecticut Legislative Districts Prepared for: Operation Fuel Bloomfield, Connecticut Pat Wrice, Executive Director Prepared by: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics Belmont, Massachusetts December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………….. i Table of Tables…………………………………………………….……… iii The Home Energy Affordability Gap in Connecticut……………………... 1 Home Energy Affordability Gap Reaches into Moderate Income……....... 3 Home Energy Burdens…………………………………………………….. 5 Federal LIHEAP Coverage……………………………………………....... 6 Basic Family Needs Budgets……………………………………………… 7 What Contributes to the Inability to Meet Basic Needs Budget………… 10 Overall Median Income………………………………………………… 10 Mean Income by Poverty Level………………………………………… 10 The Particular Needs of the Working Poor…………………………….. 11 Impact of Energy Prices on Total Shelter Costs…………………………... 13 The Consequences of Home Energy Unaffordability in 14 Connecticut………………………………………………………………... The “Social Problems” of Home Energy Unaffordability………………. 15 Public Health Implications……………………………………………. 15 Nutrition Implications…………………………………………………. 17 Public Safety Implications…………………………………………….. 19 The Competitiveness of Business and Industry……………………….. 20 Connecticut Home Energy Affordability Gap: 2011 Page i Summary………………………………………………………………. 22 The “Business Problems” of Home Energy Unaffordability……………. 22 Home Energy Burdens and Utility Bill Payment Problems…………... 23 Utility Bill Payment Problems………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN in STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP 2019 in 2019, 2,129, Or 28.8% of the 7,383 State Legislators in the United States Are Women
    WOMEN IN STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP 2019 In 2019, 2,129, or 28.8% of the 7,383 state legislators in the United States are women. Women currently hold 510, or 25.9%, of the 1,972 state senate seats and 1,619, or 29.9%, of the 5,411 state house or assembly seats. Since 1971, the number of women serving in state legislatures has more than quintupled. In 2019, of the 352 state legislators holding leadership positions1 nationwide, 77, or 21.9%, are women. Women hold 38, or 23.6%, of the 161 leadership positions in state senates and 39, or 20.4%, of the 191 leadership positions in state houses. Women hold leadership positions in 29 state senates and in 28 state houses; in 12 states, women do not hold leadership positions in either chamber. The party breakdown for women serving in state legislative leadership positions is: Total Legislature State Senate State House Total Total Percent Total Total Percent Total Total Percent Women Leadership Women Women Leadership Women Women Leadership Women Total 77 352 21.9 38 161 23.6 39 191 20.4 D 58 163 35.6 28 72 38.9 30 91 33.0 R 19 187 10.2 10 88 11.4 9 99 9.1 I/NP 2 0 2 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 1 -- In 2019, five women serve as senate presidents and twelve women serve as senate presidents pro tempore; seven women serve as speakers, and eleven serve as speakers pro tempore of state houses. Fourteen women of color hold leadership positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Yeshiva of New Haven Edgewood Elm Housing
    YESHIVA OF NEW HAVEN ·- EDGEWOOD ELM HOUSING Thirty-'Fifth cA"nniversary (jathering in honor of HONORABLE MARTIN M. LOONEY CONNECTICUT STATE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History N ew Haven, Connecticut 29 Sivan 5772 j une 19, 2012 /\.~ ~'~' :>j>)l·~ ~ ,.$ 7·~. ODD _, ooo ~e. f, DOD .S DOD f. DOD J DOD ______________ .r DOD ~ ~ DOD DOD ~ ------------------------------------ DOD Program Greeting .... ............... ....................Rabbi Mordechai E. Feuerstein Spiritual Leader, Suburban Torah Center - Livingston, New Jersey Address ...........................................Robert C. 'Bud' McFarlane Chairman and CEO, McFarlane Associates, Inc. National Security Advisor to President Ronald Reagan Civic Achievement Award ........................ Honorable Martin M. Looney Connecticut State Senate Majority Leader Remarks ............. ............................... ....... .Clifford D. May President, Foundation for Defense of Democracies Presentation ....... .. ................................. .. Rabbi Daniel Greer Founder and President Edgewood Elm Housing & Yeshiva of New Haven Salutation ......................................Honorable John DeStefano, Jr. Mayor, City of New Haven Appreciation ............................................Rabbi Aviad S. Hack Joumal Chairman The Chairman of the Program this evening is Honorable John A. Keyes, Judge, New Haven Probate Court /\.~ ~'~' :>j>l>·~ ~ ..$' l·u ODD -!' ooo ~e DOD t 6 DOD ___________________________________________________________________ ? BBBDOD 4 The
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders of the General Assembly
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Joint Committee on Legislative Management wishes to thank Information Technology employee Robert Caroti for the cover photograph of the State Capitol. Also thank you to the legislators and staff who participated in the selection of this year’s photo. LEADERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE President Pro Tempore, Martin M. Looney Majority Leader, Bob Duff Chief Deputy President Pro Tempore and Federal Relations Liaison, Joseph J. Crisco Jr. Deputy President Pro Tempore, Eric D. Coleman Deputy President Pro Tempore, John Fonfara Deputy President Pro Tempore, Joan Hartley Deputy President Pro Tempore, Carlo Leone Assistant President Pro Tempore, Steve Cassano Assistant President Pro Tempore, Cathy Osten Deputy Majority Leader, Beth Bye Deputy Majority Leader, Paul Doyle Deputy Majority Leader, Edwin Gomes Deputy Majority Leader, Andrew Maynard Assistant Majority Leader, Dante´ Bartolomeo Assistant Majority Leader, Terry Gerratana Assistant Majority Leader, Gayle Slossberg Assistant Majority Leader, Gary Winfield Majority Whip, Mae Flexer Majority Whip, Ted Kennedy, Jr. Majority Whip, Tim Larson Majority Whip, Marilyn Moore Senate Minority Leader, Leonard Fasano Senate Minority Leader Pro Tempore, Kevin Witkos Deputy Senate Minority Leader Pro Tempore/Minority Caucus Chairman, Rob Kane Chief Deputy Minority Leader, Toni Boucher Chief Deputy Minority Leader, Tony Guglielmo Chief Deputy Minority Leader, John Kissel Deputy Minority Leader, Clark Chapin Deputy Minority Leader, L. Scott Frantz Deputy Minority Leader, Michael McLachlan Assistant Minority Leader, Tony Hwang Assistant Minority Leader, Kevin Kelly Assistant Minority Leader, Art Linares Assistant Minority Leader/Screening Chairman Joe Markley Minority Whip, Paul Formica Minority Whip, Henri Martin LEADERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Speaker of the House, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Place, Suite 500 21 Oak Street Hartford, CT 06106 860-525-5641
    Cong. Assembly Senate Cong. Assembly Senate Distric Town District District District Town District District t Andover 55 4 2 Monroe 112 21, 22 4 Ansonia 104 17 3 Montville 38, 42, 139 19, 20 2 Ashford 53 35 2 Morris 66 30 5 2021-2022 Avon 17, 19 8 5 Naugatuck 70, 131 15, 17 3 Barkhams 62 8 1 22, 24, 25, BeaconFated 105 17 3 NewBritain 26 6 5 lls Berlin 30, 83 6 1 NewCanaan 125, 142 26, 36 4 Bethany 89 17 3 NewFairfield 108, 138 24 5 NewHartford 62 8 1 Bethel 2, 107 24, 26 5 92, 93, 94, Bethlehe 66 32 5 95, 96, 97, Bloomfielm 15 2, 5 1 NewHaven 116 10, 11 3 Boltond 55 4 2 Newington 24, 27, 29 9 1 Bozrah 139 20 2 NewLondon 39, 41 20 2 Branford 98, 102 12 3 NewMilford 67, 108 30 5 124, 126, 127, Newtown 2, 106, 112 28 5 Bridgepor 128, 129, 130 22, 23 4 Norfolk 64 8 5 Bridgewatt 69 32 5 NorthBranford Bristoler 77, 78, 79 31 1 86 12 3 Brookfield 107 30 5 NorthCanaan Brooklyn 50 29 2 64 30 5 Burlington 76 5 5 NorthHaven 87 11, 34 3 Canaan 64 30 5 NorthStonington 43 18 2 Canterbur 47 29 2 137, 140, Cantony 17 8 5 141, 142, Chaplin 47 35 2 Norwalk 143 25 4 Cheshire 89, 90, 103 13, 16 5 Norwich 46, 47, 139 19 2 Chester 36 33 2 OldLyme 23 20 2 Clinton 35 33 2 OldSaybrook Colcheste 34, 48 33 2 23 20, 33 2 r Colebrook 63 8 1 114, 117, Columbia 8 19 2 Orange 119 14 3 Cornwall 64 30 5 Oxford 131 32 4 Coventry 8 35 2 Plainfield 44, 45 18 2 Cromwell 32 9 1 Plainville 22 31 5 2, 107, 108, Plymouth 78 31 5 LEGISLATIVE DIRECTORY Danbury 109, 110, 138 24 5 Pomfret 50 35 2 Darien 141, 147 25, 27 4 Portland 32 33 1 DeepRive 36 33 2 Preston 42 18 2 Derbyr 104,
    [Show full text]
  • Raised H.B. No. 6489 Public Act No
    Bill History Session Year 2011 Raised H.B. No. 6489 Public Act No. 11-207 [pdf] House Schedule A LCO# 7900 [pdf] Bill Analysis for File Copy 594 Bill Analysis for File Copy 898 File No. 594 [pdf] File No. 898 [pdf] Fiscal Note for HB-6489, As Amended by House "A" (LCO Fiscal Note for File Copy 594 7900) Fiscal Note for File Copy 898 Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO 7770 Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO 8053 7900 Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO JUD Joint Fav. Rpt 8054 House LCO Amendment #7770 [pdf] House LCO Amendment #8053 [pdf] House LCO Amendment #8054 [pdf] Raised Bill [pdf] JUD Joint Favorable [pdf] APP Joint Favorable [pdf] APP Vote Tally Sheet [pdf] JUD Vote Tally Sheet [pdf] JUD Vote Tally Sheet-A [pdf] House Roll Call Vote 267 AS AMENDED Senate Roll Call Vote 535 Introducer(s): Judiciary Committee Title: AN ACT REQUIRING DNA TESTING OF PERSONS ARRESTED FOR THE COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS FELONY. Statement of Purpose: To increase the ability of law enforcement agencies to identify perpetrators of crimes by requiring persons arrested for serious felony offenses to submit to the taking of a DNA sample. Bill History: 03/01/11 REFERRED TO JOINT COMMITTEE ON Judiciary Committee 03/04/11 PUBLIC HEARING 03/09 04/06/11 JOINT FAVORABLE 04/07/11 FILED WITH LEGISLATIVE COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE 04/14/11 REFERRED TO OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH AND OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 04/19/11-5:00 PM 04/20/11 REPORTED OUT OF LEGISLATIVE COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE 04/20/11 FAVORABLE REPORT, TABLED FOR THE CALENDAR, HOUSE 04/20/11 HOUSE CALENDAR
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLUTION Awarding the TITLE of HONORARY PROFESSOR OF
    Jlrn Connecticut State University System RESOLUTION awarding THE TITLE OF HONORARY PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE CONGRESSWOMAN NANCY L. JOHNSON CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY May 7,1999 WHEREAS, Congresswoman Nancy L. Johnson has given distinguished service to the City of New Britain, the State of Connecticut, and the nation since 1976, and WHEREAS, Congresswoman Johnson has become a highly influential member of the United States Congress, serving on many important and prestigious committees and is a nationally recognized leader in health care reform, and WHEREAS, Congresswoman Nancy L. Johnson, having spoken at several major University events, guest lectured to classes from time to time, and having served as a staunch supporter of Central Connecticut State University throughout her career, is highly deserving of this honor with which she can further share her insights about the political process with the students of the university, now, therefore be it RESOLVED, That Congresswoman Nancy L. Johnson be named an Honorary Professor of Political Science at Central Connecticut State University without remuneration and be accorded all the rights and privileges pertaining thereunto throughout her lifetime. A Certified True Copy: Central Connecticut State University I Eastern Connecticut State University I Southern Connecticut State University I Western Connecticut State University CSU System Office: 39 Woodland Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06105-2337 Telephone: 860/493-0000 http:://wvw.ctstateu.edu CSU . Developing a State ofMinds CENTMIL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY Ollice sf the President New Britain, Connecticut 06050 MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. William J. Cibes, Jr. Chancellor, Connecticut State University System FROM: Richard L. Judd President w DATE: February 11,1999 SUBJECT: Honorary Professorship for Congresswoman Nancy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the House 07/14/2021
    JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE Wednesday, July 14, 2021 On Wednesday, the 14th day of July, 2021, in accordance with the Call of the Governor, the House of Representatives convened in the House Chamber in the State Capitol at Hartford at 9:30 o'clock a.m., in Special Session. The House was called to order, Speaker Matthew Ritter in the Chair. Prayer was offered by House Chaplain, Reverend Erica A. Thompson of West Hartford, Connecticut. The following is the prayer: Let us pray. Creator of fresh summer rain and glorious bursts of sunshine, of rhythms both new and ancient, of community pools and state beaches and lush hiking paths, of local farms and city parades and children's camps - we give you thanks this morning! For the myriad of ways we see, hear, feel and experience You - showing up and showing out in the world around us - we give thanks! Be with these faithful servants, gathered here in this place - and those who are connected virtually - give to each the clarity and wisdom needed to have positive dialogue, and then to make good and sound decisions on behalf of all of us in the great State of Connecticut. Creator of us all, we implore Your spirit today, tomorrow and in all the days to come. In Your imaginative name and power, we pray. Amen. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Representative O'Dea of the 125th District. The reading of the Call of the Session was waived, and the Speaker ordered that the Call be printed in the Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Voting Behavior
    Meet the New Legislature, Same as the Old Legislature A quantitative analysis of the Connecticut Citizens’ Election Program October 2012 Jason Farrell, Sean Parnell & Brett Sullivan Center for Competitive Politics October 2012 Issue Review Center for Competitive Politics 124 S. West Street, Suite 201 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 http://www.campaignfreedom.org Introduction The 2008 election cycle was the first in Connecticut in which candidates for state legislature could choose to accept taxpayer dollars to fund their campaigns, replacing the traditional system of private, voluntary contributions from citizens. Supporters of the new system believed that removing private money from campaigns would change politics in the state. But this report demonstrates that, at least when it comes to casting votes on legislation, Connecticut lawmakers remain committed to the same legislative priorities. There is no evidence that private campaign There is no evidence that private contributions were securing policy campaign contributions were securing outcomes, or that removing private policy outcomes, or that removing money changes or improves legislative private money changes or improves behavior in any way. legislative behavior in any way In late 2005 the Connecticut legislature passed the Citizens’ Election Program (CEP), which was signed by newly-installed Governor Jodi Rell. This program was created in the wake of the resignation of former governor John Rowland, who was forced to resign from office in 2004 after it was revealed that he had accepted gifts from private contractors seeking state contracts. Rowland later pleaded guilty to related corruption charges, and served time in jail. Additionally, former state treasurer Paul Sylvester pleaded guilty to accepting bribes in 1999, Bridgeport mayor Joseph Ganim was convicted in 2003 on 16 counts related to corruption, and state senator Ernest Newton pleaded guilty in 2005 to accepting a bribe.
    [Show full text]