DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case Bus Rapid Transit Lahore Pakistan Muhammad Aamir Basheer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case Bus Rapid Transit Lahore Pakistan Muhammad Aamir Basheer Muhammad Basheer - spine 13mm.pdf 1 28/05/2021 11:20 Muhammad Aamir Basheer Urban Transition as a Result of Transport Investment: The Case Bus C Rapid Transit Lahore Pakistan M Y CM Muhammad Aamir Basheer ificent cultural MY CY CMY - doctoral dissertation K Doctoral dissertation submitted to obtain the academic degrees of Doctor of Urbanism and Spatial Planning (UGent) and Doctor of Transportation Sciences (UHasselt) Supervisors Prof. Luuk Boelens, PhD* - Prof. Davy Janssens, PhD** - Prof. Robert Van der Bijl, PhD* * Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University ** Transportation Research Institute School of Transportation Sciences, Hasselt University reliable, and sustainable transport to the dwellers in magn setting of Lahore, Pakistan. Bus Rapid Transit has emerged as a cost-effective alternative that provides safe, June 2021 2021 Urban Transition as a Result of Transport Investment: The Case Bus Rapid Transit Lahore Pakistan Muhammad Aamir Basheer Doctoral dissertation submitted to obtain the academic degrees of Doctor of Urbanism and Spatial Planning (UGent) and Doctor of Transportation Sciences (UHasselt) Supervisors Prof. Luuk Boelens, PhD* - Prof. Davy Janssens, PhD** - Prof. Robert Van der Bijl, PhD* * Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University ** Transportation Research Institute School of Transportation Sciences, Hasselt University June 2021 ISBN 978-94-6355-492-3 NUR 907, 945 Wettelijk depot: D/2021/10.500/40 Members of the Examination Board Chair Prof. Em. Luc Taerwe, PhD, Ghent University Other members entitled to vote Prof. Luca Bertolini, PhD, Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Netherlands Prof. Greet Deruyter, PhD, Ghent University Prof. An Neven, PhD, Hasselt University Prof. Frank Witlox, PhD, Ghent University Supervisors Prof. Luuk Boelens, PhD, Ghent University Prof. Davy Janssens, PhD, Hasselt University Prof. Robert Van der Bijl, PhD, Ghent University ACKNOWLEDGMENT All praise be to Almighty Allah (Subhaana hoo Wa Ta’ ala) who blessed me with patience, consistency, and resources to acquire the necessary skills for accomplishing this colossal task. I must thank all my promoters (Prof. Dr. Luuk Boelens, Prof. Dr. Davy JANSSENS, and Prof. Dr. Robert Van der Bijl), who extended their invaluable and untiring intellectual capabilities right from scratch to finish this work. Their immense knowledge and quality consciousness kept me on track. The research is the result of approxi- mately 3.5 years-long effort during which I faced many challenges, but encouragement and enthusiasm that I received from my promoters helped me a lot throughout this trajectory. I would also like to thank all the doctoral committee members for their valuable and constructive remarks. I would also like to thank my respected father Mr. Basheer Ahmad Tahir, my mother and all my siblings, who were always there for me. Especial thanks to my better half and daughter, for supporting me during my Ph.D. as I barely had time to spend with them. Their immense love and support helped me a lot in completing my work. I would like to share my gratitude to my AMRP colleagues for their help and emotional support throughout the course of my Ph.D. I consider myself lucky to have such supportive Ph.D. fellows. I hereby extend my exclusive appreciation to Mr. Peter Davids, Mr. Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, and Ms. Areesha Gul for their valuable insight and unconditional support. Moreover, I would like to acknowledge support from my friends, Mr. Mashhood Arif, Mr. Ahamd Adeel, and Mr. Kahlid Javed for making this journey easy for me and helping me in every situation. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my funding institute (e.g. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan), for providing me with the opportunity to complete my studies at one of the best institutes in the world. The time I spend at Ghent University and Universiteit Hasselt was a virtuous experience for me during which I have learned advanced data collection and modeling techniques. Both institutes had played a great share in my personal development that would definitely help me in the forthcoming. Muhammad Aamir Basheer June 2021, Gent I TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgment I Table of Contents II List of Tables VI List of Figures VII Acronyms X Samenvatting XI Summary XVI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 2 1.1.1 The Mobility Rationale 3 1.1.2 The Urban Rationale 4 1.1.3 Economic Rationale 4 1.1.4 The Social Rationale 5 1.2 Problem Statement 5 1.3 Research Questions 6 1.4 Conceptual Framework 7 1.5 Structure of Dissertation 7 2 APPREHENDING BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEMS 11 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 World of Bus Rapid Transit System 13 2.3 Development of Bus Rapid Transit in Asia 14 2.4 Defining and categorizing Bus Rapid Transit 16 2.5 A Comparison of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) 23 2.5.1 Capital and Operational Cost 24 2.5.2 Capacity 27 2.5.3 Capital Cost vs Capacity 29 2.5.4 Ridership 30 2.5.5 Infrastructure 30 2.5.6 Service Attributes 34 2.6 Summary 37 II 3 SPACE, SYSTEM AND THEIR INTERRELATIONS TOWARDS A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 41 3.1 Introduction 42 3.2 Land-use and Transport Interaction 42 3.3 Structuralist and Post-structuralist Theories 45 3.4 Actor-network Theory 47 3.5 Actor Relational Approach 48 3.6 Summary 50 4 KEY DEFINING INDICATORS FOR URBAN TRANSITION AND TRANSPORT INVESTMENT 51 4.1 Introduction 52 4.2 Transport Investment and Travel Behavior 53 4.2.1 Data Collection and Methodology for Travel Behavior 56 4.3 Transport Investment and Urban Transformation 57 4.3.1 Data Collection and Methodology for Urban Transformation 59 4.4 Transport Investment and Economic Development 61 4.4.1 Data Collection and Methodology for Economic Development 65 4.5 Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) 67 4.6 Study Area 70 4.6.1 Bus Rapid Transit in Lahore, Pakistan 71 4.7 Summary 74 5 PARADIGMS OF URBAN GOVERNANCE SYSTEM 75 5.1 Introduction 76 5.2 Period 0: Coming out form the British Empire and Independence 79 5.3 Period 1: Struggling with the new state & Civil War 80 5.3.1 Master Plan for Greater Lahore 80 5.4 Period 2: Inception of Democracy 82 5.4.1 Housing and Physical Planning Department (H & PP) 82 5.4.2 Lahore Development Authority (LDA) 82 5.5 Period 3: Martial Law 83 5.5.1 Lahore Urban Development and Traffic Study (LUDTS), 1980 83 5.5.2 Transport Department (TD) 84 5.5.3 District Regional Transport Authority (DRTA) 85 5.5.4 Traffic Engineering and Transport Planning Agency (TEPA) 85 5.6 Period 4: Second Democratic Era 1988-1999 86 5.6.1 Comprehensive Study on Transportation System in Lahore, 1991 87 5.7 Period 5: Proclamation of Emergency 87 5.7.1 Integrated Master Plan for Lahore 88 5.7.2 Lahore Rapid Mass Transit System (LRMTS) 90 5.8 Period 6: Final Democractic Era 91 5.8.1 Lahore Transport Company (LTC) 93 5.8.2 Transport Planning Unit (TPU) 93 5.8.3 Lahore Urban Transport Master Plan-2030 93 III 5.8.4 Amendment in Integrated Master Plan for Lahore 95 5.8.5 Punjab Mass Transit Authority (PMA) 95 5.8.6 Punjab Provincial Transport Authority 96 5.9 Summary 97 6 TRAVEL BEHAVIOR TRANSITION 99 6.1 Introduction 100 6.2 Modal Split 100 6.3 Modal Shift 101 6.4 Descriptive Statistics and Model Results 103 6.4.1 Model-1 Binary logistic regression 105 6.4.2 Model-2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 106 6.5 Results and Discussion 106 6.5.1 Statistical Model Application 106 6.5.2 Performance Analysis 109 6.6 Summary 111 7 URBAN TRANSFORMATION 113 7.1 Introduction 114 7.2 Land use Transformation 114 7.2.1 Station-1: Shahdara Station 114 7.2.2 Station-2: Timber Market 115 7.2.3 Station-3: Qartaba Chowk 117 7.2.4 Station-4: Shama Chowk 118 7.2.5 Station-5: Ichra 119 7.2.6 Station-6: Kalma Chowk 120 7.2.7 Station-7: Ghazi Chowk 122 7.2.8 Station-8: Chungi Amar Sidhu 123 7.2.9 Station-9: Yohanabad 124 7.2.10 Station-10: Gajjumata 125 7.3 Impact Categories (Typology) 126 7.3.1 Functional Change 126 7.3.2 Structural Change 126 7.3.3 New Development 127 7.3.4 Mix Transformation 128 7.3.5 No Change in Urban Development 129 7.4 Urban Density 129 7.5 Determinants of Land use Transformation 130 7.6 Summary 133 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 135 8.1 Introduction 136 8.2 Data Acquisition and Description 136 8.2.1 Property Data 136 8.2.2 Data regarding locational attributes 137 8.2.3 Descriptive Statistics 139 8.2.4 Modeling Approach 141 8.2.5 Empirical Results 142 IV 8.3 Inward Investment and Expansion of Labor Market 146 8.4 Determinants of Inward Investment 147 8.5 Interview with Real Estate Agents 151 8.6 Summary 151 9 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 153 9.1 Introduction 154 9.2 Role of Urban Development Authorities 154 9.3 Analysis of Building and Zoning Regulations 156 9.4 Role of Transport Agencies 160 9.4.1 Role of Lahore Transport Company (LTC) 160 9.4.2 Role of Traffic Engineering and Transport Planning Agency (TEPA) 161 9.4.3 Role of Punjab Masstransit Authority (PMA) 161 9.5 Summary 162 10 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 163 10.1 Introduction 164 10.2 Review of Findings 164 Reference 173 Annex-A: Interview Script-Residents 193 Annex-B: Interview Script-Investors 199 Annex-C: Interview Script-Real Estate Agents 203 V LIST OF TABLES Table 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Transportation Profession
    TR NEWSMay–June 2021 NUMBER 333 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Transportation Profession PLUS Addressing Diversity at the State Level How Two Universities Promote Inclusion and Diversity Minority Business Development Through Transportation Contracting TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2021 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* OFFICERS The National Academy of Sciences was Chair: Susan A. Shaheen, Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Co-Director, Transportation established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley signed by President Lincoln, as a private, Vice Chair: Nathaniel P. Ford, Sr., Chief Executive Officer, Jacksonville Transportation Authority, Jacksonville, FL nongovernmental institution to advise the Executive Director: Neil J. Pedersen, Transportation Research Board TR nation on issues related to science and tech- nology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. MEMBERS Michael F. Ableson, CEO, Arrival Automotive–North America, Birmingham, MI Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. Marie Therese Dominguez, Commissioner, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany TR The National Academy of Engineering was Ginger Evans, CEO, Reach Airports, LLC, Arlington, VA established in 1964 under the charter of the Michael F. Goodchild, Professor Emeritus, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara National Academy of Sciences to bring the Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton Susan Hanson, Distinguished University Professor Emerita, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, practices of engineering to advising the na- Worcester, MA tion. Members are elected by their peers for Stephen W. Hargarten, Professor, Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee extraordinary contributions to engineering. Chris T. Hendrickson, Hamerschlag University Professor of Engineering Emeritus, Carnegie Mellon University, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Public Transportation and Transportation Demand Management Plan
    Statewide Public Transportation and Transportation Demand Management Plan Commonwealth of Virginia January 2014 FINAL THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Chapter 3 Planning Context and InvestmentChapterFrom Considerations 1 Introductionthe Director From the Director egardless of where you live and work underway. The Tide light rail system in Norfolk is now providing access Rin Virginia, the Virginia Department of to major areas such as Norfolk State University, Tidewater Community Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) is College (Norfolk Campus), Harbor Park, City Hall, MacArthur Center, working with federal, state, regional, local and the Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. And, in Northern Virginia, the and private sector partners to bring you Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project is currently underway. When completed, better transportation choices. There are the Dulles project will connect the National Capital Region to Virginia's 54 public transit systems and 55 human largest employment center (Tysons Corner), Virginia's second largest service operators in Virginia that range in employment concentration (Reston-Herndon) and one of the world’s size from two-bus programs in small towns busiest airports (Dulles International Airport). Virginia’s investment in to larger regional systems like Metrorail these major projects is providing tremendous economic, environmental, in Northern Virginia. Some systems are energy and quality of life benefits and is helping to meet the goal of fee-based, while others provide free building a truly multimodal transportation system. access for the elderly and disabled. By advising, supporting, and funding public Other recent successes that support improved public transportation transportation programs statewide, DRPT include DRPT’s collaboration with the Virginia Department of helps provide safe, reliable transportation options for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It's Our Future: a Choice City
    City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It’s Our Future: A Choice City May 17, 2016 2.1 – MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN ISSUES CONFRONTING OUR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM… TODAY • Land use largely accommodates automobile-oriented corridors • Suburban land use design for majority of developed City • Transportation infrastructure investment supporting suburban roadway system • Increasing travel times • Many older narrow roadways, particularly in the rural area of the City IN THE FUTURE • Improve and sustain the City’s existing suburban and rural roadway network • Facilitate strategic growth within the City’s Strategic Growth Areas, including Transit- Oriented Development, will need to be supported by a multi-modal transportation system • New or renovated roadway projects to follow a Complete Streets approach • Emphasis on regional coordination to fund and implement transportation mega-projects • Maximize Transportation Demand Management to complement transportation infrastructure investments as another tool to reduce traffic congestion The following topics in relation to goals, policies, and action strategies are all equally important in the development of the City’s transportation network and this Master Transportation Plan. The framework for the Master Transportation Plan is: • Citywide Transportation Policies/Complete Streets • Roadways • Transit • Active Transportation • Other Regional Scale Transportation Planning • Transportation Demand Management • Intelligent Transportation Systems INTRODUCTION The City of Virginia Beach Master Transportation Plan (MTP) envisions the future of a multi-modal local and regional transportation network. The City of Virginia Beach has the largest population of any city in the Commonwealth and projections indicate our city will continue to grow. In the next ten years, changing demographics, technology, and environmental changes will have major impacts driving transportation choices and strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • W O R K I N G P a P
    working paper 16 26 Is the Light Rail “Tide” Lifting Property Values? Evidence from Hampton Roads, Virginia Gary A. Wagner, Timothy Komarek, and Julia Martin FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND Working papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded offi cial Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views stated herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Working papers are available on the Cleveland Fed’s website: https://clevelandfed.org/wp Working Paper 16-26 November 2016 Is the Light Rail “Tide” Lifting Property Values? Evidence from Hampton Roads, Virginia Gary A. Wagner, Timothy Komarek, and Julia Martin In this paper we examine the effect of light rail transit on the residential real estate market in Hampton Roads, Virginia. The Norfolk Tide light rail began operations in August 2011 and has experienced disappointing levels of ridership over its fi rst four years of operations. We estimate the effect of the Tide using a difference-in-differences model and consider several outcome variables for the residential housing market, including sales price, sales-list price spread and the time-on-market. Our identifi cation strategy exploits a proposed rail line in neighboring Virginia Beach, Virginia, that was rejected by a referendum in 1999. Overall, the results show negative consequences from the constructed light rail line.
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement of Buses for the Punjab
    SELECTION OF OPERATORS FOR BUS 2012 OPERATIONS IN MAJOR CITIES OF PUNJAB REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Department of Transport 11-A, Egerton Road ADDENDUM Lahore Punjab Pakistan I DISCLAIMER The Transport Department, Punjab (The Transport Department) has prepared this Request for Proposal (RFP) to accommodate public transport demand in major cities of province. This RFP does not claim to contain all the information related to the Project. However, maximum efforts have been made to incorporate available information relevant to the proposed transaction. The Transport Department does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonability of the information contained in this RFP. No decision should be based solely on the basis of the information provided in this RFP. The Transport Department has no liability for any statements, opinions, information provided in this RFP. The Transport Department shall have no liability for any statements, opinions, information or matters (expressed or implied) arising out of, contained in or derived from, or for any omission in, this RFP. Furthermore, the Transport Department will not be liable for any written or oral communication transmitted to third parties in relation to this RFP. II IMPORTANT NOTE All Companies and Joint Ventures complying with criteria given in this document are eligible for this tender, hereafter referred to as Bidders. Prospective bidders must ensure submission of all the required documents indicated in this RFP. Bids received without valid documentary evidence, undertakings, supporting documents and various requirements mentioned in the RFP will be rejected at the initial stage. The data sheets, valid documentary evidences for the critical components as detailed hereinafter should be submitted by the Bidder for scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Regional Transit Vision Plan
    FINAL REPORT February 2011 (this page intentionally left blank) i Table of Contents Final Report Executive Summary 1.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ ES-1 1.1 Vision Plan Purpose and Goals .................................................................................. ES-1 1.2 Vision Plan Components ............................................................................................ ES-1 2.0 Technical Analyses and Stakeholder Outreach ....................................................................... ES-3 2.1 Study Process ............................................................................................................ ES-3 2.2 Study Participants and Stakeholder Outreach ............................................................. ES-6 3.0 Final Recommendations ......................................................................................................... ES-7 3.1 Fixed Guideway and Ferry Corridors .......................................................................... ES-7 3.2 Express and Enhanced Bus Corridors and Circulator Services ................................. ES-21 4.0 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................ ES-23 4.1 Marketing Framework ............................................................................................... ES-23 4.2 Future Re-evaluation of Recommendations .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vol-4, Issue 10 Evaluation of Lahore Bus Rapid Transit System
    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Oct-2015 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-4, Issue 10 Evaluation of Lahore Bus Rapid Transit System Author’s Details: (1) Dr. KASHIF RATHORE (2) KASHIF ALI Institute of Administrative Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Corresponding author: KASHIF ALI ABSTRACT This study evaluates Lahore bus rapid transit system according to BRT standard 2014. This study concludes that deviation from proposed transport policies is one of the factors that lead towards the failure of urban transport system in Lahore. Government did not pay proper attention to the recommendations proposed in different transport studies conducted by JICA and other transport institutions. The Lahore BRT has failed to receive gold, silver or bronze standard as it only achieved “Basic BRT” status. Lahore BRT is experiencing swear maintenance and operational issues that may lead towards the failure of Lahore BRT system in terms of passengers discomfort and reliability of the system may get affected in future. Key Words: Lahore BRT evaluation, BRT scoring, performance evaluation, bus rapid transit system, gap between standard and actual Lahore BRT. 1 INTRODUCTION Lahore is capital of Punjab province with population of 9.25 million according to Punjab development statistics 2014. The increased population needs more educational institutions, health facilities, and employment opportunities. To access these facilities an efficient, safe and comfortable urban transport system is vital. For poor public transport is often the only means of transportation. Without public transport, people would not be able to consider work opportunities at a far distance from their homes. So work opportunities would be limited for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Vision Plan for Hampton Roads
    VISION PLAN DOCUMENT March 2009 A TRANSIT VISION PLAN FOR HAMPTON ROADS Prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the view of HNTB Corporation and its subconsultants who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Authored by the consultant team of HNTB Corporation, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc., RLS and Associates Inc., and Travesky & Associates Ltd. with cooperation from staff from the Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Organization, funding from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, and sponsorship by the Hampton Roads Partnership. HNTB Corporation 2900 South Quincy Street, Suite 200 Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Organization Arlington, Virginia 22305 The Regional Building 723 Woodlake Drive Chesapeake, VA 23320 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 8601 Georgia Avenue, Suite 710 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Hampton Roads Partnership 430 World Trade Center Norfolk, Virginia 23510 RLS and Associates, Inc. 3131 South Dixie Highway, Suite 545 Dayton, Ohio 45439 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation 1313 East Main Street, Suite 300 Richmond VA 23219 Travesky & Associates, Ltd. 3900 Jermantown Road, Suite 300 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Means Business Case Studies in Transit
    TRANSIT MEANS BUSINESS CASE STUDIES IN TRANSIT ® IN 2015, HRT SERVICES ALLOWED THE REGION TO AVOID 45 MILLION VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ON ROADS. Source: Economic Development Research Group, Inc. Economic and Societal Impact of Hampton Roads Transit. 2016. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Effective public transportation reduces traffic congestion. It connects workers to jobs, students to classrooms, and customers to businesses. For some citizens, transit is an economic lifeline. It provides access to employment, healthcare, shopping and other opportunities that are essential to good quality of life and being productive in society. While you may never ride public transit, chances are you depend on someone who does. The presence of public transportation in Hampton Roads – and the potential of future transit investments to Connect Hampton Roads® with a more robust regional system – translates into direct, indirect and induced economic impacts and benefits for the region. With support of The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation and national experts at Economic Development Research Group, this year the first-ever study of regional economic impacts and benefits of transit in Hampton Roads was completed. This booklet contains some key findings. With just over $100 million in annual transit operating and maintenance investments, Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) services today support over 20,300 jobs and $1.5 billion dollars annually in regional economic output (includes direct, indirect and induced). Transit’s role is evident across multiple sectors of the economy. This includes higher education, hospitality and tourism, healthcare, shipbuilding and repair, and niche industries like customer call centers. It also supports ongoing economic development and “placemaking” activities concentrated in areas like Downtown Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP Attachment D Detailed Scope of Work Project Management
    RFP Attachment D Detailed Scope of Work Project Management Oversight for the Tide Light Rail Transit Extension to Virginia Beach Town Center Source: HRT Website 2015 DRPT PMO Tide LRT Extension to Virginia Beach Town Center Page 1 of 120 Table of Contents SECTION I. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Objective ................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION II. REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 8 Contract Management and Administration .............................................................................................. 8 General Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 8 Reports ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Consultant Personnel and Expertise ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside Station Apartments Norfolk, Virginia
    Market Feasibility Analysis Riverside Station Apartments Norfolk, Virginia Prepared for: Curlew Apts. I, L.P. Effective Date: January 21, 2019 Site Inspection: January 21, 2019 Riverside Station Apartments I Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................................II TABLES, FIGURES AND MAPS............................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... VII I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1 A. Overview of Subject.........................................................................................................................................1 B. Purpose............................................................................................................................................................1 C. Format of Report .............................................................................................................................................1 D. Client, Intended User, and Intended Use ........................................................................................................1 E. Applicable Requirements ................................................................................................................................1 F. Scope of Work .................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • State of Transportation in Hampton Roads 2020 Report
    The State of Transportation in Hampton Roads JANUARY 2021 T21-03 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Robert A. Crum, Jr. Executive Director VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY Rick West – Vice-Chair Michael Hipple William Gillette Ella P. Ward – Alternate Vacant – Alternate Vacant – Alternate FRANKLIN NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Frank Rabil McKinley Price Vacant Vacant – Alternate David H. Jenkins – Alternate Leroy Bennett – Alternate GLOUCESTER COUNTY NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Phillip Bazzani Kenneth Alexander Robert Dyer Christopher A Hutson – Alternate Martin A. Thomas, Jr. – Alternate James Wood – Alternate HAMPTON POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Donnie Tuck – Chair W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Douglas Pons Steve Brown – Alternate Herbert R. Green, Jr. – Alternate Pat Dent – Alternate ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY PORTSMOUTH YORK COUNTY William McCarty Vacant Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. Rudolph Jefferson – Alternate Shannon E. Glover – Alternate Sheila Noll – Alternate MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE VA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION The Honorable Mamie E. Locke Jennifer Mitchell, Director The Honorable Lionell Spruill, Sr. Jennifer DeBruhl – Alternate MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY The Honorable Stephen E. Heretick John Reinhart, CEO/Executive Director The Honorable Jeion A. Ward Cathie Vick – Alternate TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMM OF HAMPTON ROADS WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY William E. Harrell, President/Chief Executive Officer Zach Trogdon, Executive Director Ray Amoruso
    [Show full text]