DOCSLIB.ORG

Rainier Community Center Walking Audit Safe Routes to Parks Overview: Top Observations: Top Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rainier Community Center Walking Audit Safe Routes to Parks Overview: Top Observations: Top Recommendations Rainier Community Center Walking Audit Safe Routes to Parks Overview: Top Observations: Top Recommendations: Rainier Community Center is located in Rainier is a large barrier to accessing the Community 1. Establish a wayfinding system connecting the Columbia City in the southeast section of Center and park facilities. Though improvements are Columbia City LINK station, the Columbia City Seattle. This walking audit explored being done to improve crossing distances and block business district, and the Rainier Community accessibility to the community center and lengths, the sidewalk along Rainier needs to be Center/Genesee Park. surrounding park and civic facilities from the improved. Furthermore, access to Rainier from the 2. Improve the pedestrian experience along Rainier neighborhood and the Columbia City LINK west can be circuitous and dilapidated. Avenue and access across Rainier. Light Rail Station. There are few clues along Rainier Avenue, Martin 3. Genesee Park provides many opportunities for The walking audit route began at Rainier Luther King Way, or the Columbia City business recreation and community interaction. Strengthen Community Center and visited the Columbia District about the parks and facilities around the accessibility between surrounding institutions (school, City Light Rail Station on Martin Luther King Community Center. community center, museum, library, health center, etc) Boulevard South (MLK) via South Alaska Street Genesee Park and the Columbia Park to Lake and park. Also develop plan for and South Edmunds Street, sections of Rainier Washington conceptual trail are strong assets but programming/upgrading park space to improve Avenue South and South Genesee Street, and poorly implemented and utilized. usability. Genesee Park. Edmunds is a more enjoyable route than Alaska to 4. S Genesee St needs improved crossings to connect the Community Center, however without better Genesee Park and the Community Center with the signage is not intuitive. For many, Alaska is the neighborhood to the north and Hawthorne logical route yet it needs improvements for Elementary. pedestrians. Participants: Audit leader: Seth Schromen-Wawrin Table of Contents: Page This walking audit was joined by 18 Audit organizer: Mari Becker and Sound Steps Top Recommendations .......................... 1 individuals representing the following Write-up: Seth Schromen-Wawrin Maps of route audited .......................... 2 groups and stakeholders: Reviewed by: Mari Becker Field Notes.......................................... 3 o Sound Steps Photo Credits: Etta Cosey & Mari Becker Contacts & project information............. 19 o Rainier Community Center o Public Health – Seattle & King County o Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) o Seattle Police Department (SPD) o Columbia City Chamber of Commerce o Seattle Audubon o Local residents Download this report from: www.seattle.gov/parks/Seniors/SoundSteps.htm Safe Routes to Parks – Rainier Community Center Walking Audit September 27th, 2010 About Safe Routes to Parks: Safe Routes to Parks (SRtP) is an initiative developed by Public Health Seattle & King County alongside Seattle Parks and Recreation. SRtP follows the Safe Routes to Schools model, which promotes the health of Seattle’s youth by making it easier and safer to walk to school. In the same way, SRtP aims to Map of Walking Route: benefit the health of all Seattle residents by making parks and recreation facilities easier and safer to access on foot. Physical inactivity is a growing concern in King County, with its ensuing health problems ranging from obesity, diabetes and other chronic health conditions. Meanwhile, Seattle’s over 400 parks and 26 community centers offer ideal opportunities for sports, play, exercise, and other active pursuits. Gyms, weight rooms, pools, walking/jogging paths and more provide a vast public resource. However, many community members either do not know about these assets or cannot easily access them. Through education, enforcement and engineering strategies, the goal of SRtP is to increase the number of people walking to local parks and community centers in order to enjoy these important community assets. By walking to Parks and Recreation facilities and then utilizing the resources that they offer, Seattle residents will be more physically active and healthy. Within Parks and Recreation, SRtP is spearheaded by “Sound Steps,” a walking program for adults age 50+ which includes weekly walking groups, hikes, fitness training, health education and pedestrian advocacy. The Sound Steps pedestrian advocacy team chose to pilot SRtP at Rainier Community Center and surrounding parklands such as Columbia Park and Genesee Park. Their first step was to organize a ‘walking audit’ of the area, investigating the safety and accessibility of walking routes that lead to Rainier Community Center and vicinity. This walking audit was modeled after similar audits conducted by Feet First, a Seattle-based pedestrian advocacy organization (www.feetfirst.info/). The information gathered at this walking audit will be distributed through this report to various community stakeholders, with the goal to receive support and funding to accomplish the identified improvements. After completing SRtP strategies around Rainier Community Center, the model will be evaluated and then applied to other Seattle Parks and Recreation facilities. www.seattle.gov/parks/seniors/SoundSteps.htm page 2 Safe Routes to Parks – Rainier Community Center Walking Audit September 27th, 2010 Field Notes Category Location Description Photo Crossing 38th Ave. S & The traffic circle here is a good traffic calming measure for this intersection. S Alaska St. Because of the light at Rainier Ave and Alaska St, the intersection quickly switches from being very quiet to being very busy. The traffic circle reduces the speeds before the traffic moves into the surrounding neighborhoods. Located between the Columbia City business district, the community center, and the Rainier Playfield, this intersection sees a lot of pedestrian traffic. ACTIONS: • Consider signage such as “Residential Street” for vehicles coming from Rainier. • Encourage neighborhood to maintain the traffic circle landscaping. • Expand traffic circle with an intersection painting Crossing & 38th Ave S Rainier Playfield is often used for sports practices by the surrounding neighborhood and schools. People are frequently crossing 38th between the Streetscape between S Alaska St and playfield and the Community Center to access the playfield from the S Conover surrounding neighborhood and Genesee Park. This use has the potential to Way activate both the playfield and the Community Center. ACTIONS: • Change the pavement along 38th from Alaska to Conover Way to visually connect the playfield to the Community Center. • During times of high activity (sports games, park events, etc) close 38th to vehicles. Encouragement 38 th Ave S Currently it appears like many participants to the sport events at Rainier between S Playfield drive to the events and park on the surrounding streets. Nearby Alaska St and Franklin High School uses the fields for softball, baseball, and tennis. This S Conover could be a potential target group to encourage walking to the park Way facilities. ACTIONS: • Talk with the surrounding schools and organized sport leagues about their use of the playfield and potential ways to implement an encouragement campaign www.seattle.gov/parks/seniors/SoundSteps.htm page 3 Safe Routes to Parks – Rainier Community Center Walking Audit September 27th, 2010 Category Location Description Photo Sightline Post Office at The post office drop box is located so it blocks sightlines for drivers to the Alaska and sidewalk. Additionally, cars at the drop box block the sidewalk. Rainier ACTIONS: • SDOT and the community should talk with Michael Fletcher (USPS Manager of Columbia City Station) to have the drop box moved further away from the sidewalk. USPS phone is (206) 725-5117. Sidewalk Alaska The sidewalk is broken and uplifted in several places along this stretch, conditions between 38th which creates tripping hazards. It is a major arterial that many pedestrians and MLK use to connect Columbia City to MLK and the LINK Columbia City Station. ACTIONS: • Discuss with property owners ways to repair sidewalk. Crossing Alaska and Drivers often make rushed right turns from Alaska eastbound onto Rainier Rainier southbound. This is compounded by the steep hill on Alaska and speed of traffic on Rainier. ACTIONS: • Signage to slow traffic. Schools Alaska and There are three schools (Arts in Motion, Zion Preparatory Academy, and 33rd Ave Interagency Academy) along Alaska, however the school zone only covers one and there is no sign stating ‘school’ when westbound. ACTIONS: • Expand school zone and increase signage www.seattle.gov/parks/seniors/SoundSteps.htm page 4 Safe Routes to Parks – Rainier Community Center Walking Audit September 27th, 2010 Category Location Description Photo Safety Washington Washington State Department of Services for the Blind provides services for Services for the visually impaired. Many arrive by transit along MLK or Rainier. There is the Blind – little visual notification that this site exists or that there may be a Alaska and concentration of visually impaired people in the vicinity. 35th ACTIONS: • Consider more apparent signs that alert drivers of a concentration of blind people in the area. • Community members should ask Services for the Blind what their impression of safety is.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study
    Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study Final Report February 2014 (this page left blank intentionally) Initial Segment and Airport Link Before and After Study – Final Report (Feb 2014) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Before and After Study Requirement and Purposes ................................................................................................... 1 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Milestones .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Collection in the Fall .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................................ 2 History of Project Planning and Development ....................................................................................................... 2 Characteristic 1 - Project Scope .............................................................................................................................. 6 Characteristic
    [Show full text]
  • 6513400749.Pdf
    Appendix C-1 Selected Network - Affiliate Preemption Issues KFOX-TV, El Paso/Las Cruces, Texas, Fox Affiliate · Until recent years, the Station was able to preempt what it considered “lower standard programming” during sweeps and replace it with quality programming of interest to local viewers. · Station also, until recently, was able to reschedule sports of little interest to the Texas market (such as ice skating and skiing) and run programs to which the station had previous commitments before Fox decided to expand its sports programming. · Station has declined commitments to local college sports because carrying the games would cause the station to exceed its allocated preemptions. · Station has wanted to air programs of local interest, such as specials during prime time on issues such as Y2k border security, but was denied permission for the preemptions by the network. KIRO-TV, Seattle, Washington, CBS Affiliate · Station reports that the network has become much less flexible regarding make-goods for prime time preemptions. Through 2000, when KIRO-TV preempted any network prime program for a Mariners game or a local news special, KIRO had the option of making those preempted network shows good either in late night or sometime the following weekend. For example on Thursday, June 22, 2000, KIRO aired a 7-10 p.m. Mariners game and made good the two preempted episodes of Diagnosis Murder the following Saturday at 3-4 p.m. and Sunday at 4-5 p.m.. As of 2001, the Station no longer has this extended delay option. When network prime time is preempted locally, the network pressures the Station for make goods the same day in late night.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Parks and Recreation: Off-Leash Areas
    Seattle Parks and Recreation: Off-Leash Areas SEARCH: Seattle.gov This Department Parks Centers & Pools Activities Reservations & Permits Projects & Planning A - Z Index Parks A-Z Park List Search for a Park General Parks Information: (206)684-4075 | Contact Us Search Parks by Feature Animal Control Fields & Athletic Animal Control officers are Facilities charged with providing a safe, healthy and caring environment Gardens where animals and people can Children's Play Areas co-exist. To carry out their mission, Animal Control staff help Trails to educate dog owners and Off-Leash Areas actively enforce Seattle's leash, scoop and license laws. Officers Park History patrol in Seattle parks to ensure the safe and appropriate use of both the off-leash and on-leash areas. Fines for off-leash, license and scooping violations range from $50 to $150, and can be $500 at a beach. Please obey the law! Dogs are not allowed at organized athletic fields, beaches, or children's play areas in Seattle parks, per the Seattle Municipal Code. Seattle Parks and Recreation welcomes you to explore and enjoy most parks (on a leash), and we offer 11 exciting exceptions! At these designated off-leash areas, you are free to run, roll over, meet new friends, work out, play with your owners and socialize with your canine friends. » Off-Leash Area Rules Dr. Jose Rizal Park 1008 12th Ave. S (Map It) Genesee Park and Playfield 4316 S Genesee St. (Map It) Golden Gardens Park 8498 Seaview Pl. NW (Map It) I-5 Colonnade Beneath I-5, south of E Howe St.
    [Show full text]
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Link Station Boardings, Service Change F
    Central Link light rail Weekday Station Activity October 2nd, 2010 to February 4th, 2011 (Service Change Period F) Northbound Southbound Total Boardings Alightings Boardings Alightings Boardings Alightings Westlake Station 0 4,108 4,465 0 4,465 4,108 University Street Station 106 1,562 1,485 96 1,591 1,658 Pioneer Square Station 225 1,253 1,208 223 1,433 1,476 International District/Chinatown Station 765 1,328 1,121 820 1,887 2,148 Stadium Station 176 201 198 242 374 443 SODO Station 331 312 313 327 645 639 Beacon Hill Station 831 379 400 958 1,230 1,337 Mount Baker Station 699 526 549 655 1,249 1,180 Columbia City Station 838 230 228 815 1,066 1,045 Othello Station 867 266 284 887 1,151 1,153 Rainier Beach Station 742 234 211 737 952 971 Tukwila/International Blvd Station 1,559 279 255 1,777 1,814 2,055 SeaTac/Airport Station 3,538 0 0 3,181 3,538 3,181 Total 10,678 10,718 21,395 Central Link light rail Saturday Station Activity October 2nd, 2010 to February 4th, 2011 (Service Change Period F) Northbound Southbound Total Boardings Alightings Boardings Alightings Boardings Alightings Westlake Station 0 3,124 3,046 0 3,046 3,124 University Street Station 54 788 696 55 750 843 Pioneer Square Station 126 495 424 136 550 631 International District/Chinatown Station 412 749 640 392 1,052 1,141 Stadium Station 156 320 208 187 364 506 SODO Station 141 165 148 147 290 311 Beacon Hill Station 499 230 203 508 702 738 Mount Baker Station 349 267 240 286 588 553 Columbia City Station 483 181 168 412 651 593 Othello Station 486 218 235 461 721 679
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Transportation Study Final Report
    Southeast Transportation Study Final Report Prepared for Seattle Department of Transportation by The Underhill Company LLC in association with Mirai Associates Inc Nakano Associates LLC PB America December 2008 Acknowledgements Core Community Team Pete Lamb, Columbia City Business Association Mayor Gregory J. Nickels Joseph Ayele, Ethiopian Business Association Mar Murillo, Filipino Community of Seattle Denise Gloster, Hillman City Business Association Seattle Department of Transportation Nancy Dulaney, Hillman City Business Association Grace Crunican, Director Pamela Wrenn, Hillman City Neighborhood Alliance Susan Sanchez, Director, Policy and Planning Division Sara Valenta, HomeSight Tracy Krawczyk, Transportation Planning Manager Richard Ranhofer, Lakewood Seward Park Neighborhood Sandra Woods, SETS Project Manager Association Hannah McIntosh, Associate Transportation Planner Pat Murakami, Mt. Baker Community Club Dick Burkhart, Othello Station Community Advisory Board SETS Project Advisory Team Gregory Davis, Rainier Beach Coalition for Community Seattle Department of Transportation Empowerment Barbara Gray, Policy, Planning and Major Projects Dawn Tryborn, Rainier Beach Merchants Association Trevor Partap, Traffi c Management Seanna Jordon, Rainier Beach Neighborhood 2014 John Marek, Traffi c Management Jeremy Valenta, Rainier/Othello Safety Association Peter Lagerway, Traffi c Management Rob Mohn, Rainier Valley Chamber of Commerce Randy Wiger, Parking Thao Tran, Rainier Valley Community Development Fund Dawn Schellenberg, Public
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Events Committee Meeting Minutes August 14, 2019 Seattle Municipal Tower, Floor 16, Room 1600
    Special Events Committee Meeting Minutes August 14, 2019 Seattle Municipal Tower, Floor 16, Room 1600 Member Representatives in Attendance: Agency Representatives Noted in Minutes As Citizen Representatives Tom Anderson Citizen Representative Department of Construction & Inspections Dan Powers DCI Noise Abatement Department of Neighborhoods Angela Rae DON Finance and Administrative Services Brenda Strickland FAS King County Metro Transit Not Present Metro Parks and Recreation Not Present Parks Seattle-King County Health Department Rosemary Byrne Health Seattle Center Gretchen Lenihan Seattle Center Seattle Department of Transportation Mike Shea SDOT Seattle Fire Department Tom Heun SFD Seattle Police Department Lt. Joel Williams SPD Phillip Hay SPD Bryan Clenna SPD Seattle Public Utilities Not present SPU Special Events Office Chris Swenson Chair Meli Darby SE Jonelle Mogi SE WA State Liquor & Cannabis Board Lt. Rob Rieder WSLCB Additional Attendees: A/C Steve Hirjak, Andy Fife, Katy Willis, Luke Sillonis, David Doxtater, Jamie Fullen, Mary Bararella, Randy Stegmeier, Aubrey Jimerson, Kate Jarvis Note: As always, these are "raw minutes notes" based on the discussion of the 8/14/19 meeting and do not include every word spoken - not a literal transcript - merely a summary of ideas. Post-Event Evaluations/Comments: DATE EVENT Jul 10, 17, 24, 31 Happy Hour in the Park - Westlake Jul 11-14 Northwest Wake Surf Open • SPD Harbor staffed Thursday to Saturday; No staffing on Sunday; There were some staffing issues on 7/12 on SPD fault, recommending
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Washington Marine Patrol Jurisdiction
    H 101ST S H I 189TH 53RD N T 1 H 188TH 70TH 188TH 9 189TH 2 1 8 4 T 43RD O 188TH 187TH M 187TH 1 4 30TH 187TH 105TH 40TH 5 82ND E R 61ST 186TH H 5 63RD 66TH 185TH S 185TH T 89TH L O 185TH 37TH E T 6 184TH H 36TH L 64TH 186TH L 72ND 185TH 104TH H T 46TH 185TH ROSS C T P H S RE1 EK 186TH H 142ND A BURKE 33RD T 185TH 4 Lake 8TH WashingtonE Marine Patrol Jurisdiction 1 184TH 8 4 185TH 2 183RD 11TH R D V 5 1 H 184TH R 132ND O 68TH 2ND T C 185T 3RD H 183RD 183RD 183RD K T 0 S AM H U 9TH 183RD 24TH 182ND 184 182ND 185TH A H 6 T 66TH 0 183RD 62ND E 182ND 88TH K I 35TH 15TH D 96TH N P 130TH N T 94TH 183RD A B T - Y 183RD U 29TH B 4 57TH 183RD S 181ST 25TH S 33RD 8 183RD S E 7TH 1 A 182ND N S - SUNNYSIDE LL DAWSON E H 182ND E L STONE 182ND H 181ST 181ST IN VALLEY VIEW 14TH I A R 180TH 180TH T 80TH M L 180TH 92ND N 0 181ST L H 126TH I 12TH 8 181ST T 181ST 73RD G 1 83RD MIDVALE 179TH 40TH ORMBREK WOO L 181ST 179TH 179TH 179TH E 180TH I V 6 1 89TH D 4 1ST 178TH 8 179TH 180TH V 2 0 R 180TH N 1 180TH IN I 3RD 5 H H 91ST 178TH T 28TH T TH N 11TH T 134TH N 177TH H 8 T 175TH V C 180 I N D 147TH 177TH RPE T E 1 H 7 47TH 8 175TH 102ND IR DE SE IN N 7 1 7 BOTHELL D I D R 179TH I 1 L CL O E T 8 177TH LL E T O A N 22ND R L WALLINGFORD 177TH 88TH E 176TH E Tracy Owen A ID S G P 176TH T 89TH RS E WO 178TH O O TH 92ND E O 1 E R 3 176TH H V DI W 178 S BROOKSIDE 8 I 20T N 3 175TH 18TH H 37TH 176TH R E 1 H V W 33RD Station Park W ILL INV IL 1 174TH 3 EASON O D 174TH 44TH 175TH O L 20TH 102ND 1 145TH 0 175TH E 9TH 7 RONALD 174TH 6100 140TH 172ND T BEACH 174TH 95TH
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Baker View NEWS of the MOUNT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB Issue 236, August 2013 2811 Mt
    The Mount Baker View NEWS OF THE MOUNT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB ISSUE 236, AUGUST 2013 2811 Mt. Rainier Drive S. | www.mountbaker.org | 206.722.7209 TRANSIT FORUM PUTS NEIGHBORS AT THE CENTER OF MOUNT BAKER STATION DEVELOPMENT By Sue Cary, outgoing MBCC Zoning, Land Use, Planning & Transportation (ZLUPT) Committee Chair On April 8, over 100 people gathered at the Clubhouse for a com- City Council members Richard Conlin, Tom Rasmussen and Sally munity forum on the issues and opportunities surrounding new Clark were present, along with representatives from Sound Transit, development in the vicinity of the Mount Baker light rail station. King County Metro, University of Washington, South East Effective The purpose of the forum, in keeping with the mission of the Com- Development, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Office munity Club, was to inform the community regarding related pub- of Housing, Rainier Valley Community Loan Fund, Artspace and lic policy issues and provide a setting for civic discussion of the other developers and owners of nearby commercial properties. issues. This forum was the culmination of almost three years of community participation in the City’s planning process for transit- Before opening the discussion to general questions from the audi- oriented development and proposed zoning changes. ence, Andy directed a number of questions to our panelists deal- ing with development opportunities, impediments to quality new Incoming Board President Andy Reynolds moderated a panel development, traffic and access issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Habitat Restorationand the Status of Avian Communities
    Impacts of Habitat Restoration and the Status of Avian Communities in Seattle City Parks CJ Battey • Toby Ross © TOM SANDERS © DOUG SCHURMAN © TIM BOYER Anna’s Hummingbird Lesser Scaup © DOUG SCHURMAN © DOUG SCHURMAN Yellow Warbler Yellow Heermann’s Gull Bottom left: A volunteer engaged in the Neighborhood Bird Project at Magnuson Park counts gulls and waterfowl on a platform in Lake Washington. BACKGROUND The Neighborhood Bird Project (NBP) is a citizen science initiative that began in 1994, conceived, developed and managed by the Seattle Audubon Society. The NBP has two main goals; the first to monitor trends in avian abundance in Seattle City parks and green spaces. The second aims to empower citizens in becoming advocates for birds and wildlife habitat in their neighborhoods and communities. Monthly surveys are conducted by teams of volunteer bird watchers who conduct surveys at eight King County parks and green spaces – Carkeek Park, Golden Gardens Park, Discovery Park, Seward Park, Genesee Park, Washington Park Arboretum, Magnuson Park and Lake Forest Park. The data from these surveys provide an insight into the avian diversity and abundance in urban areas and affords an appreciation of the diversity that can be found in cities given appropriate quality habitat. Introduction City parks present a unique opportunity for public communities, the Seattle Audubon Society started the engagement with nature, as well as providing habitat Neighborhood Bird Project (NBP) in 1994, with a series of for wildlife and ecosystem services for millions of urban volunteer-led surveys in Carkeek Park. Surveys have since residents. Within the urban core of Seattle, city parks have expanded to seven other sites, and today are conducted been the focus of many habitat restoration projects to once a month, year-round, at each of over 200 survey points improve habitat quality and restore degraded lands – efforts distributed in natural or restored habitats in the Seattle area.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area
    APPENDIX G Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area June 2014 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement This appendix lists and illustrates the parks and recreation facilities in the Plan area based on available geographic information systems (GIS) data. GIS data sources were as follows: • Snohomish County • King County • Pierce County • City of Everett • City of Mountlake Terrace • City of Lake Forest Park This information was not verified in the field and parks and recreation facility representatives were not contacted to determine ownership or the recreational uses associated with these resources. Over 1,300 parks and recreation facilities were listed in the available GIS database including a wide variety of open space areas, sports fields, trails, and water- oriented facilities. The park or recreation facility ID numbers in Table G-1 correspond to those ID numbers in Figure G-1 and Figure G-2. Table G-1. Parks and recreation facilities in the Plan area, by county Facility ID Facility ID number Facility name number Facility name Snohomish County 104 Unnamed park or recreation facility 3 Unnamed park or recreation facility 105 Unnamed park or recreation facility 5 Unnamed park or recreation facility 106 Unnamed park or recreation facility 6 Unnamed park or recreation facility 107 Unnamed park or recreation facility 7 Unnamed park or recreation facility 108 Unnamed park or recreation facility 9 Unnamed park or recreation facility 109 Unnamed park or recreation facility 19 Unnamed park or recreation facility 110 Unnamed
    [Show full text]