DOCSLIB.ORG

Sistem Pemerintahan Negara Malaysia Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sistem Pemerintahan Negara Malaysia Pdf Sistem pemerintahan negara malaysia pdf Continue Malaysia is a southeast Asian country bordering Indonesia, Thailand, Brunei and Singapore. Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy. The Malaysian system of state control is the legacy of the British colony. The system of government adopted by Malaysia is the parliamentary (English Westminster Parliament). The head of government is the Prime Minister, and the head of state or head of state is Jan DiPertuan Agung. The separation of state power there are three main public institutions in the implementation of the government, namely: the Legislature (legislative) of the State Agency (executive) judicial (judicial) Legislature has the power to change the law. Parliament consists of Seri Paduk Baginda Jan di Pertuan Agong and two chambers, the Council of State and the House of Commons. Jan di Pertuan AgongSeri Paduka Baginda Jan di Pertuan Agong is the head of state/head of state who has priority decision all in the federation and can not be charged in any court case. The Council of State of the State council is the Supreme Council, which plays an important role in the more detailed discussion of the bill. He is also responsible for discussing issues of public interest. The House of Commons of the People's Council is a special assembly for people who bring the aspirations of people through their representatives in Parliament. Members of the House of Commons are elected directly by the people at the general election. GOVERNMENT AGENCY (EXECUTIVE) The government body or executive branch is the body that governs the wheel of government in accordance with the constitution. The Congregation of Ministers is the executive body that carries out Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di Pertuan Agong. The Mejlis RajaMajlis Raja-Raja contains all Malay kings and Jan di Pertuan Agong. The judiciary is the third body in the Malaysian Government system. This judiciary is controlled by the High Court and the Lower Court. Page 2 Studying the science of citizenship education or PKN related to a country, it will certainly be easier when directly paying attention to the example of a country that already exists in terms of its form and system of government. Finally, according to Wikipedia, the management system is an untouched order consisting of various components that work interdependently and affect the achievement of the goals and functions of the government. In this article we will discuss the Malaysian state system, which is one of the neighboring countries very close to Indonesia. The nation that belongs to the founding country of ASEAN is known to apply a different system to our country in the explanation below. Before discussing further issues related to the management system, the most from Malaysia with our country is a form of the country. Malaysia is a monarchy or kingdom consisting of several states. The head of Malaysia is a king who is called the great king and is elected by nine kings in the state and served for 5 years. Al-Sultan Abdullah Riyatuddin al-Mustafa Billah Shah ibn Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah al-Mustain Billah is the name of the Malaysian King of the Pahangs, who has been in power since January 2019. The King of Malaysia acts as head of state and supreme leader of the armed forces or army. As a federal state, Malaysia has 13 states as well as 3 federal territories with Kuala Lumpur as the capital and Putrajaya as the center of the federal government. The United States in Malaysia includes Johor Darul Takzi, Keda Darul Aman, Kelantan Darul Naim, Melaka Historic City, Negeri Sembilan Darul Husus, Pahang Darul Makmur, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Perlis Indera Kaiangan, Penang, Pulau Mutiara, Sabah Negeri Bawa Bau, Sarawak Bumi, Kenganian, Selangan Dahul Malaysia Malaysia, as one of the Malay States, which has the form of a constitutional monarchy, adopts a system of parliamentary democratic governance. This system of government was implemented by the Malaysian state on the basis of Westminster, because it was still included in the English colonies or its former colonies during colonial rule. The head of Malaysia's executive government is the Prime Minister, elected by the Cabinet. The Prime Minister is a member of the House of Commons, which comes from the majority of the group in Parliament, while the Cabinet itself is one of the elected from the House of Commons or the Council of State. Malaysia adheres to a two-dimensional system, which has the House of Representatives and the Council of State. The 70-member State Council will serve for three years and consists of 26 members of the state Legislature as representatives of 13 states, as well as the remaining 44 members appointed by Seri Paduk Baginda Jan di Pertuan Agong for consultations and consultations of the Prime Minister, including two members of the federal territory of Kuala Lumpur, one of Labuan and Putrajaya. The House of Representatives consists of 220 directly elected members in the electoral process, and these members will represent one region or state. Each member of the House of Representatives will serve for 5 years in accordance with the electoral process. The basic principle of citizenship applied Malaysia sanguine issue This is some explanation of the Malaysian state system of government that should be properly considered and can be imprisoned as part of the understanding of the system of governance located in a particular country. Malaysia is an example of a parliamentary monarchy that is certainly different индонезийский. Координаты: 2'30'N 112'30'E / 2500'N 112500 'E / 2500; 112,500 Малайзия Флаг Эмблема Девиз: Союзное качество » Ассоциация добавляет ExcellenceНациональный гимн: Negaraku Малайзии в АСЕАН CapitalKuala Lumpur3'8'N 101'41'E / 3.133'N 101.683'E / 3,133; 101.683Путраджая (административный центр)2'56'35N 101'41'58E / 2.9430952'N 101.699373'E / 2.9430952; 101.699373Слайт городКуала-Лумпур3'N 101'41'E / 3.133'N 101.683'E / 3.133; 101,683An official language and national languageMelayu[n 1][n 2][n 3]English recognized languages[n 3]Ethnic groups (2018)[2]68.8% Bumiputera23.2% Chinese 7.0% Indian 1.0% Other Religion 61.3% Muslim (61.3% Islamic) official)[3]19.8% Buddhism 9.2% Christianity 6.3% Hinduism 1.3% Traditional Chinese beliefs 1.7% Unknown 0.4% Other[4]DemonimMalaysianFederal Government of the constitutional monarchy• Yang di-Pertuan Agong Abdullah al-Haj[5]Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin• Supreme Court Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat• Chairman of the Senate Rais Yatim• Chairman of the People's Council Azhar Azizan Harun• Deputy Prime Minister Wan Azizah Wan Ismail LegislatifParlemen - Upper House of the State Council - Lower House of the People's CouncilIndependence from the United Kingdom• Independence of the Federation of Malaya 31 August 1957[6]• Sarawak Self-Government 22 July 22 , 1957[6]• Sarawak Independent Government 22 July 22 1963• Cobbold Commission 17 January 1962• Malaysia Act 1963 31 July 1963• Self-Government of North Borneo 31 August 1963• Proclamation of Malaysia 16 September 1963• Separation of Singapore 9 August 1965• ASEAN Declaration 8 August 1967 Area - Total330 ,803 km2 (127,724 sq mi) (66) - Perairan (%)0.3Population - Perkiraan 201732,049,700[7] (44) - Sensus Penduduk 201028.334.135[8] - Kepadatan92/km2 (238,3/sq mi) (116)PDB (KKB)2019 - Total$1.068 triliun[9] (26) - Per kapita$32.501[9] (41)PDB (nominal)2019 - Total$372.628 miliar[9] (38) - Per kapita$11.338[9] (62)Gini (2015)▼ 41[10]sedangIPM (2017)▲ 0.802[11]sangat tinggi · 57Mata uangRinggit (RM) (MYR)Zona waktuMST(UTC+8) - Musim panas (DST)UTC+8 (tidak terpantau)Format tanggaldd-mm-yyyyLajur kemudikiriKode telepon+60Kode ISO 3166MYRanah Internet.my ^ Bagian 9 Undang-Undang Bahasa Nasional 1963/67 menyatakan bahwa Aksara bahasa nasional adalah aksara Rumi : under this provision it will not prohibit the use of Malay characters, better known as Jawi characters, from the national language. ^ Section 2 of the National Language Act 1963/67 states that Unless stipulated in this Law and subject to the protections contained in Article 152 (1) of the Constitution relating to any other language and language of any other community language in Malaysia the national language will be used for official purposes. b См. статью 152 Федеральной конституции Малайзии и Закон о национальном языке 1963/67 года. Кому indomalaya biogeography, which includes Malaysia in it, see Malesia. The Malaysia (Document) Malaysia Treaty Act 1963 Bender Malaysia is a federal state consisting of thirteen states (states) and three federal territories in southeast Asia with an area of 329,847 square kilometers. The capital is Kuala Lumpur, while Putrajaya is the center of the federal government. The country's population reached 30,697,000 in 2015. The country is divided into two regions - West Malaysia and East Malaysia - the Islands of Natuna, the territory of Indonesia in the South China Sea. Malaysia borders Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei and the Philippines. The country is located near the equator and has a tropical climate. The head of Malaysia is a king or sultan who is chosen in turn every 5 years, only the states ruled by the king/sultan have the right to send their representatives to become King of Malaysia. The King of Malaysia usually uses the title of Sri Paduka Baginda Jan di Pertuan Agong. and his Government was headed by the Prime Minister. The Malaysian model of government is similar to the Westminster parliamentary system. Malaysia as a federal state did not exist until 1963. Previously, a group of colonies was created by the British at the end of the 18th century, and the western part of modern Malaysia consisted of several separate kingdoms. The colony was known as the British Malaya until its dissolution in 1946, when it was reorganized as the Union of Malaya.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Islamic Education in Malaysia
    Islamic Education in Malaysia RSIS Monograph No. 18 Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid i i RSIS MONOGRAPH NO. 18 ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN MALAYSIA Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies i Copyright © 2010 Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid Published by S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nanyang Technological University South Spine, S4, Level B4, Nanyang Avenue Singapore 639798 Telephone: 6790 6982 Fax: 6793 2991 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.idss.edu.sg First published in 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Body text set in 11/14 point Warnock Pro Produced by BOOKSMITH ([email protected]) ISBN 978-981-08-5952-7 ii CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Islamic Education 7 3 Introductory Framework and Concepts 7 4 Islamic Education in Malaysia: 13 The Pre-independence Era 5 Islamic Education in Malaysia: 25 The Independence and Post-Independence Era 6 The Contemporary Setting: Which Islamic 44 Education in Malaysia? 7 The Darul Arqam—Rufaqa’—Global Ikhwan 57 Alternative 8 Concluding Analysis 73 Appendixes 80 Bibliography 86 iii The RSIS/IDSS Monograph Series Monograph No. Title 1 Neither Friend Nor Foe Myanmar’s Relations with Thailand since 1988 2 China’s Strategic Engagement with the New ASEAN 3 Beyond Vulnerability? Water in Singapore-Malaysia Relations 4 A New Agenda for the ASEAN Regional Forum 5 The South China Sea Dispute in Philippine Foreign Policy Problems, Challenges and Prospects 6 The OSCE and Co-operative Security in Europe Lessons for Asia 7 Betwixt and Between Southeast Asian Strategic Relations with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ulama in Reconstructing of Religious Education in Malaysia During Early 20Th Century
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11 (9): 1257-1265, 2012 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.11.09.22705 The Role of Ulama in Reconstructing of Religious Education in Malaysia during Early 20th Century Nor Adina Abdul Kadir and Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor Department of Islamic History and Civilization, Academy of Islamic Studies, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract: Religious education across the world has developed in multi structures which reflect to the diversity of religious practices. In Malaysia, Muslim religious education has developed in two forms, traditional and modern systems. Ulama play a vital role to produce human capital for the nation. Close collaboration between ulama and the ruler (sultan / king) produced an outstanding achievement in making sure traditional religious education is able to be transformed into integrated modern system. This is especially evident in Madrasah Idrisiah since its establishment in the year 1917 with the support by then the ruler, Sultan of Perak. Key words: Madrasah Idrisiah % Ulama % Muslim Scholars % Religious education % Malaysia INTRODUCTION British. In 1963, Sabah and Sarawak officially joined the Federation of Malaya and the name then become Many madrasahs in Muslim world began with the Malaysia [5, 6]. influenced of Middle Eastern experiences. Singapore, a The history of Islam in Malaya before independence state that was under Muslim dominant before its was always associated with the relation between ulama independence from Malaysia in 1965, has this experience (Muslim scholars) and sultan (king/ruler) [7]. The when it comes to madrasah establishment [1]. In some emergence of ulama is a great blessing in the history of Muslim countries such as Pakistan, madrasah has been Islam in Malaya.
    [Show full text]
  • Keywords: Malaysia Agreement, MSCC, Cobbold Commission, IGC
    Vol. 3(2.), Disember, 2018, hlm. 13-52 Jurnal Borneo Arkhailogia (Heritage, Archaeology and History) https://jurcon.ums.edu.my/ojums/index.php/JBA/ Satu daripada Tiga Belas: Sabah dan Sarawak dalam Pembentukan Malaysia, 1961-1963 Bilcher Bala1 Manuskrip diterima: 18 April 2018 Diterima untuk penerbitan 4 September 2018 1 Profesor Madya di Program Sejarah, Fakulti Kemanusiaan, Seni dan Warisan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The formation of Malaysia is a process of merging an independent state with British 'self-governing' colonies in Southeast Asia to form a new federal state. The merger was legally compromised involving three levels of comprehensive consultation from 1961 to 1963, namely the MSCC, the Cobbold Commission, and the IGC. There has been confusion among Malaysians on the meaning and history of Malaysia Day, which was celebrated on 16 September. Sabah and Sarawak are the 12th and 13th states in the Federation of Malaysia. Since 2010, the people of Sabah and Sarawak have begun to polemics about two historical dates, namely August 31 and September 16 which directly disputes the status quo of 'state' within the Federation of Malaysia. This article attempts to provide a historical perspective based on the major sources during the process. Keywords: Malaysia Agreement, MSCC, Cobbold Commission, IGC Abstrak Pembentukan Malaysia adalah satu proses penggabungan sebuah negara merdeka dengan jajahan ‘berkerajaan sendiri’ British di Asia Tenggara bagi membentukkan sebuah negara persekutuan yang baharu. Penggabungan ini telah dikompromikan secara perundangan yang melibatkan tiga peringkat perundingan yang komprehensif dari 1961 hingga 1963, iaitu MSCC, Suruhanjaya Cobbold, dan IGC.
    [Show full text]
  • 58 Years of MALAYSIA Perpetuating National Unity UNIVERSITY of MALAYA ART GALLERY, SEPTEMBER 18-23, 2015 Arts & Creativity Exhibition
    58 Years of MALAYSIA Perpetuating National Unity UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA ART GALLERY, SEPTEMBER 18-23, 2015 Arts & Creativity Exhibition Copyright © 2015 by Malaysian Invention & Design Society (MINDS) All rights reserved Contact Information No part of this e-book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any C-3A-10 (4th Floor) Block C, Damansara Intan form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or otherwise without No. 1, Jalan SS 20/27, 47400 Petaling Jaya the prior permission of the copyright holder. Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia TEL: +60 3-7118 2062 www.minds.com.my [email protected] ARTS & CREATIVITY EXHIBITION 2015 WRITE & ILLUSTRATE CONTEST “58 Years of Malaysia??: Perpetuating National Unity” Opening Day Friday, September 18, 2015 9.30AM University of Malaya Art Gallery, Level 5, Chancellery Building, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Presented by Organised by In Collaboration with Supported by 1 Table of Contents Programme for ACE2015 3 ACE2015 Preliminary Judging Panel 4 Organising Committee 5 Foreword 6 Preface 7 Primary Level Works 8 Secondary Level Works 20 Tertiary Level Works 43 2 PROGRAMME FOR ACE2015 Friday, 18 September 2015 Officiating by: 9.30am Opening Ceremony Yang Berhormat Tuan P. Kamalanathan A/L P. Panchanathan Deputy Minister of Education II 10.00am -12.00pm 2-hour talk on Creative Writing, including Q&A Dr Kalpana Sinha, Crossroads Public Research Sdn Bhd 12.00pm - 1.00pm Lunch at Rumah Universiti, University of Malaya 1.00pm - 2.45pm Friday Prayer 3.00pm - 5.00pm 2-hour talk on Illustration, including Q&A Ms Amy Ng, Pikaland Saturday, 19 September 2015 9.00am - 12.00pm 3-hour workshop on creative writing for Primary students Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexuality, Islam and Politics in Malaysia: a Study of the Shifting Strategies of Regulation
    SEXUALITY, ISLAM AND POLITICS IN MALAYSIA: A STUDY OF THE SHIFTING STRATEGIES OF REGULATION TAN BENG HUI B. Ec. (Soc. Sciences) (Hons.), University of Sydney, Australia M.A. in Women and Development, Institute of Social Studies, The Netherlands A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2012 ii Acknowledgements The completion of this dissertation was made possible with the guidance, encouragement and assistance of many people. I would first like to thank all those whom I am unable to name here, most especially those who consented to being interviewed for this research, and those who helped point me to relevant resources and information. I have also benefited from being part of a network of civil society groups that have enriched my understanding of the issues dealt with in this study. Three in particular need mentioning: Sisters in Islam, the Coalition for Sexual and Bodily Rights in Muslim Societies (CSBR), and the Kartini Network for Women’s and Gender Studies in Asia (Kartini Asia Network). I am grateful as well to my colleagues and teachers at the Department of Southeast Asian Studies – most of all my committee comprising Goh Beng Lan, Maznah Mohamad and Irving Chan Johnson – for generously sharing their intellectual insights and helping me sharpen mine. As well, I benefited tremendously from a pool of friends and family who entertained my many questions as I tried to make sense of my research findings. My deepest appreciation goes to Cecilia Ng, Chee Heng Leng, Chin Oy Sim, Diana Wong, Jason Tan, Jeff Tan, Julian C.H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Religiousness on Perceived Business Ethics
    THE INFLUENCE OF RELIGIOUSNESS ON PERCEIVED BUSINESS ETHICS Md. Zabid Abdul Rashid Ong Lee Lee @ Lily Ong ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to determine the influence of religiousness on perceptions of business ethics. Specifically, this paper will examine whether religious values like Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism and Islam have any influence on the ethical perceptions of business executives, and whether the degree of religiousness have any influenced on perceived business ethics. Perceptions of business ethics were looked from three perspectives: business to consumer ethics, organizational ethics, and business-to- business ethics. Based on past studies, a structured questionnaire was developed, and 14 business scenarios were presented to the executives. The religiousness construct had 14 items. A total of 209 responses were usable for analysis. The Cronbach coefficient for the business scenarios was 0.81, while the coefficient for religiousness was 0.79, suggesting a fair level of internal consistency in the responses. In the sample, 32.5% of the respondents were Buddhist, 21.5% were Christians, 12.5% were Hindus, and 33.5% were Muslims. The results showed that there was an association between the level of religiousness and the religious groups (p<0.001), suggesting that certain religious groups (Christians and Muslims) were more religious than others (Buddhist and Hindus). The ANOVA results also showed that there were significant differences in three out of the 14 business ethical scenarios. However, with respect to religiousness, there were only significant differences in one out of the 14 business scenarios. This means that the influence of religiousness on perceived business ethics were limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituting Religion
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 154.5.53.196, on 09 Aug 2018 at 22:42:15, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/888E17F4ACC3739CE1AA443FD07C9BA8 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 154.5.53.196, on 09 Aug 2018 at 22:42:15, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/888E17F4ACC3739CE1AA443FD07C9BA8 constituting religion Most Muslim-majority countries have legal systems that enshrine both Islam and liberal rights. While not necessarily at odds, these dual commitments nonetheless provide legal and symbolic resources for activists to advance contending visions for their states and societies. Using the case study of Malaysia, Constituting Religion examines how these legal arrangements enable litigation and feed the construction of a “rights-versus-rites binary” in law, politics, and the popular imagination. By drawing on extensive primary source material and tracing controversial cases from the court of law to the court of public opinion, this study theorizes the “judicialization of religion” and examines the radiating effects of courts on popular legal and religious consciousness. The book docu- ments how legal institutions catalyze ideological struggles that stand to redefine the nation and its politics. Probing the links between legal pluralism, social movements, secularism, and political Islamism, Constituting Religion sheds new light on the con- fluence of law, religion, politics, and society. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core at https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781108539296.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Domination, Contestation, and Accommodation: 54 Years of Sabah
    Domination, Contestation, and Accommodation: 54 Years of Title Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia Author(s) Faisal, S. Hazis Citation Southeast Asian Studies (2018), 7(3): 341-361 Issue Date 2018-12 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/237246 Right © Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, September 2011 Domination, Contestation, and Accommodation: 54 Years of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia Faisal S. Hazis* This article traces the major contestations that have taken place in Sabah and Sarawak throughout the 54 years of their independence. The two major areas of contestation are state power and local resources, pitting federal leaders against Sabah and Sarawak’s elites. These contestations have forced the federal govern- ment to accommodate the local elites, thus ensuring the stability of Barisan Nasional (BN) rule in the East Malaysian states. However, Sabah and Sarawak elites are not homogeneous since they have different degrees of power, agendas, and aspirations. These differences have led to open feuds between the elites, resulting in the col- lapse of political parties and the formation of new political alignments. Over almost four decades, a great majority of the people in Sabah and Sarawak have acceded to BN rule. However, in the last decade there have been pockets of resistance against the authoritarian rule of BN and the local elites. This article argues that without accountability and a system of checks and balances, the demand for more autonomy by the increasingly vocal Sabah and Sarawak elites will benefit only them and not the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion in Malaysia by the Human Rights Commission Of
    Freedom of Religion in Malaysia By The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) “A Muslim in Malaysia is not only subjected to the general laws enacted by Parliament but also to the State laws of religious nature enacted by Legislature of a State. This is because the Federal Constitution allows the Legislature of a State to legislate and enact offences against the precepts of Islam. Taking the Federal Constitution as a whole, it is clear that it was the intention of the framers of our Constitution to allow Muslims in this country to be also governed by Islamic personal law.” (Zi Publications Sdn Bhd & Anor v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor; Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor (Interveners) [2015]) 1. Being a multi-racial country with citizens who hold various religious beliefs, the freedom of religion forms part of the fundamental rights enshrined under the Federal Constitution (FC). Article 111 states that “every person has the right to profess and practice his religion”. However, there are two restrictions placed on the freedom of religion, firstly, the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam may be controlled or restricted by the individual states in Malaysia and secondly, the freedom to profess and practice ones religion must not result in an act contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality. 1 Article 11 of the Federal Constitution: (1) Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it. (2) No person shall be compelled to pay any tax the proceeds of which are specially allocated in whole or in part for the purposes of a religion other than his own.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Perpetual Help System-DALTA College of Law
    University of Perpetual Help System-DALTA College of Law FOREWORD Philippines maintains a dormant claim over the sovereignty of eastern Sabah based on the claim that in 1658 the Sultan of Brunei had ceded the northeast portion of Borneo to the Sultan of Sulu; and that later in 1878, an agreement was signed by the Sultan of Sulu granting the North Borneo Chartered Company a permanent lease over the territory. Malaysia considered this dispute as a "non-issue", as there is no desire from the actual people of Sabah to be part of the Philippines or of the Sultanate of Sulu. As reported by the Secretary- General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory in a 1963 election. This research will determine whether or not Philippines have proprietary rights over Sabah. Jennylyn B. Albano UPHSD- College of Law 1 | P a g e INTRODUCTION This research will focus on the History of Sabah and determination of whether who really owns it. As we all know even before our ancestors are already fighting for our right over this state however, up until now dispute is still on going. Sabah is one of the 13 member states of Malaysia, and is its easternmost state. It is located on the northern portion of the island of Borneo. It is the second largest state in the country after Sarawak, which it borders on its southwest. It also shares a border with the province of East Kalimantan of Indonesia in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodies of Sound, Agents of Muslim Malayness: Malaysian Identity Politics and The
    Bodies of Sound, Agents of Muslim Malayness: Malaysian Identity Politics and the Symbolic Ecology of the Gambus Lute Joseph M. Kinzer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Christina Sunardi, Chair Patricia Campbell Laurie Sears Philip Schuyler Meilu Ho Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Music ii ©Copyright 2017 Joseph M. Kinzer iii University of Washington Abstract Bodies of Sound, Agents of Muslim Malayness: Malaysian Identity Politics and the Symbolic Ecology of the Gambus Lute Joseph M. Kinzer Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Christina Sunardi Music In this dissertation, I show how Malay-identified performing arts are used to fold in Malay Muslim identity into the urban milieu, not as an alternative to Kuala Lumpur’s contemporary cultural trajectory, but as an integrated part of it. I found this identity negotiation occurring through secular performance traditions of a particular instrument known as the gambus (lute), an Arabic instrument with strong ties to Malay history and trade. During my fieldwork, I discovered that the gambus in Malaysia is a potent symbol through which Malay Muslim identity is negotiated based on various local and transnational conceptions of Islamic modernity. My dissertation explores the material and virtual pathways that converge a number of historical, geographic, and socio-political sites—including the National Museum and the National Conservatory for the Arts, iv Culture, and Heritage—in my experiences studying the gambus and the wider transmission of muzik Melayu (Malay music) in urban Malaysia. I argue that the gambus complicates articulations of Malay identity through multiple agentic forces, including people (musicians, teachers, etc.), the gambus itself (its materials and iconicity), various governmental and non-governmental institutions, and wider oral, aural, and material transmission processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    The Immanent Frame Book Forum on Tamir Moustafa’s Constituting Religion: Islam, Liberal Rights, and the Malaysian State (Cambridge University Press, 2018) Table of Contents Tamir Moustafa, “Constituting Religion – An Introduction” 2 Asli Bali, “Liberal Rights and Religious Rights” 6 Patricia Sloane-White, “Deepening the Zero-Sum Binary” 11 Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, “Mansplaining Religion” 15 Kristen Stilt, “Conversion and Demographic Anxieties” 20 Matthew Nelson, “Constituting Religion: From South Asia to Malaysia” 23 Jaclyn L. Neo, “Constituting Religion, Contesting Constitutional Identity” 28 Shanmuga Kanesalingam, “Judges, Lawyers, Politics: Religion Still Divides Malaysia” 32 Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, “The Religion Trap” 36 Benjamin Schonthal, “Why Religion is Different: Five Contradictions of Religion in Law” 40 Tamir Moustafa, “Constituting Religion – A Reply” 45 Works Cited: 50 https://tif.ssrc.org/category/book-blog/book-forums/constituting-religion/ Tamir Moustafa, “Constituting Religion – An Introduction” Most Muslim-majority countries have legal systems that are meant to embed religion in state law. In many cases, the broad outlines of these legal frameworks are an enduring legacy of colonialism. In others, state regulation of religion is of more recent vintage. But in either instance, the co-constitution of law and religion is a trend that is not likely to end anytime soon. Take, for example, the fact that all the constitutions written in Muslim- majority countries since the turn of the millennium declare Islam the religion of the state. Or, consider the fact that personal status and family law frameworks are typically regulated along religious lines. These sorts of legal arrangements are not unique to Muslim-majority countries, but as a group they tend to regulate religion far more than the global average.
    [Show full text]