Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia By Bartley J. Miller Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Marquette University, 2000 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING MASSACUSEINSTITU E OF TECHNOLOGY In Civil and Environmental Engineering at the JUN 0 4 2001 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LIBRARJES June 2001 © 2001 Bartley J. Miller. All rights reserved The author hereby grants permission to MIT to reproduce and to distribute publicly the paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole and in part Signature of Author: Bartley J. Miller Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 11, 2001 Certified by: Jer e Joseph Connor, Jr., Sc. D. Professor of Civil and Environ ntal Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: ral Buyukozturk, Ph. D. Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia By Bartley J. Miller Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 11, 2001 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT Stadiums are the great stages upon which legends are made, and from which spectators receive excitement and inspiration. As such interesting and important structures, stadiums not only facilitate grand spectacles, but also enhance them through powerful architecture and innovative engineering. In recent years, structural designers have been pressed to develop the most functional, structurally inventive and architecturally celebrated sporting venues. The technological evolution of modem stadiums during this period may be most effectively traced through advances in the design of their structural roof systems. This study investigates the major design concepts, issues and implementations of various stadium roof configurations through structural descriptions, an assessment of advantages and disadvantages of each system, and individual case studies. Because of their distinctive characteristics that transcend conventional materials and design techniques, air-supported, cable-supported and retractable roof systems will be discussed. A number of recently developed design innovations that pose unique solutions but have not yet become common practice in the construction of athletic stadiums will also be included. Collectively, they symbolize progress in stadium design and the speed with which roof systems have evolved. Thesis Supervisor: Jerome J. Connor, Jr. Title: Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Jerome J. Connor for his continued guidance and support over the past year and for the opportunity to gain insights from his wealth of knowledge, experience and advice. I also want to thank Lisa Grebner of Modem Continental for her time and assistance in both our design projects and the completion of this study. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my family for their continued support during my stay at MIT and throughout my academic career. Special thanks to my mother, Joyce, and my father, Larry, for their encouragement and love. I have met and become very close to several fellow classmates during my time at MIT, and would like to thank Nick, Kenny, Matt, Tom, Seattle John, Tai and Allison, Ryan, Jean-Pierre, Yasmine, Greg, Ricardo, Irish John, Peggy, Jesse, Leonardo, Sergio, Corey, Ike, Noelle, Tatiana, Aris and Nadine for their cooperation, camaraderie and friendship. I would like to express my appreciation to Erika for all she has meant to me for as long as I have known her, and especially for her inspiration when I have needed it most. And, finally, special thanks to Kasey, for her friendship, encouragement and understanding. This year would not have been the same without her. 3 Stadia Structural Roof Systems forfor Athletic Stadia 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Stadiums-An Overview.............................................................8 1.1 Stadium Design History.............................................................9 1.2 Stadium Design Advances..........................................................11 1.3 Stadium Design Challenges.........................................................14 1.4 Thesis O bjective................................................................... 18 2. Air-supported Structures...........................................................19 2.1 Structural System .................................................................. 19 2.2 Fabric Membrane Covering......................................................21 2.3 Design Advantages................................................................21 2.4 Design Disadvantages................................................................22 2.5 Construction Issues................................................................23 2 .6 C ase S tudies...........................................................................23 The Silverdome, Pontiac, Michigan............................................23 The RCA Dome, Indianapolis, Indiana........................................25 3. Cable-supported Structures...........................................................27 3.1 Structural System..................................................................27 3.2 Design Advantages................................................................29 3.3 Design Disadvantages ............................................................ 30 3.4 Construction Issues................................................................30 3.5 C ase Studies......................................................................... 31 The Georgia Dome, Atlanta, Georgia.......................................31 The Florida Suncoast Dome, St. Petersburg, Florida......................33 Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia 4 4. Retractable Roof Structures............................................................36 4.1 Structural Systems..................................................................37 4.2 Design Challenges..................................................................38 4 .3 D esign K eys.............................................................................39 4.4 C onstruction Issues....................................................................40 4.4 C ase Studies...........................................................................4 1 Bank One Ballpark, Phoenix, Arizona.......................................41 Safeco Field, Seattle, Washington...........................................43 Enron Field, Houston, Texas.....................................................45 5. Innovations in Stadium Design.........................................................49 5.1 Deployable Structures..............................................................49 5.2 Reciprocal Frame Structures.......................................................51 5.3 Tensegrity-Retractable Roof Option...........................................54 6. Stadiums for the Future..............................................................58 References.................................................................................. .. 60 5 Stadia Structural Roof Systems for Athletic Stadia 5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 A capacity crowd of spectators enjoys the experience of a live sporting ev en t.......................................................................... ... 8 Figure 1.2 The Coliseum, Rome, Italy.......................................................9 Figure 1.3 The Astrodome-"The Eighth Wonder of the World".......................10 Figure 1.4 The Louisiana Superdome, New Orleans, Louisiana..........................11 Figure 1.5 Montreal Olympic Stadium, Montreal, Canada...................................12 Figure 1.6 The Saddledome, Calgary, Canada...............................................13 Figure 1.7 The Millennium Dome, Greenwich, UK.........................................14 Figure 1.8 Aero-elastic model and wind tunnel testing of Miller Park, Milwaukee, W isconsin ....................................................................... 16 Figure 1.9 Snow loads and distribution on Miller Park retractable roof.................17 Figure 2.1 The United States Pavilion, Osaka, Japan......................................19 Figure 2.2 Some geometric plans for air-supported structures............................20 Figure 2.3 The Silverdome, Pontiac, Michigan.............................................24 Figure 2.4 A guard checks the fabric roof of the Silverdome.................................25 Figure 2.5 The Hoosier Dome, Indianapolis, Indiana......................................26 Figure 3.1 Olympic Gymnastic Stadium, Seoul, South Korea............................27 Figure 3.2 Some geometric configurations for cable-supported roofs......................28 Figure 3.3 Cable system of the Georgia Dome awaits single assembly lift................31 Figure 3.4 The Suncoast Dome, St. Petersburg, Florida...................................32 Figure 3.5 The structural system and components of the Suncoast Dome ................. 33 6 Stadia Structural Roof Systems forfor Athletic Stadia 6 Figure 3.6 The Georgia Dome, Atlanta, Georgia ............................................. 34 Figure 3.7 Compression ring and cable connections for cable-supported roof ...... 35 Figure 4.1 The Toronto Skydome, Toronto, Canada......................................37 Figure 4.2 Side view of the fan-shaped
Recommended publications
  • Star Architects, Urban Spectacles and Global Brands
    Star Architects, Urban Spectacles and Global Brands: Exploring the Case of the Tokyo Olympics 2020 Abstract Olympic stadia are often regarded as a political showcase involving a range of influences: the host nation’s international politics, the interests of transnational capitalism along with site-specific meanings and the power of iconic architecture. By examining the 2020 Tokyo Olympic main stadium as a case study, the paper analyzes the controversial Zaha Hadid’ stadium plan in relation to the Japanese nation branding initiative. In doing so, the paper argues that ‘branding’ should be seen as part of an economic and cultural system which seems to enhance the global value of iconic architects and their buildings. Yet, the power of brands can be understood as a contingent entity. This is because its ambivalenct nature entails a tension between exclusiveness and banality; additionally, it could be difficult for branded architects to work across the different regimes of global and local politics; and they are of course also constrained by the logic of neoliberal transnational capitalism. By investigating a major global branded architect, Zaha Hadid and her architecture plan, the paper considers why a new image of Japan could not be adequately created by Hadid’s aesthetics and narratives of the Olympic stadium which should be regarded as a national cultural legacy. The paper then discusses the contested processes of image-making and narrative creation in relation to the representation of Japan in contemporary Olympic culture. The paper concludes with an examination of Kengo Kuma’s architecture language in his 2020 Tokyo Olympics stadium design.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeco Field Seattle, Washington
    Safeco Field Seattle, Washington n 1995, Seattle’s profes- sionalI baseball team, the Mariners, decided they wanted a new stadium. Across the country, great baseball venues were being created, echoing the early days of old-style stadiums, fresh grass fields, and the great outdoors. After 21 years of playing in the fully enclosed Kingdome, the Mariners, too, wanted out in the sun, both for the joy of playing outside and the financial boost it would bring the team. But Seattle’s rainy climate dic- tated that the stadium be equipped with an “umbrella” to shield fans on days of inclement weather. And, thus, the demand was made: Build us a new stadi- um, open to the sky, with real grass, but make sure we can cover the field and the fans when it rains. Plus, do it by opening day 1999. With those ground rules, the design team set to work. The result is Safeco Field, a 47,000 seat, state-of-the-art, retractable roof ballpark. This one-of-a-kind project offers a landmark public amenity that will keep major league baseball in the region for years to come. It pro- vides good family entertainment, while stimulating economic growth and redevelopment in the area. Proactive management and innovative design solutions were required to meet the aggressive Modern Steel Construction / March 2000 project schedule and design chal- lenges. The retractable roof was designed for speedy erection and to minimize the impact on the construction of the seating bowl. The close proximity to the Seattle Fault required special seismic considerations, such as the use of an innovative viscous damping system in the roof that reduces the seismic forces by 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympische Spiele
    Olympische Spiele Bitte beachten Sie, dass zu den ab Seite 39 genannten Filmtiteln im Bundesarchiv kein benutzbares Material vorliegt. Gern können Sie unter [email protected] erfragen, ob eine Nutzung mittlerweile möglich ist. 1912 V. Sommerspiele in Stockholm - Leichtathletik (1930) ... Stockholm 1912, 1. Olympische Spiele mit deutscher Teilnahme - Richard Rau wird bei dieser Olympiade im 200m- Lauf Vierter. 1913 Kaiser Wilhelm der II. begrüßt deutsche Spitzensportler vor der Einweihung des Grunewaldstadiums (Hier sollen 1916 die nächsten Olympischen Spiele stattfinden; die Spiele fallen jedoch aus, denn es ist Krieg (R.2) 1928 Vorbereitung - König Fußball (1926) ... Nach den Kampfspielen versammelte der Deutsche Fußball-Bund die 30 besten deutschen Fußballspieler in Düsseldorf zu einem Vorbereitungskursus für die Olympiade in Amsterdam 1929. - Opel-Woche (1926) ... Reichswehr und Schupo! - Bilder von den Olympiade-Ausscheidungskämpfen im Sportforum Grunewald. (Opel) ... Fechtwettkampf Sommerspiele in Amsterdam - Ufa-Wochenschau 1928 ...Eröffnung der Olympiade 1928 in Amsterdam durch den Aufmarsch der Nationen und Hissung der olympischen Flagge (R.1) - Deulig-Woche / D.L.S.- Wochenschau / Emelka-Woche - Einzelsujets (1928) ... Amsterdam in Zeichen der Olympiade: Straßen und Grachten in Amsterdam, junge Frauen in niederländischen Trachten, Stadion. Olympische Fahnen in den Straßen. Aufnahmen vom Wettkampf. Frau Radke, die Siegerin im 800m-Lauf - DIE ALLGEWALT DES SPORTS (1929) ...Nurmi siegt im 10 000 Meter-Lauf in der Amsterdamer Olympiade. (R.4) - Ufa-Wochenschau (1928) ...Abschlussfeier (22m) 1932 Vorbereitung - Bilder von der Wasserkante 1927-29 ... Auf dem Wege zu den Olympischen Spielen in Los Angeles: Deutsche Teilnehmer im Weser-Stadion in Bremen, Einmarsch der Mannschaft, Schwarz-rot-goldene Fahne - Sport II (Wochenschauaufnahmen) ...die deutschen Teilnehmer an den Olympischen Spielen in Los Angeles bei ihrer Überfahrt auf dem Dampfer „Europa“.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Changer: Centurylink Field Case Study
    CASE STUDY CENTURYLINK FIELD, HOME OF THE SEATTLE SEAHAWKS AND SOUNDERS FC VENUE STATS Location: Seattle, Washington Opened: July 29, 2002 Seating Capacity: 67,000 Owner: Washington State Public Stadium Authority Operator: First & Goal Inc. (FGI) Venue Uses: NFL games; MLS games; NCAA football and international soccer games; Supercross and a variety of community events Construction Cost: $430 million ($566 in 2012 dollars) CENTURYLINK Field’S GREENING STORY: and Event Center. The Kingdome was demolished in 2000 to MOTIVATIONS, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS make way for the new stadium; 97 percent of the concrete was recycled locally, with 35 percent of it reused in the new FROM THE FIELD facility. Thanks to the widespread public and professional interest in “During 2005–2006 many venues and professional teams sustainability in the Northwest, environmental stewardship began the discussion on recycling and composting,” notes was built into CenturyLink Field even before the first U.S. Benge. In 2005 the Seahawks also partnered with Seattle City sports greening programs were established. Back in 2000, Light and Western Washington University to recognize local 35 percent of the concrete from the Kingdome was recycled commitments to renewable energy with a Power Players onsite to construct Seahawks Stadium (which has since been award. “It was an opportunity to highlight and learn from renamed “CenturyLink Field”). different smart energy programs,” Benge says. To this day, CenturyLink Field, the Seattle Seahawks In 2006 FGI launched CenturyLink Field’s recycling and Seattle Sounders FC are leaders in professional sports program with the installation of 75 new recycling bins greening, as founding members of the Green Sports Alliance, around the venue, fan and staff recycling education, and a and business leaders in sustainability, with an onsite new dedicated Recycling Sorting Area created to track and solar array, an aggressive recycling program and a strong separate 17 different recyclable materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Dome Facts, Figures and Records
    GEORGIA DOME FACTS, FIGURES AND RECORDS ‐ The Georgia Dome is the only venue to host the Olympics, Super Bowl and NCAA men’s basketball Final Four. ‐ The Georgia Dome had two general managers in its quarter century run: Khalil Johnson served as general manager from 1989 (during the construction phase) to 2002 when he was named Chief Operating Officer of the Georgia World Congress Center Authority; and Carl Adkins was promoted from assistant manager to general manager in 2002, staying in this role until 2016. ‐ More than 1,400 events took place at the Georgia Dome, drawing 37 million guests and generating more than $7 billion in economic impact. ‐ The grand opening of the Georgia Dome included the stadium’s first official public event entitled “Roam the Dome” held Aug. 14-16, 1992 featuring marching bands, parades and non-athletic competitions, drawing more than 230,000 visitors. ‐ The weekend after “Roam the Dome,” the Atlanta Falcons began the team’s 25-year residency at the Georgia Dome with an exhibition game victory over the Philadelphia Eagles on Aug. 23, 1992 in front of 66,464 fans. ‐ The Georgia Dome’s first concert was the Olympic Flag jam on Sept. 17, 1992, featuring performances by multiple acts, including Whitney Houston, James Brown, Travis Tritt, Santana, TLC, Trisha Yearwood, Lee Greenwood, Alabama, Atlanta Rhythm Section and Gladys Knight. ‐ The first headlining concert at the dome was U2’s Zoo TV Tour, which stopped over on Sept. 25, 1992, drawing a crowd of 52,318. Big Audio Dynamite II and Public Enemy were also on the bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Green V. Garrett: How the Economic Boom of Professional Sports Helped to Create, and Destroy, Baltimore's
    Green v. Garrett: How the Economic Boom of Professional Sports Helped to Create, and Destroy, Baltimore’s Memorial Stadium 1953 Renovation and upper deck construction of Memorial Stadium1 Jordan Vardon J.D. Candidate, May 2011 University of Maryland School of Law Legal History Seminar: Building Baltimore 1 Kneische. Stadium Baltimore. 1953. Enoch Pratt Free Library, Baltimore. Courtesy of Enoch Pratt Free Library, Maryland’s State Library Resource Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Table of Contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................3 II. Historical Background: A Brief History of the Location of Memorial Stadium..............................................................................................................6 A. Ednor Gardens.............................................................................................8 B. Venable Park..............................................................................................10 C. Mount Royal Reservoir..............................................................................12 III. Venable Stadium..............................................................................................16 A. Financial History of Venable Stadium.......................................................19 IV. Baseball in Baltimore.......................................................................................24 V. The Case – Not a Temporary Arrangement.....................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • VENUECONNECT 2013 ATTENDEES As of 11/12/2013
    VENUECONNECT 2013 ATTENDEES as of 11/12/2013 FULL_NAME COMPANY CITY STATE/ PROVINCE COUNTRY Aaron Hurt Howard L. Schrott Arts Center Indianapolis IN Abbie Jo Vander Bol Show Me Center Cape Girardeau MO Adam Cook Rexall Place & Edmonton Expo Centre Edmonton AB Canada Adam Saunders Robert A. (Bob) Bowers Civic Center Port Arthur TX Adam Sinclair American Airlines Center Dallas TX Adam Straight Georgia Dome Atlanta GA Adina Alford Erwin The Fox Theatre - Atlanta Atlanta GA Adonis Jeralds Charlotte Coliseum Charlotte NC Adrian Collier University Center Mercer University Macon GA Adrian Moreno West Cal Arena Sulphur LA AJ Boleski INTRUST Bank Arena/SMG Wichita KS AJ Holzherr Birmingham CrossPlex Birmingham AL Al Diaz McAllen Auditorium & Convention Center McAllen TX Al Karosas Bryce Jordan Center Penn State University University Park PA Al Rojas Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center Dallas TX Alan Freeman Louisiana Superdome & New Orleans Arena New Orleans LA Albert Driscoll Halifax Forum Community Association Halifax NS Albert Milano Strategic Philanthropy, LLC Dallas TX Alberto Galarza Humacao Arena & PAC Humacao PR Alexander Diaz Madison Square Garden New York NY Alexis Berggren Dolby Theatre Hollywood CA Allen Johnson Orlando Venues/Amway Center Orlando FL Andrea Gates-Ehlers UIC Forum Chicago IL Andrew McQueen Leflore County Civic Center/ Argi-Center Greenwood MS Andrew Thompson Harborside Event Center Fort Myers FL Andy Gillentine University of South Carolina Columbia SC Angel Mitchell Ardmore Convention Center Ardmore OK Angie Teel
    [Show full text]
  • HOOP HISTORIANS NEWS Committed to Promoting Goodwill for Basketball Volume # 21 – January, 2006
    HOOP HISTORIANS NEWS Committed to promoting goodwill for basketball Volume # 21 – January, 2006 HOOP HISTORIAN COACH ANOTHER SUCCESSFUL HOT STOVE LEAGUE KEEPS ON WINNING HOLIDAY TOURNAMENT BACK ON THE BURNER Savanna High School is on a roll, recently winning its own Katella (CA) Classic for their second tournament title of the year, and raffled off 11 straight victories – including a recent 64-51 win against Orange League rival Century High – as the Rebels improved to an 18-2 record. Hoop Historian Steve Bennett is the head coach of Savanna High and recently As March Madness looms right had a contingent of fellow Hoop around the corner, one of the Hoop Historians attend their game. Record setting crowds attended this Historians favorite pastimes also is Continued success to the Rebels and years 45th Annual Proviso West not too far away – Baseball. The off- Coach Steve Bennett! Be sure to Holiday Tournament in which Hoop season got off on the right foot at the th check back to the Hoop Historians Historian Joe Spagnolo returned to 60 Pitch & Hit Club Awards Evening News for updates on the success of the position of Executive Tournament in suburban Chicago this month. A the Savanna basketball team. Director. This year’s Christmas number of the Midwest contingent Classic had over 20,000 spectators Hoop Historians were in attendance over the four day event and was won for the annual gala. Among those by perennial power Saint Joseph High being recognized was Friend of the School. The tournament could be Hoop Historians Charlie Hum, who th viewed over the internet on its website was recognized for his 50 year with at www.pwhoops.com which had over the organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hec Edmundson Pavilion Renovation
    Heritage Husky Logos and Marks Through the Years 1936 1937 1958 1932 1953 1959 1971 1974 TM TM 1979 1983 1995 1995 THE LOGO — In April of 2001, Washington launched a new identity program resulting in new unforms for six athletic teams, and enhanced block “W” logo, and a new secondary Husky logo, in an attempt to give the 23 athletic teams at Washington a uniform look, while maintaining the great tradition and heritage of the University of Washington Huskies. The new version of the Husky, drawn by Shelby Tiffany and Phil Long of Nike Team Sports, is a more modernistic Husky, with strong, bold features that represent character, tenacity and courage. For more information on Washington’s official marks, visit the University's licensing web site at www.huskylogos.com 2001 2001 • 2005–05 Washington Basketball • 213 Heritage The Dawghouse Bank of America Arena at Hec Edmundson Pavilion Annual Home Attendance Year Total (# of games) Average 2004 108,781 (14) 7,770 2003 101,983 (15) 6,799 2002 78,877 (12) 6,573 2001 98,149 (15) 6,543 2000 (@KeyArena) 102,058 (13) 7,851 1999 80,992 (12) 6,749 1998 74,469 (14) 5,319 1997 88,399 (15) 5,893 1996 77,171 (15) 5,148 1995 67,648 (13) 5,204 1994 47,515 (13) 3,655 1993 48,587 (16) 3,037 1992 56,812 (16) 3,551 1991 46,096 (16) 2,881 1990 50,167 (16) 3,135 1989 49,277 (14) 3,520 1988 45,875 (13) 3,529 1987 45,875 (13) 4,782 Edmundson Pavilion, as pictured in 1927, has been the host to 776 Washington basketball victories.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Considerations for Retractable-Roof Stadia
    Design Considerations for Retractable-roof Stadia by Andrew H. Frazer S.B. Civil Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of AASSACHUSETTS INSTiTUTE MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING MAY 3 12005 AT THE LIBRARIES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2005 © 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author:.................. ............... .......... Department of Civil Environmental Engineering May 20, 2005 C ertified by:................... ................................................ Jerome J. Connor Professor, Dep tnt of CZvil and Environment Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by:................................................... Andrew J. Whittle Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies BARKER Design Considerations for Retractable-roof Stadia by Andrew H. Frazer Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 20, 2005 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT As existing open-air or fully enclosed stadia are reaching their life expectancies, cities are choosing to replace them with structures with moving roofs. This kind of facility provides protection from weather for spectators, a natural grass playing surface for players, and new sources of revenue for owners. The first retractable-roof stadium in North America, the Rogers Centre, has hosted numerous successful events but cost the city of Toronto over CA$500 million. Today, there are five retractable-roof stadia in use in America. Each has very different structural features designed to accommodate the conditions under which they are placed, and their individual costs reflect the sophistication of these features.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood Philatelist” Is a Bi-Monthly Publication E-Mail: [email protected] by the Hollywood Stamp President: Parker A
    VOLUME 51 HOLLYWOOD ISSUE 5 PHILATELIST Sept / Oct 2017 GOALS: PROMOTING HSC ACTIVI- STAMP COLLECTING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY TIES AND HSC Details (address, hours, officers) ………….. Page 2 1936 Olympics Berlin ………………………………… Page 4 Great Britain Wolsey Pageant Cover …………….. Page 5 SAS 1952 First Flight Polar Cover ………………… Page 6 PAA FAM-14 Unusual FFC …………………………… Page 7 Holocaust Stamps Project ………………………….. Page 8 President’s Corner ……………………………………. Page 9 Imperial Airways FFC ……………………………….. Page 9 Wall Street Journal on Stamps ……………… Page 10, 11 Russian ROPiT Overprints & others..……………. Page 12 The “Hollywood Phi- latelist” is a bimonth- ly publication of the Hollywood Stamp Club. APS Chapter # 0665-052140 HSC Web Site: www.hollywoodstampsclub.com 1 “HOLLYWOOD Hollywood Stamp Club Officers and Members PHILATELIST” of the Board for 2017 Chairman of the Board: Karl V. Shallenberger The “Hollywood Philatelist” is a bi-monthly publication E-Mail: [email protected] by the Hollywood Stamp President: Parker A. Bailey, Jr. Club. E-Mail: [email protected] Editor: Enrique Setaro Vice-President: Jacqueline Cortes The Hollywood Stamp Club Treasurer: Richard Knierim [$$$} meets every Tuesday from Recording Secretary: Hilda Bailey 5 to 9 PM at the Fred Lipp- Membership Chairman: Alan Levak man Multipurpose Center, Directors: Arthur Morris, Hamlet Gayadeen, Robert Lavoie, Jr., 2030 Polk Street, Holly- Stephen Ehrlich, Alan Levak, Michael Rogers, and Richard Sandler wood, FL 33020, Tele- Editor: Enrique Setaro. Asst. Editor: Thomas Walend phone: (954) 921-3404. HSC All Club members are en- LOCA- couraged to submit arti- TION cles, notices, or any other data believed notable to ON our membership. MAP Contact the Editor, by phone (305) 428-0546, via Skype, ID: ensetaro or via e-mail: [email protected] Enrique Setaro, HSC Editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Facilities & Urban Redevelopment
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 10 Article 14 Issue 2 Spring Sports Facilities & Urban Redevelopment David E. Cardwell Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation David E. Cardwell, Sports Facilities & Urban Redevelopment, 10 Marq. Sports L. J. 417 (2000) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol10/iss2/14 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY SPORTS FACILITIES & URBAN REDEVELOPMENT DAVID E. CARDWELL* The 1990s was a decade in which new sports facilities of every type and description were built throughout the United States and Canada. Not since the 1960s when baseball began its major expansion has there been such a boom in new facilities. The decade began with the construc- tion of New Comiskey Park in Chicago in 1991. The following construc- tion boom has continued unabated into the present. What explains this explosion in new design, concepts and construc- tion? It is more than the mere aging of structures (i.e., Wrigley Field is still going strong even though it dates back to 1916). Changes in the economics of the game explain much of the need for new facilities that generate more revenue that can then be retained by the team to pay ever-increasing player salaries. The specifics of the economics of modern professional sports are be- yond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that the fundamental changes in all major professional sports in the United States resulting from player free agency, increased broadcast revenue, merchandise and other non-game revenue, and the conversion from family to corporate ownership of teams has made the financial bottom line just as important as the team's place in the standings.
    [Show full text]