DOCSLIB.ORG

Perhaps the Largest Failure of Leadership in U.S. History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perhaps the Largest Failure of Leadership in U.S. History Perhaps the Largest Failure of Leadership in U.S. History Helio Fred Garcia Leaders are judged based on how they deal with their most difficult challenges. Inspired leaders rise to the occasion and ignite and inspire their people to a common purpose. Ineffective or malign leaders fail to rise to the challenges before them, and almost always make matters even worse. In two of my books – The Agony of Decision and Reputation Management – I describe the ten most common mis-steps in crisis response. Crisis Mis-Steps #1 & #2 The most common mis-step is to ignore or deny a problem. In the aftermath of the U.S. government’s botched response to Hurricane Katrina, the late General Electric CEO Jack Welch reflected on a common pattern of ineffective crisis management. In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, he described predictable stages of crises that are handled poorly: “The first stage of that pattern is denial…” Welch says that one of the hallmarks of good leadership is to acknowledge the reality of what is happening without denial. He says leaders need to, “dispense with denial quickly and look into the hard stuff with eyes open.” And he describes the temperament that is best suited to handle crises: “a forthright, calm, fierce boldness.”* *(“The five stages of crisis-management” by Jack Welch,The Wall Street Journal, September 14, 2005, p. A20. No longer available online free of charge.) The second most common mis-step is to diminish the significance of the problem. In The Agony of Decision I identify the U.S. Roman Catholic Church’s ignoring, diminishing, and hiding the systemic abuse of children by priests for decades as a signal example of these two mis-steps, and as one of the worst handled crises of all time. But now there’s another, and it may be even worse. As write this post, the United States is about to reach two hundred thousand confirmed COVID-19 deaths, with about one thousand two hundred Americans dying from the virus every day. The Ten Most Common Crisis Mis-Steps, as articulated in Reputation Management: The Key to Successful Public Relations and Corporate Communication Trump Admits in March That He Is Downplaying COVID-19 In the last ten days, we learned thatWashington Post associate editor Bob Woodward has recordings of 19 conversations with President Donald Trump, 18 of which served as the basis for his some of the content in his just-published book, Rage. According to Woodward, on January 28, 2020, U.S. National Security Advisor Robert C. O’Brien told Trump that COVID-19 would be, “the biggest national security threat you face in your presidency.” In a call Trump made to Woodward on February 7, Trump described what he knew about COVID-19: “It goes through air, Bob, so it’s tougher than the touch. But the air, you just breathe the air. That’s how it’s passed.” He then explained that COVID-19 is more deadly than flu: “It’s also more deadly than even your most strenuous flus. You know, people don’t realize this, we lose 25,000, 30,000 people a year [to the flu] here. Who would ever think that, right? This is more deadly. This is five percent [death rate] versus one percent or less than one percent [for the flu], you know, so this is deadly stuff.” A Washington Post analysis by reporters Robert Costa and Phil Rucker notes, “At that time, Trump was telling the nation that the virus was no worse than a seasonal flu, predicting it would soon disappear and insisting that the U.S. government had it totally under control.” On March 19, when there were 265 confirmed COVID-19 fatalities in the U.S., Trump told Woodward that he was aware that young people and children could catch the disease: “It’s not just old people, Bob. Today and yesterday some startling facts came out. It’s not just old people. Young people too, plenty of young people.” But he also told Woodward that he was playing down the risks: “To be honest with you, I wanted to always play it down. I still like playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.” It is not clear what he meant by creating a panic, since many observers have pointed out that Trump doesn’t mind scaring people about other topics. My own sense is that he was worried about panicking Wall Street and causing the stock market to crash. Indeed, the S&P had fallen 34 percent in the month before this interview, and the Dow Jones Industrial Index was about to complete its worst first quarter since 1987. Woodward notes that the tone was set at the top, but that others in the White House also denied the severity of the pandemic. He told The Post’s Philip Rucker: “I think there was denial across the board… [Trump is] a one- man band [who is] going to do what he wants to do on impulse or on information he has… He’s a bulldozer to the staff and, quite frankly, to the country… And he just says what he wants, and so there’s no control. And this is one of the problems of the Trump presidency, that he doesn’t build a team. He doesn’t plan.” On April 5, 2020, Trump told Woodward, “It’s a horrible thing. It’s unbelievable. Can you believe it? It moves rapidly and viciously. If you’re the wrong person and if it gets you, your life is pretty much over. If you’re in the wrong group; it’s our age group.” On April 13, 2020, Trump told Woodward, “It’s so easily transmissible. You wouldn’t even believe it… This thing is a killer if it gets you. If you’re the wrong person, you don’t have a chance. So this rips you apart. It is a plague.” Crisis Mis-Step #5: Lie The fifth common crisis mis-step is to lie. The Washington Post has documented the scope and frequency of Trump lying while president: In his first 827 days in office he told 10,000 lies or false statements, he told 10,000 more in the next 444 days. By July 2020, he was averaging 23 lies or false statements per day. And Woodward’s book now reveals just how dangerous Trump’s lies were. In his interviews with Woodward, Trump acknowledged knowing the following about COVID-19: It is spread in the air. You catch it by breathing it. Young people can get it. It is far deadlier than the flu. It’s easily transmissible. If you’re the wrong person and it gets you, your life is pretty much over. It rips you apart. It moves rapidly and viciously. It is a plague. But he was telling the nation the opposite: The Consequences of Downplaying the Severity of the Pandemic As the president was downplaying the pandemic, there was no whole of government response, no national testing policy, no national masking policy, and no agreement on the severity of the disease. And tens of thousands died. On September 10, Dr. Irwin Redlener, founding director of Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness and director of its Pandemic Resource & Response Initiative, told The Daily Beast that Trump, “has blood on his hands.” Dr. Redlener elaborated, “If we had the leadership we needed, I’m pretty certain we would have been under 100,000 fatalities—and probably under 50,000 if we had been aggressive from the beginning.” The Daily Beast explained, “Redlener didn’t just pull that number out of thin air. In a May study, Redlener’s Columbia University colleague Jeffrey Shaman and co-authors simulated aggressive, coordinated, ‘counterfactual’ U.S. responses to the pandemic. They asked what might have happened if Trump had followed expert advice and locked the country down no later than early March. In that case, 35,000 American lives would have been saved through early May, Shaman and his team found. Redlenner extended that calculation through September, and concluded that as many of 150,000 of the fatalities to date could have been avoided, but were caused by Trump’s incompetence. “The pandemic didn’t have to be so bad. Other countries with better leaders avoided the worst outcomes. America has suffered among the worst possible outcomes because, in Trump, America has a weak, dishonest leader, Redlener said.” Dr. Redlener noted, “This is criminal negligence. If [Trump] didn’t have this thing called sovereign immunity, I would see this as basis for being charged with criminal negligence.’” The President Continues to Model Irresponsible Behavior Two days after Bob Woodward’s release of the audio of President Trump acknowledging that COVID-19 is airborne, transmitted through breathing, and is deadly, President Trump held a campaign rally in Michigan. There were thousands of people at the rally, with no social distancing and very few masks. CNN asked some of the attendees why they were not wearing masks. One said, “Because there’s no COVID. It’s a fake pandemic, created to destroy the United States of America.” Told that President Trump had admitted to Bob Woodward that there is a virus and it is deadly, the Trump supporter said, “That’s his opinion. The truth is that the CDC says that only less than 10,000 people have died from COVID.” Another said, “I’m not afraid. The good Lord takes care of me. If I die, I die. We gotta get this country moving.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer
    Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience. —Donald J. Trump (2004; in Remnick 2017:19) I don’t care if it’s real or not. Kill him! Kill him! 2 He’s currently President of the USA, but a scant 10 years ago, Donald Trump stepped into the squared circle, facing off against WWE owner and quintessential heel Mr. McMahon3 in the “Battle of the Billionaires” (WrestleMania XXIII). The stakes were high. The loser would have his head shaved by the winner. (Spoiler alert: Trump won.) Both Trump and McMahon kept their suits on—oversized, with exceptionally long ties—in a way that made their heads appear to hover, disproportionately small, over their bulky (Trump) and bulked up (McMahon) bodies. As avatars of capitalist, patriarchal power, they left the heavy lifting to the gleamingly exposed, hypermasculinist bodies of their pro-wrestler surrogates. McMahon performed an expert heel turn: a craven villain, egging the audience to taunt him as a clueless, elitist frontman as he did the job of casting Trump as an (unlikely) babyface, the crowd’s champion. For his part, Trump seemed more mark than smart. Where McMahon and the other wrestlers were working around him, like ham actors in an outsized play, Trump was shooting the match: that is, not so much acting naturally as neglecting to act at all. He soaked up the cheers, stalked the ring, took a fall, threw a sucker punch, and claimed victory as if he (and he alone) had fought the good fight (WWE 2013b).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Donald J. Trump†
    THE AGE OF THE WINNING EXECUTIVE: THE CASE OF DONALD J. TRUMP† Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash∗ INTRODUCTION The election of Donald J. Trump, although foretold by Matt Groening’s The Simpsons,1 was a surprise to many.2 But the shock, disbelief, and horror were especially acute for the intelligentsia. They were told, guaranteed really, that there was no way for Trump to win. Yet he prevailed, pulling off what poker aficionados might call a back- door draw in the Electoral College. Since his victory, the reverberations, commotions, and uproars have never ended. Some of these were Trump’s own doing and some were hyped-up controversies. We have endured so many bombshells and pur- ported bombshells that most of us are numb. As one crisis or scandal sputters to a pathetic end, the next has already commenced. There has been too much fear, rage, fire, and fury, rendering it impossible for many to make sense of it all. Some Americans sensibly tuned out, missing the breathless nightly reports of how the latest scandal would doom Trump or why his tormentors would soon get their comeuppance. Nonetheless, our reality TV President is ratings gold for our political talk shows. In his Foreword, Professor Michael Klarman, one of America’s fore- most legal historians, speaks of a degrading democracy.3 Many difficulties plague our nation: racial and class divisions, a spiraling debt, runaway entitlements, forever wars, and, of course, the coronavirus. Like many others, I do not regard our democracy as especially debased.4 Or put an- other way, we have long had less than a thoroughgoing democracy, in part ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– † Responding to Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Conspiratorial Cartoon President During Almost Comically
    Our Conspiratorial Cartoon President During Almost Comically Consequential Times December 2018, latest revisions June 12, 2020 "What we are before is like a strait, a tricky road, a passage where we need courage and reason. The courage to go on, not to try to turn back; and the reason to use reason; not fear, not jealousy, not envy, but reason. We must steer by reason, and jettison -- because much must go -- by reason." --- John Fowles, The Aristos (1970) I, Dr. Tiffany B. Twain, am convinced that we Americans could easily create a healthier, happier, fairer and more inclusive country that would give us greater cause for hope for a better future, and a country much more secure for its citizens. A main obstacle to this providentially positive potentiality is the strong opposition to such an eminently salubrious status by “conservative” rich people who want our economic and political systems to remain rigged astonishingly generously in their favor, so that they are able to gain an ever increasing monopoly on the profits made through the exploitation of working people and natural resources. A well-informed electorate is a prerequisite for ensuring that a democracy is healthy, and thereby offers all its citizens truly reasonable representation. This simple understanding makes both humorous and viscerally provocative a political cartoon by David Sipress that appeared in New Yorker magazine soon after the 2016 elections. In this cartoon, a woman ruefully observes to her male companion, "My desire to be well-informed is currently at odds with my desire to remain sane." Ha! Tens of millions of Americans find themselves in this predicament today, as the Donald Trump soap opera, crime saga, healthcare treachery, and interlude of authority abuses becomes increasingly dysfunctional, anxiety inducing and deadly -- and as Trump becomes more unhinged, sinisterly authoritarian and threatening to individual liberties, national security and our greatest American values.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 at Usc
    AILY ROJAN DMONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2020 | STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THET UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1912 | VOL. 201, NO. 17 COVID-19 AT USC — Octoer 1117 Over the wee of ct 1117, the test positivity rate for exposed/symptomatic testing was 1% and for surveillance population testing was 0% among students. CURRENT TESTING NUMBERS EXPOSED/ SYMPTOMATIC TESTING SURVEILLANCE POPULATION TESTING STUDENTS STUDENTS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES NEGATIVE: 98 NEGATIVE: 9 NEGATIVE: 2,787 NEGATIVE: 284 POSITIVE: 1 POSITIVE: 0 POSITIVE: 0 POSITIVE: 1 Design by Samantha deNicola and Claire Wong | Daily Trojan Student-led community fridge provides accessible food Local eateries donate their donated and we are pleasantly sur- finding the right area to host the prised,” Kapsner said. “I was expect- fridge. When choosing a location, excess food to the USC ing to have to go between our dona- they prioritized businesses owned CHIP fridge in Koreatown. tions to stores to get stuff to refill the by Black people and people of color. fridge, but we really haven’t needed Ultimately, the Community By JESS ZELMER to do that much. The community is Health Involvement Project decid- Staff Writer very involved, which is nice.” ed to place its community fridge at Instead of taking a step back dur- Burgerlords, a vegan burger res- ProjectQ, a nonprofit in Koreatown ing this virtual semester, the stu- taurant in Chinatown, plans to do- that provides a safe space for dent-led USC Community Health nate excess food to the community LGBTQIA+ homeless youth. Involvement Project stepped up to fridge at the end of each week.
    [Show full text]
  • Views with Most of the Key Players, Including the President
    Bob Woodward Two-Time Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist and Associate Editor of the Washington Post Bob Woodward gained international attention when he and Carl Bernstein uncovered the Watergate scandal in 1973. Since then, Watergate’s theme of secret government has driven Woodward’s tough but fair and non- partisan reporting. He pulls back the curtain on the inner workings of Washington; revealing in meticulous detail what’s really going on in the halls power. Have the lessons of Watergate been forgotten? Is the media doing its job? Woodward offers a historical perspective as only he can. Woodward has written about the last nine U.S. presidents and chronicled how the power of the presidency has evolved. He is author of 19 bestselling books – 13 were #1 – more than any contemporary nonfiction writer. His bestseller, Fear: Trump in the White House, is the deepest dive ever made into the first months of any American president. Woodward’s 20th book, Rage, goes behind the scenes of the Trump presidency like never before. Currently associate editor for The Washington Post where he’s worked since 1971, Bob Woodward has won nearly every American journalism award including two Pulitzers. Former CIA director and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wished he’d recruited Woodward into the CIA, “He has an extraordinary ability to get otherwise responsible adults to spill [their] guts to him…his ability to get people to talk about stuff they shouldn’t be talking about is just extraordinary and may be unique.” Therein lays the genius talent of Bob Woodward. No one else in political investigative journalism has the clout, respect, and reputation of Woodward.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Dad Poor
    Rich Dad Poor Dad will… • Explode the myth that you need to earn a high income to become rich • Challenge the belief that your house is an asset • Show parents why they can’t rely on the school system to teach their kids about money • Define once and for all an asset and a liability • Teach you what to teach your kids about money for their future financial success Robert Kiyosaki has challenged and changed the way tens of millions of people around the world think about money. With perspectives that often contradict conventional wisdom, Robert has earned a reputation for straight talk, irreverence and courage. He is regarded worldwide as a passionate advocate for financial education. R o b What The Rich Teach Their Kids About Money – “The main reason people struggle financially is because they e That The Poor And Middle Class Do Not! have spent years in school but learned nothing about money. r The result is that people learn to work for money… but never t learn to have money work for them.” T . – Robert Kiyosaki K i y Rich Dad Poor Dad – The #1 Personal Finance Book of All Time! o “Rich Dad Poor Dad is a starting point for anyone looking to gain control of their s financial future.” – USA TODAY a k i www.richdad.com ™ $16.95 US | $19.95 CAN Robert T. Kiyosaki “Rich Dad Poor Dad is a starting point for anyone looking to gain control of their financial future.” – USA TODAY RICH DAD POOR DAD What The Rich Teach Their Kids About Money— That The Poor And Middle Class Do Not! By Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Rage by Bob Woodward Page 1 of 3
    USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog: Book Review: Rage by Bob Woodward Page 1 of 3 Book Review: Rage by Bob Woodward Rage by Washington Post veteran Bob Woodward documents the first three-and-a-half years of Donald Trump’s presidency. Drawing from 17 interviews Woodward secured with Trump, the book ends with a discussion of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The book is an impressive piece of contemporary history, yet Robert Ledger and Peter Finn find that it is sometimes hard to fully penetrate the rambling material garnered from the interviews with Trump. Rage. Bob Woodward. 2020. Simon & Schuster. Bob Woodward’s latest book on the presidency of Donald Trump, Rage, is a departure from its predecessor, Fear, in so far as it–perhaps surprisingly–was written with the cooperation of the president. Over the course of 17 interviews, Woodward charts Trump’s opinions on a wide range of topics, including the development of the coronavirus pandemic. In fact, the book is remarkably current for a piece of political history; the last interview was completed this past summer. Woodward is one of the best-known political journalists and writers in the US. He assured his place in American history with his key role in investigating the Watergate scandal of the 1970s, which helped bring down the presidency of Richard Nixon, alongside Carl Bernstein at The Washington Post. Woodward has written several books on nine US presidents and his judgement on their performance carries a weight and significance rarely matched by other writers. Woodward makes clear his view that Trump marks a significant break from his predecessors in style and outlook.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Herbert – the New Evangelicals: How Donald Trump Revealed the Changing Christian Conservative Base In
    The New Evangelicals: How Donald Trump Revealed the Changing Christian Conservative base Michael J. Herbert Bemidji State University Political Science Senior Thesis Bemidji State University Dr. Patrick Donnay, Advisor April 2017 1 Abstract I analyze how Donald Trump, who many see as an uncertain standard bearer of Christian values, given his colored personal life and various tortured exchanges on the Bible, became the champion of Christian conservatives. Using Pew data from a January 27th, 2016 survey, I analyze how the Republican presidential candidate went from the lowest rankings of religious association just 10 months prior, to winning the highest white evangelical support since George W. Bush in 2004. More research will be conducted on how the specific group known as evangelical voters has changed, as well as what other variables such as economic, gender equality, and international policy played within the demographic that assisted in voting for president elect Donald Trump. This project will contribute to understanding the results of the 2016 presidential campaign, and specifically the behavior of the white evangelical vote. Although Donald Trump did not show significance in numerous religious variables, control variables such as Republican identity were a strong indicator for supporting Trump as a potentially great president upon his election. By analyzing changing and complex evangelical voting trends, along with the changing influence of religion on American society, I believe Donald Trump’s election win revealed a major section of the U.S. electorate’s true message: to be represented regardless of a candidate’s personal background in an increasingly secular American society. Introduction On January 27th, 2016, the Pew Research Center released a survey of 2,009 Americans concerning religion and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Board's Role in Monitoring Strategy – Lessons Learned from GE
    The Board’s Role in Monitoring Strategy: Lessons Learned from General Electric By Michael J. Berthelot, Natasha Lasensky, and Paul Somers January 14, 2019 THE BOARD’S ROLE IN MONITORING STRATEGY The Board’s Role in Monitoring Strategy: Lessons Learned from General Electric Michael J. Berthelot, Natasha Lasensky, and Paul Somers Rady School of Management University of California, San Diego Author Note Natasha Lasensky and Paul Somers are M.B.A. candidates in the Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego. Natasha Lasensky is a Project Manager in Software and Web Development at PINT Inc. Paul Somers is the Head of Programs for GKN Aerospace EPW, and responsible for program performance, profits and losses, customer satisfaction, and commercial function. Michael J. Berthelot is a lecturer in the M.B.A. program at the Rady School of Management, where he teaches the course, “The Board, the CEO, and Corporate Governance.” Berthelot has served as chief executive officer for two publicly-traded companies and on more than thirty boards over the course of his career. He currently serves on the board of a New York Stock Exchange-listed consumer products company. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael J. Berthelot, Cito Capital Corporation, P O Box 5005 PMB #5, Rancho Santa Fe CA 92067. E-mail: [email protected]. THE BOARD’S ROLE IN MONITORING STRATEGY 1 History Thomas Edison founded General Electric (GE) in 1878. During its early years, GE primarily focused on the generation and application of electricity, expanding into plastics and radio broadcasting in the early 1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • ^The Peninsula E I KOREA ECONOMIC INSTITUTE Covering the Economic and Foreign I 7 ! I -H —J JPP Policies That Impact the Korean Peninsula U 1 I C3 Lj '1
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 09/25/2020 2:34:42 PM What Woodward’s Book “Rage” Tells us about U.S.- Korea Relations September 24, 2020 ^The Peninsula E I KOREA ECONOMIC INSTITUTE Covering the economic and foreign I 7 ! i -h —j JPP policies that impact the Korean peninsula U 1 I c3 lj '1 - By Mark Tokola At least in U.S. media outlets, the main Korea story to emerge from Bob Woodward’s new book “Rage” is the correspondence between President Trump and Kim Jong-un, which is characterized as faintly ridiculous. I’ll set aside the question of whether Kim Jong-un’s letters read better in Korean, and particularly within North Korean rhetorical tradition. The language of the letters may not be that extraordinary. Perhaps odder are President Trump’s efforts to mirror the floridness of the language. For President Trump to be impressed by being called “Excellency” also shows a remarkable lack of experience with reading diplomatic correspondence, in which it is a commonplace title not only for heads of government but for all ambassadors. The more serious problem is that the letters have been made public. Exposing letters between heads of governments may close off one form of confidential communication at a time when we need all the channels of communication we can get. You get the impression, reading the whole book, that Woodward thought it a scoop to reveal how close the U.S. Government was to believing that we were to going to war with North Korea toward the end of 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of (Dis)Information: Crippled America, the 25Th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the 2016 U.S
    The Politics of (Dis)Information: Crippled America, the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign Authors Stephanie Cork, University of Maryland Paul T. Jaeger, University of Maryland Shannon Jette, University of Maryland Stefanie Ebrahimoff, Long Island University Brooklyn Abstract Politics—especially presidential campaigns—are an important means by which to examine the values and issues that are given priority by members of a society and the people who wish to be leaders of that society. The issues discussed in a campaign and the ways in which they are discussed reveal much about social attitudes and policy goals. In the past 20 years, information and communication technologies have simultaneously become central policy issues at the national level (access, privacy, security, etc.) and the main channels by which candidates engage their supporters (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc.). This paper examines the dual roles of information and communication technologies in the 2016 presidential campaign in the United States through the lens of disability issues. This particular focus was driven by the occurrence of the 25th anniversary of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) during the first year of the campaign and, more significantly, the intersection of disability, information, and technology being a major civil rights issue for people with disabilities, who represent nearly one-fifth of the population of the United States. This study collected and analyzed campaign materials about disability issues released online by selected presidential campaigns, as well as news stories and other related Web content, to better understand the issues related to disability being discussed in the campaign and the implications of those issues for people with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • GE's Talent Machine: the Making of a CEO
    9-304-049 REV: NOVEMBER 3, 2006 CHRISTOPHER A. BARTLETT ANDREW N. McLEAN GE's Talent Machine: The Making of a CEO For more than a century, General Electric (GE) had been recognized as one of the world’s leading diversified businesses, and regularly found itself at or near the top of America’s and the world’s most admired corporations. From its founding in 1878 by Thomas Edison, the company grew to be a titan in the world of electrical generation, distribution, and use—and a widely followed model of modern management practice. GE was a pioneer of centralized corporate control in the 1930s, an exemplar of the decentralized multidivisional organization form in the 1950s, a leader in strategic planning in the 1970s, and a model of the lean and agile global competitor of the 1990s. Throughout its history, GE always promoted its top leaders from its own ranks. The company’s much admired executive development practices were rooted in the cultural values put in place by Charles Coffin, the CEO who succeeded Edison in 1892. Over the next 20 years, Coffin’s commitment to creating a meritocracy based on measured performance became the foundation for a culture that was to make GE “a CEO factory” as one observer called it.1 Throughout the 20th century, this machine produced a pool of skilled managers that not only met the company’s own needs, but also became a major source of CEO talent for corporate America. So powerfully enduring was Coffin’s accomplishment that a 2003 Fortune Magazine article named him “the greatest CEO of all time.”2 On September 7, 2001, when 44-year-old Jeff Immelt was named the company’s twelfth leader after Edison, he faced a daunting challenge.
    [Show full text]