CHAPTER V CONCLUSION and SUGGESTION 5.1Conclusion 5.2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION and SUGGESTION 5.1Conclusion 5.2 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 5.1Conclusion After finishing the analysis, the writer find out that all the type of speech acts occurried in the conversations in "UP", such as : Locutionary Illocutionary Perlocutionary about the classification They are: Declarative Representative Directive Expressive Commissive In this study, the writer has found out that the illocutionary acts in "UP" are: requesting, giving help, expressing dislike, guessing, showing confuse, expressing angry, disbelieving, asserting, refusing, showing bored, showing worried, suggesting, and commanding. About the perlocutionary acts, the writer found out that responses or reaction that occurred is not always literally perlocutionary act, but also non-literally perlocutionary act. The classification that often used were directive, commissive and expressive. 5.2 Suggestion Before the writer ends the study, the writer would like to contribute some suggestions for the future researcher types of speech acts. In this study, the writer focuses to the analysis of the locutionary, illocutionary. and 39 40 perlocutionary acts. For the next researchers, the writer thinks that the following are worth researches. First, to observe about perlocutionary act, whether the perlocutionary act is success or failed. Because communicating with people, sometimes there is misunderstanding between them, and it could be influence the perlocutionary act. Second, still related to the first point, that is to observe the reason or conditions of the success or the failure of the perlocutionary act. Finally, the writer hopes that this study can gives more contributions to the study of Discourse Analysis mainly on the study of Speech Act. 41 BIBLIOGRAPHY Austin, John L, 1962. How to Do Things With Words, London : Oxford University Press Bogdan, Robert C and Sari Knopp Biklen, 1992. Qualitative Research For Education, An Introduction To Theory and Method, Syracuse University, ISBN 0-205-13266-9. Cruse, D Allan, 2000. Meaning In Language An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics, New York : Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-870010-5. Docter, Pete, Bob Peterson and Tom Mc.Charty, 2009. UP, North America : Pixar Production. Hornby, A S, 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, New York : Oxford University Press. http://www.google.com//speech acts in wikipedia//. Searle, John R, 1969. Speech Act An Essay In The Philosophy Of Language, New York : Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-521-09626-X. Tim Dosen Unwip, 2007. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi, Surabaya : Universitas Wijaya Putra. 42 SYNOPSIS In the late 1930s, young Carl Frederick is a shy, quiet boy who idolizes renowned explorer Charles F. Muntz. Muntz has been accused of fabricating the skeleton of a giant bird he claimed to have discovered in Paradise Falls in Venezuela, and vows to return there to capture one alive. One day, Carl be friends a tomboy named Ellie, who is also a Muntz fan. She confides to Carl her desire to move her "clubhouse" — an abandoned house in the neighborhood — to a cliff overlooking Paradise Falls, and makes him promise to help her. Carl and Ellie eventually get married and grow old together in the restored house, working as a toy balloon vendor and a zookeeper respectively. Unable to have children, they repeatedly pool their savings for a trip to Paradise Falls, but end up spending it on more pressing needs. An elderly Carl finally arranges for the trip, but Ellie suddenly becomes ill and dies, leaving him alone. Sometime later, Carl still lives in the house, now surrounded by urban development. Carl has refused to sell the house to the developers. He accidentally injures a construction worker over damage to his mailbox, and a court orders him to move to a retirement home. However, Carl comes up with a scheme to keep his promise to Ellie: he turns his house into a make shift airship, using thousands of helium balloons to lift it off its foundation. Russell, a young Wilderness Explorer (a fictional scouting organization), becomes an accidental passenger in his effort to earn his final married badge for assisting the elderly. After surviving a thunderstorm, the house lands near a ravine facing Paradise Falls. Carl and Russell harness themselves to the still-buoyant house and begin to walk it around the ravine, hoping to reach the falls before the balloons deflate. They later be friend a tall, colorful flightless bird (whom Russell names "Kevin") trying to reach her chicks, and a dog named Dug, who wears a special collar that allows him to speak. Carl and Russell encounter a pack of dogs led by Alpha, and are taken to Dug's master, who turns out to be an elderly Charles Muntz. Muntz invites Carl and Russell aboard his dirigible, where he explains that he has spent the years since his disgrace searching Paradise Falls for the giant bird. His decades-long isolation from the rest of the world and his obsession to catch the bird has made him paranoid, psychotic and dangerous, killing off any wanderer he sees, thinking they wanted the bird. When Russell notes the bird's similarity to Kevin, Muntz then becomes hostile, prompting the pair to flee with Kevin and Dug. Muntz eventually catches up with them and starts a fire beneath Carl's house, forcing Carl to choose between saving it or Kevin. Carl rushes to put out the fire, allowing Muntz to take the bird. Carl and Russell eventually reach the falls, but Russell is angry with Carl over his decision to save his house instead of Kevin. Settling into his home, Carl looks through Ellie's childhood scrapbook; finding photos of their happy marriage added into it, along with a note from Ellie thanking him for the "adventure" and encouraging him to go on a new one. Reinvigorated, he goes to find Russell, only to see him sailing off on some balloons to save Kevin. Carl empties the house of furniture and possessions and pursues him. 43 Russell is captured by Muntz, but Carl manages to board the dirigible in flight and free both Russell and Kevin. Dug manages to defeat Alpha and become the new leader of the dogs. Muntz pursues them around the airship, finally cornering Dug, Kevin, and Russell inside Carl's tethered house. Carl lures Kevin out through a window and back into the airship with Dug and Russell clinging to her back, just as Muntz is about to close in; Muntz leaps after them, only to snag his foot on some balloon lines and fall to his death. Snapped from its tether, the house descends out of sight through the clouds, which Carl accepts as being for the best. Carl and Russell reunite Kevin with her chicks, and then fly the dirigible back to the city. When Russell's father misses his son's Senior Explorer ceremony, Carl presents Russell with his final badge: the grape soda cap that Ellie gave to Carl when they first met. They are then enjoy some ice cream together, sitting on the curb outside the shop as Russell and his father used to do, with the dirigible parked nearby. Meanwhile, Carl's house is shown to have landed on the cliff beside Paradise Falls, as promised to Ellie. In scenes shown during the credits, Carl becomes a surrogate father to Russell and keeps Dug as his pet. Muntz's other dogs are adopted by the elderly people living in the retirement home. 44 45 46 BIOGRAPHY Pixar Animation Studios, is an American computer animation film studio based in Emeryville, California. The studio is best known for its CGI-animated feature films created with PhotoRealistic RenderMan, its own implementation of the industry-standard RenderMan image-rendering application programming interface used to generate high-quality images. Pixar began in 1979 as the Graphics Group, part of the computer division of Lucasfilm before its spin-out as a corporation in 1986 with funding by Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Jobs, who became its majority shareholder. The Walt Disney Company bought Pixar in 2006 at a valuation of $7.4 billion, a transaction which made Jobs Disney's largest shareholder. Pixar has produced fourteen feature films, beginning with Toy Story in 1995. Thirteen of the films have received both critical and financial success, with the notable exception being Cars 2, which, while commercially successful, received substantially less praise than Pixar's other productions. All fourteen films have debuted with CinemaScore ratings of at least "A-", indicating a very positive reception with audiences. The studio has also produced several short films. As of July 2013, its feature films have made over $8.3 billion worldwide, with an average worldwide gross of $597 million per film. Both Finding Nemo and Toy Story 3 are among the 50 highest-grossing films of all time, and all of Pixar's films are among the 50 highest-grossing animated films, with Toy Story 3 being the all-time highest, grossing over $1 billion worldwide. The studio has earned 27 Academy Awards, seven Golden Globe Awards, and eleven Grammy Awards, among many other awards and acknowledgments. Since the award's inauguration in 2001, most of Pixar's films have been nominated for the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, with seven winning: Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, Ratatouille, WALL-E, Up, Toy Story 3, and Brave. Up and Toy Story 3 are two of only three animated films to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture. On September 6, 2009, executives John Lasseter, Brad Bird, Pete Docter, Andrew Stanton, and Lee Unkrich were presented with the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement by the Biennale Venice Film Festival. The award was presented by Lucasfilm founder George Lucas. 47.
Recommended publications
  • Suggestions for Top 100 Family Films
    SUGGESTIONS FOR TOP 100 FAMILY FILMS Title Cert Released Director 101 Dalmatians U 1961 Wolfgang Reitherman; Hamilton Luske; Clyde Geronimi Bee Movie U 2008 Steve Hickner, Simon J. Smith A Bug’s Life U 1998 John Lasseter A Christmas Carol PG 2009 Robert Zemeckis Aladdin U 1993 Ron Clements, John Musker Alice in Wonderland PG 2010 Tim Burton Annie U 1981 John Huston The Aristocats U 1970 Wolfgang Reitherman Babe U 1995 Chris Noonan Baby’s Day Out PG 1994 Patrick Read Johnson Back to the Future PG 1985 Robert Zemeckis Bambi U 1942 James Algar, Samuel Armstrong Beauty and the Beast U 1991 Gary Trousdale, Kirk Wise Bedknobs and Broomsticks U 1971 Robert Stevenson Beethoven U 1992 Brian Levant Black Beauty U 1994 Caroline Thompson Bolt PG 2008 Byron Howard, Chris Williams The Borrowers U 1997 Peter Hewitt Cars PG 2006 John Lasseter, Joe Ranft Charlie and The Chocolate Factory PG 2005 Tim Burton Charlotte’s Web U 2006 Gary Winick Chicken Little U 2005 Mark Dindal Chicken Run U 2000 Peter Lord, Nick Park Chitty Chitty Bang Bang U 1968 Ken Hughes Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, PG 2005 Adam Adamson the Witch and the Wardrobe Cinderella U 1950 Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson Despicable Me U 2010 Pierre Coffin, Chris Renaud Doctor Dolittle PG 1998 Betty Thomas Dumbo U 1941 Wilfred Jackson, Ben Sharpsteen, Norman Ferguson Edward Scissorhands PG 1990 Tim Burton Escape to Witch Mountain U 1974 John Hough ET: The Extra-Terrestrial U 1982 Steven Spielberg Activity Link: Handling Data/Collecting Data 1 ©2011 Film Education SUGGESTIONS FOR TOP 100 FAMILY FILMS CONT..
    [Show full text]
  • 22Nd NFF Announces Screenwriters Tribute
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NANTUCKET FILM FESTIVAL ANNOUNCES TOM MCCARTHY TO RECEIVE 2017 SCREENWRITERS TRIBUTE AWARD NICK BROOMFIELD TO BE RECOGNIZED WITH SPECIAL ACHIEVEMENT IN DOCUMENTARY STORYTELLING NFF WILL ALSO HONOR LEGENDARY TV CREATORS/WRITERS DAVID CRANE AND JEFFREY KLARIK WITH THE CREATIVE IMPACT IN TELEVISION WRITING AWARD New York, NY (April 6, 2017) – The Nantucket Film Festival announced today the honorees who ​ will be celebrated at this year’s Screenwriters Tribute—including Oscar®-winning writer/director Tom McCarthy, legendary documentary filmmaker Nick Broomfield, and ground-breaking ​ ​ ​ television creators and Emmy-nominated writing team David Crane and Jeffrey Klarik. The ​ ​ ​ ​ 22nd Nantucket Film Festival (NFF) will take place June 21-26, 2017, and celebrates the art of screenwriting and storytelling in cinema and television. The 2017 Screenwriters Tribute Award will be presented to screenwriter/director Tom McCarthy. McCarthy's most recent film Spotlight was awarded the Oscar for Best Picture and won him (and ​ ​ his co-writer Josh Singer) an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. McCarthy began his career as a working actor until he burst onto the filmmaking scene with his critically acclaimed first feature The Station Agent, starring Peter Dinklage, Patricia Clarkson, Bobby Cannavale, and Michelle ​ Williams. McCarthy followed this with the equally acclaimed film The Visitor, for which he won the ​ ​ Spirit Award for Best Director. He also shared story credit with Pete Docter and Bob Peterson on the award-winning animated feature Up. Previous recipients of the Screenwriters Tribute Award ​ ​ include Oliver Stone, David O. Russell, Judd Apatow, Paul Haggis, Aaron Sorkin, Nancy Meyers and Steve Martin, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting the Sundance Curse: Exploring Discrepancies Between Film Reviews by Professional and Amateur Critics
    Dissecting the Sundance Curse by Lucas Buck — 27 Dissecting the Sundance Curse: Exploring Discrepancies Between Film Reviews by Professional and Amateur Critics Lucas Buck Cinema and Television Arts Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract There has been a growing discrepancy between professional-critic film reviews and audience-originating film reviews. In fact, these occurrences have become so routine, industry writers often reference a “Sundance Curse” – when a buzzy festival-circuit film bombs with the general public, commercially or critically. This study examines this inconsistency to determine which aspects of a film tend to draw the most attention from each respective type of critic. A qualitative content analysis of 20 individual reviews was conducted to determine which elements present in a film garnered the most attention from the reviewers, and whether that attention was positive, negative or neutral. This study indicates that audience film reviewers overwhelmingly focused on the “emotional response” gleaned from their movie-going experience above all other aspects of the film, whereas professional critics focused attention to more tangible – above-the-line contributions, such as direction, performances, and writing. I. Introduction As one of the most talked-about films of the 2018 Sundance Film Festival, theA24-released Hereditary became the breakout horror film of the year, opening in nearly 3,000 theaters and raking in $79 million while produced on just a $10 million production budget (Cusumano, 2018). Despite the obvious box office success, Hereditary’s word-of-mouth power seemed to have mostly been driven by glowing critical reviews, rather than by the opinion of audiences who paid to see the film.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibiting Product Placement and the Use of Characters in Marketing to Children by Professor Angela J. Campbell Georgetown Univ
    PROHIBITING PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND THE USE OF CHARACTERS IN MARKETING TO CHILDREN BY PROFESSOR ANGELA J. CAMPBELL1 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER (DRAFT September 7, 2005) 1 Professor Campbell thanks Natalie Smith for her excellent research assistance, Russell Sullivan for pointing out examples of product placements, and David Vladeck, Dale Kunkel, Jennifer Prime, and Marvin Ammori for their helpful suggestions. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Product Placements............................................................................................................. 4 A. The Practice of Product Placement......................................................................... 4 B. The Regulation of Product Placements................................................................. 11 II. Character Marketing......................................................................................................... 16 A. The Practice of Celebrity Spokes-Character Marketing ....................................... 17 B. The Regulation of Spokes-Character Marketing .................................................. 20 1. FCC Regulation of Host-Selling............................................................... 21 2. CARU Guidelines..................................................................................... 22 3. Federal Trade Commission....................................................................... 24
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Nemo
    FINDING NEMO FILM OVERVIEW Directors: Andrew Stanton and Lee Unkrich. Screenwriter: Andrew Stanton, Bob Peterson and David Reynolds, based on an argument of Andrew Stanton. Production: Graham Walters. Mounting: David Ian Salter. Music: Thomas Newman. Country: USA. Year: 2003. Length: 100 min. Genre: Animation. Personality: Nemo, Marlin, Dory, Gill, Bloat, Peach, Gurgl, Bubbles, Nigel, Crush, Coral, Chum, Pearl, Bruce. SYNOPSIS The film tells the story of the incredible long journey in which two fish (Marlin and his son Nemo) are forced to separate from each other in the Great Coral Reef, as Nemo is captured by a diver. The poor fish ends up in a fish tank at a dentist’s surgery from where he can see Sydney Harbour. Marlin starts a dangerous trip together with Dory, a friendly but absentminded fish, who lacks short term memory and who will help him find his son. The cautious dad finally becomes a hero of a true epic story which aims to rescue his son. On the other hand, Nemo has devised a crazy plan to go back home safe and sound. FILM DIRECTORS Andrew Stanton was one of the four Lee Unkrich (co director) made his debut scriptwriters who were nominated for the as a co director in 1999 with the Disney/Pixar Oscars in 1996 for Toy story. He continued film Toy Story 2, which won a Golden Globe. his successful career in films for Pixar: A After this he co directed Monsters,Inc. Bug’s Life, Toy story 2, Monsters Inc. and Before these feature films, he cooperated with Finding Nemo.
    [Show full text]
  • To Infinity and Back Again: Hand-Drawn Aesthetic and Affection for the Past in Pixar's Pioneering Animation
    To Infinity and Back Again: Hand-drawn Aesthetic and Affection for the Past in Pixar's Pioneering Animation Haswell, H. (2015). To Infinity and Back Again: Hand-drawn Aesthetic and Affection for the Past in Pixar's Pioneering Animation. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 8, [2]. http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue8/HTML/ArticleHaswell.html Published in: Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:28. Sep. 2021 1 To Infinity and Back Again: Hand-drawn Aesthetic and Affection for the Past in Pixar’s Pioneering Animation Helen Haswell, Queen’s University Belfast Abstract: In 2011, Pixar Animation Studios released a short film that challenged the contemporary characteristics of digital animation.
    [Show full text]
  • MONSTERS INC 3D Press Kit
    ©2012 Disney/Pixar. All Rights Reserved. CAST Sullivan . JOHN GOODMAN Mike . BILLY CRYSTAL Boo . MARY GIBBS Randall . STEVE BUSCEMI DISNEY Waternoose . JAMES COBURN Presents Celia . JENNIFER TILLY Roz . BOB PETERSON A Yeti . JOHN RATZENBERGER PIXAR ANIMATION STUDIOS Fungus . FRANK OZ Film Needleman & Smitty . DANIEL GERSON Floor Manager . STEVE SUSSKIND Flint . BONNIE HUNT Bile . JEFF PIDGEON George . SAM BLACK Additional Story Material by . .. BOB PETERSON DAVID SILVERMAN JOE RANFT STORY Story Manager . MARCIA GWENDOLYN JONES Directed by . PETE DOCTER Development Story Supervisor . JILL CULTON Co-Directed by . LEE UNKRICH Story Artists DAVID SILVERMAN MAX BRACE JIM CAPOBIANCO Produced by . DARLA K . ANDERSON DAVID FULP ROB GIBBS Executive Producers . JOHN LASSETER JASON KATZ BUD LUCKEY ANDREW STANTON MATTHEW LUHN TED MATHOT Associate Producer . .. KORI RAE KEN MITCHRONEY SANJAY PATEL Original Story by . PETE DOCTER JEFF PIDGEON JOE RANFT JILL CULTON BOB SCOTT DAVID SKELLY JEFF PIDGEON NATHAN STANTON RALPH EGGLESTON Additional Storyboarding Screenplay by . ANDREW STANTON GEEFWEE BOEDOE JOSEPH “ROCKET” EKERS DANIEL GERSON JORGEN KLUBIEN ANGUS MACLANE Music by . RANDY NEWMAN RICKY VEGA NIERVA FLOYD NORMAN Story Supervisor . BOB PETERSON JAN PINKAVA Film Editor . JIM STEWART Additional Screenplay Material by . ROBERT BAIRD Supervising Technical Director . THOMAS PORTER RHETT REESE Production Designers . HARLEY JESSUP JONATHAN ROBERTS BOB PAULEY Story Consultant . WILL CSAKLOS Art Directors . TIA W . KRATTER Script Coordinators . ESTHER PEARL DOMINIQUE LOUIS SHANNON WOOD Supervising Animators . GLENN MCQUEEN Story Coordinator . ESTHER PEARL RICH QUADE Story Production Assistants . ADRIAN OCHOA Lighting Supervisor . JEAN-CLAUDE J . KALACHE SABINE MAGDELENA KOCH Layout Supervisor . EWAN JOHNSON TOMOKO FERGUSON Shading Supervisor . RICK SAYRE Modeling Supervisor . EBEN OSTBY ART Set Dressing Supervisor .
    [Show full text]
  • The Voices of PIXAR Characters
    The Voices of PIXAR Characters Not all of the names in the word bank are used in the puzzle. Email the bonus clue to [email protected] for a chance to win a Disney pin! 1 C R U S H E 2 B L 3 4 O S L I N K Y D O G H 5 6 7 M O L T A W O O D Y 8 I P U F 9 10 M U N T Z B O P E E P G R 11 R K C E A 12 13 P Y A S F R O Z O N E 14 15 B O B P A R R L L C 16 17 18 T E E L A S T I G I R L I 19 20 21 A T X M I K E J E S S I E 22 T E R L M A 23 24 25 O S U L L E Y M A R L I N 26 27 H U D S O N S C L I 28 E O S M Q Y G A R E A U E 29 D Y B U Z Z L I G H T Y E A R L L E E R N Woody Dash Buzz Lightyear Mr Potato Head Bo Peep Wheezy Slinky Dog Rex Jessie John Stinky Pete Flik Hopper Boggs Francis Slim Sulley Rosie Mike Boo Celia Atta Marlin Dory Gill Roz Crush Bob Parr Elastigirl Dim Frozone McQueen Hudson Andy Mater Sally Molt Zurg Remy Muntz Dug Manny Russell Carl Nigel Squirt Paul ★ Holds the distinction of voicing a character in every PIXAR animated feature.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational and Therapeutic Impact of Contemporary Animated Film Characters on the Viewer
    Konteksty Pedagogiczne 2(11)/2018, s. 151–163 DOI: 10.19265/KP.2018.211151 www.kontekstypedagogiczne.pl Joanna Mytnik [email protected] University of Bialystok ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3924-8188 Educational and therapeutic impact of contemporary animated film characters on the viewer Introduction From the beginning of its existence, films have been evoking interest and giving inspiration. A motion picture has been a tool for many practition- ers. Educators, psychologists, therapists, and animators have long appreci- ated and used film art in their work. Considering the increasing pervasion of the mass media into human life, its presence in many aspects of human functioning, it is necessary to pay close attention to the power of its influ- ence. It is worth noting that the products of popular culture do not only carry risks. Films created for commercial purposes also serve higher purposes, not just entertainment. Being easier in perception for the viewer at any age (through the frequency of contact with this cultural product), it can influence their emotions more strongly, encourage deeper mental work and stimulate reflection. In this article I would like to focus primarily on the possibilities of supporting upbringing and human development, referring to the assump- tions of film therapy (Kozubek, 2016). According to Depta, “the starting point of educational work with a film should be the use of such films that are most popular among young viewers while increasing their cognitive horizons” (Depta, 1983, p. 165). The potential of contemporary animated films seems to be indisputable in this respect, as will be demonstrated by the analysis of the main factor of their influence on the viewer, namely film heroes.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Peterson
    Sandy Hook, Gateway NRA, NPS Oral History Interview with Robert Peterson 51st ADA, Battery C 1971 Interviewed by Mary Rasa, NPS November 20, 2003 Transcribed by Mary Rasa Barracks 74 as living, working and eating space for Battery C, 3rd Battalion, 51st ADA. Photo courtesy of Gateway NRA/NPS Robert Peterson outside his business headquarters in Beaverton, Oregon, 2010. Photo courtesy of Robert Peterson 1 Editor’s notes on parenthesis ( ) MR: Hello. My name is Mary Rasa. I am Sandy Hook Museum Curator. I am here with Bob Peterson. It is November 20, 2003. We are here to do a little interview and I would like you to state your name for the record and where and when were you born. RP: Bob Peterson. Born the 8th of March 1949 in Longview, Washington. MR: Where did you go to school? RP: Eugene, Oregon at high school and two years of college before I joined the Army in 1970. MR: Did your Father or Grandfather serve in the military? RP: My Father was in the Seabees in World War II in South Pacific. MR: What years did you serve? RP: 1970-1971. MR: Were you just at Fort Hancock or did you go other places? RP: I had basic training at Fort Gordon, California and advanced training in Field Artillery in Fort Carson, Colorado. And then of course, with that for a background, they sent me to a Nike Herc (Hercules) site. (laughter) MR: How did you end up getting stationed at Fort Hancock? RP: Strictly luck of the draw. MR: Did you know anything about this place before you came? RP: Absolutely nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Factualwritingfinal.Pdf
    Introduction to Disney There is a long history behind Disney and many surprising facts that not many people know. Over the years Disney has evolved as a company and their films evolved with them, there are many reasons for this. So why and how has Disney changed? I have researched into Disney from the beginning to see how the company started and how they got their ideas. This all lead up to what happened in the company including the involvement of pixar, and how the Disney films changed in regards to the content and the reception. Now with the relevant facts you can make up your own mind about when Disney was at their best. Walt Disney Studios was founded in 1923 by brothers Walt Disney and Roy O. Disney. Originally Disney was called ‘Disney Brothers cartoon studio’ that produced a series of short animated films called the Alice Comedies. The first Alice Comedy was a ten minute reel called Alice’s Wonderland. In 1926 the company name was changed to the Walt Disney Studio. Disney then developed a cartoon series with the character Oswald the Lucky Rabbit this was distributed by Winkler Pictures, therefore Disney didn’t make a lot of money. Winkler’s Husband took over the company in 1928 and Disney ended up losing the contract of Oswald. He was unsuccessful in trying to take over Disney so instead started his own animation studio called Snappy Comedies, and hired away four of Disney’s primary animators to do this. Disney planned to get back on track by coming up with the idea of a mouse character which he originally named Mortimer but when Lillian (Disney’s wife) disliked the name, the mouse was renamed Mickey Mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Giacchino
    MICHAEL GIACCHINO AWARDS & NOMINATIONS FILM: ASCAP COMPOSERS CHOICE JOJO RABBIT AWARDS NOMINATION (2020) ASCAP Film Score of the Year 73RD BRITISH ACADEMY FILM JOJO RABBIT AWARDS NOMINATION (2020) Best Original Score THE SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AND JOJO RABBIT LYRICISTS NOMINATION (2019) Outstanding Original Score for a Studio Film HOLLYWOOD MUSIC IN MEDIA SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME AWARD (2019) Original Score – Sci-Fi Fantasy HOLLYWOOD MUSIC IN MEDIA JOJO RABBIT AWARD NOMINATION (2019) Original Score – Feature Film ANNIE AWARD (2019) THE INCREDIBLES 2 Outstanding Achievement in Music INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC THE INCREDIBLES 2 CRITICS AWARD NOMINATION (2019) Best Original Score for an Animated Film INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC JURASSIC WORLD: FALLEN CRITICS AWARD NOMINATION KINGDOM (2019) Best Original Score for a Fantasy/Science Fiction/Horror Film HOLLYWOOD MUSIC IN MEDIA THE INCREDIBLES 2 NOMINATION (2018) Best Original Score - Animated Film ASCAP FILM AND TELEVISION ZOOTOPIA AWARD (2017) Film Score of the Year ASCAP Composers’ Choice Award The Gorfaine/Schwartz Agency, Inc. (818) 260-8500 1 MICHAEL GIACCHINO HOLLYWOOD MUSIC IN MEDIA COCO NOMINATION (2017) Original Score - Animated Film INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC CRITICS ASSOCIATION NOMINATION (2017) Composer of the Year INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC DOCTOR STRANGE CRITICS ASSOCIATION NOMINATION (2017) Best Original Score for a Fantasy/Science Fiction/Horror Film INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC ZOOTOPIA CRITICS ASSOCIATION NOMINATION (2017) Best Original Score for an Animated Film INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC
    [Show full text]