Metopograpsus oceanicus (Crustacea: Brachyura) in Hawai‘i and Guam: Another Recent Invasive?1 Gustav Paulay2 Abstract: The grapsid crab Metopograpsus oceanicus ( Jacquinot, 1852) is recorded from the Hawaiian Islands for the first time; it appears to be established at least in Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay on O‘ahu. I review the ecology of the species in Oceania and argue that it was introduced both to the Hawaiian Islands and Guam, likely by shipping traffic. A brief review of Metopograpsus in the Hawaiian Islands is also presented. Invasions by nonindigenous species are cies. In both Hawai‘i and Guam many non- one of the greatest threats to island ecosys- indigenous species remain limited to large tems. Although nonindigenous species re- lagoonal systems (Paulay et al. 2002, Coles main less common in the sea than on land, et al. 2006). In the Mariana Islands, Apra hundreds of marine species have become es- Harbor on Guam is the only deep-water la- tablished in U.S. waters, including the Ha- goon, and the majority of nonindigenous spe- waiian Islands (Coles et al. 1999, 2002, Ruiz cies in the archipelago are known from there et al. 1997, 2000). Marine invasions are most (Paulay et al. 2002). In the Hawaiian Islands prevalent in estuaries, lagoons, and other large most invaders have become established in enclosed marine systems favored for harbors Pearl Harbor and Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay on O‘ahu, and home to specialized biotas. In these hab- the only deep-water lagoon systems in the itats nonindigenous species are now often main Hawaiian Islands (Coles et al. 1999, major and even dominant components of the 2002). biota, with cascading impacts on trophic webs, Carlton (1996) suggested several lines of community structure, and survival of indige- evidence that can be used to recognize nonin- nous species (e.g., Lee et al. 2003, Thompson digenous species, with appearance of a species 2005). in a well-studied biota being the most direct Marine nonindigenous species on Pacific and convincing. Hawaiian invertebrates have islands remain understudied, although several received uneven attention, with most taxa surveys over the past decade have increased substantially understudied, limiting the effi- our knowledge greatly. In Oceania the Ha- cacy of this criterion in many groups. Near- waiian Islands (Coles et al. 1999, 2002, 2006, shore brachyuran crabs, however, are among and others), American Samoa (Coles et al. the best known, thanks to the detailed study 2003), and Guam (Paulay et al. 1997, 2002) provided them during the middle of the are best documented for nonindigenous spe- twentieth century by C. H. Edmondson, the most prolific worker on Hawaiian marine in- vertebrates. 1 The Guam nonindigenous species survey was funded by SeaGrant; the visit to Hawai‘i was funded by Genus Metopograpsus H. Milne Edwards, NSF PEET DEB-0529724. Manuscript accepted 5 May 1853 2006. 2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Six species are recognized in the most recent Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800 (phone: 352- revision of Metopograpsus (Banerjee 1960), two 392-1721, ext. 476; fax: 352-846-0287; e-mail: paulay@ of which have been recorded from the Ha- flmnh.ufl.edu). waiian Islands: Metopograpsus thukuhar (Owen, 1839) and Metopograpsus messor (Forsska˚l, Pacific Science (2007), vol. 61, no. 2:295–300 1775) (Edmondson 1959). The distinction : 2007 by University of Hawai‘i Press between these crabs is subtle, and both Twee- All rights reserved die (1949) and Banerjee (1960) considered M. 295 Metopograpsus oceanicus in Hawai‘i and Guam . Paulay 297 messor to be restricted to the western Indian night and one day low tide, mostly around Ocean. Edmondson’s (1959) conclusion that the ocean side of the islet, and 16 crab species both are present in the Hawaiian Islands was and some other invertebrates collected. One based on his observation that the antennal fla- of the crabs encountered, Metopograpsus oce- gellum was excluded from the orbital hiatus anicus, represents a new record for the Ha- (M. messor) in most specimens but entered it waiian Islands and appears to be a recently in some (M. thukuhar). Edmondson’s (1959) established invasive. The species was identi- figure of the first male pleopod of his M. mes- fied based on Tweedie (1949) and Banerjee sor, however, matches the distinctive gonopod (1960) and also compared with holdings at uf of M. thukuhar (compare his fig. 7b with previously identified from the same sources. Tweedie’s [1949] fig. 1f ), suggesting that probably only a single, variable species is rep- results resented. The two males from Hawai‘i avail- able to me (uf 2126) both have an open Metopograpsus oceanicus ( Jacquinot, 1852) orbital hiatus and typical M. thukuhar gono- Figure 1A,B,C,E,F pods. Additional specimens and study are needed to evaluate whether one variable or Two species of Metopograpsus have an ante- two species occur in Hawai‘i. Poupin (1994, rolateral tooth behind the exorbital tooth: 1996, 2006) made a similar observation re- M. oceanicus and M. quadridentatus Stimpson, garding the purported occurrence of these 1858 (Banerjee 1960). Metopograpsus oceanicus two species in French Polynesia; again all re- can be readily distinguished by a characteris- cent, reliable records pertain to M. thukuhar. tic row of setae on the posterior surface of Similarly, all Pacific material on hand at the the propodus and dactylus of the first three Florida Museum of Natural History (Univer- walking legs (Figure 1B); by an acute and sity of Florida: uf ) for this complex, includ- keeled, rather than obtuse and unkeeled, sub- ing specimens from the Philippines, Mariana, orbital tooth; as well as by its distinctive first Fiji, Tuvalu, Caroline, Society, Tuamotu, and male pleopod, with a short, terminal, trum- Gambier Islands, pertain to M. thukuhar.Itis petlike, flared, corneous extension (Figure interesting to note that the inclusion versus 1E, Tweedie 1949, Banerjee 1960). All mate- exclusion of the antennae from the orbital hi- rial examined, including the Hawaiian speci- atus is the classical character distinguishing mens, are typical M. oceanicus. This species Pachygrapsus (included) from Metopograpsus tends to be darker than M. messor (Figure (excluded), even though Metopograpsus is vari- 1D); it is mottled in black, brown, and light able in this regard; the distinction between tan. Chelae (Figure 1F ) are violet in life as these genera clearly requires study (Poupin in M. thukuhar but lack the light spotting et al. 2005). that characterizes claws of the latter. Metopo- grapsus oceanicus has a distinctly trapezoidal, materials and methods posteriorly narrowing carapace, whereas that of M. thukuhar is more quadrate. The dis- During a visit to the Hawai‘i Institute of Ma- tinctive shape and color allow rapid field sep- rine Biology in February 2006, I had a chance aration of the two, even from a distance. to look briefly at nearshore invertebrates on material examined. uf 8605: O‘ahu, Coconut Island in Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay. Reef-flat Coconut Island, supratidal, on concrete re- and shore habitats were searched during one taining wall of interior lagoon at night, 28 H___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure 1. Metopograpsus oceanicus (A,B,C,E,F ), M. thukuhar (D). A, M. oceanicus female (uf 8605); note extra antero- lateral tooth on carapace (arrow). B, Close-up of right second walking leg of (A); note row of setae in groove on pro- podus and dactylus (arrow). C, M. oceanicus male (uf 8606). D, M. thukuhar female (uf 8608). E, 1st pleopod of (C). F, Ventral view of (C); note lack of spotting on chela. Scale bar: 1 cm (A, C, D). All habitus photos are of fresh animals from Coconut Island. 298 PACIFIC SCIENCE . April 2007 February 2006, coll. G. Paulay, 1 female, car- based publications already mentioned, so a apace width 31 mm, carapace length 25 mm brief summary of its occurrence on Guam is (Figure 1A,B). presented here. Metopograpsus oceanicus was uf 8606: O‘ahu, Coconut Island, supratidal encountered only in Apra Harbor, even on prop root of Rhizophora mangle, 3 March though extensive biodiversity surveys were 2006, coll. G. Paulay, male, carapace width carried out around much of the island. In 26 mm, carapace length 20 mm (Figure Apra Harbor it was largely localized to artifi- 1C,E,F ). cial substrata: concrete seawalls, sides of large uf 105: Guam, Apra Harbor, inner harbor vessels, and navigational and mooring buoys. mooring buoy, 16 September 1998, coll. G. It was locally common on these substrata in Paulay, 2 females, 1 male. the most-protected, landward parts of Apra uf 103: Guam, Apra Harbor, W face of Harbor, usually on vertical or near-vertical Drydock Island, above waterline on wharf, 6 surfaces, 0–2 m above the waterline, running October 1996, coll. G. Paulay, 3 males. rapidly when disturbed. I saw it in four areas uf 3172: Guam, Apra Harbor, on mooring of Apra Harbor: (1) the extensively modified buoy 16, 13 26.74 0 N, 144 38.540 E, 23 Au- Inner Harbor, which serves as the major mil- gust 2000, coll. G. Paulay, 1 female, 3 males. itary port on Guam, where it was common uf 2280: Palau Islands, Iwayama Bay Sys- on wharf walls; (2) Drydock Island Penin- tem: cave in bay past Omodes, 17 March sula, where it was common on seawalls and 1996, coll. G. Paulay, 1 male. wharves; (3) the northeastern harbor around uf 3811: Palau, Iwayama Bay System: hid- the commercial port and Piti channel, where den cove along N shore of Ulebeschel Island, again it was encountered on seawalls; and (4) ‘‘Bay of the Dragon Palace,’’ supratidal in on navigational buoys in the eastern end of notch on limestone, 7 18.81 0 N, 134 29.250 the main body of Apra Harbor (Paulay et al.